1. yes 270+ fps 2. i would say the ips was smoother in motion but had some ghosting. oled is clearer due to less ghosting but not as smooth. if that makes sense.
@DrKhian I only asked because the description said the IPS was clearer. Might want to update that cause its confusing. Was it significantly clearer or just slightly btw?
ips smoother in fast motion, due to higher fps, in fast pace competitive fps it is better. Clearer and smoother id say are different things. It’s hard to explain, anyways. Both are close. 😊
@@shiiraga1111 Oled >/= Nano IPS+MiniLED > Nanocell+MiniLED > VA+MiniLED >/= IPS+MiniLED > Nanocell > IPS >/= VA > TN. Well, I speak based on my experience, having used both screen types: LCD (TN and IPS) and OLED (AMOLED and SUPER AMOLED). In fact, whether in dark or bright environments, I would always choose OLED. Most of OLED's issues, such as burn-in and lack of brightness, have practically been resolved. Perhaps the only remaining downside is the price. Some LCD screens can deliver very similar quality nowadays, but only when equipped with technologies like Nano IPS + MiniLED, which make them almost as expensive. Anyway, only choose LCD if your budget doesn't allow for OLED. If that's the case, prioritize panels with MiniLED.
1. Was your framerate at 270+?
2. Which display was clearer in motion, and by how much?
1. yes 270+ fps
2. i would say the ips was smoother in motion but had some ghosting. oled is clearer due to less ghosting but not as smooth. if that makes sense.
@DrKhian the ghosting is from the slower response times, the smoothness is from the extra frames.
Other than ghosting did it look clearer?
@@Hybred oled is cleaner and clearer. Even at 120hz vs 270hz.
@DrKhian I only asked because the description said the IPS was clearer. Might want to update that cause its confusing.
Was it significantly clearer or just slightly btw?
ips smoother in fast motion, due to higher fps, in fast pace competitive fps it is better. Clearer and smoother id say are different things. It’s hard to explain, anyways. Both are close. 😊
very interesting, thank you!
feel like 0.1 ms response time is kinda bad in a way, like the frames not having any blur makes frames too jumpy
Was BFI turned on on the OLED?
No
good video!
Thanks!
I don't know how tf I got this recommended after 2 years but anyways could u pls make more of these comparision videos.
sorry don't have the ips anymore. still using the bx after all this while. can't go wrong with OLED
@@DrKhianDid you get any burn in?
great stuff tbh
The ips looks like it has very poor color accuracy
It's just pushing more red, white balance might be off, or the white balance might be off with the LG, we can't know which is closer to reference.
@@verttisyrjala2897 Maybe it has Night Time on, since IPS can be hard to the eyes at night xD
@@YgorRessel-Dinteresting, but oled is better in dark places?
@@shiiraga1111 Oled >/= Nano IPS+MiniLED > Nanocell+MiniLED > VA+MiniLED >/= IPS+MiniLED > Nanocell > IPS >/= VA > TN.
Well, I speak based on my experience, having used both screen types: LCD (TN and IPS) and OLED (AMOLED and SUPER AMOLED). In fact, whether in dark or bright environments, I would always choose OLED. Most of OLED's issues, such as burn-in and lack of brightness, have practically been resolved. Perhaps the only remaining downside is the price. Some LCD screens can deliver very similar quality nowadays, but only when equipped with technologies like Nano IPS + MiniLED, which make them almost as expensive.
Anyway, only choose LCD if your budget doesn't allow for OLED. If that's the case, prioritize panels with MiniLED.
@@shiiraga1111 Yes it is since it can eliminate the backlight glow problem that ips has
TN быстрей в динамичных играх чем OLED
nonsense
no