After looking at the video again, I have to correct myself. If Bacrot did stop giving check and took the time to take the rook at h8, then it looks like Maurizzi could have delivered checkmate by putting a knight on c2. Both boards could have delivered checkmate at the same time!
@@tellahsage6477 One example does not prove your case, especially when you're using the highly unusual example of one of the greatest players of all time 1 year before he became the US champion. And what happened as he got older? The same thing that happens to most people that keep at chess as they get closer to the peak age of about 30: he got better. And when he was younger, he was worse. If chess skill isn't related to age, then that means 30-year-olds and 2-year-olds are equal in chess skill. If chess skill isn't related to age, then why are there only 2 players over 40 years old in the top 50 players in the world? If you don't know anything about a subject, it's best not to pretend that you do and make up complete bullshit and spread lies. Boxers and chess players normally peak around the same age which is about 30, so my analogy works.
@@PhilomathBret The difference is that boxing is directly related to physical prowess, endurance, and strength. This is completely different from chess which is a mind sport: what is required to be good at it is strategic planning, tactical observation, and calculation of multiple possible movement sequences and variations. Now sure a 2 year old would not be able to do any of these things (as you point out in complete dishonesty, deliberately ignoring the point i am making), but a 13 year old sure thing can be better than an adult at them, the exact same way there are 13 year olds who are math geniuses while there are 40 year olds out there who are dumb as rocks and can't even do basic algebra. To put things short: your arguments are not only unsound but also dishonest. And your initial analogy of comparing chess to boxing is so absurdly stupid i won't even begin to address it. Stuff only a complete moron would ever consider saying.
It is disgusting to see how everyone thinks they are smart. We humans are just humans, we are not that special. I would never blame anyone who is not smart.
Why's the tc at 5+3 all everyone is gonna do is stall when uptime, maybe washroom breaks included? Time is for stalling and waiting for pieces not thinking...
bhai garry to hlegend hai yaar voh pagal aadmi hai ches kel iye and he is playing the finance mininster of latvia i think graet graet please uplaod some more footage of simul of top 12 players with this event thansk chessc.omnews.
Right near the end he tries to show the kid how he could have played Qxe3 but the kid acts like, "Who cares? You ain't no good at this game, old bloke, you don't even know what colour pieces each of us need"
LOL what did I just see??? hahah the grand Master GARRY in trouble? hahhaa he seems confused, very confused, I think he doesn't agree with that variant hahaha
the problem was kasparov was playing chess and everyone else was playing bughouse
The kid is like what the hell are you doing Gary??🙃
Give him like 5 games to catch up on relevant theory
This is not how bughouse is played! Where are the shouting?!
I've been waiting to see this. The Great Garry joining the crazy world of bughouse! LOL
Giving Kaspy the benefit of the doubt, I take it that he didn't know it's against the rules to hide his pieces in hand...
Kasparov looks just as confused as I would be. lol
Garry's reactions are amazing.
00:51 the kid's like what the hell garry is this how you play chess
That kid looked like he was going to cry at the end there. Either that or he has a tick.
If kasparov enter bughouse seriously he will be the best ever at it. But i really doubt he is even considering playing another game!
At around 3:56, Bacrot could have taken rook Bxh8, give it to Reizniece-Ozola so she can deliver mate by putting the rook on c1!
Oh really
Garrys rating on bughouse would be below 1000 for sure
Wesley So's laugh is very recognisable lol
Legit bughouse games never have increments
5:19 is so hilarious. Not the least of which because the left-hand team has no reaction at all to their bungling.
what was Garry doing there? did he say "stop playing"? This was really funny even if i don't actually understand what was he thinking
@@blackmoonset5480 I have no idea and don't know the rules of bughouse. Looks like Garry doesn't know them either, haha. Funny to watch it again.
I love Kasparov, he is quite a fun guy to be around.
That is the luckiest kid in the world
I love this variant chess
After looking at the video again, I have to correct myself. If Bacrot did stop giving check and took the time to take the rook at h8, then it looks like Maurizzi could have delivered checkmate by putting a knight on c2. Both boards could have delivered checkmate at the same time!
Garry could have crushed both of these youngsters in a one vs one battle. Love you Garry, pleasure to see you.
He could crush literally anybody in a regular game of chess though.
Really?? Could Mike Tyson beat a 10-year-old in a boxing match??
@@PhilomathBret Chess skill isn't related to age. Bobby Fischer beat an international master at 13
@@tellahsage6477 One example does not prove your case, especially when you're using the highly unusual example of one of the greatest players of all time 1 year before he became the US champion. And what happened as he got older? The same thing that happens to most people that keep at chess as they get closer to the peak age of about 30: he got better. And when he was younger, he was worse. If chess skill isn't related to age, then that means 30-year-olds and 2-year-olds are equal in chess skill. If chess skill isn't related to age, then why are there only 2 players over 40 years old in the top 50 players in the world? If you don't know anything about a subject, it's best not to pretend that you do and make up complete bullshit and spread lies. Boxers and chess players normally peak around the same age which is about 30, so my analogy works.
@@PhilomathBret The difference is that boxing is directly related to physical prowess, endurance, and strength. This is completely different from chess which is a mind sport: what is required to be good at it is strategic planning, tactical observation, and calculation of multiple possible movement sequences and variations. Now sure a 2 year old would not be able to do any of these things (as you point out in complete dishonesty, deliberately ignoring the point i am making), but a 13 year old sure thing can be better than an adult at them, the exact same way there are 13 year olds who are math geniuses while there are 40 year olds out there who are dumb as rocks and can't even do basic algebra.
To put things short: your arguments are not only unsound but also dishonest. And your initial analogy of comparing chess to boxing is so absurdly stupid i won't even begin to address it. Stuff only a complete moron would ever consider saying.
I feel like anything major that is happening in the chess world, fabi is always somewhere close by.
It is disgusting to see how everyone thinks they are smart. We humans are just humans, we are not that special. I would never blame anyone who is not smart.
Why's the tc at 5+3 all everyone is gonna do is stall when uptime, maybe washroom breaks included? Time is for stalling and waiting for pieces not thinking...
The pieces that they play with, what are they called?
Reese's Pieces.
DGT Timeless chess set
indeed, such chess can not cause anything but laughter...
Looks like they're playing shogi with chess pieces.
I would like to see More 360 games
fabinao 0:02 🤔
I see MVL as well
he should stick with classic chess
bro what is bughouse chess id dont understand she sac her kinght on f2 and tehn knight on f34
give him time bro... he's a newbie to bughouse
male Gupta It's basically chess + shogi. Google it for more information.
go garry
I like bughouse
Yea, I seriously doubt that was the first time he played.
COOL!!!
A boa e tradicional Australiana!
poor Kasparov. But for sure a second time he will be winner
bhai garry to hlegend hai yaar voh pagal aadmi hai ches kel iye and he is playing the finance mininster of latvia i think graet graet please uplaod some more footage of simul of top 12 players with this event thansk chessc.omnews.
For the love of god, please learn to spell "great" properly. And quit commenting in Hindi. What are you, three years old?
This feeling when garry was winning at the and lol
6:54 kadının eli havada kaldı bozuntuya da vermiyor absbsbabnahs
El ogro :v
I know how to scare a kid now. And a woman.
im your fan
That remind me first time I played against a gm in blitz I beated him by saccing my knight of f2 playing the alekhine with black lol...
It doesn't really matter much about the result
Kaspárov is really bad at this, and he even blames the kid
Right near the end he tries to show the kid how he could have played Qxe3 but the kid acts like, "Who cares? You ain't no good at this game, old bloke, you don't even know what colour pieces each of us need"
I dindn't understeand why did they put peaces in their games
Consider reading the title.
Why are they laughing
their jokes are different.
oxiigen give me a timestamp
Amuricuh because of how bad Garry is at bug lol and his reactions of wtf are hilarious
they laughing because garry confused by playing his partner pieces
mohd alyani okay thanks
I thought someone murmured something
LOL what did I just see??? hahah the grand Master GARRY in trouble? hahhaa he seems confused, very confused, I think he doesn't agree with that variant hahaha
It is a shame that Kasparov must play with this ducks!!!!!!
This is bullshit, this is not chess.