What happened to the Hindenburg?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 8K

  • @JaredOwen
    @JaredOwen  5 ปีที่แล้ว +3833

    This took a long time to animate - I hope it was fun to watch!
    Check out the blog post about this video:
    www.patreon.com/posts/26931564

    • @Vedanth01
      @Vedanth01 5 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      Amazing video.

    • @Vedanth01
      @Vedanth01 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Please make video about RAT (Ram Air Turbine)

    • @mistertree553
      @mistertree553 5 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      Jared Owen this was beautifully animated with plenty of great details in both the animation and information provided. Bravo!

    • @thetomgamerboi6817
      @thetomgamerboi6817 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Note: because of a unrecommended sharp turn, a wire snapped and severed a gas bag and the mooring lines created a static spark.

    • @slimeking101
      @slimeking101 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      What about the Saturn 5 was it bigger than that?

  • @BigMacOrange
    @BigMacOrange 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16856

    The balls to have a smoking room on this thing is impressive.

    • @f0nk3m0n
      @f0nk3m0n 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1175

      ikr ??? smoking on planes was also super common, and it wasn't officially banned in the united states until (my jaw dropped when I googled this) February 25th 1990. the fucking 90's bro. I'm in utter disbelief. People are so dumb omg.

    • @f0nk3m0n
      @f0nk3m0n 4 ปีที่แล้ว +797

      OMG smoking on planes in the EU was banned in 1997 how are we not extinct

    • @danielamspaugh7519
      @danielamspaugh7519 4 ปีที่แล้ว +158

      @@f0nk3m0n No way! That is crazy.

    • @brockwallace4661
      @brockwallace4661 4 ปีที่แล้ว +324

      I flew to Germany in 95 and smoked on the plane.

    • @user-lf3wr8rh7r
      @user-lf3wr8rh7r 4 ปีที่แล้ว +636

      I think they were referring to it being filled with a flammable gas, rather than than the comfort of non smokers!

  • @Dodo-nb3yc
    @Dodo-nb3yc 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3273

    never realised there was actually this much inside of an airship, thought it was just the control room hanging from the bottom

    • @Cosford869
      @Cosford869 3 ปีที่แล้ว +95

      I thought the same.

    • @aleph_zero1
      @aleph_zero1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      Same

    • @Zelurpio
      @Zelurpio 3 ปีที่แล้ว +82

      As a kid I thought the envelope was all filled with hydrogen and all the rooms were pressurized. I was like 6. I always liked to give ideas on how things worked, I was a smart lad.

    • @sheilaolfieway1885
      @sheilaolfieway1885 3 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      that's a blimp in a zepplin the control room is built mostly into the structure because it's rigid where in a blimp it's not rigid ,but a balloon

    • @reentrysfs6317
      @reentrysfs6317 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      @@Zelurpio quit your bullshit

  • @oreosauce5776
    @oreosauce5776 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6894

    *Germany should have used ExpressVPN to get Helium*

    • @alex0589
      @alex0589 5 ปีที่แล้ว +145

      Oreo Sauce -suspicious amounts of online orders for helium coming from *checks notes* lincoln, nebraska, sir
      -checks out, send it

    • @santiagoperez2094
      @santiagoperez2094 5 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@AngelLestat2 ehh no, with helium the number of customers would be reduced but still would be rentable. maybe you are assuming that it would not be able to cross based in usa investigations and copy attempts, but these where a total failure and coudlnt even survive cross wind. also, von zeppelin was totally against nazi germany, but he had to get that swastika on his precious bird because usa didnt want to send HIM helium, this was because germany was the only country capable of cross the atlantic, not only passangers, but also with mail service, so it was a commercial block, nothing to do with nazi germany, that, before the war, was a potential ally to usa.

    • @AngelLestat2
      @AngelLestat2 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@santiagoperez2094 I dont get your point. To fully understand mine I recommend you to read my answer on quora.
      When I said that if the hindenburg would not be able to keep the range it had even with zero payload (no cabins, no passengers, no bed, nothing), I am just taking into account common sense in airships operation.
      All the lift that is lost due 12% less buoyancy, plus the lift lost due to start with lower inflation because you can not vent helium because is expensive, not being able to counter all the weight lost of the fuel mass consumed meanwhile you are in travel or inject hydrogen into the engines to extend range and other helium drawbacks.
      Is not just a matter that "it would not be so rentable", it can not cross the ocean so it would not be rentable at all unless it would be used just for short range trips, but what is the point to travel on land? for that you used a car or something similar.
      At those times the benefic was the speed of airships vs ships.
      About cross winds not sure what you mean, Zeppelings (from the zeppeling brand), had a lot of experience and they was well constructed (mostly due the extra buoyancy margin you get with hydrogen that can be used for reinforcements), they were in many storms and no passenger die.

    • @santiagoperez2094
      @santiagoperez2094 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      it isnt a plane, it doesnt consume fuel to generate lift. it didnt got in any storm, in fact its perfect score was also there thnx to its tripulants, search about them

    • @AngelLestat2
      @AngelLestat2 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ​@@santiagoperez2094 I know everything about them.. they consume fuel to move... unless you are considering to be super lucky to have the wind with the direction and intensity to where you want to go :P
      They were in many storms.. some lighting hit on them (I am speaking of the last models of zeppelins) and they were ok.
      If you are gonna to discuss, try to make it with facts. Don't make me lose my time with internet trolling.
      I read several books over airships in different languages.

  • @maggiepettit4020
    @maggiepettit4020 ปีที่แล้ว +175

    My Great grandma is currently 93 and as I'm typing this, is alive. She was born in 1930 in Lakehurst NJ and was 9 at the time of the explosion her father was a crew member that was going to get the ship safely down. Fortunately he survived. My Great Grandma also watched the hidenburg come down. She was watching not too far at a nearby fence.

    • @ramdas363
      @ramdas363 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      My great great cousin was the mail room on board. Said people sent each other a lot of naughty messages from the air.

    • @matthewmik9
      @matthewmik9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      how can you be 9 after 7 years until the explosion

    • @aditsaini5094
      @aditsaini5094 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      ​@@ramdas363lmao humans never chamnge

    • @Copper_snipezz
      @Copper_snipezz 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@ramdas363he was the entire mail room?!?!( srry had to make that joke)

    • @mikey73
      @mikey73 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Copper_snipezz that's impressive

  • @thatmnkid2372
    @thatmnkid2372 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2655

    These are the type of videos I watch at 2AM after i told myself I was going to bed at 12

  • @Melan_B
    @Melan_B 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2921

    Not gonna lie, the air ships seem really cool

    • @akromimubarok6626
      @akromimubarok6626 3 ปีที่แล้ว +189

      If someone will ever rebuild this airship with the same size or even bigger, i would like to pay a million to have a wedding party there. Traveling the world with your love one, its just like sailing but in the sky.

    • @cclapew
      @cclapew 3 ปีที่แล้ว +69

      There are new airships that are being planned to be built.... the new luxury cruise ships of the sky

    • @akromimubarok6626
      @akromimubarok6626 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      @@cclapew is this real? If it cost around 500k to 1,5 million usd to get everything i need. Definitely i will spend my money on it

    • @knoxmarsh0105
      @knoxmarsh0105 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Uuuuuuuntil they catch fire

    • @coniston3106
      @coniston3106 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      @@akromimubarok6626 And no rush. Aircrafts nowadays travel for hours, which is too short to spend some time. Airship is one cool thing, but just to make sure it doesn't burn 😂.

  • @mattpope1746
    @mattpope1746 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    I’ve always been fascinated with the Hindenburg disaster so it is great to see the workings of the ship in such detail. Thanks for all the hard work that obviously went into this!

  • @MikMoen
    @MikMoen 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2920

    Make the entire ship a giant flammable balloon.
    "Lets give everyone a place to smoke."

    • @EASPORTSE775
      @EASPORTSE775 3 ปีที่แล้ว +71

      Oh yeah guys let's light a camp fire it will be fun!

    • @potatofuryy
      @potatofuryy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +49

      @@EASPORTSE775 *it wasn’t fun*

    • @TheDragonGamer25
      @TheDragonGamer25 3 ปีที่แล้ว +59

      Ah yes I have an urge to smoke inside the giant hydrogen baloon

    • @watchm4ker
      @watchm4ker 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      Really? You're complaining about a smoking room, but cooked meals are fine and dandy?

    • @TheDragonGamer25
      @TheDragonGamer25 2 ปีที่แล้ว +49

      @@watchm4ker Make the entire ship a giant flammable balloon.
      "Lets give everyone a place to cook."

  • @D-Man_Jam
    @D-Man_Jam 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2249

    _"More than half the people survived"_
    Bruh, how. It was literally just a ball of fire.

    • @ianseldoon1197
      @ianseldoon1197 4 ปีที่แล้ว +381

      "Since they're about to land, most passengers are already at the windows-"

    • @D-Man_Jam
      @D-Man_Jam 4 ปีที่แล้ว +49

      @@ianseldoon1197 yeah, I just watched the Mustard video on it.

    • @noellepatton8901
      @noellepatton8901 4 ปีที่แล้ว +183

      Hydrogen fires mostly explode upward vs other fuel source explosions which explode outwardly in all directions.

    • @Helperbot-2000
      @Helperbot-2000 4 ปีที่แล้ว +73

      @@noellepatton8901 that and the pasenger area was on the bottom of the ship

    • @ZC.Andrew
      @ZC.Andrew 4 ปีที่แล้ว +187

      Many of them survived with broken limbs after jumping. The longer they waited to jump, the lower their fall - but the more likely the airship's fiery form would land atop them. Timing was rather crucial.

  • @NZREngine
    @NZREngine 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2100

    It's weird that these giant airships were being designed before the tiny modern bike was even invented

    • @TheGrandHistorians
      @TheGrandHistorians 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      NZREngine bike was invented 700 years ago go watch praveen mohan channel also vimanas or ufos were made 7,000 years ago. go pay your due dilligence.

    • @w4drone720
      @w4drone720 4 ปีที่แล้ว +217

      @@TheGrandHistorians He means modern bikes, not like Charlie Chaplin looking crap, but i see what you mean

    • @8-bitanimates989
      @8-bitanimates989 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      The Grand Historian *modern*

    • @SandeepKumar-mq8cy
      @SandeepKumar-mq8cy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Man because of you they insult us

    • @ElectricChaplain
      @ElectricChaplain 4 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      @@TheGrandHistorians UFOs wtf. Myths are not historical evidence.
      More like "the grand crackpot"

  • @LupeCoded
    @LupeCoded ปีที่แล้ว +46

    The reason the fire started from the back was because the captain was pushing the Airship to its limits. That caused one of the control cables to snap and puncture the body of the airship. This combined with the static electricity phenomenon described in this video is what led to the spark that ignited the Hindenburg.

    • @davidwuhrer6704
      @davidwuhrer6704 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No, the static electricity built up between a hydrogen vent flap and the hull. Venting hydrogen was part of the docking procedure, but there was not supposed to be any static electricity. Someone must have used unsafe paint.

    • @ThatGreyGentleman
      @ThatGreyGentleman 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@davidwuhrer6704you almost got it. It was the weather conditions, as well as the cross-Atlantic flight, that made the whole surface damp with salt water. Built up a huge charge. PBS Nova explains the whole thing

    • @davidwuhrer6704
      @davidwuhrer6704 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@ThatGreyGentleman A charge compared to the ground was expected. There had been hundreds of crossings across the Atlantic before, and none of them ignited vented hydrogen. The issue in question is the charge between the flap and the hull, both of which had been exposed to the same weather conditions simultaneously.
      Go back to school.

    • @denniskrenz2080
      @denniskrenz2080 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

      That is a good possibility, but the theory has its errors and thats part of the mystery. The ship was already heavy in the rear (lost more hydrogen there than further forward) and had to drop more aft ballast than usual before the radical maneuvers for the urgent landing took place. So the damage must already have happened while the ship was flying over the USA and waited for the thunderstorms to pass. None of the witnesses mentioned any hard maneuvers before and also the captain was not handling the wheel, as usual (since the bridge crew operated on their own without many commands by the captain during a landing). But a snapped tensioner cable is the most likely culprit anyway. This had happened before, since these piano wires actually made the aircraft rigid and are under heavy stress during turbulence and maneuvers.

    • @denniskrenz2080
      @denniskrenz2080 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@davidwuhrer6704 The hydrogen, that gets vented controlled or from overpressure valves also goes into the vent shafts and not into the hull itself. This venting is actually even a safety measure, since the venting ensured that the gas cells only contain hydrogen and no oxygen needed for a combustion. But some amount of leakage happened anyway, a zeppelin needs some airflow through its hull all the time to remove the hydrogen gathering at the top. The slower the airship travels, the harder it gets to remove all the leaked hydrogen from its hull.

  • @cactusjack2264
    @cactusjack2264 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1277

    It’s amazing anyone even survived this, let alone 62 out of the 97 passengers survived. Incredible… 🤯😳

    • @samtheking5759
      @samtheking5759 3 ปีที่แล้ว +62

      (All of the passengers were nazıs)

    • @arigenix
      @arigenix 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      @@samtheking5759 lmao

    • @OhNotThat
      @OhNotThat 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      inb4 "the hidenberg disaster wasn't so bad, most people survived it" xD

    • @haifutter4166
      @haifutter4166 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Makes me wonder, if we could make the hazards irrelevant when constructing an explosion and fire proof passenger cabin with todays materials (aerogel-coat for fireproofing, carbon fibre for the walls etc.) and adding sensors and other preventive measures. A few autonomous cargo airships are currently in operation, but I think airships have a so bad image, that they wont be re-adopted for passenger transport anytime soon. And helium is not future proof because of rising prices due to it's supply being limited.

    • @kimgkomg
      @kimgkomg 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@haifutter4166 I think people would much rather take a plane just because it's way faster

  • @davidt01
    @davidt01 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1143

    "Unfortunately, most of the evidence was burned up."
    You don't say.

  • @felixcat9318
    @felixcat9318 2 ปีที่แล้ว +467

    I recall that a member of the Crew was trapped by the conflagration and had resigned himself to dying, when he was suddenly drenched by a veritable waterfall that came from a water ballast tank above him which fractured!
    The flames around him were extinguished and so he was able to safely escape!
    When I first read about his escape I was really happy for him, and how from facing a truly horrific death he was suddenly saved by a freak occurrence of the only possible means for his survival.
    Your videos are fascinating in their meticulous detail, likewise your narration.

    • @tomt373
      @tomt373 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Meantime, when hydrogen burns, it combines with oxygen, producing H2O, water.

    • @cinquine1
      @cinquine1 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      @@tomt373 Well, steam. Not nearly as helpful

    • @Rexbraiku
      @Rexbraiku ปีที่แล้ว

      and he lived to tell u this ?

    • @101Volts
      @101Volts ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@Rexbraiku It's easily read about. No one's saying "he told me this while we ate doritos lol"

    • @Ra_Q
      @Ra_Q ปีที่แล้ว +6

      When God says live, you WILL live❤️🙌

  • @jo2ed
    @jo2ed ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Wow, incredible video with the animation. It is exactly what I was looking to understand. I visited a museum that presented the Hindenburg and I had no idea there were passengers in it.
    Thank you very much for sharing and keeping this video up!

  • @destkiller100
    @destkiller100 ปีที่แล้ว +706

    My grandfather was a german teen when he served on the Hindenburg as the accident happened but somehow he managed to survive the tragedy. After that he wrote a 1 of 1 book which afterwards he handed over to us about it with a lot pictures and explainings whose describe how he could survive. Truly heartbreaking and devastating. Unfortunately he died 2014 as last survivor of the Hindeburg. If you guys are interested in the book I could share some pictures, but beware, everything is written in german for those who don't understand !

    • @damsbaug33
      @damsbaug33 ปีที่แล้ว +72

      A quick Google search says the last survivor died in 2019. Werner G. Doehner - and he was only 8 at the time of the accident.

    • @lecuz5400
      @lecuz5400 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I would love to see the book what's your Instagram?

    • @destkiller100
      @destkiller100 ปีที่แล้ว +177

      @@damsbaug33 My fault. Werner Doehner was the last surviving passenger. My grandfather who died back in 2014 was the last surving crew member of the Hindenburg.

    • @destkiller100
      @destkiller100 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@lecuz5400 Sure ! sthweirdhppnd

    • @joebidenofficialpotus
      @joebidenofficialpotus ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Werner Franz?

  • @alyssanguyen9704
    @alyssanguyen9704 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3042

    Another episode of where quarantine has gotten me

  • @ZitMaGaming
    @ZitMaGaming 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2942

    Titanic: I'm cold.
    Hindenburg: I'm hot.
    edit: wow 3000 likes this is my most liked comment!

    • @nc8676
      @nc8676 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      😂👍

    • @redrealite
      @redrealite 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      LMFAO

    • @kellerweskier7214
      @kellerweskier7214 4 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      put them together you get ... titan-icburge. ... one letter away and its a bad day.

    • @Enzi_Meteori_902
      @Enzi_Meteori_902 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Speaking of Titanic, He should do an animation about Titanic!

    • @HomieNukeMarkRealNoFake
      @HomieNukeMarkRealNoFake 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      It's so true XD

  • @_HMCB_
    @_HMCB_ ปีที่แล้ว +2

    First time visitor and not the last of my visits. Amazing graphic work. You’ve earned a new subscriber.

  • @than217
    @than217 ปีที่แล้ว +183

    2/3rd of the passengers surviving a 1 minute crash has always been the most astonishing part to me. Those people were booking it.

    • @Daniela-Christianson
      @Daniela-Christianson 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I was today's years old when I learned there even WERE survivors

  • @potempkey-z3h
    @potempkey-z3h 4 ปีที่แล้ว +231

    Flying over brazil in this thing would've been the coolest thing ever

    • @CarlosAM1
      @CarlosAM1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Zulul

    • @aaravrapelli4401
      @aaravrapelli4401 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Your 66 th like

    • @MistuhKayTrains
      @MistuhKayTrains 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      YOU’RE GOING TO BRAZIL 🇧🇷

    • @reza7xz307
      @reza7xz307 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah it’s cool until the landing

    • @juttaweise
      @juttaweise 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      actually the Hindenburg made a round the world trip and yes Brazil too. There are photos that had been
      taken over Rio, visible at the Zeppelin Museum in Zeppelinheim near Frankfurt. Actually a village which
      was created just for all the employees at the Zeppelin company, as it was just at almost waking distance
      of the airport. You can look at it on google maps.

  • @jeanapp_
    @jeanapp_ 5 ปีที่แล้ว +188

    Crisp and clear animation to show how the layout of the thing is. I'm an aircraft design engineer and it's definitely interesting to see how they designed this.
    Thank you for the fantastic explanation!

    • @JaredOwen
      @JaredOwen  5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      😁

    • @DavidSmith-ss1cg
      @DavidSmith-ss1cg 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Great, easy-to-understand images in this superb video, I agree that your work of the illustrators art shows the interior really well.
      You do great work, I have subscribed in a second. I am looking forward to seeing more of your videos.

  • @A2D4
    @A2D4 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have always wondered what it looked like inside. Your video is the first time that has been illustrated (that I’ve ever seen anyway) & it is EXCELLENT. Thank you so much for your work and talent! 👍🏻

  • @walnuthillfarms7579
    @walnuthillfarms7579 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1987

    I didn't know the Nazis used Minecraft Beds

    • @gamertequan7799
      @gamertequan7799 4 ปีที่แล้ว +51

      They did its it crazy

    • @ferreisd71
      @ferreisd71 4 ปีที่แล้ว +62

      Well. Nazis are red and Minecraft beds are red so.

    • @gamertequan7799
      @gamertequan7799 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Ferrei SD it’s it crazy I think they did it crazy it’s

    • @luisarturo3860
      @luisarturo3860 4 ปีที่แล้ว +66

      *Meinkraft

    • @zfloyd1627
      @zfloyd1627 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @@ferreisd71 mojang is Nazi. *CONFIRMED* .

  • @deboditray5834
    @deboditray5834 3 ปีที่แล้ว +138

    Germany, however had a flawless record so far
    Hindenburg : I'mma bout' to destroy this nation's reputation .

    • @EarMaster55
      @EarMaster55 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      To be fair the first accident in the list LZ-104 was a German airship, built by Zeppelin, but it was a military vessel so technically no "passengers" were killed. It is also unclear why LZ-104 exploded as it happened over water and there were no survivors.

    • @deboditray5834
      @deboditray5834 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@EarMaster55 thanks fir the info

    • @2ndplatooncmdrofUSNAVYSEAL
      @2ndplatooncmdrofUSNAVYSEAL 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's stupid.

    • @hurricanemeridian8712
      @hurricanemeridian8712 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@2ndplatooncmdrofUSNAVYSEAL Because?

    • @tat4kingglassrat549
      @tat4kingglassrat549 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      world war II also did it but worse

  • @andreibaciu7518
    @andreibaciu7518 2 ปีที่แล้ว +873

    Having a smoking room on a ship full of hydrogen has the same energy as not having enough life boats because you think your ship is unsinkable

    • @rock3tcatU233
      @rock3tcatU233 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      The hydrogen wasn't the main cause of the accident, instead the aluminium powder laced cellulose skin caused the initial fire.

    • @productions4452
      @productions4452 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Not really because it was pressurised, completely safe, and there was a single electric lighter used by the steward to light up the cigars, cigarettes, or pipes of the passengers. You couldnt bring your own lighter aboard or anything that could be considered dangerous.

    • @willknight13
      @willknight13 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      The titanic not having enough lifeboats is a common misconception and actually had /more/ lifeboats than the recommended amount

    • @RobertCraft-re5sf
      @RobertCraft-re5sf ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@willknight13 Yeah the thinking at the time was the liveboats would be used for multiple trips between a nearby rescue ship

    • @RobertCraft-re5sf
      @RobertCraft-re5sf ปีที่แล้ว +4

      It was a beautiful airship and operated safely for years. Still the largest flying object ever built.

  • @DD0ULQTC
    @DD0ULQTC 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Danke für dieses Video. Was oft missverstanden wird: Ja, Helium ist schwerer als Wasserstoff. Wenn wir das vergleichen müssen wir das Gewicht aber gegen Luft (28,949 g/mol) vergleichen. Und dann wirkt Helium (4.003 g/mol) nicht mehr soooo viel schwerer als Wasserstoff (2,01588 g/mol).

  • @eadecamp
    @eadecamp 4 ปีที่แล้ว +192

    My mother was 11 at the time. She said people could see the smoke 80 miles away in Bergenfield.

    • @lawrencehortizuela4978
      @lawrencehortizuela4978 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Wow

    • @robloxpathe9296
      @robloxpathe9296 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wow

    • @amythomas1124
      @amythomas1124 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Aimee Ward My Mother was inside her Mother at the time of the disaster. My Mom wasn’t born till December 1937.

    • @dusanristic9478
      @dusanristic9478 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Amy Thomas lets find out who the f%uck asked

    • @amythomas1124
      @amythomas1124 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Dusan Ristic oh such a potty mouth!

  • @NerdyPapayaRoblox
    @NerdyPapayaRoblox 3 ปีที่แล้ว +412

    Hydrogen: Extremely flammable
    Engineers: Hey! Let's add a smoking room, too!

    • @remi_gio
      @remi_gio 3 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      ..you are poorly informed on the subject. Room was pressurised exactly because of that. In those days nobody would travel on that airship without being able to smoke. And again this was not the cause of the disaster. 🤦🏻‍♂️

    • @remi_gio
      @remi_gio 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @Diego Jimenez ..not as dumb as your idiotic comment! Have you ever designed anything in your life? Maybe the arrangement of condiments on your sandwich! 😂🤦🏻‍♂️

    • @CupidFromKentucky
      @CupidFromKentucky 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      If the room wasn't there, people would still have smoked. This gave them a safe place to do it.

    • @trainwreckgaming1120
      @trainwreckgaming1120 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      *adds smoking room*
      “ah yes, fire and hydrogen mix very well, nien?”

    • @Bananappleboy
      @Bananappleboy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      People really have to be rude these days.

  • @hem89180
    @hem89180 5 ปีที่แล้ว +685

    OMG, you make the greatest animations of the internet!

    • @JaredOwen
      @JaredOwen  5 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      Thanks Hugo😁

    • @alex0589
      @alex0589 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      For real.

    • @gogo8965
      @gogo8965 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      your sample size is small, very very small

    • @mikebather6688
      @mikebather6688 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      GYANDEEP SINGH (B15EE014) indian

    • @rottree
      @rottree 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Couldn't agree with you more!

  • @ДмитрийГерасимов-ч8ю
    @ДмитрийГерасимов-ч8ю 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Судя по последним исследованиям, всему виной обшивка гинденбурга, состоявшая из целюлозы и алюминиевой пудры, по сути, ракетным топливом, хватило малейшей искры, чтобы обшивка вспыхнула, а дальше в дело вступил водород...

  • @muhammadhadiansari2319
    @muhammadhadiansari2319 4 ปีที่แล้ว +396

    There should be a movie of this disaster like titanic

    • @Comando115
      @Comando115 4 ปีที่แล้ว +83

      for only 1 minute of disaster? nah thanks

    • @RegahP
      @RegahP 4 ปีที่แล้ว +54

      yeah dude that movie would last like 10 minutes max

    • @TurtlesWithAutism
      @TurtlesWithAutism 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      that's dumb

    • @p_filippouz
      @p_filippouz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      For something that lasted like 50 seconds is an animation, not a film.
      And it is even a waste of resources.
      I mean, we have the original footage! Which is slot better!

    • @Boozebedrunk
      @Boozebedrunk 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      It was called Indiana Jones and last crusade

  • @reeceayres2741
    @reeceayres2741 4 ปีที่แล้ว +629

    That's crazy how 100 years later with all the tech we have now, that this still trumps the size of any modern aircraft today

    • @TreniFS_
      @TreniFS_ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +120

      Consider that the majority of the volume was just for the gas: most airliners can carry the same amount of passengers

    • @J.Wolf90
      @J.Wolf90 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Crazy how we've had flying carriages (cars) called airplanes for over 100 years and people still ask why we don't have flying cars yet. Smh

    • @sasasa1541
      @sasasa1541 3 ปีที่แล้ว +65

      @@J.Wolf90 we do, they just suck. There’s no demand for flying cars and I’m pretty glad we don’t have any. There are 102 major car accidents per day in the USA; flight accidents are much more lethal and destructive. Imagine if you had a country where the vehicles combined the accessibility of cars with the power of flying vehicles. We’d need extensive testing, much more than our current driving tests, to let people own them, and anyone who wants to might as well skip the fantasy and buy a Cessna or something.

    • @J.Wolf90
      @J.Wolf90 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      @@sasasa1541 yeah if you really want a flying car just get your pilots license and buy an airplane. the airplane IS the flying car. People want something that they can park in their garage but that will never happen. There are too many safety hazards and restrictions on aircraft's that you're better off just buying a normal plane. But anyways flying cars really are just airplanes

    • @Malamockq
      @Malamockq 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@kuckoo9036 Dude, it's 1930s technology. Hybrid airships potentially can carry a lot more. Concepts for large hybrid airships can carry 1000 tons of cargo.

  • @AbandonedMines11
    @AbandonedMines11 5 ปีที่แล้ว +309

    Great video! Loved the animations. Very clear and easy to understand.

  • @BlueEyed888
    @BlueEyed888 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video and much more informative than any other videos I’ve seen published. Nice computer rendering of the interior layout of the ship, never seen that before.

  • @sanchezking6188
    @sanchezking6188 4 ปีที่แล้ว +342

    Imagine being the poor dude who had to tell the Fuhrer about the loss of his prized airship :/

    • @katekatey279
      @katekatey279 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      🥺

    • @John-iu8cv
      @John-iu8cv 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Prolly got shot out of anger ya know

    • @kkhagerty6315
      @kkhagerty6315 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Sanchez King Fegelein did it

    • @neves3375
      @neves3375 4 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      "Hello?"
      "Hindenburg is ded"
      "no"

    • @kkhagerty6315
      @kkhagerty6315 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Okuyasu Nijimura whre wer u wen Hindenburg diye

  • @emuliusv
    @emuliusv 5 ปีที่แล้ว +520

    Would probably feel like a badass running out of a massive burning wreck.

    • @alex0589
      @alex0589 5 ปีที่แล้ว +90

      Emuli V nothing as badass as running for your life after leaving your loved ones to die horribly

    • @rews3873
      @rews3873 5 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      @@alex0589 running with broken legs

    • @hamstsorkxxor
      @hamstsorkxxor 5 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      And dying anyway, due to radiant heat giving you 3rd degree burns on your back and neck.

    • @DavidSmith-ss1cg
      @DavidSmith-ss1cg 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      After you kick them smelly clumps out of the ends of your pants legs and wipe yourself, yeah.

    • @timedrifter117
      @timedrifter117 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Oh yeah lol your sick

  • @eggyfried1364
    @eggyfried1364 3 ปีที่แล้ว +626

    Is no one going to talk about the amazing animating?

    • @Spritecar69420
      @Spritecar69420 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I can do that but not with that platform bcuz EXPENSIVE PC REQUIRED

    • @BrendanPJames
      @BrendanPJames 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Um people are talking about it. Miss me with your stupid comment

    • @sik59rt
      @sik59rt 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      New to the channel?

    • @AtulKumar-od4es
      @AtulKumar-od4es 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I am new channel

    • @AtulKumar-od4es
      @AtulKumar-od4es 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I am new to this channel

  • @jaybodner4189
    @jaybodner4189 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Really great documentary...thank you!!

  • @tomholland3310
    @tomholland3310 4 ปีที่แล้ว +337

    I would so have an anxiety attack just from a guy lighting a cig in the
    blimp

    • @starthelotus3453
      @starthelotus3453 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Not even a blimp

    • @ZC.Andrew
      @ZC.Andrew 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Me too, but they did have very strict regulations in the smoking room.... they were very aware of the danger.

    • @buckhorncortez
      @buckhorncortez 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It's not a blimp. Blimps don't have an airframe. That's why it's called a dirigible, it has an internal, structural frame.

    • @ZC.Andrew
      @ZC.Andrew 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@buckhorncortez Fair enough!

  • @kipptt
    @kipptt 4 ปีที่แล้ว +573

    other countries: hydrogen filled airships are dangerous.
    germany: uhm yeah no

    • @alexmudkip5974
      @alexmudkip5974 4 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      Well, America didn't want to give helium to Germany.

    • @johnw2026
      @johnw2026 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@alexmudkip5974 Probably because every time Hitler started hollering, his voice pitch went up like he was breathing the stuff on a regular basis. 😁

    • @blackisblack22
      @blackisblack22 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      kippt USA also: let’s c * zap! *

    • @TheGrandHistorians
      @TheGrandHistorians 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      the americans shot it down thats what really happened

    • @maxmustermann4149
      @maxmustermann4149 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@johnw2026 Nah, the Western countries didn't really like Germany even before Hitler's government (NSDAP/DNVP coalition) was elected in 1933.

  • @stickyfox
    @stickyfox ปีที่แล้ว +89

    I grew up in Ocean County and it has always amazed me that something of historic significance happened there.

    • @tula1433
      @tula1433 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Same! I live in Manchester! Wild!

  • @ivanoguido8026
    @ivanoguido8026 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fantastic job, Jared! Clear, understandable and full of information. Thank you!

  • @neurofiedyamato8763
    @neurofiedyamato8763 5 ปีที่แล้ว +239

    I don't think airships are obsolete. They would be awesome as a luxury cruise much like ships. long distance travel will be dominated by fixed wing but airships can still be use for luxury cruises.

    • @q.e.d.9112
      @q.e.d.9112 5 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      Matthew Morycinski
      Until we start running fusion reactors, then we’ll have heaps of helium. But weight will always be the issue with airships. Another disadvantage, they operate at levels that subject them to a lot of weather, whereas modern aircraft cruise well above the weather. They could probably use dehumidifiers to capture water. Like you, I don’t think they’d be suitable as cruise liners, but maybe some billionaire might like a private Airyacht. Great platform for viewing things like the America’s Cup, or F1 Grand Prix.
      I’m afraid they’re always going to be unwieldy things, close to the ground, in turbulent weather. Severe wind shear could spin one out of control, though modern vectored thrust would help mitigate this.
      Sorry, just rambling. Must be time for bed.

    • @PabloGonzalez-hv3td
      @PabloGonzalez-hv3td 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That's what first class, private jets and yachts are for

    • @TheMaster4534
      @TheMaster4534 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Airships can also be used as flying cargo ships due to restricted weight limit of fixed wing aircraft.

    • @samanli-tw3id
      @samanli-tw3id 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Levente Lénárt Try to put a swimming pool on an airship!

    • @RohitBorah
      @RohitBorah 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      these are fuel efficient as well

  • @lilyfurley9833
    @lilyfurley9833 5 ปีที่แล้ว +263

    im really glad you didnt censor history

    • @boataxe4605
      @boataxe4605 5 ปีที่แล้ว +48

      And I’m really glad that You Tube has not demonetized him ( yet?) For being historically accurate.

    • @eyyo_0236
      @eyyo_0236 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lily Furley fuck U

    • @arespeverell9877
      @arespeverell9877 5 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      @@eyyo_0236 Thats Fucking Rude!

    • @fuckthepolice.9410
      @fuckthepolice.9410 5 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      @@eyyo_0236 heeeeere snowflake heeeeere snowflake

    • @dxov1597
      @dxov1597 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Bay max steve why are you mad wtf are you cocaine

  • @siept
    @siept 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Het was zeker leuk om te kijken. Mooi gemaakt en heel wat duidelijker dan zwart-wit beelden uit de jaren 30

  • @secretgarden4287
    @secretgarden4287 4 ปีที่แล้ว +349

    Brief description:
    He doesn't know what happened either.

    • @toxiicmayhemzz6686
      @toxiicmayhemzz6686 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      thx

    • @CouchPotato-my1oj
      @CouchPotato-my1oj 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I’m guessing a cigarette spark made it’s way into the hydrogen or lightning stuck the gas

    • @CouchPotato-my1oj
      @CouchPotato-my1oj 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Eric Miret shut up it’s just a guess b

    • @poncianof.amorin9455
      @poncianof.amorin9455 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@CouchPotato-my1oj bc ur wrong

    • @CouchPotato-my1oj
      @CouchPotato-my1oj 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@poncianof.amorin9455 it’s just a guess karen

  • @takurotsuchiya4313
    @takurotsuchiya4313 5 ปีที่แล้ว +500

    If you don't have ticket you will get throw off of the ship

  • @contentdeprived2168
    @contentdeprived2168 4 ปีที่แล้ว +94

    Such a graceful machine being destroyed is quite saddening I won’t lie

    • @akromimubarok6626
      @akromimubarok6626 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Im going to be rich and rebuild this wonderful airship

    • @contentdeprived2168
      @contentdeprived2168 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@akromimubarok6626 i hope so

    • @KutWrite
      @KutWrite 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Umm... The people, too.

    • @thunderbird1921
      @thunderbird1921 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I'm not sure if it was on the fatal last flight, but from what I've read, the Hindenburg on at least one occasion flew directly over the location where Titanic sunk over two decades earlier (and apparently the passengers on the airship looked down from the windows in sad remembrance). If true, what a CREEPY coincidence, and foreshadowing!

    • @laikeree_4213
      @laikeree_4213 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@thunderbird1921
      Holy crud 😳

  • @melciveng
    @melciveng ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellent graphics and an actual human voiceover ✅

  • @L00PdeL00P
    @L00PdeL00P 5 ปีที่แล้ว +67

    You really explain everything so well! Awesome video, dude

  • @Jeff-fn-G
    @Jeff-fn-G 3 ปีที่แล้ว +100

    Bro, just watched for the first time. Although I'm late to the party, I needed to say - thank you. This is excellent content. I'm looking forward to watching the rest of your videos. Well done!

    • @JaredOwen
      @JaredOwen  3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Thanks Jeff😀

  • @EstefaniaValentin-es8pk
    @EstefaniaValentin-es8pk 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Muy bueno, tanto el texto como la animación. 👏👏👏

  • @tyrantking9000
    @tyrantking9000 4 ปีที่แล้ว +361

    "they used Hydrogen."
    Me: *spits drink* "THEY _WHAT?!_ "

    • @matdattein
      @matdattein 4 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      They used hydrogen

    • @canasmax5237
      @canasmax5237 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@matdattein *WHAT WAS THAT?*

    • @tyrantking9000
      @tyrantking9000 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@matdattein they _WHAT_

    • @Predator1706
      @Predator1706 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      TheSoftDrink gen of hydro

    • @WheelsRCool
      @WheelsRCool 4 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      The Germans successfully flew hydrogen airships through thunder and lightning storms. Hydrogen was viewed as safe so long as proper safety procedures were adhered to. Some wonder if it was sabotage that did the Hindenburg in.

  • @zudemaster
    @zudemaster 3 ปีที่แล้ว +160

    The technology for its time was amazing. Less than 50 years earlier and the main forms of transportation were the horse and buggy, and maybe a steam powered locomotive or ship if you were able to afford the price. It really is amazing when you look at how fast technology grew throughout the 20th century and compare that throughout the rest of history and so much of it came from Germany.

    • @jenhofmann
      @jenhofmann 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      ... including the technology to round up and murder millions of innocent people.

    • @iROMine
      @iROMine ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nah I mean planes existed at this point too

    • @maplebear6527
      @maplebear6527 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think the Germans had GREAT ideas that i wish could have been fulfilled.

    • @lvooroom
      @lvooroom หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@maplebear6527Отличные идеи?))) например уничтожение нации в концлагерях?

  • @mrRufffnTumble
    @mrRufffnTumble 4 ปีที่แล้ว +288

    If I could bring any technology back from the past it would probably be these zeppelin airships. They are so cool, would love to see them flying low over the city.

    • @archiewood4599
      @archiewood4599 3 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      if i saw a zeppelin over my city i would get in the car and drive

    • @helkade
      @helkade 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      @@archiewood4599 i live in Germany and here are some Zeppelins :D

    • @elainew2230
      @elainew2230 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I think there is a museum in Europe with a recreation of one of the airships.

    • @kimmybrandt
      @kimmybrandt 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Same! I so want to go in one before I die

    • @aniksamiurrahman6365
      @aniksamiurrahman6365 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Fun fact! If we can make Zeppelin out of Graphene, then we won't need any hydrogen or helium. The only reason why Zeppelins need those gas is that such a large metal frame can't keep its shape and be light enough to fly at the same time.

  • @nicolasuribestanko
    @nicolasuribestanko ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice computer simulation. Observations: 1) The smoking room was kept at a negative atmospheric pressure to prevent any sparks or embers from accidentally traveling outwards. Your arrows in the depiction should be facing the other way. 2) The great circle route from Germany to Lakehurst takes you far north, almost to Greenland. Your depiction shows an impossibly long route over the Atlantic.

  • @NotLRK
    @NotLRK 5 ปีที่แล้ว +282

    The sounded like the best ship to fly and chill on sad it broke

    • @intrst4532
      @intrst4532 5 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      F3ARM3 broke

    • @hiphopguru81
      @hiphopguru81 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@intrst4532 LOL

    • @saumyalimbu6918
      @saumyalimbu6918 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hàha

    • @FlyLeah
      @FlyLeah 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Only cause the US was selfish with not providing helium for sale

    • @immigrantgaming420epic
      @immigrantgaming420epic 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@FlyLeah they did that because they didn't want them making helium bombers, not being selfish or something

  • @insertname5407
    @insertname5407 5 ปีที่แล้ว +268

    Can you do: How a locomotive/steam locomotive works?
    Great video btw!

    • @jacekmak87
      @jacekmak87 5 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      It just goes choo choo. Thats all

    • @mikewizz1895
      @mikewizz1895 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jacekmak87 This comment kinda annoys me, just because of how you think trains work. I hope it was a joke

    • @jacekmak87
      @jacekmak87 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@mikewizz1895 It's true that's what they do - a choo choo and ocassionaly tooot. That's a fact. And facts don't care about your feelings. Deal with it snowflake.

    • @tadwyn
      @tadwyn 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There are forums on the net that talk in depth on steam power and how it works. As Oscar said "It would take a lot of typing to tell" I would suggest one of the steam car clubs for information. Read a lot and politely ask questions. The closest in operation to a locomotive in operation is a traction engine . A friend of someone I know rebuilds those and its fascinating.

  • @tomitstube
    @tomitstube 4 ปีที่แล้ว +135

    excellent video, there was however much more to the landing attempt, like a 3 hour delay waiting for weather to clear up, and three water ballast drops to level the ship. further indicating a gas leak. but i thoroughly enjoyed the ship design presentation.

    • @raven4k998
      @raven4k998 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      lol because they were sissy's modern pilots can do it in two🤣

  • @kitakazehai
    @kitakazehai 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    日本語での解説、ありがとうございます。字幕は完璧でしたが漢字の読み間違いが多かったです。ひらがなの部分と区切り方は完璧だったので、漢字にひらがなでルビを付けて読まれたら、すごく良くなると思います。

    • @Uncle_Sasha_no.1
      @Uncle_Sasha_no.1 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Это нейросеть...

  • @millenniumvintage9726
    @millenniumvintage9726 ปีที่แล้ว +68

    4:44 Small detail but at the time Germanys borders were different than what’s pictured. Their eastern border extended further into modern day Poland past the Oder river and they owned an enclave in East Prussia.

  • @OfentseMwaseFilms
    @OfentseMwaseFilms ปีที่แล้ว +153

    Great video. Thank you for all the info.

  • @jonskowitz
    @jonskowitz 5 ปีที่แล้ว +60

    There's just something so majestic about airships that makes me kind of sad that they're gone.
    Ok, enough nostalgia. Airships never had a very good safety record even without fires. They're just too susceptible to storms and other weather.

    • @mandernachluca3774
      @mandernachluca3774 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Well, from an engineering perspective, airships are majestic too, not because of some kind if nostalgia but because of their functionality. Until today their hasn't been a much more energy efficient way to travel through the air, than using an airship, in fact, airships might make a comeback as a super efficient transportation methode.

    • @drumdad54sdl47
      @drumdad54sdl47 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Dr Hugo Eckener, the head honcho of the Zeppelin company, has been quoted as saying that he was well aware of the psychological effect of seeing a large airship in the sky. Incredibly impressive, I say. What a sight they must have been. *sigh**

    • @bigredc222
      @bigredc222 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yea, the US navy lost a lot people in air ship crashes, and used helium.

    • @EdsterIII
      @EdsterIII 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      As majestic as they do look, as you said they also have a serious risk factor. Any storm or big cross wind. Yikes. I do appreciate the look of them. They do glide seamlessly through the air but any little hiccup could be tragic.

  • @JamesCarmichael
    @JamesCarmichael 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Absolutely fascinating and captivating. To see the inner workings of these old historical events/vehicles is amazing.

    • @JaredOwen
      @JaredOwen  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you James, I'm glad you enjoyed it!

  • @katatat2030
    @katatat2030 3 ปีที่แล้ว +69

    I've heard it mentioned by others that a thunderstorm was building at the time, which could easily have been the cause of the static buildup

    • @kennymartin5976
      @kennymartin5976 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      I saw an investigative documentary on this the other day, and they did a serries of test to prove that large static charges could have easily occurred under the conditions that day.

    • @rudeawakening3833
      @rudeawakening3833 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Or a “ tracer “ round from a rifle in the nearby woods …

  • @Nysvarth
    @Nysvarth 3 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    Came here to find out the cause of the accident, 7 minutes into the video:
    7:26 "No-one knows for sure what caused the ship to catch on fire"
    Thanks, really cleared things up for me.

    • @aeciocarvalho8958
      @aeciocarvalho8958 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      KKKKKKKKKKKKK

    • @supertoasting1011
      @supertoasting1011 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Here is a plausible hypothesis I read about.
      The Hindenburg may have steered too aggressively on approach which caused some structural damage that ruptured a hydrogen cell. When the mooring lines made contact with the ground it may have discharged some static electricity since everything was soaked from the rain. It would have just taken one small spark in the area with the leak to ignite.

    • @brodster7042
      @brodster7042 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @theo nicole Houston if it was the smoking room the explosion would be in the front

  • @minecraftheaven5965
    @minecraftheaven5965 5 ปีที่แล้ว +102

    This was actually my science homework, Lucky you made this video! Thank you!

    • @rawvid9065
      @rawvid9065 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Gonna get that a ? Good luck

    • @JaredOwen
      @JaredOwen  5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Glad to help out!

    • @Roman-rx2tm
      @Roman-rx2tm 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Lucky

    • @cringecap1372
      @cringecap1372 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      lol what the freak happen to steve

    • @andrade4630
      @andrade4630 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      What's you gets in meths

  • @russellswanson7907
    @russellswanson7907 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is a great animation!! extremely well done! Thank you very much for doing it.

  • @urmombiggay6488
    @urmombiggay6488 4 ปีที่แล้ว +377

    "Hey let's put a smoking room in the place where there is the most amount of hydrogen compressed in the whole world like wtf could go wrong" 😤🙌

    • @pas5735
      @pas5735 4 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      If there wasn’t a smoking room no one at the time would board it

    • @somelokyguy6466
      @somelokyguy6466 4 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      The smoking room actually made the ship safer.

    • @somelokyguy6466
      @somelokyguy6466 3 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      @Zan People were gonna smoke onboard regardless of whether there was a dedicated smoking room or not.
      It's better to have all your smokers in a single controlled area instead of hiding in various places. It's why airline toilets still have ashtrays, the designers know people will smoke in the toilets and putting ashes in the bin is a fire hazard.

    • @Ronnie-Jones
      @Ronnie-Jones 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The most forbidden documentary in history:
      “Europa The Last Battle” at archive dot org
      archive.org/details/EUROPATheLastBattle

    • @haassteambraker9959
      @haassteambraker9959 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The hydrogen was not compressed. Airships such as these rely entirely on being lighter than the volume of air that they displace (same principles as a boat or submarine). Compressing hydrogen would make it denser, and completely defeat its function as a lifting gas. Not to mention pressure vessels for any substantial amount of hydrogen would be quite heavy.

  • @dontcheckmyyoutubeprofilep199
    @dontcheckmyyoutubeprofilep199 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    man gave us a whole 5 star tour of the hiddenburg

  • @newbeginnings8566
    @newbeginnings8566 4 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    The most wide held theory now is that the airship tried to turn too quickly causing too much stress on the rear section.. This damage led to rupture of the rear gas bags which then ignited.. The resulting chain reaction throughout the airship caused the final destruction...

    • @Alombe
      @Alombe 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@somedumbozzie1539 It was not count Zeppelin, he was not alive at this time, it was Hugo Echner that was the head of the Zeppelin company at the time of the disaster and he was furious as you said

  • @mrbeirut23
    @mrbeirut23 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you! Was wondering about this for a week

  • @stephenbrand5661
    @stephenbrand5661 3 ปีที่แล้ว +54

    4:50 This map shows what Germany looked like after 1990, very different from what it looked like in 1937.

    • @ARG0T
      @ARG0T 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      it needs most of silesia, pomerania and east prussia

    • @AndreStutzer-yk7eg
      @AndreStutzer-yk7eg 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Right. This is the map after the reunion of West and East Germany and not the one of 1937. And that time it was the German Empire (Deutsches Reich) and not Germany.

    • @gamering2354
      @gamering2354 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      * 4:44

    • @stephenbrand5661
      @stephenbrand5661 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@gamering2354 danke

  • @afoxwithahat7846
    @afoxwithahat7846 5 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    Hydrogen shouldn't have the same color of the other elements :)
    But that's just the best explanation I ever saw.

  • @justicewokeisutterbs8641
    @justicewokeisutterbs8641 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    A very good presentation, very well produced. I've known about the Hindenburg disaster for decades. It's great to have a more comprehensive understanding of the airship and it's structure. Thanks. 👍

  • @kroarchive
    @kroarchive ปีที่แล้ว

    great video! Thanks for the time put into it! I shared it to my blog

  • @zinc_trioxide
    @zinc_trioxide 3 ปีที่แล้ว +134

    If theres no hindenburg accident imagine zeppelin technology today

    • @aleph_zero1
      @aleph_zero1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      I think the world would still switch to modern airplane anyway

    • @auralplex
      @auralplex 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@aleph_zero1 Nah dog, balloons are way better.

    • @wlink639
      @wlink639 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'd imagine that at some point engines got powerful enough using hydrogen/hellium balloons for lift wasn't worth it anymore.

    • @jonahsuddeth5893
      @jonahsuddeth5893 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Now days a few companies are working on making new airships and using jet streams they will compete with the speed of jets

    • @mattjackson9859
      @mattjackson9859 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Niko MyCousin Not inflammable - would use helium, not hydrogen

  • @__-pl3jg
    @__-pl3jg 5 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    This is my favorite animation thus far! This should be shown in schools. It illustrates the power of media in forming future markets. It also shows that Helium filled air ships with modern safety features like parachutes would actually be a very good idea for future travel.
    Also, something not mentioned...The Hindenburg gas bladders were made of animal skins glued together. Modern materials would be waaaay better at preventing leaks.

    • @JaredOwen
      @JaredOwen  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you for your comment!

    • @thefirstprimariscatosicari6870
      @thefirstprimariscatosicari6870 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Helium filled "airships" are still in use for transportation. Mostly for scientific (or military) purposes, transporting mastly cargo and not people, but there are plans to use them as cheap telephone/internet stations or to transport people and cargo to areas where it would he impossible to build a conventional airfield.

    • @camojoe83
      @camojoe83 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Helium..
      You do know how rare helium is, right?

    • @thefirstprimariscatosicari6870
      @thefirstprimariscatosicari6870 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@camojoe83 We use it in balloons in industrial quantities.

    • @TheOwenMajor
      @TheOwenMajor 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The only way airships could make a resurgence is with hydrogen lifting gas.
      Simple economics and operations mean that helium would never work.

  • @cbesthelper404
    @cbesthelper404 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Wonderfully done, Jared. You explained everything so clearly. Outstanding job with the visuals as well!

  • @semplar2007
    @semplar2007 ปีที่แล้ว

    animation and narrations are so good! what a horrific disaster

  • @Zerbey
    @Zerbey 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Fascinating video, first time I've ever seen such a detailed tour of the interior.

  • @zacmumblethunder7466
    @zacmumblethunder7466 5 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Whenever I see a "What happened to " title, I can't help remembering my mother's reaction in a shop to a shelf full of books about the Titanic. Pointing to one called "All you need to know about Titanic" she said "It sank, that's all you need to know".
    Good video though, I've always loved airships.

    • @JaredOwen
      @JaredOwen  5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Good point Zac! I guess "All you need to know" is kind of a relative statement. Thanks for watching my video

    • @zacmumblethunder7466
      @zacmumblethunder7466 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@JaredOwen My mother has opinions. And if anyone doesn't like any of them, she's got a whole heap of others as well.
      I've never seen such a clear description of the interior of an airship. Thanks!

    • @ashwinv3750
      @ashwinv3750 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      yyyyýyyyyýyyyyyuyuuuuuuuý7ir

    • @monojdas1914
      @monojdas1914 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ashwinv3750 youre just a dumb person so shut up

    • @ashwinv3750
      @ashwinv3750 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@monojdas1914 poo in the loo

  • @stevephlyer
    @stevephlyer ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Wonderfully produced video, again. So interesting to learn about the internal features of this iconic and gigantic airship. Well done!

  • @thewatcher5271
    @thewatcher5271 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That Was Very Cool! Heard About It My Whole Life & Saw The Famous News Clip But You Made It Very Interesting. Thank You.

  • @18skunk18
    @18skunk18 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    This Video was fun and very informative. We thank for putting love and passion that makes this documentation Interesting.
    Thank You.

    • @JaredOwen
      @JaredOwen  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Your welcome!

  • @Wizard4k
    @Wizard4k 3 ปีที่แล้ว +66

    Alternate reality shows when they need a way to transport: *AIR SHIPS*

  • @-C.S.R
    @-C.S.R 5 ปีที่แล้ว +200

    Static electricity for sure! When they threw the ropes down they hit the water that was in puddles on the ground! The charge went up the ropes and kaboom!

    • @gunnerkolb2066
      @gunnerkolb2066 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      C.S.R 🤯🤯🤯

    • @cubnation
      @cubnation 5 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      Who knows though. Couldn't the air be surcharged with static electricity because of the storms that passed through?

    • @Cheese_Doggy12
      @Cheese_Doggy12 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Eh..

    • @PlebanMuzeum
      @PlebanMuzeum 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      The charge always goes down to the ground, just like when you touch (or at least should do) your car after getting off on a gas station, before getting the gasoline. The rest could be as you say.

    • @cubnation
      @cubnation 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@PlebanMuzeum That makes a lot of sense. :)

  • @Birdion-du6kv
    @Birdion-du6kv 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video. Always am making sure to see new videos. Good luck! 🍀

  • @moymoy5918
    @moymoy5918 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    his animation is SICK! i love it

  • @mclover1053
    @mclover1053 2 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    6:30 this was the moment the airship became Hindenburg

    • @idioticproductions4000
      @idioticproductions4000 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I AM NOT IN DANGER, I AM THE DANGER

    • @Ok-fj7xx
      @Ok-fj7xx ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I am not in the hanger I am the hanger

    • @toptenguy1
      @toptenguy1 ปีที่แล้ว

      OMG lol

  • @davesuiter
    @davesuiter ปีที่แล้ว +221

    The fire was caused on the skin of the ship due to static electricity; the ship was one giant capacitor. When the hemp rope got wet from the rain, it became a conductor.

    • @Ct.1010
      @Ct.1010 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes.

    • @klausrachuy6411
      @klausrachuy6411 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      That can’t be. The ropes went down quite a while before the explosion.

    • @sixstanger00
      @sixstanger00 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I don't think a static discharge would be strong enough to conduct that far. Rope is a very poor conductor, even when wet. It would require a fairly high voltage jolt to travel the length of the hemp rope.
      My speculation is that the ropes were dry, but served as a ground wire. The hemp ropes would've been anchored to something metal at both ends, and the ship-end would've connected to the metal frame somehow, which is far more conductive than than ship's skin. The rain in the storm(s) are probably what caused it to be positively charged inside and out. That's the thing -- just like if you were to stand on a power line, you wouldn't know there's a massive charge passing through you until you grounded yourself.
      The second the hemp ropes hit the ground, the charge has a pathway to the ground.

    • @westzed23
      @westzed23 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I heard that the paint used on the airship was extremely flammable and that was one reason the fire spread so fast. Has anyone else heard this?

    • @dbspecials1200
      @dbspecials1200 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      But there had to be a leak, something explosive has to be ignited by the static charge. the charge is a natural phenom everywhere but you can't have anything flammable in the contact. sometimes we see accidents at fueling stations with static.

  • @Francks_
    @Francks_ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +133

    Fun fact: Led Zeppelin used a picture of Hidenburg on fire in their first album's artwork

    • @esharp3722
      @esharp3722 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      the album was released on January 12th, 1969; 32 years after the disaster

    • @lust4power
      @lust4power 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      They also got their bands name from a radio station making fun of their band not having a name and said they were going down like a lead zeppelin

    • @DeadwaxTV
      @DeadwaxTV 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@lust4power Half correct. It was Keith Moon that gave them the idea for the name. Same quote though.

    • @nathanbabiuk6286
      @nathanbabiuk6286 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Duh

    • @hafiyikhwan6450
      @hafiyikhwan6450 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      what album is it? mothership?

  • @thomass.7262
    @thomass.7262 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video - so much information in that short clip!

  • @funquay2219
    @funquay2219 3 ปีที่แล้ว +75

    I remember reading somewhere that one of the Captains escaped the flames, but then turned back and re-entered the wreckage to help the injured. He was badly burnt but survived. I wonder if anyone would do that these days? I hope so.

    • @notmenotme614
      @notmenotme614 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      It’s in the news today that 3 cops in Arizona stood and watched a man drown as they said to him “I’m not going after you”

    • @sinjin90ful
      @sinjin90ful 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @@notmenotme614 i saw that i live in AZ he ran from them jumped in and tried swimming to escape cops told him not going in. You know how risky it is to save a drowning man with no flotation devices? they will drag you down. He made his choice

    • @valgo8128
      @valgo8128 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@notmenotme614 cops have my full support

    • @notmenotme614
      @notmenotme614 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@valgo8128 full support to stand there and do nothing to help

    • @valgo8128
      @valgo8128 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@notmenotme614 Nobody expects them to jump in

  • @imtootiredforthis7694
    @imtootiredforthis7694 3 ปีที่แล้ว +212

    I find it weird how hydrogen, a flammable gas, and oxygen, a flammable gas, when combined create water, a nonflammable substance.
    Edit: Yes, I now know that oxygen isn't flammable.

    • @ar.malavikajayan2485
      @ar.malavikajayan2485 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      -ve x -ve = +ve

    • @imtootiredforthis7694
      @imtootiredforthis7694 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@ar.malavikajayan2485 could you dumb it down please.

    • @waterdoggo4998
      @waterdoggo4998 3 ปีที่แล้ว +50

      @@imtootiredforthis7694 negative x negative = positive
      as flammable x flammable = nonflammable

    • @harishsivaramakrishnan7096
      @harishsivaramakrishnan7096 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@waterdoggo4998 some brilliant minds here. I feel unqualified to be here actually!

    • @r1konTheAutomator
      @r1konTheAutomator 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      Regular ol table salt comes from a mineral that, when exposed to water, bursts into flames and explodes. Take that, mix it with a poisonous gas, and put it in your salt shaker. Chemistry is a hell of a thing

  • @robinl4975
    @robinl4975 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    This video is simply amazing! So detailed and so much information about this incredible airship!

  • @RARufus
    @RARufus 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My grandma passed last year at 102 years and told us many times about seeing the Hindenburg docked in NY when she was a child. A few years later the disaster happened.

  • @rampage3390
    @rampage3390 5 ปีที่แล้ว +444

    *sees swastika*
    TH-cam: DEMONITIZED

    • @lsswappedcessna
      @lsswappedcessna 5 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      Even though he animates that symbol burning at the end and the real airship had the swastika on it, TH-cam always takes shit out of context.

    • @andmos1001
      @andmos1001 5 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Killergaming well, it is an historical design on the Hindenburg.

    • @ChucksSEADnDEAD
      @ChucksSEADnDEAD 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@andmos1001 Forgotten Weapons is a historical show on firearms and they have to blur the swastika on the flag they use to represent country of origin.

    • @Don_Camillo
      @Don_Camillo 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Authenticity, not ideology.

    • @mdsupreme1776
      @mdsupreme1776 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Titanium Rain Liberals are so incredible sensitive