I know I asked this several times already but please do a formation battle test like this with apocalypse tanks at the front supported by repair IFVs and Prism Tanks at the rear
The logic is clear, the winner is the one with enough armor to get close to the prism tank, the war miner is a good example of this. Everyone else might even try
Yeah, they killed their own worth in cost + an additional amount extra in %. The most cost effective was other (elite) Prism tanks followed by the Slave Miners.
Given that an elite Battle fortress with *3 elite GGIs an elite sniper/seal and an elite crono legionnaire can beat *4 elite prism tanks I'm still feeling pretty good, and I'm even giving the prisms a chance by not putting a Boris in there instead of the seal/sniper 😊
@@John_Hemingway That's 2000 + 3*400 + 1000(600 if using Britain) + 1500 = 5700 (5300 if using Britain) 4 Prisms in total costs 4800, so even with a Sniper in there which is cheaper than Seal that one Battle Fortress load is indeed more expensive than 4 Prisms. Now if you switch that Seal/Sniper to a Boris which costs 1500, that's 6200 bucks. Meaning that even 5 Prisms is still cheaper than that. Ofc, not talking abt how you got that Boris anyways, presumably due to teams. Ofc if you do have soviet tech, then yes, technically you will also spare 500 from building the Battlefortress itself with Industrial Plant, which makes for 5700 costs. So no, you are not being more cost effective. The actual point of Battlefortress is by being able to use both War Factory and Barracks at the same time, which is another type of efficiency.
@@krischen2428 It really doesn't help BFs case when building one costs nearly double the amount of bucks and time than prism. BFs real main advantage remains being efficiency in productivity by making use of barracks and its potential for anti air which Prism lacks(Siege Choppers, rocketeers, disks are the only real prism hunters.). In reality the chance of you building BFs over Prism will be low, it's usually a good idea to build a few BFs depending on your situation but it's pretty much never a bad idea to swarm Prism. Well, unless you are uber competitive, but then you are almost certainly using France if using allies at all for cannons and that's where mostly your money will go...
Your daily reminder that the only cost-effective counter to Prism Tanks is other Prism Tanks.
1 kirov could kill all those prism tanks, though.
@@karlschipul9753 Only if they stand still.
@@karlschipul9753 in your dream stop crying 1 year old kid
@@karlschipul9753in your dream crying 1 Year old kid is salty 😁
@@karlschipul9753in your dream stop crying 1 Year old kid is salty 😁
Swarms of elite Prism tanks especially in a hold down stance, have always been a very cost effective unit to heavily thin out numbers of ground units.
2:10 is the most funny picture i ever saw on your account.
I know I asked this several times already but please do a formation battle test like this with apocalypse tanks at the front supported by repair IFVs and Prism Tanks at the rear
i will see what i can do
Intensifying light trajectory
Compensating for terrain flux
@@TheRogueminator readjusting stabilizers
Dioptic manifolds clear.
Potency light Energy!
@@gsm8999 Isn't that one "Focusing Light Energy"
The logic is clear, the winner is the one with enough armor to get close to the prism tank, the war miner is a good example of this. Everyone else might even try
Like music to my ears, and even my wallet :^)
2:09 Mirage tank? What mirage tank
Nobody here but us trees🌴🌴🌳🌳🌲🌲
@@louieosumo Well, Prism tanks must be really good at deforestation, then 🤣
perrito @greenelf una consulta; cuando el war miner o slave miner evolucionan a élite, a qué potencia equivalen?
Why no magnetrons?
Are the numbers saying the prism tank was cost effective in every single battle?
Yeah, they killed their own worth in cost + an additional amount extra in %. The most cost effective was other (elite) Prism tanks followed by the Slave Miners.
What would happen if u give them unit fire power ???
讚
2:09 xD
RA2 is now ALL ELITE!
Rhinos, Tesla Tanks, Tank destroyers, War and Slave miners, Apocalypse tanks, Battle fortress and even mirror prism tanks.
All Elite Warfare
@@torshec8634 magnetron, and mastermind not needed.
How about vs. Mastermind?
Hi could you please do a video and see which unit can kill a slave miner one on one? Thanks a lot
If this isn't proof that the prism tank was a bit overpowered in RA2 then I don't know what is.
where i can download yuri's revenge? apparently i haven't found any game where i can legally buy it :-( And never played, just Ra2 500x times.
It's now available on Steam. (this wasn't yet the case when you originally made your comment)
Soviet power supreme
The instrument of doom
Stop crying 1 Year old kid is salty 😁
in your dream stop crying 1 year old kid is salty
Apocalypse is suck stop crying 1 Year old kid is salty 😁
that moment when you realize that elite tank destroyers don't fair any better than elite rhinos
I'm surprised even howitzers can be beaten when moving even on elite.
well, what was their bonus? Double-shot or none?
I bet you people who build battlefortresses over prisms feel very embarrassed right now 😏
We will trample our enemies! Literally
Given that an elite Battle fortress with *3 elite GGIs an elite sniper/seal and an elite crono legionnaire can beat *4 elite prism tanks I'm still feeling pretty good, and I'm even giving the prisms a chance by not putting a Boris in there instead of the seal/sniper 😊
@@John_Hemingway That's 2000 + 3*400 + 1000(600 if using Britain) + 1500 = 5700 (5300 if using Britain)
4 Prisms in total costs 4800, so even with a Sniper in there which is cheaper than Seal that one Battle Fortress load is indeed more expensive than 4 Prisms.
Now if you switch that Seal/Sniper to a Boris which costs 1500, that's 6200 bucks. Meaning that even 5 Prisms is still cheaper than that. Ofc, not talking abt how you got that Boris anyways, presumably due to teams.
Ofc if you do have soviet tech, then yes, technically you will also spare 500 from building the Battlefortress itself with Industrial Plant, which makes for 5700 costs.
So no, you are not being more cost effective. The actual point of Battlefortress is by being able to use both War Factory and Barracks at the same time, which is another type of efficiency.
prism broken only in numbers or elite, single fresh BF is much stronger than fresh prism
@@krischen2428
It really doesn't help BFs case when building one costs nearly double the amount of bucks and time than prism. BFs real main advantage remains being efficiency in productivity by making use of barracks and its potential for anti air which Prism lacks(Siege Choppers, rocketeers, disks are the only real prism hunters.).
In reality the chance of you building BFs over Prism will be low, it's usually a good idea to build a few BFs depending on your situation but it's pretty much never a bad idea to swarm Prism.
Well, unless you are uber competitive, but then you are almost certainly using France if using allies at all for cannons and that's where mostly your money will go...
Same with tesla please