At 1:30 it says: "migration is often the most commonly stated concern over the future of European welfare states. Despite a widespread opinion that migrants come to Europe to exploit its benefit systems. The program has PROVEN that this is simply not true. In fact, immigrant pay more in taxes than they take out in benefits. Rather than a burden, migration benefits welfare states". Is this really proven? If indeed the case, where can I read the details about this? Thanks in advance for your reply!
Continental, more generous pensions, more universal provision paid by taxes or pay as you go systems… liberal (or Anglo Saxon) little provision made as a floor, not as a supplement to living… Nordic more generous welfare cradle to grave.
@@TheKeithvidz so where do you draw the line for who can and can't get welfare? So that it doesn't become a socialist state? Serious question. When I hear advocates for a "welfare state" it sounds scary, especially when people come to view it as a human right or entitlement like what's happening in America now. I also disagree that "none should be poor"....being poor should be a great motivator and build character and work ethic to work hard and lift yourself out of poverty, to live a life of dignity and not dependent on the state for welfare entitlements that ultimately discourage and deincentivizes hard work.... I think those with disabilities and other extreme cases should get it. But Most other cases basically keep people in a cycle of complacency and poverty and only works until you run out of other people's money. So I'm just wondering, where do you draw the line?
@@TheRealIG Last time we're done, do not respond - "being poor should be a great motivator and build character and work ethic to work hard and lift yourself out of poverty" - i tell you think of this: 1st you perhaps never were treading in your life, 2nd ask yourself the 8 men with wealth equal to half the planet they worked equivalent time for that cash?
@@TheKeithvidzI grew up poor, single black mother from Ethiopia who could barely speak English, I've had to live out of my car for months on end at different occasions. I know what it's like to be poor. Trust me I have more "victim points" than a probably white-guilt-ridden leftist like you. Yet I still worked hard and studied hard and scored above the 95th Percentile on the dental admissions test (dental equivalent of the MCAT) and now attending dental school. I refused to ever act like a victim and I worked to make my own life goals happen. You can literally make 6 figures as a truck driver with a CDL dude, no college needed. Theres so many opportunities out there that so many people have access to but don't want to put in the work to realize that type of self-made success. Why are you so worried about the money that others have instead of finding ways that you yourself can make your own money with dignity. It sounds like what you are calling for is actual socialism, you want to redistribute the wealth from the haves to have-nots... That's some dangerous ideology you have there. Reference Venezuela, China, north Korea, USSR, Vietnam, East Germany, or even the Marxist communist regime of Ethiopia that my mom fled from. No wonder she is so against any form of socialism too... You also disingenuously left out how many jobs and employment opportunities those evil 8 people at the top provide to the free market for 1000s of people below them. Or do you also think the government would be better able to decide how and where we get our employment and money from? Cuz that historically never turns out well.... Just admit it, you're a marxist/socialist. I can also tell by how unwilling you are to defend your ideas with any evidence based reasoning, other than having government mandated wealth redistribution
Get elderly people to “free” nursing homes and get bad treatment support welfare system. Don’t want elderly people to get bad treatment? Forget about welfare. And if you don’t like monopoly, don’t support welfare.
@@tefky7964 better access to private owned nursing homes by having less taxes. More choices between nursing homes in general. Competition between nursing homes, as in if the elderly people don't like the service from one private nursing home they can switch to whole different nursing home. Better or worse, it's all up to each elderly individuals for example. Switching between public nursing homes, you will get similar treatment because there's no competition between them. There's simply too little resources to each elderly individuals needs as there are much more elderly people than workers and the welfare box, as I call it, has to be distributed between nursing homes, education, healthcare and so on. There are some public nursing homes, use robots to get the elderly peoples needs met but it can never replace humans or animals to solve loneliness. I am aware that there will be some elderly people who can't afford better treatments because of generally low income or bad economical decisions. Nothing is perfect, we either pick crap or crap feel free to ask more questions and btw you asked a good question
At 1:30 it says:
"migration is often the most commonly stated concern over the future of European welfare states. Despite a widespread opinion that migrants come to Europe to exploit its benefit systems. The program has PROVEN that this is simply not true. In fact, immigrant pay more in taxes than they take out in benefits. Rather than a burden, migration benefits welfare states".
Is this really proven? If indeed the case, where can I read the details about this? Thanks in advance for your reply!
The subject of this video, the NORFACE Welfare State Futures Programme. Richard J Murphy recently did a good video on the welfare state too.
Can someone tell me the models of welfare state
Continental, more generous pensions, more universal provision paid by taxes or pay as you go systems… liberal (or Anglo Saxon) little provision made as a floor, not as a supplement to living… Nordic more generous welfare cradle to grave.
@@reecemacaulay1690none of those are models in of themselves, those are just descriptors.
i support welfare, none should be poor.
So you support communism
@@TheRealIG u not worth it.
@@TheKeithvidz so where do you draw the line for who can and can't get welfare? So that it doesn't become a socialist state? Serious question. When I hear advocates for a "welfare state" it sounds scary, especially when people come to view it as a human right or entitlement like what's happening in America now.
I also disagree that "none should be poor"....being poor should be a great motivator and build character and work ethic to work hard and lift yourself out of poverty, to live a life of dignity and not dependent on the state for welfare entitlements that ultimately discourage and deincentivizes hard work....
I think those with disabilities and other extreme cases should get it. But Most other cases basically keep people in a cycle of complacency and poverty and only works until you run out of other people's money.
So I'm just wondering, where do you draw the line?
@@TheRealIG Last time we're done, do not respond - "being poor should be a great motivator and build character and work ethic to work hard and lift yourself out of poverty"
- i tell you think of this: 1st you perhaps never were treading in your life, 2nd ask yourself the 8 men with wealth equal to half the planet they worked equivalent time for that cash?
@@TheKeithvidzI grew up poor, single black mother from Ethiopia who could barely speak English, I've had to live out of my car for months on end at different occasions. I know what it's like to be poor. Trust me I have more "victim points" than a probably white-guilt-ridden leftist like you. Yet I still worked hard and studied hard and scored above the 95th Percentile on the dental admissions test (dental equivalent of the MCAT) and now attending dental school. I refused to ever act like a victim and I worked to make my own life goals happen. You can literally make 6 figures as a truck driver with a CDL dude, no college needed. Theres so many opportunities out there that so many people have access to but don't want to put in the work to realize that type of self-made success. Why are you so worried about the money that others have instead of finding ways that you yourself can make your own money with dignity. It sounds like what you are calling for is actual socialism, you want to redistribute the wealth from the haves to have-nots... That's some dangerous ideology you have there. Reference Venezuela, China, north Korea, USSR, Vietnam, East Germany, or even the Marxist communist regime of Ethiopia that my mom fled from. No wonder she is so against any form of socialism too...
You also disingenuously left out how many jobs and employment opportunities those evil 8 people at the top provide to the free market for 1000s of people below them. Or do you also think the government would be better able to decide how and where we get our employment and money from? Cuz that historically never turns out well....
Just admit it, you're a marxist/socialist. I can also tell by how unwilling you are to defend your ideas with any evidence based reasoning, other than having government mandated wealth redistribution
Get elderly people to “free” nursing homes and get bad treatment support welfare system.
Don’t want elderly people to get bad treatment? Forget about welfare.
And if you don’t like monopoly, don’t support welfare.
How exactly do elderly get that good treatment?
@@tefky7964 better access to private owned nursing homes by having less taxes. More choices between nursing homes in general. Competition between nursing homes, as in if the elderly people don't like the service from one private nursing home they can switch to whole different nursing home. Better or worse, it's all up to each elderly individuals for example.
Switching between public nursing homes, you will get similar treatment because there's no competition between them.
There's simply too little resources to each elderly individuals needs as there are much more elderly people than workers and the welfare box, as I call it, has to be distributed between nursing homes, education, healthcare and so on.
There are some public nursing homes, use robots to get the elderly peoples needs met but it can never replace humans or animals to solve loneliness.
I am aware that there will be some elderly people who can't afford better treatments because of generally low income or bad economical decisions. Nothing is perfect, we either pick crap or crap
feel free to ask more questions and btw you asked a good question
Free handouts for everybody😎 i hate working, its pointless.
In some cases it is.
the future is anarcocapitalist