@@DiceData I’m not a numbers guy. That’s why I appreciate your content. Maybe by -best performing, -hi/lo risk.( the iron cross that you just did has the looked like it had the highest risk since every one went negative at one point, I guess) -Bankroll need Some ideas that could be interesting to compare.
When I play Iron Cross, I put twice as much on the box numbers as the field. That way you win a little more, but I also take the bets down after 3 hits to mitigate risk of the seven. That’s how I originally learned this strategy. I also like to play it with enough on the don’t to cover whatever I have on place bets.
Love your sims. I've been playing craps in casinos for several years. I've found that this 50-50 game has come out, well, almost exactly that. What i think you'll find is that after some honeymoon period where you're just happy to play for a few hours and not get thrashed, that you'll want a *result*. Meaning that you are no longer interested in just surviving. you'll be willing to risk a big loss for a potential big gain. Bet big or don't play. I always hear "don't give the law of averages time to catch up to you".
what was surprising about this? Sim says you're primarily losing using a losing strategy and it takes over 6 rolls to make money and playing with house money (statistically a 7 is supposed to be 1/6 rolls)
My "Prime Directive" in casino craps play - the rule that supersedes all other rules all the time - is "never visit the ATM". Bring a bankroll and stick to it. There's no crying in craps. If I lose, I lose. If I win, it's not because I'm smart or handsome. I've busted several times and several times won enough to pay for my next cruise.
Very nice graphics, smooth flowing presentation and succinct summary of your content. Just curious what the Iron Cross calc would be with the 2 and 12 paying double. Would it be much different than just the 12 paying triple? Would be interesting if you and John at Pro Craps (Casino Gaming TV) collaborated to review and assess his extensive research into strategies. John is an extraordinary/excellent resource in the field of gambling/craps analysis. A lot of craps players these days are seeking to ideally get out of the hand (recoup their investment on any given shooter) in as few rolls/hits as possible. So the big bankroll, small bankroll dichotomy should be addressed and squared away before applying the math. Thanks very much for your video. Looking forward to more of your work.
Thank you so much! I may try to knock that video out next week - it shouldn't take too long since I have done most of the heavy listing for this one. Thanks for the recommendation on John. He gave me such a cool shout-out today (I'm honored). I will definitely look into his research.
Math is flawed actually! You didn't start your dice rolls until the point was set. You can't not any rolls!!! The dice rolls count starts when the dice rolls no matter what it is even a 7. Can't ignore the rolls before the point is set. Those are winning numbers that you aren't counting right from the start.
Would be nice to end these simulation with some kind of leaderboard of all the strategies that have been simulated so far.
That's definitely the plan, I just haven't gotten there yet. What criteria would you suggest I use to rank them?
@@DiceData I’m not a numbers guy. That’s why I appreciate your content.
Maybe by
-best performing,
-hi/lo risk.( the iron cross that you just did has the looked like it had the highest risk since every one went negative at one point, I guess)
-Bankroll need
Some ideas that could be interesting to compare.
Makes sense
When I play Iron Cross, I put twice as much on the box numbers as the field. That way you win a little more, but I also take the bets down after 3 hits to mitigate risk of the seven. That’s how I originally learned this strategy. I also like to play it with enough on the don’t to cover whatever I have on place bets.
Yeah that makes a lot of sense. I'll have to do that one soon.
Love these simulations. Keep em coming!
Thank you I appreciate it. I've been working on the next video all day and I'm nowhere close! 🤯 Thanks for keeping me motivated.
Just subscribed! Thanks for the video! Godbless
@@waylonswaycraps cool, likewise thank you so much :)
very good. I like a regression, get out with house money, then collect and press til Big Red. Keep up the great vids.
@@paule.9638 thanks, will do!
Love your sims. I've been playing craps in casinos for several years. I've found that this 50-50 game has come out, well, almost exactly that. What i think you'll find is that after some honeymoon period where you're just happy to play for a few hours and not get thrashed, that you'll want a *result*. Meaning that you are no longer interested in just surviving. you'll be willing to risk a big loss for a potential big gain. Bet big or don't play. I always hear "don't give the law of averages time to catch up to you".
Oh man that does make sense. Right now I'm just happy to play. Let's see what happens as I get into the more advanced strategies!!
what was surprising about this? Sim says you're primarily losing using a losing strategy and it takes over 6 rolls to make money and playing with house money (statistically a 7 is supposed to be 1/6 rolls)
My "Prime Directive" in casino craps play - the rule that supersedes all other rules all the time - is "never visit the ATM". Bring a bankroll and stick to it. There's no crying in craps. If I lose, I lose. If I win, it's not because I'm smart or handsome. I've busted several times and several times won enough to pay for my next cruise.
@@mgn5678 yep that's the way to do it. It's a game after all, and we gotta be able to have fun playing it
If you are familiar with Waylon’s mind strategy, I would love to see that system rolled out. TYIA
I'll give it a look
Very nice graphics, smooth flowing presentation and succinct summary of your content. Just curious what the Iron Cross calc would be with the 2 and 12 paying double. Would it be much different than just the 12 paying triple? Would be interesting if you and John at Pro Craps (Casino Gaming TV) collaborated to review and assess his extensive research into strategies. John is an extraordinary/excellent resource in the field of gambling/craps analysis. A lot of craps players these days are seeking to ideally get out of the hand (recoup their investment on any given shooter) in as few rolls/hits as possible. So the big bankroll, small bankroll dichotomy should be addressed and squared away before applying the math. Thanks very much for your video. Looking forward to more of your work.
Thank you so much! I may try to knock that video out next week - it shouldn't take too long since I have done most of the heavy listing for this one.
Thanks for the recommendation on John. He gave me such a cool shout-out today (I'm honored). I will definitely look into his research.
I just uploaded this video for ya :)
Try the simulation laying the 5. Lay enough money to cover
the table on a 7.
Yes
So laying $105 on the 5 would pay $70@2:3 less a $4 vig. Is that what you're thinking?
Yes
Math is flawed actually! You didn't start your dice rolls until the point was set. You can't not any rolls!!! The dice rolls count starts when the dice rolls no matter what it is even a 7. Can't ignore the rolls before the point is set. Those are winning numbers that you aren't counting right from the start.
In this simulation/strategy, the player has no action until the point is set.