FSR 2.0 vs DLSS vs Native in God of War
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 มิ.ย. 2022
- God of War : FSR 2.0 vs DLSS 2.3 vs Native 4K
Buy games at the best prices on gamivo.com - gvo.deals/TestingGames
Use coupon code and get discount - TESTINGGAMES
God of War - gvo.deals/TestingGamesGoWPC
System:
Windows 10 Pro
Core i9-12900K - bit.ly/3H4waEv
MSI MPG Z690 Force - bit.ly/3GVTNi6
CPU Cooler - be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4 - bit.ly/35G5atV
GeForce RTX 3080 10GB - bit.ly/3hUikXp
32Gb RAM DDR5 5200Mhz - bit.ly/3BOxlni
SSD - 2xSAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB - bit.ly/2NmWeQe
Power Supply CORSAIR RM850i 850W - bit.ly/3i2VoGI - เกม
![Which is FSR 2.x & Which is NATIVE? Can YOU Spot The Difference? [AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution 2]](/img/n.gif)
Hard to spot the differences, honestly. Hopefully FSR 2.0 gets wider support, so my RX 590 can have some relief.
those videos are super compressed. i dont know what it looks in game
They both still suck at 1080p
u have to experience in game dlss quality is better than native, fsr < native < dlss
@@ThinhNguyen-px7uf dlss>native sounds marvellous
@@katakouzina if you have rtx vga, you should try
I'm really happy to see that FSR has been able to compete with nvidias DLSS, I'm not being a fanboy but it's good to see that people who can't afford a new gpu can actually enable this feature to be able to play comfortably and have stable framrates
FSR cannot compete with DLSS at the moment, it looks bad.
@@spacecy yea, ultra quality on fsr looks worse than dlss balance imho
Can't compete with dlss ☹️
@@spacecy shill
@@blvck.8197 ..i..
its great that FSR 2.0 is not bound to specific manufacturer & also supports old hardware
1:41 I think the waterfall looks so much better with DLSS
Nice ur noticing is great
I think that’s texture bug, or texture variant of waterfall in different situation(?) Because the rest of the scene still look the same on all three.
@༺ঌTử♡Tiêuঌ༻ Then I guess this is a good thing for DLSS, the more details you have the better it is for you
good catch!
Yup! FSR looks cloudy.
FSR 2.0 is really good even at 1080p. My 1060 gets a 10 fps boost using FSR on quality which is pretty much needed to reach 60 fps.
I still prefer DLSS 2.0, it's still better than FSR 2.0 anyway.
@@tranthanhphuc9392 nice joke , fsr 2 is superior since doesnt need special hardware and works on every gpu , only nvidia tinfoil fans prefer dlss
@@tranthanhphuc9392 as it should be, my 1060 can't use it though
@@tranthanhphuc9392 of course DLSS is better but the most important is AMD did a good job this time, FSR now even better
@@lolololo2965 dlss is better but only in 30 series GPU, thankfully i can enjoy dlss in my new rtx 3050 which I will buy kater
These two techs are both brilliant
With the exception of the HUD, I doubt anyone could accurately tell what technology they were using in a blind test. Sure if you pause the game and observe granular details with a fine tooth comb you will spot it, but not in active game play.
If you know where to look, anyone can honestly tell, but that's not really the point. Certain elements are actually better than "native" with temporal reconstruction. Other elements are really just different & the minority of them appear degraded to a certain extend.
@@MLWJ1993 OK run tests with double blind random samples and get back to me.
Fr nobody cares when they play
If you really look you can see things like foliage and distant landscapes are blurrier in FSR than in DLSS but the two are close enough. What's Interesting is DLSS in this regard is actually sharper than native. At 1:51 DLSS waterfall actually looks better than native! Putting that into perspective FSR actually does an excellent job at reconstructing the native resolution. DLSS at least to my eye somehow is able to improve on the native resolution which is also very impressive.
this is because DLSS doubles as an antialiasing solution
DLSS utilizes both software and hardware components. FSR is pretty much just software. Given what it is, it's doing a good enough job.
Not sure what you are looking at. Native is sharper than both DLSS and FSR in all the scenes. Check out the stones scene @ 1:36 and pause it. Native is much sharper.
@@Dark-qx8rk thats perf mode, the quality modes are indeed impressive on both
I'm sorry but I see no instance where DLSS looks better than native. That waterfall looks more unrealistic than native, if anything. Native is always the best and DLSS will always be a compromise, no matter how much you try to convince your eyes. It might be the better compromise, when compared to FSR, but it's still a compromise.
DLSS still got the edge in terms of picture quality and performance but now the gap is extremely narrow. Good news for everyone.
Very close at 4k quality. Dlss looks alittle sharper but not by much. I think the difference gets more pronounced at lower resolutions, because fsr is worling eoth framedata while dlss is working with a much more detailed image and approximating I think it learns from 8-16k imagery to get develop its algorithms for each game.
Yep. Difference at lower resolution is lot better for DLSS, because DLSS is not just upscaler what clean and sharp image, it just render lot of image it self and perfect it. Yep, on 4k is difference smaller, but stil big between FSR 2.0 and DLSS 2.0 and 2.3, but on 1080p it's for FSR extremly bad. I have 1080p 15.6 inch laptop with RTX gpu and FSR 2.0 looks even on Ultra quality like "dogshit" compared to DLSS on quality, what looks better and even sharper than native 1080p in 90% of DLSSR games what i played..... DLSS shine at lower resolution...... DLSS in GoW looks on 1080p with Quality mode like 1440p, or just supersampled 1080p image to 1440p, what i tested internal nvidia supersampling method on 1440p on 1080p screen, DLSS on quality on 1080p looks even better than 1080p supersampled to 1440p.... FSR 2.0 is still better than lowering resolution from 1080 like to 720p, that's true. But FSR 2.0 in GOW or Deathloop looks on 1080p on ultra quality lot whorse than even internal 900p upscaled with TAAU or just 900p lower resolution. It's only looks better than 720p, it's compared on 1080 display to like 768p to 800p at best...... I like AMD before, but now AMD is lack behind Nvidia in software technology extreme.... DLSS is future, if AMD don't relase AMD FSR IA tech based and still use software "dumb" technology, DLSS will be still on another level + DLSS is not even on it's peak, next DLSS version ( like 3.0) will be even better, i think FSR reach it's peak and it's bad for AMD.
Yes I own an rtx 30 card, and yes I still think dlss is superior, but in some of those comparisons it's really splitting hairs and well done AMD for being able to compete without the use of dedicated hardware.
the thing is get the rtx card as you will have all options. and better rt
@@sharathvasudev rt is gimmick anyway get amd card for better fps/$ rate lmao
@@MtFoxt Rt is a gimmick but dlss is a miracle. Makes the image look better than native. Id switch to amd tomorrow but dlss is just too good. Fsr just looks grainy.
@@MtFoxt amd and fsr is suck lol.
You would only notice the difference between quality and native if you are staring really close to the screen, when you are actually playing it looks exactly the same and it helps older gpus to hit 60fps on modern games
Thanks for the tests :)
The one big difference is the waterfall scene, DLSS looks way better than FSR 2 and even looks slightly better than native. Overall though I'd say native looks the best, DLSS is like 90% quality of native and FSR 2 is something like 88% quality of native. Again the one big outlier is the waterfall scene where the water looks much better with dlss than either fsr or native!
DLSS on 1080 display on laptop is lot better than native in DLSS quality. It's like 130-140% native resolution on 15.6 inch..... FSR looks on 1080p on ultra quality like 75-80% of native at best scenario.... On higher resolution, gap is smaller, but FSR still looks whorse on textures, smaller details, vegetation... DLSS on 4k looks more like in most cases like 95-99% of Native, in some like Metro Exodus, or Control, or Death Stranding even better than native 4k and FSR 2.0 looks on 4k like 85% native resolution. What is good improve from FSR 1.0 what looks like 60% native on 1080p display and 70% native on 4k...
Fsr is not sharpened ingame menu. I think it's on default which is set to 0. Just increase sharpness to 0.3-0.5 and it will look like dlss.
Amazing info.
Then also sharp DLSS then you'll get much better
@@Mdunknown4133 Dlss is 0.5 I think by default. So, no you wouldn't get better.
@@brunojose7607 Glad it was helpful.
@@ribrob2798 no, go and check it
Tech is at a point where i don't see a difference or i "think" i see one but it is more or less the same. I would be hard pressed to see a difference while playing to be honest.
It is getting similar to the audiophile world. where bang for Buck makes no sense when you reach a certain level. Those who can't leave without that tiny difference and can afford it... I'm happy for you! Thanks to guys and gals like you tech always goes further and people like me get to catch the low fruit like the GTX 1050 TI or RX 6400.
In the later comparisons there were big differences, including with lighting which I found odd. FSR looked bad in those, DLSS was almost as good as native. So probably DLSS for the frames would be my choice but it would depend on the game.
Also, if FSR2 becomes available it may be a different story. Right now I use DLSS in Cyberpunk.
All hail free market competition ✊🏻🔥 !
With good sharpening, dlss looks even better than native 4k. You can use Fsr and Delc sharpen from reshader and get the same quality
Sharpening like Radeon Image Sharpening(RIS) is automatically disabled while playing with FSR. For reasons...
Unlike DLSS you can control sharpening with FSR 2.0.
Nothing beats native 4k for image clarity.
La ventaja es que FSR de AMD es un formato con mayor libertad y no depende de una GPU con Ray Tracing. Si AMD lo sigue puliendo, puede ser una alternativa para optimizar rendimiento de GPUs de años anteriores sin tener que pagar más.
DLSS sigue siendo superior pero claro, es porque usa los RT cores y una IA a diferencia del FSR, sin embargo, el FSR ha mejorado mucho y ya la distancia no es tanta, además que es posible su uso hasta en tarjetas de gama media baja, es una gran opción, no la mejor, pero tampoco esta tan lejos de la mejor, muy bien por AMD 👍🏼
@@joanayrton6133 El dlss usa Tensor cores, no RT cores
@@joanayrton6133 , ojalá se consolide. Uno podría ver maravillas en GPUs antiguas con esta iniciativa.
@@Sebisra así es, me corrijo, Tensor cores
@@jhonalexandercamachoherrer5075 pues sí, hasta donde tengo entendido aunque no tiene soporte oficialmente hay muchos que ya lo activan con sus tarjetas Polaris de AMD y funciona sin problemas
love how YT default loaded this video at 720p
I own a 3080 ti and a 6950xt and both are similar honestly fanboys will always defend what they have and I tell you this buy what you can get there’s not that much difference
Fps boost is the only thing i care about fsr and dlss it might be not perfect as native but at least it's still good on my eyes absolutely better than playing in low fps
preach
@@Alex-444x94 ?
preach
cannot see diference until waterfall :D its amazing
i can only see the 20 fps difference between native 4k and dlss quality
Thank u sir for that compare, amd doing fkn good job
Honestly I didn’t seen any differences but this is very wonderful using FSR QUALITY,DLSS QUALITY MATIVE! Greatest video!
Fun Fact : All these three experiences feels the same when you are in intense fights
It noticeably becomes sharper when switched to dlss
Nice work.
Thanks
Hi, may I know what program do you use to show the overlay with fps count and other system information? Thanks!
Hi, MSI Afterburner (RTSS - Rivatuner Statistics Server)
@@OliveDoctor thanks
the only noticeable differences are with the visual effects like smoke, waterfalls, ...looks more sharper and more fluid on dlss. Except this, they all look good and the same.
I like to think native looks best. Dlss seemed slightly fuzzy, fsr was clear but seemed like the lighting was off, or just a different time of day in the game?
On quality mode FSR and DLSS are on the same level, on performance mode DLSS winning. Native 4k is best quality option.
I tried myself and in 1440p (this is my monitor's native res) with an RTX 3080 12GB and DLSS is better than FSR 2.0 but not too much at least in Quality as we go down, the DLSS starts to became more crisp especially in motion.
Can't really see over TH-cam with compression and just the qaulity! Native still look the best. Imo! Like pause it at 1:16 look at his arm on the left edge and the ground. Native is just better even over video which is usually very hard to see lol. Same at 1:36 the rocks and grass even. It's why I prefer native gaming still but can't deny fsr and dlss when needed for frames quality is still there for sure! Lol
FSR has got just a lille blur on the whole image spectrum but noticable only when you magnify the image
In order to see the difference, I need to watch the video in high Quality.
When you see the waterfall and the greenery at the distance in valley you can easily spot the shimmering with Fsr 2.0. God! DLSS is phenomenal and a boon for gamers.
no one can say that fsr 2 is better than dlss but nvidia also has shimmering just look at the hanging candle right next to the trunk between 0 "13 fsr - 0" 18 dlss
1:41 DLSS IS THE BEST
FSR 2.0 and Reshade goes hand in hand, just make this game perform and look MUCH BETTER!
How do you use FSR with nvidia cards? Do i need to download anything or ....?
native does certainly look better
FSR 2.0 is softer way out, BUT for what it is and close to every GPU can use it, it's a winner to me.
Great video thanks.
looks like AMD is making tensor cores for their GPUS with RDNA3 the same cores that Nvidia use for DLSS. so FSR 3.0 its probably gonna be exactly the same as DLSS
In dlss you can see the lamp flickering at 0.18 which is not present in fsr.
Окей, сейчас рассмотрю разницу на видео, захваченном с экрана и пережатом кодеком, потом отрендеренном в видеоредакторе и второй раз пережатом кодеком, а потом залитом на Ютюб и третий раз пережатом кодеком, но теперь ещё и с 3-4 кратной потерей битрейта и качества к стандартам ютюба.
The music is
Maui Ogo - Were Crazy In Love
RSR : "Hold my Beer"
FSR is great things, respect to AMD for this. But is no wonder, DLSS using hardware cores, FSR using only software, things like DLSS always be better. FSR is great things for players who hasn't RTX cards.
Soo is just better just because dlss uses hardware?
@@eriuz No. The hardware allows it to get better.
you should disable the camera shake in the option.
at 1:41 it's kinda weird how DLSS handles the particle splash of water, it didn't take the motion blur in to account while the FSR and Native has the motion blur effect
Bald head is shinier than ever.
Dlss is the real game changer, not raytracing, that's why I got a 3080
True. Amen brother
its the most "next gen" thing ive seen in a long time
Do people even use either of this tech at 1080p?
If you pause the video on the waterfall @ 1:41 you will see which is better FSR vs DLSS. DLSS Ftw
cant wait for FSR 3.0
I can barely tell the difference. Amazing job AMD!
The truth is that if you notice the differences, there are people who still say that FSR is on a par with DLSS, but the question is, did I speak well of DLSS for more or less approaching the native quality, which is what do you try FSR, or to be up to or even better than the native image?, don't get me wrong, FSR 2.0 does it well, but it still has a way to approach the quality of DLSS and even now the FSR qualities give less FPS than before.
qual sua placa de captura?
1:44 thats where you can see DLSS destroying FSR
I play natively at 4K so I can very easily spot the differences in blurred imaging with both FSR and DLSS from native 4K. Some images were night and day with the smaller details like scales on Kratos, glowing stones, water, world litter and so on being much crisper at native 4K than either imaging technologies.
FSR looks a bit soft less sharper but good
This is great news for people who refuse to use DLSS.
FSR 2.0 has a sharpen slider, the default should be higher than 0
(it should be 5 out of 10)
I feel a bit silly buying a 6950xt when i probably should have spent a bit less and got a 6750xt for £500 cheaper and invested in a new motherboard and cpu. Oh well, at least I'll be able to run games using this technology 5 years from now
FSR = GOOD
DLSS = BETTER
Native = BEST
FSR gets more artifacts. DLSS is cleaner, and has more performance. Both of them are pretty good.
DLSS still better but the fact is FSR improve a lot, especially 1080p
sad reality is. their jump in performance are meh in 1080p. in 4k is a huge difference tho
if i say the best is still dlss compared to fsr, just wait fsr update maybe equal or even exceed dlss
Gotta admit theres like such little difference i barely dont see it. Or Said another Way i dont see it unless they zoom in on some objects. No Way i would notice it While Playing anyways. 🤷♂️
What cost for using DLSS instead native ?
Some black artifact but it less common for DLSS 2.3, which GOW use
Is it just me or native 4k looks so much better?
it should
DLLS почти не отличим от нативного разрешения. А FSR на их фоне всё-таки заметно мылит картинку, зато он доступен для всех.
Die Unterschiede...to be honest...sind allenfalls zwischen FSR und DLSS zu sehen, wobei DLSS auch in der Performance ein wenig besser ist. Aber ingame...im Spiel ... merkt man, wenn überhaupt, allenfalls den Performance Unterschied...und allein dieser variiert dann auch noch von Game zu game.
Can't beat dedicated hardware!
You have wrong
FSR work with AMD Graphics Card not with Nivida RTX 3080
It's just me, or DLSS looks better than Native? It was in more games, like Death Stranding or Crysis remastered or Control, but here is extreme. I play God of War on laptop 1080p screen and on it DLSS on quality looks lot better than native 1080p. It looks almost like supersampling, than reconstruction. It have better aa, better sharper textures and less shimmering on vegetation + better details of skin of characters.
DLSS is just some miracle in gaming and God of War have perfect implementation.
FRS 2.0 looks good too, but it's still in lot of things behind DLSS, that machine learning AI is still extreme advantage over FSR..... But FSR 2.0 looks much, much better than 1.0 version. FSR 1.0 on ultra quality, was like performance mode DLSS, now FSR 2.0 on Ultra quality looks like balanced DLSS 2.0/2.3
my small monitor can't tell the difference.
Gpu ???
I like both FSR AND DLSS ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
4knative a lot sharper that dlss and fsr. Fsr and dlss look similar.
Depend of the game, DLSS quality looks better than native 4K in Control ( CF Digital Foundry )
Not really maybe FSR and native approx the same but DLSS looks a lot better sometimes... The water textures are very good with dlss (e.g. 1:42)
He’s not using sharpening for FSR
Here we are again pixels spotting xD
How to upgrade to dlss 2.3? I have a rtx 3080? Do I need to update driver?
I think that yes
FSR quality Radeon card vs FSR quality Geforce card, we shouldn't ever see a difference, but if we do one of the GPU companies is being shady.
Fsr : holy damn it looks awesome
Dlss : wait...it looks like the last one
Native : HOLD ON....
I mean seriously, look how much zoom you have to make in order to appreciate the very little difference, not mentioning in games you usually don't stop to observe every square meter of the game, just in specific places.
So yeah definitely worth 100% the trade of fps for the very small detail
legit no differences in any of them, maybe something wrong with me
Cant see good its differences
Now compare NIS to the other two. FSR is indeed slightly better than NIS but it's nowhere near as compatible as NIS works on every game.
mfs be like: the difference is so clear! I just need to slow mo, pause then zoom in a distant landscape to notice the difference!
Dlss quality looks better than the native 4k
This is 720p, not 4K
DLSS clearly looks better imo. FSR 2.0 is no slouch though and AMD is working to surpass nvidia round the clock. Look out nvidia.
Eh...DLSS is the superior technology, from a technical standpoint, but FSR will run on almost anything. It's a reasonable tradeoff, I think?
@@TheCallMeCrazy I'm excited for that particularly on older gpus and consoles.
It makes me laugh that the owners of the 30 series defend DLSS so much, they should be glad that companies like AMD carry out this type of implementation so that people with not so powerful graphics can enjoy their games with a good rate of FPS without the need to use Hardware dedicated and with almost the same results as DLSS, don't be fanboys.
Dlss= smooth like butter FSR=sharp and grainy
and why not on an amd graphics card?
DLSS ainda entrega mais qualidade, mas a AMD avançou muito, creio que é questão de tempo pro FSR ultrapassar ou igualar o DLSS
Sem hardware dedicado é mais complicado. Só que eu já vejo o FSR a frente justamente por isso, abrangência.
@@TheEditu exatamente, se for levar em consideração que não tem um hardware dedicado, é um avanço espetacular
Yeah it's better than fsr 1.0 but dlss is way better. Dlss excell at motion and aliasing
You can get far better fps with ryzen cpu + radeon gpu when using SAM
SAM doesn't work on "Less than PCIe X16 Lanes"
That means any Radeon GPU that uses any PCIe of any Gen at Less than X16 Lanes won't be able to use SAM at all.
Same thing applies to NVidia ReBar (Resizable BAR).
dlss still better but fsr 2.0 is basically the best option for not spending another goddamn scalper price gpu
Honestly native is the best, but dlss looks amazing