How Its Made 07 Aircraft Engines

แชร์
ฝัง

ความคิดเห็น • 354

  • @bishop044
    @bishop044 11 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This engine has a really cool feature : it can upgrade itself from 4 to 6 cylinders. 03:12

  • @msotil
    @msotil 8 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    I didn't know it was so easy to make an aircraft engine. I'll try in my garage.

  • @rakerbill60
    @rakerbill60 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good ol' Boxer engines. Virtually bullet proof, and easy to work on.
    I'm glad I'm not the only one who saw the engine go from 4 cylinders to 6 and back. Thought my mind was playing tricks on me.

  • @NoxNoxie
    @NoxNoxie 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    speaking of backups, check out the UH-60 hydraulic system, that's what i call an ocean of science

  • @75Bird455
    @75Bird455 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The ignition system if I am correct ( and I'm sure I am, as I perform maintenance on a 1955 Beechcraft Bonanza with an E225-8 engine ) consists of the plugs, wires, and mags. The V-tail has 12 plugs and wires, with two mags. I've also thought it funny that they're still making mags as it's basically 1940's technology and today's coil on cap systems are far more reliable.

  • @jay7264
    @jay7264 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is so awesome. I love engines and planes

  • @aquariass
    @aquariass 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very good video enjoyed the detail! thought it was a subaru engine at first !

  • @TheSamchilders
    @TheSamchilders 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice lil rv8

  • @bwilliamblock
    @bwilliamblock 10 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Half of the video showed a 4-cylinder and the other half is a 6 cylinder

  • @benziel
    @benziel 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love when the narrator says the thing about 4 cylinders right at the end. Because, of course, that lycoming 6 cylinder definetly only uses 4... Nice video though, learned quite a lot!

  • @billbye5119
    @billbye5119 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    wonderful video thanks Lycoming.

  • @mohammadjulhas9260
    @mohammadjulhas9260 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow sopar very very nice vedio and very very happy nice job I like

  • @Donegaldan
    @Donegaldan 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Interesting video. Looks like an aircooled VW engine

  • @djlau1
    @djlau1 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    i like those little planes :)

  • @crimsontrail5393
    @crimsontrail5393 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thats a dream job for thousands of people

  • @smirnofowner
    @smirnofowner 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    the oil prevents contact metal to metal, it cools the hot parts and keep the engine clean inside thats the right phrase.

  • @FelicianB
    @FelicianB 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    ahh. Now it makes sense! Thanx!

  • @av8tore71
    @av8tore71 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's amazing that only silk thread that goes around the case keeps oil from leaking between both halves. Even going to RVC (Rock Valley College) through the AVM program they show us how it's done and since the thread has to be FAA approved it is quite expensive

  • @bradfordmiller7987
    @bradfordmiller7987 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am an oldschool O.G. A&P P.P. & F.C.C. gen rad.tel.op lic...qualified tech. Its Good to see more intrest in Our Craft...WellDone! Carry On...

    • @mzaite
      @mzaite 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Interest sure! No cash to take advantage of the craft out there these days. I think more people WANT to fly than the old pot bellies at the airport lounge think there are. But only 1% of the population can even think about affording it.

  • @smirnofowner
    @smirnofowner 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Understod!

  • @peanuts2105
    @peanuts2105 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's simplicity is it's beauty

  • @nobodyyouknow222
    @nobodyyouknow222 8 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    what's not shown.. why this simple engine, whose development, and tooling costs were paid in 1954, costs $28,000 !!

    • @AmitIka
      @AmitIka 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Capt Larry FAA certification, which creates a monopoly as this is one of the few engines of this size that is certified.

    • @sixstringlove8242
      @sixstringlove8242 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Nobody YouKnow If you have to ask...

    • @meyawabdulaziz3863
      @meyawabdulaziz3863 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      how much it should cost in your opinion ?

    • @jjohnston94
      @jjohnston94 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      4 reasons, actually:
      1. FAA certification
      2. Liability
      3. Liability
      4. Liability

    • @andrewallen9993
      @andrewallen9993 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      bloody lawyers, bloody lawyers and more bloody lawyers plus faa

  • @ManuCath
    @ManuCath 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    That's depends of the point of vue. This more reliable than overhead camshaft with timing belt, and requieres no maintenance during the engine life.

  • @SamnissArandeen
    @SamnissArandeen 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    2:22 Those pistons are bloody massive. You use brake discs that size to stop a Veyron!

  • @smirnofowner
    @smirnofowner 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    The ohc Ford V8 powered tanks during the war, as for their people mowers, simple design, cheap to drive and maintain. Not to different from Peugeot. When you say WW2 tech you must keep in mind cutting edge engine tech is pretty similar to day, engine management such as electronics is what have moved foreward.

  • @jonremmers7723
    @jonremmers7723 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    About dual spark plugs: On planes - safety. On racing cars in the past it was mainly for spark duration. Correctly timed two plugs can together make a longer lasting spark which in turn improves the burn. Two plugs is on racing engines today more or less superceeded by various multiple spark discharge systems like MSD. Read Smokey Yunicks book "Power Secrets". It´s all there.

  • @PatrickLipsinic
    @PatrickLipsinic 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ignition system is everything. Plugs, wires and mags. TCM(Fadec) is starting too use it's new electronic ignition system in new planes now or retro fit older ones. Lycoming is also work on a EFI system also which is starting to show up on some new planes. Getting new tech approve for aviation can take forever and cost millions when it comes to engine. I know, I build engines for a living.

  • @ToadMan8
    @ToadMan8 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Indeed! The part is that was probably something like a 7.2 liter 180 HP engine. The pistons are so huge because it produces all of its power below 2400 RPM. If they used small pistons to produce that power by the engine turning faster, they have to add reduction gearing that increases weight, something to fail, power loss, etc. Props can't turn much faster than 2400 RPM (on this size plane) because if the blade tips exceed the speed of sound, drag increases and thrust decreases.

  • @zero00tolerance
    @zero00tolerance 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is fabulous a result of 109 years of flight

  • @memadmax69
    @memadmax69 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    We may see a resurgence of high tech piston driven radial/center shaft engines with the way gas prices are going...

  • @opmike343
    @opmike343 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Watch carefully as he's installing the cylinder at around 2:22. Notice that the place is missing? Those "torque" plates are only installed temporarily during assembly; they aren't an actual engine component.

  • @porschedude996TT
    @porschedude996TT 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nicely done, that coming from and old FAA Certified Airframe and Powerplant Mechanic. Note that a magneto is not the same as an alternator. A magneto is a device that generates the energy to create the electrical ignition pulse t

  • @smirnofowner
    @smirnofowner 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Silk in this place is absolutly the best thing to use. When the mainbearing are bored in the the block you cant use gaskets, silk can take oil, moves with the metal and dont affect torqe on the bolts. This is lightweigth, few parts, low end torq due to big volume and will last a very long time.

  • @tinman24601
    @tinman24601 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's common in an air cooled engine, The cylinders can be connected to the block individually with space between them.

  • @Zpe3ddyGonzalexx
    @Zpe3ddyGonzalexx 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    2:24 how easy he put on the cylinder when i did my first top end rebuilt on my 2 stroke seadoo it took me 45 minutes i had to invent my own ring compressor

  • @free_spirit1
    @free_spirit1 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    when i saw that happening i immediately went to look in the comments to see if anyone had said what i was thinking, and sure enough, first comment.

  • @DaveOfKnox
    @DaveOfKnox 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    No.Spark plugs are spark plugs. The ignitions system are the magnetos.

  • @SkaBob
    @SkaBob 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cool,1930's technology at work in that engine

  • @joshdenham8404
    @joshdenham8404 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I bet these would do great in a VW Beetle

  • @Rozgreez562
    @Rozgreez562 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like your thinking. :) lol

  • @rrusston2
    @rrusston2 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    These are museum pieces. Time for modern technology now.

    • @andrewallen9993
      @andrewallen9993 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      How you fix computer at 20 000 feet? if first magneto break second still make sparks. No battery and No generator needed.

  • @bishop044
    @bishop044 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    still a very good video though

  • @smirnofowner
    @smirnofowner 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Hercules powered a number of aircraft including Bristol's own Beaufighter heavy fighter design although it was more commonly used on bombers. The Hercules also saw use in civilian designs. The design was also licensed for production in France by SNECMA. It was considered to be one of the most reliable aircraft engines of the era, and was well liked by both pilots and mechanics. (aircooled)
    Frm Wikipedia.
    Think......

  • @mitchamus
    @mitchamus 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    and also - the drive belts (or chains) are just another point for failure, and the cylinder heads are separated to allow proper air-cooling. the separate heads would mean you needed 4 cam shafts, 8 pulleys and 4 belts. timing would be a nightmare :)

  • @df1800
    @df1800 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    @mahdimatabdar Magnetos are part of the electrical circuit that generate electricity from the rotation of the engine - you need these to create electricity for the spark.
    Yes the engine is fuel injected, but you still need a spark plug to start combustion.

  • @mitchamus
    @mitchamus 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Aircraft engines don't rev hard enough to need it.
    For example - a PA-28's redline is about 2700 RPM (from memory)

  • @apriliakawasuzuki
    @apriliakawasuzuki 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Seems easy !

  • @TomCruiseTheRealONE
    @TomCruiseTheRealONE 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    amazing

  • @ThomasGirod
    @ThomasGirod 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    C'est beau.

  • @PatrickLipsinic
    @PatrickLipsinic 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    but with a much bigger displacement. The 4 cylinder ones are 320-360ci.

  • @telosfd
    @telosfd 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like it!!!!!!!

  • @johnhopkins6260
    @johnhopkins6260 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    much like a BMW Airhead... 50 years ago. (FWIW, Dual-plugging really works well)

  • @JerryBiehler
    @JerryBiehler 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lycoming has been building engines for over a hundred years. I think they know what they are doing.

  • @Gasthauz
    @Gasthauz 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    Soharino, you are right, it is. Where is the water cooled, compact, high-performance reliability like that you'd find in any reasonably modern car? This is air cooled 1930's technology!

    • @jmowreader9555
      @jmowreader9555 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is going in an airplane, which has a maximum takeoff weight. Every pound you waste on radiators, coolant and water pumps is a pound you can't use for fuel, passengers or baggage. 1930s technology works fine, and it's lighter.

  • @ASH7388
    @ASH7388 8 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    3:23 where is Magneto?? i dont see his helmet anywhere??? in fact, two Magnetos??? are you sure the other one is not Professor X?

  • @smirnofowner
    @smirnofowner 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Lancaster, an evolution of the troublesome Avro Manchester, was powered by four Rolls-Royce Merlins, or Bristol Hercules engines.
    Bristol Hercules was a 14-cylinder two-row radial aircraft engine and it was aircooled.
    Think ...........

  • @turboconqueringmegaeagle9006
    @turboconqueringmegaeagle9006 8 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    fuck sakes, the number of times they go between the 4 and 6 cylinder engine, and no love, that's a carburetor not an injector.

    • @turboconqueringmegaeagle9006
      @turboconqueringmegaeagle9006 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +ThomasTheSailor Chubby she is only reading an auto que, it makes you wonder why they don't get the company to proof the video tho, there are always annoying mistakes in this program but I love it all the same

    • @turboconqueringmegaeagle9006
      @turboconqueringmegaeagle9006 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      er... no it doesn't, it uses venturi effect to drop the inlet manifold pressure bellow that of the fuel in the float bowl and suck the fuel into the airflow, one side effect of the drop in pressure is the drop in temperature resulting in the need for carb heat controls. don't worry, carb icing is very unlikely to ever effect a PC pilot such as yourself.

    • @andrewallen9993
      @andrewallen9993 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      VW Beetle air cooled engine came from factory with carb de-icing!

    • @SPAZTICCYTOPLASM
      @SPAZTICCYTOPLASM 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's not a carb, it's a EFI. It's like those electronic carbs, but more like throttle body injection.
      This engine originally was Carbueratted, but it hasn't seen a carb since the late 70s early 80s

    • @s130boi9
      @s130boi9 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think that's a throttle body fuel injector

  • @CamAteUrKFC
    @CamAteUrKFC 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    its shaped nd mounted just like a suburu! :)

  • @CLENCHEDCURVE74
    @CLENCHEDCURVE74 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    well it does look like a air-cooled vw engine a vw engine is a opposed twin thats air cooled with the push rod guides going along side the cylinders so ya....

  • @madman2swords
    @madman2swords 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's more fun building a race engine - once built you then have to go and thrash the hell out of it to see how fast it is...

  • @SP2333
    @SP2333 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Epic handy is Epic

  • @paulsantiago6647
    @paulsantiago6647 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Ima put it on my civic

    • @ElBantosClips
      @ElBantosClips 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      A 160hp 4 cylinder lycoming is about 5.2L and uses 36 litres an hour in a cruise :)

    • @daytonasixty-eight1354
      @daytonasixty-eight1354 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ElBantosClips Produces a fuck ton more torque than a civic engine at a 2600 rpm redline.

  • @20cavalos
    @20cavalos 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ohh, o tough they were that parts commonly found in old motorcycle who dont have batteries. (and some bicycles)

  • @00101110o
    @00101110o 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    no, miss announcer, oil does not prevent friction, it reduces it drastically.

  • @leneanderthalien
    @leneanderthalien 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Whe speak here from the aircraft engine from the video, not a unknown Ford V8 (up to 1950, the most V8 Ford was flathead with lateral valves, a prehistoric design(built up up to 1973 (!!!)...), and for your information , the first known 4 valve engine is a Peugeot from 1913 ,well known in...Indianapolis Races...and during many years...

  • @dekeltal
    @dekeltal 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    It actually says "Lycoming" on the cylinder cover: 3:00

  • @FrenchValleyAirport
    @FrenchValleyAirport 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    using gasket from a can and thread to seal an engine: smart.

    • @mzaite
      @mzaite 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      It works, for a given degree of works. most of the drips come from the cylinder or the valve covers usually.

  • @Dexter_Solid
    @Dexter_Solid 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    unlike a car where the crank sits inside the oil pan, the crank on a piston aircraft sits inside the block, the bearings require a tight fight, and as such you can't have a gasket. These engines have been in use for 80 years and theres no issue of reliability.. performance on the other hand leaves a bit to be desired. Which is why most companies today are going with Rotax, rather than Lycomming, or Continental.

  • @DaveOfKnox
    @DaveOfKnox 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    who do you build for

  • @wibblelord2633
    @wibblelord2633 10 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Duel spark plugs??? Surely she means dual?!

    • @wibblelord2633
      @wibblelord2633 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      ***** I was referring to the way it was spelt in the subtitles, I fully understand the concept. Plus, it ensures a more even, and economic burn of the fuel/air mix!

  • @PatrickLipsinic
    @PatrickLipsinic 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    @DaveOfKnox Powermaster Aircraft Engines. We specialize in Bonanzas, Barons and C210s.

  • @EvelcyclopS
    @EvelcyclopS 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    0:50 that ain't his first rodeo!!

  • @smirnofowner
    @smirnofowner 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    you cant move it back and forth, the polishing is to remomve burrs from the grinding and it must be done rotating the crank.

  • @Lindenbum
    @Lindenbum 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow, all I need to build and aircraft engine is some sand paper and a crankshaft

  • @20cavalos
    @20cavalos 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Magnetos instead of batteries.. I want this in my car!

  • @yamahonkawazuki
    @yamahonkawazuki 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    @sabamacx OHC prone to failure. i would NOT want a timing chain to snap while in flight would you?, sure pushrods can break as well. this does happen. but youd know a pushrod is on its way out long before failure happens.

  • @smirnofowner
    @smirnofowner 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    WW2 technology? in the foyrties Ford made a doch v8 with four walve heads , pretty modern design if you ask mee.

  • @MrShobar
    @MrShobar 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Working the polishing jack all day looks like it could lead to early Bursitis.

  • @johnfranks
    @johnfranks 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    1. They use journaled bearings for reliability.
    2. Fasteners are torqued, crimped, &/or safety wired.
    I don't understand what you are saying. Engines are built in many different configurations.

  • @supersnot4
    @supersnot4 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Haha I noticed that too

  • @agungtobo7061
    @agungtobo7061 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    coba kalau ada laser pemotong rumput. pasti keren kalau di pakai di sawah. he he......ngarep gampang.

  • @aviancekidd
    @aviancekidd 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Jorge Rodrigez the thread creates a "locking technique" so that oil won't seep. It's essential

    • @aviancekidd
      @aviancekidd 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Rodriguez ...sorry

  • @THOMASTHESAILOR
    @THOMASTHESAILOR 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    That is Beautiful, but,He *forgot washers* on the Cylinder bolts at 2:30 .. That's a No-No . washers spread out the force and reduce friction for proper torque. I didn't see a Company name or Logo.

    • @turboconqueringmegaeagle9006
      @turboconqueringmegaeagle9006 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      it's not meant to have washers my friend, I've spent too long putting these things together, and neither Lycoming or continental ask for washers under the cylinder base nuts, regardless of the type of nut. anything under the nut would only increase the possible of fretting in the case halves which wrecks engines and can cause a seize.

    • @andrewallen9993
      @andrewallen9993 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Right, RELIABILITY!, thats why these motors are so expensive (along with liability). You can buy VW beetle motors for aircraft if you want an engine without liability....they cost about $6000 for 70HP or so, after all if the damn thing breaks its hard to pull over and call AAA!

  • @piotrlenarczyk5803
    @piotrlenarczyk5803 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    A to tak się robi silniki lotnicze:)

  • @spinnetti
    @spinnetti 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Some of the parts and process look really stone age! (Mishmash of fastener types, and that journal polishing process! Isn't that some kind of osha violation?)

    • @TRC98
      @TRC98 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      spinnetti ikr fucking push rid cams 😂

    • @mzaite
      @mzaite 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Most of aviation is the stone age. The cost to certify new things isn't worth the tiny market for it. Especially in General Aviation.

    • @daytonasixty-eight1354
      @daytonasixty-eight1354 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TRC98 Honestly, I wish more "modern" engines were pushrod. Fuck 3-4 hour head gasket swaps.

  • @dieselscience
    @dieselscience 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Actually, truth be known, it's VW engines that look like opposed airplane engines. Porsche used them originally because they were light, already in production and he could get them for a good price.

  • @bmw320i2
    @bmw320i2 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    I noticed that just after I thought they were going to run into problems running that four cylinder engine with a magneto with six high tension leads.

  • @daDfarSpanTaistheKin
    @daDfarSpanTaistheKin 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    who is this He that does every thing,, seems to be the Jack of all Trades

  • @Anonyminded
    @Anonyminded 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    LOL :D HAHHAA! EPIC! :D

  • @BCrawford64
    @BCrawford64 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    0:46 imagine getting hit in the face our mouth with that

    • @campbellaviation7289
      @campbellaviation7289 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      www.bing.com/images/search?view=detailV2&ccid=94WrPLdY&id=DE896253CC766595CAD03A1F67B1345E3776FB1B&thid=OIP.94WrPLdYIoNBlAm3bgHTGwAAAA&mediaurl=http%3a%2f%2fi.imgur.com%2fby8iD.png&exph=494&expw=388&q=jaw+gets+exploded&simid=608048184040228375&ck=A789EFCE28D95109FFD46CB782FC65C9&selectedIndex=12&FORM=IRPRST&ajaxhist=0

  • @eeyepie
    @eeyepie 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    1920s lawnmower tech

  • @tcart95367
    @tcart95367 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    No they don't. The term "magneto" in itself means it is a generator.

  • @RockRocky09
    @RockRocky09 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    0:45 Oh yea..... =-o

  • @quantomic1106
    @quantomic1106 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If ain't Lycoming I ain't flyin!

    • @dcaonoek
      @dcaonoek 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why you no like Continental?

    • @nobodyyouknow222
      @nobodyyouknow222 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Dane Cook what you no like Franklin, Pratt and Whitney, Jacobs, LeBlonde, Ranger, Rotax, VW, Packard ?

    • @andrewallen9993
      @andrewallen9993 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Packard is a Rolls Royce built down to a price instead of up to a standard. Good enough for Mustangs though as much better than Allison's.

  • @alnoon7600
    @alnoon7600 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    oh alright genius

  • @TCPUDPATM
    @TCPUDPATM 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Piston engines? Remarkable? Yea if you're watching this in 1985...

  • @TheeGoldenOreo
    @TheeGoldenOreo 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    @GKScatalin says 4 a few times. not to mention you can see that there are 4....

  • @sysghost
    @sysghost 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    It burns! IT BURNS! Aaaah.

  • @oceantrolls73
    @oceantrolls73 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    wow! i didn't think piston engines were still made for aircrafts...

  • @Gavs_rc_hobbies
    @Gavs_rc_hobbies 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    they were engines that were already built, i was pointing out the engine that they were building.