@dude look at her butt H90 delirious it's not dumb, and I see no problem with it. English isn't my mother tongue but the distinction between "If" and "When" completely makes sense to me, and it's surprising and weird to me that some people from the west seems to have a hard time making sense of it.
@@BlitzWalkthrough yes, it does. And it's not the words' fault nor does make them "stupid" if you can't make sense of it. Probably says more about you than them.
“There’s people who watch these videos but don’t play the game” Honestly not surprised, you make these videos really entertaining and it’s so organized. Your voice is also very easy to get attached to as well
I found some of his videos on my reccomended last december and ever since then I haven't stopped watched his videos even if I had never touched the game in my life Hell, I don't even play card games/deck builders of any kind just because of how bad I am at planning this things
This also applies to fusion cards that use materials from the deck, apparently. Clearly Future Fusion, Brilliant Fusion and to a lesser extent Neos Fusion, Red Eyes Fusion and Fusion Destiny thanks to Anaconda, those STILL haven't been enough to stop Konami from printing yet another broken one, and probably the strongest of the bunch ever since Future Fusion in Branded Fusion.
@@joanaguayoplanell4912 well tbf that’s more of a Verte being too op problem. If these spells couldn’t use mats from the deck or some alternate way then they’d be heavily handicapped since Fusion is already the worse extra deck type mechanically
@@streetgamer3452 many decks prefer to hard-draw those cards. Even REF in certain decks that can work around the summon limit like Subterror and Eldlitch. Branded Fusion can't even be used by Anaconda.
@@joanaguayoplanell4912 so the 2 decks that prefer to hard draw it? Because majority of decks still need at least their normal summon and Subterror isn’t even seen as good these days because it’s Dragoon turbo at this point, also branded fusion Can be used by anaconda
Oh man, every time I see Electrumite I'm reminded of that one video of Jerome trying to explain why they banned her since they didn't want Pendulum decks to become more and more soup like, all the while a Dragon Link player was vomiting his entire monster line up on the field for the whole world to see. The irony was so thick, you could use a sledgehammer to break through it.
@@number-qx1kw remember, sell product. Gotta protect the moneymaker, THEYLL never ban Needlefiber, but if they have to ban every pendulum card, they would in a heartbeat
@@johnathanlemus5584 yeah so remember when a poll by Konami was made for our favourite link monster, maybe the card that leads to massive extension and combos wasn't the best choice, maybe the card that crippled synchro decks because of the over balancing of tuners wasn't the most intellectual play
21:01 I think you mean if they changed its materials to “Metalfoes” monsters, because “Heavymetalfoes” just refers to the link monsters. If it required 2 “Heavymetalfoes” monsters, it’d be pretty much impossible to bring it out because the only other one is Amalgam whose arrows point left and right.
In the OCG Astrograph and many other pendulum magician cards are limited. Even obscure cards like Harmonizing Magician. OCG meta is control focused not combo. Which is why Max C and Skill Drain are allowed at 3. Sky Striker mobilize Engage is Semi Limited in the OCG
Really the major problem of Summon Sorceress is that it's generic to summon and summons generically. (In fact if we're going to be realistic that's the problem with a lot of extra deck monsters and the ideal fix to the entire game would be making it so they all require at least one specific monster, type, attribute, or archetype). Instead of the banishing, limiting it's summon and effect to Spellcasters would be a fairly big blow and it would boost a few decks that would greatly appreciate it rather than just being another generic insert. If there needed to be another effect, locking you into only being able to special summon Spellcasters for the rest of the turn (or even during the turn you used that effect at all) would be a huge limit that would also not entirely shut down the decks that need the help.
@@marco4317 not really, selene special summons from gy whereas sorceress summons from deck which is busted. And selene requires counter removal to activate.
Thank you for explaining Pendulum Summon. I am the few that watched all of your vids but actually never played the modern YGO. Tbh, the reason I was confused with pendulum summon because it feels like it is generating so much board advantage for two cards
Isolde should have a limitation in her materials to being "2+ Noble Knight or Infernoble Knight monsters", because she is WAY too strong as a warrior generic support Halqifibrax must be banned, without doubt
@@user-ashborn16 It's worth remembering the context that at the time she was released she (and a bunch of the LVP1 Links) were intended to be generic type/mechanic supporting links to mitigate the restrictions in MR4. The effects were supposed to be related to the archetypes they're a part of (Isolde sending equips, Halq doing things on your opponent's turn for example) but generic enough that they still functioned as type support. Honestly I think Isolde is fine right now. Yes, summoning potentially any warrior from the deck has incredible potential, but due to the sheer number of garnets you have to run to get anything of a decent level, it had better win you the game there and then. With the key pieces of warrior combo decks banned, Isolde isn't really an issue. Though if we ever get a powerful low level warrior it could be trouble.
I’ll trade Verte Anaconda onto the ban list to get Electrumite off the list - Verte’s probably gonna be put there soon, might as well try and get something off in exchange
Honestly there are a lot of broken link 2, I'd ban them all lol Like electrum, halq, agarpain, Isolde, Cherubini, verte, get rid of all this crap and we're all happy 😂
I still find it kinda weird that Pendulums go to the extra deck instead of the graveyard. I've gotten more familiar with how modern summoning mechanics work, but Pendulums going to the extra deck still feels like it's being different "just because", rather than having an intuitive reason as to why.
The reason why is so you can Pendulum summon them back after they've destroyed. It really feels like Konami just had a whole bunch of ideas for summoning mechanics that they just decided to cram into Pendulums in all honesty. It really feels like I discover something new with Pendulums every time I read about them.
@@theandroid5282 Pendulums are a weird mishmash of the original monsters that could be played as spells in the anime (when they translated some manga spells as monsters) and permanent reviving cards. Sprinkle in extradeck shenanigans and mass summoning based on levels.
Small wonder that most pendulum decks aren't fun. They tend to work best for me when either they only have 1 effect or when they all have 1 simple shared effect, pendulum or monster, and the other effect something else.
@@davidtowers1863 try solfachords, they are tons of fun and rather simple! But you won't top any ycs with em 😅 you probably wouldn't top any ycs with any pend deck for that matter, so there's that.
there’s actually a pretty good reason for that and it’s the same reason why limiting how many pend monsters can be summoned from the extra deck has heavily nerfed the mechanic, you go -2 to even start the combo to begin with so being able to cycle the pend monsters u put into the spell/trap zones into the extra deck and then being able to pend summon them made it viable
Neat, I've been wanting a Top 10 cards that are good because of their cost, and didn't realize Denglong and Number 95 would also count. Even Electrumite could be counted since destroying Pendulum scales is often a benefit.
If they made Number 95, banish cards instead, then that could really up my Gren Maju deck. I am already using 107, C107, for effects and beatstick, 4500 is hard to beat over.
I am currently a duel links only player who watches these videos because I am curious about the tcg and also because I want to learn about future cards and mechanics that may make it into duel links (Also your videos are great). The pendulum tutorial was helpful to me and probably to others like me, especially since u make Duel links videos too. Also I have a DL-TCG crossover video idea: Top ten cards banned in the TCG that are unlimited in Duel Links. Because of the lower power level of DL you might think at first glance that there wouldn’t be any cards that qualify for this list but there are actually a good number for various reasons. Here is the list of all of the ones that I know of in no particular order: -Ancient Fairy Dragon -Block Dragon -Glow-Up Bulb -Jet Synchron -Blackwing Steam The Cloak -Eclipse Wyvern -Orcust Harp Horror -Samsara Lotus -Smoke Grenade of the thief It might make sense to also include a few cards that are only limited in the TCG like -Infernity Archfiend -Miscellaneousaurous -Gem Knight Master diamond -Into the void If he doesn’t make the video or people are curious, below is a list of explanations for why the banned cards aren’t banned in DL. -Ancient Fairy Dragon: Not as many broken field spells to abuse, although starting with a field spell skill u can get an easy search of a necrovalley which is probably the most practical. For floaters we are basically limited to the FA ones, and FA isn’t meta at the moment. -Block Dragon: Same reason it wasn’t banned in the TCG till recently. Rock sux, though not nearly as much historically in DL. Block dragon decks were pretty strong when we still had grass. Speaking of which if you made this list a year and a half ago ‘that grass looks greener‘ would be number one easily. -The Halqifibrax Brigade (Glow-Up Bulb, Jet Synchron, Blackwing Steam the Cloak) these are not banned because no Halqifibrax. We don’t have destrudo but if we did it would get banned lol. Steam the cloak probably deserves a special mention in the video for being abusable with other links. -Eclipse Wyvern: less OP dragons and less graveyard dragons. Though they did give us Levianeer for some god forsaken reason, and that is almost always what you search with Eclipse Wyvern. If that gets banned in the TCG it will be added to the list. -Orcust Harp Horror: No Dingirsu and like half of the rest of the archetype. Best use in DL is with Desperado Barrel Dragon -Samsara Lotus: No consistent FTK yet. Probably the best we have right now is to use flare metal dragon and summon Slifer to opponents field to repeatedly destroy samsara and activate Flare Metal’s Effect. -Wind-Up Carrier Zenmaity: No hunter so no hand destruction. I think we are probably also missing some other wind ups but that is the big one. This card did facilitate a one card Fortune Lady Every play (a synchro that is difficult to summon in DL outside of certain decks) that was part of getting a skill nerfed but that is about it. -smoke grenade of the thief: no infernobles basically, was decent in the early days when storm + wild tornado was a very common removal option. This is already the longest comment ever so Here is a quick rundown of the limited cards. -Infernity Archfiend: Missing support/Extra deck options -Miscellaneousaurous: way less dino support. -Gem Knight MD: limiting lapis was enough to rein in ftk in DL. -Into the void: less graveyard effects, harder to meet hand size requirement with 4 card starting hand.
I started watching your videos as pretty much a genwunner with old yugioh DM knowledge and a faint idea of the GX-era stuff. Used you and duel links to catch up to the modern era
Dark Matter needs restriction on only sending dragon "Galaxy" "Photon" as well as only once per turn with limit to one copy. The attacking twice is good but Galaxy already has prime that can shoot up to crazy levels of damage and others that do a lot too like possibly Tachyon attacking twice or Ciphers stealing monsters and the Cipher that did the stealing still being able to attack directly.
I know a lot has been said about how great and informative these videos are, but I'll have to commend the choice of background music. I don't know what music database DL uses for his videos, but I can't stress enough what an enjoyable experience watching his videos is and a big part of that is due to his choice of music. He must've been great at making presentations back in college.
I was just waiting for Dark Matter Dragon because it lets me talk about this broken combo you could pull off with it. It involved Amorphage Goliath and Arkbrave Dragon. Now it’s been a while since I’ve used Arkbrave, so I don’t remember it’s full effect. I do, however, remember Goliath’s effect. Basically, what you would do is set up to summon Dark Matter, use its mill effect and send any three dragon cards including Amorphage Goliath to the graveyard. You would then special summon Goliath using Arkbrave’s effect, which would lock your opponent out of summoning from their extra deck indefinitely. This affected you too, but since you had Dark Matter out, it didn’t matter. Unless your opponent got rid of Goliath, they could not use their extra deck unless they used Amorphage’s. This one combo basically crippled their entire strategy.
I've noticed on alot of top 10s or banned cards, Herald of the Arc Light is usually mentioned along side a card with easy special summons for why they are so good. What would happen if Arc Light was banned? does a "top 10 cards that would change Combos if banned" be an interesting top 10 to work with?
Yes but it would be a mess to organize such a complex video. You first need to choose a card (Herald of the arc light? So be it) then you need to think of every combo that uses it On the top of my head: Nekroz kaleidoscope send Herald for Unicore then search whatever you need Denglong negate then summon Herald Gishki hand loop summon Zaborg then dump the fuck out of your extra Edit Diviner send Herald search Herald of perfection
A lot of the cards are problematic without arc light anyways. The advantage you get from linkross is enough to force an interruption which is the unhealthy part.
@@voltingmaster5458 cope. Konami’s hatred for pendulums is unreal. They won’t bring back electrumite not astrograph until it’s to the point where pendulums is dead to the ground
Apparently, someone at Konami's office has stated that Electrumite makes every pendulum archetype play the same, hence why they don't want to unban it.
Yep and as long Jerome doesnt change his mind - it wont come back. More likely that Astrograph Sorcerer could return tbh. But i think Pend will get Skullcrobat Joker back first. They should ban Nightingale, limit SK Dragon Starving Venom and Astrograph Sorcerer. That would help pendulum so much and since SK SV only copies to the end phase - without a FTK/OTK possibility it would be just a "powerful" extender that Pendulum needs a lot. If you leave it on the field , it would just be a 2800 Beatstick with piercing on your opponents turn.
And now after her ban , every pendulum deck right now is just needle fiber selene turbo Love how they completely ignore Isolde and needle fiber making decks play the same Totally not biased
Electrumite is one of the card that should just be archetype specific if they don’t want people to play it outside the archetype in everything. When would Konami learn to put restriction on cards so they can’t be used widely outside their purpose, make this material only Metalfoe monsters, Union carrier can only equip Union monster….
@@kingfatih That might be the case, ironically astrograph sorcerer could comeback to 1 to test the waters and it’s just another extender. It would help. Maybe he’s next
for the effect of Galaxy eyes I would have preferred to put "send 3 'galaxy' monsters to the graveyard, You can't use graveyard-related effects for the rest of the turn." or change the entire effect
I vote that we refer to verte anaconda, electrumite, halquifibrax, and the bujin link collectively as the “dimension links” since they are effectively generic support for their summoning type and have the same summoning requirements as the mechanic
There are some cards that people predict could be taken off in the near future. Duellogs for the most part has covered cards that we think will remain banned and so fulfills it’s spot as a banned card. It would be a bit awkward going over a card that was banned only for it to get unbanned a few weeks later. It doesn’t invalidate its power, it just looks less credible.
@@someonline Not invalidating any of your points overall but I thought I would offer a little known tidbit of advice to consider. The words it's and its are one of, if not the only exception to the possessive contraction methodology. When you want to say something is possessed by 'it', you would say 'its', instead of the usual rule of the apostrophe before the 's'. 'It's' like this is the contraction for 'it is', so while I'm well aware it's an easy mistake to make for anyone familiar with the usual possessive strategy, I thought it would be beneficial for folks to be made aware of that. Again, not invalidating your message, It just would make it look more credible to incorporate. Before you ask, no I'm not an English teacher, which is why my paragraph wall probably looks pretty sloppy. I may in fact be a bit of a jerk, though.
I loved the yang zing arctype when I played. Was literally the deck I had the most fun with. I was running it with metalfols which was surprisingly consistent.
By the way, on the topic of what to cover next: "why certain cards have been limited/semi-limited for ages" would be interesting topic too. And: "Which cards would be insanely op if they were a different type/attribute".
Union Carrier is supposed to help the equip effects of Union monsters, but similar to Electrumite with any Pendulums, it's not restricted to Union monsters. If only the summoning were restricted to Union monsters, then it could be unbanned or limited.
So basically 90% of the banned monsters could be fixed by being non generic. I think of would solve in general most problems if they would stop printing strong generic cards and concentrate more on individual archetypes with specific strong cards.
summon sorceress can also have the restriction that instead of 2+ monsters of the same type except tokens to be 3 non-link monsters of the same type except tokens. Besides to only use yang zing as materials, denglong could also send yang zings to gy instead of any wyrm. for dark matter it can also have the restriction that it can only be special summoned once each turn the alternate way and the dragon it mills will be only photon or galaxy monsters. With electrumite i would also say those changes.
Even with ur suggested restrictions, the ftk used originally with Summon Sorc would still work, the one with gellenduo and red eyes flare. Also didn't see it til this video, but Endymion and Astro standing in the same pose, even the hand. Electrumite makes pendulum decks break even
Yet another video provong to me that all "When" effect cards should be errata'd to "If" and if that would make some cards overpowered, then the banlist can be used. I'd love to see a video showing how powerful some "When" cards would become if they got an errata to their effect to replace "When" with an "If."
i have a suggestion for your next video: Top 10 early archetypes or cards that received support later or still receive support in the TCG! it'd be cool to know what those archetypes are i know like 2 i wonder if they are more
Yea, Summon Sorceress was out for a year IF you got the Jump promo which was only available in NA and hard to get. The rest of us plebs only got to play around with the card for about 5 months as the regular release was in december 2018.
You are so good at what you do. Thanks for putting out such great content. I don’t even understand the advanced mechanics this game or even play for that matter but you break it down so well !
Every single extra deck monster on the ban list 100% deserves it's place there. (And yes, that includes colossus.) Except electrumite. Pendulums just don't function under master rule 5 without it, and there aren't any over powered pendulum decks for it to abuse. Endymion is the best pendulum deck, but even that wasn't winning tournaments even with electrumite.
Honestly electrumite can stay banned for all i care. Especially since metalfoes got another link monster in blazing vortex. I'd rather have more links for other pendulum archetypes. Where are my performapal and odd-eyes links konami?!
Speaking as one of the peeps who *doesn't* play the game (but casually pays attention because I just like studying game design), I appreciate the explanation for Pendulums. It really is just... one of the least intuitive 'main' summoning mechanics in my experience. The other summon types are fairly self explanatory, and have single sentence explanations for how they happen - Ritual: follow instructions on the cards. Fusion: follow instructions on the card(s), using materials listed. Synchro: Levels must add up exactly. XYZ: materials used are placed under card instead of going to the graveyard. Link: Link rank of summon must be at least equal to combined total of materials links (non links are 1), and to somewhere with arrows. And a lot of these are well conveyed just reading the cards, even for a non-player. Pendulums are just... there's a lot of dangling user interface stuff that just has no explanation unless you sit down and have it explained to you (by a person or by the book)
Pendulum got heavily nerfed is kinda an understatement, consider the fact that the entire link monster and master rule 4 is aimed just to hit pendulum mechanic
Would you consider after this series is done doing the same thing, but for limited cards? I think it could be pretty interesting seeing that middle line where the cards are super good, but not quite completely broken and hearing about why that is.
Even with your erata for Summon sorceress, it would be an easy 1 monster link 5 with halquifibrax. And even if halquifibrax is banned, having a way to turn any link 3 into a link 4 with no cost would be broken.
Well yes Dark Matter Dragon got banned when we got the Guardragons, but thats because they made Gandora FTK more consistent - in which Number 95 played a key role. So the FTK is the reason it got actually banned. The fix of not activating the cards it sends that turn wouldnt work, because the worst thing Number 95 can setup is the Amorphage Lock and Arkbrave Dragon would activate its effect in the opponents standby phase to special summon Amorphage Goliath. I wonder how much of a problem that would be these days.
If you have a pendulum monster in each pendulum zone (left and right spell/trap zones, ones with the pretty red and blue diamonds), you can summon five monsters from your hand. This also works with pendulum monsters from the extra deck, but with master rule 4 restrictions.
limiting Denglong and Elecrumite to types rather than just the specific archetype would probably be the more useful way to nerf the cards since it gives you more flexibility. Heck, you could also use Metalfoes' unique status as Normal, Pendulums to restrict it that way
Other fixes for each card (I think) 1: Summon Sorceress; remove its generic-ness; limiting it to spell casters of equal or lower level would probably be fine since it already negates the effects. It also makes it unable to be used as a link summon. 2: Denglong, Locking them into wyrm or Yang-Zings, would keep it strong, but only for Yang-Zings 3: Number 95. Make it a hard once per turn and making it lock you into Galaxy-Eyes seems reasonable enough. 4: Electromite: Hard once per turn, banish the pendulum on the field instead of destroying it, make it a link 3, and give it a third down arrow. That way, it's more of a cost to pay, harder to bring out, and helps the pendulum more.
IMO, a pretty simple way to unban Dark Matter would be to errata it with a hard once per turn and an archetype lock. You can only use either effect once per turn and only once that turn, and you can't special summon monsters from the extra deck except Galaxy-Eyes monsters.
The biggest offense of Dark Matter Dragon is that the triple foolish is the COST of the effect. Your opponent has no fucking recourse against this effect.
I understand why number 95 was banned, but I miss using it along side cipher dragon. Opponent has Infinity, I can take control of it off of cipher dragon, summon dark matter, then use it to mill out Ancients, Arkbrave, and divine dragon lord felgrand. I honestly hope this card comes off the list one day via errata or even power creep
That’s pretty interesting when you think about the extra deck history Fusions and rituals were awful and even into the GX Era, they didn’t know what they were doing even if you can technically say they were improving. Synchros probably had the better mix of awful synchros at its start but also really good ones too and it’s not like fusions and rituals were on a consistently good track so obvious synchros would rule overall by default. Xyz were no different to start but yea you can tell konami started to force their hand to make sure the next Mechanic got used with the synchro bans and powering they’d down only for Xyz to have even more cards banned than synchros could ever have. And then pendulums happened and made the Xyz jerking look mild before Master rule 4 and links came and made Pendulums and the Pepe debacle look tame. It’s no wonder they’ve decided to block off from having a new summoning mechanic and opted to going backwards in time with Rush Duels and even keeping it out of the West. They’ve just become more and more reckless and I don’t think Yugioh could’ve survived a 3rd time of the game being made a joke because konami insisted on making the latest summoning mechanic back breaking.
Number 95 is the funniest card for zombie players. Back then you would just banish a solitaire and a spiritmaster in order to destroy one card your opponent controls and then special summon spiritmaster using solitaire. with the modern zombie support, you can also banish even more cards that would give you advantage.
15:15 "You cannot use the effects of a card with the same name until the end of the turn" LOL , people will just go back to "Amorphage Goliath" with "Arkbrave Dragon" just like previous meta.
well, i've played the clasic one until the last psp series, i think 5ds 6th series ? well, still your video is really have a perfect organizing, straight to the point about what you would review, and its soo relaxing...
I'm honestly of the opinion that a LOT of cards that have generic materials should be errata-ed to at least partially require monsters within the archetype that they are part of. Perhaps not entirely requiring them, but at least one monster from those archetypes, whether it's the tuner or non-tuner for synchros, at least one monster for links, and so on. Would perhaps also go a long way to make those cards less of absolute staples, as noted for stuff like Denglong. In fact, if they wanted to really go the way of lots of errata, they could even balance it out with some positive erratas, releasing some of both groups in sets. An example of the positive errata I can think of would be changing Gusto Falco to an "if" rather than the current "when."
Electrumite should now really come back. It's just not that op anymore. In the current format pendulum sees almost no play in the current meta and I think bringing back electrumite wouldn’t change that much.
![Explaining All Banned Main Deck Monsters in YuGiOh [Part 3]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/lWSut4nBWbA/mqdefault.jpg)
![Explaining All Banned Main Deck Monsters in YuGiOh [Part 3]](/img/tr.png)
![Explaining All Banned Extra Deck Monsters in YuGiOh [Part 5]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/B3UBhQSQ9W8/mqdefault.jpg)
![Explaining All Banned Extra Deck Monsters in YuGiOh [Part 2]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ysQFR7ORoIQ/mqdefault.jpg)
If Yugioh has taught me anything, it's the importance of the difference between 'When" and "If"
@dude look at her butt H90 delirious Does this stupid if/when difference even exist in the OCG or is it just bad translation?
@@BlitzWalkthrough i think it does, because if it did not it wouldnt be a problem, being able to be solved by rulings.
It does, "If" = 場合 and "When" = 時 in the OCG
@dude look at her butt H90 delirious it's not dumb, and I see no problem with it. English isn't my mother tongue but the distinction between "If" and "When" completely makes sense to me, and it's surprising and weird to me that some people from the west seems to have a hard time making sense of it.
@@BlitzWalkthrough yes, it does. And it's not the words' fault nor does make them "stupid" if you can't make sense of it. Probably says more about you than them.
“There’s people who watch these videos but don’t play the game”
Honestly not surprised, you make these videos really entertaining and it’s so organized. Your voice is also very easy to get attached to as well
And profile pic heps too
@@ivan-pk1wq TRUE
I found some of his videos on my reccomended last december and ever since then I haven't stopped watched his videos even if I had never touched the game in my life
Hell, I don't even play card games/deck builders of any kind just because of how bad I am at planning this things
I don't play YuGiOh other than those old ass GX era DS games lol
i have never in my llife played yugioh and he is easily one of my most watched youtubers
"How many times do we have to teach you this lesson old man!?"
Konami putting SS from the deck on ED monsters: "I love the young people"
This also applies to fusion cards that use materials from the deck, apparently. Clearly Future Fusion, Brilliant Fusion and to a lesser extent Neos Fusion, Red Eyes Fusion and Fusion Destiny thanks to Anaconda, those STILL haven't been enough to stop Konami from printing yet another broken one, and probably the strongest of the bunch ever since Future Fusion in Branded Fusion.
@@joanaguayoplanell4912 well tbf that’s more of a Verte being too op problem. If these spells couldn’t use mats from the deck or some alternate way then they’d be heavily handicapped since Fusion is already the worse extra deck type mechanically
@@streetgamer3452 many decks prefer to hard-draw those cards. Even REF in certain decks that can work around the summon limit like Subterror and Eldlitch.
Branded Fusion can't even be used by Anaconda.
@@joanaguayoplanell4912 so the 2 decks that prefer to hard draw it? Because majority of decks still need at least their normal summon and Subterror isn’t even seen as good these days because it’s Dragoon turbo at this point, also branded fusion Can be used by anaconda
@@joanaguayoplanell4912 Red-eyes needs all the help it can get
Oh man, every time I see Electrumite I'm reminded of that one video of Jerome trying to explain why they banned her since they didn't want Pendulum decks to become more and more soup like, all the while a Dragon Link player was vomiting his entire monster line up on the field for the whole world to see.
The irony was so thick, you could use a sledgehammer to break through it.
But remember what the Hack Jerome Mchale said “It limits card design”
@@johnathanlemus5584 ironic after the tcg banned like 5 or 6 tuners because of needle fiber yet that card doesn't "limit card design"
@@number-qx1kw remember, sell product. Gotta protect the moneymaker, THEYLL never ban Needlefiber, but if they have to ban every pendulum card, they would in a heartbeat
@@johnathanlemus5584 yeah so remember when a poll by Konami was made for our favourite link monster, maybe the card that leads to massive extension and combos wasn't the best choice, maybe the card that crippled synchro decks because of the over balancing of tuners wasn't the most intellectual play
Jerome's opinion about electrumite is just extremely unreasonable and just looks like a meaningless excuse for personal hatred for pendulums...
Top 10 cards that would be broken if they couldn't miss timing
Peten the dark clown 🤡❤️
hot red dragon archfiend king calamity
Naturia rocky boi in adamancipator maybe
Gusto Falco
Black Rose dragon, Laval Handmaiden
TheDuelLogs: "Can Electrumite be unbanned? Probably yes"
Trif: "LET'S GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111111111ONE"
PEND BEST DECK
8 NEGATES THROUGH ANY DISRUPTION EVERY TURN PEND BEST DECKKKK
That idiot is a reason why Electrumite should never come back all by itself
It’s only because Konami TCG hates pendulums, like Kevin Tewart and Jerome Mchale, “it limits cars design!!!!!”
Konami should, if they'll let Pendulums rot without new support, at least un-ban the old cards they may put them in "Rogue" status
TheDuelLogs: "There's only one more video before I finish every banned extra deck monster."
Konami:
Honestly this upcoming list doesn't have any ED slots on the to hitlist.
Thank you for explaining how the pendulum monsters work. Im not really a yu gi oh player, but i do enjoy watching those videos. :)
21:01 I think you mean if they changed its materials to “Metalfoes” monsters, because “Heavymetalfoes” just refers to the link monsters. If it required 2 “Heavymetalfoes” monsters, it’d be pretty much impossible to bring it out because the only other one is Amalgam whose arrows point left and right.
no
You could do it but like, the amount of work wouldn't be worth it lol
@@who-the-fuckgivesafuck me
In the OCG
Astrograph and many other pendulum magician cards are limited. Even obscure cards like Harmonizing Magician.
OCG meta is control focused not combo.
Which is why Max C and Skill Drain are allowed at 3.
Sky Striker mobilize Engage is Semi Limited in the OCG
First of all : NON of the endymion cards are restricted in the ocg
Second of all: engage is at 2 yes but they have only 1 kagari
They also have starving vemon at three which can copy electrumite's effect , which allows you to use her effect again
@@number-qx1kw but endymion can combo of with only 1 electrumite unlike pend magicians which are like unplayable with their banlist restrictions
I know they play differently but wow I never thought of it like that. Eye opening
This comment aged so well.
The series has been so good so far and I can’t wait to watch the last video for the series.
Really the major problem of Summon Sorceress is that it's generic to summon and summons generically. (In fact if we're going to be realistic that's the problem with a lot of extra deck monsters and the ideal fix to the entire game would be making it so they all require at least one specific monster, type, attribute, or archetype).
Instead of the banishing, limiting it's summon and effect to Spellcasters would be a fairly big blow and it would boost a few decks that would greatly appreciate it rather than just being another generic insert.
If there needed to be another effect, locking you into only being able to special summon Spellcasters for the rest of the turn (or even during the turn you used that effect at all) would be a huge limit that would also not entirely shut down the decks that need the help.
If she summoned only spellcasters she would basically be just another Selene
@@marco4317 not really, selene special summons from gy whereas sorceress summons from deck which is busted. And selene requires counter removal to activate.
Top 10 monsters with effect "if this card leaves the field"
Think there’s already a list like that, except those effects are referred to as floating effects
Old Sangan and Witch topping...
@@shis1988 these are "if this card is sent to gy"
@@riteskaterdude yeah but most of them was spells and traps
Asla piscu
17:26 that's literary me
Its just I love how that you telling us exactly how mechanics works and it's really cool to see that
Damn, I forgot that Summon Sorceress existed.
Thank you for explaining Pendulum Summon. I am the few that watched all of your vids but actually never played the modern YGO.
Tbh, the reason I was confused with pendulum summon because it feels like it is generating so much board advantage for two cards
Konami, please just unban Electrumite, it's far less broken than some Link 2s which are at 3 like Isolde or Halq. *cries*
Isolde should have a limitation in her materials to being "2+ Noble Knight or Infernoble Knight monsters", because she is WAY too strong as a warrior generic support
Halqifibrax must be banned, without doubt
@@user-ashborn16 you don't need to add the "or infernoble knight " , "infernoble knight" monsters already count as "noble knight" monsters
@@user-ashborn16 It's worth remembering the context that at the time she was released she (and a bunch of the LVP1 Links) were intended to be generic type/mechanic supporting links to mitigate the restrictions in MR4. The effects were supposed to be related to the archetypes they're a part of (Isolde sending equips, Halq doing things on your opponent's turn for example) but generic enough that they still functioned as type support.
Honestly I think Isolde is fine right now. Yes, summoning potentially any warrior from the deck has incredible potential, but due to the sheer number of garnets you have to run to get anything of a decent level, it had better win you the game there and then. With the key pieces of warrior combo decks banned, Isolde isn't really an issue. Though if we ever get a powerful low level warrior it could be trouble.
I’ll trade Verte Anaconda onto the ban list to get Electrumite off the list - Verte’s probably gonna be put there soon, might as well try and get something off in exchange
Honestly there are a lot of broken link 2, I'd ban them all lol
Like electrum, halq, agarpain, Isolde, Cherubini, verte, get rid of all this crap and we're all happy 😂
I still find it kinda weird that Pendulums go to the extra deck instead of the graveyard. I've gotten more familiar with how modern summoning mechanics work, but Pendulums going to the extra deck still feels like it's being different "just because", rather than having an intuitive reason as to why.
The reason why is so you can Pendulum summon them back after they've destroyed. It really feels like Konami just had a whole bunch of ideas for summoning mechanics that they just decided to cram into Pendulums in all honesty. It really feels like I discover something new with Pendulums every time I read about them.
@@theandroid5282 Pendulums are a weird mishmash of the original monsters that could be played as spells in the anime (when they translated some manga spells as monsters) and permanent reviving cards. Sprinkle in extradeck shenanigans and mass summoning based on levels.
Small wonder that most pendulum decks aren't fun.
They tend to work best for me when either they only have 1 effect or when they all have 1 simple shared effect, pendulum or monster, and the other effect something else.
@@davidtowers1863 try solfachords, they are tons of fun and rather simple! But you won't top any ycs with em 😅 you probably wouldn't top any ycs with any pend deck for that matter, so there's that.
there’s actually a pretty good reason for that and it’s the same reason why limiting how many pend monsters can be summoned from the extra deck has heavily nerfed the mechanic, you go -2 to even start the combo to begin with so being able to cycle the pend monsters u put into the spell/trap zones into the extra deck and then being able to pend summon them made it viable
Neat, I've been wanting a Top 10 cards that are good because of their cost, and didn't realize Denglong and Number 95 would also count. Even Electrumite could be counted since destroying Pendulum scales is often a benefit.
If they made Number 95, banish cards instead, then that could really up my Gren Maju deck. I am already using 107, C107, for effects and beatstick, 4500 is hard to beat over.
Thunder Dragons would probably abuse that, too.
I am currently a duel links only player who watches these videos because I am curious about the tcg and also because I want to learn about future cards and mechanics that may make it into duel links (Also your videos are great). The pendulum tutorial was helpful to me and probably to others like me, especially since u make Duel links videos too.
Also I have a DL-TCG crossover video idea:
Top ten cards banned in the TCG that are unlimited in Duel Links.
Because of the lower power level of DL you might think at first glance that there wouldn’t be any cards that qualify for this list but there are actually a good number for various reasons.
Here is the list of all of the ones that I know of in no particular order:
-Ancient Fairy Dragon
-Block Dragon
-Glow-Up Bulb
-Jet Synchron
-Blackwing Steam The Cloak
-Eclipse Wyvern
-Orcust Harp Horror
-Samsara Lotus
-Smoke Grenade of the thief
It might make sense to also include a few cards that are only limited in the TCG like
-Infernity Archfiend
-Miscellaneousaurous
-Gem Knight Master diamond
-Into the void
If he doesn’t make the video or people are curious, below is a list of explanations for why the banned cards aren’t banned in DL.
-Ancient Fairy Dragon: Not as many broken field spells to abuse, although starting with a field spell skill u can get an easy search of a necrovalley which is probably the most practical. For floaters we are basically limited to the FA ones, and FA isn’t meta at the moment.
-Block Dragon: Same reason it wasn’t banned in the TCG till recently. Rock sux, though not nearly as much historically in DL. Block dragon decks were pretty strong when we still had grass. Speaking of which if you made this list a year and a half ago ‘that grass looks greener‘ would be number one easily.
-The Halqifibrax Brigade (Glow-Up Bulb, Jet Synchron, Blackwing Steam the Cloak) these are not banned because no Halqifibrax. We don’t have destrudo but if we did it would get banned lol. Steam the cloak probably deserves a special mention in the video for being abusable with other links.
-Eclipse Wyvern: less OP dragons and less graveyard dragons. Though they did give us Levianeer for some god forsaken reason, and that is almost always what you search with Eclipse Wyvern. If that gets banned in the TCG it will be added to the list.
-Orcust Harp Horror: No Dingirsu and like half of the rest of the archetype. Best use in DL is with Desperado Barrel Dragon
-Samsara Lotus: No consistent FTK yet. Probably the best we have right now is to use flare metal dragon and summon Slifer to opponents field to repeatedly destroy samsara and activate Flare Metal’s Effect.
-Wind-Up Carrier Zenmaity: No hunter so no hand destruction. I think we are probably also missing some other wind ups but that is the big one. This card did facilitate a one card Fortune Lady Every play (a synchro that is difficult to summon in DL outside of certain decks) that was part of getting a skill nerfed but that is about it.
-smoke grenade of the thief: no infernobles basically, was decent in the early days when storm + wild tornado was a very common removal option.
This is already the longest comment ever so Here is a quick rundown of the limited cards.
-Infernity Archfiend: Missing support/Extra deck options
-Miscellaneousaurous: way less dino support.
-Gem Knight MD: limiting lapis was enough to rein in ftk in DL.
-Into the void: less graveyard effects, harder to meet hand size requirement with 4 card starting hand.
I started watching your videos as pretty much a genwunner with old yugioh DM knowledge and a faint idea of the GX-era stuff. Used you and duel links to catch up to the modern era
As a returning player, explaining mr4 pendulums here really helped. I haven't played competitively since Qli released for context.
Dark Matter needs restriction on only sending dragon "Galaxy" "Photon" as well as only once per turn with limit to one copy. The attacking twice is good but Galaxy already has prime that can shoot up to crazy levels of damage and others that do a lot too like possibly Tachyon attacking twice or Ciphers stealing monsters and the Cipher that did the stealing still being able to attack directly.
I know a lot has been said about how great and informative these videos are, but I'll have to commend the choice of background music. I don't know what music database DL uses for his videos, but I can't stress enough what an enjoyable experience watching his videos is and a big part of that is due to his choice of music. He must've been great at making presentations back in college.
I was just waiting for Dark Matter Dragon because it lets me talk about this broken combo you could pull off with it.
It involved Amorphage Goliath and Arkbrave Dragon. Now it’s been a while since I’ve used Arkbrave, so I don’t remember it’s full effect. I do, however, remember Goliath’s effect.
Basically, what you would do is set up to summon Dark Matter, use its mill effect and send any three dragon cards including Amorphage Goliath to the graveyard. You would then special summon Goliath using Arkbrave’s effect, which would lock your opponent out of summoning from their extra deck indefinitely.
This affected you too, but since you had Dark Matter out, it didn’t matter. Unless your opponent got rid of Goliath, they could not use their extra deck unless they used Amorphage’s. This one combo basically crippled their entire strategy.
Good times
Electrumite is banned because Konami hates Pendulums
BUT THAT DOESN’T MATTER CUZ PEND BEST DECK LETS GOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!
Master Duel, some banned cards, UNBANNED
Meanwhile, Galaxy-Eyes Dark Matter which is less stronger than Rhongo and True Ruler
STILL BANNED!
I've noticed on alot of top 10s or banned cards, Herald of the Arc Light is usually mentioned along side a card with easy special summons for why they are so good. What would happen if Arc Light was banned? does a "top 10 cards that would change Combos if banned" be an interesting top 10 to work with?
Yes but it would be a mess to organize such a complex video.
You first need to choose a card (Herald of the arc light? So be it) then you need to think of every combo that uses it
On the top of my head:
Nekroz kaleidoscope send Herald for Unicore then search whatever you need
Denglong negate then summon Herald
Gishki hand loop summon Zaborg then dump the fuck out of your extra
Edit
Diviner send Herald search Herald of perfection
@@thepoweroftheweed2215 Drytron sends arc light with diviner, too
Unlikely. Herald of the Arc Light supports both Synchros and Rituals most especially. It's not a hard card to out by any means.
A lot of the cards are problematic without arc light anyways. The advantage you get from linkross is enough to force an interruption which is the unhealthy part.
Konami unbanning Heavymetalfoes would mean that they would have to admit they don't hate Pendulums, so I doubt it'll happen
The meta has evolved to the point where there are threats far greater than pendulums.
@@voltingmaster5458 cope. Konami’s hatred for pendulums is unreal. They won’t bring back electrumite not astrograph until it’s to the point where pendulums is dead to the ground
Pendulums aren’t good enough in the tcg anymore but when they are released in duel links they will change the game a lot
All Electrumite needs is to be at 1 imo, really hope it comes back
Apparently, someone at Konami's office has stated that Electrumite makes every pendulum archetype play the same, hence why they don't want to unban it.
Yep and as long Jerome doesnt change his mind - it wont come back.
More likely that Astrograph Sorcerer could return tbh. But i think Pend will get Skullcrobat Joker back first.
They should ban Nightingale, limit SK Dragon Starving Venom and Astrograph Sorcerer. That would help pendulum so much and since SK SV only copies to the end phase - without a FTK/OTK possibility it would be just a "powerful" extender that Pendulum needs a lot. If you leave it on the field , it would just be a 2800 Beatstick with piercing on your opponents turn.
And now after her ban , every pendulum deck right now is just needle fiber selene turbo
Love how they completely ignore Isolde and needle fiber making decks play the same
Totally not biased
Electrumite is one of the card that should just be archetype specific if they don’t want people to play it outside the archetype in everything. When would Konami learn to put restriction on cards so they can’t be used widely outside their purpose, make this material only Metalfoe monsters, Union carrier can only equip Union monster….
@@kingfatih That might be the case, ironically astrograph sorcerer could comeback to 1 to test the waters and it’s just another extender. It would help. Maybe he’s next
@@robinlinh I do agree that konami should stop making these monsters generic but generic sells that's why link vrains 1 and 3 are better than 2
welcome to another Episode of "Cards that should have never been printed.. Today: Summon Sorceress!" :P
for the effect of Galaxy eyes I would have preferred to put "send 3 'galaxy' monsters to the graveyard, You can't use graveyard-related effects for the rest of the turn."
or change the entire effect
After You explain all Banned Cards, You should talk about All Errata'd cards
Rip Chaos Emperor and Crush Card, we loved you while you lasted
5 videos only for necrovalley
Imperial Order might be the 1st errata'd card to be unbanned and then banned again because floodgates are more or less not fun.
I vote that we refer to verte anaconda, electrumite, halquifibrax, and the bujin link collectively as the “dimension links” since they are effectively generic support for their summoning type and have the same summoning requirements as the mechanic
Am i missing something or the "Why is it banned" for main deck monsters is not completed yet? If so, when will you continue to do them?
I'm going to finish that one last.
There are some cards that people predict could be taken off in the near future. Duellogs for the most part has covered cards that we think will remain banned and so fulfills it’s spot as a banned card. It would be a bit awkward going over a card that was banned only for it to get unbanned a few weeks later. It doesn’t invalidate its power, it just looks less credible.
@@someonline Not invalidating any of your points overall but I thought I would offer a little known tidbit of advice to consider. The words it's and its are one of, if not the only exception to the possessive contraction methodology. When you want to say something is possessed by 'it', you would say 'its', instead of the usual rule of the apostrophe before the 's'. 'It's' like this is the contraction for 'it is', so while I'm well aware it's an easy mistake to make for anyone familiar with the usual possessive strategy, I thought it would be beneficial for folks to be made aware of that. Again, not invalidating your message, It just would make it look more credible to incorporate.
Before you ask, no I'm not an English teacher, which is why my paragraph wall probably looks pretty sloppy. I may in fact be a bit of a jerk, though.
@@Yakshimara it’s just a minor typo
@@someonline It is, indeed! Thank you for incorporating it all the same!
Thanks for explaining Pendulums! I didn't even know how far off my assumptions about the mechanics were lol
I loved the yang zing arctype when I played. Was literally the deck I had the most fun with. I was running it with metalfols which was surprisingly consistent.
Get it on master duel.
@@danharvey4875 I did lol
By the way, on the topic of what to cover next: "why certain cards have been limited/semi-limited for ages" would be interesting topic too. And: "Which cards would be insanely op if they were a different type/attribute".
A whole video of "Why Malicious should be kept at 2"
Wait so that how pendulum work, I thought how pendulum work is watching triff making 69 negate through any handtraps.
0:34 the text says "...opponent's *out* of the field" instead of side.
oof
oof
oof
oof
oof
Summon Sorceress is back bois.
she got an errata tho.
Union Carrier is supposed to help the equip effects of Union monsters, but similar to Electrumite with any Pendulums, it's not restricted to Union monsters. If only the summoning were restricted to Union monsters, then it could be unbanned or limited.
Can't wait to see Dragun here
Thanks for explaining pendulums. I haven't played Yu-Gi-Oh since the XYZ era, and they always confused the hell out of me.
So basically 90% of the banned monsters could be fixed by being non generic. I think of would solve in general most problems if they would stop printing strong generic cards and concentrate more on individual archetypes with specific strong cards.
but then with no generic cards theres no deck building anymore you just pick all the cards from your archetype
@@fajitasevian5027 *facepalm*
@@fajitasevian5027 uh..... Thats the point of archetypes and balancing mate.
Non-Once per turn effect: *Exists*
Tryhards: "I can milk you"
summon sorceress can also have the restriction that instead of 2+ monsters of the same type except tokens to be 3 non-link monsters of the same type except tokens. Besides to only use yang zing as materials, denglong could also send yang zings to gy instead of any wyrm. for dark matter it can also have the restriction that it can only be special summoned once each turn the alternate way and the dragon it mills will be only photon or galaxy monsters. With electrumite i would also say those changes.
I was kinda caught off guard when you summoned all those pendulum monsters in that replay but I guess I wasn't paying attention to link arrows.
Even with ur suggested restrictions, the ftk used originally with Summon Sorc would still work, the one with gellenduo and red eyes flare.
Also didn't see it til this video, but Endymion and Astro standing in the same pose, even the hand. Electrumite makes pendulum decks break even
Yet another video provong to me that all "When" effect cards should be errata'd to "If" and if that would make some cards overpowered, then the banlist can be used.
I'd love to see a video showing how powerful some "When" cards would become if they got an errata to their effect to replace "When" with an "If."
i have a suggestion for your next video: Top 10 early archetypes or cards that received support later or still receive support in the TCG! it'd be cool to know what those archetypes are i know like 2 i wonder if they are more
Yea, Summon Sorceress was out for a year IF you got the Jump promo which was only available in NA and hard to get.
The rest of us plebs only got to play around with the card for about 5 months as the regular release was in december 2018.
You are so good at what you do. Thanks for putting out such great content. I don’t even understand the advanced mechanics this game or even play for that matter but you break it down so well !
they've must've changed how pendulums work when they added the link monster zone because before then you could just summon em all ery time.
17:39
Channeling his Inner Triffgaming
Every single extra deck monster on the ban list 100% deserves it's place there. (And yes, that includes colossus.)
Except electrumite. Pendulums just don't function under master rule 5 without it, and there aren't any over powered pendulum decks for it to abuse. Endymion is the best pendulum deck, but even that wasn't winning tournaments even with electrumite.
Honestly electrumite can stay banned for all i care. Especially since metalfoes got another link monster in blazing vortex. I'd rather have more links for other pendulum archetypes. Where are my performapal and odd-eyes links konami?!
Speaking as one of the peeps who *doesn't* play the game (but casually pays attention because I just like studying game design), I appreciate the explanation for Pendulums.
It really is just... one of the least intuitive 'main' summoning mechanics in my experience. The other summon types are fairly self explanatory, and have single sentence explanations for how they happen - Ritual: follow instructions on the cards. Fusion: follow instructions on the card(s), using materials listed. Synchro: Levels must add up exactly. XYZ: materials used are placed under card instead of going to the graveyard. Link: Link rank of summon must be at least equal to combined total of materials links (non links are 1), and to somewhere with arrows.
And a lot of these are well conveyed just reading the cards, even for a non-player.
Pendulums are just... there's a lot of dangling user interface stuff that just has no explanation unless you sit down and have it explained to you (by a person or by the book)
Pendulum got heavily nerfed is kinda an understatement, consider the fact that the entire link monster and master rule 4 is aimed just to hit pendulum mechanic
More so every mechanic. Not just pendulum. Sucks that Master Rule 5 didn’t change crap for pendulums.
After everything they did to finish off pendullum the least they could do is allow electruumite back.
Would you consider after this series is done doing the same thing, but for limited cards? I think it could be pretty interesting seeing that middle line where the cards are super good, but not quite completely broken and hearing about why that is.
As one of the people who has never had any exposure to YuGiOh before, thank you for the extra explanations lol
Even with your erata for Summon sorceress, it would be an easy 1 monster link 5 with halquifibrax.
And even if halquifibrax is banned, having a way to turn any link 3 into a link 4 with no cost would be broken.
Electrumite did nothing wrong at 1! Konami TCG must bring her back to 1!
Well yes Dark Matter Dragon got banned when we got the Guardragons, but thats because they made Gandora FTK more consistent - in which Number 95 played a key role. So the FTK is the reason it got actually banned.
The fix of not activating the cards it sends that turn wouldnt work, because the worst thing Number 95 can setup is the Amorphage Lock and Arkbrave Dragon would activate its effect in the opponents standby phase to special summon Amorphage Goliath. I wonder how much of a problem that would be these days.
Thanks for the Pendulum Summon tutorial. I don't play Yu-Gi-Oh since Xyz and I also don't get anything about Link Summon.
Thanks for explaining Pendulum monsters.
After the explanation of how pendulum summoning works I still have absolutely no idea how it works.
If you have a pendulum monster in each pendulum zone (left and right spell/trap zones, ones with the pretty red and blue diamonds), you can summon five monsters from your hand. This also works with pendulum monsters from the extra deck, but with master rule 4 restrictions.
limiting Denglong and Elecrumite to types rather than just the specific archetype would probably be the more useful way to nerf the cards since it gives you more flexibility. Heck, you could also use Metalfoes' unique status as Normal, Pendulums to restrict it that way
Limiting denglong is useless because its an needlefiber target
Other fixes for each card (I think)
1: Summon Sorceress; remove its generic-ness; limiting it to spell casters of equal or lower level would probably be fine since it already negates the effects. It also makes it unable to be used as a link summon.
2: Denglong, Locking them into wyrm or Yang-Zings, would keep it strong, but only for Yang-Zings
3: Number 95. Make it a hard once per turn and making it lock you into Galaxy-Eyes seems reasonable enough.
4: Electromite: Hard once per turn, banish the pendulum on the field instead of destroying it, make it a link 3, and give it a third down arrow. That way, it's more of a cost to pay, harder to bring out, and helps the pendulum more.
IMO, a pretty simple way to unban Dark Matter would be to errata it with a hard once per turn and an archetype lock. You can only use either effect once per turn and only once that turn, and you can't special summon monsters from the extra deck except Galaxy-Eyes monsters.
You are a hero, just a hero dude.....
Free my girl electrumite, she did nothing wrong man, she did nothing wrong whatsoever.
Explaining every errata (that wasn’t just a wording change) necrovalley can probably just have it’s own episode
Denglong also let you go into VFD/TKC super easy in dinos as well
DuelLogs: 17:21
me who's been playing yugioh for years now and still refuses to learn how pendulum works: um....yeah that looks totally broken yes
Well, it's clearly not that broken since there are 0 relevant Pendulum Decks in the metagame right now or for the past year and a half.
Top 10 flip monster cards 🌯
Bruh i play the game and i STILL dont know how tf pendulums work lmao
You could probably fix Denglong by just locking it to only wyrm monsters, as so it could be used with Swordsoul and tenyi
This series is amazing!
Neat list video! Thanks for uploading!
Yoooo pend best deck! Konami is stupid, bring electrumite back, make pendulum greater again
I can't belive I've been marathoning videos about a tcg I've never actually played
The biggest offense of Dark Matter Dragon is that the triple foolish is the COST of the effect. Your opponent has no fucking recourse against this effect.
Not gonna lie I actually had no idea how pendulum summons worked, so thank you for the explanation.
I understand why number 95 was banned, but I miss using it along side cipher dragon. Opponent has Infinity, I can take control of it off of cipher dragon, summon dark matter, then use it to mill out Ancients, Arkbrave, and divine dragon lord felgrand. I honestly hope this card comes off the list one day via errata or even power creep
Love this series!
Link summon is just contact fusion with less specific materials. Change my mind.
That’s pretty interesting when you think about the extra deck history
Fusions and rituals were awful and even into the GX Era, they didn’t know what they were doing even if you can technically say they were improving. Synchros probably had the better mix of awful synchros at its start but also really good ones too and it’s not like fusions and rituals were on a consistently good track so obvious synchros would rule overall by default. Xyz were no different to start but yea you can tell konami started to force their hand to make sure the next Mechanic got used with the synchro bans and powering they’d down only for Xyz to have even more cards banned than synchros could ever have.
And then pendulums happened and made the Xyz jerking look mild before Master rule 4 and links came and made Pendulums and the Pepe debacle look tame. It’s no wonder they’ve decided to block off from having a new summoning mechanic and opted to going backwards in time with Rush Duels and even keeping it out of the West. They’ve just become more and more reckless and I don’t think Yugioh could’ve survived a 3rd time of the game being made a joke because konami insisted on making the latest summoning mechanic back breaking.
Number 95 is the funniest card for zombie players. Back then you would just banish a solitaire and a spiritmaster in order to destroy one card your opponent controls and then special summon spiritmaster using solitaire. with the modern zombie support, you can also banish even more cards that would give you advantage.
"Like Magical Musketeer Max"
"What? I've never heard if this card."
"And I'm sure most of you have never even heard of this card."
"Oh......"
15:15 "You cannot use the effects of a card with the same name until the end of the turn"
LOL , people will just go back to "Amorphage Goliath" with "Arkbrave Dragon" just like previous meta.
well, i've played the clasic one until the last psp series, i think 5ds 6th series ?
well, still your video is really have a perfect organizing, straight to the point about what you would review, and its soo relaxing...
I'm honestly of the opinion that a LOT of cards that have generic materials should be errata-ed to at least partially require monsters within the archetype that they are part of. Perhaps not entirely requiring them, but at least one monster from those archetypes, whether it's the tuner or non-tuner for synchros, at least one monster for links, and so on. Would perhaps also go a long way to make those cards less of absolute staples, as noted for stuff like Denglong.
In fact, if they wanted to really go the way of lots of errata, they could even balance it out with some positive erratas, releasing some of both groups in sets. An example of the positive errata I can think of would be changing Gusto Falco to an "if" rather than the current "when."
Love these videos, keep them coming
Only real ones know that dark matter is originally from the zexal manga
Please do a video series of Top 10 cards "signature" of every single one of the anime series
Electrumite should now really come back. It's just not that op anymore. In the current format pendulum sees almost no play in the current meta and I think bringing back electrumite wouldn’t change that much.