Less bothered by the reading than with 90 minute long ads. I don't mind ads, the creators are paying bills...but 90 minutes...and every 4 minutes? That's pretty trashy
Really? Other than adding a bunch more mid grade sensors to the battle group. What capabilities does this add that the battle group doesn't already have? I see this more valuable in task groups built and DDGs, FFGs, and LCS. Heck might pair well with Zumwalts which can play the role of main sensor node that's stealthy too.
I still think an Ohio class sub should be made into a drone carrier. Could launch UAVs, USVs, and even mini drone subs. Essentially an aircraft carrier that is basically undetectable.
14 Apache units deployed to Saudi Arabia 8 Apaches destroyed Iraqi early warning radar sites 1 Apache damaged by enemy fire 2 soldiers killed, 6 wounded in fratricide incident Over 5,000 Apache's delivered to the U.S. Army and international partners as of 2024
Autralia has several AI surface ship drones also, few submersibles plus aerial drones. AUKUS jut performed tests where any AUKUS partner can control AI drones from anywhere in the world and across the other side of the world they can control each others assets. So USA or UK can control Australian drones from inside their countries while the drone is in Australia or Pacific etc....
More than that, after the DSR and the Surface Warship Review particularly Australia is banking on Unmanned or Optionally Manned surface systems to make up a significant portion of the fleet with 6 to be procured at this point out of a future fleet of 26 major surface combatants.
Remote unmanned vehicles are easy to defeat with jamming... which command is unwilling to implement. Autonomous vehicles are easy to defeat with simple tricks such as fake targets... which command is also unwilling to implement. If we ever get into a serious war, that we are actually trying to win, the drones will not be a problem, but top brass inflexibility will always be a problem.
OK------- .. Large Manned Combat Ships crews can not be reduced beyond set Numbers due to Combat Considerations such as Damage Control, Crews' Operational Efficiency 24 hour/7day week/months-long patrol Operationas and long-term Maintenance of ship systems... All of these are substantially DEGRADED by smaller crews. Trying to rely on Shipyard maintenance has turned out to be a RED HEARING as well...!!!
That's why the us is not building ships their concentration is being put towards unmanned vessels makes me laugh big fucken suprise on the way for our adversarys😊😂
You leave out a very important task that cannot at this time be automated, I’m talking about damage control, the ability to stay in the fight instead of sinking to the bottom, especially the larger water craft
here is the question. let's look at this scenario. one day, you find an unmarked unmanned warship on your legal sea area. it didn't answer any authentication, obviously. because there is no one on board. how do you determine what that ship is doing? is that a threat? or is that an accident? are you going to send sailors on board to check? if according to international maritime regulations, it is lawful for any countries to send crews on board when discovering an unmanned ship inside their territory, to investigate the situation. this has become a communication problem. or a fuse to war. you can say you have every right to send crews on board. however, the owner of the warship can also claim that you violates their rights. especially it is a warship. it can become an international incident. is the international maritime regulation going to change for that soon? or else i can see conflicts definitely will happen this way.
@SubBrief that only answered half of the question. there is no captain or crew to answer questions or explain their intentions if they are being challenged. the warship in this scenario will not/cannot answers the authentication from the coast guard. the machine just do their business which it was ordered to do so. is it 2 years ago? it happened before. a middle east country tried to kidnap a sea mapping drone while an american helicopter had to point their guns to those locals order them to release the drone. what if prc is doing something similar? peaceful passage had to be exercise by a captain in a ship. they have their ais system on and answering authentication if challenged. do a machine/ai warship have equal rights? that's why i think it will definitely cause conflicts in the future.
I am skeptical that automation is at a stage where it could meaningfully reduce personnel or training requirements. USVs will still need personnel to operate, launch, recover, and maintain. Large, long endurance USVs are likely to run into limitations as periodically equipment like engines require maintenance as well as the need to replenish fuel, lubricants, coolants, and munitions.
@@AvocadoAfficionado Intuition based on how autoloaders on MBTs merely move the extra crewman from the tank to the company's maintenance section. Yes, there are fewer people in harms way, but when something goes wrong or there is maintenance that needs doing there will be fewer people immediately on hand to deal with it.
Drone on drone battles seem a contest of who can set the most money on fire. $1 million dollar missiles dispatching $200 drones today is already complete lunacy.
This has me thinking about smaller ships with multi mission capable spaces such as type 26 based ships or LCS. Being able to function as highly agile tenders for medium sized USVs. My understanding is FREMM based ships don't have MM decks. USN planning on buying lots of Constellation Frigates, is it a big problem that they would have more limited support for USVs. Is an MMD a must have for the next USN DDG?
If you get a boat to distract it. Another boat can come from the opposite direction and the USV can be boarded! Once an enemy is onboard they will shut down the USV and tow it away. This issue has still not been addressed. 🤷♂️
I was very curious about Jive's opinion on USVs after listening to Perun's video on the Ukrainian black sea campaign
Merry Christmas 🎄❣️
Merry Christmas Aaron.
You've given this talk before, huh? This is waaaay more formal than other talks.
Ya he’s just reading,
Nah, it's more than that. This is far more structured.
@@Sommyie he probably consults for the navy. “Sub brief llc” gave it away lol.
A retired admiral and officer wrote this. He said it at the beginning. He's just reading what someone else wrote
Less bothered by the reading than with 90 minute long ads. I don't mind ads, the creators are paying bills...but 90 minutes...and every 4 minutes? That's pretty trashy
Merry Christmas USAF and the Pentagon, sorry for letting you work overtime during the holidays😢
Not a single Veritech fighter in the entire trailer. This is not a future worth previewing.
Nothings perfect but you have to start somewhere and find out .
Lynn MInmay. 🤣😉
What a weapon especially for carrier protection
Really? Other than adding a bunch more mid grade sensors to the battle group. What capabilities does this add that the battle group doesn't already have?
I see this more valuable in task groups built and DDGs, FFGs, and LCS. Heck might pair well with Zumwalts which can play the role of main sensor node that's stealthy too.
@@jeremyO9F911O2 in the future, the ability to distribute sensors and launchers far more greatly which is a great advantage
I still think an Ohio class sub should be made into a drone carrier. Could launch UAVs, USVs, and even mini drone subs. Essentially an aircraft carrier that is basically undetectable.
sounds great
I am actually getting to play in this realm as a cots provider and integrator. Neat stuff.
I got to see the Ranger at Fleet Week SF. The concept is so cool.
Truly excellent info guys! The best I have seen from you in months.
They can also be used to carry containerized SM-6 Blk 1b's to supplement MRC in the Pacific. As long as there's a data link we are a go.
I believe we are a long, long way away from deploying a $500 million SPY-6 v.3 Aegis radar platform on an unmanned USV.
14 Apache units deployed to Saudi Arabia
8 Apaches destroyed Iraqi early warning radar sites
1 Apache damaged by enemy fire
2 soldiers killed, 6 wounded in fratricide incident
Over 5,000 Apache's delivered to the U.S. Army and international partners as of 2024
The ships in the description look like the ones that L3Harris operated (Nomad, etc.) via the USN.
A few years ago Congress regulated that naval usv cannot be armed (if I recall correctly). Congress person saw one too many movies.
LCS-class ships are shepparding armed USVs in the Pacific since 2022.
This is like WW2 torpedo boats all over again.
_Autonomous USV are inevitable_
F18 Pilots: Aww💩 Here we go again.🚶♂️
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ AI drone swarms are the future to all domain with satellite constellation communication
Autralia has several AI surface ship drones also, few submersibles plus aerial drones.
AUKUS jut performed tests where any AUKUS partner can control AI drones from anywhere in the world and across the other side of the world they can control each others assets. So USA or UK can control Australian drones from inside their countries while the drone is in Australia or Pacific etc....
More than that, after the DSR and the Surface Warship Review particularly Australia is banking on Unmanned or Optionally Manned surface systems to make up a significant portion of the fleet with 6 to be procured at this point out of a future fleet of 26 major surface combatants.
They’ll be excellent for resupplying Marines…
nice
Removing living sailors from warships is a bad idea.
l can see a USV similar to The Landing Craft Tank (Rocket) or LCT(R) as ammo ships for air defence for fleet, logistic and beach landing
What like a mobile patriot or ESS launcher?
Problem is never going to be the launcher, but the radar.
@@jeremyO9F911O2
RIM-162 ESSM block II using host ships aegis or other networked targeting data
effectively a magazine of VLS dumped over board
Think even smaller versions floaty boy carrying rolling shooty boys
Remote unmanned vehicles are easy to defeat with jamming... which command is unwilling to implement.
Autonomous vehicles are easy to defeat with simple tricks such as fake targets... which command is also unwilling to implement.
If we ever get into a serious war, that we are actually trying to win, the drones will not be a problem, but top brass inflexibility will always be a problem.
OK------- .. Large Manned Combat Ships crews can not be reduced beyond set Numbers due to Combat Considerations such as Damage Control, Crews' Operational Efficiency 24 hour/7day week/months-long patrol Operationas and long-term Maintenance of ship systems... All of these are substantially DEGRADED by smaller crews. Trying to rely on Shipyard maintenance has turned out to be a RED HEARING as well...!!!
this was prepared for a paying consumer
yea, they are called Patrons. www.patron.com/subbrief
LETSSSSS GOOOOOOOO
That's why the us is not building ships their concentration is being put towards unmanned vessels makes me laugh big fucken suprise on the way for our adversarys😊😂
you can't know what you don't know
This is what's gonna save Taiwan fyi.
You leave out a very important task that cannot at this time be automated, I’m talking about damage control, the ability to stay in the fight instead of sinking to the bottom, especially the larger water craft
My understanding is that these craft are by nature expendable. The idea is 2mil for 2 months work is a bargain compared to manned craft.
here is the question. let's look at this scenario.
one day, you find an unmarked unmanned warship on your legal sea area. it didn't answer any authentication, obviously. because there is no one on board. how do you determine what that ship is doing? is that a threat? or is that an accident? are you going to send sailors on board to check?
if according to international maritime regulations, it is lawful for any countries to send crews on board when discovering an unmanned ship inside their territory, to investigate the situation.
this has become a communication problem. or a fuse to war. you can say you have every right to send crews on board. however, the owner of the warship can also claim that you violates their rights. especially it is a warship. it can become an international incident.
is the international maritime regulation going to change for that soon? or else i can see conflicts definitely will happen this way.
UNCLOS says peaceful passage of ships through territorial waters is legal.
@SubBrief that only answered half of the question. there is no captain or crew to answer questions or explain their intentions if they are being challenged. the warship in this scenario will not/cannot answers the authentication from the coast guard. the machine just do their business which it was ordered to do so.
is it 2 years ago? it happened before. a middle east country tried to kidnap a sea mapping drone while an american helicopter had to point their guns to those locals order them to release the drone.
what if prc is doing something similar? peaceful passage had to be exercise by a captain in a ship. they have their ais system on and answering authentication if challenged. do a machine/ai warship have equal rights? that's why i think it will definitely cause conflicts in the future.
I am skeptical that automation is at a stage where it could meaningfully reduce personnel or training requirements. USVs will still need personnel to operate, launch, recover, and maintain. Large, long endurance USVs are likely to run into limitations as periodically equipment like engines require maintenance as well as the need to replenish fuel, lubricants, coolants, and munitions.
Boat crews have been continually shrinking due to automation so I'm not sure what you're basing this on.
@@AvocadoAfficionado Intuition based on how autoloaders on MBTs merely move the extra crewman from the tank to the company's maintenance section. Yes, there are fewer people in harms way, but when something goes wrong or there is maintenance that needs doing there will be fewer people immediately on hand to deal with it.
@StoneCresent Ah yes, using century old mechanical systems as an analogy for drone boats.
Drone on drone battles seem a contest of who can set the most money on fire. $1 million dollar missiles dispatching $200 drones today is already complete lunacy.
Why ha
This has me thinking about smaller ships with multi mission capable spaces such as type 26 based ships or LCS. Being able to function as highly agile tenders for medium sized USVs. My understanding is FREMM based ships don't have MM decks. USN planning on buying lots of Constellation Frigates, is it a big problem that they would have more limited support for USVs. Is an MMD a must have for the next USN DDG?
Two 6th gen aircraft fighters !!!... Chinese are worlds first !!!... happy Christmast !!!
Why haven’t you covered the Navy shooting down its own Super Hornet????
lol "kamikaze USV"
otherwise known as a torpedo 😅
If you get a boat to distract it. Another boat can come from the opposite direction and the USV can be boarded!
Once an enemy is onboard they will shut down the USV and tow it away.
This issue has still not been addressed. 🤷♂️
BTW, I just made and uploaded to my TH-cam channel a video on that goes into more detail on my previous post.