Great comparison !! What I feel it's missing is productive GPU intensive software like Davinci Resolve Studio and Topaz Video AI (it uses AI tensor cores). This would get video editors attention ;)
yes but keep in mind there was also a big increase in watts from 1060 to 2060. i wouldnt really call an increase in wattage a generational improvement. you obviously get more fps with more watts.
@@nurag_s every generation is a 2 year jump. The gtx 1660 is not the sequel to the 1060, the gtx 16 series was within the same generation of the 20 series
So we went from a ~40% improvement, to a ~20% improvement, to a ~13% improvement. Can’t wait to see the 5% higher frames for $150 more dollars on the 5060!! Seriously, I believe this is a ploy by Nvidia to sell their older graphics card stock because the older cards are better frames/dollar spent. Pathetic to see Nvidia taking this route.
it's not 40%, it's 80-100%, it's almost double the framerate or 200%, that is an increase of 100%... 40% improvement would be 30 to 42FPS but its 58 to 62
Yeah yeah, because it's so easy to get 40% performance uplifts all the time, it's not like there's the issue of diminishing returns, die and overall size, transistor density, thermal and power consumption constraints, massive changes in architecture needed, new tech, compatibility issues... nah, they just need to wish it into existence and poof! Magic happens! (not defending Ngreedia or any other company, just saying, keep your expectations low or prepare to be disappointed)
I mean, the MSRP is lower than both the 2060 and 3060 and on par with the 1060. Right now a 4060 is 20-30$ cheaper than what a 1060 would have cost me in 2019 at the time of the RTX 20 cards coming out. I remember how many complaints I saw that the 2060 is an overpriced junk, same with the 3060 on release. Then again, most of the cards people say are awesome were considered waste of money on release.
Por esa razón era que cuando salió la serie 20 yo solo deseaba la 2060 porque era una 1070 que hasta casi rendía una 1080 y con RayTracing ahora que estudio sistemas es muy buena incluso porque me ayuda en la programación gracias a la IA
The power consumption on 40 series is impressive. It may not be that much faster than 3060, but that’s still something. My 1660 is still holding up and will proibsbly upgrade when 5060 comes out in couple years
yup, since it's using the die and power consumption that is typically used on a 50 series card. It's essentially a 4050 mislabeled so they can justify charging $300. The desktop 4050 was slated to launch back in June. It's now October and they still haven't mentioned what happened to it, unless they are unofficially conceding that the 4060 was in fact the true 4050. They weren't able to get away with the 4070ti being called a 4080 12gb but they probably think the lower the stack you go, the less likely anyone will notice or care.
@@theplayerofus319 the card itself is called RTX 2060, I wanted to talk about the name of the card, not the technique that the card allows to achieve, because precisely I said that the RTX have a significant improvement in performance compared to the GTX 😁
@@piranhax3396 no. The jump from the gtx 1080ti to the rtx 2080ti Was way smaller than from rtx 2080ti to rtx 3080ti. So i just wanted to say the namens has nothing to do with it. Its a normal generational upgrade just with added rt and dlss components
How crazy, does the 4060 have little difference in performance compared to the 3060 (except the consumption, which is lower), nvidia holding cards evolution (or would it be naming the cards wrong?)? Anyway, I'm going to stay on my 3060 a while longer, it's working great for me
the 40 series doesnt have that much of a performance increase over the 30 series but if you wanna max out settings and use dlss3 fg then you'll be able to play with raytracing in a games that you couldnt before but not worth it in general atm since not too many games support fg yet
The 4050 is hands down the most impressive GPU, it is a lot more efficient than the 3060 while beating it by a bit. Nvidia should lower the price for this 4050 soon, and I'd buy it if they do, $300 is just too much for a 50-class GPU.
@@mikhmikhser вообще, то что 4060 жрёт порядка 100-120 вт и греется до 50-60° даёт большой потенциал для разгона. А также благодаря этому можно взять самый простой палит с 1 кулером, и всё равно всё будет в очень хороших рамках. У меня 3060 8гб с одним вентилятором греется до 70°, не выше, а тут вообще тихоня будет
You mean 4060? It's not in this video. You typed 50 3x. The 4060 actually performs MUCH worse than the 3060 in any game that utilizes a lot of VRAM, because the 4060 only has 8GB while the 3060 has 12GB. Seriously gets half of the framerate sometimes.
xD man, for 3 frames more u pay around 100$ 3060 would have been a better deal for u... also i dont get you nvidia buyers.. ur sort of a cult.. amd is there too and in way better prices for hd monitors... unless u play at least 1440p or 4k... amd is better... nvidia is more for dlss and if u care rtx
@@PhantomLarry not necesarely, i just dont want to spend the most i can for most i can recive, i care more for value not performance! that said i do care about performance but at the same time i keep the value perspective in mind! i have had nvidia graphics cards in the past but these days amd seems no brainer to me!
Comparing 4060 vs 3060 I can see why some are disappointed, but against 2060 improvement is quite significant, plus lower power consumption. The only good thing about 3060 is just more vram, but that's it. 4060 is superior in any other aspect.
Nice to see! Biggest win on the 40-serie over the 30-serie is not really the 'slightly more' frames, but it uses clearly Less Power!. On average around 50 Watts. Thats good I guess. Just hope on the 50-series they dont just put in more power to get more frames.... stick to the less power solutions please.
I get everyone's issue with the little amount of uplift FPS wise from the 3060 to the 4060, there have certainly been far better jumps in 60 class GPUS. But I at least like the direction they've gone with power draw. It was a concern of mine with the Turing and Ampere based cards, though I'm sure I'm one of very few. As for the $300 price tag, that's not too bad either, I think the 1060 was about 249 or 299? even at 249, adjusted for modern inflation it's a fair price, and CHEAPER than both the 2060 and 3060 (if you actually could get one for msrp.) There are other things to like about the card other than FPS numbers.
no there are not, upgrading a GPU consists specifically in getting more performance, getting higher fps, getting more brute force, things like, watt consumption, software features, DLSS, ray-tracing, all these things should be secondary elements, the energy bill difference is inconspicuous when we're talking about a 100W, 80W difference on GPUs
@@evermartin3364 AHH I see your point it's not worth the upgrade if you already have a 3060 but as for me I'm only building my first ever pc and a 4060 ti being alot cheaper than a 306o for those of us that don't already have PC's and a looking to build one capable of handling everything well in 1080p 100+FPS high settings that won't send us into bankruptcy the 4060 was made for us, but I get why people who already have PC's with 3060 or something in that performance range are hating so much on the 4060 though you could always sell your graphics card and buy a 4060 you'll get a slight performance increase and you might even have money left over who knows
@@KyleC3577i mean, you're partly right, but even people that do not own a pc and its going to build their first one will be affected in the future, we're talking about the first nvidia generation that the 4070 ti gpu costs 800 dollars, and that same 4070 ti would cost 1199 and would be released as a 4080 if the community havent pressed nvidia, and the first generations that the final 70 gpus are the weakest comparing to the high end of its own generation, if things keeps going like this, the next 2-3 generations will have the most expensive final 60 gpus with the weakest performance comparing to the high end,
"power draw" except you can undervolt 3060 to draw less than 120W at those clock speeds. So the improvement is more or less just 15% at the same power with 4GB less VRAM.
As far as I'm concerned. I wish we could match the 3060 power consumption on the 4060 so we could get the performance jump we needed. That is the only way Nvidia can fix this mess.
This really shows you how nVidia is playing with RTX 4000 Series. The Delta between RTX 3060 and RTX 4060 is actually Smallest Generational Gap of the 4 Cards. Because RTX 4060 is basically what should be called RTX 4050TI. Even worse with RTX 4070.
Unfortunately the 6 GB of VRAM are not enough for High/ultra textures in 1080p nowadays (textures Is the most important setting in my opinion) so it lose its meaning because It can't deliver a stable framerate with good textures. Something like an RX 6600 or a rtx 2060 super would be better (8 GB of VRAM are a must nowadays).
@@s0cks1985 yeah but this video Is about the 6 GB model. Other than that even the 12 GB model Is not worth It because nowadays the RX 6000 have very low prices in comoarisons to the rtx.
1060 to 2060 was a very nice jump. Also 2060 did bring a lot of excellent new technologies like dlss, ray tracing, VRS, better dx 12 and vulkan support. 3060 and 4060 were awful.
The performance increase(compared to RTX 3000) of the xx80 and xx90 this series has been the highest compared to the whole lineup. There are videos out there showcasing this
@@BillGates_Alexyeah, it was a price jump of $1400 to $1600, and from $699 to $1299. Doesn't matter if it performs great, they're both insane, the 4090 is in a league of its own. But the price to performance is enough to push buyers away.
At the time, many people made fun of the people who bought the 2000 series. But coupled with the great drought of GPUs of 2021 and the meager improvements of some 4000 series, I think they got the last laugh.
Nvidia started neglecting the 60 series cards last generation, focusing on corporate greed and deceptive marketing practices. The fact that were pinning a disguised "4060" against last generations mainstream option is beyond funny!
The 128 bit bus is enough for me to steer clear of the 4060 / 4060 Ti especially if you care about using emulators where graphic memory bandwidth is important, the Yuzu dev's even put out a warning about this (google 4060 Yuzu). Nvidia knows they screwed up here which is why they're talking 512 bit bus for the higher end 50 series models.
Meh i dont care what yuzu means, i find the 4060 rtx totally valid. Ryujinx is not mention about 4060 which is fine. Yuzu can make a video or testing a benchmark vs the older card and then making a "sTaTeMEnt"
The 4060 has enough 128-bit bus, as this video proves. The gap between 4060 and 3060 is almost the same as between 2060 and 3060, I don't understand why everyone is whining. And plus 4060 has DLSS3. People threw a tantrum from scratch.
@@Aleksey-vd9oc While DLSS 3 has a frame generation (so a fake frames with optical flow) i could agree the other things! Yuzu Devs should making a Video Benchmark if the 4060 performs "worse" than the 3060 I dont know how people are still whining and went tantrum without proofs or other issues. The 4060 is really valid now
Concidering that from 1060 to 4060 we managed to only do 2x fps just shows you how much money they are trying to drain from you. the technology is so advanced they could give you so much more for such budget but for 10 years they sucked the 2060 and 3060 out of people until they got to 4060 which is only 2x performance from 1060... in my opinion every generation should 2x the last gen or its just plain stupid...
The major problem I have with the 4060 is the 128bit bus. This bus config was used on the XX50 series cards which is probably why some people call the 4060 a mislabeled 4050. While the extra cache on the die is supposed to make up for the low bus speeds, it only happens in specific instances and not in general. If they would have went with a 192bit bus this card would be something to talk about in this price range. I would never upgrade a 30 series to a 40 series ... at the 60 level ... because of the bus. It really makes a difference. For instance, the 3060 8g is around 17% slower than the 3060 12g because the 3060 8g has a 128bit bus compared to the 3060 12g 192bit bus. Imagine the 4060 with a 192bit bus plus the extra cache. At this price point they would sell out in a heartbeat. Best to wait until the 5XXX cards come out and see what's up there.
4060 uses the 107 die too, which has been historically the die that was used for xx50 class cards. So this was actually supposed to be the 4050 that ngreedia is trying to upsell as a 4060
Nvidia needs to stop selling 60 class and above cards with 8GB of VRAM for the next generation. 1080p ultra has been bumping into vram issues for over a year now in some games. 12 or 16GB needs to be the new standard minimum.
The 2060 and 3069 required 170 watts, while the 4060 and 1060 required less then 120 watts. That's what I wanted to see, if I get a.3060 will I need a new PSu.
Basically if youre upgrading from a 2060 below and looking for a 300 bucks card, go with 4060. I still see people saying the 3060 is a better card overall because of the vram, but in all honesty you wont be needing that if youre just playing at 1080p which is what these cards are designed for. Better dlss on the 4060 will give more frames as well.
I've upgraded from 2060 to 4060, i think it's worth cuz at least i can use ray tracing at 1080p (60fps), but it was 390$ cuz in my country gpu prices hella expensive and buying 4060 at this price not bad it would be 450 or more can u imagine. Also i like how power consumption of the 4060 is almost same with 1060 but that price damn...
@@jordaniansniper934 all rtx has dlss 3.0. only the 40 series have frame gen. if you just game, 4060 may be better than 3060ti with frame gen, but without, 3060ti beats it by a bit. If you do content creation like adobe, 3060ti leaves it to dust. Including the 4060ti.
One thing not mentioned is that the 3060 has 12gb vram. So, it's much better in the long run than the 4060. They are very similar in performance, but if you over cap the 4060's 8gb vram by maxing out everything in Ultra with 4k, the 3060 will blow it out of the water in performance.
@@valentinberrelleza you need good base framerate for FG to even work properly. If you have 20 FPS, it will be shitty even with FG. You would need at least 50-60 FPS for it to do something.
The 30 to 40 jump is kinda pointless but from 20 to 40 makes a bunch of sense. You'll probably be using less power on the 40 as well. The 40 gens get a bunch of hate but jumping one generation is for the less than 1% that actually want to upgrade every couple of years. That being said... I'm really looking forward to the 60 series. Maybe 50.
Im zweit Rechner reicht mir die gtx 1060 für Full HD noch aus.Doom 2016,Forza Motorsport 7,Forza Horizont 4,usw laufen noch gut mit 60-100fps,Grafik ist meist eine Stufe unter max.Destiny 2 läuft auch gut mit 60fps.Dirt 5 auf mittel so mit ca 50-60fps,da merkt man es fehlt.Aber egal.Der Pc ist immerhin 13 Jahre,und die GPU(Asus Turbo Gtx 1060 6gb ist ca 7,5 Jahre).Damals war es ein gewaltiger Boost bei der Grafik.Solange der Pc noch geht?Super Video.Wenn Ich eine neue GPU kaufen würde,immer 1 Gerneration überspringen,damit man auch einen gewaltigen Schub hat.Super Video😳😳👍
My best advice to you is don't burn your money. Sure it's an upgrade, but rtx 4060 is the absolute worst when it comes to price to performance ratio. 128 bus width, 8 GB of VRAM in 2023 for $399 is outright a scam. I'll give you 3 choices, you can listen to me or... don't. Your money, do whatever. RTX 3060 - Cheaper, 12 GB of VRAM. AMD RX 6700 XT - Cheaper than RTX 3070, is on par with RTX 3070 in performance, currently the best budget king. RTX 4070 - Probably out of your budget but still, i would much rather recommend this than the 4060 any time. If you do productivity, chase RTX and DLSS, then go with Nvidia, but absolutely skip 4060, that is my advice.
@@gateopssss Is the RX 6700XT around the same price as 4060? Also, @4a4arA I'd also recommend the 3060TI. It provides a visible FPS difference over the 3060 in some games
The 2060 puts in a respectable showing in. I loved my 1060, I'm sorry I sold though. I should have kept it as a back up when I bought the 3060. The 3060 puts in an admirable showing too.
I went from 1060 to 3060 and it's fine at the moment , if I was going to upgrade again I would go with the 4080 even know it's expensive for 1440p . The 3060 is fine at 1080 p in most games at 144 htrz . No point wasting money on a card unless it's going to do what you want it to do . Sure even the 3060 is lacking a bit at 1080 p in some regards . The novelty wheres off after a while , Iv used a 4090 before and it was smooth etc at 1440p . Definitely a noticeable difference in gaming on a beast as PC . I went back to mine at home and I was like well this is rather average , but not actually that bad at all . Getting a bit sick of video games lol .
@@mehDOGIESRATS2222 I bought a new 165 hz 2k monitor. I think the fps drop was about 50%. I think I'm avaraging around 100 fps in most games at med to high settings. Plenty enough for the next few years for me. I'm might get a socket 1700 cpu at some point to replace the i5 12400. It's on but I miss the i7 experience.
I have a 12400 also lol . Sucks about the fps , really need a beast to have high fps . My friends got a 7800 x3d , the fps are very good . But Id rather go with a intel lol . Are you running your games on a m.2 drive . Because the speed of your hard drive can effect your games I find . I need to buy one , when I put my PC together I thought it was a ssd , turned out to be a hard drive lol . So it's a bit shit . Motherboard fits a m.2 drive , haven't got round to buying one lol . Make sure you have xmp profile enabled for you ram speeds also in bios . You have to manually select the right speed also and save it . My flat doesn't even have his enabled the idiot rofl . And he plays on this huge 120 htrz 4 k tv lol . I tried to explain it to him one day .
@@mehDOGIESRATS2222 I'm running a gen 3 M.2 drive. I think the read speed is avout 4500m and the write is about 3500m.Thanks for the xmp tip i'l try that. Tbh, I haven't been to worried about the frame rate drop, I have a 2 monitor setup so I can swap at anytime! It's all good! 😁
@@longi625 th-cam.com/video/WDzrq5IxBX4/w-d-xo.html Might give you a few more fps lol . Another trick also is to turn the windows appearance down . Make sure you turn off all those windows apps etc and don't run steam or origin at the same time .
People often complain about Nvidia realeasing a 50 series card as a 60's, but forget that AMD gave them no competition with the RX 7600. They can price whatever they want, people are still going to buy if the red team keeps falling behind. Aside from the small price difference and 8GB Vram limitation on both, the RTX 4060 still offers much better performance per power consuption and, access to DLSS 3 technology with frame generation, which has no equivalent from the red team either. I got a RX 6600, btw.
En la generación rtx 4000 se enfocaron en lograr una alta eficiencia a costa de una poca mejora de fps, lo cual es algo bueno pero no muy atractivo para el consumidor.
2060 and above they doubled the wattage. Only now the 4060 & 4060Ti are extremely efficient. For instance, 1060 & 4060 consume the same power wattage but the performance is vast. In case I haven't had a 3060Ti or something happened to my GPU, I'd go to 4060Ti without a second thought, in spite all the negative comments about the performance. It performs very slightly better than a 3060Ti and in some cases it's a tie or even the 3060Ti very slightly better, but the efficiency of the 4060Ti is on the roof. Now, for my next GPU, no matter what, I'll simply go to 5060Ti. Those like me who always get the 3060 variations, only if you have older or God forbid, broke suddenly. Otherwise, wait for the 5060.
@@krustyegirl7334 I'm saying that I wish that the design strategy for the RTX cards were all capable to provide 60+ FPS. I know NVIDIA is just milking customers for business. It's possible, they just don't want to do it
I upgraded from 1060-6 to 3060-12 and the only case when I got advantage about 2.44 times wus Unigine Superposition bench extreme profile. 1.88 time in High profile and from 1.67 in games. Ryzen 5 3600X and it can be the bottleneck.
Там шина урезанная, но обращений к памяти по этой шине раза в 2 меньше. Кеш эту карту спасает и делает дешевле. Конечно шина лучше 256. Но с кешем 128 и 192 не особо будет разница
the jump from 1060 to 2060 is not impressive at all, because a lot more fps, but a lot more watts. the jump from 2060 to 3060 is kinda impressive, because same watts but more fps. the jump from 3060 to 4060 is most impressive, because a lot less watts but STILL more fps!
So the technical process has become much thinner, the watts consumed are technologies, you better focus on the gpu frequency - 4060 - 2700MHz, 3060 - 1800MHz, 50% of the frequency difference gives only 10-15% in performance.
I only just upgraded from a 660TI to a 2060, and I'm still using running an i7 3770k@4.7ghz in a PC i built in 2012/13. I get shit sometimes for refusing to upgrade but it still works and plays everything I need it to including the latest games im interested in so why bother building a new one until i absolutely have to?
I think everyone was so engrossed with the performance difference between the 3060 and 4060 that everyone failed to notice the almost same power draw on the 4060 as the 1060. You're not SAVING money by buying the 3060 because you will be spending a lot more on your consumption. You cannot talk about money savings if you're not taking into consideration the power savings. 60W per frame per hour , you do the math and tell me if the 3060 is cheaper and better
who gives a shit about power consumption lmao performance is what matters. power consumption is literally the argument you go to when you realise the card is 💩 and have nothing else to argue
@@pravnav The cards are fine. You must be way over in your head to think the cards are shit. Nobody is crying about that, they're all crying about how expensive they are and they're not wrong. And obviously you have no idea what you are talking about when you say who cares about power consumption. It's a very idiotic comment.
My undervolted 3060 runs at around 100W most of the time i'm gaming so yeah.. you just gotta invest a little time to save money.. I doubt 4060 can be undervolted as much as 3060.
Had the 4060 been a 12gb like the 3060, it would have been a good GPU, but it's improvement ranges from little to none and has 4gb less which is kind of a problem
Underrated: The power consumption (W / FPS). Roughly the data for MS Flight simulator GTX 1060: 3,8 RTX 2060: 3,3 RTX 3060: 2,75 RTX 4060: 1,65 There was a big leap in efficiency from 3060 to 4060 you can see in all game comparisons.
80-100% increase from 1060 to 2060, 30-50% increase from 2060 to 3060, and less than 10% increase from 3060 to 4060. Conclusion, if you have a 1060, it's absolutely worth to upgrade to a 2060, and if you have a 3060, it would be a waste of money upgrading to a 4060.
RTX 3060 is the new undisputed underdog champion after the legend GTX 1060! Nvidia should have never made this bad boy. I have one and I feel it will last till 2025! RIP RTX 4 series.
also keep in mind,these numbers are @ Max settings,with DLSS turned off. so you can expect a 25-40% performance increase depending on the graphics settings,and/or DLSS turned on
I got a gaming laptop with 4060 for 700 on Cyber Monday. I play on medium settings at 1080p, capped fps at 60 with only dlss and Frame Gen enabled. The interesting I learned is that ultra and medium looks the same if you compare the video side by side. 😅
The fact that the .1% lows were better for the 3060 than the 4060 in quite a few places is just sad. More frames for the 4060? Barely, but that .1% tells you it's a smoother experience on the 3060. Nvidia is quickly turning into the Apple of the x86 world. The 60 series will be codenamed Macintosh.........
ey, 1 question man. If you choose en RDR2, refresh rate 60hz, how damn you got more fps in the test? cause when i configured that , i had always 60fps maximum, so, where i wrong? PD: test in 1080p, not fair for 3060 and 4060, better in 2K at least.
4060 is more like 3060TI with lower consumption. 4060 should be more power. 4060 outperform 3060 around 10-15%, while 2060 is nearly 100% stronger than 1060.
Games :
Remnant 2 - 0:19
Forza Horizon 5 - 1:10 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesForza5
God of War - 2:16 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesGoWPC
CYBERPUNK 2077 - 3:15 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesCP2077
Hogwarts Legacy - 4:27 - gvo.deals/TG3HogwartsLegacy
Red Dead Redemption 2 - 5:37 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesRDR2
The Last of Us Part I - 6:47
Microsoft Flight Simulator - 7:52 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesMFS20
System:
Windows 11 - bit.ly/3nLcltK
Core i9-13900K - bit.ly/3SgY3xf
ASUS ROG Strix Z790-E Gaming - bit.ly/3scEZpc
G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB 32GB DDR5 6000MHz - bit.ly/3XlBGdU
CPU Cooler - MSI MAG CORELIQUID C360 - bit.ly/3mOVgiy
GeForce GTX 1060 6GB - bit.ly/3lEMa5G
GeForce RTX 2060 6GB - bit.ly/3yiWtBW
GeForce RTX 3060 12GB - bit.ly/3pUvfML
GeForce RTX 4060 8GB - bit.ly/3CRMGqh
SSD - 2xSAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB - bit.ly/2NmWeQe
Power Supply CORSAIR RM850i 850W - bit.ly/3i2VoGI
Great comparison !!
What I feel it's missing is productive GPU intensive software like Davinci Resolve Studio and Topaz Video AI (it uses AI tensor cores). This would get video editors attention ;)
nice
@@AntonioYuMarques The clue is in the channel name , "Testing Games".
Why did you use the 1060 when there is the 1660? That would have been a better comparison. IMO
would be curious, instead of different games, how does it change if we include: FSR, dlss and fg ???
The jump from the 1060 to the 2060 was bigger than jumping two generations (2060 to 4060)
yes but keep in mind there was also a big increase in watts from 1060 to 2060. i wouldnt really call an increase in wattage a generational improvement. you obviously get more fps with more watts.
Gtx 1060 to rtx 2060 is a two year jump.
U forgot gtx 1660.
@@nurag_s every generation is a 2 year jump. The gtx 1660 is not the sequel to the 1060, the gtx 16 series was within the same generation of the 20 series
i am junp from 1060 to 6600 -_-
@user-zw1oy5pm3s I am become jumper of GPUs, destroyer of wallets
So we went from a ~40% improvement, to a ~20% improvement, to a ~13% improvement. Can’t wait to see the 5% higher frames for $150 more dollars on the 5060!!
Seriously, I believe this is a ploy by Nvidia to sell their older graphics card stock because the older cards are better frames/dollar spent. Pathetic to see Nvidia taking this route.
Sure, but the 4060 is about 20% cheaper adjusted for inflation, compared to the 3060, so in terms of performance per dollar, it's not just 13%.
it's not 40%, it's 80-100%, it's almost double the framerate or 200%, that is an increase of 100%... 40% improvement would be 30 to 42FPS but its 58 to 62
Yeah yeah, because it's so easy to get 40% performance uplifts all the time, it's not like there's the issue of diminishing returns, die and overall size, transistor density, thermal and power consumption constraints, massive changes in architecture needed, new tech, compatibility issues... nah, they just need to wish it into existence and poof! Magic happens! (not defending Ngreedia or any other company, just saying, keep your expectations low or prepare to be disappointed)
I mean, the MSRP is lower than both the 2060 and 3060 and on par with the 1060. Right now a 4060 is 20-30$ cheaper than what a 1060 would have cost me in 2019 at the time of the RTX 20 cards coming out.
I remember how many complaints I saw that the 2060 is an overpriced junk, same with the 3060 on release.
Then again, most of the cards people say are awesome were considered waste of money on release.
😂haha
El salto que hubo de GTX a RTX fue enorme!
Por esa razón era que cuando salió la serie 20 yo solo deseaba la 2060 porque era una 1070 que hasta casi rendía una 1080 y con RayTracing ahora que estudio sistemas es muy buena incluso porque me ayuda en la programación gracias a la IA
Thank you for bringing our beloved gtx 1060 into comparisons.
I jumped from a 1060 3gb to a 4090. It was like jumping to another galaxy.
Shit i just uesing gtx750😢😢
Bruh@@HotFiya05
@@HotFiya05 which CPU and RAM u paired it with?
@@HotFiya05 dont tell me that you paired the 4090 with a 3200g
The power consumption on 40 series is impressive. It may not be that much faster than 3060, but that’s still something. My 1660 is still holding up and will proibsbly upgrade when 5060 comes out in couple years
I am in the same boat, 1660 super looking for an upgrade.
You could get AMD
@@MightyWolve unless you are playing Starfield, the 1660 super is still fine for 1080p medium-ish settings
Who cares
yup, since it's using the die and power consumption that is typically used on a 50 series card. It's essentially a 4050 mislabeled so they can justify charging $300. The desktop 4050 was slated to launch back in June. It's now October and they still haven't mentioned what happened to it, unless they are unofficially conceding that the 4060 was in fact the true 4050. They weren't able to get away with the 4070ti being called a 4080 12gb but they probably think the lower the stack you go, the less likely anyone will notice or care.
big difference between 1060 and 2060
GTX vs. RTX is normal, the technology is not at all the same 🙂👍
@@piranhax3396 what haha. they just named it rtx because of rt which wasnt even shown in this video. has nothing to do with rtx
@@theplayerofus319 the card itself is called RTX 2060, I wanted to talk about the name of the card, not the technique that the card allows to achieve, because precisely I said that the RTX have a significant improvement in performance compared to the GTX 😁
@@piranhax3396 no. The jump from the gtx 1080ti to the rtx 2080ti Was way smaller than from rtx 2080ti to rtx 3080ti. So i just wanted to say the namens has nothing to do with it. Its a normal generational upgrade just with added rt and dlss components
@@piranhax3396 RTX is only for RT and DLSS. Nothing to do with pure raster performance
How crazy, does the 4060 have little difference in performance compared to the 3060 (except the consumption, which is lower), nvidia holding cards evolution (or would it be naming the cards wrong?)? Anyway, I'm going to stay on my 3060 a while longer, it's working great for me
because its actually a 4050 with a 4060 sticker on it.
@@bb5307 🎯
@@bb5307 but 1060 has same power consumption like 4060... maybe it is a 60 card and the cards befor were a higher tier 🤔
the 40 series doesnt have that much of a performance increase over the 30 series but if you wanna max out settings and use dlss3 fg then you'll be able to play with raytracing in a games that you couldnt before but not worth it in general atm since not too many games support fg yet
Your 3060 is outdated
preventing kids from saying first
😂😂
A hero we deserve.
These type of comment is not better either
50th like!
Yeah we adults need to stick together.
Got to love the power consumption of the 4060.
If only the price was lower.
In middle europe 3060 cost 329 USD and 4060 338 USD
When it drops to 225e it will be nice for 1080p, even with that ridicolous 128 bit bus
@@XMoldyMe 300$ middle east
@@GFE. That's a good price considering they're selling 3050 for $292-300.
brother, on amazon the 3060 costs 290 dollars and the 4060 costs 310 dollars
The 4050 is hands down the most impressive GPU, it is a lot more efficient than the 3060 while beating it by a bit. Nvidia should lower the price for this 4050 soon, and I'd buy it if they do, $300 is just too much for a 50-class GPU.
А кому похер на энергоэффективность ????
Все 60 модели не стоили 300+-$ а эта стоит !!!!! 🤔😕
@@mikhmikhser вообще, то что 4060 жрёт порядка 100-120 вт и греется до 50-60° даёт большой потенциал для разгона. А также благодаря этому можно взять самый простой палит с 1 кулером, и всё равно всё будет в очень хороших рамках. У меня 3060 8гб с одним вентилятором греется до 70°, не выше, а тут вообще тихоня будет
You mean 4060? It's not in this video. You typed 50 3x. The 4060 actually performs MUCH worse than the 3060 in any game that utilizes a lot of VRAM, because the 4060 only has 8GB while the 3060 has 12GB. Seriously gets half of the framerate sometimes.
@@CptBrian the 4060 in this video is just a 4050 named a tier up and priced a tier up
@@CptBrian can you link to a video for proof?
You can change your graphics card to a 10-year cycle to feel dramatic I used 1060 until yesterday and changed it to 4060 today. It's truly a new world
xD man, for 3 frames more u pay around 100$ 3060 would have been a better deal for u... also i dont get you nvidia buyers.. ur sort of a cult.. amd is there too and in way better prices for hd monitors... unless u play at least 1440p or 4k... amd is better... nvidia is more for dlss and if u care rtx
@@deaddarkones1089You seems amd fan ...
@@PhantomLarry not necesarely, i just dont want to spend the most i can for most i can recive, i care more for value not performance! that said i do care about performance but at the same time i keep the value perspective in mind! i have had nvidia graphics cards in the past but these days amd seems no brainer to me!
@@deaddarkones1089 feels somewhat true... But still you get handful of softwares with nvidia ...
Amd lags a lot in laptop department with their GPUs
@@PhantomLarry laptops were never my thing so i was not talking about these
Comparing 4060 vs 3060 I can see why some are disappointed, but against 2060 improvement is quite significant, plus lower power consumption. The only good thing about 3060 is just more vram, but that's it. 4060 is superior in any other aspect.
3060 superior in price
@@jacksbatsgaming a 4060 is at most $20 more expensive than a 3060. the 4060 is the better buy
Nice to see! Biggest win on the 40-serie over the 30-serie is not really the 'slightly more' frames, but it uses clearly Less Power!. On average around 50 Watts. Thats good I guess.
Just hope on the 50-series they dont just put in more power to get more frames.... stick to the less power solutions please.
u can undervolt any card to achieve low power example u can make a 6700xt draw 130w from 200w(default) and lose about 3/5% performance
if you care about power consumption 4060 is pretty good tho , but not really worth upgrade from 3060, depend what you need.
Bcoz it's a 50 class GPU with 60 class name tag
If you are upgrading from the 3060 then you should go for 3080, 4070 or better.
I get everyone's issue with the little amount of uplift FPS wise from the 3060 to the 4060, there have certainly been far better jumps in 60 class GPUS. But I at least like the direction they've gone with power draw. It was a concern of mine with the Turing and Ampere based cards, though I'm sure I'm one of very few. As for the $300 price tag, that's not too bad either, I think the 1060 was about 249 or 299? even at 249, adjusted for modern inflation it's a fair price, and CHEAPER than both the 2060 and 3060 (if you actually could get one for msrp.) There are other things to like about the card other than FPS numbers.
no there are not, upgrading a GPU consists specifically in getting more performance, getting higher fps, getting more brute force, things like, watt consumption, software features, DLSS, ray-tracing, all these things should be secondary elements, the energy bill difference is inconspicuous when we're talking about a 100W, 80W difference on GPUs
@@evermartin3364 AHH I see your point it's not worth the upgrade if you already have a 3060 but as for me I'm only building my first ever pc and a 4060 ti being alot cheaper than a 306o for those of us that don't already have PC's and a looking to build one capable of handling everything well in 1080p 100+FPS high settings that won't send us into bankruptcy the 4060 was made for us, but I get why people who already have PC's with 3060 or something in that performance range are hating so much on the 4060 though you could always sell your graphics card and buy a 4060 you'll get a slight performance increase and you might even have money left over who knows
@@KyleC3577i mean, you're partly right, but even people that do not own a pc and its going to build their first one will be affected in the future, we're talking about the first nvidia generation that the 4070 ti gpu costs 800 dollars, and that same 4070 ti would cost 1199 and would be released as a 4080 if the community havent pressed nvidia, and the first generations that the final 70 gpus are the weakest comparing to the high end of its own generation, if things keeps going like this, the next 2-3 generations will have the most expensive final 60 gpus with the weakest performance comparing to the high end,
"power draw" except you can undervolt 3060 to draw less than 120W at those clock speeds. So the improvement is more or less just 15% at the same power with 4GB less VRAM.
As far as I'm concerned. I wish we could match the 3060 power consumption on the 4060 so we could get the performance jump we needed.
That is the only way Nvidia can fix this mess.
This really shows you how nVidia is playing with RTX 4000 Series. The Delta between RTX 3060 and RTX 4060 is actually Smallest Generational Gap of the 4 Cards. Because RTX 4060 is basically what should be called RTX 4050TI. Even worse with RTX 4070.
with dlss 3 fg it beats them by twice the fps
@@sebekgra8416frame gen isn’t in every game and the amount of input lag is pretty noticeable and not good
@@waterhigh Frame Gen with a base of 60 fps is good, the input lag isn't that noticeable.
@@sebekgra8416DLSS 3 would be cheating the results. Also, it isn't good at all. I say that as a 4090 owner.
No, the 4060 is really a 4050. The 4060ti is the real 4050ti. Same goes for the 4070 being the real 4060.
I still find it sad how little improvement we really saw from the 3060 to 4060.
Just a shame how pricey the 30 series cards still are....
Wdym? The power consumption difference is enormous
@@boltmaX its 4050 card named as a 4060
there is not a 4050 dude u got 4060/80/90 @@مختصرقصير
Get a life then? Problem solved, go touch grass instead of being such a pathetic consoomer desperate for new product
difference in saving money
Rtx 2060 is actually a beast in terms of price/performance
Unfortunately the 6 GB of VRAM are not enough for High/ultra textures in 1080p nowadays (textures Is the most important setting in my opinion) so it lose its meaning because It can't deliver a stable framerate with good textures.
Something like an RX 6600 or a rtx 2060 super would be better (8 GB of VRAM are a must nowadays).
@@dizesias There was an RTX2060 12GB model.
@@s0cks1985 yeah but this video Is about the 6 GB model.
Other than that even the 12 GB model Is not worth It because nowadays the RX 6000 have very low prices in comoarisons to the rtx.
@@dizesias что за бред ты несешь?) 6 памяти вполне хватает для 1080 качества во многих играх
3060 is a gigachad. 🗿 Costs noticably less than 4060 where I live, 192 bit and 12 GB.
I live in Russia, here 4060 costs the same as 3060 and sometimes even cheaper
1060 to 2060 was a very nice jump. Also 2060 did bring a lot of excellent new technologies like dlss, ray tracing, VRS, better dx 12 and vulkan support. 3060 and 4060 were awful.
3060 has 12gb tho..... is basically 1080 Ti level of performance.
What about the jump from 3090 to 4090 and 3080 to 4080?
The performance increase(compared to RTX 3000) of the xx80 and xx90 this series has been the highest compared to the whole lineup. There are videos out there showcasing this
@@BillGates_Alexyeah, it was a price jump of $1400 to $1600, and from $699 to $1299. Doesn't matter if it performs great, they're both insane, the 4090 is in a league of its own. But the price to performance is enough to push buyers away.
2060 had increased MSRP, brutal TDP increase and same VRAM over the 1060. 3060 had same MSRP, minimal TDP increase and twice the VRAM.
And people thought the 2000 series wasn't a good enough improvement..
differences between 1060 and 2060 is a good. but after 2 gen (3060&4060)... not that differences...
Мы забыли о 1660
Есть 1080ti😊
Спасибо, очень интересное сравнение! 🥞
At the time, many people made fun of the people who bought the 2000 series. But coupled with the great drought of GPUs of 2021 and the meager improvements of some 4000 series, I think they got the last laugh.
I agree. Looking back the 2060 got a ton of hate but it’s held up pretty good. I just saw one sell for 90 dollars on ebay, quite the bargain.
Still mad at myself for not buying a 1080Ti back in 2017 for $700. Looking back it was insane value that still performs well today.
Nvidia started neglecting the 60 series cards last generation, focusing on corporate greed and deceptive marketing practices. The fact that were pinning a disguised "4060" against last generations mainstream option is beyond funny!
Yes why did it take so long for a 60 series card to come out
The 128 bit bus is enough for me to steer clear of the 4060 / 4060 Ti especially if you care about using emulators where graphic memory bandwidth is important, the Yuzu dev's even put out a warning about this (google 4060 Yuzu). Nvidia knows they screwed up here which is why they're talking 512 bit bus for the higher end 50 series models.
128 bits and pcie x8...
Meh i dont care what yuzu means, i find the 4060 rtx totally valid. Ryujinx is not mention about 4060 which is fine. Yuzu can make a video or testing a benchmark vs the older card and then making a "sTaTeMEnt"
Is the 4080 and 4090 good for emulators?
The 4060 has enough 128-bit bus, as this video proves.
The gap between 4060 and 3060 is almost the same as between 2060 and 3060, I don't understand why everyone is whining. And plus 4060 has DLSS3. People threw a tantrum from scratch.
@@Aleksey-vd9oc While DLSS 3 has a frame generation (so a fake frames with optical flow) i could agree the other things!
Yuzu Devs should making a Video Benchmark if the 4060 performs "worse" than the 3060
I dont know how people are still whining and went tantrum without proofs or other issues. The 4060 is really valid now
Concidering that from 1060 to 4060 we managed to only do 2x fps just shows you how much money they are trying to drain from you.
the technology is so advanced they could give you so much more for such budget but for 10 years they sucked the 2060 and 3060 out of people until they got to 4060 which is only 2x performance from 1060... in my opinion every generation should 2x the last gen or its just plain stupid...
The major problem I have with the 4060 is the 128bit bus. This bus config was used on the XX50 series cards which is probably why some people call the 4060 a mislabeled 4050. While the extra cache on the die is supposed to make up for the low bus speeds, it only happens in specific instances and not in general. If they would have went with a 192bit bus this card would be something to talk about in this price range.
I would never upgrade a 30 series to a 40 series ... at the 60 level ... because of the bus. It really makes a difference. For instance, the 3060 8g is around 17% slower than the 3060 12g because the 3060 8g has a 128bit bus compared to the 3060 12g 192bit bus. Imagine the 4060 with a 192bit bus plus the extra cache. At this price point they would sell out in a heartbeat. Best to wait until the 5XXX cards come out and see what's up there.
Yes they wont be doing that because the greed company wanted you to pay $600 to get a real 4000 series card. Greed company at its finest
4060 uses the 107 die too, which has been historically the die that was used for xx50 class cards. So this was actually supposed to be the 4050 that ngreedia is trying to upsell as a 4060
Nvidia needs to stop selling 60 class and above cards with 8GB of VRAM for the next generation. 1080p ultra has been bumping into vram issues for over a year now in some games. 12 or 16GB needs to be the new standard minimum.
What is this data viewing software? MSI afterburner?
GTX 1660: And I took that personally
You must do this whit all the generations of GPUs that exist until the date
2016:
1060 advertised for 1080p gaming 250 usd, 1080 advertised for 4k gaming 500 usd
2023:
4060 advertised for 1080p gaming 500 usd, 4080 advertised for 4k gaming 1000 usd
2030:
7060 advertised for 1080p gaming 1000 usd, 7080 advertised for 4k 2000 usd.
WTF is going on?
well tbf 1080p has gotten far more demanding too but i get you
Проблема не в Nvidia, проблема в долларе 😂
Inflation
AAA games getting more resource hungry. Tbf optimized titles run really well on a $700-$800 build still.
4060 is like 300-320$ idk where you got 500$ from
The 2060 and 3069 required 170 watts, while the 4060 and 1060 required less then 120 watts. That's what I wanted to see, if I get a.3060 will I need a new PSu.
Tq for doing this man... Now I know. Which card to upgrade form my 1060
looks like the environment is very tiring for me, they only do well only after i got angry which like lul, not so important?
Basically if youre upgrading from a 2060 below and looking for a 300 bucks card, go with 4060. I still see people saying the 3060 is a better card overall because of the vram, but in all honesty you wont be needing that if youre just playing at 1080p which is what these cards are designed for. Better dlss on the 4060 will give more frames as well.
I've upgraded from 2060 to 4060, i think it's worth cuz at least i can use ray tracing at 1080p (60fps), but it was 390$ cuz in my country gpu prices hella expensive and buying 4060 at this price not bad it would be 450 or more can u imagine.
Also i like how power consumption of the 4060 is almost same with 1060 but that price damn...
@Ewpatiy_Kolovratcuz their performance is nearly the same, 4060 is using much less Energy, its more recent and has dlss 3.0?
@@jordaniansniper934 all rtx has dlss 3.0. only the 40 series have frame gen. if you just game, 4060 may be better than 3060ti with frame gen, but without, 3060ti beats it by a bit. If you do content creation like adobe, 3060ti leaves it to dust. Including the 4060ti.
Hello, what is the software showing system info and fps on the screen?
Msi Afterburner as i remember.
@@DaddyWesker Thank you
One thing not mentioned is that the 3060 has 12gb vram. So, it's much better in the long run than the 4060. They are very similar in performance, but if you over cap the 4060's 8gb vram by maxing out everything in Ultra with 4k, the 3060 will blow it out of the water in performance.
4060 has fg , 3060 Will not even run new titles properly even with 12gb
Maxing out at 4k with a 3060? Pointless. Am I trying to see some slideshow?
@@valentinberrelleza you need good base framerate for FG to even work properly. If you have 20 FPS, it will be shitty even with FG. You would need at least 50-60 FPS for it to do something.
The 12gb on 3060 ist a joke and there to trigger people to buy the raster performance of 3060 is not high enough to use this 12 gb
@@valorantstreamerguy91 I'm using all 12 gigs most of time at 1440p and its not even enough in lots of cases so what's your point?
Tell me the tool and setting of measuring those details you used.
The 30 to 40 jump is kinda pointless but from 20 to 40 makes a bunch of sense. You'll probably be using less power on the 40 as well. The 40 gens get a bunch of hate but jumping one generation is for the less than 1% that actually want to upgrade every couple of years.
That being said... I'm really looking forward to the 60 series. Maybe 50.
The 4060ti is within error in performance compared to the 3060ti. So if you want to pay $50 more and a cut down bus, that's on you.
@@TonyChan-eh3nz Which video card is being beneficial in your opinion?
Im zweit Rechner reicht mir die gtx 1060 für Full HD noch aus.Doom 2016,Forza Motorsport 7,Forza Horizont 4,usw laufen noch gut mit 60-100fps,Grafik ist meist eine Stufe unter max.Destiny 2 läuft auch gut mit 60fps.Dirt 5 auf mittel so mit ca 50-60fps,da merkt man es fehlt.Aber egal.Der Pc ist immerhin 13 Jahre,und die GPU(Asus Turbo Gtx 1060 6gb ist ca 7,5 Jahre).Damals war es ein gewaltiger Boost bei der Grafik.Solange der Pc noch geht?Super Video.Wenn Ich eine neue GPU kaufen würde,immer 1 Gerneration überspringen,damit man auch einen gewaltigen Schub hat.Super Video😳😳👍
If this trend continues, the 5060 will only be 5% faster than the 4060.
which app you are using for monitoring system performance?
Rtx 2060 still a legend
From generation to generation, we received + 30-60% performance for the same price. But now they want twice as much money for the same performance.
Tenho uma RTX 2060 de 12gb, gostei dos comparativos. Bom saber que minha plaquinha da um caldinho ainda. haha
Which program are you using to get these benchmarks???
Looking forward to change my 1060 with 4060 next month!
My best advice to you is don't burn your money. Sure it's an upgrade, but rtx 4060 is the absolute worst when it comes to price to performance ratio. 128 bus width, 8 GB of VRAM in 2023 for $399 is outright a scam.
I'll give you 3 choices, you can listen to me or... don't. Your money, do whatever.
RTX 3060 - Cheaper, 12 GB of VRAM.
AMD RX 6700 XT - Cheaper than RTX 3070, is on par with RTX 3070 in performance, currently the best budget king.
RTX 4070 - Probably out of your budget but still, i would much rather recommend this than the 4060 any time.
If you do productivity, chase RTX and DLSS, then go with Nvidia, but absolutely skip 4060, that is my advice.
@@gateopssss Is the RX 6700XT around the same price as 4060? Also, @4a4arA I'd also recommend the 3060TI. It provides a visible FPS difference over the 3060 in some games
There are much better gpus out there for a much better price. 6700xt cost the same price, offers more VRAM, more performance and you can play 1440p.
@@trippinhard250 Depends what country, 6700xt is cheaper by $30 than the 4060 for me.
Look forward on keeping your money for something worth upgrading.
The 2060 puts in a respectable showing in. I loved my 1060, I'm sorry I sold though. I should have kept it as a back up when I bought the 3060. The 3060 puts in an admirable showing too.
I went from 1060 to 3060 and it's fine at the moment , if I was going to upgrade again I would go with the 4080 even know it's expensive for 1440p . The 3060 is fine at 1080 p in most games at 144 htrz . No point wasting money on a card unless it's going to do what you want it to do . Sure even the 3060 is lacking a bit at 1080 p in some regards . The novelty wheres off after a while , Iv used a 4090 before and it was smooth etc at 1440p . Definitely a noticeable difference in gaming on a beast as PC . I went back to mine at home and I was like well this is rather average , but not actually that bad at all . Getting a bit sick of video games lol .
@@mehDOGIESRATS2222 I bought a new 165 hz 2k monitor. I think the fps drop was about 50%. I think I'm avaraging around 100 fps in most games at med to high settings. Plenty enough for the next few years for me. I'm might get a socket 1700 cpu at some point to replace the i5 12400. It's on but I miss the i7 experience.
I have a 12400 also lol . Sucks about the fps , really need a beast to have high fps . My friends got a 7800 x3d , the fps are very good . But Id rather go with a intel lol . Are you running your games on a m.2 drive . Because the speed of your hard drive can effect your games I find . I need to buy one , when I put my PC together I thought it was a ssd , turned out to be a hard drive lol . So it's a bit shit . Motherboard fits a m.2 drive , haven't got round to buying one lol . Make sure you have xmp profile enabled for you ram speeds also in bios . You have to manually select the right speed also and save it . My flat doesn't even have his enabled the idiot rofl . And he plays on this huge 120 htrz 4 k tv lol . I tried to explain it to him one day .
@@mehDOGIESRATS2222 I'm running a gen 3 M.2 drive. I think the read speed is avout 4500m and the write is about 3500m.Thanks for the xmp tip i'l try that. Tbh, I haven't been to worried about the frame rate drop, I have a 2 monitor setup so I can swap at anytime! It's all good! 😁
@@longi625 th-cam.com/video/WDzrq5IxBX4/w-d-xo.html Might give you a few more fps lol . Another trick also is to turn the windows appearance down . Make sure you turn off all those windows apps etc and don't run steam or origin at the same time .
Those who upgraded from gtx 1060 to rtx 3060 did a good thing.
one good thing to note about that 4060 is the power draw though, it may seem like shit performance jumps but damn that is one really good improvement
People often complain about Nvidia realeasing a 50 series card as a 60's, but forget that AMD gave them no competition with the RX 7600. They can price whatever they want, people are still going to buy if the red team keeps falling behind.
Aside from the small price difference and 8GB Vram limitation on both, the RTX 4060 still offers much better performance per power consuption and, access to DLSS 3 technology with frame generation, which has no equivalent from the red team either.
I got a RX 6600, btw.
upgraded from 1050 Ti to 4060 is really big difference
when people buy 3060 in mining year, i think they can get 4070 or 4070 TI or RX 6900 XT in 2023
The high-peak price of 3060 in mining year can get you at least a 4080TI this year, at more than 1200 USD. Funny right?
En la generación rtx 4000 se enfocaron en lograr una alta eficiencia a costa de una poca mejora de fps, lo cual es algo bueno pero no muy atractivo para el consumidor.
2060 and above they doubled the wattage. Only now the 4060 & 4060Ti are extremely efficient. For instance, 1060 & 4060 consume the same power wattage but the performance is vast.
In case I haven't had a 3060Ti or something happened to my GPU, I'd go to 4060Ti without a second thought, in spite all the negative comments about the performance. It performs very slightly better than a 3060Ti and in some cases it's a tie or even the 3060Ti very slightly better, but the efficiency of the 4060Ti is on the roof. Now, for my next GPU, no matter what, I'll simply go to 5060Ti.
Those like me who always get the 3060 variations, only if you have older or God forbid, broke suddenly. Otherwise, wait for the 5060.
I just wished that every RTX card is able to perform 60 FPS at a minimum
Maybe don't use ultra settings
@@krustyegirl7334 I'm saying that I wish that the design strategy for the RTX cards were all capable to provide 60+ FPS. I know NVIDIA is just milking customers for business. It's possible, they just don't want to do it
@@Havii In general, is there a business that does not milk its customers?
Which one do you suggest for a Ryzen 7 5700G, Not so low, not so low, not so high, something in between.
I upgraded from 1060-6 to 3060-12 and the only case when I got advantage about 2.44 times wus Unigine Superposition bench extreme profile. 1.88 time in High profile and from 1.67 in games. Ryzen 5 3600X and it can be the bottleneck.
А если в 2 к разрешении когда пропускной способности шины не будет хватать и 8 гиг памяти? А еще и на PCI-E 3,0 как у меня тогда что делать с 4060?
Там шина урезанная, но обращений к памяти по этой шине раза в 2 меньше. Кеш эту карту спасает и делает дешевле. Конечно шина лучше 256. Но с кешем 128 и 192 не особо будет разница
I'm gonna buy the 3060 12GB instead of 4060 8GB lol
Get 3060ti at least
3060 is not that far from 2060 it's a shame to be called an upgrade
Get rx 6650xt its like inbetween of rtx 3060 and 3060 ti and its cheaper
@@Lee_Everett660 No, I need the Vram. It's future proof.
not a smart purchase if you ask me. i would rather look for amd alternatives or maybe a 3060ti atleast.
The 40 series power usage are crazy low, almost touching the 10 series card but with 2x or more the fps
the jump from 1060 to 2060 is not impressive at all, because a lot more fps, but a lot more watts.
the jump from 2060 to 3060 is kinda impressive, because same watts but more fps.
the jump from 3060 to 4060 is most impressive, because a lot less watts but STILL more fps!
So the technical process has become much thinner, the watts consumed are technologies, you better focus on the gpu frequency -
4060 - 2700MHz, 3060 - 1800MHz, 50% of the frequency difference gives only 10-15% in performance.
I only just upgraded from a 660TI to a 2060, and I'm still using running an i7 3770k@4.7ghz in a PC i built in 2012/13. I get shit sometimes for refusing to upgrade but it still works and plays everything I need it to including the latest games im interested in so why bother building a new one until i absolutely have to?
Wow incredible uplift from rtx 3060 to rtx 4060, nvidia you did a great job kept it up 🎉
The best results are in doom eternal. 😂
160 watts vs 100...
yes
can you make a video of RTX 4060 to show the benchmark of Automatic 1111(stable diffusion) or comfy UI?
For me energy saving is important. The RTX 4050/60/70 is very attractive for its performance and efficiency, it just needs a lower price.
It is
even the 4080 needs to go low cause its only with 16gb Ram unlike the 4090 that has 24gb tho that card costs a fortune
The conclusion is that the cooling system of the 30 series GPU is the best LMAO
2060💪
1060❤
I love that they update this test all the time
1080 é uma guerreira. Embora o teste seja em ultra ele deve rodar de boa em Médio e Alto os jogos atuais.
I think everyone was so engrossed with the performance difference between the 3060 and 4060 that everyone failed to notice the almost same power draw on the 4060 as the 1060. You're not SAVING money by buying the 3060 because you will be spending a lot more on your consumption. You cannot talk about money savings if you're not taking into consideration the power savings. 60W per frame per hour , you do the math and tell me if the 3060 is cheaper and better
who gives a shit about power consumption lmao performance is what matters. power consumption is literally the argument you go to when you realise the card is 💩 and have nothing else to argue
@@pravnav The cards are fine. You must be way over in your head to think the cards are shit. Nobody is crying about that, they're all crying about how expensive they are and they're not wrong. And obviously you have no idea what you are talking about when you say who cares about power consumption. It's a very idiotic comment.
My undervolted 3060 runs at around 100W most of the time i'm gaming so yeah.. you just gotta invest a little time to save money.. I doubt 4060 can be undervolted as much as 3060.
Pick up RTX 3060 pretty good I got one
My RTX still rocks @1080 max settings with DLSS in all new games
Sorry but the 4060 is ridiclious🤦🏻♂️
Absolutely not worthy to upgrade from a 3060
Even the efficiency isnt so bad at 3060
These actual framerate increases between the 20 Series and 40 Series are *BEYOND* depressing.
Nah I would still picking up 3060 12GB over 4060 8GB lamo.
No DLSS3 for you then
And i'd choose RX 6700 non XT instead of 3060 12gb LOL
@@chovekb no DLSS3 for you too.
@@jonelbondyingnuezca742 i used it its garbage tbh the input lag and visual downgrade are horrible
@@theplayerofus319 lag is very minimal about mili seconds.
what is the name of the application used to see the performance?
MSI Afterburner
I think my 3060 still enough
Had the 4060 been a 12gb like the 3060, it would have been a good GPU, but it's improvement ranges from little to none and has 4gb less which is kind of a problem
More like RTX 4050. It's using AD107 which is the die that Nvidia always used for the XX50 class GPUs.
Underrated: The power consumption (W / FPS).
Roughly the data for MS Flight simulator
GTX 1060: 3,8
RTX 2060: 3,3
RTX 3060: 2,75
RTX 4060: 1,65
There was a big leap in efficiency from 3060 to 4060 you can see in all game comparisons.
this is sad
Not at all
Indeed
What is the resolution of display?
The 4060 is a failure for sure. The 3060 is the most balanced and coolest
No DLSS3 for you then
@@jonelbondyingnuezca742 let me guess you comment that now because you bought this crap card and want to justifie it now?
@@theplayerofus319 i love it, 4060ti is a great card, no regrets. No need to replace my 600 watt PSU.
@@jonelbondyingnuezca742 3060 have dlss2, that's enough...
@@sandrosfc DLSS2 is outdated
Now I have 1660 super. Do you think it's worth buying a 4070 ti for a 13700KF processor?
what program do you use to make those graphics charts? 07:50
80-100% increase from 1060 to 2060, 30-50% increase from 2060 to 3060, and less than 10% increase from 3060 to 4060. Conclusion, if you have a 1060, it's absolutely worth to upgrade to a 2060, and if you have a 3060, it would be a waste of money upgrading to a 4060.
no just a wait rtx 5000
what kind of monitoring program is this
RTX 3060 is the new undisputed underdog champion after the legend GTX 1060!
Nvidia should have never made this bad boy. I have one and I feel it will last till 2025! RIP RTX 4 series.
also keep in mind,these numbers are @ Max settings,with DLSS turned off. so you can expect a 25-40% performance increase depending on the graphics settings,and/or DLSS turned on
true，all high settings in Starfield with frame generation turned off, I only got 40 fps. When it was turned on it boosted to 80
@@OwO-z2w yup! you sacrifice a 15-25% resolution/physical quality degradation,in exchange for 25-40% more performance
I got a gaming laptop with 4060 for 700 on Cyber Monday. I play on medium settings at 1080p, capped fps at 60 with only dlss and Frame Gen enabled. The interesting I learned is that ultra and medium looks the same if you compare the video side by side. 😅
Hey did you use DLSS?
That difference between 3060 and 4060 is ridicoulos. Huang is genius.
The fact that the .1% lows were better for the 3060 than the 4060 in quite a few places is just sad. More frames for the 4060? Barely, but that .1% tells you it's a smoother experience on the 3060. Nvidia is quickly turning into the Apple of the x86 world. The 60 series will be codenamed Macintosh.........
4060 had better lows in everygame tested
I ll get the 3060,doesnt worth 4060 the extra money.Tyvm for the comparison!
I have a 1440p monitor i have a 3060 gaming laptop is it whort to get 7700xt ore should i wait for new upcoming gpu
if not seeing the fps and the score figures, I really can't tell any differences on the visual level among all those cards
ey, 1 question man.
If you choose en RDR2, refresh rate 60hz, how damn you got more fps in the test? cause when i configured that , i had always 60fps maximum, so, where i wrong?
PD: test in 1080p, not fair for 3060 and 4060, better in 2K at least.
4060 is more like 3060TI with lower consumption. 4060 should be more power. 4060 outperform 3060 around 10-15%, while 2060 is nearly 100% stronger than 1060.