IL-2: Battle of Moscow - Ju 88 A-4

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 เม.ย. 2016
  • IL-2: Battle of Moscow - Ju 88 A-4
    Finally, The Ju 88 A-4 has arrived. And I am not disappointed at all.
    I hope you enjoy!
    Find me on,
    Patreon: / magztv
    Facebook: MagzGTV
    Steam: steamcommunity.com/groups/MagzTV
    Twitter: Magz@MagzGTV
    Big Red "Boomer" The Kangaroo, Channel Mascot Artwork designed by SemperMortem (BogRoll)
    For more of his amazing work check out his Deviant Art page!
    bog-roll.deviantart.com/
    Intro with thanks to Laurent Caccia.
    laurentcaccia.com
    Production Music courtesy of Epidemic Sound: www.epidemicsound.com
  • เกม

ความคิดเห็น • 179

  • @totalvvar
    @totalvvar 8 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    That Ju 88 crashing in the background had me in tears (at the start)

    • @morphius747
      @morphius747 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Hopit it was perfect, the destruction of the 2 planes and then the cherry on top

  • @therealCG62
    @therealCG62 8 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    I should really jump into IL-2 MP sometime.
    I actually really wish more WWII flight sims would have flyable bombers- and not just the fast zippy strike bombers, but medium and heavy bombers as well. I'd LOVE to be able to fly a B-17 out, join up with the bomber box, fly to a target and deliver my ordinance, then deal with whatever battle damage or fighter interceptors I take on the way home. I often hear the argument that heavy bombers are boring, but I wholly disagree- oftentimes the most fun I have in these sorts of games is flying a damaged bird back, trying to maximize the life of a smoking engine, and then either making a no-go-arounds emergency landing at my airfield, or finding a nice field somewhere and putting her down as softly as I can.

    • @MagzGTV
      @MagzGTV  8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      +Skele Boner I agree with you, These's a reason why before this my preferred bomber in IL-2 was the He 111. There is something special about flying the big medium and Heavy machines. Would love to see more of them in represented in sims in detail myself.

    • @IsaacKelly2
      @IsaacKelly2 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Skele Boner I agree. That's one of the most exiting things!

    • @boredlessgaming8548
      @boredlessgaming8548 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      B-17 the mighty eighth is a 2001 game where you fly b-17s to Europe. They are also making a new game called The Mighty 8th where you can also fly b-24s.

  • @TheRockstarFreak9
    @TheRockstarFreak9 8 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    "I think it might climb better than the bf-110"
    - MagzTV
    Don't tell me what to do!

  • @XogoWasTaken
    @XogoWasTaken 8 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    That stat card would confuse the hell out of the average WT player.

  • @saltdetected1756
    @saltdetected1756 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    i wonder how many Ju 88 top gunners imagined shooting down two fighters with both guns at the same time

  • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
    @MilitaryHistoryVisualized 8 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    MagZ + Il-2 + Ju 88... :) *dance* ... and a 109 and Ju 88 performing a classical German mating dance...

  • @YoshiKekw
    @YoshiKekw 8 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    Well at-least we now know that magz can read not just make amazing videos.

    • @MagzGTV
      @MagzGTV  8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      +Deividas Siuika lol, I had to read it all out. As a stat card it is impressive.

    • @nicolaic2468
      @nicolaic2468 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +MagzTV Man I wish we had that much information available in War Thunder, some of the guesstimates you have to make when flying out new planes in air RB are terrible

    • @YoshiKekw
      @YoshiKekw 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +MagzTV Totally agree and i think war thunder should have something like that as well, in something like "more info about the plane" section. But i don't think they will ever do it

  • @4tonnesoffury329
    @4tonnesoffury329 8 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    Clean up on IL2.

    • @kusugara
      @kusugara 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Took me a whILe

  • @Ming-Chan
    @Ming-Chan 8 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    War Thunder won't add such a detailed stat card to the Yak-3P for obvious reasons.

  • @saucejohnson9862
    @saucejohnson9862 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The bomb damaged your engines. Wouldn't be surprised if it killed a gunner or two either.

  • @wanderingwu6320
    @wanderingwu6320 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks a billion for your take-off explanation. Now it makes sense! I nearly gave up on trying to get the damn thing down the runway. All I ever did was donuts.

  • @GamerTubeHD
    @GamerTubeHD 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    love Your IL2 vids. I dont think that i could play this Game my self so its cool to watch someone who is as good as u.

  • @TheRockstarFreak9
    @TheRockstarFreak9 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Moaaaaar IL-2!

  • @ryanfreebody6881
    @ryanfreebody6881 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cool fact, it was part of the design to want to pull up out of a dive, it was designed that way just incase the pilot passed out while dive bombing.
    Same thing with the Stuka, I thought it was pretty cool that they designed it that way.

  • @carlosteran8114
    @carlosteran8114 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Amazing, I had a Great time flying that schnellbomber ( mine as weel A-4 1:48 soo nice). ;) I may say ya didn't use the open round radiator too good ;)

  • @fidan2fast
    @fidan2fast 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    0:20 and here, in the airport, their natural habitat, we can see the the Me109 and the Ju88 battling during mating season

  • @carlosteran8114
    @carlosteran8114 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I visit this from time to time, my best sofa...well, I put my Ju88A-4 around...And I do feel good !!!

  • @violinbird77
    @violinbird77 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    That beginning was ridiculously comical -- doesn't matter how realistic/intense a game tries to be, players will find a way to make s*** like that happen xD

  • @charliewood1680
    @charliewood1680 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I was watching a world war two documentary a long time ago and this German ju 88 pilot said that the ju 88 was really hard to take off fly and land

  • @totoritko
    @totoritko 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    16:00 No mate, that's because you're not trimmed for the dive speed. What you're experiencing is the natural tendency for aircraft to yo-yo around their trim speed. The rule is simple:
    *) aircraft nosing up: you're too fast for the trimmed speed, trim more nose-down (forward)
    *) aircraft nosing down: you're too slow for the trimmed speed, trim more nose-up (backward)
    I use this behavior in real world as well when practicing partial-panel emergencies with a covered up airspeed indicator. I don't need to see the ASI to know I'm speeding up or slowing down, I feel it on the controls.

    • @ryanfreebody6881
      @ryanfreebody6881 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Are you on about when the plane wants to pull up from a dive?
      It's actually designed to do that, exactly the same with Stuka, it's there incase the pilot passes out while performing a dive.

  • @spooder1371
    @spooder1371 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice video , keep up the great job , buddy !

  • @KYA022
    @KYA022 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Use the forward reticle for dive bombing. Roll over, nose down and if it has dive breaks like it does in 1946 use those.

  • @legendlewis1293
    @legendlewis1293 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Looks amazing

  • @jamesbrown5749
    @jamesbrown5749 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    As a former War Thunder player trying (poorly) to transition into IL2: BOS, I would love to see more similar content. Any IL2 video from you is in my immediate watch queue.

  • @ItalianRain2
    @ItalianRain2 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fantastic intro of derpness.

  • @SleeveBlade
    @SleeveBlade 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    hey magz, I love the landing part in il-2 really much, would love to see that. Maybe in the end when you're talking about other stuff, instead of the random flying part? just saying what I was thinking.

  • @tracytron7162
    @tracytron7162 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yeah my brain just died 12 seconds after you started reading that stat card

  • @daniele6477
    @daniele6477 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    beautiful cockpit model

  • @lostboy8814
    @lostboy8814 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Re take off,not sure about having the prop RPM's at 50% I find that if you push the stick forward to lift the tailwheel off the ground at around 70-90 Kmh,the aircraft will then be suitably balanced moving forward(ie not moving about too much laterally)before take off takes place at around 170-210 Kmh......buteach to their own I guess.

  • @JUNKERS488
    @JUNKERS488 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I just wish on single player mode you got a few extra points or Bonus points for being able to bring a wounded bird all the way back to home base with a safe landing. I have become pretty good at keeping a damaged bomber in the air since I'm not so good at avoiding enemy defenses. Lol.

  • @carlosteran8114
    @carlosteran8114 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    talk a lot but i did learne stuff of the junkers 88 so cheers mate , jejeje, maybe today Iĺl start to make my Ju88A-4 1:48, Revell one...looks like itś a beatifull stuff 4435 or something pieces...love it ;);)

  • @pezz_pezzer
    @pezz_pezzer 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Both of your recent IL-2 uploads have been awesome Magz! Thank you. I re-started Subnautica this week and WOW. That game has come a long way both visually and now with some interesting story touches delivered via the new comms station. But those killer Leviathans seems more abundant near Aurora so be careful. What do you think of the new way you have to find power blueprints and such instead of having them from the start?

  • @m0ther_bra1ned12
    @m0ther_bra1ned12 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Superb review as always Mags. This is now probably my favorite plane in the game. I was going to try and do a video but now what's the point. XD

    • @MagzGTV
      @MagzGTV  8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Motherbrain Jr There is always a point. Put your own ideas out there! Just because someone else covers something doesn't mean you cant as well. Shoot me a link after as well, Would love to watch it.

  • @sattakhim
    @sattakhim 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    More IL-2 please!!

  • @radical026
    @radical026 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Speaking of heavy fighters, I wonder if the heavy fighter variants of the Ju 88 will be added in the future

  • @Hedlum
    @Hedlum 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dear Magz. It's really cool you did a vid that was on a bomber. Have you ever considered doing the same in war thunder? (Maybe not so much on a specific bomber, but more so a guide in general.)

  • @Wandalen2
    @Wandalen2 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    I got no take off problems with my game. Open radiator 100% prop pitch 100%. Full throttle, no flaps.
    Pull back stick on 200kmh, gear up, prop pitch 80% trottle 75%. Fly to the tank is empty :)
    ~S~

  • @violinbird77
    @violinbird77 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Holy s***, WT desperately needs stat cards like this. I remember I hesitated playing WT because there was such lack of aircraft performance data displayed ingame, realizing that players with much higher experience will simply outperform me in every aspect because they know information that can only be learned through experience.
    I myself am a student pilot, and it is ridiculously imperative that I know every last digit for every part of the aircraft -- exactly like the ones you've read in this video.

  • @oliver-pk3xj
    @oliver-pk3xj 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Second
    ME: NO ONE GIVES 2 SHT
    You: BUT I POOPED 2 TIMES RIGHT NOW
    Me: ......

    • @fanofshrimp
      @fanofshrimp 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Robloxian Gamez How many strokes have you had?

    • @memeboi8880
      @memeboi8880 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Reed Noss the real question is what is he on?

  • @TheDrummingWarrior
    @TheDrummingWarrior 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Il 2, just what I needed :)

    • @Choward6969
      @Choward6969 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      I have seen you everywhere on TH-cam

    • @TheDrummingWarrior
      @TheDrummingWarrior 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Stephen Howard I guess we just watch the same stuff

    • @Choward6969
      @Choward6969 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Are you in the RAF

    • @TheDrummingWarrior
      @TheDrummingWarrior 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Stephen Howard no however I plan to be and I am in the RAF cadets, so I've spent a lot of time on RAF stations

    • @Choward6969
      @Choward6969 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well cool, I'm in the raaf

  • @glenblanton2969
    @glenblanton2969 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I fly the 88 a lot. It is fast and can even be deadly to enemy fighters.

  • @MagzGTV
    @MagzGTV  8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    IL-2: Battle of Moscow - Ju 88 A-4
    Finally, The Ju 88 A-4 has arrived. And I am not disappointed at all.
    I hope you enjoy!

    • @truslew8089
      @truslew8089 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Sleep < Magz

    • @shroomiesmuggins7628
      @shroomiesmuggins7628 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +MagzTV the gunner almost looks like he is sleeping. This game looks amazing, but I don't have a joystick.

    • @therealCG62
      @therealCG62 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +shroomies Muggins Save up $20-$30 (USD) and you can pick up a cheap three-axis stick with a throttle flapper- something like a 3dpro or something. Or hell, I've actually found used 3dpros in charity shops before for like $10 a piece.

    • @Siddich
      @Siddich 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +MagzTV The gunsight in this modell is actually there to aim your bombs in a dive. The Ju-88 should be able to dive like other Stukas. Whilst the Ju-88 A4 was used as a bomber there were no fighter versions of this plane.The RLM was obsessed with dive bombers...even the He-177 should dive...yes...Göring was a fool.

    • @telecleez
      @telecleez 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +MagzTV The Ju-88 is my favorite German Bomber in WT wish I had a joystick to play IL-2 (I know I don't need one but I would rather use a stick than a M&K in a game like this)

  • @okonkwojones
    @okonkwojones 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does the dive bombing sight (top of the cockpit) with the really annoying "drop now" buzzer work at this point?

  • @timur22993
    @timur22993 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Magz, can you perform an over 70 degree dive bombing in either War Thunder or IL-2? Or make a tutorial. I keep failing at that when I attempt it in War Thunder, unless it's a base I am bombing, and I really want to learn doing it properly. That is ofc if doing such thing against tank columns is what planes like Ju 87 did.

  • @trevorphilips56
    @trevorphilips56 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey, Magz. Is there any chance you'll do a video similar to this one on the P-40 E-1 in IL 2: Battle of Moscow? It seems like you've done most of the other ones accept for that one.

  • @swayingGrass
    @swayingGrass 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    When you'r reading the stats and specifications, my brain.exe stopped working. Anyway, what is maximum turn and maximum performance turn?

    • @Silavite
      @Silavite 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Indra Ida Bagus Virage time. It is a measure of how quickly the aircraft can turn 360 degrees without loosing any speed or altitude.

  • @Kommradable
    @Kommradable 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    The reticle is there because it's a dive bomber if I remember right

    • @masterdynamo6457
      @masterdynamo6457 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, no Stuvi sight ingame sadly. But that's what it's for.

  • @pedror598
    @pedror598 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wish i had this game ;-;

  • @aeroangrymoose
    @aeroangrymoose 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh my god, that intro....

  • @MrDagassman
    @MrDagassman 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hopefully someone can clear something up for me. Looking to get into IL-2 but I don't quite understand, is battle of moscow a separate game from battle of stalingrad or is it an expansion? I've looked at the website for the game and am still somewhat confused.

  • @tracytron7162
    @tracytron7162 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    18:50 To be fair, it’s a good habit to get into though

  • @cuckiller6314
    @cuckiller6314 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    The intro lol

  • @Telsion
    @Telsion 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Magz, what is your opinion on the F-80 being at 8.0? I am currently gathering some footage for it, and I am anxious to hear what your opinion is about it

  • @uncletimo6059
    @uncletimo6059 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand that's why I fly in IL2 1946. In that game I fly in a squadron, with 8 to 30+ airplanes just on my side per mission. This "Rambo" style lone wolf flying is ahistorical and is very silly.

    • @gezurarbeit3097
      @gezurarbeit3097 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Uncle Timo
      There's 84 players on Il-2 wings of liberty server almost every evening.

  • @kjetilhjertholmjensen163
    @kjetilhjertholmjensen163 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is my opinion/experience: The Ju88 may have better performance than He111 but it's far more forgiving with the engines. Seems to me engines in the Ju88 is pushed much closer to the performance limit than the He111 engines. Maybe it's just me but I have a nasty tendency to blow the Ju88 engines about the time the gear retracts, that's not the case when I use the Heinkel. - BTW: "stat card"? Where? Didn't find any. Links? -
    Awesome video. Subscribed :)

  • @Banjalo
    @Banjalo 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello Magz.

  • @MrDaiki_
    @MrDaiki_ 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    I play DCS a lot but I don't have il2. How do the two games compare and is this worth getting? Also I don't have pedals is this a problem, although I can fly the Huey without them in DCS so I guess I should be fine.

  • @21owlgirl72
    @21owlgirl72 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do you remember a Delfi being your gunner for a short while?

    • @MagzGTV
      @MagzGTV  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Tristan Dwyer I do, I think he shot me first if I recall :P

    • @21owlgirl72
      @21owlgirl72 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Shot you first?

  • @jonasw10
    @jonasw10 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ok, could someone please point out the difference between Battle of Moscow and Battle of Stalingrad?

  • @MbfLproductions
    @MbfLproductions 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    that intro xD

  • @Asgar1205
    @Asgar1205 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    i'm surprised by your observations concerning the takeoff. when i take off, i just put it on 100% rpm give it throttle fairly quickly and off i go. i agree however that you have to use brakes to stay on course until you have some speed.
    i also agree, the Ju-88 is now the best bomber in game o7

    • @MagzGTV
      @MagzGTV  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +HerrStein Every time I tried 100% RPM and throttle the aircraft span regardless of breaks. This is the only way I could reliably get the aircraft into the air with the top bomb loads.

    • @MilitaryAviationHistory
      @MilitaryAviationHistory 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +MagzTV Was surprised about this too. I kept my RPM with the Ju-88 as I would with all planes, then throttle up steadily and off she goes. Obv a few adjustments with brakes but she gets speed quickly and then runs a fine line. Doesn't really matter tho, as long as the runway is long enough any way works ;)

    • @Asgar1205
      @Asgar1205 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      i think in IL-2 personal experience is highly effected by the peripherals you use.

  • @pl3101
    @pl3101 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello sim flyers!
    Is it worth getting IL-2 Battle of stalingrad to fly it with mouse controls, to see if the game fits my style? Ofc, if i like it i might get a joystick eventually.
    Regards.

    • @groggygreg7416
      @groggygreg7416 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      no.. also you need head tracking, like track ir.
      without it dogfighting is no fun!!!!

  • @messerschmitt7156
    @messerschmitt7156 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do you know if the BoM expansion works with steam version BoS? Moscow looks interesting but I'm hesitant on whether I should get it or not for that reason.

  • @loslosbaby
    @loslosbaby 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm just a noob observer curious about IL-2....but wow, seems like nobody ever jinks/bobs/weaves on exfil from targets....and the shots just come on in...

  • @Dollar1712
    @Dollar1712 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can someone help me? On the wings of liberty server how do I bring up the In- Game- Map? Sorry, but I'm a noob. :/

    • @MagzGTV
      @MagzGTV  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Dollar1712 by default I think the key is 'O" as in the letter O not the number 0

    • @Dollar1712
      @Dollar1712 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +MagzTV thx!

  • @TechnoTwin98
    @TechnoTwin98 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would you saw Battle of Mosow is worth getting?

    • @MagzGTV
      @MagzGTV  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Oscar Palfelt If you are interested in all the planes and the time period yes.

  • @Telsion
    @Telsion 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    does Semper also make other mascottes on request?

  • @floh667
    @floh667 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    looks like bombers are much more fun in il-2 than in war thunder

    • @MagzGTV
      @MagzGTV  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +floh667 Very much so, In some ways I enjoy flying bombers more than fighters in IL-2, The experience of flying something so vulnerable but so important to the battle into places where almost everything is out to kill you, I honestly wish more people would try it. It's vastly different experience to flying a fighter.

    • @floh667
      @floh667 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +MagzTV And it still doesn't look this vulnerable than In War Thunder. I mean in War Thunder the ju-88 is basically dead meat.Sadly I have no Joystick and not trackIR.

  • @FlyingBoxHead
    @FlyingBoxHead 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tailwheel lock for takeoff?

  • @warmowed
    @warmowed 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    so the gun in the cockpit doesn't work yet?

    • @MagzGTV
      @MagzGTV  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +warmowed No it works but it's not manned by the pilot, The bombardier down at the pilots feet stands up and takes control of the MG when it is needed.

  • @pkpgpk
    @pkpgpk 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    If they give the ju 88 gun modifications then I'm going to just HAVE to buy this game... Even as it is I am barely managing to resist buying it D:

    • @pranavpatel3194
      @pranavpatel3194 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Great game, just need a pretty decent gaming PC and a joystick if you want to play on most of the servers, you can't play mouse aim on alot of servers

    • @pkpgpk
      @pkpgpk 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      PRANAV PATEL Well I have BoS. Admittedly my computer can BARELY run it, but I get it to work. And my extreme 3d pro does well enough. I just wish I had waited for Moscow instead of buying Stalingrad, I love the 109 E4, Bf 110 and Ju 88. The only thing for the Germans that I like to fly in Stalingrad is the Stuka... Maybe a bit of the IL-2 when I'm feeling like shooting some rockets etc.

  • @larryxiang822
    @larryxiang822 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Didn't that Ju-88 have 2 MG 131 in the rear? Or is that war thunder messing with my brain

    • @MagzGTV
      @MagzGTV  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Drink and Fly No you saw correctly, 2.

    • @nindger4270
      @nindger4270 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Drink and Fly Weirdly enough my usual go-to-source for this kind of stuff says the A-4 should have 1 MG 81 in the windshield operated by the pilot, and 1 MG 131 operated by the bombardier (or whatever that guy's called, not a native speaker), with MG81 and MG 81Z (twin barrel version) as rear armament. Which is neither what I see in the video nor what you're suggesting; source might be wrong, obviously. But later versions (G-1/P-1/S-1) apparently had MG 131s in the back, yes.

    • @MagzGTV
      @MagzGTV  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Robin Schuhmacher Some did, The version we get in IL has 2xMG81 in the rear as well, The windshield MG and the belly gun are the same as you listed.

  • @jjtheone1232
    @jjtheone1232 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    someone once told me the Ju88 was a stuka. I had to laugh a lot.

    • @cop-killer-
      @cop-killer- 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      well I mean it is but...

    • @4tonnesoffury329
      @4tonnesoffury329 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Bf 109 K-4 Its made by the same company but two very different planes.

    • @cop-killer-
      @cop-killer- 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +4 Tonnes of Fury nah

    • @cnoxey6898
      @cnoxey6898 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Indeed it was a stuka. The word "Sturzkampfbomber", short form "Stuka" (= divebomber) officialy described every german dive bomber, as the Junkers Ju 88 was Build as one. In the linguistic usage of german pilots and propaganda, the word was only used for dive bombers of type Junkers Ju 87.

    • @masterdynamo6457
      @masterdynamo6457 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      It IS a Stuka by definition, just not *the* Stuka.

  • @macaronisalad3038
    @macaronisalad3038 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    play the h8k series I. war thunder Try to land them any where without ripping it's right wing off and taking off with both wings

  • @The_Sniffi
    @The_Sniffi 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is IL-2 battle of moscow a standalone game? or a part of battle of stalingrad?

    • @MagzGTV
      @MagzGTV  8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Norwegian Septiceye Shared client but stand alone.

    • @HerraTohtori
      @HerraTohtori 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Norwegian Septiceye It's sort of similar to DCS, but instead of releasing aircraft individually, the developers of IL-2 Sturmovik release aircraft and maps in "battle packs". The first, initial release was "Battle of Stalingrad", the upcoming one is "Battle of Moscow". Both can be bought separately, either as regular or premium variant. Premium variant gives you access to two extra aircraft in both packs.

  • @Andy-dk2qf
    @Andy-dk2qf 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Which state do u live in Aus?

  • @Max-kj7qg
    @Max-kj7qg 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello Magz, I was wondering if you live stream and do donations? I love the content on the Channel, and the Orange Doom does a thing where viewers can donate to him to benefit the channel. Sorry if this comes off as rude, but I just want to help you put out more amazing content in any way I can! Anyways if you ever need a DCS P51, A10c, or f15 wingman I'll be in the skies.

    • @MagzGTV
      @MagzGTV  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Max Marshall G'day mate, Don't worry it didn't come across as rude at all. I would truly love to live stream sadly the internet available in my area is simply not good enough for it. Even uploading videos takes hours and hours. I am hoping the network will be updated in this area later this year but until that happens its not an option.
      As for donations the only thing I really have at the moment is my Patreon. www.patreon.com/MagzTV
      I created it as a donations bin as currently all other you tube supported donations services are not available to Australian content creators and other services such as paypal give out personal information.
      I am actually in the process of working out a way of updating my Patrion to be more than just a donations bin for those that support me so you asked at a good time, I was planning on an announcement later next week if its ready. Thank you for the support and I am glad you enjoy the content mate.

    • @Max-kj7qg
      @Max-kj7qg 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +MagzTV Great news! Thanks for the reply I'll check it out tommorow!

  • @jonathanmorris503
    @jonathanmorris503 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How much would you recommend this compared to warthunder sim.... That's a poorly worded question I hope it makes since

    • @SleepySkull1
      @SleepySkull1 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      +Jonathan Morris Il-2.
      Because it's not War Thunder.

    • @nindger4270
      @nindger4270 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Jonathan Morris If you have the 50 or so bucks on hand, probably IL2...if only for the fact that you don't have to deal with the horrible matchmaking-BR-shenanigans

  • @realMenta
    @realMenta 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Anyone can help me? I like plane simulation games but war thunder just don`t fit in a simulation game for me at least,i tought buying this game but i`m not sure because of the price.Any suggestion?

    • @TechnoTwin98
      @TechnoTwin98 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +MrLucas0945 I used to play war thunder and felt just like you. This game is amazing, but if you think it's too expensive you could wait for a sale.

    • @realMenta
      @realMenta 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      yeah i think i`m going to wait for a sale but how many aircrafts have in the game?

    • @MilitaryAviationHistory
      @MilitaryAviationHistory 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Rise of Flight has a free trial (three free planes), Cliffs of Dover (+Team Fusion mod) is availible for a budget price, DCS has free content and then you have BoS if it goes on sale. Plenty of choice

    • @MagzGTV
      @MagzGTV  8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +MrLucas0945 As Oscar said there is the option of a sale, Or if you want something sooner and don't mind a drop in graphics quality there is IL2: Cliffs of Dover and/or IL2: 1946.
      You can pick both of those up for around $10usd on steam I think.

    • @realMenta
      @realMenta 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you all!

  • @johngarvey4378
    @johngarvey4378 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thinking about purchasing this game, is it optimized well?

    • @MagzGTV
      @MagzGTV  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +John Garvey Sadly no that's one of its downsides. If you can run WT on movie you should be fine but if you have to go below that to maintain FPS you will have issues with IL-2.

    • @johngarvey4378
      @johngarvey4378 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +MagzTV alright thanks

  • @edmundsdemonds8309
    @edmundsdemonds8309 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    I did everything exept being a single engine fighter

    • @edmundsdemonds8309
      @edmundsdemonds8309 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      *it

    • @ryap1
      @ryap1 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Edmunds demonds no he did everything exept being a single engine fighter one day he will get his wish.

  • @JBLaOHeI
    @JBLaOHeI 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    subnautica subnautica subnautica subnautica subnautica subnautica subnautica subnautica subnautica subnautica subnautica subnautica subnautica subnautica subnautica starcitizen

  • @TheDrummingWarrior
    @TheDrummingWarrior 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    How much does this game cost?

    • @gabrielcooper2044
      @gabrielcooper2044 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +RAF Benson Too much... il2sturmovik.com/battle-of-moscow/

    • @TheDrummingWarrior
      @TheDrummingWarrior 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Gabriel Cooper you're right, I'll just stick with war thunder and dcs for now

    • @Asgar1205
      @Asgar1205 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +RAF Benson lol...you have DCS where you pay 50 bucks for one plane but 50 bucks for 8 is too much :D

    • @totoritko
      @totoritko 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +HerrStein The $50 aircraft models for DCS are extremely high fidelity. IL-2 might provide you a good enough, but ultimately superficial experience of the machine. The expensive models in DCS go to excruciating detail in simulating pretty much every facet of every system of the real aircraft. Not to mention, modern aircraft are usually much more complicated on the systems side and as such require a lot more coding.
      Notice Magz said this was his first dive bombing run in the Ju-88. If this were a high-fidelity aircraft model in DCS, he'd spend several hours just studying the available weapons modes on that particular aircraft model.
      It's the depth of the model. DCS goes much further and that takes a lot more time to code properly.

    • @TheDrummingWarrior
      @TheDrummingWarrior 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +HerrStein I got them on sale, super cheap

  • @carlosteran8114
    @carlosteran8114 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    not you didn't make it...