Remove your personal information from the web at JoinDeleteMe.com/SUBBRIEF20 and use code SUBBRIEF20 for 20% off DeleteMe international Plans: international.joindeleteme.com
Good brief Aaron. Former submariner JO and NWDC battle lab developer familiar with NCW. A bit surprised you didn’t mention decision making loops, OOAA. NCW moves decision making closer to the edge. But units share command intent and force wide operational picture.
it’s cool to know about how modern warfare works nowadays. it’s a shame that our navy(Taiwanese navy) can only utilize the NTDS which is much less advanced than NATO forces. i can’t imagine how much we can do when there’s war between Taiwan and China.
@@Adventuregirl96 As a citizen and sailor of this nation, I don’t expect they would make any difference, especially the authority often makes wrong decisions. i am currently working on one of the frigates from the 1970s. i am sure what will happen once the war begins.
Hi sir Aaron, greetings from The Netherlands 🇳🇱. Hope you’re doing well and your fam. Haven’t been able to catch you live recently but love your updates always to rewatch. Thank you for your service and updates ❤️🫡
To me AEGIS Combat networking system was that special magic power that can turn a fleet of separate ships into one hive minded virtual super ship with a god like situational awareness. The fact it's decentralized makes it extremely hard to disrupt or defeat. I still think AEGIS is what the Chinese military fears most for these reasons.
Thanks Aaron. Fantastic presentation. Please consider doing more top level presentations like this. It’s really useful for those of us without a military background.
I do wonder how well this stuff will work against a more technology advanced rival like russia or China. Afghanistan and Iraq don't have signal jamming, gps spoofing, ECM or even sonar jammers. Our future adversaries do. We've seen this in Ukraine where our gps guided shells and rockets are missing wildly.
Our military is so cooked when the network goes down. An entire military built around satellites and when WW3 starts the satellites will be the first thing to go.
And it worked in Afghanistan. There were overall relatively few deaths over the whole duration. Sure, the Taliban at the end of the got in power again but this isn’t a function of not having enough military capability, but more that the target of democratisation in the manner the west envisioned was always doomed to fail. Getting out was always going to be ugly, that’s why Trump made this „deal“.
You want the supportive version of the missile guidance system. The one like the dog you grew up with, or the companion animal in fantasy. or like R2D2, or Data from Star Trek.
AI should include the endurance of the conflict to calculate the point of no return when warfare will become too expensive or unfeasible (only a few days i expect).
Hey Aaron, would you consider one of these style medium-form presentations on modern (hell, even Cold War era) EW hardware and practices/tactics for the unclassified layman?
Network Centric Warfare ? - or maybe "Achilles Centric Warfare". It's like a solution to defeat the technology is in the description of the technology? I'd say successful methodologies and doctrines have been in autonomous mode. Think "Terrorist Cells" etc. Remember Independence day movie? Once the Mothership was out, so was the threat. Perhaps a discussion is in order?
It provides such an incredible advantage it's worth for every military to implement it despite risks. That's like saying "anti air missiles exist so we shouldn't use any aircraft"
Remove your personal information from the web at JoinDeleteMe.com/SUBBRIEF20 and use code SUBBRIEF20 for 20% off
DeleteMe international Plans: international.joindeleteme.com
I got a good giggle out of the AI generated art at the start. The barrel smoke coming from the sighting scope was inspiring to say the least 🧐😍
What about the Radar mast wired up to the skif lol
Thank god, it's so nice to hear someone talk about how complex and frankly, mind-bending the actual right-now reality is. People need to know.
Good brief Aaron. Former submariner JO and NWDC battle lab developer familiar with NCW. A bit surprised you didn’t mention decision making loops, OOAA. NCW moves decision making closer to the edge. But units share command intent and force wide operational picture.
it’s cool to know about how modern warfare works nowadays. it’s a shame that our navy(Taiwanese navy) can only utilize the NTDS which is much less advanced than NATO forces. i can’t imagine how much we can do when there’s war between Taiwan and China.
Don't worry the RoC is working on Future Light Frigates. These should make a big difference.
@@Adventuregirl96Not really.
@@Adventuregirl96 As a citizen and sailor of this nation, I don’t expect they would make any difference, especially the authority often makes wrong decisions. i am currently working on one of the frigates from the 1970s. i am sure what will happen once the war begins.
The Iowa class battleships were the real hero's of the First Gulf War... I mean the coolness factor alone is beyond measure!
Excellent presentation. Thank you for your work.
Excellent briefing Aaron. Really informative.
Hi sir Aaron, greetings from The Netherlands 🇳🇱. Hope you’re doing well and your fam. Haven’t been able to catch you live recently but love your updates always to rewatch. Thank you for your service and updates ❤️🫡
I get "I wrote this script with ChatGPT" vibes from this video
Just typical military PowerPoint briefing.
AI Graphics too
Watch the rest of his stuff, and you'll see this guy knows what he's talking about.
@@emo-sup-sock I know he knows whats up I just dislike AI images
Yes, I agree very much. It feels very woolly and repetitive.
To me AEGIS Combat networking system was that special magic power that can turn a fleet of separate ships into one hive minded virtual super ship with a god like situational awareness. The fact it's decentralized makes it extremely hard to disrupt or defeat. I still think AEGIS is what the Chinese military fears most for these reasons.
Fascinating.
Network centric teamwork makes the C4ISR dream work.
Thanks Aaron. Fantastic presentation. Please consider doing more top level presentations like this. It’s really useful for those of us without a military background.
I do wonder how well this stuff will work against a more technology advanced rival like russia or China. Afghanistan and Iraq don't have signal jamming, gps spoofing, ECM or even sonar jammers. Our future adversaries do.
We've seen this in Ukraine where our gps guided shells and rockets are missing wildly.
Our military is so cooked when the network goes down. An entire military built around satellites and when WW3 starts the satellites will be the first thing to go.
@@johngalt5602 There’s a lot of redundancy with this stuff
@@moodogco Most UAVs use GPS or similar systems to navigate though
Good thing there are a lot of them, and more each week.
Wow. We’ve got the DoD’s network engineer in the comments. 😲
@@HolyNorthAmericanEmpire all of these drones have what's called inertial navigation.
Incredible.
Awesome, thanks.
Great vid JT
Tayfun OZBERK is a bull's eye for this subject. Congrats !
We tried technology in Afghanistan and it often failed see operation Anaconda. This is a possible major problem. If it goes down.....
And it worked in Afghanistan. There were overall relatively few deaths over the whole duration. Sure, the Taliban at the end of the got in power again but this isn’t a function of not having enough military capability, but more that the target of democratisation in the manner the west envisioned was always doomed to fail. Getting out was always going to be ugly, that’s why Trump made this „deal“.
You want the supportive version of the missile guidance system. The one like the dog you grew up with, or the companion animal in fantasy. or like R2D2, or Data from Star Trek.
AAron: What ever became of Modern Naval Warfare by the Maslas Brothers?
That sounds more like central desicions and central micromanagement taking over. Sometimes good, sometimes very bad.
what do you mean network centric warfare doesn't involve running an illegal starlink with rogue wifi on your navy destroyer?
AI should include the endurance of the conflict to calculate the point of no return when warfare will become too expensive or unfeasible (only a few days i expect).
Hey Aaron, would you consider one of these style medium-form presentations on modern (hell, even Cold War era) EW hardware and practices/tactics for the unclassified layman?
That would be really useful! I know bits and pieces - I think. Having Aaron explain it properly? Bliss.
Rescind DoD policy 3000.09! Power to the Edge!
This could have been a ten minute video. Like how many ways are there to explain realtime data sharing.
You've never had to sell 'training' as a product then 😂
Well, with China sabre rattling (not unheard of under Xi), hopefully we don't have to find out just how effective (or not) our naval doctrine is.
A submarine channels lead technical writer is called typhoon (sic)??? This is some mario-wario teir stuff
Mr Tayfun is Turkish I assume? He seems very knowledgeable.
Yep
Network Centric Warfare ? - or maybe "Achilles Centric Warfare". It's like a solution to defeat the technology is in the description of the technology? I'd say successful methodologies and doctrines have been in autonomous mode. Think "Terrorist Cells" etc. Remember Independence day movie? Once the Mothership was out, so was the threat.
Perhaps a discussion is in order?
NCW sounds like a HORRIBLE idea when you consider the new A.I. threat🤔🤔🤔
It provides such an incredible advantage it's worth for every military to implement it despite risks. That's like saying "anti air missiles exist so we shouldn't use any aircraft"
1K views in 1 hour bro fell off 💀