How Small is an Atom?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 ก.พ. 2017
  • The size of an atom is only a few angstroms at most - there are 10 billion angstroms in 1 meter. This video also goes the basic parts of an atom (protons, neutrons, and electrons) and why the traditional model of the atom is not correct. Electrons are unpredictable - we can't know the path that they travel. Most importantly - they don't orbit the nucleus.
    For the curious minded:
    -Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle states that the position and velocity cannot both be measured at the same time
    -The orbital is only about a 95% probability of finding the electron - it could still be found outside.
    -Electrons can even be described as a wave (in addition to a particle) occupying the whole orbital at once.
    Made with Blender 2.78a
    Music:
    Call to Adventure - Comedy by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license (creativecommons.org/licenses/...)
    Source: incompetech.com/music/royalty-...
    Artist: incompetech.com/
    Sources:
    www.nobeliefs.com/atom.htm
    www.universetoday.com/38282/el...
    www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/Petrology...
    #chemisty #physics #b3d
  • ภาพยนตร์และแอนิเมชัน

ความคิดเห็น • 1.6K

  • @jhes52105
    @jhes52105 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1643

    I am a chemist with a master degree in chemistry, and I have to say that this is not something that is easy to understand and explain, so I admire your intelligent and the effort :D

    • @imadakhunkhail3360
      @imadakhunkhail3360 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      You say ture

    • @vigneshkumar1566
      @vigneshkumar1566 4 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      I am chemist Indian hii

    • @sontubanerjee9949
      @sontubanerjee9949 4 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      I am in high school but I got a clear idea about everything from Heisenberg's uncertanity principle,shapes of orbitals,filling of electrons to Schrodinger's atomic model.

    • @technical1359
      @technical1359 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      sir would u like to make video over orbitals

    • @rashidnn1367
      @rashidnn1367 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yes

  • @ailiasim
    @ailiasim 2 ปีที่แล้ว +166

    Your animation and explanation of a few minutes is better than whole chapters of textbooks and tens of hours of learning and infinite hours of trying to understand this.

    • @JaredOwen
      @JaredOwen  2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Glad to help😁

    • @princeclassen
      @princeclassen ปีที่แล้ว

      Where do you study man ??
      Probably you don't have reading habit.
      Even if you will read it through the book,
      You will get it.
      🤣

    • @RajKumar-ws3oq
      @RajKumar-ws3oq ปีที่แล้ว

      Yup, got some clarity of that concept after watching this

    • @neetaspirants594
      @neetaspirants594 ปีที่แล้ว

      Gud To see some shias on TH-cam ♥️
      I Am also Shia Muslim

  • @DipanjanAdhikary18
    @DipanjanAdhikary18 4 ปีที่แล้ว +700

    Only legends know that they watched
    JJ Thompson, Rutherford, Chadwick ,Bohr, Heisenberg, De Broglie, Schroedinger's theories in just 5 minutes .

  • @theswapniljagtap
    @theswapniljagtap 5 ปีที่แล้ว +559

    Ohhh, so that's the reason I failed in chemistry.

  • @_baller
    @_baller 4 ปีที่แล้ว +62

    Electrons are like camera flashes at a stadium

    • @masonjelvin6001
      @masonjelvin6001 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      good fucking analogy

    • @marvaabyu197
      @marvaabyu197 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Damn.. it was in fact, a good fucking analogy

  • @bas9682
    @bas9682 4 ปีที่แล้ว +582

    So an electron is just a dvd logo bouncing on your screen.

    • @hbt25
      @hbt25 4 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      Underrated comment

    • @greenlemon3028
      @greenlemon3028 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      So true lmao

    • @marck0060
      @marck0060 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      No it's the default Windows XP screensaver

    • @Fazielhammadi
      @Fazielhammadi 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      An electron is just a dvd logo touching the corner of your monitor. Its unpredictable. 😁

    • @jimmynobody8344
      @jimmynobody8344 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mine Bomber not really. You think it’s gonna hit the corner, but it never does.

  • @donnypangilinan2636
    @donnypangilinan2636 5 ปีที่แล้ว +192

    there's so many scientists here...
    and I'm like an ancient human watching the video only for damn school projects
    Btw, it's a helpful video :)

    • @JaredOwen
      @JaredOwen  5 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      Glad my video is helping Donny! Good luck on the project

    • @sanchits.4785
      @sanchits.4785 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Yup, apparently, i didn't knew that scientist revealing who they are are so common on yt. Damn, scientists saying, "I'm a scientist" on every science video.

    • @dragongamer9160
      @dragongamer9160 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      R you really donny??!!

    • @farhanaf832
      @farhanaf832 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We can help scientists by processing data from boinc distributed computing software ♥️

  • @AJOlesen
    @AJOlesen 4 ปีที่แล้ว +349

    Jared: “what is the smallest thing you can think of?”
    Me: quarks

    • @The_zenithgod
      @The_zenithgod 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Fr that’s what I thought

    • @person8064
      @person8064 4 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      Plank's length or string theory

    • @AJOlesen
      @AJOlesen 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Person GG man, I don’t think their something smaller than that

    • @ahmedabuswerih316
      @ahmedabuswerih316 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      AJ Olesen Jared owen : hold my quarks

    • @niekparidaens8170
      @niekparidaens8170 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      or the higgs particle

  • @rajk.9098
    @rajk.9098 4 ปีที่แล้ว +673

    I whish my teacher could explain like this when I was in college!

  • @ChacingBugs
    @ChacingBugs 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Possibly the simplest most concise explanation of the difference between orbit and orbitals that I've come across. Thanks!

  • @arindamsarkar370
    @arindamsarkar370 3 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    This video is so brilliantly put together! The animation went hand-in-hand with the narration and gave a good perspective on what's bigger and what's smaller; which comes first and whioch comes later? The size and order was aptly explained. Thank you!

  • @EnerJetix
    @EnerJetix 4 ปีที่แล้ว +95

    Just so I can remember when I watch this...
    1 Angstrom=100 Femtometers
    Edit: Thanks past me

    • @ahmedaltaf12131
      @ahmedaltaf12131 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Lmao

    • @m.w.kaplan447
      @m.w.kaplan447 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      aint got no one but yourself in this world

    • @EnerJetix
      @EnerJetix 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@zoraizahmad6536 no.

    • @supernatural_forces
      @supernatural_forces 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Smaller than Nanometers there are Picometers. Then there are Femtometers ?
      And, quarks are measured in Femtometers, the Nucleus of an atom are known as quarks. Which is possibly the smallest particle the microscopes can see.

  • @rawmyaaj2325
    @rawmyaaj2325 6 ปีที่แล้ว +207

    So reality is basically vibrating energy.

    • @tonezstonezkonez575
      @tonezstonezkonez575 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      rawm yaaj ....yip, kinda like our "consciousness"

    • @rawmyaaj2325
      @rawmyaaj2325 6 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      tonez I think when they say God created us in his image... I think they're talking about consciousness. Seem like consciousness is immaterial, but is the only real thing that truly exist.

    • @morningmadera
      @morningmadera 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      lol

    • @acmefixer1
      @acmefixer1 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Mr. ConcealedCheese
      So, are you available to do magic shows for kids?? :-O

    • @fabian8813
      @fabian8813 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Cheers for the Video! Sorry for chiming in, I would love your initial thoughts. Have you tried - Taparton Growing Program Takeover (search on google)? It is a great one off guide for learning how to get a bigger manhood minus the headache. Ive heard some super things about it and my work buddy after a lifetime of fighting got excellent success with it.

  • @YoDay
    @YoDay 4 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    I thought orbitals and orbits are same.
    TH-cam > School
    Thanks!

    • @CrypticFate5
      @CrypticFate5 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Jeet Pratap Singh you've written it otherway round.... orbitals are the area where the probability of finding an electron is max..

  • @chrism3344
    @chrism3344 5 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Best explanation I've ever seen..so easy to understand..well done fellow!

  • @BlackElon1
    @BlackElon1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Short ... sweet... simple.... and the BEST part is that it's understandable.... I LOVE IT!. thank you

  • @tarangpatil6952
    @tarangpatil6952 6 ปีที่แล้ว +150

    Why not just tell them about Heisenbergs Uncertainity Principle

    • @dankhank8569
      @dankhank8569 5 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Tarang Patil If we want to learn how to make meth we will look it up.

    • @giantsquid2
      @giantsquid2 5 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      Because as he stated, he wanted to keep it simple

    • @narendramodicommunistversi4466
      @narendramodicommunistversi4466 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      That is because, wouldnyou understand any bits of Schrödinger's wave equation on 9th standard? You need to know advanced mathematics like calculus, surds and logs for that.

    • @sontubanerjee9949
      @sontubanerjee9949 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sure

    • @sontubanerjee9949
      @sontubanerjee9949 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@narendramodicommunistversi4466
      It was the reason for the failure of Bhor's atomic model.

  • @geekdiggy
    @geekdiggy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    school teacher: sit down and lemme learn you some science
    jared owen: i'm bout to wreck this man's whole career

  • @shaurya_aggarwal_G
    @shaurya_aggarwal_G 3 ปีที่แล้ว +88

    Hey Jared, I m a PCM student.
    This video was amazing since it allows us to easily visualize about this topic but I have small request here
    Can u pls pls pls make another video on this topic covering more topics deeply
    It will be really helpful for students......
    Pls pls pls
    I m requesting this from u coz after watching ur video I came to know that u r the only person who can turn this topic into realistic animation
    Sir pls pls pls help
    It will be really helpful
    I promise that I will be sharing that to all my frns....

    • @Anonymous-kw7ls
      @Anonymous-kw7ls 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      There are other TH-cam channels too who cover such science topics very easily and explain them in animated form.

    • @mumkichux
      @mumkichux 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Anonymous-kw7ls please tell me some. I will be grateful ☺️

    • @Saf4ron469
      @Saf4ron469 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Really I need it too...I'm also a PCM student...🖖🖖🖖 videos like this really make things easier..

    • @mumkichux
      @mumkichux 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Saf4ron469 u can refer to TYLER DEWITT videos for chemistry . He's a great guy

    • @mumkichux
      @mumkichux 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@Saf4ron469 I just came here coz of that atomic structure chapter. that's hard 😕

  • @RealClassyStudios
    @RealClassyStudios 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Why are all the TH-camrs that would make great teachers not teachers and we’re stuck with “refer to page [Number] in the Textbook”
    Love your content dude

  • @KarimdadSamim
    @KarimdadSamim 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    What a fantastic description!!!!
    Love this.
    I hope you to share more chemistry teaching videos.

  • @carlosnieto3189
    @carlosnieto3189 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Your Animation techniques accelerate the insight of one's mind... Good Job!

  • @johnathanlee2367
    @johnathanlee2367 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    short and simple explanations to clarify complicated idea, plus your amusing animation clear everything. Ive been searching sth like this

    • @JaredOwen
      @JaredOwen  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad you like it Johnathan!

  • @aquibkhan9385
    @aquibkhan9385 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Thanks, this helped me visualize chemistry. Thank you 😭😭

  • @wigo54
    @wigo54 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thanks Jared, this is by far the clearest and simplest explanation of what an atom is like! This is great! Gongratulations!

  • @nafishsarwar2077
    @nafishsarwar2077 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    This is what Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is all about. Very nicely explained. Thanks.

    • @amanrthosarart2280
      @amanrthosarart2280 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      allaboutchemistry123.blogspot.com/2020/04/atoms-and-molecules-what-are-atoms-and-molecules.html

    • @sajeeshbabucherappatta8413
      @sajeeshbabucherappatta8413 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      why heisannberg invent this principle🥺🥺 lead to made chemistry with unlimted studies materials from schools

  • @larrypatterson3957
    @larrypatterson3957 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great animations and explanations!

  • @AMadKerbal
    @AMadKerbal 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You explain better than a whole chapter on an atom.

  • @khush4236
    @khush4236 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Group of atoms, seeing a group of atoms on a group of atoms that how small an atom is....!

  • @OddlyTugs
    @OddlyTugs 7 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Another great video fella, thanks!

    • @MalminOG
      @MalminOG 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      NOTHING BETTER THAN CHEERIOS

  • @thecreativekanha5181
    @thecreativekanha5181 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Obviously the best video for understanding the concept

  • @babygoatjuice9508
    @babygoatjuice9508 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Keep it up bro, great video

  • @DAILYTECHNEED
    @DAILYTECHNEED 6 ปีที่แล้ว +129

    make it more more complex please

    • @filthyfilter2798
      @filthyfilter2798 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      :D y indeed :D
      it looked really interesting ^_^

    • @JaredOwen
      @JaredOwen  6 ปีที่แล้ว +54

      What should I go more in depth on? I plan on making a follow up video in the future. I think orbitals is a topic I'd like to do more of

    • @DAILYTECHNEED
      @DAILYTECHNEED 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Jared Owen that would be great and thanks a lot for the reply.

    • @undertheradar4645
      @undertheradar4645 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Perhaps break down four quantum numbers.

    • @PavelSTL
      @PavelSTL 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @Jared "What should I go more in depth on? "
      I would try to explain what electrons are in the context of Quantum Field theory, since that's the "right" way of thinking about matter these days. So an electron is a perturbation in a "electron" field (like a photon is a perturbation in an EM field), but what does that mean?

  • @Gurseerat_Singh
    @Gurseerat_Singh ปีที่แล้ว +6

    In India we learn this in school instead of college

    • @ub__fy
      @ub__fy หลายเดือนก่อน

      That most of us never needed to learn

    • @ub__fy
      @ub__fy หลายเดือนก่อน

      In the school

  • @SagarYadav-jd9lv
    @SagarYadav-jd9lv 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What a great explanation of atom!

  • @TheCrapuleus
    @TheCrapuleus 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Quite instructive. Thank you for your work.

    • @JaredOwen
      @JaredOwen  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Your welcome! thanks for watching

  • @dek5775
    @dek5775 5 ปีที่แล้ว +171

    Do flat earthers believe in atoms?

    • @Max_Jacoby
      @Max_Jacoby 4 ปีที่แล้ว +74

      Only if they are flat.

    • @Akyomi777
      @Akyomi777 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@Max_Jacoby lmao you killed it

    • @That_One_Guy...
      @That_One_Guy... 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      They believe an atom is a cube

    • @user-xf1we9lm1e
      @user-xf1we9lm1e 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Makes me wonder if all the flat-earthers’ wives have flat chests 🤔

    • @Hartfeltet
      @Hartfeltet 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      They call em Flatoms

  • @inzpired3371
    @inzpired3371 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    WORLD Best Knowledge.
    Bestest Vedio.
    No comment

  • @FOR_THE_Pascal.
    @FOR_THE_Pascal. 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Finally, a clear and precise explanation!

  • @lingarajlingaraj1795
    @lingarajlingaraj1795 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for your animation I was not getting idea for orbital thanks for it

  • @Xrossbot
    @Xrossbot 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Finally after finding lots of video... Got this masterpiece

  • @awayforthewin1325
    @awayforthewin1325 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Your channel is lit
    You deserve more attention

  • @ahmedabuswerih316
    @ahmedabuswerih316 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    your explanation is the best . keep it going

  • @EDUTAINMENT56
    @EDUTAINMENT56 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really good animation for better understanding

  • @TaiFerret
    @TaiFerret 6 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    What if atoms have more dimensions than we have on our scale?

  • @inverted_paradox4170
    @inverted_paradox4170 5 ปีที่แล้ว +205

    Americans: who is meter?

    • @FobbitMike
      @FobbitMike 4 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      meter is a good guy. I call him Bill.

    • @belashetye3868
      @belashetye3868 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      @@FobbitMike do you know I found that meter is married to litre???😂😂😂😂

    • @Greenierw
      @Greenierw 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@belashetye3868 and do you know their son centimeter?

    • @belashetye3868
      @belashetye3868 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@Greenierw omg yeah I do... he's a really good kid.😂😂😂😂

    • @stevepr100
      @stevepr100 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Latest addition to brood is smaller than the rest.......Micro meter😱

  • @cerdaskimia
    @cerdaskimia 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This video is amazing ! Thank you Jared

  • @Amer-vd4kd
    @Amer-vd4kd 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey, I like your videos. The simple animation style reminds me of those old instructional videos. It gives me old vibes.

  • @keshavbajaj9308
    @keshavbajaj9308 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    It's incredible how you explained something for which teachers take 2-3 hours of classes in 5 minutes.

  • @jumandas3198
    @jumandas3198 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    explain it in terms of quantum mechanics

  • @maryamb.d.w4301
    @maryamb.d.w4301 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much jared owen for your simple explanation

  • @boofang10
    @boofang10 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    All the same, a BRILLIANT VIDEO, Jared !!! 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 .. simple yet impressionable

  • @KevinGeneFeldman
    @KevinGeneFeldman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    An interesting thought I've always had about motion. Think of life like pixels, how movement on the screen jumps from one pixel to the next pixel. Now scale down movement in real life to the smallest grid of spacial positioning, so obviously we can move a distance and then break down all the tiny measurements of movements between it and then all of the tiny measurements of movement between the between, but once you get down to the atomic level, whats the tiny measurements of movements between the space of one atom to the adjacent one? How does one move an atoms distance and not be able to further break down the movement with ever more infinitely expanding integers of measurement? At some point don't we just...teleport places? were in this space and then instantly we're in the next, because there is no more space between.

    • @doomtho42
      @doomtho42 ปีที่แล้ว

      That’s kinda/sorta the idea of planck length. Although I think it’s also important to remember that reality often does not align with our intuition, and that just because something is intellectually satisfying and/or makes intuitive sense doesn’t mean it’s true.

  • @lohphat
    @lohphat 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Ångstrom needs the ring above the “A”. Like other languages which use accents, leaving it off is considered a spelling error as the sound is changed.

    • @JaredOwen
      @JaredOwen  5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      yeah I probably should have added that in...

  • @doremon-ug3tr
    @doremon-ug3tr 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Now the concept is clear thenks!!!! For making this video ..... ❤ the explanation was super cool.......hats off to your work 👍🏿

  • @geetamalik5317
    @geetamalik5317 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very good explanation.Thanks

  • @SWARAJSINGH2008
    @SWARAJSINGH2008 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    This is very ironic that still today we hold the belief that electron's position is not predictable. The true statement should be that the position of electron is predictable but we have no data or technology to observe and predict the same.
    Actually the electron is bound to rotate around the nucleus to generate the required outer or centrifugal force and at the same time it undergoes the effects due to various electric and magnetic forces acting upon it caused by the motion of nearby electrons. We are not technologically advanced enough to know the static position of all the electrons and their velocity vectors simultaneously, which is must to generate or simulate the position of any electron.

    • @FobbitMike
      @FobbitMike 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This is not a belief. My friend, you need to study quantum mechanics before making such comments.

    • @SWARAJSINGH2008
      @SWARAJSINGH2008 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@FobbitMike, QM is not able to give the real picture, as our brain or intelligence can visualize. No matter how small and fast a particle is, it is obeying every rule of physics, it's position or motion is exactly according to physics and mathematics, but it's speed being close to light and size being so small, we are unable to observe and analyse. Further the motion of electron is under the influence of too many varying forces, because of the other charged particles motion nearby which generates electric and magnetic forces, causing the electron to continually change it's course making wave like motion instead of straight motion . The motion is not random or without a cause, but is so complex that neither we can observe nor we could compute.

    • @wootle
      @wootle 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SWARAJSINGH2008
      You are completely mistaken. The normal rules of physics break down at the quantum level. It is exactly as Jared said. We cannot predict exactly where an electron will be. Just the ACT of observing affects the outcome. Sounds freaky but its true.

    • @negasonicteenagewarhead
      @negasonicteenagewarhead 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SWARAJSINGH2008 but electrons have dual nature

  • @9_1.1
    @9_1.1 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    using this, there is ~2,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 or about two nonillion hydrogen atoms in a meter^3 block of pure hydrogen (assuming they’re all packed together)

  • @subhradeepghosh2523
    @subhradeepghosh2523 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A great video with epic background music!

  • @vinaytiwari7528
    @vinaytiwari7528 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fentasttic!!! Bro please make more videos like this ☺
    Thank you 🙂

  • @ammyhunt3613
    @ammyhunt3613 5 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    In India we learn this in higher school not in College

    • @ghantasalaravindrakumar4057
      @ghantasalaravindrakumar4057 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      ammyhunt yes right from 6th onwards...........

    • @mahender1
      @mahender1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@devnampriyapriyadarshi1331 bro didn't you read 11th chemistry book it is there in perhaps 2-3 chapter about orbitals and its shape

    • @nisargbhavsar25
      @nisargbhavsar25 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Correct

    • @twelvegr
      @twelvegr 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      And we are thought this in high school not only India siss

  • @09Rickhunter
    @09Rickhunter 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I give science class to 6th graders. I taught em something similar. I'm happy to know that my class wasn't that bad! 😅

    • @disht2
      @disht2 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Good thing youre not an English teacher.....

    • @09Rickhunter
      @09Rickhunter 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@disht2 why?

    • @disht2
      @disht2 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@09Rickhunter "I give science class to 6th graders."

  • @SaadAliArts
    @SaadAliArts 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Your animation is amazing. Please make more videos of science, buildings and space

    • @JaredOwen
      @JaredOwen  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Coming up soon! thanks Saad

  • @bhushandhuri2660
    @bhushandhuri2660 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for this video. Now I can understand concept effectively.

  • @emrazum
    @emrazum 5 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Before clicking I was like psssh here's another bs physics videos that says atoms are like small solar systems, but you went Quantum with it, Loved it!!

  • @Spherey
    @Spherey 5 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    If a nucleus is made of quarks, then what are quarks made of?

    • @imnotcalm4875
      @imnotcalm4875 5 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      *TOP 10 QUESTIONS SCIENTIST STILL CAN'T ANSWER*

    • @SuryanIsaac
      @SuryanIsaac 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      energy

    • @deathbyseatoast8854
      @deathbyseatoast8854 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      *Thanos*

    • @Prxwler
      @Prxwler 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Quarks are elemental particles

    • @ronaldvlogs5527
      @ronaldvlogs5527 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      if u have been taught in chemistry class a quark is combined to form many particles called hadrons it is the most stable of which are protons and neutrons

  • @jeelrajodiya5308
    @jeelrajodiya5308 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks very much I was so confused about the orbit and orbital now it is clear

  • @roseescritor8894
    @roseescritor8894 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for your efforts on explaining.💕

  • @Answers721
    @Answers721 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hi Jared. Just found your channel and you make great animation videos. I was curious on what software you use. Is it affordable for someone just having fun? I've been trying to find software to visualize income. Any software that can make pennies, nickels, quarters $1 $5 $10 $20 $50 $100. If you know of any please let me know. Great animation on showing how small atoms are.

    • @JaredOwen
      @JaredOwen  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for your comment...though I have to admit you have an interesting channel name. I use a software called blender which is completely free. You can find it here: www.blender.org

    • @Answers721
      @Answers721 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks I will look at the link tomorrow. As for my username, it represents what a joke politics is and represents that our leader Donald Trump should be the biggest clown of them all. For my avatar, I get my inspiration from 4chan and they believe he is an ancient Egyptian god frog.

  • @johnnyroy9830
    @johnnyroy9830 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    1:56 *As a Bharatiya (better known as Indians), it is quiet disappointing for me to see and hear from the world the fact that the Greeks researched everything. The innumerable ideas and inventions and discoveries, from atoms to radios to airplanes as well, originally germinated in this great country, but are now proudly published by others as their own work. When the world didn't even know to speak, Bharat was the only country to have had universities. The most scientific language known to the world, The Holy Sanskrit, originated here. The first successful surgery was carried out here. The very first well-developed civilization flourished in the Indus valley. There's a lot more for which you'll probably need a lifetime (or maybe two). And all these things took place around 5000BC !!!*
    *Hope you understated. Thank you*

    • @blueeye2281
      @blueeye2281 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I know bro how it feels. Actually those damn British are the reason we are so underrated.

    • @issaaczala5125
      @issaaczala5125 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Do "Bharat" existed before 1950 ?
      Any proof or reference ?
      All what you have cited is myth.
      Before 3000 years existing India was belong to Buddha, not hindu.
      Read facts please not myths.

    • @johnnyroy9830
      @johnnyroy9830 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@issaaczala5125 😂😂😂

    • @johnnyroy9830
      @johnnyroy9830 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@issaaczala5125I appreciate your knowledge sir...😂😁😂😂

    • @johnnyroy9830
      @johnnyroy9830 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@issaaczala5125 Surely from "Foxford University"😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @imranhaider8248
    @imranhaider8248 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Best animations i have ever seen.. hats off

  • @aliabubakar1426
    @aliabubakar1426 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wish I have learn this since I was in Chemistry class, keep blowing it Jared...

  • @40watt53
    @40watt53 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Jared: Whats the smallest thing you can think of?
    Me: Fundamental Particles.
    Jared: ...okay then

    • @vehicleboi5598
      @vehicleboi5598 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      How about......
      *the fabric of space itself?*

    • @edin101
      @edin101 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think my male reproductive organ is smaller. There are children that might read this.

  • @vishalrana9836
    @vishalrana9836 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Wow superb video... Speechless

  • @udaysingh5167
    @udaysingh5167 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent
    It cleared my concepts.

  • @APoxyR8
    @APoxyR8 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I finally understand the uncertainty principle. I always you couldn’t know position and velocity together. Either one or the other but I never knew why. This animation cleared this for me.

    • @JaredOwen
      @JaredOwen  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad to help Alex!

  • @saathwikaithal7403
    @saathwikaithal7403 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    1:03 virus has RNA 🤣🤣🤣

    • @ice0817
      @ice0817 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Every living thing has dna

    • @ivanminjares3758
      @ivanminjares3758 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@ice0817 that is true but first of all viruses are technically not alive and 2nd a virus has RNA not DNA and please don't spam this emoji -----> 🤓

  • @coolbro8922
    @coolbro8922 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I guess DNA is more popular than RNA

  • @vinaymanthri6742
    @vinaymanthri6742 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have never seen such video with that much clear understanding
    Thank you so much sir

    • @JaredOwen
      @JaredOwen  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You are most welcome!

  • @chinmaydeo3711
    @chinmaydeo3711 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is one of the best short recap videos (if not, these best) on atomic structure. Well done!
    P.S- the orbitals are shown in a great way, they are generally very hard to understand!

  • @ani3731
    @ani3731 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Atomic structure in 5 mins 😂😂😂

    • @amanrthosarart2280
      @amanrthosarart2280 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      allaboutchemistry123.blogspot.com/2020/04/atoms-and-molecules-what-are-atoms-and-molecules.html

  • @hkayakh
    @hkayakh 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Bro you should colab with kurzgesagt

  • @daamu48
    @daamu48 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Super presentation. An excellent contribution to the children to enhance their scientific knowledge.

  • @prashantdhage5662
    @prashantdhage5662 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your explanation is excellent

  • @marceloazotief3144
    @marceloazotief3144 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Paradoxes of atomism
    If it were possible to continue the division of matter indefinitely, I would have thought it more probable that this process could be carried out to infinity (thesis of infinite divisibility, contrary to atomistic antithesis).
    The problem is that we can not and do not have the colossal force to do this, because we are physically limited, we can only at most split up to a few fractions of sand, because we can not get the pieces too small to be divided again and so on , only the cosmic forces of the universe could make or a God out of infinite power.
    It results in unsustainable paradoxes and absurdities to defend the thesis of the existence of indivisible material entities / elements, the atoms, as they considered Democritus and Leucippus, a thesis that Aristotle correctly rejected.
    Why do we have to accept the existence of atoms if experience shows us that all compound bodies are divisible indefinitely to our last tactile-sensitive limits?
    If all the material elements are breakable into smaller parts, from the softest to the hardest, an iron bar when we hit it kneads and looses small pieces of metal and sparks of fire - energy, revealing its divisibility to us, why then do we have to to accept that atoms (indivisible fragments of matter) exist?
    This atomistic thesis leads us to the paradox well demonstrated by Anaxagoras and Aristotle, that the parts are greater than the sum of the whole, for the components of the self are indivisible and not eternal. The results are the only and most perfect to be realized in all corpus of corruptible and mortal, which results in the refutation of atomism by reduction to the absurd.
    Another paradox reveals itself is not a fact of existing atoms but is not necessarily indivisible, it is not necessary to prepare an atom for its existence, for who can be indivisible, the ultimate of existence, eternal, indestructible, immune to all sorts of shocks and destructions. Existing and eternal exist, to probe and to separate the various clusters in concentrated points without space, resulting in an inexistence of cohesion / physical concretion and consequent non-existence of visualizing the bodies and material bodies! In what results in a further logical - qualitative refutation of atomism, by a new reduction to the absurd.
    And finally, indivisible and eternal atoms unite with other equally indivisible and eternal atoms, through connections made of finite and divisible matter as is our physical - corporeal composition and that of all the animate and inanimate bodies of the world, is an absurd total in this thesis, for where would arise a divisible and finite matter that binds atoms, if these same atoms are all indivisible, eternal and indestructible particles? Of the very primordial atoms that gave birth to the whole universe? But would a finite and divisible matter arising from indivisible and eternal atoms not be an unacceptable corruption of the eternal and indivisible essence of atoms? An indivisible atom that gives rise to a divisible matter would not have to possess the germ of divisibility in its essence, revealing in the truth that it is no atom, but a corruptible and perfectly divisible matter, which would refute the very Democritean thesis of existence of atoms?
    Do you perceive so much of metaphysical absurdities, paradoxes, and idiosyncrasies that the theory of atoms has borne since over 2600 years ago?
    In the antithesis to the atomist theory, we can not observe and test the process of division ad infinitum, because obviously we have spatial and physical - temporal limits, but at least it is indirectly based on ordinary experience, being a much more rational and scientific hypothesis than considering the hypothesis of finite divisibility in final and eternal atoms, for we have no example of phenomenon or object observable in experience that is indivisible, indestructible, incorruptible, and eternal, whereas for the philosophical hypothesis of indefinite or infinite divisibility we have the support of a sensory experience that all objects, bodies and physical phenomena are divisible or decomposable into smaller, corruptible and destructible parts!

    • @weiner3393
      @weiner3393 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      what

    • @weiner3393
      @weiner3393 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      This comment is too much for my brain

  • @PawanYadav-em5bm
    @PawanYadav-em5bm 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir your explanation is amazing . Thx for it

  • @advanceringnewholder
    @advanceringnewholder 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    wow, I never really understand orbitals until I watch this video. thank you so much for the knowledge.

  • @anirbanseall
    @anirbanseall 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's literally awesome animation @jaredowen.
    You had covered all the basic theory of atom in just 4.51 min .
    In high schools in India we have separate chapter on this topic and we were taught 1 week on this topic.

  • @peterv4189
    @peterv4189 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yep Jared, Do another on Orbitals! We're keen!

  • @durairam976
    @durairam976 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Superb animation and background score

  • @Roberto-REME
    @Roberto-REME 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Jared, you did an outstanding job producing the video as well as the narration. Really well done! Too short though. Now, please tackle a). the nature of light, b). the speed of light, c). the double slit experiment, d). quantum physics..... 😁

    • @JaredOwen
      @JaredOwen  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Roberto - I will do more videos like this in the future!

  • @awaisahmed5489
    @awaisahmed5489 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Man God bless you for your hard work really appreciate your hard working

  • @KershalJC
    @KershalJC 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Jeez the visuals on this is so good.

  • @anshulgoyal111
    @anshulgoyal111 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great explanation!
    The video name is less descriptive of the content...
    How small is an atom and how detailed is it's structure.
    something like that.
    Thank you for such a great video. It's perfect.

  • @chelsealangel3843
    @chelsealangel3843 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I used to hate my chemistry class way back in college days. Explaining like this would help a lot even now it's helping.

  • @rd6336
    @rd6336 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Your vedios are best. So go on in making such necessary vedios. Thanks bro.

  • @BlackWolf6420
    @BlackWolf6420 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    finally I was explained the atoms as they really are. Thank you :)

  • @raja_khan_jcd
    @raja_khan_jcd 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Best way to explain and to uderstand
    Excellent keep it up

  • @amitsaxena6175
    @amitsaxena6175 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent it helps to understand and also removes misunderstanding in children

  • @12sjdjsisis
    @12sjdjsisis 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent explanation.thanks