Thank you very much for this interview. Truly hope that as a society we will find the answer to the big question on how to come together as a community that respects one’s life and dignity.
"Whatever you do, just bring a couple of drones" ❤Love this ending, love this interview. Will send it to some of my International friends. Great job discussing important subjects. Keep up the good work 💪
Peter Pomerantsev is one of the most outstanding intellectuals that is making amazing job of Prosvita,or helping the world to understand this war of russia against Ucraine. I'm so grateful for such extraordinary commitment to the Ucrainian cause !🎩👏💙💛💙💛
Absolutely critical point about the need for a reckoning! There is so much evidence of lies and crimes, yet so little justice. This is a root cause of our collective madness.
Come and do whatever you want, but bring a drone or two with you 😁What's enlightening about this interview is how boring and mundane the real work against bad propaganda is. It won't be a fun exercise of implementing a silver bullet strategy. It takes years, it takes funding, it takes millions of hours of volunteer work. Make it a part of your life.
The interview is indeed interesting, have watched it both in Ukrainian and English. Thanks. The questions I have missed there and would like to hear Peter’s answers: Are values still/ again important to the world, and how they can help in debunking the Russian propaganda? Is it totalitarianism/authoritarianism that makes Russian propaganda work on so deep unconscious level?
Glory to Ukraine 🇺🇦 Also visit and spend money in Lviv. My relatives in Poland go very often. It’s a cultural Mecca. I was there in 2015 and can’t wait to return.
Just fyi, “glory to ukraine” is an actual Nazi slogan as encoded into the Ukranian Constitution of 1939 where it was promised that ukraine will be formed with union and under leadership of Germany and its supreme leader - Adolf Hitler.
This is fascinating, and I love his work. Just some pithy thoughts to get out there as I listen to it: All information is influence, just as every stimulus needs a response and every response a stimulus. He covers that nicely in his own way, but I think my first four words there - “all information is influence” - makes it more succinct. Whether people use it for moral reasons, as he indicates, or for achieving a self-ingratiating end, such as making money or spreading malign influence, confusion, denial, deceit, doubt, or causing a distraction in an innocent or unwitting community alters whether the message is good or not. Obviously, Russia is deeply in the wrong here. Second, evidence within his books and other writings, such as ‘The Menace of Unreality,’ points to the fact that Russian society, and especially Russian leadership, don’t value truth, much less their target audiences, and shows that they believe that truth itself is subjective and therefore malleable to one’s own biases, interpretation, and liking. This, of course, means to the interpreter of truth that the interpreter of the truth is right, not the truth, and that any other interpretations are not and the truth itself gets quashed. This is a major fallacy, because the truth does not change based on interpretation; it merely says “I AM.” And if the interpretation is far off, consequences inevitably follow. (For example, different interpretations of January 6th may dilute what actually happened and lead us down roads where the problem simply gets left unresolved, but the truth behind the event is still there. I’d love to give other historical examples here, but let’s just say it’s bad to treat a single interpretation of the truth as gospel, especially if it’s from just one source that lacks credibility.) But we especially in the West (and even in ancient Chinese literature) believe that the truth is objective, with only its interpretations being malleable, which of course creates faults in understanding truth but gives us a way of course-correcting when we misinterpret it. It also gives us the ability to leverage diversity of thought to come to the best interpretation of what the truth actually is. And that’s why we succeed in virtually all areas compared to Russia, which suffers the consequences of relying on only the government’s interpretation of something, nefariously given or not. Okay, now I’ve become long-winded. Sorry! But just some thoughts.
Wow, your "pithy thoughts" are worthy of another interview, essay or similar imo. You hit the nail on the head with analysis of the truth and post-truth (-fact) on a phylosophical level. Your definition of it ("I AM") is better than that of my friend with PhD in philosophy, who said about truth ~'There is what there is, question remains how we see it'. Putinist and modern Autocratic ideology and/or (black-) propaganda based in that post truth, postmodern pluralism is best expressed by A. Dugin and borrows from I.Ilyin. Counterforce in "the west" to that weapon is Ayn Rand's school of objectivism. Unfortunately too many "disillusioned westerners" have fallen for seductive fallacies of the former. If "alternative facts" and revisioned history were not so compelling and effective, Russia and other autocracies/theocracies wouldn't spend billions and so much effort targeting "the west" and democratic systems with their info-viruses. Because some westerners are so receptive to it we have a real danger of informationsl zombie-apocalypse on our hands. I think the best vaccines against this corruption of reason and vision by and for the benefit of our adversaries is correct education and cultural awakening, as ignorance (willful or not) is like an informational HIV leading to internal detractor disease AIDS. There are parts of global societies pretty much immune to the autocratic propaganda viruses, and most of them come from so-called Eastern Europe, at least starting from middle aged population (including me). And still, because we mostly know the history, Russia and each other here, and our secret services have asessed how dangerous both disinformation, politic and local detractor influence campaigns are, we have put up both informational and legal defenses in our countries unparalelled in the older, traditional "west". I won't go into other aspect about "freedom of speech" in all this, which have been turned into a weapon and apology for genocidal enemies' info-warriors as i've already beaten you in long-windedness here. As i usually do. Because search for the truth (and God forbid justice) is never simple and can't be expressed in concise slogans and soundbites. That's why so many feebler minds hate it and prefer their "own" simpler realities.
Thank you for the interview! In terms of propaganda and bot farms, it would be interesting to hear Peter's thoughts of what an individual can (should?) do to fight them. For example, in twitter or facebook, there are different approaches, but engaging doesn't seem to work (in the means of a real person reading the conversation, if they don't have vast knowledge of Ukraine or what really happens and read somebody disputing with bot, they might not identify who is a bot or what is the truth); ignoring doesn't seem to work (bots flood the space and it feels like the only "truth" out there is what they say which easily transforms into "we cannot know what's happening"); trying to share more of say "our propaganda" doesn't work (because it is read as propaganda=it's always bad=you're a bot too). Is there a point at all in trying to, say, make our point of view heard?
I have been interested in how to get out messaging effectively for a while and wondered why the US doesn't have a more coherent strategy. I want to be able to spread the truth effectively. I also think it's important to spread the truth about the russian war crimes, this is part of the information war, and wonder how to do that. I haven't thought of propaganda as getting at people's needs but this makes sense. Does a certain culture/nationality have particular needs and why (what goes into conditioning them to this in the 1st place, history etc., what extent is it just universal psychological needs expressed in a specific context...) What would it take to get Americans to care about war crimes in Ukraine? I care just because I'm empathetic. What would it take to somehow reach the russian population and counter the mindset of apathy?
Very interesting but I found it depressing. It helped me to understand the Russian culture of disinformation or lieing. He who has the power holds the moral high ground and rewrites the moral compass of a country. I guess that's the outcome when a country is run by a corrupt mafia or gangster based regime.
Don't let it depress you, when that 83 year old Babushka, Vera Ivanova, called her Russian countrymen "Svoloch" (сволоч) in that street interview that went viral, she was not wrong.
I can't believe the same Yulia Tymoshenko that ran the Ukrainian Petrol Corporation and led the Orange Revolution got to sit down for an interview with Peter Pomerantsev, truly incredible! /s
Ukraine might have won the information campaign, though everyone outside the Ukraine bubble just laughed at the silly Ukraine. What counts is the actual battlefield situation. No amount of false information campaign can change that.
And you believe Putin’s 3-day March on Kyiv has been successful? The battlefield is constantly changing, but it’s clear Russia has not achieved their stated goals.
I’m wholly independent and I fully understand why Russia chose to invade and can also understand why Ukraine repels back. Ultimately, the west is responsible for all this death as it was within their power to avoid it. However, Zelensky has the blood of Ukrainians on his hands as he sold them out, in full knowledge that this would happen. In true Jewish fashion.
What a brilliant guest and conversation. Thank you Peter for your work
What a delightful interview! Your guest has such a clear view of things!
Thank you for inviting such an interesting guest.
It’s a great pleasure to watch a conversation of this quality!
Thank you very much for this interview. Truly hope that as a society we will find the answer to the big question on how to come together as a community that respects one’s life and dignity.
Thank you very much for this interview in English!
Thank you for this, great guest, great interview, will share with my friends in whole world.!❤
"Whatever you do, just bring a couple of drones" ❤Love this ending, love this interview. Will send it to some of my International friends.
Great job discussing important subjects. Keep up the good work 💪
Peter is always great, cutting edge info war.
Peter Pomerantsev is one of the most outstanding intellectuals that is making amazing job of Prosvita,or helping the world to understand this war of russia against Ucraine. I'm so grateful for such extraordinary commitment to the Ucrainian cause !🎩👏💙💛💙💛
Prostiva translates as “enlightening”. Ukraine is spelled uKraine. Peter is an idiot.
Amazing interview! Please keep inviting such interesting guests for interviews!
Thanks for posting this; will share.
Awesome video, thank you very much!
Absolutely critical point about the need for a reckoning! There is so much evidence of lies and crimes, yet so little justice. This is a root cause of our collective madness.
Fascinating
Come and do whatever you want, but bring a drone or two with you 😁What's enlightening about this interview is how boring and mundane the real work against bad propaganda is. It won't be a fun exercise of implementing a silver bullet strategy. It takes years, it takes funding, it takes millions of hours of volunteer work. Make it a part of your life.
this a quality talk. thanks!
Very interesting and educational
Tx Mr. Pomerantzev
The interview is indeed interesting, have watched it both in Ukrainian and English. Thanks. The questions I have missed there and would like to hear Peter’s answers: Are values still/ again important to the world, and how they can help in debunking the Russian propaganda? Is it totalitarianism/authoritarianism that makes Russian propaganda work on so deep unconscious level?
This was extremely interesting, I really hope we'll find a way to implement what he suggested.
Interesting video.
I’m excited. This information very important
Glory to Ukraine 🇺🇦
Also visit and spend money in Lviv.
My relatives in Poland go very often.
It’s a cultural Mecca. I was there in 2015
and can’t wait to return.
Just fyi, “glory to ukraine” is an actual Nazi slogan as encoded into the Ukranian Constitution of 1939 where it was promised that ukraine will be formed with union and under leadership of Germany and its supreme leader - Adolf Hitler.
Wonderful interview. Thank you very much for the insights. Profound.
Extremely interesting guest and topic, thank you!
(The uni must be the Johns Hopkins)
This is fascinating, and I love his work.
Just some pithy thoughts to get out there as I listen to it:
All information is influence, just as every stimulus needs a response and every response a stimulus. He covers that nicely in his own way, but I think my first four words there - “all information is influence” - makes it more succinct. Whether people use it for moral reasons, as he indicates, or for achieving a self-ingratiating end, such as making money or spreading malign influence, confusion, denial, deceit, doubt, or causing a distraction in an innocent or unwitting community alters whether the message is good or not. Obviously, Russia is deeply in the wrong here.
Second, evidence within his books and other writings, such as ‘The Menace of Unreality,’ points to the fact that Russian society, and especially Russian leadership, don’t value truth, much less their target audiences, and shows that they believe that truth itself is subjective and therefore malleable to one’s own biases, interpretation, and liking. This, of course, means to the interpreter of truth that the interpreter of the truth is right, not the truth, and that any other interpretations are not and the truth itself gets quashed. This is a major fallacy, because the truth does not change based on interpretation; it merely says “I AM.” And if the interpretation is far off, consequences inevitably follow. (For example, different interpretations of January 6th may dilute what actually happened and lead us down roads where the problem simply gets left unresolved, but the truth behind the event is still there. I’d love to give other historical examples here, but let’s just say it’s bad to treat a single interpretation of the truth as gospel, especially if it’s from just one source that lacks credibility.)
But we especially in the West (and even in ancient Chinese literature) believe that the truth is objective, with only its interpretations being malleable, which of course creates faults in understanding truth but gives us a way of course-correcting when we misinterpret it. It also gives us the ability to leverage diversity of thought to come to the best interpretation of what the truth actually is. And that’s why we succeed in virtually all areas compared to Russia, which suffers the consequences of relying on only the government’s interpretation of something, nefariously given or not.
Okay, now I’ve become long-winded. Sorry! But just some thoughts.
Wow, your "pithy thoughts" are worthy of another interview, essay or similar imo. You hit the nail on the head with analysis of the truth and post-truth (-fact) on a phylosophical level. Your definition of it ("I AM") is better than that of my friend with PhD in philosophy, who said about truth ~'There is what there is, question remains how we see it'.
Putinist and modern Autocratic ideology and/or (black-) propaganda based in that post truth, postmodern pluralism is best expressed by A. Dugin and borrows from I.Ilyin. Counterforce in "the west" to that weapon is Ayn Rand's school of objectivism. Unfortunately too many "disillusioned westerners" have fallen for seductive fallacies of the former. If "alternative facts" and revisioned history were not so compelling and effective, Russia and other autocracies/theocracies wouldn't spend billions and so much effort targeting "the west" and democratic systems with their info-viruses. Because some westerners are so receptive to it we have a real danger of informationsl zombie-apocalypse on our hands.
I think the best vaccines against this corruption of reason and vision by and for the benefit of our adversaries is correct education and cultural awakening, as ignorance (willful or not) is like an informational HIV leading to internal detractor disease AIDS. There are parts of global societies pretty much immune to the autocratic propaganda viruses, and most of them come from so-called Eastern Europe, at least starting from middle aged population (including me).
And still, because we mostly know the history, Russia and each other here, and our secret services have asessed how dangerous both disinformation, politic and local detractor influence campaigns are, we have put up both informational and legal defenses in our countries unparalelled in the older, traditional "west". I won't go into other aspect about "freedom of speech" in all this, which have been turned into a weapon and apology for genocidal enemies' info-warriors as i've already beaten you in long-windedness here. As i usually do. Because search for the truth (and God forbid justice) is never simple and can't be expressed in concise slogans and soundbites. That's why so many feebler minds hate it and prefer their "own" simpler realities.
Thank you for the interview!
In terms of propaganda and bot farms, it would be interesting to hear Peter's thoughts of what an individual can (should?) do to fight them. For example, in twitter or facebook, there are different approaches, but engaging doesn't seem to work (in the means of a real person reading the conversation, if they don't have vast knowledge of Ukraine or what really happens and read somebody disputing with bot, they might not identify who is a bot or what is the truth); ignoring doesn't seem to work (bots flood the space and it feels like the only "truth" out there is what they say which easily transforms into "we cannot know what's happening"); trying to share more of say "our propaganda" doesn't work (because it is read as propaganda=it's always bad=you're a bot too). Is there a point at all in trying to, say, make our point of view heard?
Should have more views
Lol no it shouldnt. This is a dirty stupid propaganda channel. Bottom of barrel really.
Kyiv! Not Kiev!!
That pseudo-opposition analysis and explaining it to the western audience would be so helpful now.
I have been interested in how to get out messaging effectively for a while and wondered why the US doesn't have a more coherent strategy. I want to be able to spread the truth effectively. I also think it's important to spread the truth about the russian war crimes, this is part of the information war, and wonder how to do that. I haven't thought of propaganda as getting at people's needs but this makes sense. Does a certain culture/nationality have particular needs and why (what goes into conditioning them to this in the 1st place, history etc., what extent is it just universal psychological needs expressed in a specific context...) What would it take to get Americans to care about war crimes in Ukraine? I care just because I'm empathetic.
What would it take to somehow reach the russian population and counter the mindset of apathy?
Дякую за інтервю.
За можливості перекладіть українською для ширшого охоплення.
Для широкого Охолопления is more like it 😂
Very interesting but I found it depressing. It helped me to understand the Russian culture of disinformation or lieing. He who has the power holds the moral high ground and rewrites the moral compass of a country. I guess that's the outcome when a country is run by a corrupt mafia or gangster based regime.
Don't let it depress you, when that 83 year old Babushka, Vera Ivanova, called her Russian countrymen "Svoloch" (сволоч) in that street interview that went viral, she was not wrong.
@@irongron Agreed. I wonder how many mates she has with a similar frame of mind.
Its spelled “Lying”. Listening to these fools will make a racist out of you. I am Ukranian and Russia is the best country in the world. Visit it.
Like the USA!
I can't believe the same Yulia Tymoshenko that ran the Ukrainian Petrol Corporation and led the Orange Revolution got to sit down for an interview with Peter Pomerantsev, truly incredible! /s
me neither! The world is truly a small place
That's not the same person, just someone with an identical name
@@JulsTymoshaI’m totally gonna vote for you in the next elections❤
Yulia is very common name in Ukraine and Timoshenko is very common last name in Ukraine.
@@batacat1 i know i know... my "/s" denotes sarcasm
Interesting about Johns Hopkins, philanthropist who has family name Johns as first name Johns. The “s” confuses Americans, too.
О, згадала …. На темі ботів почала зивати, бо поки чогось важка тема🙈 не зрозуміла
*33 Article Geneve.* Collective responsibility is very harmful
Ukraine might have won the information campaign, though everyone outside the Ukraine bubble just laughed at the silly Ukraine. What counts is the actual battlefield situation. No amount of false information campaign can change that.
And you believe Putin’s 3-day March on Kyiv has been successful? The battlefield is constantly changing, but it’s clear Russia has not achieved their stated goals.
@@msmaryna961 what counts is Russia is winning in battles and economic and politics .
Why kiev...
Because they also have their agenda, which is pro-Urkainian and anti-Russian.
I’m wholly independent and I fully understand why Russia chose to invade and can also understand why Ukraine repels back.
Ultimately, the west is responsible for all this death as it was within their power to avoid it. However, Zelensky has the blood of Ukrainians on his hands as he sold them out, in full knowledge that this would happen. In true Jewish fashion.