I am a chemist with a master degree in chemistry, and I have to say that this is not something that is easy to understand and explain, so I admire your intelligent and the effort :D
I am in high school but I got a clear idea about everything from Heisenberg's uncertanity principle,shapes of orbitals,filling of electrons to Schrodinger's atomic model.
Your animation and explanation of a few minutes is better than whole chapters of textbooks and tens of hours of learning and infinite hours of trying to understand this.
Yup, apparently, i didn't knew that scientist revealing who they are are so common on yt. Damn, scientists saying, "I'm a scientist" on every science video.
Why are all the TH-camrs that would make great teachers not teachers and we’re stuck with “refer to page [Number] in the Textbook” Love your content dude
That is because, wouldnyou understand any bits of Schrödinger's wave equation on 9th standard? You need to know advanced mathematics like calculus, surds and logs for that.
Hey Jared, I m a PCM student. This video was amazing since it allows us to easily visualize about this topic but I have small request here Can u pls pls pls make another video on this topic covering more topics deeply It will be really helpful for students...... Pls pls pls I m requesting this from u coz after watching ur video I came to know that u r the only person who can turn this topic into realistic animation Sir pls pls pls help It will be really helpful I promise that I will be sharing that to all my frns....
This video is so brilliantly put together! The animation went hand-in-hand with the narration and gave a good perspective on what's bigger and what's smaller; which comes first and whioch comes later? The size and order was aptly explained. Thank you!
Smaller than Nanometers there are Picometers. Then there are Femtometers ? And, quarks are measured in Femtometers, the Nucleus of an atom are known as quarks. Which is possibly the smallest particle the microscopes can see.
tonez I think when they say God created us in his image... I think they're talking about consciousness. Seem like consciousness is immaterial, but is the only real thing that truly exist.
Cheers for the Video! Sorry for chiming in, I would love your initial thoughts. Have you tried - Taparton Growing Program Takeover (search on google)? It is a great one off guide for learning how to get a bigger manhood minus the headache. Ive heard some super things about it and my work buddy after a lifetime of fighting got excellent success with it.
1:56 *As a Bharatiya (better known as Indians), it is quiet disappointing for me to see and hear from the world the fact that the Greeks researched everything. The innumerable ideas and inventions and discoveries, from atoms to radios to airplanes as well, originally germinated in this great country, but are now proudly published by others as their own work. When the world didn't even know to speak, Bharat was the only country to have had universities. The most scientific language known to the world, The Holy Sanskrit, originated here. The first successful surgery was carried out here. The very first well-developed civilization flourished in the Indus valley. There's a lot more for which you'll probably need a lifetime (or maybe two). And all these things took place around 5000BC !!!* *Hope you understated. Thank you*
Do "Bharat" existed before 1950 ? Any proof or reference ? All what you have cited is myth. Before 3000 years existing India was belong to Buddha, not hindu. Read facts please not myths.
@Jared "What should I go more in depth on? " I would try to explain what electrons are in the context of Quantum Field theory, since that's the "right" way of thinking about matter these days. So an electron is a perturbation in a "electron" field (like a photon is a perturbation in an EM field), but what does that mean?
My teacher showed this video to my class, i wondered "Am i the only one that realized the video is made from you or there's other students in my class that knows you?"
This is very ironic that still today we hold the belief that electron's position is not predictable. The true statement should be that the position of electron is predictable but we have no data or technology to observe and predict the same. Actually the electron is bound to rotate around the nucleus to generate the required outer or centrifugal force and at the same time it undergoes the effects due to various electric and magnetic forces acting upon it caused by the motion of nearby electrons. We are not technologically advanced enough to know the static position of all the electrons and their velocity vectors simultaneously, which is must to generate or simulate the position of any electron.
@@FobbitMike, QM is not able to give the real picture, as our brain or intelligence can visualize. No matter how small and fast a particle is, it is obeying every rule of physics, it's position or motion is exactly according to physics and mathematics, but it's speed being close to light and size being so small, we are unable to observe and analyse. Further the motion of electron is under the influence of too many varying forces, because of the other charged particles motion nearby which generates electric and magnetic forces, causing the electron to continually change it's course making wave like motion instead of straight motion . The motion is not random or without a cause, but is so complex that neither we can observe nor we could compute.
@@SWARAJSINGH2008 You are completely mistaken. The normal rules of physics break down at the quantum level. It is exactly as Jared said. We cannot predict exactly where an electron will be. Just the ACT of observing affects the outcome. Sounds freaky but its true.
Before clicking I was like psssh here's another bs physics videos that says atoms are like small solar systems, but you went Quantum with it, Loved it!!
1:56 Not only Greeks, Ancient Indians also proposed this. One example is of Maharishi Kanad. He called small particles anu, and atom paramanu (greatest anu). Now in hindi and sanskrit language, we call a small particle Kana, derived from his name ✨🇮🇳❤️🕉️
using this, there is ~2,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 or about two nonillion hydrogen atoms in a meter^3 block of pure hydrogen (assuming they’re all packed together)
Holy shit, you just removed my confusion about the orbitals and the movement of the electrons in atoms that my high school teacher had put in my mind eight years ago!
if u have been taught in chemistry class a quark is combined to form many particles called hadrons it is the most stable of which are protons and neutrons
I'm the grandson of that very person in whose name this account is named, and I'm from West Bengal, India. I read in Class 10, and just have started to know about the electronic configuration and subshells. When at first I came to know about these, I thought that the shells and subshells are a 2d and flat object. But seeing this video I got a complete and clear concept about how the subshells actually look like. I will be grateful to you and your video. Would be more happy if you create more videos about the electronic configuration and etc. You're a great teacher. Good Night. Shubh Ratri.
Do they stretch out to their orbital limits, refracting around themselves, or to others, to refract around them, all on an invisible string? To a limit, to freeze only to collapse on themselves, only to freeze again? In a contentious straight cycle, spiraling through space in time? Are you saying we live in a one dimensional world of many perspectives; it’s not even a flat earth? I’m a grade 9er. This is too much for me. But awesomely done!
Electron orbitals fill up according to Pauli's exclusion principle, which states that no two electrons could have the same quantum state (principal, azimuthal, and magnetic quantum numbers, as well as quantum spin) and Hund's rule, which states that when electrons fill up orbitals, it must not be coupled with another electron in the same orbital until all the orbitals are filled up with at least one electron.
An interesting thought I've always had about motion. Think of life like pixels, how movement on the screen jumps from one pixel to the next pixel. Now scale down movement in real life to the smallest grid of spacial positioning, so obviously we can move a distance and then break down all the tiny measurements of movements between it and then all of the tiny measurements of movement between the between, but once you get down to the atomic level, whats the tiny measurements of movements between the space of one atom to the adjacent one? How does one move an atoms distance and not be able to further break down the movement with ever more infinitely expanding integers of measurement? At some point don't we just...teleport places? were in this space and then instantly we're in the next, because there is no more space between.
That’s kinda/sorta the idea of planck length. Although I think it’s also important to remember that reality often does not align with our intuition, and that just because something is intellectually satisfying and/or makes intuitive sense doesn’t mean it’s true.
Paradoxes of atomism If it were possible to continue the division of matter indefinitely, I would have thought it more probable that this process could be carried out to infinity (thesis of infinite divisibility, contrary to atomistic antithesis). The problem is that we can not and do not have the colossal force to do this, because we are physically limited, we can only at most split up to a few fractions of sand, because we can not get the pieces too small to be divided again and so on , only the cosmic forces of the universe could make or a God out of infinite power. It results in unsustainable paradoxes and absurdities to defend the thesis of the existence of indivisible material entities / elements, the atoms, as they considered Democritus and Leucippus, a thesis that Aristotle correctly rejected. Why do we have to accept the existence of atoms if experience shows us that all compound bodies are divisible indefinitely to our last tactile-sensitive limits? If all the material elements are breakable into smaller parts, from the softest to the hardest, an iron bar when we hit it kneads and looses small pieces of metal and sparks of fire - energy, revealing its divisibility to us, why then do we have to to accept that atoms (indivisible fragments of matter) exist? This atomistic thesis leads us to the paradox well demonstrated by Anaxagoras and Aristotle, that the parts are greater than the sum of the whole, for the components of the self are indivisible and not eternal. The results are the only and most perfect to be realized in all corpus of corruptible and mortal, which results in the refutation of atomism by reduction to the absurd. Another paradox reveals itself is not a fact of existing atoms but is not necessarily indivisible, it is not necessary to prepare an atom for its existence, for who can be indivisible, the ultimate of existence, eternal, indestructible, immune to all sorts of shocks and destructions. Existing and eternal exist, to probe and to separate the various clusters in concentrated points without space, resulting in an inexistence of cohesion / physical concretion and consequent non-existence of visualizing the bodies and material bodies! In what results in a further logical - qualitative refutation of atomism, by a new reduction to the absurd. And finally, indivisible and eternal atoms unite with other equally indivisible and eternal atoms, through connections made of finite and divisible matter as is our physical - corporeal composition and that of all the animate and inanimate bodies of the world, is an absurd total in this thesis, for where would arise a divisible and finite matter that binds atoms, if these same atoms are all indivisible, eternal and indestructible particles? Of the very primordial atoms that gave birth to the whole universe? But would a finite and divisible matter arising from indivisible and eternal atoms not be an unacceptable corruption of the eternal and indivisible essence of atoms? An indivisible atom that gives rise to a divisible matter would not have to possess the germ of divisibility in its essence, revealing in the truth that it is no atom, but a corruptible and perfectly divisible matter, which would refute the very Democritean thesis of existence of atoms? Do you perceive so much of metaphysical absurdities, paradoxes, and idiosyncrasies that the theory of atoms has borne since over 2600 years ago? In the antithesis to the atomist theory, we can not observe and test the process of division ad infinitum, because obviously we have spatial and physical - temporal limits, but at least it is indirectly based on ordinary experience, being a much more rational and scientific hypothesis than considering the hypothesis of finite divisibility in final and eternal atoms, for we have no example of phenomenon or object observable in experience that is indivisible, indestructible, incorruptible, and eternal, whereas for the philosophical hypothesis of indefinite or infinite divisibility we have the support of a sensory experience that all objects, bodies and physical phenomena are divisible or decomposable into smaller, corruptible and destructible parts!
Jared, you did an outstanding job producing the video as well as the narration. Really well done! Too short though. Now, please tackle a). the nature of light, b). the speed of light, c). the double slit experiment, d). quantum physics..... 😁
I finally understand the uncertainty principle. I always you couldn’t know position and velocity together. Either one or the other but I never knew why. This animation cleared this for me.
My favorite description of an electron and its 'orbit': Electrons are a probability distribution of negative charge density. If you took a snap shot of the electron cloud, and sectioned it in 3d space, each box would have a number associated with the probability of finding a negative charge at that point. The higher the percentages get the denser the negative charge. Until you get to 99.99999 repeating. Youll never find a box with a 100% in it, just a small area where the amount of nines after the decimal tends towards infinity. If you were to fly through this frozen snap shot and take (probability of finding) charge readings, flying towards the densest point youd read something like: 1%, 1%, 3%, 8%, 30%, 80%, 97%, 99%, 99.99999999999999999%. Then as you pass through the densest point, 93%, 78%, 42%, 15%, 2% 1%, 1% 1%, 0.0000001%, etc. Or in other words, friggin weird man.
You should do another episode on orbitals. Maybe a collab with a popular science channel? You have no idea how many college chemistry students would thank you.
Jared Owen definitely one of the harder concepts to materialize into 3D animation. There’s endless potential for science themed animations though. Makes it tough to choose from I bet. Haha
JJ Thompson, Rutherford, Chadwick ,Planck's theory ,Bohr model, Heisenberg, De Broglie, Schrodinger's, Pauli exclusion, Aufbau principle were explained in this. I am studying in class 11th and didnt understand this in school so just checked this video, now i understood it properly
I am a chemist with a master degree in chemistry, and I have to say that this is not something that is easy to understand and explain, so I admire your intelligent and the effort :D
You say ture
I am chemist Indian hii
I am in high school but I got a clear idea about everything from Heisenberg's uncertanity principle,shapes of orbitals,filling of electrons to Schrodinger's atomic model.
sir would u like to make video over orbitals
Yes
Your animation and explanation of a few minutes is better than whole chapters of textbooks and tens of hours of learning and infinite hours of trying to understand this.
Glad to help😁
Where do you study man ??
Probably you don't have reading habit.
Even if you will read it through the book,
You will get it.
🤣
Yup, got some clarity of that concept after watching this
Gud To see some shias on TH-cam ♥️
I Am also Shia Muslim
@@neetaspirants594
You are most welcome
Only legends know that they watched
JJ Thompson, Rutherford, Chadwick ,Bohr, Heisenberg, De Broglie, Schroedinger's theories in just 5 minutes .
Correct!!
Molecular orbital theory as well
So am I a legend?
👍
You missed the boss
Means Planks .....
Ohhh, so that's the reason I failed in chemistry.
😂😂😂
Lmfaooo
Really
I score 95 marks in chemistry
aye, the moles ate holes in my understanding...
Electrons are like camera flashes at a stadium
good fucking analogy
Damn.. it was in fact, a good fucking analogy
there's so many scientists here...
and I'm like an ancient human watching the video only for damn school projects
Btw, it's a helpful video :)
Glad my video is helping Donny! Good luck on the project
Yup, apparently, i didn't knew that scientist revealing who they are are so common on yt. Damn, scientists saying, "I'm a scientist" on every science video.
R you really donny??!!
We can help scientists by processing data from boinc distributed computing software ♥️
I whish my teacher could explain like this when I was in college!
It means it's time ro update our studies.
are you a fool
Even 12th students know more than this video
Are you a old person ?
Very very old person
Jared: “what is the smallest thing you can think of?”
Me: quarks
Fr that’s what I thought
Plank's length or string theory
Person GG man, I don’t think their something smaller than that
AJ Olesen Jared owen : hold my quarks
or the higgs particle
So an electron is just a dvd logo bouncing on your screen.
Underrated comment
So true lmao
No it's the default Windows XP screensaver
An electron is just a dvd logo touching the corner of your monitor. Its unpredictable. 😁
Mine Bomber not really. You think it’s gonna hit the corner, but it never does.
One of the best videos I have discovered to explain in a didactic way the size of an atom
Why are all the TH-camrs that would make great teachers not teachers and we’re stuck with “refer to page [Number] in the Textbook”
Love your content dude
Possibly the simplest most concise explanation of the difference between orbit and orbitals that I've come across. Thanks!
Why not just tell them about Heisenbergs Uncertainity Principle
Tarang Patil If we want to learn how to make meth we will look it up.
Because as he stated, he wanted to keep it simple
That is because, wouldnyou understand any bits of Schrödinger's wave equation on 9th standard? You need to know advanced mathematics like calculus, surds and logs for that.
Sure
@@narendramodicommunistversi4466
It was the reason for the failure of Bhor's atomic model.
This is what Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is all about. Very nicely explained. Thanks.
allaboutchemistry123.blogspot.com/2020/04/atoms-and-molecules-what-are-atoms-and-molecules.html
why heisannberg invent this principle🥺🥺 lead to made chemistry with unlimted studies materials from schools
I thought orbitals and orbits are same.
TH-cam > School
Thanks!
@Jeet Pratap Singh you've written it otherway round.... orbitals are the area where the probability of finding an electron is max..
school teacher: sit down and lemme learn you some science
jared owen: i'm bout to wreck this man's whole career
Im a chemistry teacher i know its actually tough to teach but yiu did it Amazingly. Suplendid
thank you!
Hey Jared, I m a PCM student.
This video was amazing since it allows us to easily visualize about this topic but I have small request here
Can u pls pls pls make another video on this topic covering more topics deeply
It will be really helpful for students......
Pls pls pls
I m requesting this from u coz after watching ur video I came to know that u r the only person who can turn this topic into realistic animation
Sir pls pls pls help
It will be really helpful
I promise that I will be sharing that to all my frns....
There are other TH-cam channels too who cover such science topics very easily and explain them in animated form.
@@Anonymous-kw7ls please tell me some. I will be grateful ☺️
Really I need it too...I'm also a PCM student...🖖🖖🖖 videos like this really make things easier..
@@Sãf4ron5 u can refer to TYLER DEWITT videos for chemistry . He's a great guy
@@Sãf4ron5 I just came here coz of that atomic structure chapter. that's hard 😕
This video is so brilliantly put together! The animation went hand-in-hand with the narration and gave a good perspective on what's bigger and what's smaller; which comes first and whioch comes later? The size and order was aptly explained. Thank you!
😎
Just so I can remember when I watch this...
1 Angstrom=100 Femtometers
Edit: Thanks past me
Lmao
aint got no one but yourself in this world
@@zoraizahmad6536 no.
Smaller than Nanometers there are Picometers. Then there are Femtometers ?
And, quarks are measured in Femtometers, the Nucleus of an atom are known as quarks. Which is possibly the smallest particle the microscopes can see.
So reality is basically vibrating energy.
rawm yaaj ....yip, kinda like our "consciousness"
tonez I think when they say God created us in his image... I think they're talking about consciousness. Seem like consciousness is immaterial, but is the only real thing that truly exist.
lol
Mr. ConcealedCheese
So, are you available to do magic shows for kids?? :-O
Cheers for the Video! Sorry for chiming in, I would love your initial thoughts. Have you tried - Taparton Growing Program Takeover (search on google)? It is a great one off guide for learning how to get a bigger manhood minus the headache. Ive heard some super things about it and my work buddy after a lifetime of fighting got excellent success with it.
1:56 *As a Bharatiya (better known as Indians), it is quiet disappointing for me to see and hear from the world the fact that the Greeks researched everything. The innumerable ideas and inventions and discoveries, from atoms to radios to airplanes as well, originally germinated in this great country, but are now proudly published by others as their own work. When the world didn't even know to speak, Bharat was the only country to have had universities. The most scientific language known to the world, The Holy Sanskrit, originated here. The first successful surgery was carried out here. The very first well-developed civilization flourished in the Indus valley. There's a lot more for which you'll probably need a lifetime (or maybe two). And all these things took place around 5000BC !!!*
*Hope you understated. Thank you*
I know bro how it feels. Actually those damn British are the reason we are so underrated.
Do "Bharat" existed before 1950 ?
Any proof or reference ?
All what you have cited is myth.
Before 3000 years existing India was belong to Buddha, not hindu.
Read facts please not myths.
@@issaaczala5125 😂😂😂
@@issaaczala5125I appreciate your knowledge sir...😂😁😂😂
@@issaaczala5125 Surely from "Foxford University"😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
make it more more complex please
:D y indeed :D
it looked really interesting ^_^
What should I go more in depth on? I plan on making a follow up video in the future. I think orbitals is a topic I'd like to do more of
Jared Owen that would be great and thanks a lot for the reply.
Perhaps break down four quantum numbers.
@Jared "What should I go more in depth on? "
I would try to explain what electrons are in the context of Quantum Field theory, since that's the "right" way of thinking about matter these days. So an electron is a perturbation in a "electron" field (like a photon is a perturbation in an EM field), but what does that mean?
My teacher showed this video to my class, i wondered "Am i the only one that realized the video is made from you or there's other students in my class that knows you?"
Thanks, this helped me visualize chemistry. Thank you 😭😭
Short ... sweet... simple.... and the BEST part is that it's understandable.... I LOVE IT!. thank you
Finally after finding lots of video... Got this masterpiece
"What's the smallest thing you can think of?"
Me: Planck's length.
Group of atoms, seeing a group of atoms on a group of atoms that how small an atom is....!
This is very ironic that still today we hold the belief that electron's position is not predictable. The true statement should be that the position of electron is predictable but we have no data or technology to observe and predict the same.
Actually the electron is bound to rotate around the nucleus to generate the required outer or centrifugal force and at the same time it undergoes the effects due to various electric and magnetic forces acting upon it caused by the motion of nearby electrons. We are not technologically advanced enough to know the static position of all the electrons and their velocity vectors simultaneously, which is must to generate or simulate the position of any electron.
This is not a belief. My friend, you need to study quantum mechanics before making such comments.
@@FobbitMike, QM is not able to give the real picture, as our brain or intelligence can visualize. No matter how small and fast a particle is, it is obeying every rule of physics, it's position or motion is exactly according to physics and mathematics, but it's speed being close to light and size being so small, we are unable to observe and analyse. Further the motion of electron is under the influence of too many varying forces, because of the other charged particles motion nearby which generates electric and magnetic forces, causing the electron to continually change it's course making wave like motion instead of straight motion . The motion is not random or without a cause, but is so complex that neither we can observe nor we could compute.
@@SWARAJSINGH2008
You are completely mistaken. The normal rules of physics break down at the quantum level. It is exactly as Jared said. We cannot predict exactly where an electron will be. Just the ACT of observing affects the outcome. Sounds freaky but its true.
@@SWARAJSINGH2008 but electrons have dual nature
Do flat earthers believe in atoms?
Only if they are flat.
@@Max_Jacoby lmao you killed it
They believe an atom is a cube
Makes me wonder if all the flat-earthers’ wives have flat chests 🤔
They call em Flatoms
Obviously the best video for understanding the concept
Before clicking I was like psssh here's another bs physics videos that says atoms are like small solar systems, but you went Quantum with it, Loved it!!
Thank you!
El'Dar R
You explain better than a whole chapter on an atom.
Best explanation I've ever seen..so easy to understand..well done fellow!
1:56 Not only Greeks, Ancient Indians also proposed this. One example is of Maharishi Kanad. He called small particles anu, and atom paramanu (greatest anu). Now in hindi and sanskrit language, we call a small particle Kana, derived from his name ✨🇮🇳❤️🕉️
WORLD Best Knowledge.
Bestest Vedio.
No comment
This men can explain anything very perfectly
using this, there is ~2,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 or about two nonillion hydrogen atoms in a meter^3 block of pure hydrogen (assuming they’re all packed together)
Orbital is nothing but a solution of TISE of ¹H
The probability density and other stuff are just the application
What if atoms have more dimensions than we have on our scale?
why don't you have more likes?
Quite interesting!
String theory ❤
Wonderful video Jared.
😎
Ångstrom needs the ring above the “A”. Like other languages which use accents, leaving it off is considered a spelling error as the sound is changed.
yeah I probably should have added that in...
Please also make an animated video on 'What happens when atoms of different elements bond together'....
In India we learn this in higher school not in College
ammyhunt yes right from 6th onwards...........
@@devnampriyapriyadarshi1331 bro didn't you read 11th chemistry book it is there in perhaps 2-3 chapter about orbitals and its shape
Correct
And we are thought this in high school not only India siss
Holy shit, you just removed my confusion about the orbitals and the movement of the electrons in atoms that my high school teacher had put in my mind eight years ago!
If a nucleus is made of quarks, then what are quarks made of?
*TOP 10 QUESTIONS SCIENTIST STILL CAN'T ANSWER*
energy
*Thanos*
Quarks are elemental particles
if u have been taught in chemistry class a quark is combined to form many particles called hadrons it is the most stable of which are protons and neutrons
I used to hate my chemistry class way back in college days. Explaining like this would help a lot even now it's helping.
In India we learn this in school instead of college
That most of us never needed to learn
In the school
The only 1 video everyone watch without skipping 👊💥
Jared: Whats the smallest thing you can think of?
Me: Fundamental Particles.
Jared: ...okay then
How about......
*the fabric of space itself?*
I think my male reproductive organ is smaller. There are children that might read this.
I'm the grandson of that very person in whose name this account is named, and I'm from West Bengal, India. I read in Class 10, and just have started to know about the electronic configuration and subshells. When at first I came to know about these, I thought that the shells and subshells are a 2d and flat object. But seeing this video I got a complete and clear concept about how the subshells actually look like. I will be grateful to you and your video.
Would be more happy if you create more videos about the electronic configuration and etc. You're a great teacher.
Good Night.
Shubh Ratri.
I give science class to 6th graders. I taught em something similar. I'm happy to know that my class wasn't that bad! 😅
Good thing youre not an English teacher.....
@@disht2 why?
@@09Rickhunter "I give science class to 6th graders."
I am glad TH-cam recommended me this 5 year old video.
Thanks Jared, this is by far the clearest and simplest explanation of what an atom is like! This is great! Gongratulations!
Entire class 11th second chapter in 5 mins... Wow
Your Animation techniques accelerate the insight of one's mind... Good Job!
Cover class 11 Chemistry 2nd Chapter in 5 minutes without any hypothesis and boring topics - I like this.
Americans: who is meter?
meter is a good guy. I call him Bill.
@@FobbitMike do you know I found that meter is married to litre???😂😂😂😂
@@belashetye3868 and do you know their son centimeter?
@@Greenierw omg yeah I do... he's a really good kid.😂😂😂😂
Latest addition to brood is smaller than the rest.......Micro meter😱
Your animation is amazing. Please make more videos of science, buildings and space
Coming up soon! thanks Saad
Keep it up bro, great video
Do they stretch out to their orbital limits, refracting around themselves, or to others, to refract around them, all on an invisible string? To a limit, to freeze only to collapse on themselves, only to freeze again? In a contentious straight cycle, spiraling through space in time? Are you saying we live in a one dimensional world of many perspectives; it’s not even a flat earth? I’m a grade 9er. This is too much for me. But awesomely done!
It's incredible how you explained something for which teachers take 2-3 hours of classes in 5 minutes.
Must be very very very small pixels to illustrate those atoms
I guess DNA is more popular than RNA
Really good animation for better understanding
What a fantastic description!!!!
Love this.
I hope you to share more chemistry teaching videos.
I’m tellin’ ya, these electrons today. They’re outta CONTROL!
Hahaha
Another great video fella, thanks!
NOTHING BETTER THAN CHEERIOS
Electron orbitals fill up according to Pauli's exclusion principle, which states that no two electrons could have the same quantum state (principal, azimuthal, and magnetic quantum numbers, as well as quantum spin) and Hund's rule, which states that when electrons fill up orbitals, it must not be coupled with another electron in the same orbital until all the orbitals are filled up with at least one electron.
An interesting thought I've always had about motion. Think of life like pixels, how movement on the screen jumps from one pixel to the next pixel. Now scale down movement in real life to the smallest grid of spacial positioning, so obviously we can move a distance and then break down all the tiny measurements of movements between it and then all of the tiny measurements of movement between the between, but once you get down to the atomic level, whats the tiny measurements of movements between the space of one atom to the adjacent one? How does one move an atoms distance and not be able to further break down the movement with ever more infinitely expanding integers of measurement? At some point don't we just...teleport places? were in this space and then instantly we're in the next, because there is no more space between.
That’s kinda/sorta the idea of planck length. Although I think it’s also important to remember that reality often does not align with our intuition, and that just because something is intellectually satisfying and/or makes intuitive sense doesn’t mean it’s true.
Electrons change their way because they release energy and take energy.
Great explanation .
Thank you.😊
Bro you should colab with kurzgesagt
1:56 not ancient Greek but ancient India's philosopher maharshi KANAD proposed that thought.
He actually did after that guy from ancient Greek
Paradoxes of atomism
If it were possible to continue the division of matter indefinitely, I would have thought it more probable that this process could be carried out to infinity (thesis of infinite divisibility, contrary to atomistic antithesis).
The problem is that we can not and do not have the colossal force to do this, because we are physically limited, we can only at most split up to a few fractions of sand, because we can not get the pieces too small to be divided again and so on , only the cosmic forces of the universe could make or a God out of infinite power.
It results in unsustainable paradoxes and absurdities to defend the thesis of the existence of indivisible material entities / elements, the atoms, as they considered Democritus and Leucippus, a thesis that Aristotle correctly rejected.
Why do we have to accept the existence of atoms if experience shows us that all compound bodies are divisible indefinitely to our last tactile-sensitive limits?
If all the material elements are breakable into smaller parts, from the softest to the hardest, an iron bar when we hit it kneads and looses small pieces of metal and sparks of fire - energy, revealing its divisibility to us, why then do we have to to accept that atoms (indivisible fragments of matter) exist?
This atomistic thesis leads us to the paradox well demonstrated by Anaxagoras and Aristotle, that the parts are greater than the sum of the whole, for the components of the self are indivisible and not eternal. The results are the only and most perfect to be realized in all corpus of corruptible and mortal, which results in the refutation of atomism by reduction to the absurd.
Another paradox reveals itself is not a fact of existing atoms but is not necessarily indivisible, it is not necessary to prepare an atom for its existence, for who can be indivisible, the ultimate of existence, eternal, indestructible, immune to all sorts of shocks and destructions. Existing and eternal exist, to probe and to separate the various clusters in concentrated points without space, resulting in an inexistence of cohesion / physical concretion and consequent non-existence of visualizing the bodies and material bodies! In what results in a further logical - qualitative refutation of atomism, by a new reduction to the absurd.
And finally, indivisible and eternal atoms unite with other equally indivisible and eternal atoms, through connections made of finite and divisible matter as is our physical - corporeal composition and that of all the animate and inanimate bodies of the world, is an absurd total in this thesis, for where would arise a divisible and finite matter that binds atoms, if these same atoms are all indivisible, eternal and indestructible particles? Of the very primordial atoms that gave birth to the whole universe? But would a finite and divisible matter arising from indivisible and eternal atoms not be an unacceptable corruption of the eternal and indivisible essence of atoms? An indivisible atom that gives rise to a divisible matter would not have to possess the germ of divisibility in its essence, revealing in the truth that it is no atom, but a corruptible and perfectly divisible matter, which would refute the very Democritean thesis of existence of atoms?
Do you perceive so much of metaphysical absurdities, paradoxes, and idiosyncrasies that the theory of atoms has borne since over 2600 years ago?
In the antithesis to the atomist theory, we can not observe and test the process of division ad infinitum, because obviously we have spatial and physical - temporal limits, but at least it is indirectly based on ordinary experience, being a much more rational and scientific hypothesis than considering the hypothesis of finite divisibility in final and eternal atoms, for we have no example of phenomenon or object observable in experience that is indivisible, indestructible, incorruptible, and eternal, whereas for the philosophical hypothesis of indefinite or infinite divisibility we have the support of a sensory experience that all objects, bodies and physical phenomena are divisible or decomposable into smaller, corruptible and destructible parts!
what
This comment is too much for my brain
Hello Mr. Jared Owens....!
Very good explanation. I liked it very much. Very Simple language. Easy to understand.
Thanks Amit! Glad you liked it
Atomic structure in 5 mins 😂😂😂
allaboutchemistry123.blogspot.com/2020/04/atoms-and-molecules-what-are-atoms-and-molecules.html
A great video with epic background music!
Your channel is lit
You deserve more attention
Jared, you did an outstanding job producing the video as well as the narration. Really well done! Too short though. Now, please tackle a). the nature of light, b). the speed of light, c). the double slit experiment, d). quantum physics..... 😁
Thanks Roberto - I will do more videos like this in the future!
0:34 MY DING DONG
LMAO 😭
I finally understand the uncertainty principle. I always you couldn’t know position and velocity together. Either one or the other but I never knew why. This animation cleared this for me.
Glad to help Alex!
explain it in terms of quantum mechanics
I also had difficulty in understanding orbit and orbitals that how that is possible for electron to orbit nucleus but this man is great teacher.
1:03 virus has RNA 🤣🤣🤣
Every living thing has dna
@ice0817 that is true but first of all viruses are technically not alive and 2nd a virus has RNA not DNA and please don't spam this emoji -----> 🤓
1:22 somebody give that nervous clarinet player a tranquilizer shot! 😉
My favorite description of an electron and its 'orbit': Electrons are a probability distribution of negative charge density.
If you took a snap shot of the electron cloud, and sectioned it in 3d space, each box would have a number associated with the probability of finding a negative charge at that point. The higher the percentages get the denser the negative charge. Until you get to 99.99999 repeating. Youll never find a box with a 100% in it, just a small area where the amount of nines after the decimal tends towards infinity.
If you were to fly through this frozen snap shot and take (probability of finding) charge readings, flying towards the densest point youd read something like: 1%, 1%, 3%, 8%, 30%, 80%, 97%, 99%, 99.99999999999999999%. Then as you pass through the densest point, 93%, 78%, 42%, 15%, 2% 1%, 1% 1%, 0.0000001%, etc.
Or in other words, friggin weird man.
good ..thanks..it took me 50 years to understand this ...my teachers were bullshit..great teaching..keep up the good work.
😀
your explanation is the best . keep it going
Thanks for your animation I was not getting idea for orbital thanks for it
0:13
Jared owen: that's the smallest thing you can think of?
Everyone: quark
Me, an intellectual: plank particle
Hey what is plank particle
Super video!
The music is incredibly distracting. I'd like to see in future a way to disable background audio tracks to satisfy all viewers.
Finally, a clear and precise explanation!
I have never seen such video with that much clear understanding
Thank you so much sir
You are most welcome!
Will You make a Video on How a Hydraulic Pump Works?
I wish I have learn this since I was in Chemistry class, keep blowing it Jared...
Jeez the visuals on this is so good.
Just watching all your stuff at 3 going on 4 am until my battery dies. Good shit all around
You should do another episode on orbitals. Maybe a collab with a popular science channel? You have no idea how many college chemistry students would thank you.
I've definitely thought about it doing another one on orbitals - my college text book didn't do a very good job of explaining it
Jared Owen definitely one of the harder concepts to materialize into 3D animation. There’s endless potential for science themed animations though. Makes it tough to choose from I bet. Haha
JJ Thompson, Rutherford, Chadwick ,Planck's theory ,Bohr model, Heisenberg, De Broglie, Schrodinger's, Pauli exclusion, Aufbau principle were explained in this. I am studying in class 11th and didnt understand this in school so just checked this video, now i understood it properly