BMPCC vs BMPCC4K - I missed the original look!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ต.ค. 2024
- SIGN UP FOR MY FILMMAKING COURSE and learn how to capture stunning images: www.butteryaca.... Use code BUTTERY10 at checkout and get 10% OFF!
GET THE BUTTERY LUTs COLLECTION here: www.butterylut... - GET 15% OFF storewide when you use the code BUTTERY15 at checkout!
SUBSCRIBE to my MAILING LIST and get access to a FREE cinematography training: www.butteryaca...
Incredible music for your videos. Sign up for your free account: share.mscbd.fm/...
GEAR I'M USING: www.amazon.com...
DandO Batteries Bundle USE: MATTEO15 AT CHECKOUT FOR A 15%OFF: www.dandolight...
Smallrig BMPCC4K Cage: www.smallrig.c...
Smallrig Cage for SmallHD Focus: www.smallrig.c...
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn a small commission from qualifying purchases. When you use these links you are supporting my work and my channel. Thank you!
Thanks to my members:
Erica Jacobs-Ware
Noah’s Nostalgia
Queeny Morel
White Prophecy
Flatland Films
Gabriel Broderick
Krm Parysee
Robert Senese
La vision studio
D’ez
Kubitechmultimedia
Samuel Harris
Roosevelt Henry
Bryan Keith
Vidji Studio
The Lion Elite
Caleb Clowe
True Fiction
Golden Hour
Adams Film
P wyld Films
GZ
Shafeeq Nickels
Giuseppe Califano
joemusic931
Fergus Lowrey
Adrien Levy
Damir Samerkhanov
Jeremy Justice
Francesco Theak
Chris Anderson
Blurred Vision Ent
Just Krak
DadidsoStyle
Don Setzer
Adrian Maciejewski
M85 Studios
Carlinhos Franco
True Essence
Steve Chang
Follow me:
www.matteoberto...
/ matteobertolifilmmaker
/ matteobertoli
/ matteobertoli
Get the BUTTERY LUTs here: www.butteryluts.com
Hi! I just got an used original bmpcc for 1/4 the price of a new bmpcc4k.
I've read that to get the best result you need to use resolve (I never used it).
Where do you place the conversion LUT(bm to rec709) in the color grading tab? WB and color correction on the first node, color grading in the second node and the convertion LUT in the last node?
Vincenzo Del Lama check out my latest video, it’s a tutorial! For importing luts in davinci there are tons of tutorial online but it’s extremely simple
@@matteobertoli thx!
what did you used to stabilize the footage? gimbal? steadicam?
The filters on the sensor on the BMPCC4k are more opaque making for more vibrant / separation of colors (even in skin tones) which makes parts look oversaturated when comparing to the old bmpcc. This is a very good thing because you can take away saturation but it is impossible to accurately add more. With a little tweaking by removing color from high luma areas, you can get BMPCC4k to match BMPCC exactly. You can't get BPMCC to match BMPCC4k because the color information simply doesn't exist
7 years later ...still comparison going on which means Blackmagic seriously rethink of the quality maintaining ... even the URSA Mini don't come closer to the Original S16 pocket & the first Blackmagic cinema camera both are equally terrific camera ever made !
Arun R totally agree!
I was going to sell my original BMPCC when I got the 4k version but, keeping them both
Cam B is the original right? It looks better imo.
Edit: Yes!!!
This is why I sold my first BMPCC4K and most likely will sell the second as well. Thanks for the video.
I've found an used original bmpcc in working order for 1/4 the price of the new 4k. And it came with a pancake 9mm Oly lens. Seems like a steal watching this comparison. Also... With a pancake it is actually a pocket cinema camera that you can always take with you. I was hoping that BM would come up with a bmpcc 2.0 with the same form factor while resolving the issues like not having a built-in IR filter, better internal battery and so on, even if it meant losing the 4k.
Personally for me Cam A looks more beautiful. Thanks for this comparison.
Still prefer the BMPCC and BMCC 2.5k I use the BMPCC4K for higher FPS and lowlight. 👍🏽
The sensor on the original was visual magic. So organic, creamy, filmic.
I wish the old BMCC got Braw... I’d buy them again (sold my BMCC 2.5k *cry*)
The first 5 seconds of the cam B I knew it was the BMPCC, I love the camera but I always use it with a stabilizer or a tripod because of the wobble (which gave it a ways instantaneously). I made a test upscaling a 5min clip with gigapixel to 4k and the quality was actually mindblowing! For now it's a pretty long process but in a few years with powerful PC it will make total sense if you need higher resolution.
4:04
Him: "Okay, babe, swipe on the phone so it looks like you're using it... More... Just keep doing it."
Her: "Okay. But you're gonna edit this so I don't look silly, right?"
Him: "Yeah!"
Also him: "Nah."
Life as Matteo's wife.. "look up, look left, look straight, look right, look straight, look left... 😂
Sorry guys but I prefer much better cam A, the p4k. Looks more real and creamy to me. Probably cause I watched it on a 55' 4k screen. I was enjoying the first episode of NOS4AU and watched this test in the middle and found the look of the P4k very similar to whatever highend camera they used for that show. Just my personal opinion.
Jordi Penner high end Sony maybe?
@@Frontigenics I just found out that it was shot on Alexa LF 🤤 (probably the most expensive filmcamera right now)
@@JordiPenner ah very cool!
I agree. You really can't check image quality on your mobile, which is where the majority are looking. I did the same on my 72inch 4K Samsung TV and I totally agree. The P4K looks better in every way.
I have an Eizo 4k monitor, i have old bmpcc , ursa mini 4.6k and bmpcc 4k , actually is no matter of resolution, the images are iper detailed but really i miss too that flavour of film, is the 'pasta' of the images, i like more old one taste, this one is a bit digital to me, not as much as other cameras like sony S or Panny GH, i compensate with filters, but i still feel somenthing miss , if u look ie 4k raw from C200 and Alexa u can tell that.
Throughout the whole video, I felt camera A had the more filmic look and just more desirable. But I also thought I would be one of those "cool TH-cam commenters" who could say that the original is better and technology kills the future, lol!
Upscaled bmpcc is still good looking in 4K. You've done a great job, this is a great experiment. BMPCC is marvelous)
I agree that the original BMPCC has better color overall (the red in the bandana stands out). But the new 4k is a lot more versatile. Both are great depending on what you're shooting.
Glad I'm not the only one who thinks the new BMPC 4K has lost the film look. I have one and way prefer the old one or the BMPCC 2.5. Film look first if possible!
Literally a different sensor. The older sensor, the fairchild sensor, was made to capture light more similarly to how the Arri Alexa does, with its dual gain architecture.
Get dehancer and enjoy the film magic!
I prefer the cam A. I find it has more deatil and renders smother skintones
BigNoseBros I agree. The Bcam/original did have a more dreamy look which could be nicer in some scenes but you likely can get the same look with the Acam/4K in post. The impressive thing is both cameras are fairly comparable at least on TH-cam viewing with a mobile device.
@@whatsupdate watching on a 28" 4k monitor. the fact is if you want to see true 4k you need to export in 8k because of youtubes compression. personally shoot with the a7s and atomos 1080p 60 4.2.2. prores, and always export in 4k for yt, since it still looks amazing.
I suppose the real difference is being able to shoot in slow motion which might be useful if you like speed ramping things or just looking to increase your file sizes
I'm really glad I own both (Plus your LUT) I'd love to see a basic grading video on how you're using your LUT :)
Original BMPCC is way more cinematic! Organic and a real film like quality. I’m selling my BMPCC4k ASAP
Did you sell it ?
Agreed 🙏 I bought 2 of the original bmpcc ❤️
I might get the micro, same sensor better battery and full size ports. I have monitors anyway.
@@thebentzenable are you happy with the decision
@@intrinsiccinema7374 I have a soft spot for the 2 Bmpcc 1k but in these days I shoot spontaneously in nature so I don't use them much. But if I get a job where I can control everything I will use it. These days I take the easy way and shoot SLog 2 with the Sony A7III in 4k. I would use it all the time if it weren't for all the flaws 🙏
It's the sensor. It's all about the sensor size and proportions. That's the answer to why you, and many other pocket users, feel that the Original Pocket is more organic and cinematic. Its sensor is the size of S16 analog film stock used for many independent movies throught the 20th century. We are used to seeing what this type of sensor size and proportions does to a big-screen image, just like it happens with most of the S35 digital sensors. It feels natural to most viewers, even if it's still a digital image. This is also because our grandfathers in imaging science strived to find the most human-like proportions you could use in film stock and they arrived at S35 as a practical answer to the right proportions in relation to quantity of film being used and image detail. Now most prosumers don't give a fuck about cinematic sensor proportions because of 'Bigger is better' mentality that has most camera companies drooling as they sell "Cinema" cameras with FF and M4/3 sensors... Then the same prosumers keep wondering why if their $2k mirrorless cameras have the same DR, Codecs (in this case), Resolution, etc, than a $5k C300 or a $20k Red Camera (I don't mention an Alexa here because that's another kind of witchery happening with the sensor that goes way beyond cinematic S35), why their little camera doesn't hold up?. Well, it's not because it's little or less expensive.... It's because the little camera works with a photography sensor instead of a film-sized one. No fucking wonder it desn't look like film.
Until a good portion of the market that's getting wet all over the FF and M4/3 "cinema" cameras starts asking for film sensors in their products instead of more resolution and DR we won't get this gap between cinematic images and photography video trying to be cinematic to close.
The closer we got to this was the BMPCCHD which is definitely way ahead of its time and so dangerous to the camera market BM didn't make the 4k with a film sensor...
Well, it looks like some things have changed since I made this comment... God bless Blackmagic Design and long live the S35 Pocket 6K.
At first, I liked Cam A but I watched it again and I definitely do like the more blooming highlight and smooth skin tones from Cam B. They both look great and it doesn’t make me think any differently about my BMPCC 4K. Cam A still looks great but looking really close at certain details, Cam B does have a creamier look. Love this comparison!
Cam B definitely the original 2.5 K Cinema
honestly the Bmpcc has the best colors and is closest to the look of celluloid
Agreed
Facts.
Get dehancer and it will make the 4k look like real film
Wow, that's amazing how you can make the colors from old pocket looks good! I only got a nasty ugly crappy colors from both bmcc and bmpcc, especially in overcast skies scenarios.
Good job, makes me thinking of buying some cheap bmcc.
Sometimes I think that the "lack" of sharpness at the original bmpcc images could help to add some filmic felling.
The old BMPCC is still entirely usable as long as you upscale it to 4K.
Since it records 4:4:4 RAW, you actually get 4K Chroma resolution when converted to the format of TH-cam's 4K 4:2:0.
I.e. 4K 4:2:0 can be converted into 1080p 4:4:4, and vice versa -- you do get the Chroma but you don't get the same Luma information, however you actually save a lot more of it in 4K due to the higher bitrate.
Zangeef Fangsteen i don’t see any point in shooting 4k. Just shot a feature film in 2k and looks fantastic!
No Bayer sensor can record 4:4:4 natively.
@@innstikk You are confused and don't know how this works. Bayer sensor cameras can [potentially] record 4:4:4:4 which is non-YUV RAW, capturing a discrete value for each of the four pixels in the CFA. They can also record some form of YCbCr partial debayering, I.e. 4:4:4 but with a Green ratio (due to the RED patent)
I miss my bmpcc, and I have two in the other room♥️ I hope that the sensor will be fixed and put in future bmpcc's.
Hi Matteo. Thank you very much for the video! I have BMPCC OG and BMPCC4k. Could you do a tutorial on how to mach the colors of the two cameras? I also use Davinci Resolve. Thank you very much and keep making these videos!
I was thinking about buying the Sony A7 and I have the Gh4.
Instead I bought a bearly used BMPCC fraction of the cost. Best investment I can ever have done.
I've already rigged it out. I'm also using the metabones speedbooster and Nikon lenses which is really cool and some native lenses. My next investment will be a nice monitor and I'm hoping the Ninja V we'll work with it I was told that the Free World monitors work with it.
I've also invested in a small rig with the Sony battery backup.
The original pocket Cinema is treasure you just have to learn a little bit of patience with it.
I still hesitated at the first sample, but I no longer doubted it B is orig.BMPCC :-D Less contrasting in midtones and colors, and greater dynamic range, And all owners of BMPC4K can get angry, but it is. (I had a new BMPCC 4K a week and returned it) Just if you can do it with your old pocket, it will give you a better look than the new pocket.
As a great addition to my older BM cameras I have a GH5 for speed documentary "run and shoot" (excellent stabilization, good battery, good sound, low bitrate codec for long shoots, articulating screen etc) the new pocket4k can't give me this. if I want a modern look I take comfortable GH5, if i want a cinema look picture i take old Pocket or Micro for slowmo
beg to differ, the pocket 4K has done me well, more-so than the GH5. GH5 is definitely good for run and gun ease, but if you want true cinematic 4K 60 fps under $8,000, the pocket 4K is your best bet. Dynamic range and color science is too damn good. Bmpcc original definitely has a unique flatter/green look than the 4K's more magenta/orange toned look, but both can be manipulated in post to look the same. Greater dynamic range? Don't think so.
The Bmpcc was a beast of its time, but there is no way it surpasses the innovations in the 4K...
@@TheGuym619 you're right
I agree on original for more cinematic footage!
Fairchild Sensor!
The original is simply different. It’s hard to tell here on TH-cam, and I also match them, but out of the camera the texture and look of the original is simply unique. Unique doesn’t necessarily means always better but to me looks a lot more like an Alexa
when i'm reading "greater dynamic range" i cannot read the rest of your comment , because you cannot spot the difference between 2 different dynamic range ,the p4k is clearly greater in term of dynamic range
I see what you mean. I ended up picking cam b (bmcc) too. Something more natural and "organic" about it
each has its own enchanting image .... both are beautiful
I really miss the original look of the Bmpcc and BMCC 2.5k It really gives the real film look
With dehancer you can make the 4k better film looking footage!
lol it was super close, the only thing that gave it away for me was the micro jitters on cam b
Very happy to get the original bmpcc + Speedbooster from metabones for 500$. So worth it, even if it's not 4k or lacks slow motion.
I definitely wouldn't do that. Get the Pocket 4k. It has many benefits. The BMPCC will definitely lack in low light
BMPCC w/ a speed booster is just fine in low light. I shoot with it all the time. Plus you should always have proper lighting when doing projects
True but I basically got the original for 250 bucks, then added the speed booster to use my Nikon glass. The pocket 4K is just a bit more expensive, 1300$ without any adapter
That was a great deal, where did you find it?
I got it from Craigslist.
Great comparison could I ask which lenses you used for the caparison please? Thanks Glenn
I still use my bmpcc along with my 4k and they both look identical when I put my bmpcc on gen4 in post. I still love the original because of its film gradient look
I have classic BMPCC, but why in this video is Cam B the picture so choppy?
Nicely done.
Did you sharpen or do anything to the BMPCC footage after upscaling it?
Nope nothing!
got 3 old ones and one 4k... for FILM only old ones matters... lovely understateed beasts
Man! ... thought I was crazy buying 4 originals over the years. Always had a feeling version 1 may end up being a classic ... we shall see?
May even buy the micro aswell 😃
Hi. Please would you recommend the old ones as B cams for shooting weddings?
I'm a BMPCC 4k user, and I'm here because I've just exchanged my Olympus OMD E10 MIII to a BMCC 2.5k camera and I'm contemplating whether I should be rigging it out, since it's pretty old. But I love the look of this camera. The dynamic range is stupendously great, and difference in resolution is negligent at best. Square form factor makes it comfortable to shoot handheld, but it does need a battery solution (all cine cams do) and external monitor would be nice.
Preferred the P4k in every shot. It does saturate browns in a way that needs some toning down. Noticed this in my head to head vs. Alexa.
I don't see why those little color differences are important since you can grade it in post to make it look exactly the way you want...
when you say bmpcc was upscaled to 4k, do you mean 3840x2160 ultra hd?
Surprisingly cam A looked nice in my opinion. I will refrain from using the word better because honestly they both look good. I think it might be nice to be able to answer "yes" when clients ask if you can shoot in 4k, as they often do. Great comparison. Thank you for making this video.
do you two separate tripods for both cams? i love how u have them framed perfectly
both handheld
YES you are correct the tinting an oscillation of tints in the 4k is annoying to look at. the BMPCC is more one tone of skin and is more pleasing. 4k looks to be maybe a sony sensor they have that tendancy sometimes going weird magenta tints and greens in skin very subtle but need a decent set of LUTs to get around. cheers.
I knew it. The bmpcc was the B because of little différence in the Black area. Just a little milky but i like it. Happy to get this caméra with old Lens it's Just crazy and Amazing
You used a variable nd to take off the digital look instead of using the black pro mist for it or did you have another reason for using the variable nd???
Camera B looks digitally sharpened and overly vibrant. Really clear on her headband. (Cool headband also)
I am late to the party here, but I really would like to know which camera is which?
People seem pretty evenly split on their guesses, though many appear to be very certain...
Please let me know?
Camera A has a lower contrast which I find better and just feels more balanced...
Is there a reason why cam B footage is more "shaky"? Does the bmpcc not have image stabilization?
By the way, I preferred Cam A. Looks more "cinematic" and sharp. I recently purchased the bmpcc and will be using it to shoot music videos. But it is the cinematic look I am going for, maybe the 4K would have been a better choice. Any particular lens you or other users would recommend?
Well stated Matteo. I still use the original BMPCC for my personal projects and for gimbal work on the Zhiyun Crane 2 because it is so light.
Which sd card are you using, I wanted to buy 2019 and everyone is saying that sandisk no longer supports bmpcc !
@@professionelguide1097 I don't use the new 4K, I still shoot on the original BMPCC and I use Sandisk.
what lens did you use friend?
Thanks for the comparison, i'll go Cam A for the skin render, smoother more natural.
Why would you upscale the BMPCC, wouldnt you lose some of the organic look?? She looked more tan in cam A
Donald Austin you don’t. She does look more tan because as I said in the description the BMPCC4K tends to make your skin tone more brown
@@matteobertoli You should do a test comparing both cameras in 1080p just out of curiosity
There has been loads of comments flying about which is true. The new BMPCC4k just don't compare to the old BMCC or pocket. Uses a sony sensor and it's high on the highlights due to pixel dimension size - therefore the filmic look has more or less gone from the 4k. I prefer the old pocket regardless of the iso features in low light and sharpness. It's nothing to do with grading, set design etc. Thats what an ignorant pro (who by saying this isn't btw) would tell an amateur. The real pros will tell the difference. I've tested myself and trust me, the BMPC4K is nothing like it's previous model. It's great but people who want film regardless of great grading, grain techniques will suffer the original magic look. Sometimes perfect is not for what you want....they gone a new direction and set a benchmark butty URSA AND PRODUCTION 4K gives me better results. I'm gutted as I waited for this. Great for my documentaries.
They are awfully close together. I am happy with my P4K.
That's why I'm really happy that I found the original for 1/4 the price of the 4k
How do you shoot CDNG and set the sharpness on the original BMPCC?
Do you still feel this way now that you believe the 6k is the best modern camera you can buy?
Great comparison! The original (Cam B) looks a little more contrasty in the shadows, probably just a little less dynamic range. The Super Takumar at 1:36 looks amazing! I'm looking for a clean one for my next lens. Thanks for making these videos!
Conrad Know-How i agree. The lens is a 24mm canon fd tho :)
@@matteobertoli Huh, the swirly background (the leaves on the left) made me think of your favorite lens.
Will the Metabones Speed Booster Ultra 0.71x Adapter for Nikon G Lens to Micro Four Thirds-Mount Camera work on both BMPCC and BMPCC 4K?
I liked A better but looked very close to each other. Really 1080p is all I'll ever need either way.
I meant to ask did the color science version 4 make the bmpcc a little easier to color grade?
Matteo, do you think original pocket has more DR than 4k?? or the same??
I chose Cam A , from the first 10 seconds.
The highlights rolloff is nowhere close between these two cameras.
I strongly feel that you are mistaken.
This is absolutely useful! Thank you Matteo. May I please ask...what are your render settings when exporting your Original BMPCC projects?
I miss my bmpcc. I may have to get another one!
It’s subtle, but the bmpcc has slightly lifted blacks and a bit softer details. A very similar look could be accomplished on the 4K with a simple 1/8 Black Pro Mist filter on the lens, and then you’ve still got all the advantages of that camera at your disposal.
From TH-cam yes. But trust me when you check the footage out of the camera the original Pocket is much better.
I believe you. I’ve always thought the original bmpcc in general produces a more organic and filmic look than the 4K. The 4K is more digital looking, which is typical of higher resolution sensors. I’m a recent convert to the Tiffen Pro Mist filters and you should really try them out if you haven’t yet and are lamenting the less filmic look of your bmpcc4k.
@@matteobertoli Completely agree,!
Or dehancer
Color goes to the OG cam b, but the 4k has an active mount and the image stabilization definitely makes the handheld shots better, and I think a little tweaking and mabe pull the saturation a little back on the 4k, you could match them reasonably well. They both look great to be honest. The OG pocket and the godfather BMCC 2.5k were both way ahead of their time. I still rock the 2.5k, and I love the images I can get out of it. I do want a 4k though, not due the increases resolution, I don't really care about 4k most of the time, but the active mount, BRAW and high frame rate options are what appeal to me. I'd say my next camera will either be a pocket 4k or maybe if I wait long enough, it's equivalent replacement. I would love to see BMD come out with a pocket 4k, that has a bigger pixel pitch and also a dual gain Fairchild sensor like they had in the older models. There is something about that sensor that a lot of us love. They could even do multiple versions of the same camera like panasonic does. Them we could have the BMPCC-FP 4k. Wouldn't that be cool. Good comparison video, thanks for that.
I wish they updated the Original bmpcc to the bmpcc 4k mini or something. The design of the original bmpcc is just amazing and i wish blackmagic still sold the original.
I felt the B cam was the little one just because it was more shaky and the ergonomics/size was making you les stable, but the image is nearly identical, if equally stabilized would never tell. nice video, What lens was used for this test? mostly wide open?
Does the FD to MFT Speed booster mount ok on the original BMPCC? I thought you could only use the BMPCC specific Speed boosters.
Mr Zarlton works great
@@matteobertoli Great, thanks!
Hey Matteo, great comparison. How does the DR compare between the two? I'd imagine it's pretty close, right?
Nayword Productions yeah pretty much the same!
This is nice to see a comparison but some more variety of types of shots would be cool to see! Like maybe some close ups vs distant landscape shots etc
loved this video. just started using the pocket 4k and your buttery lut. i was thinking of getting a second pocket 4k or maybe the original bmpcc. would you go for a second pocket 4k or go for a original bmpcc for b roll?
If you are starting out get the BMPCC 4K and save yourself all the headaches and workarounds.
Motion cadence. Very different between the two cameras. Old Pocket looks like 16mm movement.
I've heard this term motion cadence before. What does it actually mean?
@@FKfilmphotography There's debate, but in general it means the "flicker" between frames of 24p footage, and how it makes moving objects look. To me, original BMPCC footage looks a bit more, say "flicker-y", or more like 16mm film. But that's more of a "vintage" look, and the modern look is cleaner and a little smoother.
It is funny, this "16mm movement" is camera shakes because bmpcc is tiny vs bmpcc4k, simple phisics. "ART" "organic" BS
Nice work! Did you use the native iso 800 on the original bmpcc?
Hi, how can I render my Videos , to get high quality after uploading on TH-cam??. I've heard I need to use HANDBRAKE software. but what the settings I need to use???
Айдын Куангалиев i only use davinci and I export prores lt. That’s about it
I told you mate. I was correct. Thanka for making this comparison for me. Everyone look at this video carefully. It's lost its magic look.
It looks to me there is a bit more micro jitter or camera shake on camera B. Is there anything that would be causing this? Or am I just crazy? Thanks!
yep, simply cause the original pocket weigh less than my phone :)
@@matteobertoli Got ya! Thanks
Bmpcc and bmpcc HD is it the same ?
I like it honestly, I was never a fan of the original pocket camera but you might have made me a fan . It’s also hard to tell the difference.
I still thinking that bmpcc4k still better overall
god barely.. keep in mind the original bmpcc was"uprezed" to 4k from 1080. You lose quality doing that
@@allinthemind2006 seriously? So it's better to upload in 1080p for youtube? I thought that when uploading in 4k the bigger file size would result in better quality overall after uploading
Vincenzo Del Lama Vincenzo Del Lama no you misunderstood. im saying they scaled up the original 1080 pocket footage to 4k. that diminishes resolution by half and yet the original still looks just as good.
@@allinthemind2006 I still don't understand... Your talking about the native res right? Not that upscaling lowers the final quality?
Interesting, thanks. Could you make a video showing the brown skin tone problem of the BMPCC 4k?
love this camera. my first camera! great video! can you please tell me the last firmware you updated/ was made available for the bmpcc
Does the OG one still eat thru storage or did it get updated in any way
BMD is awesome! Form factor is often a challenge but the look is the standard to beat, imho! Great video, as usual, Matteo!
Cam B is good old BMPCC for sure, the narrower angle of view just gave it out. other than that , they look all most the same!
Paul Shen cam B is the pocket 4k 😂
If you'd done it with a tripod, I would've had some doubt, but I'd recognise the micro-jitters of the BMPCC anywhere.. I get the point though. It looks fucking fantastic.
Thanks! BMPCC 4k is slightly better, but to me it is not enough for an upgrade (considering size and battery hoarding (again!)). Will be interesting to see how Sigma fp fares...
Great Comparison. However, I would never paired BM with Canon L series. Tried it once. Didnt like it at all. But thats just me.
Great comparison! Do you recommend using a VAF + IR filter for the original pocket?
nice work!! what do you use to edit these BMPCC4k videos?
SoaR Fameful thanks, davinci
Matteo Bertoli Visuals sweet! also u should do low light tests with the bmpcc4k! (:
I agree. :D Hey bro, I'm waiting patiently for you to find the time to reengineer your LUT for Fujifilm :D I feel from a Fuji to have an Arri look shouldn't be that hard and i think FLOG needs more love. Great video on these 2 legendary cameras, you are always the one i watch right before purchasing. Also at @ 4:17 if you add contrast to the mids and a layer of fine film grain on the bmpcc footage it would look exactly the same in my opinion :D So Close.
Which sd card are you using in the original bmpcc ?
Professionel Guide just a regular 64gb sandisk 95mb
Angelbird makes cards specifically for the original BMPCC and Micro
i 've both and i can say to the World: Sooca!!
BMPCC (1080) гораздо лучше чем 4К!
у неё изображение мягче, приятней, она ближе к киношной!
а 4К снимает как обычные фотоаппараты DSLR, как обычное видео, ничего приятного!
резкость и пиксельность не всегда хорошо!
Абсолютно! Не один фотоаппарат современные не даст такое картину. К черту это 4к. Там нет вкуса