Why all major powers are trying to get Aircraft carriers now ?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 357

  • @sharmavarun
    @sharmavarun 3 ปีที่แล้ว +98

    Cricket team vala example bahot sahi diya. Apne desh ke "buddhujeevi" patrakaro ki vastavikta bhi bahot sahi se batai. Bahot achha video banaya hai bhai.

  • @saqlainalam8090
    @saqlainalam8090 3 ปีที่แล้ว +68

    That's why Alpha defence is owesome. His explanation skills is amazing. You should be in Indian defence policy makers team.

    • @pradeepmdwp1842
      @pradeepmdwp1842 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@KS-op9bb Tume kya lagta hai?🧐🤔

    • @bibinthomas5282
      @bibinthomas5282 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KS-op9bb shayadd...apna pockets fill karna hee unka kaam 😌😌

    • @saqlainalam8090
      @saqlainalam8090 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KS-op9bb bewakuf nhi but their problem solving approach is traditional. They did not evolve with the pace of world.

    • @siddeshnaik2296
      @siddeshnaik2296 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think thry consider these things and many things which are secret the problem is that the processes are very slow and lots of red tape making the process efficient also if we depend on govt companies then we are doomed we should involve more private focus on future tech and get govt companies in line we shud focus not only on self sufficient but also as a top 5 defense exporter in next 10 years

    • @diecastworld7962
      @diecastworld7962 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KS-op9bb ha dabakuwf log hi ministry of Defence may hay barna aj 42 ke jaga 25 squadron nahi hota air force may

  • @nilnull5457
    @nilnull5457 3 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    Also, aircraft carriers are important for power projection. Subs are only for attack roles, while aircraft carriers, being powerful and visually non-stealthy, allow for different missions, including HADR Ops.

  • @rohitkothari3890
    @rohitkothari3890 3 ปีที่แล้ว +70

    Carrier based drones will be the future of sea dominance.

  • @okman9684
    @okman9684 3 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    We need a third aircraft carrier not because it looks cool but we have to dominate in indian ocean as well as south china sea

    • @b12abhaypatel7
      @b12abhaypatel7 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      India is developing not developed...

    • @shaankhaan1686
      @shaankhaan1686 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@b12abhaypatel7 but was powerful still powerful and will be powerful 🇮🇳❤️ 2 roti kam khaenge par jo aankh dikhae uski ma chod k aayenge 😘

    • @highondankium3626
      @highondankium3626 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      We can't dominate south china sea.... Kuch bhi chutiya giri mat likho

    • @shaankhaan1686
      @shaankhaan1686 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@highondankium3626 here we is China 🤣🤣🤣 i know bro u got butt hurt kicks from INDIAN Army 🇮🇳

    • @thinkbank8709
      @thinkbank8709 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@highondankium3626 India need to build at least some capability to launch offensive mission in South China sea. China is growing it's navy not only to protect its own backyard but also to project power in Indian Ocean and Pacific. When your enemy can defend and attack and you only can defend, you have already lost.

  • @kaustabhsingharoy5403
    @kaustabhsingharoy5403 3 ปีที่แล้ว +69

    Because they understand reality, they are not driven by fake experts, who are also under conflict of interest.

    • @abhishekdev258
      @abhishekdev258 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @KJM you mean Ajay Shukla??

    • @SudhirChauhan
      @SudhirChauhan 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      They R under cover agents. Creating seeds of doubt

    • @vidt999
      @vidt999 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @KJM then you are ajay shukla🤣

    • @vidt999
      @vidt999 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @KJM all are biased, ajay shukla and ravish towards the left, abhijit to the right
      What is the big deal.

    • @vidt999
      @vidt999 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @KJM i dont know about aeronautics, but indian airforce has a very bad track record on getting the requirements for the unit right and are a confused lot.

  • @hira_thakur276
    @hira_thakur276 3 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    इतनी अच्छी explanation..... Wow🙂🙂❤️👍👍

    • @mlkkk629
      @mlkkk629 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Really?

  • @skg901
    @skg901 3 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    To counter the red rascals...

  • @abirbo
    @abirbo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    I hope Japan names their LHD's as Akagi, Kaga, Hiryu and Soryu. They already have Kaga. It will be a tribute to the ones lost in Midway.

    • @harshitsoni3383
      @harshitsoni3383 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Midway??

    • @abirbo
      @abirbo 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@harshitsoni3383 Yes

  • @harshkanojiya4513
    @harshkanojiya4513 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Afganistan ke 3 lakh soldier ne surrender kar jiya aur longevala ki ladai me humare sirf 120 soldier pakistan ke soldier ko hara diya isliye india army is the best army in the world 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳 proud of you indian army jai hind!

    • @harshkanojiya4513
      @harshkanojiya4513 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @kratos true

    • @yuvrajmishra522
      @yuvrajmishra522 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hamara world record neekal gaya haat se 92k surrender ka 🤣

  • @yogastakam6613
    @yogastakam6613 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Awesome explanation Bro❤️❤️❤️

  • @Vikashsingh-pu7ln
    @Vikashsingh-pu7ln 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    the aircraft carrier takes long time to build, if we approve it today then navy get his 3rd aircraft carrier almost 10 year later. 3rd aircraft carrier is a future needs of Indian navy, it'll be very helpful of India if it build with nuclear powered.
    The leader of India must think about it.

    • @shirinmimashangva1040
      @shirinmimashangva1040 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      now that Kochin Shipyard Limited has many experience in ship building and now in aircraft carrier aswell, they said they can make it under 7 years if an order is given.

    • @Vikashsingh-pu7ln
      @Vikashsingh-pu7ln 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@shirinmimashangva1040 I agree, but Kochi shipyard ltd said they can build iac-1 sister's ship in 7 years,
      The nuclear powered aircraft carrier is future needs, many upcoming project will be based on this type of carrier, we can say that navy wants flat top carrier not Skye jumped carrier.

  • @-ShantanuShinde
    @-ShantanuShinde 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    We need to develop engines for aircrafts, drones, surface to air systems like S-400 on immediate basis to support the development of area denial platforms.

  • @rajs2659
    @rajs2659 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Due to f-35b. They can have fifth gen fighter on 25k ton helicopter carrier also.

    • @someon713
      @someon713 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Japan can only carry 10 F-35B on their helicopter carrier. Only 20 F-35 with 2 helicopter carriers.
      We can use CATS warrior as the fixed wing fighters in place of F-35B.
      Better have another carrier AND 2-4 helicopter carriers.

  • @onkarbhagawati1275
    @onkarbhagawati1275 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Very good analysis... I love your videos bro..... Keep it up... Jay hind

  • @hritabanroy9900
    @hritabanroy9900 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This video needs to go viral over internet...... Probably it will shut up those experts who are actually slowing the process of acquiring third aircraft carrier.

  • @arunkumarts8279
    @arunkumarts8279 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Pretty fair analysis.
    Keep up the good work bro😍💖💖🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

    • @AlphaDefenseHindi
      @AlphaDefenseHindi  3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Thank you so much 😀

    • @arunkumarts8279
      @arunkumarts8279 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AlphaDefenseHindi I should thank you for this wonderful analysis.😊
      Btw Welcome 😊

  • @preethasudheesh9771
    @preethasudheesh9771 3 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    Hey bro any update on Over The Horizon radar ❤
    I would love to hear the news about it 😀
    I have read your article on Over The Horizon radar
    It was very good
    And in that under timeline section
    It is mentioned that the implementation timeline is 6 weeks
    😀
    The update was given in somewhat around the mid of 15 and 20June
    It has been over 6 weeks now 😔 new update till now
    Why so?

    • @AlphaDefenseHindi
      @AlphaDefenseHindi  3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Proto implementation is complete and its in testing

    • @preethasudheesh9771
      @preethasudheesh9771 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@AlphaDefenseHindi ok alpha

    • @preethasudheesh9771
      @preethasudheesh9771 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@AlphaDefenseHindi btw can you share some information regarding the completion of prototype of Over The Horizon radar
      I mean it article or pictures

  • @tejasindianairforce3215
    @tejasindianairforce3215 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Nice explain 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻💙

  • @RaghuReddy88
    @RaghuReddy88 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Could please make a English verson with more template and graphical work. There is huge potential for such videos and we could have our own Caspianreport/infographic channels

  • @yashvardhanojha6796
    @yashvardhanojha6796 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It's more about Showing that you have strength than actually punching the opposite guy that's why when it comes to power protection , submarines are of not much use.
    Great analysis alpha.

  • @nikhilparmar5762
    @nikhilparmar5762 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Amazing knowledge

  • @i_can_doit
    @i_can_doit 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Really u explain very well✌✌✌👍👍

  • @kanav1801
    @kanav1801 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Do we secretly have a third Nuclear submarine from Arihant class ?

    • @strategicindian
      @strategicindian 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We are building more numbers and even bigger ones

    • @AlphaDefenseHindi
      @AlphaDefenseHindi  3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Yup ! Arihant Arighat S4 (Launched) and S4* (In refits)

    • @arunkumarts8279
      @arunkumarts8279 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@guy4814 is that S4?

    • @arunkumarts8279
      @arunkumarts8279 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@guy4814 I thought S3 as Arighat and S4 as Aridhaman.

  • @sanjayarauta2598
    @sanjayarauta2598 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sir apke analysis one of best hai
    With defence decode
    This two TH-cam channels are my favourite

  • @garud321
    @garud321 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Ok... This video had some geostrategic information but we are expecting more from you 🤗🤗

  • @lucifergaming0702
    @lucifergaming0702 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Jai hind ❤️❤️

    • @lucifergaming0702
      @lucifergaming0702 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Want video on types of aircraft carrier ❤️

  • @harshitsoni3383
    @harshitsoni3383 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Bro
    you sarcasms are so smooth 🤣

  • @kartikeswarbisoi5639
    @kartikeswarbisoi5639 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nicely done..well script info

  • @shubhamkumar1478
    @shubhamkumar1478 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow. Good analysis. Hope Government of India goes for Third aircraft carrier. If budget constraint just go for sister ship of ins Vikrant.

  • @cassiedcosta
    @cassiedcosta 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Dude I love your sarcasm 😁😁

  • @rajs2659
    @rajs2659 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Correct. Without proper fighter jets people may joke at us.

  • @EsportsSchool
    @EsportsSchool 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    8:51 😍😍😍😍😍 आहा..... बॉम्बर लवर्स का पहला प्यार... लैंसर 😍😍😍
    ट्रांसफार्मर्स फ़िल्म का सीन याद आ गया
    "B1 snap 090 तुम्हें अपने 2000 lbs वाले JDAMM फेंकने की इजाज़त है!!!"
    💥💥💥💥💥 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

  • @anujitganguly2029
    @anujitganguly2029 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Very well thought out video and that raises some points too , such what is going to be the new naval air wing consists of ? F/A 18, Mig 29Ks or N -LCA ?

    • @AlphaDefenseHindi
      @AlphaDefenseHindi  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Mostly 29K

    • @anujitganguly2029
      @anujitganguly2029 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@AlphaDefenseHindi but then it will increase the import and also not help the indigenous development.

  • @deepakmajhi5205
    @deepakmajhi5205 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    5:31 😂😂😂
    Here we gooooooo... Ultimate roast😂

  • @abhinavsharma5274
    @abhinavsharma5274 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I totally agree with you that Submarine and Aircraft carrier have different role and no one can replace other one. If India want to be blue water navy then we need at least 3-4 aircraft carriers and 4-6 LHDs plus 12-18 nuclear submarines.
    Although Pakistan navy is not a threat today but they are trying to build with help of China, considering 10 years of Pakistani navy from now, we must plan and work before they poses threat to us.

  • @WiggleDraggy
    @WiggleDraggy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Even if the navy cannot afford a 65k ton aircraft they should atleast go for another 45k ton carrier like vikrant Cochin shipyard already said they can make a similar carrier like Vikrant in 7 years and that would be a good option to have 3 carriers operation at all times plus after that if our economy by the time the 3rd carrier is operation is improved we can than order a construction of a 65k nuclear-powered carrier to replace our INS vikramaditya

    • @riktimchowdhury5337
      @riktimchowdhury5337 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      But the 3rd AC should be a Catobar launched one.. otherwise it can't operate large fixed wing AWACS.

    • @WiggleDraggy
      @WiggleDraggy 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@riktimchowdhury5337 Idk if operating a large fixed wing from a 45k ton carrier would make sense as it would take a looot of space but yea for emergency uses a catobar launcher would be better

    • @riktimchowdhury5337
      @riktimchowdhury5337 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@WiggleDraggy France aircraft carrier with a displacement of 42000 tonne carries fixed wing AWACS. It is very necessary.

    • @WiggleDraggy
      @WiggleDraggy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@riktimchowdhury5337 Aah didn't knew that but France aircraft carrier is nuclear-powered so the size of their catapult is smaller than one which would be operated by a non nuclear one so idk if a 45k ton will be able to carry a lot of fighters if we get awacs.

  • @r.p1617
    @r.p1617 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Best analysis 👍

  • @marathi_manus467
    @marathi_manus467 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    india should make islands in hindi occenas....it would be big but permanant investment and we can operate a huge militery group from island💯💯

  • @NIKHILMITTAL321
    @NIKHILMITTAL321 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Aircraft carrier and submarine both are important one is eye 👀 and other is ear 👂

  • @Sacrafago90
    @Sacrafago90 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    We need 4 carrier fleet by 2040-42 timelines,we don't need super carriers for that but two 50000-52000 tonnes which are CATOBAR capable with steam Catapults,even with conventional propulsion.
    These carriers can carry 36 fighters,2 Fixed wing AEW,4 ASW Helicopters,4 NUH & even drones.
    A 4 fleet carrier will be able to control eastern & western front,one in far off IOR & one under refit at times,to keep 3 always operational.
    Then only India can protect it's trade in high seas.
    For that we need fighters,so kindly handover the entire production of fighters to private sectors to maintain timelines.

  • @sujitprodhan1079
    @sujitprodhan1079 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great home work sir, I salute u

  • @anmolbali4640
    @anmolbali4640 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    India 🇮🇳 should too start its focusing on our own LHD's in good number... Our third Aircraft carrier should be CATOBAR-Nuclear Powered Ship and 3 Aircraft carrier can be complimented with at least 5-7 LHD's Nuclear Powered and our UAV's and Naval CATs system can operate from these LHD's and boost our Power.

    • @siddharth4277
      @siddharth4277 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The original plan was to have 3 AC and 4LHD so one LHD with each AC while one goes for maintenance.. but now the navy is most likely to go for 2LHD now and a third AC and might go for another 2 LHD as follow on after the delivery of first 2...

  • @EsportsSchool
    @EsportsSchool 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    4:50 ये नाम कैसे pronounce करना है... इसको लेकर की गई मेहनत ये तो भगवान और आप ही जानते हैं। 😲😲🤣🤣🤣
    5:02 किटी 🤣🤣🤣 इतनी खतरनाक चीज़ का इतना क्यूट नाम। 😅😅🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

  • @chandrakantsingh9174
    @chandrakantsingh9174 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bro, I analysis everything, everything is quiet clear to my mind regarding future threats but a huge barrier is "make in India ". After so much hush push, they managed a carrier recently. Still testing. But for vast nation with super vast need, u have to think priority wise. Now we have support of Quad. They have most carriers. India has just one nuclear-powered sub, sub without nuc-powered is just a target in this hi-tech warfare era. So, Navy is huge investment zone but there's support, till then take Air Force to challenging height. UAV r about to come. After the deal, nuclear-powered subs & carriers with advance missile launcher & best jets. Say 3-4 yrs from now. This was my analysis about Southern Asian country named India.

  • @vijay9t9
    @vijay9t9 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good analysis, ab tak ka 👍😁

  • @Puran.
    @Puran. 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Kuznetsov Lionang aur Shandong aircraft carrier me jab aircraft take off kerta he Tab piche ek diwar type boost ke liye kya hota he ? Aur vikrant me kyu nahi he aesa...?

    • @tyrantfox7801
      @tyrantfox7801 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's for deflecting jet exhaust , not for boosting thrust.
      American and French carriers have those too

    • @Puran.
      @Puran. 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tyrantfox7801 wo hi to Ise kya kehte he?

  • @therudrangshub
    @therudrangshub 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    5:32 I love this part ❤️

  • @CyrusInIndia
    @CyrusInIndia 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Actually USA has 20 carriers. 11 are supercarriers and rest are flattop amphibious helicopter type carriers or assault ships which are between 40 to 50 thousand tons displacement.

  • @sauravghosh7064
    @sauravghosh7064 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    While subs ek attack unit hai
    Like special forces jo chupke se jata hai
    Aur counterterrorism mission karte hai aur wapas ajate hai
    But jis tarah area capture sirf conventional army se kiya ja sakta hai waise hi koi sea/ocean body bhi sirf conventional Aircraft carrier,destroyer ya fridget se control kiya ja sakta hai ,
    Submarine ye nahi kar sakte

  • @alokchaudhary7275
    @alokchaudhary7275 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The way you explain is outstanding..

  • @laughingbrick4824
    @laughingbrick4824 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    We wasted $3 Billion on Afghanistan ...
    Can't we invest $3 Billion or more on a aircraft carrier with Catapult system ?
    I am utterly dissapointed ..

    • @hemanshu0503
      @hemanshu0503 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Claps for the unverified statements from this Pakistani Handle

    • @karanrathod2481
      @karanrathod2481 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hemanshu0503 wasted lol 😂

  • @rakeshthakur01
    @rakeshthakur01 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Your content are always good

  • @anuragnath4156
    @anuragnath4156 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    5:07 - USA ke kity ke samne Thailand ka super kity 😂

  • @bhushanthombare2553
    @bhushanthombare2553 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Best example tha bhai cricket waala👍
    Submarine= area deterrence
    Aircraft carrier= area dominance.

  • @mjs1398
    @mjs1398 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bharat ko 50,000 Ton ke Nuclear powerd Catobar Aircraft Carrier ke liye planning karna chahiye. isse Bharat ko future mein 3 Aircraft Carrier ho jaye ga.
    Vikramaditya ko Arabian Sea par, Vikrant ko Bay of Bengal par aur 3rd Nuclear powerd Catobar Aircraft Carrier ko Indian Ocean par deploy kiya jaa sakta hai.

  • @warrior_1101
    @warrior_1101 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Alpha Defence and Defence Decode work for Goverment as Engineers and AIM is just a theory guy.
    If China and Europe can push for more Aircraft Carriers despite demographic collapse,then why not India?

  • @khiorambagang6139
    @khiorambagang6139 ปีที่แล้ว

    We are proud of our indian naval force .But I pitch for a massive carrier to dominate the entire I
    Bay of Bengal region and flexing muscles upto south china sea. My view is that in place of INS Vishal it may be named as INS Brahmaputra to uphold the sentiments of Northeast India and to effectuate Act East policy of India ...Jai Hind

  • @malcolmdsouza4463
    @malcolmdsouza4463 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    One thing I believe is whether we go for STOBAR or CATOBAR depending on our budget, we need to have nuclear power to give it range and carry more aviation fuel. Vikramaditya is old and soo will require replacement so we need 2 more in the near future.
    If STOBAR they should be easy to modify to flat top such should be the design.
    DRDO if can make a railgun then they can make EMALS need to invest in research.

  • @RahulGoswamiGahdulal
    @RahulGoswamiGahdulal 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    भाई आप बहुत बारीकी से समझाते हो बहुत बढ़िया 🙏🙏🙏😍❤️

  • @JayantRaut
    @JayantRaut 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    5:48 haan muze kuchh ni aata hai, agree karne ki bat to dur maine analysis dekha hi nahi pada hi nahi! isliye to aapke video dekhta hu! 😐😐😐😎

  • @shivamkumarsingh7299
    @shivamkumarsingh7299 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Hey bro, do you have any update on what would happen to indian lhd programme,the future of indian lhd
    What if Cochin shipyard build lhd as they have gain expertise from ins Vikrant

    • @AlphaDefenseHindi
      @AlphaDefenseHindi  3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Yup ! makes sense
      But its stuck

    • @arunkumarts8279
      @arunkumarts8279 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AlphaDefenseHindi But again the problem is with STOVL aircraft right?
      We won't get F35B
      Even helicopters are also not there I guess.

    • @Sacrafago90
      @Sacrafago90 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@arunkumarts8279 The solution is Russian Priboy E ,23900 class design with 40000 tonnes displacement,which also has options to install short range Catapults.
      Even if it is with Steam Catapults which can launch fighters & UAV,it worth it.
      Such ship would cost 1.25-1.5 billion dollars with Catapults for export customers with local manufacturing.
      A 40000 tons displacement ship with Catapults can easily launch 18-24 normal Marine fighters,so 2 such ships would have a fleet of 36-48 fighters along with 4-6 AEW & 12-16 Helicopters in total,thus considerably increasingly our Naval power.

  • @rashtrawad
    @rashtrawad 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    मैं समझता हूँ कि aircraft कैरियर पर 70%aircrafts, 30% हेलिकॉप्टर होने चाहिए। व nearby naval bases पे ड्रोन deploy होने चाहिए। भारत के पास 4 aircraft कैरियर जरूर होने चाहिए।

  • @pradeepkandari85
    @pradeepkandari85 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir you are great in defence knowledge.

  • @harshkanojiya4513
    @harshkanojiya4513 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for update bhaiya

  • @rohitnishantsingh2116
    @rohitnishantsingh2116 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bhai, I agree with your points ki aircraft carriers are necessary for every country, but the list highlighted in this video thoda confusing hai kyuki you have mentioned several countries with light aircraft carriers or helicopters carrier, now bringing this other category "helicopter carrier" into this list khud mein ek bee-hive hai kyuki, then you have to include several other countries too like Egypt's Gamal Abdel Nasser and Anwar El Sadat, the two LHD Mistral class, aur phir khud French navy mein operational same class ke ships b, another country you should mention is South Korea (now again I have mentioned this because you have mentioned Japan), they have 2 Dokdo-class amphibious assault ship and at last you can mention Brazil too with it's Atlântico, aur phir apna pyar China b Type 075 landing helicopter dock ready kr rha hai, so I think iss video ko thoda aur simplify krke yeh sare category mention karna chaiye with advantage and disadvantages of each category.

    • @AlphaDefenseHindi
      @AlphaDefenseHindi  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      F35 operating out of Juan carlos is aircraft carrier

  • @sahilthakur9420
    @sahilthakur9420 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    India should start focus on navy

  • @PrashantRajput-zm9oy
    @PrashantRajput-zm9oy ปีที่แล้ว

    Really don't know why TH-cam suggested me this video now...
    Btw will be happy to see if we get a revised video again on this when india has finally got it's second AC

  • @tejpaldeki
    @tejpaldeki 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are right sir

  • @babuvishwass5910
    @babuvishwass5910 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    3 Aircraft Carriers are very essential for Indian Navy.

  • @MOHDSHAHID-fy9ig
    @MOHDSHAHID-fy9ig 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    India helicopter carrier pe work chal raha hai. Please es pe bhi video banaye ya banane ka plane hai 4 heli carrier

  • @laughingbrick4824
    @laughingbrick4824 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Meanwhile Indian govt. still thinking whether to have a 3rd aircraft carrier.
    No policy on Pakistan , No policy for Kashmir and Gilgit and ofcourse no policy for China. For 75 years we are just walking a unknown road without a map.

    • @user-jp9bg5zz5c
      @user-jp9bg5zz5c 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Really, Mr.Ajit Doval & EAM S. Jaishankar needs to take tutorial class on policy making from you

    • @naveenparashar764
      @naveenparashar764 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      We are on track now.Indian Navy have to convince CDS & their demand approved.
      Next CDS may be from NAVY or Airforce.
      So we are moving toward consolidation of Power & distribution of responsibility

  • @sandesh238
    @sandesh238 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice indepth analysis

  • @chinmayveer8306
    @chinmayveer8306 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    We should invest more money in navy , so that we make sure that we control Indian Ocean

  • @riktimchowdhury5337
    @riktimchowdhury5337 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    GOI should immediately approve a 45000 tonne AC with Catobar launched system. Nuclear or conventional doesn't matter. But it has to be delivered to Navy within 10 years. We can take help from France. When our economy grows we can develop a Nuclear powered super carriear as a replacement of INS Vikramaditya.. kya bolte ho dosto.

  • @kunalsinha2355
    @kunalsinha2355 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Jai hind 🇮🇳🇮🇳

  • @RP-qs1tp
    @RP-qs1tp 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I disagree with your analysis, in 21st century Aircraft carrier is useless for a country like India because we believe in defense. The other nations namely US and China are both aggressive that’s not our way of doing things. Another large power Russia has also declared AC useless which can be destroyed with barrage of modern supersonic and (hypersonic in future) missiles easily. Just bcuz some countries are thinking of converting LHD is due to availability of F35 to them. They are not specifically looking to build large carriers but making a smart move of dual use of available platforms. Both are different things.
    Same amount of 5+bn can be divided to buy nuclear submarines , drones and developing our island with air strips ( unsinkable carrier ). When we have a limited budget which is clear across armed forces the procurement needs to be in smart areas and bring harmonization amongst various arms of forces. I don’t feel we achieve that with carrier. From an engineering point of view it’s something to be proud of but from use it’s not worth the bill! For ex: you can get 36 more loaded Rafales plus a couple of submarines at same price!

  • @ChandanSingh-qn4fy
    @ChandanSingh-qn4fy 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    naval power is true power.

  • @anubhavraj7717
    @anubhavraj7717 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Because this is a moving army base.

  • @mohanrajawat6508
    @mohanrajawat6508 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    India should carefully plan, how they use their carriers approach in their backyard IOR where almost all the world major power have interest and they atleast a nuclear power carrier to protect them
    So INS vishal is requirements with large aircraft capacity and long endurance

  • @abhishekdev258
    @abhishekdev258 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Vikrant's airwing will be 12 Mig 29s plus 8 Naval LCA...True??

  • @Rahul_only
    @Rahul_only 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hmm....bhai ko pta lag gya 3rd aircraft carrier aane wala hai 🙏🏻

  • @sauravrawat592
    @sauravrawat592 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Jai hind🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

  • @ashokirkal5850
    @ashokirkal5850 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir Chinese aircraft carriers ke bare mein ek video banaye

  • @MusicGuru-
    @MusicGuru- 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Aircraft carrier ke andar drones rakhna bhi bahut jaada zaruri hai.

  • @abhinayrangari9693
    @abhinayrangari9693 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hme vikrant class ke carrier ko Australian navy ko offer karna chahiye.
    Log hmare pass nhi ayenge weapon khridne hme unke pass jana hoga jaise russia hme offer deta hai vaise hi.

  • @sumitchand3447
    @sumitchand3447 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    True i mean lallantop and wire ke defence journalists piche pade the as a propaganda to degrade indigenous manufacturing skills... vikrant ki lifts ko lekar... laughing seriously....now navy have shut them up gud by saying it can even accomodate rafale m....

  • @lifestyle3409
    @lifestyle3409 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    To have total sea domination we need 10 more aircraft carriers in the long run.Around 12-13...If we serious intention to become a superpower

  • @saiecorp5646
    @saiecorp5646 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very good information and good analysis. However it is very difficult to call LHDs as aircraft carriers, though F35s have given them capabality of acting as AC. LHD convert AC will have lot many limitations so let us discard Japan, Australia and Turkey as AC nations. But still US, China, UK, France, Italy, Spain, Russia and India have aircraft carriers. Thanx for information. Jai Hind.

    • @AlphaDefenseHindi
      @AlphaDefenseHindi  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Izumo can actually carry 28 F35B

    • @saiecorp5646
      @saiecorp5646 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@AlphaDefenseHindi Yes, no doubt. But operating aircrafts from LHD has limitations like aircraft management and operations. Main function of LHD is to move troops to ground. F35B can help in ground support role but still cannot operate on high seas like conventional AC. Thanx.

    • @adithyabs3410
      @adithyabs3410 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AlphaDefenseHindi lol that's more than vikru

  • @nisarg6022
    @nisarg6022 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Jai Hind

  • @kolpekpratik2566
    @kolpekpratik2566 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video

  • @tagedge
    @tagedge 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    एयरक्राफ्ट कैरियर के स्थान पर sea आइलैंड पर फोकस करना चाहिए।
    जैसे चीन ने बहुत सारे कृतिम आइलैंड बना दिए है

  • @DrRajReddy
    @DrRajReddy 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    u forgot to mention 9 amphibious ships of US Navy. (2 America Class and 7 Wasp Class ). They displace about 45,000 ton for America class and 40.5K ton for Wasp class.

  • @mihirnandan4882
    @mihirnandan4882 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    That's sarcasm 👌👌👌🔥🔥🔥

  • @sunstar1son
    @sunstar1son 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you please show design difference between best aircraft carriers and of india

  • @dhaall
    @dhaall 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I feel in future there will be things like floating beds or floating artificial island far larger and perhaps simpler with massive fire power at seas

  • @theholidayentertainmentthe6055
    @theholidayentertainmentthe6055 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can we modify cargo ship to aircraft carrier... What is your view point on this idea...asking this out of curiosity

  • @glennlopez6772
    @glennlopez6772 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Suppose that the jobs will always be outdoors.
    Housing of staff will require less real estate.

  • @gaurav4211
    @gaurav4211 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir I know u don't agree with our view of not having a aircraft carrier. So let me tell u the problems
    - we don't have fund relatively
    - India don't have big opponent in Indian ocean.
    - we have 2 aircraft carriers already
    -We have islands in choke points from strait of malacca to Lakshadweep.
    - We don't have jets to have aircraft carrier, ya we have TEDBF bt they will also be replacing mig 29k after 8-10 yrs

    • @AlphaDefenseHindi
      @AlphaDefenseHindi  3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      - How amortization work ? even if you are buying Gerald ford its just 1.1 billion $/ year. (We have that money).
      - For now ( You will see one Chineese carrier in Gwadar and another one entering IOR often).
      - We have 2 and none is flat top (I have discussed that multiple times why we need flat top.
      - Island can ever be an aircraft carrier talk to any Marcos and they will tell you why cant :)
      - Vishal will anyways take 10 years from here so you will have time to make your fighters :)

    • @gaurav4211
      @gaurav4211 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@AlphaDefenseHindi
      I don't want to mess with the Alpha👑🇮🇳🇮🇳

  • @xijinping4960
    @xijinping4960 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    5:35 is he talking about defense matrix ? 😂