How would have been WW2 if Germany had won WW1?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ก.ย. 2024
  • If Germany had won the First World War, how would have been the Second World War? Let's suppose that Central Powers win 1st World war in 1916. Italy join Central powers, France is defeated, USA have no time to deploy all its power and Great Britain ask for armistice in 1917. The war is over, Central Powers won. But there will be the same a Second World War, in 1937. What will happen?
    AXIS:
    Germany
    Italy
    Poland
    Hungary
    Netherlands
    Finland
    Romania
    Bulgaria
    Baltic States
    Ukraine
    Slovakia
    China
    ALLIED:
    U.S.A.
    Great Britain
    France
    Russia
    Japan
    Belgium
    Yugoslavia
    Greece
    Australia
    Canada
    New Zealand
    India
    Musics: Achilles - Strings di Kevin MacLeod è un brano autorizzato da Creative Commons Attribution (creativecommon...)
    Fonte: incompetech.com...
    Artista: incompetech.com/ All This - Scoring Action di Kevin MacLeod è un brano autorizzato da Creative Commons Attribution (creativecommon...)
    Fonte: incompetech.com...
    Artista: incompetech.com/ Come Play with Me di Kevin MacLeod è un brano autorizzato da Creative Commons Attribution (creativecommon...)
    Fonte: incompetech.com...
    Artista: incompetech.com/ Constancy Part 1 - The Descent di Kevin MacLeod è un brano autorizzato da Creative Commons Attribution (creativecommon...)
    Fonte: incompetech.com...
    Artista: incompetech.com/ Constancy Part 2 - The Descent di Kevin MacLeod è un brano autorizzato da Creative Commons Attribution (creativecommon...)
    Fonte: incompetech.com...
    Artista: incompetech.com/ Crisis - Scoring Action di Kevin MacLeod è un brano autorizzato da Creative Commons Attribution (creativecommon...)
    Fonte: incompetech.com...
    Artista: incompetech.com/ Darkness is Coming di Kevin MacLeod è un brano autorizzato da Creative Commons Attribution (creativecommon...)
    Fonte: incompetech.com...
    Artista: incompetech.com/ Devastation and Revenge di Kevin MacLeod è un brano autorizzato da Creative Commons Attribution (creativecommon...)
    Fonte: incompetech.com...
    Artista: incompetech.com/ Interloper di Kevin MacLeod è un brano autorizzato da Creative Commons Attribution (creativecommon...)
    Fonte: incompetech.com...
    Artista: incompetech.com/

ความคิดเห็น • 1.6K

  • @teukuadissa3679
    @teukuadissa3679 4 ปีที่แล้ว +591

    Japan: *Bomb Lae Harbour*
    USA: "Germany that is aggresive"

    • @blitzkrupp8583
      @blitzkrupp8583 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      XD

    • @blitzkrupp8583
      @blitzkrupp8583 4 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      I thought I am the only one that recognize that XD

    • @blitzkrupp8583
      @blitzkrupp8583 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@marcosberenstein4558 it's just a alternate man

    • @number1kenyan
      @number1kenyan 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      why are all the replies from the 'Blitz Krupp' guy.

    • @blitzkrupp8583
      @blitzkrupp8583 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@number1kenyan idk who is Blitzkrupp

  • @MrZizeb
    @MrZizeb 7 ปีที่แล้ว +292

    also i dont believe russia would have any chance in invasion. german forces were far superior. especialy when they wouldnt be hindered by other fronts and winter

    • @cabbageman5329
      @cabbageman5329 4 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      and no stalin or stalin like five year plan no big industry no way they can stand against the whole of europe

    • @richardcordella4147
      @richardcordella4147 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Maybe. But remember, Russia is never as strong as she looks, but Russia is never as weak as she looks.

    • @whitezombie10
      @whitezombie10 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yes but the US army helped them

    • @bootlegorinoki2162
      @bootlegorinoki2162 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@richardcordella4147 ??countries have gender?

    • @richardcordella4147
      @richardcordella4147 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@bootlegorinoki2162 LOL. No, just quoting the saying. It's a real Russian saying, by the way. And nations are typically referred to in the female gender.

  • @epochal1
    @epochal1 7 ปีที่แล้ว +550

    If Russia was fighting alone in Europe, they would get their shit kicked in so far that it came out the other side

    • @epochal1
      @epochal1 7 ปีที่แล้ว +63

      Also I highly doubt Germany would defeat France that quickly, we're talking the German Empire here, they don't have Blitzkrieg.

    • @epochal1
      @epochal1 7 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      And there is no way in hell that anyone or anything can invade the United Kingdom with destroyed the RAF

    • @zvallid
      @zvallid  7 ปีที่แล้ว +63

      Why' in this situation Germany is a world power with a decent navy

    • @keineahnungundso...3589
      @keineahnungundso...3589 7 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      +zvallid The only way to explain this AH scenario is to say that Kaiser Willhelm II. almost completely stopped paying the army and only supported the navy. While also disolving most of it and limiting it to 600k. His stupidness would have lost to a weakened (not owning Ukraine) and unindustrialized (no 5 year plans) russia cuz he was outnumbered 8 to 1 (4 milion VS. 500k).

    • @zarlei6048
      @zarlei6048 7 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Keine Ahnung und so... Germany mobilizes. They would have 8 million on the front lines in 3 months. No way Russia could beat Germany. Keep in mind 1/3 of Russian manpower was lost in Brest-Litowsk treaty.

  • @richard_nj
    @richard_nj 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1029

    If Stalin hadn't industrialised russia, they would still have been an farmers country in 1940. They wouldn't have had a chance against a German army that would have been even bigger and better equipped than in our timeline.... and the last map makes no sense, you said that communism never spreads in russia yet the area of russian influence is called 'soviets'.

    • @charlesnapoleon9070
      @charlesnapoleon9070 7 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      They would have industrialized Bit mich later

    • @richard_nj
      @richard_nj 7 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Bit mich?

    • @zvallid
      @zvallid  7 ปีที่แล้ว +170

      "Soviet" at the end is an error. Being without Communism, Russia would have been stronger and more industrialized. When does happened in history that Communism brought more industries to a country?

    • @charlesnapoleon9070
      @charlesnapoleon9070 7 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Shitty autocorrecture! much, not mich.

    • @charlesnapoleon9070
      @charlesnapoleon9070 7 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      Without communism, there are not much influenting powers in Russia. Except the White army, but it would take some time for them to get strong enough too change much.

  • @timonsolus
    @timonsolus 7 ปีที่แล้ว +224

    If Germany wins WW1, I think Belarus and Ukraine would be independent from Russia, just as they were after the collapse of the USSR. This would make Russia a lot weaker.

    • @strategylover1234
      @strategylover1234 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      well ukraine and Belarus were shown independent only but as Russia has lots of resources so they are powerful

    • @Chosen_Ash
      @Chosen_Ash 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      They were as German puppets that’s would be what happened

    • @Spiks05
      @Spiks05 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This has aged kinda well

    • @timonsolus
      @timonsolus 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Spiks05 : Russia IS a lot weaker without Belarus and Ukraine. That’s why Putin is so desperate to get them back. He’s got Belarus back as a satellite state, and he’s trying to get Ukraine back by force.

    • @Spiks05
      @Spiks05 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@timonsolus That's true

  • @teambaby821
    @teambaby821 7 ปีที่แล้ว +334

    The best part was the music

    • @zvallid
      @zvallid  7 ปีที่แล้ว +94

      only because there are not naked women

    • @lsquad
      @lsquad 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      +zvallid Albania would go with Axis and Turkey with NATO in the end maybe?

    • @DRGOAT-sn1mh
      @DRGOAT-sn1mh 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@zvallid what was the music in the beginning I can't find it in the description

    • @zvallid
      @zvallid  4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@DRGOAT-sn1mh if not in the description I don't remember. I've already cancelled all files of this project

    • @britishempire7609
      @britishempire7609 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@zvallid how about the one on 1:11

  • @michahunicz1741
    @michahunicz1741 7 ปีที่แล้ว +610

    Now, "What if the USA joined Central Powers in 1916"?

    • @zvallid
      @zvallid  7 ปีที่แล้ว +90

      Yes, it will be the next video

    • @michahunicz1741
      @michahunicz1741 7 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      zvallid​ Can I write for you scenario of WW3 based on this video - FINAL ROUND :D ?

    • @zvallid
      @zvallid  7 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      Sure!

    • @michahunicz1741
      @michahunicz1741 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      zvallid​​ Thanks! When can we expect video about the USA joining Central Powers? Have you written this scenario?

    • @gozdebayraktar1103
      @gozdebayraktar1103 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      zvallid Can ya fix this video and I'll give it a like. After finishing that video.

  • @DevletGiray
    @DevletGiray 7 ปีที่แล้ว +237

    Why did Russia become Soviets at the end??

    • @zvallid
      @zvallid  7 ปีที่แล้ว +93

      It's an error

    • @user-kt8yp5ho2y
      @user-kt8yp5ho2y 7 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      zvallid This video is suck. I wish you remake this video.

    • @erikbortuzzo8968
      @erikbortuzzo8968 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Correggilo;)

    • @andreamarino6010
      @andreamarino6010 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Erik Bortuzzo Guarda un po' chi si rivede... l'indipendentista senza sostegno

    • @erikbortuzzo8968
      @erikbortuzzo8968 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ha parlato il fascista mafioso senza sostegno! Forno crematorio di trieste purificali tutti da milano a ovest e da bologna in giù!

  • @Chrischi3TutorialLPs
    @Chrischi3TutorialLPs 7 ปีที่แล้ว +236

    theres so many things wrong with this scenario.

    • @mohammadnooriman4185
      @mohammadnooriman4185 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @AdamI Playz i will happy to see

    • @regular_being
      @regular_being 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @AdamI Playz Also,things like the panzerkampfwagen wouldnt exist.other names,other technoligy.

    • @generalsherman519
      @generalsherman519 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Its a joke

    • @thepeople1724
      @thepeople1724 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I was thinking that probably France and Britain will fall into Communist or Fascist regime..
      And the WW 2 would be Germany vs Fascist Britain and France.. And The Russians... yea in the first year of war, they'll invade Germany,s Eastern Puppet State..

    • @thepeople1724
      @thepeople1724 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      AdamI Playz I agreed
      This video is good, but Russian invasion of Germany will be a failure..
      Also maybe the Germans will build their nuclear bombs first and drop it in Russia or France

  • @darrelarno9151
    @darrelarno9151 2 ปีที่แล้ว +118

    I think you should redo this video, because:
    1. with Germany winning ww1, German national spirit in America is higher than ever
    2. without industrialization from Stalin, Russia would still be agricultural in 1940
    3. Japan attacking port Lae without a base in Philliphines seems unlikely
    4. Japan attacks port Lae and America thinks Germany is the aggressor? what?
    5. too much focus on Hitler, if you want to focus on him, make him take an important role, like minister of economy or maybe head of the wunderwaffe project

    • @mmmoinmoin
      @mmmoinmoin 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      yes you are right! it is important

    • @hooligan410
      @hooligan410 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If he ever plans a remake on this, maybe he'll look at this

    • @Dock284
      @Dock284 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      how does he focus too much on Hitler. He mentions that he does not gain power and that he dies in Berlin. Like how is this focusing too much on him?!?!?!?

    • @Ruvikom
      @Ruvikom 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      even what you just corrected makes no sense.
      The Americans even in our timeline did not want war, and in this timeline they are not attacked by the Japanese either.
      Ergo, there is no real national sentiment to go to war.
      Then why focus on Hitler ?!
      Germany is a victorious state since the First World War, with a strong economy.
      Hitler came to power thanks to the frustration of the Germans due to Versailles.
      But in this timeline, Germany won.
      So your points are pointless.
      And above all, this is an entertainment video, please, just be a history teacher.

    • @shinigummyl1586
      @shinigummyl1586 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Ruvikom They focused on hitler because it shows how different the timeline is.
      The fact that the most influential and evil people in history is now just a revolutionist and a failure it shows again how different this world is.

  • @LifeworksEntertainment
    @LifeworksEntertainment 7 ปีที่แล้ว +337

    Umm..I don't think there would be a world war 2 if Germany won world war 1. They started world war 2 because they lost world war 1.

    • @DevletGiray
      @DevletGiray 7 ปีที่แล้ว +66

      Don't be absurd. He explains in the video why there's a war again. A huge reason is France and Russia join out of hatred for Germany, just like how Germany started the real WWII out of hatred for Slavs and Jews (backed by Allies).

    • @legowarproductions6823
      @legowarproductions6823 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ClownBastards don't forget Japan, pearl harbor

    • @LifeworksEntertainment
      @LifeworksEntertainment 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ''Why there's a war again''??
      Also why they hated Jews and probably Slavs too, is because they lost the war and that made them blame on Jews and Slavs. I'm not saying that this youtuber is wrong, I'm just assuming.

    • @LifeworksEntertainment
      @LifeworksEntertainment 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I was talking about Germany, Japan and USA is another thing.

    • @Seagull780
      @Seagull780 7 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Except Britain started WW2

  • @TheVoyager3301
    @TheVoyager3301 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    Wait, Belgium wasn't a german protectorate?
    They didn't need to attack Belgium!

    • @caniget1ksubscribers576
      @caniget1ksubscribers576 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Maybe Belgium for nazi germany, belgium was nothing to them Maybe?

    • @karlkoller5308
      @karlkoller5308 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@caniget1ksubscribers576 they attack belgium lol

    • @Spanish_Conquistador
      @Spanish_Conquistador 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It was a protectorate not part of Germany and it wasn't mentioned they invaded it was mentioned they sent troops through Belgium

    • @Spanish_Conquistador
      @Spanish_Conquistador 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nvm it said invaded

    • @CzechPigeon
      @CzechPigeon 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Spanish_Conquistador in 1 video idk wich video it was mentioned that belgium became a republic because britian refused to let belgium be a protectorate and have a coast where german navy could easily land on british soil

  • @SureshBalajiDN
    @SureshBalajiDN 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    7:34 look how the tables have turned

  • @julten6969
    @julten6969 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Germany: annexes a part of Belgium so they don’t have to invade Belgium to invade France
    Also Germany: how about I do it anyway

  • @russg1801
    @russg1801 6 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    A plausible scenario; that regardless of who 'won' WW1, the other side would be itching for a rematch, revenge, and recoupment of what they'd lost. And though WW1 ostensibly ended with an 'armistice,' Germany was still treated as a defeated party in the Treaty of Versailles.

  • @HerrHusic
    @HerrHusic 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Russia and Japan:attack Germany
    USA:Germany is agressor

    • @allantamm4943
      @allantamm4943 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes that point didnt make any sense. Us would had sticked for lendlease only most likely because there was no reason to go to war

  • @joshkim5432
    @joshkim5432 7 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I absolutely love your videos, they were like life to me. Although there is some stuff I don't agree with, keep up the good work

  • @user-kt8yp5ho2y
    @user-kt8yp5ho2y 7 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    This is not what I wanted. I wish you remake this video.

    • @gozdebayraktar1103
      @gozdebayraktar1103 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Altis but it's true

    • @j.franklin21
      @j.franklin21 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It's his video. His ideas. Not your vision.

    • @chip1646
      @chip1646 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@j.franklin21 Its an alternative history, not a hey lets make random shit up which wouldnt work

    • @aetu35
      @aetu35 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      ok wehraboo

  • @indahf.freztiyana824
    @indahf.freztiyana824 5 ปีที่แล้ว +72

    Whoa, whoa, whoa... Wait a second...!
    In 01:16, you said communism doesn't prevail, and the White Army wins...
    How did Russia ended up as Soviet in 12:58, if communism never succeed in Russia...?
    Just wanted to clarify this outstanding simulation...
    P E A C E O U T . . . !

    • @wife_puncher_bot8483
      @wife_puncher_bot8483 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It was a error

    • @aetu35
      @aetu35 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Its an error

    • @yeetman2814
      @yeetman2814 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Zvallid made an error

    • @bokixtreme1107
      @bokixtreme1107 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Nasser Abdalla Zhukov was too good to be killed, one of the best generals

  • @krimtressy4510
    @krimtressy4510 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The main reason Germany went to war in WW2 was because of the treaty of Versailles that followed after their defeat in WW1. If they had won WW1 there would not have been a national hatred for how the allied forces had treated them after WW1 and Hitler, although would have likely still been able to raise sympathy for his cause, it would not be on the same scale to our normal timeline. Basically speaking, if Germany won WW1 it is unlikely that there would have been a WW2.

  • @yoyo123yt
    @yoyo123yt 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    13:00 I thought that the Soviets never won in russia

  • @luknotshiphile
    @luknotshiphile 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I have an idea: What if Austria-Hungary Joined the allies in WW1. (I know it sounds crazy but keep reading.)
    Before WW1, Germany noticed how weak and unstable A-H was. They also knew that A-H's neighbors wanted land. So Germany secretly betrayed A-H and made alliances with Italy, Serbia, Montenegro, and Romania. These countries prepared for war with A-H who had realized what was happening at this point. A-H made alliances with France and Russia. They offered Galicia. In 1914, Franz Ferdinand was shot and killed. France and Russia gave "unconditional support to Austria-Hungary." A month later. Austria attacked Serbia. Germany and her allies came to Germany's aid, forcing France and Russia to join the war. I'll let you craft the rest of the scenario.

  • @yereverluvinuncleber
    @yereverluvinuncleber 7 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    This is basically the scenario as our WWII, almost identical - this is NOT how it would have panned out. The austro Hungarian Empire might have collapsed, with a revolution in Turkey, however the Russian revolution is also inevitable given Russia's collapse. France would have revitalised and rearmed just as post 1870 when they bounced back to life, or alternatively a collapse of National will and subordination to Germany. Britain would probably ally with the US or possibly a rapproachment with Germany, with Britain controlling the seas with Germany's aspirations achieved by Continental conquest.

  • @Starfleet2269
    @Starfleet2269 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Therapist: Nazi France doesn't exist and can't hurt you
    Nazi France:

  • @wrrrrrrr219
    @wrrrrrrr219 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    7:02 complete with nightmares

    • @jakeflfirelegend5377
      @jakeflfirelegend5377 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      EAS New York what do you mean that’s a dream come true

  • @edouardl2
    @edouardl2 6 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    The German army was at 12 million during WW2 vs 6.8 m for Russia with 3 M on the German front. Given the fact that in this scenario there is only one front, it is very unlikely Germany would have lost. Furthermore in 1942, Axis was close economically to Allied forces. USA won because it had a fantastic growth during WW2 as gnp nearly doubled in four years. Also, if Germany had won WW1, they would have had an increase in GDP because they would not have had to pay damages to the allies and would have gained more colonies. As such, it is very likely initially they would have been at least at par with USA including their allies. Contrary to what is said above, Russian and German population were close excluding allies(Russia 103, Germany 79). As such, Russian real advantage was the massive size of the country and winter. Another fact relates to the jews scientist which would have stayed in Germany rather than go to the US. At the time, the germans had far better engineers than the USA. One of the key parameter in the defeat of the Axe was lack of petrol and destruction of industry from England but this is not a problem in this scenario.
    USA needed 2 to 3 years to really have an impact and Russia would not have been able to sustain a war so long with most of central Europe on his back. What killed Germany was too many fronts but this scenario would avoid it by eliminating uk. Then how could Germany lose with all the negative removed and all the positive staying ?

  • @mauriceo730
    @mauriceo730 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Part 1, well done sir. Part 2 meh feels like a rush job.

  • @adamlucas5977
    @adamlucas5977 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Britain: Surrenders
    Russia and USA: Fine, I'll do it myself then

  • @deniscostiniuc5144
    @deniscostiniuc5144 7 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    But not what I hoped for !

  • @Scurvybubble242
    @Scurvybubble242 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    hitler was 53 on the 19th of april, plus he probably wouldve been at least a brigadier general after the war considering he was iron cross first class, he couldve been high command material since the whole caucasus and kursk plans were quite intelligent of him, kursk wasnt even his fault

  • @dams6829
    @dams6829 7 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Finally you make this.

    • @user-kt8yp5ho2y
      @user-kt8yp5ho2y 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Ādams Vizulis But it's suck.

    • @dams6829
      @dams6829 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      이동연 I dont think so.

    • @biasedhistory618
      @biasedhistory618 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ādams Vizulis It sucks really hard.

    • @user-kt8yp5ho2y
      @user-kt8yp5ho2y 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Miksu 3000 Yeah.

    • @dams6829
      @dams6829 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Well everyone have their opinions.

  • @SilverCinder1
    @SilverCinder1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This just got put in my recommended videos but I really don't think USA would look at all that happened, and call Germany the aggressors. The only country Germany attacked unprovoked was Belgium. Meanwhile Japan joined the war just to be build an empire and surprise attacked a lot of nations.

    • @zvallid
      @zvallid  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      USA call aggressor everybody is against their interests

    • @JamesZheyuXu
      @JamesZheyuXu ปีที่แล้ว

      @@zvallidt the American public is against the war,the US ,being democratic will need good reason.Also,I don’t think the US will attack China,because the American public is heavily against Japan,due the atrocities committed by them.And if they did,the amount of soldiers that will be needed to keep the ROC inline will be huge,since the Nationalists and the Communists are all ferocious fighters that will rather die than surrender.The US general staff already didn’t want to invade Japan even if it would end the war,now imagine that but in a country that holds a fifth of the world population and is just as large as the United States.Also,a lot of the reason the Japan is not able to attack Russia in OTL is because of the amount of troops tied down in China. Now with Americans doing their dirty work,they would immediately attack allied holdings in Asia. So,helping Japan will be,in a word,strategic suicide.

  • @zeljkocrljenica7135
    @zeljkocrljenica7135 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    11:40 Paulus vs Zhukov?? I expected the Germans are doomed at this point...

  • @monsvague4825
    @monsvague4825 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Why would Germany declare unrestricted submarine warfare after winning against Great Britain? Who would they fight with their submarines? This doesn't make sense.

  • @RollinRetro99
    @RollinRetro99 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Fully believable until the US declared war on Germany because they were seen as an "agressor". The US was highly isolationist in our timeline, getting involved in a second European war after the crushing defeat of WWI would be so far down on the "to-do" list for the US that Germany would have to directly attack them in order for a declaration of war to even be considered. On top of that, there is more German ancestry in the US than any other. The US would have probably backed Germany, if anybody.

    • @mhyc22
      @mhyc22 ปีที่แล้ว

      "crushing defeat" more like a very tiny war that paused for 20 years

  • @dasboot4482
    @dasboot4482 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Japan:Atacks a german colony
    USA:Germnay is the agressor

  • @Wi-Fi-El
    @Wi-Fi-El 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    If you need help with your videos, I'm a pretty good voice actor and photo/video editor. I'd be glad to help in any way bc I love your videos

    • @zvallid
      @zvallid  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I would really need a voice

  • @lordhex_3033
    @lordhex_3033 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What situation it is...
    France: Welp, I surrender

    • @lordhex_3033
      @lordhex_3033 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Jk don't take srsly

  • @LEA_TV
    @LEA_TV 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    What's the music when Germany and Poland invade Galicia?

  • @SANP76234
    @SANP76234 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    U should do how cold war would look if germany won ww1 and ww3 of this scenario with Russia usa and germany fighting against each other it would surely be a good scenario!

    • @zvallid
      @zvallid  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      good idea

  • @jasonromd.lacidajr1348
    @jasonromd.lacidajr1348 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I think that you forgot about the Luftwaffe and how efficient the Germans are in urban combat. I also believe that the Germans will produce a huge fleet in the Pacific since it is most likely to be invaded by the closer countries like Japan and USA. I also think that the Germans won’t back out as fast as what you have shown over here “ 11:16 “, specially since Germany had a head start of being a world power.

    • @jasonromd.lacidajr1348
      @jasonromd.lacidajr1348 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Specially since Germany can mass produce their advanced equipment.

  • @gillesaboubechara2978
    @gillesaboubechara2978 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hi can you clarify something:
    Even if USA impose an oil embargo on Germany there is no need for "unrestricted submarine warfare" because Britain will already be defeated, Germany can control all the ships going to Russia by the Baltic sea, USA cannot supply weapons to Russia to Murmansk indefinitely and to far from Vladivostok and USA the isolation lobby would be very powerful like in our timeline so no unrestricted submarine warfare, no USA entering the war.
    Germany would have more difficulties to defeat a non-communist Russia even with Poland and Ukraine in the Axis and less than a 500Km from Moscow but the Russian defeat is nearly inevitable so Germany would still win in your scenario.

  • @alithesword2183
    @alithesword2183 7 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Germany should have won the war at russia because russia was defeated very hardly and because of this russia cannot maintain the biggest army of world but germany can by giving equipment to peoples coming frım poland baltic france britain and from colonies.Germany could have made russia need them by getting important western territories

  • @joeysavings4756
    @joeysavings4756 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Germany would have won and became the first world power the USA would've stayed neutral and Russia would still be a farmers country

  • @matthewkohari961
    @matthewkohari961 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Lol nice vid.
    Just one thing:
    Britain: ally with the same monarchism or a nazis?
    * Britain choose to side with the nazis lol*

  • @elfrad1714
    @elfrad1714 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just to clarify. If Germany wins WW1 there will no Axis. Germany remains an imperial power with a Kaiser, aka Wilhelm, the goofball. In that scenario Hitler would have remained an unknown painter. It is rather odd therefore that in the real Axis power Japan is part of the Allies. I find this scenario wholly unrealistic. The comments below indicate I am not alone.

  • @marcovaccari7276
    @marcovaccari7276 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Hi Zvallid, would you like to explain would have been WWII if hitler gain power succesfully in 1923?

  • @narayasuiryoku1397
    @narayasuiryoku1397 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    2:17 is it me or this guy look like he is gonna say Ight Imma head out ?

  • @mikesglider
    @mikesglider 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Good job doing the game of "what if". I hate any wars not defensive but my constructive criticism is why did you need to put Eisenhower and Churchill back in power? Those two buffoon's were a disaster on legs. I thought it funny that you have Japan doing another Pearl Harbor-esque attack...but this time on Germany !-) What if? It would've been nice to get another do-over no? The world needs to rid ourselves of those who pushed war on us all! Please research the "real causes of World Wars 1 and 2"...Hint: they're not what we're told...to be continued:

  • @antoniomariamacri7500
    @antoniomariamacri7500 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The reason why France surrended immediately in 1940 was because they were traumatized by the losses of the Great War, with WW1 ending two years earlier for France (in the video on that the armistice is signed for France in August 1916) and with that being a defeat, despite most of the war was fought on german soil, would make France nationalist wich are in power in this scenario feel like they could have do more, as the Germans felt in our time-line, so France would have never lost her obsession with offensive tactics.
    This mean France would have been able to fight much better in WW2, as WW2 was in a period when technology favored offenders, of course, France has no resource and population to defeat Germany, unless Both Russia and U. S.A. allie with her, but France would have fight much longer and much better.

  • @deathcallscall3438
    @deathcallscall3438 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    not your best work zvallid. not only because of the theory crafting, but video editing and musicalization fell short this time.
    and you really ought to get someone to help you with the subtitles.
    good effort though.

  • @wilhelmsmith6138
    @wilhelmsmith6138 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    China wouldn't surrender so easily, they would have done something like they did in WWII, as well with China reunified their army would have been big/have a good amount of reserves. I doubt the Chinese army would surrender so easily. And they'd probably got german supoort before the war, making their army not as weak as they were in WW2.

  • @Apollo-py6bs
    @Apollo-py6bs 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    1:01 please can anyone tell me this name of this music ?? Please

  • @isq2242
    @isq2242 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hitler was a Volkssturm I thought he was in the Bavarian regiment as a assault rifleman
    Hitler's carry these during the Battle of Berlin
    Primary weapon:STG 37
    Secondary : Luger
    AT:Panzerfaust 37
    Helmet:Stalhelm 37 (the new version not the WW1 version)
    His kill counts during the battle is
    548 infantry kills
    54 officer kills
    68 tanks kills most were Russian BT 7 and T 34
    But seriously he died but he died with honour by defending Berlin
    I salute you

  • @pedrojuan8050
    @pedrojuan8050 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I don't know how, with significant boost compared to the real timeline, and with almost the entire Europe on their side, plus with Britain essentially out of the war, Germany still managed to lose the war. I know it's an alternate timeline, but still.

    • @TimeMakerDotPH
      @TimeMakerDotPH ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Because the "boost" comes with responsibility.
      Of course the German puppet states in Eastern Europe (Finland, Baltics, Poland, and Ukraine) look cool but you need to keep them pro-German, put troops there to suppress anti-German sentiments.
      There's also a possibility that these vassals would end up like Afghanistan and South Vietnam, economies made of American money (in this case, German investments). The money that Germany paid in the Treaty of Versailles, would go to funding these quasi-colonies in this alternate timeline.
      In the real world, WWI ended with an Allied/Entente victory but the new countries didn't end up as pro-Allied puppet states, they are literally sovereign independent nations thus they incentivise themselves to develop their own economies (Western capital would be just secondary drivers).

    • @TimeMakerDotPH
      @TimeMakerDotPH ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Also, both in the real and alternate timeline, Germany is surrounded by allies that have a bad history of industrialisation.
      Only gamechanger here is that there would be uninterrupted militarism and military industry in the 1920s (interrupted by Weimar democracy, only to be restarted by the Austrian Man in the 1930s though they had been already secretly rearming in the 1920s though in a small-scale) which would make Germany stronger.

  • @jungleboi6544
    @jungleboi6544 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This channel is like starwars episode

  • @fireemblemistrash75
    @fireemblemistrash75 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is fucking awesome! Excuse my french but this video is amazing, I may just watch it over and over again.

  • @leanderschatz3704
    @leanderschatz3704 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good work! Probably its not what would have happend, but it's an interesting theory!

  • @mitchells3345
    @mitchells3345 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    It’s literally ww2 but different slightly

  • @christophershen6692
    @christophershen6692 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    like...
    *WW1
    Switzerland: *eats popcorn*
    *WW2
    Switzerland: *eats popcorn*
    *alternative history of WW1
    Switzerland: *eats popcorn*
    *Alternative history of WW2
    Switzerland: *eats popcorn*
    damn Switzerland loves popcorns

  • @elrincondemarshal9796
    @elrincondemarshal9796 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    4:59 Maurras: chale, ya la cagué verdad

  • @whereisthelambsauce3908
    @whereisthelambsauce3908 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The french didn’t had that much supply to build the maginot line I think they would have tried something else. And the russians wouldn’t have survived that long.

  • @michaelkovacic2608
    @michaelkovacic2608 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    hey zvallid thank you so much i waited for this Video for so Long! Great work! does Germany remain a superpower at the end? they lost influence but they would likely be the first to develop nuclear weapons ...

    • @zvallid
      @zvallid  7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, Germany would remain a superpower. They would lose Pacific but gain the control of almost all Africa

    • @michaelkovacic2608
      @michaelkovacic2608 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      thanks for the answer. can you make a video about how the japanese could have won the second sino-japanese war?

    • @zvallid
      @zvallid  7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, it's an idea. may be in the future

    • @Lord_Sarlix07
      @Lord_Sarlix07 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@zvallid And what is with Russia? Would Russia become a world power or is the USA the only one ?

    • @zvallid
      @zvallid  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Lord_Sarlix07 I think Russia would be one of the superpowers

  • @zulvan3880
    @zulvan3880 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    continue this project bro

  • @Dariusz_1.618
    @Dariusz_1.618 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    8:25 Top Anime Betrayals

  • @cantspeakcantspeak79
    @cantspeakcantspeak79 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    the old Kaiser always had a bad opinion about facism, he would never ally Mussolini's Italy
    the Habsburgs will somehow keep their crown in their former crown lands, they would not be willing to join the German empire unless they really need it
    I feel like it just ignores all the small events happening that could be really impactful, its basically just our WW2 but featuring the German Empire.
    USA never likes those imperialists unless there is a common enemy(in this case is France and Russia, but I don't know why you did not mentioned it)
    I hope next time will have more accuracy

    • @eric11
      @eric11 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Italy was still a monarchy

  • @TheWrongBalance
    @TheWrongBalance 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    As always
    Romania switches sides again

  • @fetts4ck849
    @fetts4ck849 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The imperial german army wasnt called wehrmacht, it was called Reichswehr. The Kaiser didnt just change the whole army conncept bruh

  • @gerakhan1162
    @gerakhan1162 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Finalmente è uscita!

  • @Gangst3r4ever
    @Gangst3r4ever 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    0:00-1:01 Muted video, Slowed down to 0,75, played Star Wars intro music= GOLD

  • @themajor2190
    @themajor2190 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    "Von Paulus will be the commander of the army"
    NOOO NOT THAT GUY!

    • @erwinrommel6561
      @erwinrommel6561 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@herbertsdottir9223 the generals are good lmao!What a idiot.Most of them were good and Hitler didn't made mistake kid it was his generals who made mistakes you would know if you weren't illiterate. Not a Nazi sympathizer but that's just the truth

    • @herbertsdottir9223
      @herbertsdottir9223 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@erwinrommel6561 he someone is triggered

  • @LordOfNothingham
    @LordOfNothingham 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You should make a video on how Germany’s World War 2 narrative would be changed if Hitler was accepted into the Academy of Fine Arts Vienna.

  • @TheAmir259
    @TheAmir259 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Wait what? Galicia? Poland protest for what reason? I don't get how you start the war.
    And i'd say it's impossible for allies to push an already powerful Axis in this one. You have the majority of Europe on Axis side, you also have Africa, China should not be easily crushed unless you say that Chiang Kai Shek does the same corrupt thing again.

    • @zvallid
      @zvallid  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      The problem to make a hipothetical video starting from a not real situation is that is difficult to understand.Half Galicia is ethnic Polish, China would be weak as in 1939, Axis only problem was USA and nothing else, and in this situation USA is powerfull

    • @TheAmir259
      @TheAmir259 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think the problem is not in making a hypothetical video, but rather it's how you make videos, which is kinda straight to the point and thus making some harder to understand. I've seen other people doing stuff like this but they explain deeply instead of straight to the point.
      Anyway, can you explain thoroughly of the history of (this) Galicia?

  • @slibertas1996
    @slibertas1996 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Also, Russia in this timeline never fell to the communists

  • @damo-sonutar
    @damo-sonutar 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    What's the music? If anything,sorry for my English

    • @zvallid
      @zvallid  7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'll insert the songs in the description in the next days

    • @damo-sonutar
      @damo-sonutar 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Spacibo,camrad

  • @user-cd4bx6uq1y
    @user-cd4bx6uq1y 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    4 years 667k 9.2k 1.6k
    This really feels like watching that one role-swap one-off episode of a cartoon show as a kid.

    • @user-cd4bx6uq1y
      @user-cd4bx6uq1y 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yup. That's why I stopped commenting before watching. Altgough this is minor. Anyway. A kinda more light hearted and humorous one off. Now that I'm halfway through. Lets see how jt changes.

  • @dams6829
    @dams6829 7 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Why make Germany axis? I think their aliance would have different name, plus why France got colonies and didnt Hitler die in ww1?

    • @dams6829
      @dams6829 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      zvallid Oh my bad, even I am sure germans would take their all colonies. I hope your next video will be contiuation of what if Soviets went to war with allies, cause I find it to be really interesting.

    • @zvallid
      @zvallid  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      In this situation Axis countries would have the control of the whole Africa

    • @charlesnapoleon9070
      @charlesnapoleon9070 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Adams, they wouldn't. Look for "German-Middle-Africa", then you know, what they want.

    • @ythan_ruelo
      @ythan_ruelo 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Actually it's not "axis" it should be "central powers"

    • @mackenziebeeney3764
      @mackenziebeeney3764 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Simplicity

  • @jonnyrawket8158
    @jonnyrawket8158 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The sudden flip in the front by Russia would’ve never happened. America would likely call early peace, transporting that many men and equipment through Siberia so quickly just isn’t feasible.

  • @bunnssgalore5407
    @bunnssgalore5407 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    heh even in the "Germany won ww1" Switzerland is still neutral

  • @berkoktayemre1940
    @berkoktayemre1940 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you are perfect man. why this cannel hasnt join

  • @na3x472
    @na3x472 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    How tf Russia became communist?

  • @RostyRos
    @RostyRos 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    WE WANT PART 3

  • @kevinjohnson7300
    @kevinjohnson7300 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    we would be super friends with russia if America went in to russia and did all of what they saidbin the vid

    • @gdynfetydsrgfdst2235
      @gdynfetydsrgfdst2235 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We can be friends without that,We should not care for what our politicians are doing:)

  • @kolakyr1671
    @kolakyr1671 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    11:06 Do you see there Konigsberg?
    No? CAUSE ITS KALININGRAD NOW!

  • @victorgz2907
    @victorgz2907 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    USA... an allied of Japan... huh

  • @daviddavis5689
    @daviddavis5689 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I really doubt UK would have given in .So much like WW II when US joined except Germany was already suffering from British naval blockade. By 1917 Germany as well as others were pretty much out of increasing force. Germany was close to suffering a revolution .

  • @hungarycountryball1056
    @hungarycountryball1056 7 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    patton hated the Russians tho.

    • @doughnutsandcoffee8622
      @doughnutsandcoffee8622 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Because they were communist, in this timeline they arnt.

    • @recthxrtxtxogaming8455
      @recthxrtxtxogaming8455 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Patton isn't the US. Also, he hated communism not specifically Russia

  • @user-ImperialPravda
    @user-ImperialPravda 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    There would be no WW2 because there wouldn’t be no treaty of ( the one at the end of WW1, I don’t know how to spell it ). So technically Hitler wouldn’t get mad at anything so he wouldn’t even rise to power or if he did maybe there would be but I don’t think so.

  • @rayvee2837
    @rayvee2837 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    10:00 song?

    • @zvallid
      @zvallid  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'll write the musics in the description of the video in the next days

    • @greywolf689
      @greywolf689 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@zvallid 2 years ago.

  • @lupettoversilia
    @lupettoversilia 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    È sempre una goduria vedere i video di 'sto canale !
    👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

  • @deniscostiniuc5144
    @deniscostiniuc5144 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Finaly !

    • @user-kt8yp5ho2y
      @user-kt8yp5ho2y 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Denis Costiniuc But it's suck.

  • @anarqubadov5722
    @anarqubadov5722 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Dude Franklin Dr Roosevelt promised his citizens that america vill dont join var

  • @malnutritionboy
    @malnutritionboy 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN WHAT THE FUCK it was going so well until... there has to be a save file. OH FUCK ME save file is ww1. kill me pls

  • @aetu35
    @aetu35 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is better than the newer video about the same topic you made

  • @allantamm4943
    @allantamm4943 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I agree with with many here. Even if america had sent weapons the supply road would be too long. Because like you said germany and italy would have strong navies, wich means north sea and mediteriean sea would be out of the question. So they would had lost the triple of manpower.

  • @ThePunchOfJustice
    @ThePunchOfJustice 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    awesome video, dude.

  • @obamagaming-zv4vy
    @obamagaming-zv4vy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    7:35
    At such a situation,it looks very dumb to invade an entire continent

  • @emperorofyorha2882
    @emperorofyorha2882 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    To tell the truth,this video is worth than other videos like If Germany win WW1.This video was greatly made.It had nice details.

  • @monkey_8227
    @monkey_8227 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I dont think Russia had a chance and i dont think America would declare war to germany, more to Japan.

  • @nikitakorolkov886
    @nikitakorolkov886 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    this made no sense, but very fun to watch lol