Aryan Migration: Who are our ancestors, really?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ก.พ. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 6K

  • @alexyuarayan1212
    @alexyuarayan1212 5 ปีที่แล้ว +924

    You are right,In Thailand ,we accept language ,culture,tradition from ancient India.

    • @RohitYadav-hg7mq
      @RohitYadav-hg7mq 4 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      Love from India.

    • @manikandanb5111
      @manikandanb5111 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      There is no ancient india. Could you plz tell me the year of ancient india that you are telling

    • @Rajkumar-ul7ko
      @Rajkumar-ul7ko 4 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      @@manikandanb5111 it may be subcontinent of india.

    • @Nirmala1969
      @Nirmala1969 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@manikandanb5111 . its before the arrival of jews to India . say 2nd, 3rd, 4th BCE

    • @Nirmala1969
      @Nirmala1969 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@manikandanb5111 : those days India was known as naavalan theevu

  • @avavav3776
    @avavav3776 5 ปีที่แล้ว +318

    I am a Half Assamese and Half Bihari who lived in Andhra+ Rajasthan+West Bengal and married a Keralite.

    • @Hashtags-OMG
      @Hashtags-OMG 5 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      കൊച്ചിന്റെ വിധി അല്ലപിന്നെ😁

    • @samriddhimondal2096
      @samriddhimondal2096 3 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      U are a true indian🤣🤣🤣

    • @theblissedcorner1728
      @theblissedcorner1728 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I m also an Assamese ❤️ nice too meet an Assamese too

    • @asmityadav4216
      @asmityadav4216 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Your dad is/was in the armed forces??

    • @mohdrahilkhan9690
      @mohdrahilkhan9690 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      🤣🤣🤣

  • @rini7317
    @rini7317 4 ปีที่แล้ว +204

    In the end all I can say that ,“ We Indians are just mixtures ”.....

    • @lakshmiram2935
      @lakshmiram2935 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Just go see dna results of majority of tamils, we are not your mixtures

    • @georgefrancisjolly5762
      @georgefrancisjolly5762 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes

    • @arindambose9863
      @arindambose9863 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Wrong genetically all indian in the Indian subcontinent even the pastun have the same dna

    • @arindambose9863
      @arindambose9863 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @Jhenkar R maybe but dravidian and aryans origined In indian subcontinent

    • @arindambose9863
      @arindambose9863 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @Jhenkar R thats bullshit this shows your lack of knowledge 😒 Hinduism was born in indus valley civilization and aryans migrated from indian subcontinent to rest of Europe and Central asia the r1a genes started Indian subcontinent talking about dravidian they were always present over here no one came from outside till the maurya time when Greeks had come. Aryan invasion theory is myth by britishers to to show we are a inferior people

  • @rohanthan
    @rohanthan 4 ปีที่แล้ว +130

    I read quite a bit of the scientific work on DNA out there and let me do a brave attempt to simplify and summarize. There were always migrations and even all ethnic groups that make up Indians came from somewhere (starting with Africa).From what I understood from these DNA studies of countries where IE languages have spread the following DNA clusters were the main building blocks for the populations:
    1.North and South Indians (in varying proportions)= Ancient Ancestral South Indians (South Asian hunter gatherers)+ Iranian Farmers+ Yamnaya steppe pastoralists+ miscellaneous (later invasions and migrations)
    2. Modern Iranians= Iranian Farmers+Anatolian farmers+ Yamnaya steppe pastoralists+miscellaneous (later invasions and migrations)
    3. Modern Europeans= European hunter gatherers+ Anatolian farmers+ Yamnaya steppe pastoralists+ miscellaneous (later invasions and migrations)
    You can see the common thread here for all three categories are Yamnaya steppe pastoralists. So may not be not too difficult to make an inference on who were the original speakers of proto-Indo-European language.

    • @testprofile1840
      @testprofile1840 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@declanharp9633 hi could you please share which paper are you talking about I too want to know about it thx for sharing in advance

    •  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Read "David Reich" Harvard Study on South Asians.
      Also Read a 2009 paper by some Indian authors in a reputed Intl Journal which challenged the Aryan migration theory by telling you about the findings of more diversity of R1a in India and said Indian version seems to be older. Although David Reich explains it now (last decade saw a boom in genomic studies). Also the scholarship right now is heavily skewed towards proving that aryan invasion happened and it probably happened. We need more archeological findings to clarify or refute claims. Also there is a slim chance that the genomic studies reveal something which renders the recent gene studies wrow, although chances are extremely slim. Again David Reich also talks about this standalone 2009 paper by Indian authors and receives it as legitimate challenge to Aryan invasion theory but refuses it by saying that now they have collected more data and genealogy has grown by many folds.

    • @kaushiksaikadali7460
      @kaushiksaikadali7460 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@declanharp9633 the yamnaya people are generalized here. There were many migrations since Yamnaya culture, and there's history from Bactrian culture and Central Asian cultures. Yamnaya is just the proto-Indo-European start point, however, there was a culture that was completely in Central Asia after that, which then migrated to other places South, Southwest, East and West. They're like almost a millennia apart, and have developed characteristics than the original Yamnaya people. That probably gives us where the R1a comes from, Central Asian Iranian tribes were known to be migrating to farther places even until 5th century AD, to as west as Iberian peninsula and as North as modern day Baltic Sea. Could be that heavy intermixing in the dark ages caused R1a to spread in Europe, while it was generally Asian.

    • @adyrockstarb
      @adyrockstarb 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thank you for this information. Interesting and captivating

    • @TruthSeeker69921
      @TruthSeeker69921 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Whatever in sanskrit is aryan's making.. they were invaders with horses came to north india.. they created sanskrit, vedic system, caste system by making themselves as brahmins of the highest hierarchy.. the true indigenous ppl are the dravidians(tamils) likely originated from harappa civilisation at the lost river of sarawathy.. there is even an ancient tamil city of Harappa in pakistan.. u guys can google and see.. but indian government is covering up because mostly are aryans and they will nvr acknowledge tamil as the oldest spoken language in the world.. soon links to indus pictograph are being decrypted using spoken Tamil.. incredible breakthrough.. that would bring back glory to Tamils whom were suppressed by the aryans for centuries till today.. so dont believe onto whatever the aryans made.. they are the crook brahmins plundered india's wealth and followed by british.. the original proto-shiva seal found in harappa civilisation in a meditative state can be directly linked to south india... incredibly the harappa civilisation emphasised on drainage system, fertility, equility, animal rights, self and social well being plus also meditation.. all these with emphasise to water can be seen in our Tamil culture.. the aryan's are from mesopotamian blood where they believed in gods, kings, pyramids, zigurats, temples, hierarchy totally different from harappa civilisation where there was not even weapons or war.. that is the ultimate shiva's teaching brought over by the dravidians to south india.. aryan mixed and destroyed most of the authentic Tamil teachings.. by right dravidians dont even pray during their civilisation, they only meditate because they have already came to realisation thousands of years ago.. om namah shivaya

  • @a.bharadwaja7224
    @a.bharadwaja7224 6 ปีที่แล้ว +65

    Indians react wild on this subject. Almost all countries have migrations and invasions in the past. But no one cares like we do. Most of the western countries have no original roots. And they don't mind who their ancestors are. They know that was in the past and not going to help anyway now. They are practical people. Why cant we do that. We don't want to come out of this same old dispute and fighting over the very issue . It is not going to help anyone , in fact it creates more conflict. We all love our country. It doesn't mean we fight over the issues on dispute. If you think we were the victims because of this migration/ invasion we should try to rectify it. At least work towards it. Conveniently , we blame politicians or Westerners . They left us ages ago. Irony is, given a chance majority of us would love to migrate to western countries now . Why is this hypocrisy? We are so energetic to fight over the " ANCESTERS HISTORY" but cant stand up and talk firmly with a politician. Cant blast a corrupted officer. Cant follow basic rules which save many people from RTA. Being a good citizen is far more important than anything.

    • @anilbiz8921
      @anilbiz8921 6 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      No one has original roots ...Man migrated and moved ever since he appeared on the evolutionary ladder a bout 1 million years ago. We are all human beings divided by dogmatic and narrow minded religions, caste,race and language divide. Let's respect that and unite on a common sentiment which binds us all- We all feel love for our dear ones, we eat food, feel sorrow and pleasure. It's these qualities that matter. Not our kula and shiila.

    • @Sankara.sankara
      @Sankara.sankara 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      A.Bharadwaja good baby

    • @calumhogan6933
      @calumhogan6933 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@anilbiz8921 we all come from ethiopia

    • @curcumin417
      @curcumin417 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Because of inferiority complex based on color and caste.

    • @kollurubharathsimha539
      @kollurubharathsimha539 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's not issue of ancestry it's issue of looking down on us and dividing us

  • @Kumark-qf1mk
    @Kumark-qf1mk 6 ปีที่แล้ว +397

    What the hell . Why so much anger? It is true. INDIANS ARE MIXED RACE. Full stop.

    • @Kumark-qf1mk
      @Kumark-qf1mk 6 ปีที่แล้ว +81

      I don’t think you deserve a reply mate.

    • @Mdavis12002
      @Mdavis12002 6 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Just like Hispanics/Latin people

    • @anilbiz8921
      @anilbiz8921 6 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Bravo..Let's think and behave as Indians first and also as universal human beings.India has been the most tolerant place and people who gave refuge to all persecuted people. Let's not loose this quality that makes this nation great. It will surely rise again

    • @fin3420
      @fin3420 6 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Kush k ...people now a days dont need reason to hate each other. Animals are so much better than hate filled humans.

    • @NisCho754
      @NisCho754 6 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      kush k bro your answer to this @Sainath Kadam was perfect, insulting someone’s mother shows that this guy certainly doesn’t come from a family with good background...

  • @kishorekannappan105
    @kishorekannappan105 4 ปีที่แล้ว +57

    You have forget to say that the dna obtained from rakhigarhi nearly matches to the dna of irullar caste in Tamil Nadu.

    • @naiyayika
      @naiyayika 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      LMFAO
      Incorrect. Vedic Sanskrit is first attested around 1400 BCE, this is confirmed by contemporaneous Mittani Aryan. The earliest Tamil literature is from only 300 BCE. On the other hand, Hittite is attested as early as 1700 BCE, and Mycenaean Greek as early as Vedic Sanskrit. Tamil doesn't even begin to compare in terms of the date of earliest attestation.
      BTW, do you know The oldest grammar form of Tamil itself has Sanskrit Name and first chairman of Sangam, Agastya too has a Sanskrit name?
      Even if I take this argument that 90% of Sanskrit words have Tamil origin then will you pl enlighten how despite being non Indian Sanskrit did had such origin for max words.
      Where the Tamils of those days sending packets of words to Europe with Pegion?

    • @gloriouspurpose4532
      @gloriouspurpose4532 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @@naiyayika sanskrit not even a language brother!
      Adi tamil letters are found in indus valley civilization area.
      Sanskrit is only a mixture of languages.
      Tamil has many synonyms for a single word.
      Tamil can speaked fluently and beautifully without your sanskirit.

    • @mithun3313
      @mithun3313 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@naiyayika Pls do know to use google.. dna findings from harappan civilisation matches with todays south indian population.. which proves aryan immigration.. plus sanskrit is a combination of languages from devanagiri script.. u guys just always wanted to bring our history down since we have not got much evidences because its too old.. we lost it.. yeah thats because of several several invasions.. we people are so innocent and pity is we believed aryan stories.. thats why starting from bcci till last govt table aryans are holding powers..😏

    • @jennyjames2673
      @jennyjames2673 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@gloriouspurpose4532 lol stfu you are glorifying your own sh*t language

    • @snehanath1705
      @snehanath1705 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@gloriouspurpose4532 From where did u get this information....

  • @nilaypatel6770
    @nilaypatel6770 4 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    Basically, First Human Was Started Migrating from Africa Before 2 Lakh Years, We human still Migrating..
    But, Skin Colour and Face Structure changes according to Weather & Food & Mixing of jeans,

    • @65gregw
      @65gregw 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      :-):-):-) I understand this is a joke?

    • @kon.kartik
      @kon.kartik 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Jeans👖😂

    • @G.O.Dnotfound
      @G.O.Dnotfound 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Ya especially levis affects face structure

  • @nandav529
    @nandav529 5 ปีที่แล้ว +315

    History can be said in thousand way. This is also one of the story...
    The real fact is you will never know the truth

    • @onion4550
      @onion4550 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      That last bit hit too close to home man.

    • @harry9238
      @harry9238 5 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      So why south Indians are more similar to Africans???
      And why north Indians are more similar to Iranians, Egyptians and Europeans???
      Why Mongolians are more similar to Chinese , Koreans and Japanese ??? Than Europeans??
      This is History Science
      And that story must reveal

    • @anmoltiwary1043
      @anmoltiwary1043 5 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      This is what the leftists do....
      They take a research....a true research...
      They tell you some facts....
      And in their explaination, they manipulate the facts according to suit their own narrative....
      So the narration transforms from factual explaination, to manipulated statements.
      I have read the report, i even had a chat with Vasant Shinde, the head of the archeological research in Rakhigarhi...and also Dr. Niraj Rai, the researcher in the Rakhigarhi DNA report which this guy was talking about...
      I would ask all the viewers to go through this before believing this bullshit.
      Read what the experts who did the research has to say about this...and not these pathetic idiots. Or Read the report yourself.
      theprint.in/talk-point/does-rakhigarhi-skeleton-dna-confirm-dravidian-ancestry-or-reignite-aryan-invasion-debate/110576/
      theprint.in/culture/archeologist-who-found-4500-yr-old-skeletons-in-haryana-doesnt-buy-aryan-invasion-theory/113852/

    • @lightr2187
      @lightr2187 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Then what you believe is truth?

    • @lightr2187
      @lightr2187 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Hare Krishna c'mon its bcoz indians are all mixed and moved to each other regions as a north and south indians have developed alot of similarties. And some africans group also migrated to south india later mixed with dravidian.

  • @Vijay_Ganesh
    @Vijay_Ganesh 5 ปีที่แล้ว +337

    Dig deeper into "keezhadi" & most probably all the history & research may have to be rewritten...

    • @ForthDimensional
      @ForthDimensional 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      In madurai??

    • @Vijay_Ganesh
      @Vijay_Ganesh 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Yes.

    • @deepblue3682
      @deepblue3682 5 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Keezhadi is from BC200, even later than Asoka of Mauryan empire. Adichanallor of tirunalveli is earlier than keezhadi, but thats just a grave.

    • @lifenrose9972
      @lifenrose9972 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      👍👍👍

    • @kbee225
      @kbee225 5 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@deepblue3682 please do your research. Keezhadi is dated to 6th century BC.

  • @HINDU-t7v
    @HINDU-t7v 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    *its not a aryan invasion*
    _Its a migration_
    There is no orginal inhabitants of subcontinent all come from outside whether south africans or white aryans

  • @wezzuh2482
    @wezzuh2482 5 ปีที่แล้ว +116

    Amazing that linguists proposed this centuries ago, through nothing but a comparative analysis of language. And now modern genetics confirm it.

    • @chrisnewbury3793
      @chrisnewbury3793 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      And yet most establishment linguists today are in collective denial about such things, along with the rest of Academia. Of course, I believe the people who control such institutions, have known this all along.

    • @thsht1677
      @thsht1677 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Where did linguists suggest that? And which sources they used for comparison? Can you please source for this statement, would love to learn.

    • @wezzuh2482
      @wezzuh2482 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@thsht1677 The hypothesis that some of the languages of India, Iran and the Languages of Europe descend from a common ancestor was first proposed by WIllim jones in the eighteenth century. The Hypothesis has been refined ever since

    • @robinchettri6966
      @robinchettri6966 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@wezzuh2482 I also think that Sanskrit and Latin had the same ancestor at some point. Many words sound similar in both languages. Take this sentence for example; My name is ______.
      Meum nomen est ______(Latin),
      Mama nama _______ asti (Sanskrit).
      They did have a common ancestor and no one can convince me otherwise.

    • @wezzuh2482
      @wezzuh2482 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@robinchettri6966 yes they undoubtedly did. This is consensus among linguists too.

  • @bettyboossister3918
    @bettyboossister3918 6 ปีที่แล้ว +169

    All I know is that I'm HUMAN....That's all that matters...

    • @convadodeltaro1997
      @convadodeltaro1997 5 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      You are very naïve. Too naïve for the real world.

    • @razorphil4973
      @razorphil4973 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      convado deltaro19 i feel u and can understand ur comment.

    • @littleworld9632
      @littleworld9632 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Koko

    • @Sunny-wf4cq
      @Sunny-wf4cq 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Good. Then never get into religious matters

    • @bettyboossister3918
      @bettyboossister3918 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Eternal President Kim il Sung Thank You

  • @sharann3482
    @sharann3482 6 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    The comment section is really funny to read
    One sight is suggesting that this video (wich is based on a pre-reviewed study) is too pro South Indians and its (study) mentioning that the North Indians have “Aryan“ DNA and south Asian DNA, makes it for that site somehow a fake scientific paper.
    Than we have this other site that is triggered by the fact that their ancestors were Hunters and gatherers and was the Civilization who builded the Indus Valley Civilization. They also say it’s a too pro North Indian video/study. So they conclude that this study has to be fake as well.
    Than there’s a group wich is triggered that not all of their ancestors was mentioned (in my opinion understandable) but they than also reject the study.
    Than the funniest group whose complete world view breaks down in seconds just because the Aryan Migration theory has quint essence of truth.
    And the last group the reasoners who knows what a pre-reviewed study is and how difficult it is in our scientific world to have a fake paper surviving.
    Listen you can criticize the paper no question but if you want to disprove it you have to do your own research, Wright a paper, pre- reviewed it, publish it and get famous (well atleast among Indians for sure).

  • @MrPankajnautiyal
    @MrPankajnautiyal 6 ปีที่แล้ว +427

    He started with probably and ended with confirmed... Wow.

    • @AbhishekSharma-ce2lh
      @AbhishekSharma-ce2lh 6 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      These kind of clown are two clues ... their grandparents were greedy of prosperity and money. They wanted to be prosperous like brahmin, priest .so they joined Christianity and became pastors of base less religion.. but still useless..

    • @nirwantomar1238
      @nirwantomar1238 5 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      I think you haven't listened to the first 5 second of this video, 902 people research team have come to this conclusion. Not this guy😀

    • @AbhishekSharma-ce2lh
      @AbhishekSharma-ce2lh 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@balakumart562 wait and watch for the revival of ancient technology of india ...

    • @ChetanSharma-gw5lg
      @ChetanSharma-gw5lg 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Probably he is an alien. Like and confirm 902 people.

    • @anurag23611
      @anurag23611 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      It's still a very misleading and inaccurate video. Nothing is confirmed just because he said it's confirmed.

  • @explorerelka
    @explorerelka 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    "The Scholars did not have DNA samples from the Indus Valley Civilization, but they did take samples from individuals who SEEMED like they were PROBABLY from there". And we Indians are supposed to take this assumption as scientific evidence of our own origins? The Aryan Invasion theory itself is long debunked. When are we Indians going to have our own World class institutions that studies ancient history, archaeology, ethnology, anthropology in a scientific manner? This would've been the most logical thing in an ancient civilisation such as ours.

    • @MM-dh3wr
      @MM-dh3wr 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      True history is coming soon with evidence; History has been changed from Guptas period; PURANAS were created to hide the history. Kashmir issue is making us disprove aryan invasion theory.
      Everything is written down and things are streamlined now. AIT is debunked by 5% people.

    • @azadpathak7895
      @azadpathak7895 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@MM-dh3wr AIT is disapproved by more than 1 billion people in India. It's already 14.29% of the world. 😂😂

    • @MM-dh3wr
      @MM-dh3wr 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@azadpathak7895 only 4% of Indians; second TRUTH is an invariant and not to be based on voting; but by evidence;
      You know People supported AIT in the beginning and after Kashmir issue came they switched sides. Just for political reasoning AIT is being invalidated based on votes from selected groups.
      TRUTH shall make you free.
      ARYANS have a history of changing documents; All the puranas were just created for that purpose.
      1. Changed the Buddhists documents Damma Pada(Brahmin kills parents they can go sin free)
      2. Talmud in TORA
      3. Brahamhathi dosha, Chathur Varna(in GITA), Purusha sukhta(in VEDA) all inserted to control the population.

    • @azadpathak7895
      @azadpathak7895 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MM-dh3wr th-cam.com/video/1bsyi4zYHP0/w-d-xo.html
      Go watch. Spend some time. Don't argue unnecessarily. Don't spread hate about us. There's nothing like North or South Indian. We are one, united and we have a history which is the greatest and it is only ours. No AIT for us and for truth.

    • @MM-dh3wr
      @MM-dh3wr 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@azadpathak7895 we follow the TRUTH and don't make the TRUTH follow our opinion. That is not TRUTH.

  • @akbrahma7739
    @akbrahma7739 6 ปีที่แล้ว +522

    You missed a major group, the mongoloid or turanian people who settled in north east and mixed with aryans to form the Bengali and Assamese people, or is it that you believe they are non Indians?

    • @User360iskon
      @User360iskon 6 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Ankur Brahma thats wht i was trying to say bro. NE has a different past. Mon khmer austrics and asiastric austric(andamese) migrated as cave man and den tibeto burman groups like meitei, bodo kachari, naga etc. Den the indo aryans and den tai groups.

    • @User360iskon
      @User360iskon 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      TTP JFK dose were Tai ahoms who were frm yunan,china. Dey came in 1228 AD and made the assamese community

    • @hnb193
      @hnb193 6 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      Ankur Brahma Not plain Mongoloid among Assamese. Tibeto Burman (Kacharis Karbi etc) plus Austric (Garo, Khasi) initially and a later mixture from Aryans (Brahmins, Kalitas) and Thais (Ahoms). Even Dravidian ancestry(Fishing community).
      I doubt Bengalis have such diverse genes as Assamese have.

    • @omfriend
      @omfriend 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      motownphenom you black

    • @omfriend
      @omfriend 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ankur Brahma yeah resisted mughal and converted to Christianity...u may be god damn proud of that too right?
      except for Assam all of you are converts...

  • @nerinavshrestha3338
    @nerinavshrestha3338 6 ปีที่แล้ว +222

    Indus valley civilization found in Harappa and Mohenjo Daro May have been just the tip of the iceberg. There are other potentially older remnants of lost civilization of proto-indus culture in the Himalayan foothills waiting to be unearthed. In most of north India, the remnants has been totally eradicated due to population pressure.

    • @TheMidnightClub10
      @TheMidnightClub10 5 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      And due to countless invasions in Afghanistan Pakistan Sindh too bro
      Include this too that's why we have European Greek Persian dna and facial look immigratiin trade settlings were common like Hungarians they were Huns Asians not European that's why Austria Hungary Germans we're proud of their ancestory........

    • @sakethvelikanti178
      @sakethvelikanti178 5 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @Thracian Princess stfu....
      You fucking ripped off Atlantis from our old hindu mythos...and you dare call us worshipping Poseidon?

    • @buteos8632
      @buteos8632 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      my home world lol do you know who is not proud of their ancestry?

    • @buteos8632
      @buteos8632 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thracian Princess 😆

    • @buteos8632
      @buteos8632 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Saketh Velikanti take it easy, if it's that easy to piss you off you come as a weak person. she's not right, but she's just another victim of ignorance like you! have some respect for yourself and others

  • @whosright21
    @whosright21 3 ปีที่แล้ว +117

    The unfortunate part about selecting names like Ancestral North Indian (ANI) and Ancestral South Indian (ASI) to divide the population of India into two groups is that it hides the fact that all Indians are a mix of both ANI and ASI. In actual fact there is no such genetic demarcating line between north Indian IE (Indo European) speakers and south Indian “Dravidian” language speakers.
    When we look at the original scientific publication in which ASI and ANI were defined (David Reich et al., “Reconstructing Indian Population History”, Nature, 2009) we find that the population selection to represent 1 billion plus Indians is very narrow and biased. Out of 132 samples more than 80% were from Tribes and the rest from Brahmins or other forward castes.

    • @GrandAncientOak
      @GrandAncientOak 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Why does it have to divide? It doesn’t have to. It’s a term used to describe a group of people. India is WAY too resilient and strong to fall to such a silly division.

    • @kaushiksaikadali7460
      @kaushiksaikadali7460 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@GrandAncientOak the division occurs because of geographical factors. We all know the Vindhyas were like the bisecting ranges of the peninsula, the area directly below the ranges still happens to be thick jungles and plateaus. It's no surprise that the same people developed differently in north and south. Doesn't make it as a separation, but a difference of development due to the gap in between these areas. That however doesn't prevent rulers to stretch from North to South, just that the local populace didn't have a lot of mix. That's the reason modern Bihari and a modern Telugu look different, but have mostly the same features because they're from the same people 4 millennia ago.

    • @user-uh9bl6lg8w
      @user-uh9bl6lg8w 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Arya means teacher in sanskrit, example arya bhatt the mathematician who invented zero India and subcontinent and former Soviet union area has connection of migration, therefore indo European languages are related but aryan superior and inferior race theory was coined by western colonists In nazi era with wrong and raccistt intentionss

    • @TruthSeeker69921
      @TruthSeeker69921 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Whatever in sanskrit is aryan's making.. they were invaders with horses came to north india.. they created sanskrit, vedic system, caste system by making themselves as brahmins of the highest hierarchy.. the true indigenous ppl are the dravidians(tamils) likely originated from harappa civilisation at the lost river of sarawathy.. there is even an ancient tamil city of Harappa in pakistan.. u guys can google and see.. but indian government is covering up because mostly are aryans and they will nvr acknowledge tamil as the oldest spoken language in the world.. soon links to indus pictograph are being decrypted using spoken Tamil.. incredible breakthrough.. that would bring back glory to Tamils whom were suppressed by the aryans for centuries till today.. so dont believe onto whatever the aryans made.. they are the crook brahmins plundered india's wealth and followed by british.. the original proto-shiva seal found in harappa civilisation in a meditative state can be directly linked to south india... incredibly the harappa civilisation emphasised on drainage system, fertility, equility, animal rights, self and social well being plus also meditation.. all these with emphasise to water can be seen in our Tamil culture.. the aryan's are from mesopotamian blood where they believed in gods, kings, pyramids, zigurats, temples, hierarchy totally different from harappa civilisation where there was not even weapons or war.. that is the ultimate shiva's teaching brought over by the dravidians to south india.. aryan mixed and destroyed most of the authentic Tamil teachings.. by right dravidians dont even pray during their civilisation, they only meditate because they have already came to realisation thousands of years ago.. om namah shivaya

    • @TruthSeeker69921
      @TruthSeeker69921 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @GOUTHAM KRISHNA Shiva worship has pre-Vedic origins. Please see my explanation below.
      The Vedic period is considered to be around 1500-600 BCE, around the time of the composition of the four sacred Vedic texts (Rigveda, Yajurveda, Samaveda, and Atharvaveda). And we have evidence that Shiva worship and yoga predates this period.
      The Pashupati seal (dated around 2350-2000 BC), discovered in the Indus Valley Civilization (IVC; a pre-Vedic period) shows the figure of yogi sitting in the yogic lotus posture. This figures is considered to be Shiva by many scholars. John Marshall gives the following reasons why he considers this figure to be Shiva: “My reasons for the identification are four. In the first place the figure has three faces and that Siva was portrayed with three as well as with more usual five faces, there are abundant examples to prove. Secondly, the head is crowned with the horns of a bull and the trisula are characteristic emblems of Siva. Thirdly, the figure is in a typical yoga attitude, and Siva was and still is, regarded as a mahayogi-the prince of Yogis. Fourthly, he is surrounded by animals, and Siva is par excellence the "Lord of Animals" (Pasupati)-of the wild animals of the jungle, according to the Vedic meaning of the word pasu, no less than that of domesticated cattle.”
      There are also other similar seals of Shiva found in the IVC. There are also Shivalingas found in the IVC (3500 BCE to 2300 BCE). Mother Goddess worship was also prominent in IVC. There is no evidence of Sanskrit or Vedas having existed in the IVC, as the Indus valley script has nothing to do with Sanskrit. Dhyansky (1987) discusses about yoga existing in the Indus Valley Civilization. Harappa, which is one of the sites when IVC excavations were found and whose name comes from the nearby village, can be split into “Hara” (another name for Shiva) and “appa” (meaning father in some South Indian languages) [book: Tantra, its mystic and scientific basis].
      Also, some scholars have said that prehistoric paintings at the Bhimbetka rock shelters (dated pre-10,000 BCE period) shows figures of Shiva dancing, Shiva's trident, and his mount Nandi. These are good evidences showing that both yoga and Shiva worship existed in the pre-Vedic period. Shiva in the yogic tradition is seen as the first yogi, Adiyogi, who taught the yogic sciences over 15,000 years back. Shiva and Shakti are also closely associated with Tantra.
      Although we cannot be sure, Shiva’s inclusion into the Vedic fold may not have been very smooth. Although Shiva was a prominent deity well before the Vedic period, he is only a minor deity called Rudra in the Rigveda, which is the oldest Veda. He is mainly seen as a god of anger, destruction, death, and feared most.Rig Veda 7.21.5 and 10.99.3 shows the Vedic people being against Phallus (Lingam) worshippers. The Puranic story of Daksha (father of Sati) insulting Shiva and calling him Vedabahya (which means ‘outside the Vedas’) have led to some scholars indicating that Shiva worship happened among the non-Vedic tribes. It is only in the later Vedas, and in the Svetasvatara Upanishad, that Shiva was elevated to the status of Brahman. All this suggests that the integration of Shiva into the Vedic pantheon may not have been very smooth.

  • @tamobiswas6083
    @tamobiswas6083 3 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    New evidences found which completely dismantles this theory ( or some part of it ). The ancient swords and chariots found in archeological sites of sinauli dates back to 2000 - 1800 BCE which is of the same time of Indus Valley civilization. Also the way the people were buried there shares much similarity to the vedic culture, unlike the Indus Valley civilization thus confirming that there was a parallel civilization in sinauli which was predominantly vedic. This makes the assumption that Indus Valley civilization is the only ancestor is not correct

    • @anon21qwerty17
      @anon21qwerty17 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      lol, 2000-1500 bc, aryan migration/invasion had happened. and original aryans buried their dead the same way as in this site. find out the same way of burial in ukraine and surrounding countries.
      it was aasi who burned their dead and aryan, to integrate themselves, used it.
      also dna studies are still not out from this site.

    • @kapilr.4768
      @kapilr.4768 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No buried artifact can deny DNA evidence.

    • @ayushdhingra855
      @ayushdhingra855 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@kapilr.4768lot of research paper against dna evidanve

  • @foodreligion78
    @foodreligion78 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Most of the south Indians are non vegetarians so they are very peaceful , tolerant and inclusive people, if you have any doubts come and spend in south, feel the difference .

    • @AruntamizhSentamizh
      @AruntamizhSentamizh ปีที่แล้ว

      th-cam.com/video/dvoKXxC_AZc/w-d-xo.htmlsi=FFUB3V8d-O1JDaBL 🙏🙏🪔🪔🪔🪔🪔🪔

  • @NikhilMishra-bq6uu
    @NikhilMishra-bq6uu 6 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    Such a biased video and the constant use of "Original People" "Indigenous People" "Real People" ignoring the fact that life evolved in East Africa and almost every one is a migrant some earlier some later. #Propoganda against a group of Indians from a typical person claiming victim hood. The biggest difference in appearance is because of climate for thousands of years people were agriculturists working in hot sun from morning to evening. So the exposure to sun played a dominant role generation after generation. The more closer to equator you are more is the tanning. So if the difference in appearance between people from every layer of India. A typical South Indian is more tanned than a typical Central Indian and a Central Indian is more tanned than a Kashmiri or Himachali.

    • @Senthilganapathy
      @Senthilganapathy 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Nikhil Mishra ..Ok leave the skin colour. What about culture. What about language. All South Indian language are so similar. I can easily understand 50% of malayalam, Telugu and Kannada without even learning the language. The grammar is exactly the same in all South languages. All lot of words in common. Where as the north indian languages are totally different from South, grammar and words.

    • @jhareeshlove
      @jhareeshlove 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Senthil ganapathy hahaha who told u this.. M south Indian..I can't even understand tamil n malayalam except telugu.. Kannada seems same but it is also very different.. Telugu culture is very different from tamilian culture... Every place even every small village has it's own culture.. How can u say everyone is same?? Just by showing few similar points u don't have any right to rub ur culture on anyone.. There are many differences in our culture. Keep ur theory with u.. Don't rub ur dravidian aryan theory on every south Indian state... We have our own culture tradition n history lyk everyone do. U people are real frogs in well. Stop propagating ur NGO knowledge.

    • @tangocharli1520
      @tangocharli1520 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nikhil Mishra ; you are absolutely right.
      As the skull shape of all Indians irrespective to Their skin colour is of same kind.
      Proving it to be a same race of humans in the entire sub continent.

    • @tangocharli1520
      @tangocharli1520 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Jhareesh Love ; you are entitled to your individualistic opinion.
      I have observed that Telugu people have a sense of insecurity when they are said to be derived from ancient Tamil.
      In the recent past *(some hundred years) Telugu are trying to move away to create a gap between other southindians.
      May be telgus feel inferior to be called as Dravidians and chose to be part of the Sanskrit origin.
      But let me tell you. No matter what telgus try to portray, their gene would tell the truth.

    • @tangocharli1520
      @tangocharli1520 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yo-sup Stahlin ; the sounds of alphabets and numericals is same of Sanskrit and Tamil.
      Both are derived from Same source. May be bhrami or some other ancient primitive language.
      Why Tamil is considered to be older? I think it is because of the archeological evidence found in various parts of south east world.

  • @randomclips7367
    @randomclips7367 6 ปีที่แล้ว +54

    They don't have DNA sample from Indus valley people but they ha've taken sample from people who likes people from Indus valley people...funny..haan

    • @kamartaj3010
      @kamartaj3010 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Random Clips Rakhigarhi skeleton doesn't matched with uppercaste. They matched with lowercaste and aouth indians. Loser truth has exposed you Aryans infilterator

    • @gauravs5529
      @gauravs5529 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Ucchta ki lucchta hi Brahmanwad hai they didn't match with Aryan they were not tested with brahmins
      Check your DNA it may be possible that it is aryan. Because Andheri Rat me diya tere hat me

    • @duffybrute
      @duffybrute 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      They took samples from Gonur teppe site, Shahr e Shokta site, Saidu sarif site in swat. These all are Bronze age sites from North Western south asia. So yes the research is still valid.

  • @dhruvjaiswal6998
    @dhruvjaiswal6998 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    The reason why the inhabitants of indus valley civillization came to further south was because the resources of that area were almost finished

    • @shalinitiwariscorner5210
      @shalinitiwariscorner5210 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      In Rakhigarhi, smashed skulls, pierced backbones and numerous weapons have been excavated. And they all date exactly sa!e as the last constructions in Indus Valley Civilisation.
      This is enough to suggest that just like Mesopotamian civilization, people of Indus Valley also faced attacks from steppe pastoralists. But to reach to the conclusion that the battle was genocidal, will be hurry.

    • @vukaleksic1654
      @vukaleksic1654 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In ancient times Aryans from Balkan goes to India to teach Dravidians and to stop the cult of Cali Ma

    • @vukaleksic1654
      @vukaleksic1654 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @userkrt579 i dont see that but everyone saw the Vedas

    • @mamtasingh2703
      @mamtasingh2703 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@vukaleksic1654anything

  • @abhinnakhale7520
    @abhinnakhale7520 6 ปีที่แล้ว +245

    Tum scroll wale apni aukat bta hi dete ho

    • @anybody9059
      @anybody9059 6 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Abhinna Khale yes true this vdo is fake science propogandist with Political agenda plz report this channel

    • @amit3230
      @amit3230 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Apne bilkul sahi bola..
      Iss channel unsubscribe karo aur not interested kar do...
      Ye log galat bata rahe hai

    • @vishaln1903
      @vishaln1903 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Report this video instead of complaining. Take this misconception down

    • @arjunbatra2072
      @arjunbatra2072 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Ye bhn ke lode south indian in kaamo mein zyada aage rehte hain jahab bh apne ancient culture ki besti krni ho ye madrchod hote hain waha....warna north mein bss mulle hain bhassad machane ko...baki hindu thode aware hain in sb cheezo ke barre mein

    • @anybody9059
      @anybody9059 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Arjun Batra ....half right All indians be south or north respect Indian culture......Indian culture ki beizzati South Indian ke naam pe Leftist,.madrasa chhap ,aur missionary agenda wale karte hai ....in logoko pure south indian logoka representative na samajhana

  • @sudhirkursange9571
    @sudhirkursange9571 6 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    There is no such thing as Aryan migration to Indus valley

  • @NativeVsColonial
    @NativeVsColonial 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    "The Veda was the most precious gift for which the West had ever been indebted to the East"
    - Voltaire

    • @DilipSadh
      @DilipSadh 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Fake new.. Veda only mention Sapt Sindhu No other land at all

    • @NativeVsColonial
      @NativeVsColonial 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@DilipSadh Stop denying the facts, this is not your Whatsapp forward, and if you get some time from ignorance, then seek some education and factual knowledge

    • @DilipSadh
      @DilipSadh 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@NativeVsColonial
      Dr Ambedkar himself denied any Aryan or outside origin of Veda in his book " Who were the Shudra".
      Show me any proof that VEDA's refer to any land out side of SaptSindhu ?

    • @DilipSadh
      @DilipSadh 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@NativeVsColonial
      Dr David Reich ( Head of Genetics at Harvard ) who also led Rakhi Garhi (Harappan site) Genetic study. Read his full interview as below
      economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/indus-valley-civilisation-is-largest-source-of-ancestry-for-south-asians/articleshow/71042072.cms?from=mdr
      - Dr David said "All South Asians are Genetic descendent of IVC (Harappan)"
      - Dr David said "there is NO Archaeological evidence of any civilization like IVC in Central Asia at that time"
      - Dr David said " He does not know what is Aryan"

    • @NativeVsColonial
      @NativeVsColonial 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@DilipSadh Bro I think you've mis understood the quote,
      Th quote in Hindi:
      "वेद सबसे कीमती उपहार था जिसके लिए पश्चिम कभी भी पूरब का ऋणी रहा था"
      And yes Aryan migration theory has already been debunked, I don't believe in theories.

  • @picture-perfect
    @picture-perfect 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    White invasion is a common story all over the world but in India it seems almost welcomed. A picture paints a thousand words so it a shame that pictures or accurate illustrations of South Asian hunter gatherers/Africans were NOT included in this video. The unmixed Jawara of the Andaman islands are what remains of the South Asian hunter gatherers, the original Indian, but no one here wants to talk about it. Waving the Aryan flag doesn't win you respect from Europeans.

    • @lifenrose9972
      @lifenrose9972 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Nara Fire true. and then according to geographical location everyone's color, physical appearance got changed

    • @picture-perfect
      @picture-perfect 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@lifenrose9972 Nara Fire is living in a dream world. Africa is the source of all modern human beings, as science has confirmed. Changes in appearance (skin colour etc) occurred mainly after direct or indirect encounters with Neanderthal and Devonian creatures. Yes, migration into India, before some Africans moved on out of India. Some stayed, of course.

    • @lifenrose9972
      @lifenrose9972 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@picture-perfect true

    • @ManabDasiammanab
      @ManabDasiammanab 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Who said Aryans have got anything to do with Europeans? And we kicked out British out in 1947.

  • @NileshKumar-nr2vj
    @NileshKumar-nr2vj 6 ปีที่แล้ว +137

    No wait for illogical comments on your way. Totally anti intellectual, those have never read a single book on Anthropology.

    • @vipulagora1325
      @vipulagora1325 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      tune "Anthropology" ko gaaaaand main liya hua hai kya ?

    • @jakeharper6189
      @jakeharper6189 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      This are in the illusion world of their religion.

    • @NileshKumar-nr2vj
      @NileshKumar-nr2vj 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@vipulagora1325 you wanna debate this ??

    • @PJ-cu4cl
      @PJ-cu4cl 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@NileshKumar-nr2vj You can just state facts here so these people who even get started. lol

    • @nityanityaViveka
      @nityanityaViveka 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      This video actually makes 0 sense to anyone with a functioning brain.
      1) It straw mans Out of India Theory as if it purports that there was no genetic mixing between population. OIT doesn’t claim that the genetics of people didn’t come from somewhere. It claims that there exists cultural continuity and regional cultural hegemony of the Dharmic faiths/culture that spread eastward and westward. Not the other way around. Genetic mixing has happened from time immemorial, we all came from Africa, but that doesn’t mean Vedic culture came from Africa or somewhere else. Indigenous historical accounts trace dharmic civilization north into Afghanistan and south to Kanyakumari, so why would expect mixing not to happen?
      2) The video intentionally conflates evidence for genetic admixtures with cultural flow. There was a long time where people insisted that Vedic culture was unknown to IVC, and many even believe that today despite the plethora of evidence to suggest the opposite. The claim begins with invasion, morphs into a widespread migration, and now to a comingling of cultures in 2000bce. There is minimal evidence to indicate that migratory pastoralists are responsible for the fort building and clearly urban civilization of the Vedic hymns. Moreover, if the “aryans” were the steward of Vedic culture, why is it that no evidence of Vedic culture exists in the supposed homeland of the aryans, or any of the civilizations there? Clearly this theory only exists if the Vedic cultural beliefs of the “aryans” only came into being after entering India. This denotes the antiquity of the Vedas to post 2000BCE, and flies in the face of numerous datings that place the composition of the RG Veda family books far earlier in antiquity. Now if the claim is that there existed PIE culture that relates the two together then their language could not have been Sanskrit as Sanskrit is not ubiquitous, and it could not have been Vedic, as Vedic dieties are not ubiquitous. A proto culture must have existed. In that case the relationship of that proto culture’s influence and the indigenous cultures of India must be assessed. It is not obvious that they brought the vedas with them. It is obvious that the vedas were not composed monolithically, and are likely the construction of disparate traditions throughout the dharmic cultural network. All evidence points to that network existing throughout India, and extending deep into Afghanistan.
      3) Given the predilection for Indians to prefer fair skin, it is equally likely that migratory pastoralists who did come into the continent from time to time were considered beautiful and fair, and that led to their intermarriage with “upper castes” and can account for the genetic disposition of the population. Conquest of those areas from early Indic expansionists in the Afghan/Iran region can explain this as well, and such conflicts are likely the essence of the Rg Vedic hymns. Most Rg Vedic hymns are about conflict with dasyus, and are likely linked with the Iranian Dahyus (s-h cognate). So to conclude a cultural takeover of an immense and hugely populated culture like IVC from trickling migrations is fanciful. Moreover, the claim that such migrants were able to overpower and impose casteism on top a much larger indigenous population is ridiculous.
      4) Out of India movements can be understood as having happened throughout history, including Mithraism in Greece, Gypsy migratons, Aryabhatta’s mathematical works, and the cultural spread due to the sea faring IVC civilization. Assuming a eastward cultural flow by default is nothing but bias and bigotry.
      Poor take.

  • @Siddharthglare
    @Siddharthglare 3 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    the DNA study of a 4500-year-old skeleton found in Rakhigarhi, in Haryana, suggests that modern people in India are likely to have descended from the same population.
    These path-breaking insights came to light after scientists were able to sequence genome from the skeleton of a woman and study the archaeological evidence found in Rakhigarhi, a village located some 150 kilometers from Delhi. Rakhigarhi is the largest Harappan site in India.

    • @doityourselfpakistan6535
      @doityourselfpakistan6535 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The results have persian dna in rakhugarhi mixed with south indian dravdian dna . So the aryan theory is not correct , perisns were called arya btw

    • @kanjanarcoticmadeusfall1179DB
      @kanjanarcoticmadeusfall1179DB ปีที่แล้ว

      Aryan migration
      Asian migration
      European migration occurred during post indus valley civilization

    • @manish7897
      @manish7897 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@kanjanarcoticmadeusfall1179DBilaj kara le 😂😂

    • @kuttycreations1960
      @kuttycreations1960 ปีที่แล้ว

      In south asia. who are more dark, they have most south asian hunter gatherer genome. who are white, they have most aryan steppe pastoralist genome .

  • @nishajaihindajain9192
    @nishajaihindajain9192 3 ปีที่แล้ว +104

    In Tamil literature there is mention of a poet describing the beauty of a girl comparing her wide face with the wide roads , citties and other structures which shows the urban culture they followed . Indus valley is also a urban culture who were very educated , knew everything about technology.

    • @idontusecryptocurrency5870
      @idontusecryptocurrency5870 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Obviously everybody knows that indus valley people hd their own civilisation.They hv written language sewage system cities etc.But i dont know what u want to prove by saying that

    • @rishtemeintohhumtumharebaa4181
      @rishtemeintohhumtumharebaa4181 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      🤦 All India was urbanized.
      So no doubt even in Tamil Nadu, there were civilized people.
      That doesn't mean they were different.

    • @SenthilKumar-gz1ll
      @SenthilKumar-gz1ll 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      indus valley = tamil civilization

    • @manojmadhavan294
      @manojmadhavan294 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@rishtemeintohhumtumharebaa4181 she says ancient civilizations in indus is Tamil...before Aryans came ..whole land is Tamil family...that is also said by ambedkar

    • @rishtemeintohhumtumharebaa4181
      @rishtemeintohhumtumharebaa4181 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@manojmadhavan294
      Lol Even the oldest literature of Tamils i.e Sangam Literature mentions Cholas as Aryas.
      And regarding Ambedkar.
      He himself considered as Aryan.
      Saying rubbish things like Shudra originated from Emperor Sudas.
      But his opinion doesn't matter.

  • @madarauchihaandromeda
    @madarauchihaandromeda ปีที่แล้ว +6

    As an Indian, I'll tell you honestly, this Hunter-Gatherer DNA is what make many of us look fugly. Iranian and Aryan look always good

    • @alani3992
      @alani3992 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Yes its the Austroloid genes, as some people in South India look similar to Australian aborigines.
      In North India it is also mixed in.

    • @madarauchihaandromeda
      @madarauchihaandromeda ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@alani3992 Yes and Pakistanis have also, but less, and Afghans even less. Even less you have These Austroloid genes, that much you will Look better!

    • @cprakashkumar6205
      @cprakashkumar6205 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The recent findings in keeladai, tamil Nadu reveals an urban civilization which was more than 300 years older than Hindus valley civilization.they even find writings inscriptions in household materials used by them which contains names of females individual of that time it was written in ancient tamil.so South Indians as hunters and gathers theory is fully destroyed by the recent findings. They even found urban settlements and ancient steel factories and a graveyard near that area.

    • @greaterbharat4175
      @greaterbharat4175 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@cprakashkumar6205keeladi is old like 600bce ( as par what I found in internet) 2600 year old only , you can provide me research paper what you read and telling us here

    • @cprakashkumar6205
      @cprakashkumar6205 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@greaterbharat4175 your talking about findings before the four phase excavation of keeladi site.During the fourth phase they found a pot of rice which carbon dated to 3500 years to 4000 years. It proved it existed during the Indus valley civilization period .But after the fifth phase and seventh phase it is proved older ,sadly the media didn't cover it due to a political agenda ( not a single evidence was found about deities or religion or any sign of worship). Yeah there is evidence but I don't want to spoil it for u because it will spoil your joy when u find it yourself.

  • @zionthestarofyoutube9961
    @zionthestarofyoutube9961 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    This is just this man's Opinion and not the fact.

  • @shifujikafan3720
    @shifujikafan3720 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    I am a half Bengali and Bihari from mother(born in Jharkhand) Bihari from my father(Born in Bihar). Living Delhi going to marry a South Indian

    • @anchitatrya2747
      @anchitatrya2747 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Salman Khan is Bengali??

    • @shifujikafan3720
      @shifujikafan3720 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@anchitatrya2747 arey fake account hai

    • @anchitatrya2747
      @anchitatrya2747 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@shifujikafan3720 ik I was being sarcastic

    • @dharshancs7457
      @dharshancs7457 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Finally sallu bhai is getting married....

    • @shifujikafan3720
      @shifujikafan3720 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dharshancs7457 arrey fake account hai

  • @Aryvrt
    @Aryvrt 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Propagating the Aryan Invasion theory invented by Westerners is shameful

  • @karimrohie9245
    @karimrohie9245 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    The Modern Iranians and Eastern Iranians ( Tajiks, Pashtoons, Pamirians) who are believed to be directly connected with ancient Aryans have different features as Compared with North and South Indians rather they have more features that closely resembles with Europeans, but some ethnic tribes in the Hindukush, karakoram and Himalyan regions posses traits that closely resembles with the Indians normally they are Dards who speak Shina, Kohwar, Kelashya and Torwali languages in which we can find words of Sansikrit

    • @ManabDasiammanab
      @ManabDasiammanab 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Pashtun are Persianised Central Asians and aren’t really related to Aryans. It’s Iranians and Higher Caste Hindus and Dards who are closest to Aryans. But some higher castes Hindus aren’t Aryans either like the Jatts who are Aryanized Scythians and Ahoms who are Aryanized Tibeto-Burmese people.

    • @sarmadsardar2218
      @sarmadsardar2218 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The People speaking Khowar and some other people living in valleys in North are considered to be the descendents of soldiers who stayed and setteled in those mountain valleys after Alexander invasion.
      And DNA studies also suggest that they resemble Macedonian greeks.

    • @johnsmith-oo9tl
      @johnsmith-oo9tl ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ​@@ManabDasiammanabjatts being Scythian is the biggest joke of the century . Jatts look no different to your Indian, they barely have any colored eyes , it's extremely rare . The descendants of scyhtians i.e. sakas or askazoi / askuzai are the eastern iranian people living in south central Asia like the pashtuns , tajiks etc . Heck, the scyhtians are a eastern Iranian people unlike jatts who are Indo Aryan Punjabis.

    • @ABO-Destiny
      @ABO-Destiny ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ManabDasiammanab
      But aren't Scythians the predecessor to Aryans?
      It shows in genetic marker too if what you say about Jats are true.
      Aryans and aryanic hindus have larger percentage of R1a genetic marker and r1a and r1b is shared by eastern europeans and western europeans respectively, however both r1a and r1b descended from r1 and jats do have higher percentage of r1 genetic marker in them.

  • @MUGAN9
    @MUGAN9 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Propaganda of this communist channel. 🤣 We are native to this land. We went outside of India and teach others our ancient language & culture. Bharat mata ki jai.

    • @dhruvjoshi2316
      @dhruvjoshi2316 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Communist propaganda backs the Aryan invasion theory. Here they have spoken about Aryan migration.

    • @dhruvbose1687
      @dhruvbose1687 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Bro you should watch abhijit chavda and sanjay dixit vid who tell with proof and logic how the r1a genetic group origin in india and invaded Europe and Central asia these scroll.in is a piece of shit

    • @AmeerHamza-xh9mr
      @AmeerHamza-xh9mr 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂mutr km piya kro

    • @agz843
      @agz843 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dhruvjoshi2316 you all need to shut up because you have no clue what ur on about. Communism does not care at all about indian geneology. Communism is the democratic and public ownership of the means of production in an egalitarian society.

    • @dhruvjoshi2316
      @dhruvjoshi2316 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@agz843 nice to see a commie triggered and turning red like his flag😂😂😂

  • @Theannahid
    @Theannahid 6 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    very nicely explained, since Im from northern part of Iran, and southern part of Russia, my father always used to say that this was true that Indians and Iranians had one thing in common and it was to be Aryans...thanks for your comprehensive yet easily to understand explanation dear sir.

    • @SenthilKumar-dl2cy
      @SenthilKumar-dl2cy 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      haha lies 😂😂😂👍✌ keep believing it

    • @Theannahid
      @Theannahid 5 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @@SenthilKumar-dl2cy , I think you should be proud of your Aryan blood connection, this theory is not fake, the human exodus from Africa and its expansion to all over the world is a strong evidence that no race in the world was belonged permanently to the same land...we all spread all over the world. I was shocked when I did my ancestry DNA test and it revealed that I was European , with Indian blood in me, where as I am an Armenian and I always believed to be an Armenian and nothing else. so please look outside of window of reality you'll see becoming of a member of a society or culture wasn't the same 25,000 years ago. the words like Hindu,Irani,English,French, American and so on is created by humans themselves and if you go further back you might see an African Tanszanian probably is one of mine and your cousins.

    • @SenthilKumar-dl2cy
      @SenthilKumar-dl2cy 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Theannahid yup what ur saying is absolutely true!! humans moved out from africa but there was a drought in africa which make them to move towards east asia there the r1a1 gene formed. if r1a1 gene is formed in Europe then why the variance of r1a1 gene is higher in india when compared to the other parts of the world? this is our history i will not be a victim of fake aryan invasion theory. even the science genetics and scriptures supports out of india theory. but what ur saying is true we belong to human race and our religion is love and affection but everything has a history "true history". the true history is out of india theory even the national Geographic harvard university and bbc india supports out of india theory i dont know what is with the orthodox christian researchers. but believe me man out of india theory os true excavation of dwarka city the city which was built by krishna supports out of india theory.

    • @Theannahid
      @Theannahid 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@SenthilKumar-dl2cy I still think Indians and every other race in this world originated from Africa,then life events spread Human Race to all over the world thousands of years ago. and it is still happening, dear sir I believe for what you saying, then again when I look at mother Earth from outer space ( just imagining), I see a small spot going in circle around the sun together with so many other spots, then what comes in front of my eyes is, all creatures who were created by a Big Bang were originated from the same seed/gene,and in more details we were created by cosmic dusts created by Big Bang. Your Krishna, our Jesus Christ, Jews Moses, and Muslem's Mohammad all also carry human DNA, please don't separate yourselves from other human's on this Earth, it started to sound like grandiose.

    • @MAN-jz6qc
      @MAN-jz6qc 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Theannahid first of all Aryan is not a gene, it's more of a cultural thing gene is R1A1 that is considered best or most superior gene and is found in highest concentration in North India Among khatri and Ahir castes both of whom are kshatriya or warriors the second highest Varna in Hindu system while brahmins have bit less R1A1 percentage in them but they are highest in Varna system so it clear that this kshatriya or warriors were the people who conquored all the land upto Europe from India that why's they also got a bit of R1A1 DNA in them but they are not aryans so if you go by this logic it looks like out of India theory is more sensible than migration theory.

  • @rumadhakacitygirlusa3471
    @rumadhakacitygirlusa3471 4 ปีที่แล้ว +87

    Wow 😮 so what my late grandparents told me about forefathers is true ! My forefathers entered Bengal in 1400s from Afghanistan and Tajikistan as mercenaries ! As recorded in old family documents in Farsi .

    • @coop-nr6nm
      @coop-nr6nm 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      You can trace your ancestry that far back? You really got a lot of history

    • @vishwarao6064
      @vishwarao6064 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      The timelines are extremely different

    • @AA-kx9jb
      @AA-kx9jb 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Nothing to do with this video. These are ancient mixes not something 500 years ago. If u want the truth go do AncestryDNA and it will reveal if u have any tajik or afghan. A lot of indians also day this but dna tests showed otherwise.

    • @walnut9472
      @walnut9472 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Lol As far as recorded My Ancestors Started from Ramnagar J&K,He was Minister in court of a king (idk how many centuries ago),There was disagreement between he and king and he knew next day we'll be Killed so he Fled to Nurpur near Kangra,Himachal Pradesh and donated land to Arya Samaj ,one of the brother still lived there and didn't Migrated. Fast-forward to my Great Grandfather ,He worked in Bank in Lahore after doing LLB But he had Cataract (I guess) and thus he was decommissioned and then moved to Amritsar (Before independence) ,His 3 sons including my grandfather moved to 3 different places One moved to Shimla and other Chandigarh while my grandfather moved to Kathua, J&K

    • @mokhan8832
      @mokhan8832 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      My Pathan ancestors migrated to Bihar in 1500’s according to 23 and Me DNA test. It makes sense where my family got the name Khan from.

  • @TheHarharmahadev
    @TheHarharmahadev 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Upper castes can’t digest that their ancestors came from outside india. I always wondered why brahmins in bengal look very different from the shudra community. Now i know why. They have caucasian dna about 70% R1a. Shudras are native population from bengal.

    • @johnjacobastoriv688
      @johnjacobastoriv688 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Scriptures Mai Kaha likha hai

    • @Creativity06
      @Creativity06 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lol cry more

    • @TheHarharmahadev
      @TheHarharmahadev 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Creativity06 reality sucks . I know

    • @sshfhsinvh6749
      @sshfhsinvh6749 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@TheHarharmahadev you r ryt the all are species of genghis khan.

    • @Creativity06
      @Creativity06 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TheHarharmahadev what reality?? You make these theories to justify your weakness

  • @SarthakSPyt
    @SarthakSPyt 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Okay peeps here is what i know and I'm writing this before watching the video.
    There are something called Haplogroups. These are basically genes passed down from father to son and mothers to daughters. The male ones are in the y chromosome and the female ones are the mitochondrial Haplogroups.
    This genetic information varies greatly because as the migration from Africa started , mutation in genes started happening as well, also to take into consideration, there are evidence of different kinds of human intermixing like with the Neanderthals.
    This Haplogroup, majorly in males, helps us to understand where our ancestry comes from, but it doesn't defines our race or ethnicity at all since it contains the information from a single line of fathers. So basically it gives a a rough image of single line of our ancestors.
    In India the majority of people have the same DNA which a result of primarily the admixture of three ethnicities, first the Indo Europeans hunters, the Yamnaya people which came from the steppe also know as steppe pastrolists, the Iranian farmers/agriculturists group which came from Iran obviously, and the third is the earliest tribal groups of India the Andaman and Nicobar island people which came from the first Migration from Africa.
    We are basically the mixture of these 3 and many other minority groups.
    The Haplogroups of the Steppe pastoralists are of r1a and r1b type also called the aryan gene.
    Similarly the Iranians and the Andaman Nicobar island people also have distinct Haplogroups.
    The Haplogroups may tell us about where our fatherly lineage came from but again it doesn't defines our race or ethnicity in any way.
    The majority of Indians share the same DNA with very very miniscule difference, this difference being the difference in the percentage of the 3 major ethnic group we come from.

  • @ayushirawat988
    @ayushirawat988 4 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Ek kaam kro jitne b comments m lad rhe ho na Jakr apna DNA test kra lo 😂😂... Or agar koi aryan ya fir dravidan ya fir Mongolian ya fir blah blah nikla ek dusre ko novel prize dedena ok😂😂🤪 or fir desh k baare m b sochlena ye krke

  • @JayantRaut
    @JayantRaut 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    *I don't believe in aayran invasion theory, and I am from North India! 🤔🤨😐*

    • @vm4992
      @vm4992 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I only believe in Vedic supremacy

    • @himeshraj11
      @himeshraj11 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@vm4992 I think Vedas are shitty*

    • @himeshraj11
      @himeshraj11 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Saira ShamsiAlmost all scripts are already analysed (Except indus valley script).

    • @arun1math
      @arun1math 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      he didnt peak about aryan invasion he said about aryan migration

    • @kollurubharathsimha539
      @kollurubharathsimha539 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@arun1mathat first it's inavsion then it's debunked so it's migration now what picnic theory 😂😂😂😂. I still have one doubt is they bring Vedas and sanskrit . How the hell did write about river Saraswathi which was exactly dried up at same time they came or before . Like they have seen its prime age . There are lots of questions arise . At same time period the zebu breed bulls are migrated to Egypt and Iran exactly at 4200ya . What about yamnaya tribe they literally slaughtered western tribe . Which is actually at 4500ya u know what their dna match with ours but when they messacred they attacked only men and male children . Those dna does not match with instead match with pure western . Yamnaya charraiot style can be seen in sunauli archeological stie how did this happen . If they attacked with bronze sword how did they defeat Indigenous people who are equipped with iron swords which is found in tamil site dates to 4200years

  • @logeshpp7717
    @logeshpp7717 5 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    According to your theory none has lived in india in ancient past all are migrated from iran and steppes.
    there is pre history tool (3 lakh year before) evidence unearthed in tamilnadu.

    • @julie5978
      @julie5978 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Those people are the Indian hunter-gatherers, keep up.

    • @ashishkumar8589
      @ashishkumar8589 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Homo sapiens evolved from homo erectus around 2lakhs years ago. Some Homo sapiens first left African continent around 70thousand years ago. So dont spread 3lakh year bullshit. We are humans. These aryan theory propaganda is BS.

    • @DemonicEmbrace
      @DemonicEmbrace 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Wrong because the original indians that lived in India who were the Andamins in south asia

    • @kbee225
      @kbee225 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Did you even listen to what he said?

    • @asksnq_q2314
      @asksnq_q2314 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Everybody came from east Africa

  • @sageofthemountain
    @sageofthemountain 5 ปีที่แล้ว +177

    Holy shit! Since when did Max Muller come to life again? 🤣🤣

    • @Shreyas834
      @Shreyas834 5 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Sagar Butola the people are fine examples of the reminescense of colonial hangover

    • @vipulagora1325
      @vipulagora1325 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hahahahahahahahaha

    • @jakeharper6189
      @jakeharper6189 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Since people has accepted scientific method facts and rationality to be basis of education and avoiding all folk stories of hindism and islam. About how world has created 🤣😂😂💃😂

    • @jakeharper6189
      @jakeharper6189 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@iamsogreat2951 nice joke 👌 brother 😂😂🤣😆😂. Use burnol if you ass hurt.

    • @usanna4903
      @usanna4903 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      When you and RSS went into your own tiny world of hibernation.

  • @kamalkhan5305
    @kamalkhan5305 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    The original inhabitants of South Asia were the hunter gatherers who may be the ancestors of the Adivasis. The Iranian farmers of the Elamo-Dravidian culture migrated to South Asia and mixed with many of these hunter gatherers creating the proto-Dravidian culture, which formed the Ancient South Indians (ASI). The Dravidians created the Indus Valley Civilization (IVC) centered in modern Pakistan and also parts of modern India. The Indo-European migrations from Cental Asia after the collapse of Indus Valley Civilization pushed the Dravidian society and culture to the south while many northern Dravidian also mixed with the invading Indo-Aryans creating the Ancient North Indians (ANI). The Indo-Europeans Aryans culturally appropriated the Dravidian history and religion, mixed it with their beliefs and created Vedic Hinduism. They placed themselves at the top of the Caste System while the dark skinned Dravidians and Adivasis were placed lower in the caste system. There was continuous gene flow in both directions during more egalitarian Buddhist period when the caste system was weakened but it was later reinforced by the Hindu Gupta Empire. Nearly all the Hindu gods and goddesses are dark skinned as they were originally worshipped by the dark skinned aboriginal Adivasis and later by the Dravidians.

    • @sskgrs
      @sskgrs 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You got it perfectly right, better than so-called anthropology researchers of the Hindutva brigade !!!!! LMAO

  • @savage-vf2gp
    @savage-vf2gp 5 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    So Aryan=brahmin?
    Bruh these ppl just destroyed the unity among us...😓

    • @manikandan_ip
      @manikandan_ip 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @Rakesh Kumar yes people like you won't made India unite.

    • @ulrichenry4881
      @ulrichenry4881 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      No. He is not dividing. He is just stating the truth and you can live in a society that is mixed of different ethnicites and culture I have done my dna and I have both northern India that is found in afghanistan and south indian which is found in maldives and I embrace both

    • @bobbykiefer4306
      @bobbykiefer4306 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      In reality. People from North of the Eurasian Alps moved back and forth across the mountains many times and traveled far on the steppe. The Brahmins one of these groups.

    • @dnranjit
      @dnranjit 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      He is stating the truth.Whats wrong in that ?
      we need more maturity and accept that ...we can and are different but are united in diversity

    • @asksnq_q2314
      @asksnq_q2314 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I’m not Brahmin and I have R1a. I’m Christian lololol. Should I claim myself as Aryan ?😪

  • @masterprimal
    @masterprimal 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1:16 The scholars took samples from the people who 'seemed like they were from there - Not an assumption
    The hunter-gatherers were reduced to Andaman - Not an assumption
    from the Aryan invasion to the Aryan migration, the next could be the Aryan picnic theory - Not an assumption
    out of India theory which supports the Vedic and puranic texts - a presumption
    BRAVO!

    • @daviddas5107
      @daviddas5107 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lol you think puranic texts are hard evidence?

    • @masterprimal
      @masterprimal 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@daviddas5107 You completely missed the point. Don't worry about it

  • @vetrivelmuruganm3075
    @vetrivelmuruganm3075 6 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    DNA Sample is not depent the nationalities because maximum people of world's DNA is same.
    aryan ,dhravidan,and maximum issues are Christ's missionaries rumors

    • @vineethjoshy4819
      @vineethjoshy4819 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not all are cowshit sanghis with their internet during Mahabharata, B2 fighter jets in vedic period, plastic surgery, test tube babies etc claims.

    • @ammumajety
      @ammumajety 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@vineethjoshy4819 Yes some are putrid faecal species who are willing sepoys to Western colonization and refuse to believe anything indigenous to this country. Self loathing asinine creation of subversive conversions who have been lobotomized in believing farcical claims and myths spread to undermine the unity in this country

    • @razorphil4973
      @razorphil4973 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      ammu bastard u expect some of us to believe in some aryan fairly tales. My tamil people have their own history .

  • @gcs2128
    @gcs2128 6 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    You will have to note that the very ancient greater India was extended up to Turkey and the present middle East!! Reference:Mahabharata

    • @gcs2128
      @gcs2128 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You could refer the below links, to know, that hinduism and boundaries of India was spreaded upto Turkey and Russia in the north,
      Above all the below links, Dr. Subramaniam Swamy confirmed it in one of a public interview.
      www.quora.com/in/What-was-happening-in-other-parts-of-the-world-when-Mahabharat-was-happening-in-India
      www.rbth.com/blogs/tatar_straits/2017/03/11/did-ancient-indians-immigrate-to-the-russian-caucasus_717193

    •  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hitte empire, mitani empire, the hurrians

    • @bear8ful
      @bear8ful 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Amol Khobragade Yeah like islam is real lol

    • @bear8ful
      @bear8ful 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why do you beat your own drums, that their is only one god follow my god or we kill you?

    • @DMD65
      @DMD65 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You can give reference from Mahabharata in literature not in scientific studies.

  • @astee.007
    @astee.007 6 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    Two things
    How can you say that the ancient ancestral south indian people is indigenous because humanity started in africa. So they are the first colonizers .
    Second that how they can say from a dna study that the arrival of steppe pastorals created an upheaval which was not created by Iranian agriculturalists .

    • @aryanbanerjee7579
      @aryanbanerjee7579 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      atal purohit "Indigenous peoples, also known as first peoples, aboriginal peoples or native peoples, are ethnic groups who are the original inhabitants of a given region, in contrast to groups that have settled, occupied or colonized the area more recently. "
      Compared to the "pastoralists", the hunter gatherers were indigenous, just as compared to the British, the Indians in general were indigenous to the subcontinent. Indigenousness is subjective and usually has different contextual meanings.

    • @astee.007
      @astee.007 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Aryan Banerjee so they are relatively indigenous . Not totally indigenous . Words do matter .

    • @aryanbanerjee7579
      @aryanbanerjee7579 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      atal purohit No, they are contextually indigenous. Usage of the word indigenous is supportive of this person's theory, and I don't see why the word indigenous is 'bad'.

    • @astee.007
      @astee.007 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Aryan Banerjee contextualy and factually are two different things and a theory is not 100% fact .

    • @astee.007
      @astee.007 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      And the question is not of aryan migration the question also should be raised about African migration. And first they say all brahmins and upper caste has Eurasian ancestors now they have narrowed it down to only tiwari es .

  • @unboxaccessory3211
    @unboxaccessory3211 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Yes Brahmins origin is Iran not india Sanskrit is from Egypt because Egypt was the headquarter for Sanatan dharm

    • @Mj-in5uj
      @Mj-in5uj 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      What's your source, I wanna know?

    • @MdkaishMdkaish-es5ch
      @MdkaishMdkaish-es5ch 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@himeshraj11 according to your logic Greek god and hindu gods are same because they are statue 😂

  • @ncxdf1277
    @ncxdf1277 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    *Proud to be descended from Dravidians/Indian aboriginals😍😍* who are creators of Indus Valley civilisation.
    Dravida Nadu💪🏽

    • @ncxdf1277
      @ncxdf1277 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Surya
      Yeah that’s like Mexicans being proud of their Spanish ancestors💀

  • @NannyMAU
    @NannyMAU 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Original people were dark skinned African descendants

  • @firephoenix019
    @firephoenix019 6 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    I'm genuinely confused. Why is everyone in comments triggered. Is it because the General Caste people can't accept the fact that we are all mixed? Or is it something else? Please enlighten me.

    • @bear8ful
      @bear8ful 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The Firepheonix I absolutely have no fucking idea

    • @firephoenix019
      @firephoenix019 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Not_A_Gamer Xenophobia and racism. Not new though. The way we treat our brothers and sisters from north east is a proof of that.

    • @scientificatheist9381
      @scientificatheist9381 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not_A_Gamer Aryans came and took over Lol. Those who settled in India were no Caucasian Aryan. They were Jews. The same Jewish societal structure which destroyed Nordic race .

  • @achudhan3001
    @achudhan3001 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Just because the facts hurt others feelings that doesn’t mean it’s a lie the world doesn’t revolve around you lol for the people who said Aryan invasion doesn’t happen

  • @govindnarasimman6819
    @govindnarasimman6819 6 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    studying similarity in genes and drawing conclusions based on assumptions from similarity are different. The assumption of step-pastoralists from europe relays on DNA similarity. they will be similar if at all it was reverse migration. and linguistically southern languages are more connected to indigenous northern languages. I notice that though by large there is some kind of division in color of skin(debatable because of tones.) There are only countable indians with different hair and nail color. entire europe is diverse in HAIR EYE and NAIL color.

    • @Kratos9407
      @Kratos9407 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      th-cam.com/video/wzBn0SaTKSQ/w-d-xo.html .

    • @kanjanarcoticmadeusfall1179DB
      @kanjanarcoticmadeusfall1179DB ปีที่แล้ว

      Aryan migration of Vedic brahmins from Persia to India in around 700 bce.

  • @kumareshbabu7951
    @kumareshbabu7951 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Not only Aryans, mostly all of the ethnic groups are mixed now. Never mind, we're global citizen.

  • @anosjc
    @anosjc 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Im having identity crisis. I have always known that we are very mixed since the beginning of time. Because neither we look white or black or mongoloid, the three basic races of human race. I wish I had a time machine and could see exactly where I came from.
    Also I don't think the Aryan invasion happened only 2000 years ago. It happened way before

    • @phanikiranbodavula5523
      @phanikiranbodavula5523 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It would have happened 10000++ years ago.

    • @curcumin417
      @curcumin417 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Just get a DNA test. At the end of the day -you're still a human being, with all the pros and cons. Enjoy.

    • @ManabDasiammanab
      @ManabDasiammanab 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Most of us are Caucasoid Racially with a mix of Austro-Asiatic Tribals and Austroloid Dravidians.

    • @anosjc
      @anosjc 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ManabDasiammanab we Indians are the first mixed people of the world I suppose.

    • @KishoreG2396
      @KishoreG2396 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@anosjc The Aryan migration happened circa 2000 BCE (which is around 4000 years ago). The Vedas were composed around this time, maybe a couple centuries later.
      The Indian people derive from a wide variety of mixed ancestry. The very first Aryans who arrived probably resembled modern day Northern and Europeans (some had blonde hair and blue eyes, etc), but over time these phenotypes changed.

  • @ronniehossain7500
    @ronniehossain7500 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Please don't confuse origin of India's populations with words like Indo-European, Aryan, Iranians and North Afghanistan. Reality is way different.

  • @soumyakanti17
    @soumyakanti17 6 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Probably for the first time, I have seen a coherent and scientific explanation of this topic. Thank you Scroll. :)

    • @nerf2752
      @nerf2752 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      abe wo chutiya bana raha hai.

    • @kartikeyapathak2213
      @kartikeyapathak2213 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      and in the first time you have been exposed to fraud my friend..........Literally DNA of mine or a Tamil person is the same.......these people are themselves troubled by their colonial history learning.........

    • @SithStudy
      @SithStudy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kartikeyapathak2213 it’s not about colonialism. Scientific evidence goes against the out of India theory. You sound like an afrocentrist

    • @Kratos9407
      @Kratos9407 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      th-cam.com/video/wzBn0SaTKSQ/w-d-xo.html ..

    • @adithiarjun6764
      @adithiarjun6764 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bruh u look ugly as hell

  • @Survivethejive
    @Survivethejive 6 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Great video, but many will not like it

    • @l5475
      @l5475 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Agreed. The very fact that Aryans that ruled Eurasia were ancient whites triggers allot of people. R1A is a white gene, even its mutated Asian gene.

    • @gazibizi9504
      @gazibizi9504 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@l5475 people are triggered because it proves North India and South India is by Civilization of different origin and not one altogether. It would mean Non-Brahmins in both North and South India would be hostile towards Brahmins and so Hinduism. It would break apart the whole world view of Hindu nationalists and their understanding of India into mud. They fear this might eventually lead to balkanisation of the Indian Republic beginning in South as they're already well educated and considerably developed from whole India and do already have a history of anti-India callings.

    • @thatguybutitsactuallyagirl5384
      @thatguybutitsactuallyagirl5384 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@gazibizi9504 Well, then they should stop the caste system bullshit.

    • @gazibizi9504
      @gazibizi9504 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@thatguybutitsactuallyagirl5384 You know no educated Indian is for caste system and neither does it matter much now but caste system is structurally such that abolishing for the sake of it makes no sense. What do you think about abolishing Racism or the concept of Race? You get the point? Even if we try it is futile. Caste system is not really important anymore and with few generations it would be forgotten and that is the only way.

    • @saarbrooklynrider2277
      @saarbrooklynrider2277 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@l5475 yes, and Western European hunter gatherers had dark skin. Still no one here cares. I don't now why it is such a controversial topic in India. Get over it. It's history.

  • @TheHarharmahadev
    @TheHarharmahadev 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Only brahmins or some upper caste people have problems with this new findings.. just accept the reality and move on

    • @amansharma-gk9jk
      @amansharma-gk9jk 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Kaise

    • @TheHarharmahadev
      @TheHarharmahadev 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@amansharma-gk9jk brahmins ka dna aur caucasian logon ka dna match kerta hai . Both have same ancestors . Aur caucasian race india main 4000-3000 saal k beech enter kiya hai . Not just that but oldest vedas also found in slavic areas, hittites empire to prove . Aur bhi bahut se proof hai . But humare acedemics just proof kerne mein lage hain ki aisa nahi hai . Foreign propaganda hai desh ko todna ka etc etc .

    • @amansharma-gk9jk
      @amansharma-gk9jk 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TheHarharmahadev beta har Indian mix breed ka hissa hai .. tribal logo me bramin dna kaise aaya ye bta

    • @amansharma-gk9jk
      @amansharma-gk9jk 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TheHarharmahadev th-cam.com/video/-3j-1Y-1sUE/w-d-xo.html ye dna studies hai different caste ke logo ki khud hi dekh le

    • @TheHarharmahadev
      @TheHarharmahadev 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@amansharma-gk9jk uncle ji indian mox breed hi hain . But apko shayad pata nahi ki indian brahmins ka dna caucasian race ka hissa hai . Aur phir indian ancient native se mixing hui hai . I have seen this video . It does not prove that R1a lineage k log india main pehle origin hue. You are only seeing one side of the story.

  • @premg2010
    @premg2010 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    IF DRAVIDIANS WERE IN NORTH INDIA WHERE ARE THE EVIDENCE OF THERE SETTLEMENT. IF ARYANS WERE ORIGINALLY FROM CENTRAL ASIA OR EUROPE THEN WHY IS THERE NO CIVILIZATION FOUND AT THE ORIGIN.

  • @adityaagarwal8981
    @adityaagarwal8981 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    There were no original inhabitants here.
    The south Asians you mention came from Africa 65000 years ago .
    Maybe this person hasn't researched well.

    • @user-ny7sg9mz1v
      @user-ny7sg9mz1v 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Andaman people haven't mixed with any other kind...so retained most of the features of African origin.

    • @user-ny7sg9mz1v
      @user-ny7sg9mz1v 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Hare Krishna yes that's correct

    • @user-ny7sg9mz1v
      @user-ny7sg9mz1v 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Hare Krishna Andamanese were not affected by the migration of mongloid population that formed modern North eastern people. Andamanese are more related to Negrito groups like Malay tribes,tribes in Philippines and Polynesian islanders who are part of first modern human migration

    • @gellegrainja9805
      @gellegrainja9805 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      bravo. ***

  • @sammychem5920
    @sammychem5920 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Your research excludes the fact that Tamil existed in Southern India for as long, perhaps even before, Sanskrit came along. There are Tamil inscriptions in Hindu and Jain temples dating back some 3000 - 4000 years. So who were these Tamilian ancestors from the past?
    Also ancestral Indians mixed with Chinese, to create SE Asians as well as NE Indians.

    • @SarthakSPyt
      @SarthakSPyt 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      No the research doesn't exclude this fact at all.
      All the Dravidian people and Dravidian language come from the the community created by the admixture of the Iranian agriculturists/the indus valley people and the Andaman Nicobar island people.
      Tamil was there before Sanskrit.

    • @Anon-lg5rj
      @Anon-lg5rj 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SarthakSPyt so why don't we find any tamil in north india today?

  • @aryanbanerjee7579
    @aryanbanerjee7579 6 ปีที่แล้ว +70

    Sources please...

    • @DataLedOpinions
      @DataLedOpinions 6 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Aryan Banerjee Study Name: The genomic formation of central and South asia

    • @aryanbanerjee7579
      @aryanbanerjee7579 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Arun Nair Good One. Haha.

    • @harshavardhana2859
      @harshavardhana2859 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      A recent paper. Even a very recent book has come on that. About people of indian subcontinent. Interested people can check it out.

    • @razorphil4973
      @razorphil4973 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Himanshu Bhatt use ur eyes and common sense . Thats the source .

    • @Flyingkitty1234
      @Flyingkitty1234 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Source:trust me bro

  • @maheshbabu4501
    @maheshbabu4501 4 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    जो भी कहो पर जाति नाम का कीड़ा जाने वाला नहीं है कड़वी सच्चाई से सबसे ज़्यादा गाड़ मनुवादियों की फटती है

    • @alphamotivation6268
      @alphamotivation6268 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Bhai ye jati pratha jayegi nhi isko bhagana padega

    • @TheHarharmahadev
      @TheHarharmahadev 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Kabhi nahi jayegi . Brahmanvad bhi kabhi nahi jayega . Brahmanvad ka roop badalta rahega .

    • @Phoenix-rb4bf
      @Phoenix-rb4bf 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nahi Jayegi Toh Bhi Farak Nahi Padta

    • @TheHarharmahadev
      @TheHarharmahadev 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Yahweh Official but they never created brahmnical verna system . Shudras will always stay at the bottom. Never be equal to brahmins. May there gods curse them and their supporters forever and ever and ever. Atleast for 5000 years

    • @apostale4986
      @apostale4986 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      apke hisab se kya Solution hae caste system ko khatam karne ka.

  • @ಚಾಮುಂಡೇಶ್ವರಿಭಕ್ತಾ

    I don't like to believe in the Indus valley thing, Sanatana Dharma and Bharata is older than that!

  • @newcellphoneguy9507
    @newcellphoneguy9507 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I m hindu born in gujart little looks like Nepali and my gf is Muslim and she is from North India 🇮🇳

  • @Xyzpklmm
    @Xyzpklmm ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The white dravidians of today have european blood, dravidians before the aryan invasion were darksinned

    • @ALIMUSLIYAR1921
      @ALIMUSLIYAR1921 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wtf you talking you want to see dark skinned australioid male Asian pure natives came to south India Kerala I will show you they are here

    • @thelegendofalltime9923
      @thelegendofalltime9923 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tf is a white dravidian

  • @luMBAgO69420
    @luMBAgO69420 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I’m Australian But have Nazi Ancestors so I have An Aryan body but just don’t write bad hating comments plz

    • @flaminmongrel6955
      @flaminmongrel6955 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Except the word aryan comes form Sanskrit rig veda's word "arya" which means "noble" mostly used for then "academics" regardless of their skin colour or hair colour.

    • @luMBAgO69420
      @luMBAgO69420 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Adi Mate thx

  • @Sigma3095
    @Sigma3095 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I clicked on this video by mistake. Never have I regreted a mistake this much.

  • @karthikprakash1024
    @karthikprakash1024 6 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    The thing is who were Lived in indus valley civilisation..indus valley is Tamil civilisation

    • @fin3420
      @fin3420 6 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Yeah ok!!! So now what?? Will u achieve nobel prize for being tamil? Lame person.

    • @karthikprakash1024
      @karthikprakash1024 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      The indian government has still trying to rewrite the history...
      INDIRA GANDHI had burried more than 4 time capsule in emergency period..

    • @karthikprakash1024
      @karthikprakash1024 6 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      We don't want any credits... We just want india government admit and support for archeological research oldest tamil civilization in land and ocean.. There are 10,000 sangam literature in sangam literature that need to translate into modern tamil..

    • @boovanseelan9422
      @boovanseelan9422 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@fin3420 same are you going to get noble prize for replying his comment....butthurt jealous person..... Get lost

    • @MohitSapra97
      @MohitSapra97 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      its not proven, indus valley civilisation is lost and have no connection to modern tamil people, tamil might have always been the residents of south india or further down, including shri lanka. there is this theory of lost sub continent that is submerged in indian ocean , being called as true homeland of south Indians. but it is not proven and is most likely to be false indus valley people probably have mixed with south and north Indians, these people are what that connect us both, our common ancestors, were they north Indians? yes most probably based on archeological sites. their lineage got divided into two halves north and south Indians, its like our fathers were different but our mothers are same.

  • @karuneshkarry
    @karuneshkarry 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    So Indians were hunter gatherers and Iranians were agriculturists. And in between there was a great and advanced civilization Indus valley. Things don't add up bro!!!!!!

    • @arpit94gahlot
      @arpit94gahlot 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@James-xn1oe Because entire India is full of numerous fertile river basins. It is to be expected that agriculture was already practiced here and not imported from Indus Valley. The theory that everything began in Mediterranean is also rooted in old Biblical prejudices. Modern scholarship raises many questions regarding this. Agriculture is far, far older than the purported timeline in Mesopotamia. This video presents a lot of flawed statements as established facts, which they are not.

    • @buzdarbaloch7104
      @buzdarbaloch7104 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Now Pakistan is between these

    • @arpit94gahlot
      @arpit94gahlot 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@James-xn1oe Agricultural population comes from flourishing, not that there is a ready made agricultural population to settle down with vast prior knowledge of land, crops and weather patterns.
      Fertile riverbed regions are spread throughout India and to far east. In Americas, Native Americans developed their own form of cultivation entirely independently of any Mediterranean origins.

  • @RomitDholakia5
    @RomitDholakia5 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Aryan did not invaded India. Aryan spread out from India.

  • @UNKNOWNUSER01
    @UNKNOWNUSER01 6 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    He is right, Indo aryans didn't originate from India.

  • @AK-mj3vb
    @AK-mj3vb 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    India never existed before Independence it was South India or Dravidian land.
    Sanskrit means pure form of a language. That language is Tamil.
    Sanskrit, Hinduism, Budhism, Jainism came from Dravidian land or South India.
    North Indians their forefathers migrated from Persia many centuries ago. Got fascinated with Hinduism created by Dravidians (SOUTH INDIANS) and embraced it.
    Now cut to many centuries down the line they are preaching the Dravidians what is Hinduism. LOL
    They may call themselves real inhabitants of Indian subcontinent however cannot change their traits like below
    1 - Persians see moon during EID. North Indians see moon during Karwa chuwth.
    2 - Persia's national game was Polo they brought it to North India
    3 - Persian women wear burqa or niqab. North Indian women cover their face with Saree they call Ghoonghat
    4 - Dalph in persian or Dapli in Hindi the musical drum instrument was brought from Persia
    5 - Surnames or last names like Shah, Irani, Rana are persian
    6 - Persians give too much importance to the religion. We could say North Indians have the same trait.
    7 - Persians banned consumption of pigs. North Indians banned consumption of beef
    8 - They like Ghazals and Shayari.
    Nevertheless if you still say North Indians didn't migrate from Persia then go back to a good School.
    Indeed India is a union not a nation.....
    Satyameva Jayate......

    • @HemanthKumar-pr4qg
      @HemanthKumar-pr4qg 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is because of intermixing of cultures, not races.north india was ruled by Muslim rulers for the past 1000 years while South India was under muslim rule for a very short time( some decades of Delhi Sultanate, followed by reigns of Shah Jahan and Aurangzeb) their rulers followed Persian culture and this mixed with Hindu culture
      The DNA of modern Persians and modern Indians are not similar at all. If north Indians really have some Persian DNA, it would have shown in the tests as 1000 years isnt enough time for the DNA to change all that much

    • @AK-mj3vb
      @AK-mj3vb 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@HemanthKumar-pr4qg Don't talk like a semi literate.
      Everyone knows Ajanta & Ellora caves, Konark temple, Kutum minar which is indeed Hindu temple, Elephanta caves was built by South Indians. What does it mean?
      All the Dravidians or South Indians moved to the South when migration started.
      Scientifically South Indians don't look like North Indians(do your homework). Also, the DNA is different.
      In a nutshell North Indians struggle to find their heritage/lineage that is why you guys don't want to accept the truth.
      Sikh religion is just 500 yr old. The state UP was formed by Britishers and no North Indian can trace their history in India beyond 1200 yr whereas Dravidians civilization is more than 10K yrs old (ancient South Indian temples are evidence and Vedas).
      Now again you will argue
      Almost everything described in Vedas and Puranas ends with letter "A" because we always add "A" sound at the end of most of the words.
      However Sanghis trying to North Indianise words like Shiva to Shiv, Rama to Ram, Ayurveda to Ayurved.
      Now you know why

    • @HemanthKumar-pr4qg
      @HemanthKumar-pr4qg 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@AK-mj3vb bro I am South Indian myself.... although all things you said can give an impression that you are saying the truth...I will trust the DNA samples more. And there is no way south Indians can spread all across the south in mere 1000 years

    • @AK-mj3vb
      @AK-mj3vb 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@HemanthKumar-pr4qg Dear I never said 100% South Indians left North. However the percentage is very low as majority South Indians always preferred to live in South India. As our civilization started there.
      And don't forget the population then was low not like it is today 250 million and a very few people lived above 50yr.
      Still today many South Indians live in Orissa and Goa. Hence in 1970 during Annadurai movement we demanded succession of all South Indian states from Indian union including some parts of Orissa.

  • @Rishabh-Dev
    @Rishabh-Dev 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Indus Valley was the birthplace of Hinduism.🤘

    • @Rishabh-Dev
      @Rishabh-Dev ปีที่แล้ว

      @Bonaparte No i am a descendant of IVC, Beyond all religions..✌️ Also pro-life and Pro-Nature.

  • @prasadnvsk1938
    @prasadnvsk1938 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Please stop calling ourselves South Asians. We are indians . This is India subcontinent. Europeans, Americans, Chinese, Africans all have their separate names, so do we. Indian subcontinent it is

  • @ranjith999
    @ranjith999 6 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    How about the keladi findings in tamilnadu? Haven't u included this in your reseach? I know u cant as lots of escavations are yet to be done which would change your ideas.

    • @piyushbothra2651
      @piyushbothra2651 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Keezhadi is just 600 BC. This is not going to prove the migration.

    • @ranjith999
      @ranjith999 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@piyushbothra2651 As I said above.. The excavations are still happening and yet to explore more than 80% across Tamilnadu.. Genes of Irular community currently resides in Western ghats of Tamilnadu matching with Harrapan culture's DNA samples. Here the link is proved. There are lot more to come.Wait and watch for ashtonishing facts.

    • @Anonymous-xu2mz
      @Anonymous-xu2mz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@ranjith999 Ohh damn you replied after 2 years 😂

    • @ranjith999
      @ranjith999 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@Anonymous-xu2mz I have replied after 2 years because I got a response after 2 years. Plz see the msg chain. 😁

    • @Anonymous-xu2mz
      @Anonymous-xu2mz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ranjith999 Btw which state

  • @justincaseiamhere
    @justincaseiamhere 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Blue eyes blonde hair
    Oh come on we are all human from Africa

    • @antondavidoff150
      @antondavidoff150 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      right, but for some strange reason, blonde girl with blue eye is my number 1 choice. My grandmother was one and my other grandfather was from simmilar line. Luckely i turnout swarty and brown which is good for guys, meanwhile for the woman is different story.

    • @jacknutbrown7765
      @jacknutbrown7765 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Actually this has been debunked many many times

    • @fallout1953
      @fallout1953 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Even if that is true, something called "evolution" exists.
      Dogs and bears have a common ancestor, so should they be put in the same cage?

    • @fallout1953
      @fallout1953 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@antondavidoff150 "good for guys" lmao, how? We don't live at the equator, not like we would have a problem being there with the right gear.

    • @dimuthbhanuka1027
      @dimuthbhanuka1027 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      it just a theory russian scientists already debunked out of africa theory

  • @sachlangjamatia7141
    @sachlangjamatia7141 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    All I know is ,invaders from other countries have messed with many of our histories
    Don't you agree ? my countrymen

  • @adityasrivastava9416
    @adityasrivastava9416 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I am bharatiya born in bharat whose ancestors who for thousands of years lived in akhanda Bharat .
    Aryan Invasion is a myth .
    End of argument .

    • @MajesticSkywhale
      @MajesticSkywhale 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Idk about any invasion or anything but indians are like the easternmost branch of indo-europeans. Started somewhere on the eurasian steppe and spread to India and as far west as...I guess north america now huh

    • @marcus.the.younger
      @marcus.the.younger 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      akhanda bharat??
      what a joke !

  • @VijayKumarIITSrExecutive
    @VijayKumarIITSrExecutive 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    This is a sensitive topic for many Indians since they have their identity attached to greatness of noble Vedic culture and Aryan ancestry.
    A few questions that pop in mind:
    * If India's political boundary today also included all the ancient Vedic cultures (Europe, Iran etc) and was called "Bharata", would one still be trying to prove "Out of India" theory?
    * Why not have a "Out of Kishkinda" theory where forest dwellers of Kishikinda jungles moved northward and mixed with Indians living in the gangetic plain (sure they do have some common genes)? or an "Out of Mexico or Brazil" theory where European migration into Americas never happened but it was the reverse?
    * How does one account for the fact that Europeans and most other Indo-European speakers in West Asia DO NOT HAVE any (that is, zero or virtually zero) South Asian IVC-related admixture in their DNA? (IVC = Indus Valley)? Does it not clearly show the direction of migration?
    I think an Aryan "Migration" happened and not invasion - IVC was already on a decline when Aryans came to India. Sure there were some initial violent interactions between Aryans and early settlers people in IVC, but that was a norm between different tribes/races around the world at that time and shouldn't be judged by today's moral standards (Classic books such as Sapiens or Third Chimpanzee is a great read in this area). My admiration for "Maryada purushottam" Lord Rama or Vedas still stands tall despite Aryan migration.
    An example of invasion is what Putin is doing in Ukraine today which is totally immoral.
    I do understand there could be a political ramification of this where a certain section calls "descendants of these Aryan settlers" (read "upper castes") as "foreigners". Many fear this has the potential to divide India and I acknowledge that sentiment, however in today's connected globalized multicultural world, people of all cultures/castes/races are "melting", does it matter anymore?
    If one reads books such as Sapiens and The Third Chimpanzee, we would understand how homo sapiens around the world are all connected, and have continuously migrated & come together to bring about big changes in how we live since we were hunter gatherers. No ethnic group around the world can claim an “original” homeland anymore, including the aborigines in Andaman or in Papua New Guinea. People need to be educated about this and the one-ness of entire humanity and not fall into trap of "one group is more exclusive/superior than other". Ironically, isn't this what "Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam" is about which we Indians are so familiar with?
    We shouldn't judge history by today's moral standards. History should be accepted as it is without any shame - be it good or bad. Glory of our ancient past doesn't become any less, and I am still proud of our Aryan forefathers.
    In conclusion, I would like to say that choice of words do matter as it has the power to send subconscious messages when we hear them. The words "invasion / raiders / annihilators / barbarians" isn't the right one to use for reasons mentioned above - context and history should be taken into account as well. Historians have a moral responsibility to be sensitive to perceptions created by the words they use.

    • @lulextract7751
      @lulextract7751 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Whether it is migration or invasion, this theory can't prove anything. The ANI include Iranian and steppe ancestry. However, the Iranian ancestry was split from the ASI mix around 12000 years ago. (At that time there was no Iran or India). The Yamnaya culture individuals mainly belong to R1b. However, what we find in India is R1a (Which constitutes the other part of ANI). And ANI ancestry is present in almost all groups in India today (Since a part of ANI was originally split from the ASI mix), even though the amount varies (Without considering that they had collected only minimum samples at that time). And you can't prove anything about linguistics from Dna because cells and bones do not carry linguistic proofs. Here is David himself saying his work in 2009 was WRONG. th-cam.com/video/3-vHByC14bc/w-d-xo.html (Skip to 45.00)

    • @wilsons2882
      @wilsons2882 ปีที่แล้ว

      nationalists and religious people who espouse ideas of sanatana dharma that was there and followed by all cultures from europeans before they christianized shows that its just a political game to clearly define europeans as outsiders now but its just hypocritical. so dravidians do have a history of their imprint of indus culture the valley culture however it was a civilization where the world met not where it was indigenous. so sanatan dharma is akin to european native tradition but aryan migration theory is wrong. that does not make sense.

    • @wilsons2882
      @wilsons2882 ปีที่แล้ว

      people can claim an original homeland its political in nature. race is real but not literally. however the indian hindu supremacy does not make sense. dravidians did have their own religions and we do find r1a in India and that gene came from the indo aryan invasion.

    • @ABO-Destiny
      @ABO-Destiny ปีที่แล้ว

      @@lulextract7751
      R1a and R1b split from R1. Small pockets of population still has R1 genes, some in central Asia. The jats of India have R1 genes in quite a few of them.
      R1b is concentrated around Central and Western Europe and pockets in Saharan Africa while R1a is concentrated in Eastern Europe and North East Central India among the privileged caste people of Eastern UP, Bihar, Nepal, Bengal.
      However, Poland, Belarus, Ukraine, Western Russia has the highest concentration of R1a not India.

  • @ladygoddess9360
    @ladygoddess9360 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I am from 1660's settlers in New England Upper state NY - American "viking" Western European mixture and my mom Canadian from similar european backgrounds, but my mom has southern European Crete Greek Italian. I needed to amend my previous comment. I have like 1 segment of what I mentioned below and many Asia- chinese +++ of similar amounts going way back. What makes sense is the silk road trading and/or the Yaminia tribes plus Beber and a few other tribes connected to us traces of indoeuropean heritage.

  • @unknownworries3507
    @unknownworries3507 5 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    *That is why everyone should read "The Breaking India book" by Rajiv Malhotra in order to tackle such researches

    • @user-ny7sg9mz1v
      @user-ny7sg9mz1v 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Oh that interlife reincarnation trust management guy

    • @unknownworries3507
      @unknownworries3507 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hindi me bata de,, samajh ni aaya tera comment

    • @user-ny7sg9mz1v
      @user-ny7sg9mz1v 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@unknownworries3507 Tera Rajiv Malhotra bahut bada admi he
      th-cam.com/video/-q7IXTOPvOs/w-d-xo.html

    • @vishwa5254
      @vishwa5254 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      thanks for your suggestion

    • @ravi_verma.2410
      @ravi_verma.2410 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      THEN WHY YOU DIVIDED PEOPLE IN GENERAL OBC SC ST

  • @dimitrithewise4480
    @dimitrithewise4480 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Indians are predominantly Caucasoid. (Only some have Mongoloid admixture in the Northeast.) Northern and southern Indians are most closely to each other and both are generally closely related to West Asians, Europeans and northern Africans. (-> Caucasoid race). The ancient native hunter gatherers (tribals) were Veddoid, which is a form of proto-Caucasoid. Indians are part of the West-Eurasian cluster. Chinese scientists suggest that India is the origin of the Caucasoid race. Race has nothing to do with skin colour.

    • @dimitrithewise4480
      @dimitrithewise4480 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      No, the hunter gatherers ancestry is not above 26%. In average it is 11%. Some northern Indians completely lack this admixture. Do not talk bullshit. You are the “Low IQ” idiot... IQ is a western measure for “intelligence” which is biased anyway and undefined.

  • @vineflower
    @vineflower 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    What is so controversial about this? Who is getting angry? Could someone explain this to me?

    • @Anskurshaikh
      @Anskurshaikh 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Because if this theory is true, it means that Fair skinned Brahmins are descendants of Aryans and they don't belong to India, India would belong to Dark-Skinned Dravidians which were the ancestors of original humans who came to India after migrating from Africa i.e the first humans to lay claim to Indian subcontinents were ancestors of present day south indians. This study might be used by some Dravidian nationalists from south to incite violence and controversy against north Indian which could lead to instability of country and its integral identity. Thus it is controversial.

  • @jitendrasoorada2649
    @jitendrasoorada2649 6 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    Could those 96 researchers collect few samples from Kelladi TN...or was there a central agenda which influenced these researchers not to collect soo....

    • @shubham42150
      @shubham42150 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What do you mean by central agenda.

    • @youmahesh84
      @youmahesh84 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      its keezhadi

    • @bobbykiefer4306
      @bobbykiefer4306 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Mitanni Aryans brought horses and chariots into India.

    • @human3213
      @human3213 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Bobbly keiger
      Please check your brain
      Mitannis were not aryans lol
      Forget about horses

  • @sreenivasjataprol695
    @sreenivasjataprol695 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Research is going on....plz don't conclude....be a seeker, not believer

  • @kartikrajsingh1895
    @kartikrajsingh1895 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hey guys! Who all is watching this after that controversy by the overseas politician on South Indians?

  • @qaisking7863
    @qaisking7863 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Afghans are mixed races.
    I did my DNA and I'm 36 % south Asian 45%percent central asian and 8 % percent European.

    • @duffybrute
      @duffybrute 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      We all are mixed. I'm Punjabi Sikh and my Ydna is R1a1a z93 which is very common among Pashtuns too. Please Join anthrogenica forum if you'd like to dig more into your ancestry.

    • @Ankitkumar-ey4ui
      @Ankitkumar-ey4ui 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@duffybrute so when you all separated from pashtuns in terms of culture tradition and language.

    • @Ankitkumar-ey4ui
      @Ankitkumar-ey4ui 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think pashtun have Greek ancestry in small amount as that region was under Greek rule for sometime

    • @Saravanan-ic1wl
      @Saravanan-ic1wl 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Remaining 11%????

  • @srinidhi7140
    @srinidhi7140 6 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Im south Indian, im kannadega, ಜೈ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಜೈ ಭಾರತಾಂಬೆ 🙏🙏🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳💞💞💝💝💖💖💕

    • @SenthilKumar-gz1ll
      @SenthilKumar-gz1ll 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      tamil is mother of language of kannada,telugu, tulu, malayalam

    • @Thorfinn47.
      @Thorfinn47. ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@SenthilKumar-gz1ll , lol kid tamil is just one of language evolved Harappan proto dravidian language when they harappan civilization collapsed and they moved to south, all these languages developed from one common language which was spoken in northern India Pakistan region. So black African tribe mixed tamil activists who scream dravidian propaganda all day are not even true native speakers of language, Dravidian language created in harappan civilization which is in north Indian region, I am a kannadiga and tamil is just one of language evolved from Harappan language along with Kannada, malayalam, telugu , Tulu , kodava etc . There are Harappan dravidian language speakers in Pakistan also called brahui, whose ancestors were harappans who stayed their only and mixed with aryans and preserved the original language, so harappan is original first and oldest language of India .

  • @shinkasama4712
    @shinkasama4712 5 ปีที่แล้ว +117

    What about the archaeological findings in keeladi.

    • @MAKavin-zr3hu
      @MAKavin-zr3hu 5 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      @Hare Krishna what about kumari kandam (lemuria) dude? What about it's undiscovered underwater mysteries.....Is it 2500 years old?....If Indian government starts doing archaeological survey there the greatness of the Dravidian culture will be revealed...

    • @vimalshivn.7441
      @vimalshivn.7441 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      about Tamils non one want to Talk about them! Why?..........

    • @manikandan_ip
      @manikandan_ip 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @Hare Krishna shut up
      Keezhadi has 2600 years old Tamil script.
      This means how many years before the script might be formed?
      And how many years the age of the language might be?.

    • @manikandan_ip
      @manikandan_ip 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @Hare Krishna half knowledge is yours.

    • @manikandan_ip
      @manikandan_ip 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @Hare Krishna yes.
      Keep the distance from me.
      It is safe for me.

  • @theanuragfactor
    @theanuragfactor 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    India, a land which is most blessed in terms of natural resources, fertile lands, rivers, varied temperature zones, and perhaps what not, only had hunters and gatherers! Sounds weired, isn't it? The idea that all the agriculture and pastoral activities were brought from far away outside, it's hard to buy, its even more hard to believe when we know that those lands of Persia and Steppe stand nowhere in front of the fertile and prosperous soil of India. And people of those lands turned out to be more advanced like in agriculture and animal herding, and people here were only animal hunters and gatherers by then, sounds bizarre! Just a thought what if everything happened in reverse.

    • @babla69420
      @babla69420 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Of course, people who lived in most fertile river basin and gangetic plains left everything and went to deserts.
      By the way how did they came to india in the first place? Are u saying humanity evolved from apes to humans in india?

    • @theanuragfactor
      @theanuragfactor 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@babla69420 Who said they left everything! Check your facts first. Read about Sinauli excavations, read about Arikamedu, and other such latest excavations in India. Dating back to at least 10-12 thousand years ago, Indian mainland already had pockets of flourishing civilizations, way before westerners learnt to wear clothes! From India, knowledge and wealth was passed to rest of the world, from Greeks to Chinese.
      Indus Valley Civilization is just on the newest end of all the Indian civilizational pockets, and many misleading theories have been created around it. Don't rely your confidence on some frenzied scholars sitting in Harvards and Oxfords.
      And who knows, apes developed into humans in India or in different places at the same time, rather than just Africa!

    • @babla69420
      @babla69420 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@theanuragfactor so..humans evolved in india..ok

  • @DraykeSax-Mac
    @DraykeSax-Mac 6 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    Loved the video. This video confirms what I already knew about the genetics of South Asia. However, in my case ANI and ASI contribute only half my ancestry since AAA (ancestral Austro Asiatic) and ATB (Ancestral Tibeto Burman) contribute the other half. Would have loved to see those included in the video and the affinity of population of the Eastern Indian Subcontinent (Eastern India, North East India and the Himalayan belt) to East Asian and South East Asian population groups. That's said, it's still a fantastic video. 🐒👏👍

    • @drdre5030
      @drdre5030 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Full

    • @Kratos9407
      @Kratos9407 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      th-cam.com/video/wzBn0SaTKSQ/w-d-xo.html

    • @ABO-Destiny
      @ABO-Destiny ปีที่แล้ว

      Is that your real face picture. You really look a mixture of many things ,😂😂😂👍👍👍🙏🙏🙏🙌

    • @Mahendra-vh7ep
      @Mahendra-vh7ep ปีที่แล้ว

      @grassrootsyoutubers9519 let me tell you what the Aryan Invasion Theory is. The Indus Valley Civilization was the most advanced civilization ever found on Earth. They had knowledge of trigonometry, geography, and they made cities as mini-models to build the most efficiently planned cities with swimming pools that always supplied fresh water, etc. However, between a gap of 500 years, the Indus Valley Civilization was destroyed. Scientists tried to discover what exactly happened. Max Muller proposed a theory that Aryans (R1A) came and destroyed this civilization, but upon examination, there was no sign of wars. Another theory hypothesized that a tsunami occurred and destroyed the Indus Valley Civilization, but there is no sign or archaeological evidence of a tsunami. Then, another theory suggested that the Saraswati River dried up, but archaeological evidence shows that there were more than five rivers present there. How did the Indus Valley Civilization get destroyed? The last theory posits that Aryans (R1A), who were basically European and surrounded by neighbors like Rome and Greece, came to India. They only knew how to graze cows and didn't have knowledge of farming, so they learned farming from the original Dravidian people. After witnessing the fascinating development of the Dravidian civilization, Aryans got jealous and started creating problems in their work. They claimed that if you performed pooja or havan, your work would be done. After that, they themselves would do the work at night (by hiding), claiming it as a miracle of God and controlling the Dravidian mindset. The evidence supporting this theory includes the development of the word "ghas" in Sanskrit from the word "grass," and linguistic similarities found between European and Sanskrit languages, indicating European ancestry. Later, genetics development showed that North Indian (mostly higher caste) and South Indian people (mostly lower caste) DNA did not match. Instead, North Indian people's DNA matched with Europeans, specifically R1A, which was absent in original Indians. The similarity between Greek mythology and Ramayan mythology (Greek: the arrow was shot in his toe and he died because all his powers were in his toe. India: Ravan kay nabhi mai usski sari Shakti thi; if you shoot an arrow in Ravan's stomach, he will die) all prove that Aryans came from Europe. From my point of view, the past doesn't matter; it's happened. Now, we are Indian, and we have to look after India. We will develop if we unite. Let's forget our past and be one. ✅

    • @DraykeSax-Mac
      @DraykeSax-Mac ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Mahendra-vh7ep I've not read what you've written tbh. But I love being Indian. The only thing I'd like some of my fellow Indians (not necessarily you) to understand is that India is not a monolith. We are a collection of people, ethnicities, cultures, tribes, races, religious traditions who are related to each other in some way or another. And collectively we make India, we are Indian. There's no need for us to have everything in common. We can have varying degrees of differences and still have love and respect for each other and remain united. The day people across the board understand this we will have peace and there will be no need for us to talk about it.
      Sending positivity and warm wishes for the new year your way. 🙏

  • @randomclips7367
    @randomclips7367 6 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    If they don't have DNA samples of Indus valley population .How they know that they some of them move to South and some of them mixed with steps people

    • @kamartaj3010
      @kamartaj3010 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Random Clips Rakhigarhi skeletons found doesn't match with uppercaste DNA. It matched more to lowercaste people and adivasi. They were native indeginous who built IVC not the aryan invasionist

    • @pranit960
      @pranit960 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kamartaj3010 bcz primitive adivasi peoples used to bury bodies if not burned and other people from very ancient times always burning their bodies and washing ash into pond or flowing water

    • @Rajkumar-ul7ko
      @Rajkumar-ul7ko 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@pranit960 still south india are buried body

  • @Jethro_Lyndon_Smailes_s...
    @Jethro_Lyndon_Smailes_s... 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    My husband was born & raised in Haryana, India, in the Hindu cast of "Brahmin" & according to his AncestryDNA test 100% of his ethnic background is South Asian. I was born & raised in New South Wales, Australia & according to my AncestryDNA test 86% of my ethnic background is from England, Wales & Northwestern Europe, 11% is from Ireland & Scotland & 3% is from Norway. We are a gay couple who are legally married husbands.

    • @yufakhattak8439
      @yufakhattak8439 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      LOL, don't tell me brahmans are becoming gay.

    • @whiteholeeducationcenter
      @whiteholeeducationcenter 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Your husband 🤣🤣🤣

    • @Jethro_Lyndon_Smailes_s...
      @Jethro_Lyndon_Smailes_s... 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@whiteholeeducationcenter yeah, my husband Sudhir SHARMA & I married 1 August 2018 in Parramatta, NSW, Australia

  • @thenewyoutuber4798
    @thenewyoutuber4798 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I think this Aryan theory is backwards. The Northern people of India left the continent and travelled into Caucas Mountains and into Europe becoming a distinctive lineage known today as the "white man". Look at most North Indians and look at the average white man.