The public must not be put in the position of having to second-guess the accuracy of news they receive? Where has that person been for the last two decades?
For real. People take quotes out of context all the time, especially things politicians said, and things that the news media said. This doesn't sound that different from people just making up lies that may or may not be loosely based on the truth.
I believe you should always keep at least a sliver of skepticism in your mind when reading any new information. Does it seem reasonable? well sometimes the truth is not reasonable sounding. Does the source have an agenda? What are their biases? How are they paid? By whom? Are other outlets reporting the same facts? Has this source been accurate in the past? It's called critical thinking and it should be everybody's default.
Two decades? Try at least six decades if not forever. Walter Cronkite used to lie back in the 60's. Huntley and Brinkley told us what the government wanted us to hear. This is nothing new.
@newshodgepodge6329 What resources does the average person have to fact-check the media? If the Times publishes a lie and everyone else just copies/pastes it, where does one find the truth? You gonna trust Netanyahu? The US government? The UN? One can quite literally not trust anyone or anything anymore, and I'm beginning to think that is the plan now that they're openly referring to us as human capital.
I for one have been pleasantly surprised with the news out of last Vegas about Livels 🍔/cyber truck stuff. Seems they're being fairly open about stuff. (Press conference by police that is)
Today I asked Siri a question, and twice in a row it kept saying I needed to be online for that. I asked the third time exactly the same way, and it gave me my answer. Then I said, "Siri, your Ai is spying on me, STOP IT." Siri answered, "NO!" So I repeated the same phrase twice more the same way, and Siri answered, "NOPE!" twice in a row. I then told Siri that I was going to record that response. Then repeated the phrase, then it began saying it didn't know what I meant.
I do my very best to keep truth alive in my world. I believe that's all we can do. I cannot express how much I despise being premedittatively lied to and yes I despise pathological liars. The liars of the world will have to deal with the consequences.
Oh don’t think I was not laughing as this came across as don’t let AI mislead you…..that is our job. 😆 I also was laughing at the fact that we are having some guy read us the news. (No offense Steve, me and my wife love your commentary) It’s going to be fun.
I'm in IT as a profession, and I don't think it's hyperbole to be concerned that AI is going to be the end of rational human thought and discussion. Our blind reliance in it borders on religious fanaticism. This time, the kool-aid is digits.
Yes, it seems very weird. I mean, these models are just something well designed to generate text similar to that which a human would create (or whatever it's trained on). There doesn't seem to be anything much more, but the hype levels...
@@timbergel8147 LLMs are pretty neat tech. But there is NO intelligence to it, as you said. It is simply a eerily accurate word predictor. So yes, it can make text that looks like a human wrote it, but there is no intelligence behind it.
People don't rely on AI that much, they rely way more on fake news they heard on social media, or propaganda outlets posing as news which are often some ultra partisan political mouthpiece. Fox news was once criticized years ago for defending how they have clearly biased rightwing talk shows by arguing that "It's an entertainment show, not news".
Misreporting is noting new and can't be entirely blamed on AI. The first example that popped into my head was a story about the death of Lester Flatt, (a country musician and one of the writers of the Beverly Hillbillies theme.). I saw him in a TV interview about a year later and he said they are about to find out just how dead I am.
Apple should know better. Just wait until people take AI advice to purchase crypto. I use to love the maps AI generated to outline future global warming trends... Thanks for the video Steve, I'm afraid people will never get it.
@@Subject_Keter depends on what the prompt to summarize is... "Summarize this, and blame the Democrats"; "Summarize that, and make the Republicans look bad", and other options...
I've been using Apple products for over 30 years. Lately, the changes irritate me and I disable many of the 'features,' including never having turned Siri on. It listens as it is, but I don't want my computer actively answering me! Thank you, Steve from Michigan.
When software is in beta testing, it is only given to a small amount of volunteer users known as beta testers. Someone who is close to Apple ought to pass this information along.
This saddens me greatly. While nowadays I am not professionally involved with AI, I have been involved with multiple such projects in the past (and am using this new generation of generative AI tools on my spare time), and general purpose transformers are being used in ways they should never have been used, and it is not getting better. People do not realize that older implementations, while harder to train and less accessible, at least had no chance of hallucinations. If one wants accuracy, veracity, GPT (or heck, any Alexnet derivative) is simply not capable of performing the task (and from recent published articles, it might never be at that point). This is just a very modern and technologically advanced example of people trying to hammer a nail with a screwdriver...
It's not "not enough workers". It's "we don't want to pay adequately, so we'll use AI for content". It's wealth concentration, and unfettered, will do tremendous damage to the public financially and civically.
Apple should start with something simple - get the weather feed on my iPhone to reflect reality... Misting the other day and my iPhone was telling me we got 33” of rain overnight.
I think another issue is that most people will not second guess most stories even if it has the 'summarised by AI' tag. They are just trying to keep investors by forcing out incomplete tech or trying to shoehorn it into places it shouldn't be.
Wow, getting shit wrong and outright fabricating stories out of nowhere? These Artificial """""Intelligence""""" models are getting more human every day!
Recently, there's been a TH-cam video discussing how generative AI took over freelance writers' work. Later Google made a AI video summary on it there by possibly not needing to watch the video and not getting monetization from it... Ai generated content screwed this individual twice-
When I see the AI above search results, I just get annoyed about having to scroll to find the search results. I have read the things a couple of times, and it was enough to point me away from AI whatsoever.
For those who don't know and are curious, Michigan is an anglicization of the gallicization (i.e. it came to English via French first) of an Ojibwe word roughly pronounced "mishigami" which means "large lake".
Not just "not pay someone." The more dramatic and outrageous the headline, the more clicks they get - which means the more advertising money they get. This way, they save money by cutting staff _AND_ increase incoming advertising revenue, all in one swell foop (sic).
FYI, the Mlive article was corrected a few days later. It starts with a bolded statement saying, "Correction: A previous version of this story incorrectly translated the origin word for Michigan."
I have yet to figure out how to send Apple feedback on anything, and Google's feedback goes straight to the proverbial bit bucket. I would be shocked if either organization used any of my suggestions.
Since mackinaw is derived from Ojibwa language's word for turtle, I can see that small segmental connection. Michilimackinac is Ojibwa for "Island of the Great Turtle" but that has nothing to do with the name Michiga, which is derived completely separately.
NRK in norway (our main news network) Have been using ia for its sumorys for a couple of years but its always mentioned in the article what part it was used for (NOT the main part of the article etc but a small box with some information a few lines long with a couple of facts) and they claim (And i would think its true considering europeen rules and regulations) that they have humans fact checking the info from the ai before it is published. the things they used for might be info about a couple of forest fires in an article about forest fiers, number of people drowning while trying to crose from africa to europe in a article about a boat going down during the atempt and simular things.
If we ask for a summary of something, but then are expected to fact-check the summary to make sure it's actually true, then what's the point of these AI-summaries in the first place?!? Also I wonder how many defamation lawsuits we're going to have in the near future from false AI-generated articles claiming things against real life people.
The deepest problem with this is that when the AI then gets asked "where does the name Michigan come from?" It will source the incorrect information that was generated by AI over and over again and keep repeating it until it becomes the truth as far as AI is concerned.
There's a state in Mexico called Michoacan. Named by their ancestors, it means "land of lakes". So, how did a state, 3,000 miles away, get the same name, with the same meaning?!
I did a quick search for "where did Michigan get it's name ?" It said it was an Ojibwe word meaning " big lake " Have a great day, bad Michigan !!!!! ;)
I just asked AI to create a meaningless mishmash of words and format it as an article. This is literally some stuff that people have posted online before; oh boy...
They have given AI generated news content real names for years now. A recent example is the AI accounts Meta had announced. They showed names, profiles, pictures, bios, everything.
I used to say the artificial intelligence had absolutely no creativity because it only spits out what it is picked up. However, I changed my mind for the most part. It is very creative and comes up with all kinds of things. Nobody else would come up with in real life.
I just had a job interview yesterday... it was horrible... everything went swirling down the drain when I couldn't answer how I've been using AI technology and how it has improved my personal life. This was not a technical job in any way. I'm dead serious.
Ben Hundo's poking out from The Other Side of the Night...above the upper left corner of the New York W4NYC license plate, 2nd shelf right, above Steve's shoulder
They need a Maxwell's Demon of the Second Kind, as described in Stanislaw Lem's Cyberiad, The PHT Pirate. Once the Maxwell's Demon generates a random datum, a Maxwell's Demon of the Second Kind is needed to determine if it's true. Once the PhT Pirate got his source of Truth, he needed a Maxwell's Demon of the Third Kind, to measure Relevance.
9:05 I had a pet turtle for a few years. She never came when called. On the other hand I did see a turtle attempt to jump through a hoop of fire on Letterman's Stupid Pet Tricks 🙂
Well... here we go. Not like anyone predicted this. 🙄 Now add that to Meta's decision to drop fact-checking in favor of free speech (AKA Lies are just alternative facts.)
Unfortunately, fact checking doesn’t increase the bottom line. These billionaires think we’re stupid enough to believe their intentions are noble. Once upon a time, they might have been but their big money support of authoritarianism proves there’s so there there.
Michigan was named after a turtle - a Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle - Michaelangelo. They badly mispronounced his name and hence - MICHIGAN. (There. THAT ought to feed the AI bots for a while.)
April (the lady the month is named after) can confirm this as fact since she is an actual reporter 😉. She is off today as she has a splinter to deal with
I'm looking at eytmonline and there seems to be evidence of turtles in the discussion, but at the core, it says 'perhaps from Old Ojibwa (Algonquian) *meshi-gami "big lake."' So, perhaps? What did they teach you?
Today's climate of click bait titles is not helping the situation. I appreciate that the titles on your videos are not sensationalized.
Many of them appear sensationalized, though, especially whenever Hertz makes the news, but that's only because it's a crazy world. 😂😂
"Dear AI: You should not post while drunk."
Mark Twain: "If you don't read the newspaper, you're uninformed. If you read the newspaper, you're misinformed."
There is no intelligence in Artificial Intelligence.
Or in most of humanity heads 😂
there is no intelligence in media's reporting of the news.
@@Subject_Keter was about to say that haha
BBC is already fake news
At least when Ai lies it’s obvious...for the moment
For the record, truth and honesty died BEFORE AI became popular.
Ironic, since media notoriously publishes misleading headlines.
since obummer repealed the smith mundt act
Capitalism ruins everything.
right…can we sue the real people who do this stuff too?
The public must not be put in the position of having to second-guess the accuracy of news they receive? Where has that person been for the last two decades?
For real. People take quotes out of context all the time, especially things politicians said, and things that the news media said. This doesn't sound that different from people just making up lies that may or may not be loosely based on the truth.
I believe you should always keep at least a sliver of skepticism in your mind when reading any new information. Does it seem reasonable? well sometimes the truth is not reasonable sounding. Does the source have an agenda? What are their biases? How are they paid? By whom? Are other outlets reporting the same facts? Has this source been accurate in the past?
It's called critical thinking and it should be everybody's default.
Two decades? Try at least six decades if not forever. Walter Cronkite used to lie back in the 60's. Huntley and Brinkley told us what the government wanted us to hear. This is nothing new.
Did you mean two decades or two millennia?
People should always question the accuracy of news. Never put anything past anyone and you will at worst be pleasantly surprised on occasion.
The mainstream media has not set a high bar for accuracy
@newshodgepodge6329 What resources does the average person have to fact-check the media? If the Times publishes a lie and everyone else just copies/pastes it, where does one find the truth? You gonna trust Netanyahu? The US government? The UN?
One can quite literally not trust anyone or anything anymore, and I'm beginning to think that is the plan now that they're openly referring to us as human capital.
I for one have been pleasantly surprised with the news out of last Vegas about Livels 🍔/cyber truck stuff. Seems they're being fairly open about stuff.
(Press conference by police that is)
@codemiesterbeats I'm not familiar. Sorry... Maybe I'll put looking into that on my to-do list.
Democrats beleive everything they read on their woke platforms
Today I asked Siri a question, and twice in a row it kept saying I needed to be online for that. I asked the third time exactly the same way, and it gave me my answer. Then I said, "Siri, your Ai is spying on me, STOP IT." Siri answered, "NO!" So I repeated the same phrase twice more the same way, and Siri answered, "NOPE!" twice in a row. I then told Siri that I was going to record that response. Then repeated the phrase, then it began saying it didn't know what I meant.
Siri tried to break up my relationship witj my husband. No lie. We have Android now because of thatbut it's not much better.
Wow, I just asked it to and it gave the same answer. I asked why not and it said no. 😂 😮
Remember, we still live in a world of "alternative facts". Truth is dead.
Long live fake news
Would help if the people who opposed it .. would actually do something about it?
"The world is bad... but why would you want ME to fix it?"
I do my very best to keep truth alive in my world. I believe that's all we can do.
I cannot express how much I despise being premedittatively lied to and yes I despise pathological liars.
The liars of the world will have to deal with the consequences.
@Grizazzle 👍
W. Casey : "We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false"
@Grizazzle 👍
🤔For some (odd?) reason W. Casey immediately comes to mind.
But surely that would be remiss of me, wouldn't it?
Why pay people to make up the news when AI can do it for you?
😂😂😂😂 so true
I think that's why those "journalists" are upset.
Dont ask what AI can do for you, ask what you can do for our AI Overlords.
😂
We report the news, we don't make it. That's the government's job. Apple is unfair competition
AI has just reached the level of incompetence coming from corporate news.
Make it an anchor over at CNN or MSNBC.
I would say that people should always be second guessing they news they receive.
no, they should just assume that big media is lying, pushing a false view of the world.
"Here, Michigan!" 😂
'They don't know what truth is'
So AI journalists are on the same level as other journalists
Isn’t this story done by journalists?
@@Mmuitd because journalism is so fraught with lies you have to evaluate yourself how truthful and trustworthy each individual story and author is.
true, its basically impossible to tell the lies produced by AI from the lies produced by "real" reporters.
Oh don’t think I was not laughing as this came across as don’t let AI mislead you…..that is our job. 😆 I also was laughing at the fact that we are having some guy read us the news. (No offense Steve, me and my wife love your commentary) It’s going to be fun.
I'm in IT as a profession, and I don't think it's hyperbole to be concerned that AI is going to be the end of rational human thought and discussion. Our blind reliance in it borders on religious fanaticism. This time, the kool-aid is digits.
Agree. People also seem to be obsessed with perceiving ai as being not much more than a calculator but with words. Weird.
Yes, it seems very weird. I mean, these models are just something well designed to generate text similar to that which a human would create (or whatever it's trained on). There doesn't seem to be anything much more, but the hype levels...
@@timbergel8147 LLMs are pretty neat tech. But there is NO intelligence to it, as you said. It is simply a eerily accurate word predictor. So yes, it can make text that looks like a human wrote it, but there is no intelligence behind it.
People don't rely on AI that much, they rely way more on fake news they heard on social media, or propaganda outlets posing as news which are often some ultra partisan political mouthpiece. Fox news was once criticized years ago for defending how they have clearly biased rightwing talk shows by arguing that "It's an entertainment show, not news".
It's all about the stock prices like Nvidia
"Sometimes, it just makes stuff up." - Sounds like the majority of news companies out there :D
You spelled "Most of the time" wrong...
They have been using AI to write for some time. Now the search engines are using AI to summarize the AI written articles.
true, all mainstream news just make up shit to fit their view of the world.
Ask A.I. to draw a clock with the hands at 8:30. See what comes back.
There is a tech term for that. It is "AI hallucinations". No kidding.
This just in from A.I.N. "Steve Lehto, CEO of Lehto Slaw Inc., wins lemon law suit over Batmobile he rented from Hertz!"
😂😂😂
Imagine if politicians were held to such a standard…
Most politicians have Dementia
Misreporting is noting new and can't be entirely blamed on AI. The first example that popped into my head was a story about the death of Lester Flatt, (a country musician and one of the writers of the Beverly Hillbillies theme.).
I saw him in a TV interview about a year later and he said they are about to find out just how dead I am.
Abe Vigoda 😂
@@NoDaysOff-oz2zl I have a vague memory of that.
It's not inaccurate... Apple programs the AI. WORKING AS INTENDED.
remember when Amazon store AI turned out to be a bunch of dudes in India?😅
Google summary AI search results are just as flawed. And the AI customer service roll out many companies have are insane, especially Amazon's.
Ben sticking out just above ‘The Other Side Of The Night’ book, just above the NY ‘LAW4NYC’ plate; second shelf, Steve’s left shoulder.
Steve. Thank you for being a real human being. Never stop being you. AI has no place here or anywhere else.
Truth is programmed in (or out) of the algorithm
Computers still don't lie,
Computers just can't tell the difference between fact from fiction.
It's in the papers. It must be true.
GIGO. Garbage in Garbage out. AI will create based on what the PROGRAMMER wants..for now.
Or what the programmer is told to do.
Apple should know better. Just wait until people take AI advice to purchase crypto. I use to love the maps AI generated to outline future global warming trends... Thanks for the video Steve, I'm afraid people will never get it.
The Internet will checkmate itself.
"Here, Michigan." Nice added touch at the end. 😂
AI has very little to do with the historically low level of trust in legacy media, they need to own that themselves.
If anything, AI probably would have a lower amount of bias
@@Subject_Keter depends on what the prompt to summarize is...
"Summarize this, and blame the Democrats"; "Summarize that, and make the Republicans look bad", and other options...
I've been using Apple products for over 30 years. Lately, the changes irritate me and I disable many of the 'features,' including never having turned Siri on. It listens as it is, but I don't want my computer actively answering me! Thank you, Steve from Michigan.
The Enshittification of absolutely everything in society will continue until morale improves!
Morale will *_never_* improve. We are spirally downwards faster than ever.
Like politicians and police, M.S.U. (Making $hit Up)... ☹️
Instead of A.I., maybe we need to coin the term "I.I." - for _Insufficient Intelligence._
When software is in beta testing, it is only given to a small amount of volunteer users known as beta testers. Someone who is close to Apple ought to pass this information along.
This saddens me greatly. While nowadays I am not professionally involved with AI, I have been involved with multiple such projects in the past (and am using this new generation of generative AI tools on my spare time), and general purpose transformers are being used in ways they should never have been used, and it is not getting better. People do not realize that older implementations, while harder to train and less accessible, at least had no chance of hallucinations. If one wants accuracy, veracity, GPT (or heck, any Alexnet derivative) is simply not capable of performing the task (and from recent published articles, it might never be at that point).
This is just a very modern and technologically advanced example of people trying to hammer a nail with a screwdriver...
AI: Automated IGNORANCE
I believe Tim Cook has gravely deteriorated Apple.
It's not "not enough workers". It's "we don't want to pay adequately, so we'll use AI for content". It's wealth concentration, and unfettered, will do tremendous damage to the public financially and civically.
Apple should start with something simple - get the weather feed on my iPhone to reflect reality... Misting the other day and my iPhone was telling me we got 33” of rain overnight.
You put chit in you get chit out.
I think another issue is that most people will not second guess most stories even if it has the 'summarised by AI' tag.
They are just trying to keep investors by forcing out incomplete tech or trying to shoehorn it into places it shouldn't be.
It should state ‘summarized by AI so it might be a lie’.
Latest news from AI was talking about the ‘ pole ice of Bernice Sanders ‘ 😂
OMG my I phone just informed me that Steve Lehto had a post, OK this one was good.
I like what you did after the Canadian Robot Lady's bit.
Crap! I just named my turtle Michigan! 🙃
Sounds like the AI has gone to sleep and is Dreaming and doesn't know what is real
Not only do most people only read headlines, AI does as well
Wow, getting shit wrong and outright fabricating stories out of nowhere? These Artificial """""Intelligence""""" models are getting more human every day!
I believe it is the word, intelligence, that is loosely applied to these entities.
And their companies. The programmers know they are not ready to be released. But the tech bros don’t care. All they see is $$$s and power trips.
Recently, there's been a TH-cam video discussing how generative AI took over freelance writers' work. Later Google made a AI video summary on it there by possibly not needing to watch the video and not getting monetization from it...
Ai generated content screwed this individual twice-
When I see the AI above search results, I just get annoyed about having to scroll to find the search results. I have read the things a couple of times, and it was enough to point me away from AI whatsoever.
For those who don't know and are curious, Michigan is an anglicization of the gallicization (i.e. it came to English via French first) of an Ojibwe word roughly pronounced "mishigami" which means "large lake".
This all boils down to large corporations don't care if something is true or not, just whether they can not pay someone
Not just "not pay someone." The more dramatic and outrageous the headline, the more clicks they get - which means the more advertising money they get. This way, they save money by cutting staff _AND_ increase incoming advertising revenue, all in one swell foop (sic).
My mother alway told me, " believe half of what you see, and one quarter of what you read." Looks like I may have to update this expression..
FYI, the Mlive article was corrected a few days later. It starts with a bolded statement saying, "Correction: A previous version of this story incorrectly translated the origin word for Michigan."
Not ready for Prime Time News.
I have yet to figure out how to send Apple feedback on anything, and Google's feedback goes straight to the proverbial bit bucket. I would be shocked if either organization used any of my suggestions.
Well to be fair.
It's only Inaccurate, because SIRI's eavesdropping skills aren't always perfect 😂
... yet 😳
Since mackinaw is derived from Ojibwa language's word for turtle, I can see that small segmental connection. Michilimackinac is Ojibwa for "Island of the Great Turtle" but that has nothing to do with the name Michiga, which is derived completely separately.
Not ready for prime time!
Although not caused by AI, that ballistic missile alert sent out all over Hawaii got somebody fired
i didnt realize it was possible to get fired for total ineptitude.
@@scottmcshannon6821 normally thats a guaranteed promotion in the government sector
NRK in norway (our main news network) Have been using ia for its sumorys for a couple of years but its always mentioned in the article what part it was used for (NOT the main part of the article etc but a small box with some information a few lines long with a couple of facts) and they claim (And i would think its true considering europeen rules and regulations) that they have humans fact checking the info from the ai before it is published. the things they used for might be info about a couple of forest fires in an article about forest fiers, number of people drowning while trying to crose from africa to europe in a article about a boat going down during the atempt and simular things.
Well...if the turtle wore a giant mitten.....
I think AI is already advanced beyond its creators and is now just f*****g with us.
If we ask for a summary of something, but then are expected to fact-check the summary to make sure it's actually true, then what's the point of these AI-summaries in the first place?!?
Also I wonder how many defamation lawsuits we're going to have in the near future from false AI-generated articles claiming things against real life people.
The deepest problem with this is that when the AI then gets asked "where does the name Michigan come from?" It will source the incorrect information that was generated by AI over and over again and keep repeating it until it becomes the truth as far as AI is concerned.
There's a state in Mexico called Michoacan. Named by their ancestors, it means "land of lakes".
So, how did a state, 3,000 miles away, get the same name, with the same meaning?!
Anytime I hear anybody died or some bizarre thing happened, I get on my search engines and I start looking
Whenever i get news i cannot easily verify myself i always question the person on whom the source is.
I did a quick search for "where did Michigan get it's name ?" It said it was an Ojibwe word meaning " big lake "
Have a great day, bad Michigan !!!!! ;)
About 40 years ago, a very smart acquaintance of mine said of A.I., "It must be artificial, because it sure ain't intelligent."
My grandmother always used to say, don't believe everything you read in the news. I'm starting to understand why I think.😂
I just asked AI to create a meaningless mishmash of words and format it as an article. This is literally some stuff that people have posted online before; oh boy...
I've been saying for years, due to AI we have no reason to believe anything unless we were physically there.
That's how I like to think of anything anyone tells me.
Aren't notifications already key details only?
They have given AI generated news content real names for years now. A recent example is the AI accounts Meta had announced. They showed names, profiles, pictures, bios, everything.
I used to say the artificial intelligence had absolutely no creativity because it only spits out what it is picked up. However, I changed my mind for the most part. It is very creative and comes up with all kinds of things. Nobody else would come up with in real life.
Ben is on top of the books above the LAW4NYC tag
Will I jinx myself if I say Where's Bill?
And Good Morning Ben
@@Bobs-Wrigles5555 Cat’s fed, coffe is almost done.
G’nite Bob. 😂
I just had a job interview yesterday... it was horrible... everything went swirling down the drain when I couldn't answer how I've been using AI technology and how it has improved my personal life. This was not a technical job in any way. I'm dead serious.
They did you a favor.
AI should be considered as military intelligence, which is an oxymoron
It's basically the same thing as mainstream news.
Ben Hundo's poking out from The Other Side of the Night...above the upper left corner of the New York W4NYC license plate, 2nd shelf right, above Steve's shoulder
I don't know what to call it because artificial intelligence doesn't seem to be intelligent.
🤔 AG = Artificial Garbage maybe…
The world is ignorant enough already. We do not need
Artificial
Ignorance.
They need a Maxwell's Demon of the Second Kind, as described in Stanislaw Lem's Cyberiad, The PHT Pirate. Once the Maxwell's Demon generates a random datum, a Maxwell's Demon of the Second Kind is needed to determine if it's true. Once the PhT Pirate got his source of Truth, he needed a Maxwell's Demon of the Third Kind, to measure Relevance.
A.I.??? Maybe it is the "I" that needs redefined. How about "Artificial Imagination."
9:05 I had a pet turtle for a few years. She never came when called. On the other hand I did see a turtle attempt to jump through a hoop of fire on Letterman's Stupid Pet Tricks 🙂
Who do you sue for libel or slander?
Apple is probably thinking, "Dang it, this means we have to pay those pesky humans for a little longer. My poor profit margin!"
Well... here we go. Not like anyone predicted this. 🙄
Now add that to Meta's decision to drop fact-checking in favor of free speech (AKA Lies are just alternative facts.)
Zuckerbot 😅
@@NoDaysOff-oz2zl
I don't think my post means what you think it does. Comprehension is hard.
Unfortunately, fact checking doesn’t increase the bottom line. These billionaires think we’re stupid enough to believe their intentions are noble. Once upon a time, they might have been but their big money support of authoritarianism proves there’s so there there.
This is a situation where the board of directors should be be personally financially libel for all harm created by the product of their company.
"To err is human, but to really foul things up you need a computer".
- Paul R. Ehrlich.
We can assume that AI will not replace journalists any time soon.
Why not? It appears to be performing an identical role in just making shit up.
It depends on whether you think the job of journalists is to find the truth or to get your attention and money. If it is the latter, AI is ready.
@@oklahomahank2378 I think the job of a journalist is to investigate our leadership and hold them to account, and we do have some who do just that.
Does the Peter principal apply to artificial intelligence as well?
Michigan was named after a turtle - a Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle - Michaelangelo. They badly mispronounced his name and hence - MICHIGAN. (There. THAT ought to feed the AI bots for a while.)
LOL
April (the lady the month is named after) can confirm this as fact since she is an actual reporter 😉. She is off today as she has a splinter to deal with
I hope AI will never be ready for things like this, at least in my lifetime.
I lost it at "here, Michigan"
I'm looking at eytmonline and there seems to be evidence of turtles in the discussion, but at the core, it says 'perhaps from Old Ojibwa (Algonquian) *meshi-gami "big lake."' So, perhaps? What did they teach you?
I can't wait to pay a subscription for web3 AI generated news-based NFTs.
How is AI supposed to not hallucinate when most news articles are already hallucinations?