Watching Osipova I could feel her pain , her grief and during the basket scene, it was like someone trying to smile through the tears of a heartbreak. Both Zacharova and Nunez and superb , but for me it is Osipova with her incredibly powerful and moving character interpretation.
I love Zakharova in this kind of role that is so well suited to her elegance and slight reserve. And she is a wonderfully skilled dancer (plus Lantratov and Alexandrova!). But all three are outstanding, of course.
Zakharova is THE weakest ballerina IN this role. She doesn't use her legs for an expresssiveness. No complex elements of dance are used. It's a weak point of russian modern ballet dancers. Marianela Nunes is THE BEST ONE in this case.Osipova is very expressive either.
All are beautiful but Osipova literally EMBODIES the role. Every single movement is felt from the heart and runs through her body as she dances and it is captivating to me. I truly believe she IS the character she portrays.
If you MUST compare and declare who's the winner I disagree with you. She was too perky all of the time and not much waves of quiet anger and sorrow compare to the other 2. They are all fine just leave it at that. OK ?
@@mikiohirata9627 Ok, that's your opinion no worries. We are all allowed opinions and to express them. I just so happen to prefer Osipova's "perky" version, however I don't see how she was perky. She was acting the part, I saw sorrow, anguish and pain. Again, my opinion...no need to get so uppity about my comment.
All three brilliant dancers but Zakharova has something extra, the carriage of the head, the super graceful arms and her incredible line, steel wrapped in silk, superb !
All that is true but I didn't get the sense that her heart is breaking with despair, being forced to dance at the betrothal of Solor and Gamzatti. I did get that with Natalia. I just need to look at her face once, never mind her breathtaking expression and the pathos of her dancing, to feel all that grief. That's what I want from an artist, personally.
Totally agree. Interesting though to see Osipova in one role and then on stage with Nunez in the other role and you are right she would have made that her own also.
Very well said . All outstanding snd I think we all have our own preferences. Totally astounded myself in another video - La Fills ( never one of my favourite ballets anyway) but I chose someone else over Osipova! Big shock to my system 🤣🤣🤣 but one must be fair. They’re all beautiful in this as you say 🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺
Thank you. I watch these comparisons for the pleasure of seeing extraordinary artists at the height of their careers…I understand comparison fir learning purposes but at this level to compare for whose the best seems silly.
I find Osipova most fascinating to watch... great facial expressions and amazing power & skill but to me she always seems just a touch out of time with the music in the faster sections... almost as if she has the soundtrack in her head rather than listening to the orchestra - I know it is also their job to match the dancer to some degree but even so....
seeing Natalia dance gives me immense emotion, her magnificent interpretation accompanied by a sublime technique and an impressive dynamism make her unique
She is always a very good actress on top of her incredible technique ! in the part of the flowers basket around 11:37 the orchestra is playing so quickly, I had to check the parameters of my video to be sure it was not speeding a little ! Very difficult to follow the pace, she did it of course !
@@tarantellalarouge7632 Honestly, I've always thought she made a great soubrette (like Lise in Fille) but is just recently coming into her own for the more tragic roles like Nikiya.
It's kinda apples and oranges. Osipova's strong, rich performance is flawless both technically and artistically, but I also enjoy very much Nunez's soft elegance.
We all have our favorites and we all have our biases. I am definitely for Nunez. She is for me is the most consistent and reliable ballet dancer out there. The Royal Ballet can't afford to lose her.
"the most consistent and reliable ballet dancer out there?" Both Osipova and Zakharova have perfect technique in a very wide range of roles and Osipova has so much emotions conveyed in her dance, so she would be the most overall perfection of a dancer. Nunez has the simplest choreography of the three. :)
@@natastudyN, with all my respect, I think your comment lacks support. Russians love circus and that's why a former gymnast (Osipova) and a dancer who dances with the stretch (Zakharova) are stars. Imagine both as Carmen... Neither of them controls the turns: one for a lot as a spinning top (piroutte is technique, very different) and the other for a little. Your mistake, it seems, is to belive that it is easy when, actually, Marianela makes it look easy 😊. On the other hand, Núñez has a broader artistic repertoire, you can study if you don't know or belive me.
@@paulagiliberto7386 I have the feeling there are too many ballet-teachers expressing their opinions: ballet is not just moving perfectly to the music, but the highest level of arts which starts with the character analysis, the space expression, the presence, followed by the pantomime and the perfect lines are only one single element of the art. To see in Osipova ONLY the the "lines" and calling all the rest as circus level shows me that your understanding of the ballet art stopped at the ballet bar level. I never saw in Nunez any character analyses, only, yes perfect arm-swings in the "lake of swans", but nothing more.
Natalia Osipova, such a perfect artist. I used to like ballet but she made me LOVE it. She always makes me feel like I'm seeing rhe character, and not her anymore. I love her so much 💕 My second pick here is Svetlana! She was made for ballet, so graceful, such perfect long lines and musicality ♡
1 выступление - это шедевр,от которого невозможно оторваться. Кроме исполнения,сама хореография гениальна. Спасибо,что есть запись,которая сохранила это. Я бы купила целую
Osipova embodies the character of Nikiya. Her movement was a vehicle for portraying the personality of the character, not merely to exemplify her long lines. The other two did not convince me of any specific person or defined character role, just elegant execution of moves. But Osipova wins this one.
У Осиповой самый выразительный танец с корзиной. Умеет она классику преподнести. Светлана с характером, как всегда😃 Нюнез очень артистична. Все хороши.
There’s something about reserved precision that contributes a lot to this role. Stunning lines & stature, immaculate jumps combined with royal reserve and frustration really does it for me. I absolutely loved Zakharova for this role. But 14:53 from Nuñez was beautiful too.
Marianela Nunez -- BEST !!!!! Превосходно! Мурашки бегали по всему телу. Осипова --- да! ну совершенно иное. реально страдает, ты видишь это, веришь этому. переживаешь за нее. Захарова - в пролете. вышла, поделала гимнастику, умерла. всё. нет восточной пластики, все холодно, нет томления. заскучала.
@@eduardasartorio8932 Natalia is not just a ballerina, she is an actress! She is extremely expressive, full of energy, and goes well with villains or complex characters. Marianela is extremely graceful, light and delicate, and fits well with roles such as princesses, peasants and fairies. For example, I don't like Marianela's black swan very much, as she seems very controlled. Osipova made a magnificent and deliciously devilish and seductive black swan. But Osipova's Odette didn't turn out very well, as Natalia added many traits of her black swan to her white swan. Marianela's Odette was perfect, tragic and melancholy with grace.
Natalia is not just a ballerina, she is an actress! She is extremely expressive, full of energy, and goes well with villains or complex characters. Marianela is extremely graceful, light and delicate, and fits well with roles such as princesses, peasants and fairies. For example, I don't like Marianela's black swan very much, as she seems very controlled. Osipova made a magnificent and deliciously devilish and seductive black swan. But Osipova's Odette didn't turn out very well, as Natalia added many traits of her black swan to her white swan. Marianela's Odette was perfect, tragic and melancholy with grace. Marianela: perfect Nikiya. Natalia: perfect Gamzatti
Osipova, like many Russian dancers, shows the gymnast that she used to be. Why are are feet and ankle so strange? Zakharova and Nunez are simply spell binding.
Захарова -- потрясающая танцовщица, как она " танцует" роль, очень выразительная , одно удовольствие смотреть. Танцует ... И "рассказывает " . Обожаю Захарову, Браво!!
Zacharova is perfection. The others, especially Osipova, May covey more emotion, but Zacharova has perfect lines. In my opinion she outshines the other two.
All three brilliant, no doubt. All three mature and character-sensitive dancers. But Núñez's music was terribly slow and heavy, or at least I felt less emotion from the orchestra execution. So hats off to her, who pulled it off no matter the extremely slow tempo.
osipova is my all time favorite nikiya. there is no comparison. the emotion, the technique, the heart. it is like her soul is on stage every time she dances. i think that is why she is so wonderful to watch--for some minutes, you forget all worries and corruption and see this beautiful almost-divine art from.
Захарова совершенно не даёт образа, просто техника, гимнастка в пошловатом костюме. Осипова - это виртуозная техника + образ = настоящий балетный спектакль!
@@catterinax anyone who thinks Ukraine isn't the largest money laundering operation for the United States in the world is ignorant to the situation going on. The war itself is awful but the proxy war for the United States is just a continuation of the corrosive administration that was in place 10 years ago.
All three are beautiful interpretations. I love the grace, the elegance of Nunez and Zahkarova. They move so exquisitely. I wish Osipova wasn't always so fast, she loses so much.
Zakharova is a statue, she has the better lines, precision and extension. But Osipova is an actress, she throws her character's emotion to the audience, every single movements is full of emotion, so her interpretation makes lighter her dance, all seems more natural from her. Maybe Zakharova is the best product of russian's ballet in terms of body and lines (tall, skinny, ethereal), but Osipova reaches better the target of Art (face, gestures and energy)... the Osipova dance is warm, smooth, makes you relize how much emotions feel the character; her dance is the expression of human feelings.
just like how osipova shows emotions. The other ballerinas really fail to portray the despair and frustration. osipova always. Although i have to say this is not my favourite show of her. Her performance in 2008 was better.
Захарова - богиня сцены, которая это осознаёт. Не могу отделаться от ощущения, что смотрю на балерину - красивейшую, идеальную в линиях и движениях, но балерину. Только в концовке после «Это ты змея» начинаю верить ей. Осиповой ту мач в этой записи - трясущиеся руки, искажённое лицо... не знаю, возможно, это особенность пермской постановки, и сцена явно мала, все недостатки как на ладони. Только прыжки на пальцах замечательны, так уже мало кто прыгает, предпочитая с приседаниями. Есть великолепная запись Осиповой в Большом, где она моложе, в замечательной форме и с каноническим исполнением. В той записи она могла бы состязаться, а здесь увы. Марианела... Слов нет, дыхание перехватывает. Тот случай, когда есть танец, есть актерское мастерство и есть вкус это сочетать. У неё играет, «поёт» каждое движение тела, которое как ни у кого передаёт трагедию без лишних актёрств лицом или чем-то ещё. Глядя на ее танец, у единственной, плачешь не от музыки, а потому что веришь ей. Непатриотичный получился отзыв, но Нуньез такая умница, восхищаюсь и обожаю ее!
Полностью согласна с вами по поводу пермской постановки - и сцена мала и сама постановка не удачная. Осипова в Большом в этой партии небо и земля. Есть же записи её в этой вариации из Большого почему не её включили, не понятно. Или в если уж Нунс танцует в хореографии Макаровой, то логично было бы и Осипову поставить в сравнение из Королевского, тоже есть записи.
У Осиповой хороша первая часть. Там удачно переставлено так что жесты выглядят осмысленно. Но после получения корзинки прям цыганочка с выходом :( Захарова Идеальна, но холодновата.
И никто не пишет, что у Осиповой жир на боках, нет талии, короткие ноги, крайне неудачная длина шароваров и, как всегда - раздолбанные стопы. Мама дорогая - что она делает с пуантами, но видеть эти лапти просто невозможно!
i just like how osipova shows emotions. The other ballerinas really fail to portray the despair and frustration. osipova always. Although i have to say this is not my favourite show of her. Her performance in 2008 was better.
That amazing moment with the roses basket is full of passion, pain of love and rage, perfect interpretation, brava Natalia, your broken heart is forever full of LIGHT,💔🥀🥀🥀
Okay they were ALL great performances but Osipova's performance made me feel things. Her whole body was WAILING in pain and anguish. She was so distraught she could hardly control herself. It made me tear up! It was the perfect set up for the desperate joy that came over her when she received the flowers, holding on to the belief that she was still the one Solor loved. And the way the whole cast turned its back on her, turning a blind eye on her suffering while she lay dying was just... CHEF'S KISS! It was such a moving performance.
@@tigra-rx5sf я вообще не умоляю достоинства Захаровой. Просто она очень академичная, а Осипова более заводная и обзорная, её характер хорошо подходит для Китри.
бред захарова в туалет не сходила вот и давит какие то эмоции лебедь ЛОПАТКИНА жизель эсмиральда баядерка ВСЕ ОСИПОВА а захарова только мехмен ебану разве что
@@istvantoth5466 Vita e Vita. Io vedo tanta Vita. Ed é per questo che La amo. Amo Natalia. Amo Svetlana. L'Unicità Le rende incomparabili. Pero' Svetlana ha un Animalità di una Naturalezza ed Eleganza estreme.
@@francescavolchitzamarta5500 Ed io sono anche d'accordo sulla particolare eleganza di Svetlana e sicuramente la Osipova è diversa in questo. Ma se guardiamo le particolare trasformazioni che il ruolo di Giselle richiede, la Osipova centra per 1000%. L'anima vulnerabile della innocenza al inizio richiede una diversa capacità di trasmettere che il dolore della delusione dal tradimento. Ogni volta che vedo la scena con la Osipova, nel cuore, mi pento di ogni delusione che per stupidita io ho creato in vita mia a qualche ragazza, perché sento cosi fortemente il dolore di Giselle.
@@istvantoth5466 per me tutte le Arti e gli Artisti hanno come missione di RISVEGLIARE lo spettatore/fruitore a delle parti di sé (conscie o incoscie). Natalia ha questa Magia su di lei, con Giselle... ha fatto da specchio al suo passato. Ha messo in luce qualcosa che non avrebbe altrimenti visto. Adoro Natalia. Ho molte "Adorate" fra le danzatrici. Ognuna é Unica ed ognuna rivela qualcosa di Profondo, Originale, Unico di Sé, del personaggio, Toccando, Inspirando, Risvegliando il Mio Cuore e la Mia Coscienza secondo la disposizione della mia Anima in quel momento. Non dobbiamo convincere nessuno. L'importante é Ammirare e Riconoscere quel che Ci Tocca, che Ci fa vibrare e ritrovare cosi' alcune parti di Noi. Sono artista anche io e credo che l'Essenziale delle Arti sia proprio il risveglio dell'Essenza (Dell'Anima e della forza Vitale) nelle persone capaci di Aprirsi alla Purezza della Creazione.
После Захаровой, остальные не интересны ( моё скромное мнение) Осиповой - фактуры не хватает, на мой взгляд, не её роль. Нуньес - хорошо, если Захарову не видел. А так, танцуют все отлично.
I understand every single thing that Osipova is trying to say. Her every emotion can be read through her movement. She just does it so well. And her Giselle is the best ever. Although zaharova looks flawless as well and her costume is very well executed. And Im sorry, but im not a fan of nunez.
Светлана Захарова божественно сложна! Её говорящие руки сплошное восхищение!!! В драматическом плане Наталья Осипова всех превзошла!!! Увы, Нуньес не впечатлила.
Watched three times. Cried three times. You can compare, but you cannot say one is better than the other.
Totally agree ❤️
Watching Osipova I could feel her pain , her grief and during the basket scene, it was like someone trying to smile through the tears of a heartbreak. Both Zacharova and Nunez and superb , but for me it is Osipova with her incredibly powerful and moving character interpretation.
I love Zakharova in this kind of role that is so well suited to her elegance and slight reserve. And she is a wonderfully skilled dancer (plus Lantratov and Alexandrova!). But all three are outstanding, of course.
Osipova danced with Alexandrova and Lantratov too)))))
@@GinaGreathouse ballet coppelia.
Zakharova is THE weakest ballerina IN this role. She doesn't use her legs for an expresssiveness. No complex elements of dance are used. It's a weak point of russian modern ballet dancers. Marianela Nunes is THE BEST ONE in this case.Osipova is very expressive either.
@@Леонидов-ь3д ok i agree with you but everyone has their own opinion and taste (art is viewed subjectively). There is no wrong choice here
I love them also.
Osipova isn’t Osipova in this scene bc she literally incorporates Nikiya! 😍
All are beautiful but Osipova literally EMBODIES the role. Every single movement is felt from the heart and runs through her body as she dances and it is captivating to me. I truly believe she IS the character she portrays.
If you MUST compare and declare who's the winner I disagree with you.
She was too perky all of the time and not much waves of quiet anger and sorrow compare to the other 2. They are all fine just leave it at that. OK ?
@@mikiohirata9627 Ok, that's your opinion no worries. We are all allowed opinions and to express them. I just so happen to prefer Osipova's "perky" version, however I don't see how she was perky. She was acting the part, I saw sorrow, anguish and pain. Again, my opinion...no need to get so uppity about my comment.
@@LOVxxE Stop your crying, you're the one being uppity!
@@francisheperi1127 Ok :)
@@mikiohirata9627 Judging by the comments, you lost !!!)) ☝
№1 - Osipova - 23
No. 2 - Zakharova -15
No. 3 - Nunez - 12
So much for OK. ☝😜
Нюнез на мой взгляд лучьше исполнила эту партию чем Захарова,каждое её движение идёт в такт с музыкой и от этого не оторвать глаз.
All three brilliant dancers but Zakharova has something extra, the carriage of the head, the super graceful arms and her incredible line, steel wrapped in silk, superb !
She carries herself like she is 7 feet tall. She is so perfectly stretched out
Every inch of perfection with regal carriage and confidence. Exquisite!
All that is true but I didn't get the sense that her heart is breaking with despair, being forced to dance at the betrothal of Solor and Gamzatti. I did get that with Natalia. I just need to look at her face once, never mind her breathtaking expression and the pathos of her dancing, to feel all that grief. That's what I want from an artist, personally.
Natalia was at that time quite young. I've seen the same scene, where her dance was so mature and excel, that in my mind uncompetable!
Must we compare such beautiful, incredible, grace and artistry? For me, each one has lends her own unique genius to the role.
Totally agree. Interesting though to see Osipova in one role and then on stage with Nunez in the other role and you are right she would have made that her own also.
Very well said . All outstanding snd I think we all have our own preferences. Totally astounded myself in another video - La Fills ( never one of my favourite ballets anyway) but I chose someone else over Osipova! Big shock to my system 🤣🤣🤣 but one must be fair. They’re all beautiful in this as you say 🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺
Thank you. I watch these comparisons for the pleasure of seeing extraordinary artists at the height of their careers…I understand comparison fir learning purposes but at this level to compare for whose the best seems silly.
❤❤❤
Zakharova is Magical,Osipova is gourgeous and Nunes special! ALL these artists from ballet até great 🌹
I find Osipova most fascinating to watch... great facial expressions and amazing power & skill but to me she always seems just a touch out of time with the music in the faster sections... almost as if she has the soundtrack in her head rather than listening to the orchestra - I know it is also their job to match the dancer to some degree but even so....
seeing Natalia dance gives me immense emotion, her magnificent interpretation accompanied by a sublime technique and an impressive dynamism make her unique
Осипова , балерина высший класс , все через себя и как легка
I particularly enjoyed the performance of Osipova. Her expression.. her arms.. her graceful head tilts and fluid movements. Lovely.
Божественная Осипова!!! Восхищение и любовь💖
Osipova the greatest of all time
Svetlana is my favorite !!
Osipovq ..perfect for the role; so dramatic..then Nunez.
Zakharova is like always,for me no salt/pepper in her roles..doesn't convinced me.
Osipova! In addition to gorgeous technique and amplitude, she has incredible artistry.
She is always a very good actress on top of her incredible technique ! in the part of the flowers basket around 11:37 the orchestra is playing so quickly, I had to check the parameters of my video to be sure it was not speeding a little ! Very difficult to follow the pace, she did it of course !
Not understanding "amplitude." Can you explain? Did you mean the height on her jumps?
@@tarantellalarouge7632 Honestly, I've always thought she made a great soubrette (like Lise in Fille) but is just recently coming into her own for the more tragic roles like Nikiya.
@@minissa2009 in French "amplitude" means the height and also the length of the jumps
She's just supreme perfection, her interpretation brings me to to tears, as always.
It's kinda apples and oranges. Osipova's strong, rich performance is flawless both technically and artistically, but I also enjoy very much Nunez's soft elegance.
We all have our favorites and we all have our biases. I am definitely for Nunez. She is for me is the most consistent and reliable ballet dancer out there. The Royal Ballet can't afford to lose her.
👏👏👏👏👏
I completely agree with you
"the most consistent and reliable ballet dancer out there?" Both Osipova and Zakharova have perfect technique in a very wide range of roles and Osipova has so much emotions conveyed in her dance, so she would be the most overall perfection of a dancer. Nunez has the simplest choreography of the three. :)
@@natastudyN, with all my respect, I think your comment lacks support. Russians love circus and that's why a former gymnast (Osipova) and a dancer who dances with the stretch (Zakharova) are stars. Imagine both as Carmen...
Neither of them controls the turns: one for a lot as a spinning top (piroutte is technique, very different) and the other for a little.
Your mistake, it seems, is to belive that it is easy when, actually, Marianela makes it look easy 😊.
On the other hand, Núñez has a broader artistic repertoire, you can study if you don't know or belive me.
@@paulagiliberto7386 I have the feeling there are too many ballet-teachers expressing their opinions: ballet is not just moving perfectly to the music, but the highest level of arts which starts with the character analysis, the space expression, the presence, followed by the pantomime and the perfect lines are only one single element of the art. To see in Osipova ONLY the the "lines" and calling all the rest as circus level shows me that your understanding of the ballet art stopped at the ballet bar level. I never saw in Nunez any character analyses, only, yes perfect arm-swings in the "lake of swans", but nothing more.
Zakharova just kills it in this one
редкий случай, когда сравнивать нельзя! Каждая прекрасна по-своему.
Осипова - лучшая!!!
Natalia Osipova, such a perfect artist. I used to like ballet but she made me LOVE it. She always makes me feel like I'm seeing rhe character, and not her anymore. I love her so much 💕
My second pick here is Svetlana! She was made for ballet, so graceful, such perfect long lines and musicality ♡
They are all fantastic in their own way. But, I could watch Marianela bouree all day.
1 выступление - это шедевр,от которого невозможно оторваться. Кроме исполнения,сама хореография гениальна. Спасибо,что есть запись,которая сохранила это. Я бы купила целую
Osipova embodies the character of Nikiya. Her movement was a vehicle for portraying the personality of the character, not merely to exemplify her long lines. The other two did not convince me of any specific person or defined character role, just elegant execution of moves. But Osipova wins this one.
Осипова--- восторг!!! техниная, гибкая, нежная, хорошо сложена ( на швабра з), пластична!!
Захарова самая лучшая 👍👍💐💐
У Осиповой самый выразительный танец с корзиной. Умеет она классику преподнести.
Светлана с характером, как всегда😃
Нюнез очень артистична.
Все хороши.
I’m gettting querious about full story!!!so beautiful!!!
Восхищение и любовь bravo Zakharova
Осипова бесподобна!
Здесь с Захаровой никто не может сравниться, даже и обсуждать нечего.
Natalia estás bailando la oración de Nikiya pidiendo justicia antes de la inesperada muerte, bailas como la llamarada de un fuego enrojecido. BRAVA
There’s something about reserved precision that contributes a lot to this role. Stunning lines & stature, immaculate jumps combined with royal reserve and frustration really does it for me. I absolutely loved Zakharova for this role. But 14:53 from Nuñez was beautiful too.
Marianela Nunez -- BEST !!!!! Превосходно! Мурашки бегали по всему телу. Осипова --- да! ну совершенно иное. реально страдает, ты видишь это, веришь этому. переживаешь за нее. Захарова - в пролете. вышла, поделала гимнастику, умерла. всё. нет восточной пластики, все холодно, нет томления. заскучала.
@катерина-ь4з вы правы на счет Захаровой и танцует она без души
Осипова - легка необыкновенна!!!
Magistral interpretación de Marianela Núñez !!!! Maravillosa !!!!
Verdade , os Argentinos estão muito bem representados por está linda bailarina.
댓글을 안 달 수가 없네... 일단 자하로바가 압권인 게 무대 장치, 스케일, 뒷쪽 무희들 포지션...기타 등등 다른 편 발레에서는 볼 수 없는 디테일함과 두말하면 잔소리인 자하로바의 춤과 드라마틱한 연기까지 흠 잡을게 없다. 넘사벽 자하로바♡♡
Nuñez as Nikiya, Osipova as Gamzatti, and Muntagirov as Solor is just *chef’s kiss*
I prefer the opposite (Nuñez is one of my favorite Gamzattis and Osipova is one of my favorite Nikiyas)! 😍
This combo made La Bayadère my favourite ballet :')
@@eduardasartorio8932 Natalia is not just a ballerina, she is an actress! She is extremely expressive, full of energy, and goes well with villains or complex characters. Marianela is extremely graceful, light and delicate, and fits well with roles such as princesses, peasants and fairies. For example, I don't like Marianela's black swan very much, as she seems very controlled. Osipova made a magnificent and deliciously devilish and seductive black swan. But Osipova's Odette didn't turn out very well, as Natalia added many traits of her black swan to her white swan. Marianela's Odette was perfect, tragic and melancholy with grace.
I wish Osipova could dance every role. Even Solor's :D
Gorgeous performances, but Natalia Osipova is the epitome of a Star Ballerina! ICONIC!
Natalia is not just a ballerina, she is an actress! She is extremely expressive, full of energy, and goes well with villains or complex characters. Marianela is extremely graceful, light and delicate, and fits well with roles such as princesses, peasants and fairies. For example, I don't like Marianela's black swan very much, as she seems very controlled. Osipova made a magnificent and deliciously devilish and seductive black swan. But Osipova's Odette didn't turn out very well, as Natalia added many traits of her black swan to her white swan. Marianela's Odette was perfect, tragic and melancholy with grace. Marianela: perfect Nikiya. Natalia: perfect Gamzatti
Osipova, like many Russian dancers, shows the gymnast that she used to be. Why are are feet and ankle so strange? Zakharova and Nunez are simply spell binding.
@@serenashaw-q3y Her feet and ankles are incredibly strong, that's what shows.
Очень замедлен темп на танце Никии в исполнении Захаровой. Оркестр умирает?
Marianela Núñez is sensational.
Захарова -- потрясающая танцовщица, как она " танцует" роль, очень выразительная , одно удовольствие смотреть. Танцует ... И "рассказывает " . Обожаю Захарову, Браво!!
Захарова божественна,какие руки!Это просто фантастика
Zacharova is perfection. The others, especially Osipova, May covey more emotion, but Zacharova has perfect lines. In my opinion she outshines the other two.
All three brilliant, no doubt. All three mature and character-sensitive dancers. But Núñez's music was terribly slow and heavy, or at least I felt less emotion from the orchestra execution. So hats off to her, who pulled it off no matter the extremely slow tempo.
osipova is my all time favorite nikiya. there is no comparison. the emotion, the technique, the heart. it is like her soul is on stage every time she dances. i think that is why she is so wonderful to watch--for some minutes, you forget all worries and corruption and see this beautiful almost-divine art from.
Whatever.
Sehr schön getanzt aber die Tänzerin ist viel zu dünn.
Захарова совершенно не даёт образа, просто техника, гимнастка в пошловатом костюме. Осипова - это виртуозная техника + образ = настоящий балетный спектакль!
Marianela💜💜💜
Oh man i loved to see nunez and osipova acting together in that royal ballet production they are both so good and so different from each other
yes, I believe they rotated roles in the Royal Ballet production.
Zacharowa ma najwięcej gracji, elegancji. Mnie podobała się najbardziej.
Três maravilhosas, mas Esvetlana é rainha .
It's a shame that she's such a terrible person especially in her attitude towards Ukraine.
@@catterinax first dive deeper into a conflict, then make any conclusions
@@yuliyarue1804 I know more than you assume that I do.
@@catterinax anyone who thinks Ukraine isn't the largest money laundering operation for the United States in the world is ignorant to the situation going on. The war itself is awful but the proxy war for the United States is just a continuation of the corrosive administration that was in place 10 years ago.
Конечно Осипова восхитительна!
все восхитительны
Все прекрасны, но Осипова перетанцевала Захарову: ее восточная пластика потрясающа!
@@ТатьянаКулябко Захарову невозможно перетанцевать, это икона
@@irinastown2115 очень даже можно, что многие и делают.
@@НатальяПетренко-ж5м Да делают, с кривыми ножками и несуразной фигурой))
Natasha is best for me!
Osipova ..osipova....the best
All three are beautiful interpretations. I love the grace, the elegance of Nunez and Zahkarova. They move so exquisitely. I wish Osipova wasn't always so fast, she loses so much.
None can compete with Altynai Zarmutova period.
Nunez wins this one.
AWESOME Osipova 👏👏👏
Прекраснейший балет каждая танцовщица в чём то превосходит другую но больше смотрится Осипова
Zakharova is a statue, she has the better lines, precision and extension. But Osipova is an actress, she throws her character's emotion to the audience, every single movements is full of emotion, so her interpretation makes lighter her dance, all seems more natural from her.
Maybe Zakharova is the best product of russian's ballet in terms of body and lines (tall, skinny, ethereal), but Osipova reaches better the target of Art (face, gestures and energy)... the Osipova dance is warm, smooth, makes you relize how much emotions feel the character; her dance is the expression of human feelings.
Все большие молодчинки:Осипова хороша ,а постановка спектакля,мне понравилась с Nunez.Браво!
Странное мнение.
Упрощённая быстрая часть.. совершенно не смотрится ни с Захаровой, ни с Осиповой тем более.
just like how osipova shows emotions. The other ballerinas really fail to portray the despair and frustration. osipova always. Although i have to say this is not my favourite show of her. Her performance in 2008 was better.
Yes, much better!!!
Захарова - богиня сцены, которая это осознаёт. Не могу отделаться от ощущения, что смотрю на балерину - красивейшую, идеальную в линиях и движениях, но балерину. Только в концовке после «Это ты змея» начинаю верить ей.
Осиповой ту мач в этой записи - трясущиеся руки, искажённое лицо... не знаю, возможно, это особенность пермской постановки, и сцена явно мала, все недостатки как на ладони.
Только прыжки на пальцах замечательны, так уже мало кто прыгает, предпочитая с приседаниями. Есть великолепная запись Осиповой в Большом, где она моложе, в замечательной форме и с каноническим исполнением. В той записи она могла бы состязаться, а здесь увы.
Марианела... Слов нет, дыхание перехватывает. Тот случай, когда есть танец, есть актерское мастерство и есть вкус это сочетать. У неё играет, «поёт» каждое движение тела, которое как ни у кого передаёт трагедию без лишних актёрств лицом или чем-то ещё.
Глядя на ее танец, у единственной, плачешь не от музыки, а потому что веришь ей.
Непатриотичный получился отзыв, но Нуньез такая умница, восхищаюсь и обожаю ее!
Полностью согласна с вами по поводу пермской постановки - и сцена мала и сама постановка не удачная. Осипова в Большом в этой партии небо и земля. Есть же записи её в этой вариации из Большого почему не её включили, не понятно. Или в если уж Нунс танцует в хореографии Макаровой, то логично было бы и Осипову поставить в сравнение из Королевского, тоже есть записи.
От Захаровой невозможно оторваться, чудо как хороша, но Нуньес побеждает актерским мастерством. Осипова здесь проигрывает обеим.
Каждому свое.Осипова хороша
У Осиповой хороша первая часть. Там удачно переставлено так что жесты выглядят осмысленно. Но после получения корзинки прям цыганочка с выходом :( Захарова Идеальна, но холодновата.
И никто не пишет, что у Осиповой жир на боках, нет талии, короткие ноги, крайне неудачная длина шароваров и, как всегда - раздолбанные стопы. Мама дорогая - что она делает с пуантами, но видеть эти лапти просто невозможно!
i just like how osipova shows emotions. The other ballerinas really fail to portray the despair and frustration. osipova always. Although i have to say this is not my favourite show of her. Her performance in 2008 was better.
Agree, 2008 was mach more intense. Nevertheless also here she was the stronger actor to transmit emotions.
Zacarova as Nikiya, Osipova Gatmazi, ❤️❤️❤️
Natalia Osipova, she is perfect !!!
That amazing moment with the roses basket is full of passion, pain of love and rage, perfect interpretation, brava Natalia, your broken heart is forever full of LIGHT,💔🥀🥀🥀
Okay they were ALL great performances but Osipova's performance made me feel things. Her whole body was WAILING in pain and anguish. She was so distraught she could hardly control herself. It made me tear up! It was the perfect set up for the desperate joy that came over her when she received the flowers, holding on to the belief that she was still the one Solor loved. And the way the whole cast turned its back on her, turning a blind eye on her suffering while she lay dying was just... CHEF'S KISS! It was such a moving performance.
Осипова бы точно выжила. А змеюка погибла от нагрузок
🤣😂👍Ржу , не могу !!!))))😜
Jaaaaaa very good
😀😀😀👏
All three are gorgeous, but Zakharova’s Nikiya is exquisite and unbeatable in my opinion
I agree stunning !
osipova wow
Ese ballet es como si fuera hecho específicamente para Zakharova, sus líneas son hermosísimas!
Nela 👑. Perfect
I love a lot Marianela´s performance, her smile is plenty of joy and grace! perfect in this role.
Захарова... это Захарова! видела ее в Кармен - уникальная балерина👏👏👏👏👏👏
Первая часть за Захаровой. Но в Осиповой больше энергии что ли. Её танец это нечто. И ещё мне в Захаровой не нравится некая медлительность. Излишняя
@@ЛарисаШапошникова-о2з видела Осипову...профи! А Захарова бриллиантовая профи👏👏👏
Только мое мнение...
@@tigra-rx5sf я вообще не умоляю достоинства Захаровой. Просто она очень академичная, а Осипова более заводная и обзорная, её характер хорошо подходит для Китри.
@@ЛарисаШапошникова-о2зсогласна, ее роль, 100% попадание!👏👏👏
Nuñez version is the most elegant execution
Потрясающие танцовщицы! Захарова примаАБСОЛЮТ! ВСЕМ БРАВО!👏👏👏💐
Да но у неё полное отсутствие талии хотя танцует отлично
Её штормит, видно, что сложно удерживать равновесие
Абсолютно неподражаемая и технически и характерная .... феномен балета - Захарова...
бред захарова в туалет не сходила вот и давит какие то эмоции лебедь ЛОПАТКИНА жизель эсмиральда баядерка ВСЕ ОСИПОВА а захарова только мехмен ебану разве что
Tutte Bravissime, Magnifiche ma Svetlana per me é Sublime
Come darti torto 🥰
Si, sublime, ma la Osipova riesce unire e trasmettere vita e morte nei sui eccessi!
@@istvantoth5466 Vita e Vita. Io vedo tanta Vita. Ed é per questo che La amo. Amo Natalia. Amo Svetlana. L'Unicità Le rende incomparabili. Pero' Svetlana ha un Animalità di una Naturalezza ed Eleganza estreme.
@@francescavolchitzamarta5500 Ed io sono anche d'accordo sulla particolare eleganza di Svetlana e sicuramente la Osipova è diversa in questo. Ma se guardiamo le particolare trasformazioni che il ruolo di Giselle richiede, la Osipova centra per 1000%. L'anima vulnerabile della innocenza al inizio richiede una diversa capacità di trasmettere che il dolore della delusione dal tradimento. Ogni volta che vedo la scena con la Osipova, nel cuore, mi pento di ogni delusione che per stupidita io ho creato in vita mia a qualche ragazza, perché sento cosi fortemente il dolore di Giselle.
@@istvantoth5466 per me tutte le Arti e gli Artisti hanno come missione di RISVEGLIARE lo spettatore/fruitore a delle parti di sé (conscie o incoscie). Natalia ha questa Magia su di lei, con Giselle... ha fatto da specchio al suo passato. Ha messo in luce qualcosa che non avrebbe altrimenti visto. Adoro Natalia. Ho molte "Adorate" fra le danzatrici. Ognuna é Unica ed ognuna rivela qualcosa di Profondo, Originale, Unico di Sé, del personaggio, Toccando, Inspirando, Risvegliando il Mio Cuore e la Mia Coscienza secondo la disposizione della mia Anima in quel momento. Non dobbiamo convincere nessuno. L'importante é Ammirare e Riconoscere quel che Ci Tocca, che Ci fa vibrare e ritrovare cosi' alcune parti di Noi. Sono artista anche io e credo che l'Essenziale delle Arti sia proprio il risveglio dell'Essenza (Dell'Anima e della forza Vitale) nelle persone capaci di Aprirsi alla Purezza della Creazione.
Zakharova
Nunez ❤, but the best nikia ever is Altınay
Аргентинский темперамент Нуньез отлично добавляет восточного колорита Никии. Все-таки, Нуньез лучшая в этой роли. ИМХО.
Marinela Nunez makes me crying, so intense!!!
Браво, Осипова! В любой партии шикарна.
Захарова - СОВЕРШЕНСТВО - ЭТАЛОН❗Даже сравнивать смешно !!!
@@MiMOZA775 Осипова пластична женственна а Захарова мужеподобна ну швабра правда прекрасно танцуют обе
@@MiMOZA775вы правы,сравнивать смешно. Захарова танцует без души какую бы партию не исполняла.
Once again, Osipova wins!
Jajaja in your dreams
@@paulagiliberto7386 It's ON!
Nobody wins, , an idiot’s point of view !
@@jenylogan1 So who is the idiot?
@@erinfleming4878 t
После Захаровой, остальные не интересны ( моё скромное мнение)
Осиповой - фактуры не хватает, на мой взгляд, не её роль. Нуньес - хорошо, если Захарову не видел.
А так, танцуют все отлично.
3 amazing dancers but Zakharova is the queen
It’s funny cause Natalia ospiova is gamzati during marianela Nunez as nikiya
Marianela Nunez maravilhosa!
Zakharova and great interpretation Marianela .But all three are Fantastic . Love them ALL..
Lindas apresentaçoes!As tres bailarinas sao maravilhosas!
Осипова очень хороша, браво!
Nunez, 100%
Grandes bailarinas, pero lejos la más bella, talentosisima y carismática NATALIA OSIPOVA 🌹🌹🌹🌹
I love all of this, but Nunez have my attention
Although i have to say nunez is actually good in this role
Marianela is stunning!!! Perfection!!!
Nuñez forever
I understand every single thing that Osipova is trying to say. Her every emotion can be read through her movement. She just does it so well. And her Giselle is the best ever. Although zaharova looks flawless as well and her costume is very well executed. And Im sorry, but im not a fan of nunez.
Светлана Захарова божественно сложна! Её говорящие руки сплошное восхищение!!! В драматическом плане Наталья Осипова всех превзошла!!! Увы, Нуньес не впечатлила.