Lol. He can't keep the act up the entire time. Obviously he understands every word without reading when he wants to. He is still fast and witty, wary and sneaky and he so wants to show the prosecutor how he is still on top of his game. The man just can't help himself. What a show.
This is the thing about aging, it becomes more and more difficult to keep up with all the lying. My goodness, I just do not know how this prosecutor is able to keep this going and not completely implode. John Lewin is clearly a very patient man.
Mr. Lewin is a machine. I'm at work and I can't stop listening to this. Durst DEFINITELY didn't get his money's worth from his attorneys. They didn't do their homework nor much due diligence in much of this case. They didn't seem to know where Durst s wife chose to work. How could you miss that? All of these years passed and even Durst himself never knew. You'd think the attorneys would have done their due diligence to discover this fact so that their client (and they themselves) wouldn't have been caught with their pants down! It seems that their only strategy was to ignore Durst s lies and go on and muddy up the victims. Didn't work in his trial. They were outmatched and never had a chance from the beginning. Kudos to you Mr. Lewin!!
I've never heard so much talk about "if we were ever to get a divorce" between a husband and wife who were not getting a divorce. And whose wife had two divorce lawyers. So yeah. No one with a kindergarten education would believe anything Robert says.
@@darlakenward6276 Their divorce “talks” occurred in the 80’s. According to US statistics in 1982 (yr Kathy was killed), approx 50% of all 1st marriages ended in divorce. Whereas, in 2020, a little over 40% of all 1st marriages ended in divorce. Course people on 2nd, 3rd marriages have a lot higher odds than these. It does fly against what I think most people would perceive of what life was like then as compared to now, but that’s the numbers. (As strange as it seems at 1st glance)
I watched The Jinx last night...his eyes are dead! He's a disgusting excuse for a human being! He's the maker of his own undoing and leaving his mike on at the end and talking to himself was the nail in his coffin! He'll be leaving jail in a box..no way he's let free after this!
Sounds like Bob may. have been the one at rehab. Or his family made charitable contributions and they attended VIP where they gave talks about how the rehab worked. Even if she did attend the program, I doubt given the state of their marriage Kathie would have talked to Bob about going to rehab because she may have believed it could affect her settlement in the divorce
I’m no expert, but in order to prove motive for killing Susan Berman, the court needs to show how abusive he was to Kathy and that he has always been suspected in her disappearance. Susan Berman, it is alleged, helped Durst cover up the fact that he got rid of Kathy. The case about Kathy was reopened, so Susan could be seen as a loose end. Also, Durst has told so many lies, detangling it all to show what a liar he is will ruin his credibility.
To get to Susan’s murder there has to be a connection attempted that Susan helped cover up Kathy’s ‘disappearance’ by calling the dean at the medical school Monday morning to say she was sick and wouldn’t be in. Susan also dealt with media for Bob after ‘disappearance’ became public. Susan told Bob in fall of 2000 (or whatever year Susan was murdered) that Jeanine Pirro as DA in westChester county had reopened Kathy’s disappearance. Susan was very broke...borrowing money from friends for living expenses...(though I believe she was behind on her rent and owner was trying to get her evicted.)! She told Bob she had been contacted and had agreed to be questioned for Kathy’s disappearance.......in fact, Susan had not talked to NY DA but told Bob she had it is believed so he would send/let her borrow more money. That is why Bob flew into northern CA and drove to LA (with his cell phone turned off except on a couple occasions when he powered it up and it pinged on cell towers closer to LA. I believe Susan thought if she kept her nose to the computer screen she would hit on a successful manuscript....and then pay back those who gave her money. Bob believed Susan was contacted and was going to be questioned by WestChester DA office. Bob forever silenced her and in probably the only time he has ever been caring....he wrote cadaver note so police would find her body sooner than later. (If he really cared he wouldn’t have killed her....and he is so wealthy....he’d rather kill her than give her a million or 2 dollars because he cared and to keep her loyal.)! When Lewin flew to New Orleans on Bob’s arrest...he told Bob that in fact, Susan had neither been contacted by Westchester DA and there was no plans in motion for her to be questioned.....Bob reacts to this news a bit stunned. I understand you don’t have to prove a motive in CA....but with only the cadaver note addressed to police by Bob....he always misspelled Beverly. There is only hear say and circumstantial evidence so the motive is important to tie it altogether.
Omg Kathie’s boyfriend was Jill Biden’s first husband? And Bob was having an affair with Mia Farrow’s little sister? How does this story have more and more surprises?
Lewin went on and on about the fact Durst was smiling and was annoyed about it but when Durst asks him to repeat questions, Lewin chuckles! I get that it’s frustrating but get professional and get on with it !… next question! And what about Susan?
There are glimpses of the real Durst. He can’t help himself. To repeat back verbatim what a witness said & then claim he didn’t remember key info is absolutely ridiculous
And it just gets more interesting every day. The defense is trying absolutely every trick in the book. Idk if they're trying to set up and appeals case or what.
Clearly they’re making a record for appeal. But, they know that Bob will never live long enough to get through the entire appellate process (many YEARS). They understand perfectly that he’ll never be acquitted. So, their only hope is a mistrial or hung jury, at which time they’d move for medical release, pending the new trial.
I’m sure the law/rules Re patient records was very different 40 yrs ago? I know it was here in the UK as I was a nurse training during the 70s and 80s.
The federal regulation the defense referred too was passed in 1975. However, it only pertained to what records could be released to people, other than the patient, requesting copies of the records.
@@YourPsychDoc guess you don't understand the old man pauses an when he is asked certain questions he is flipping them back on prosecution in return the prosecution does not have an answer an he is laughing an explaining to the prosecutor he knows they are asking him the same question just in a different way. He knows when to be short an he knows when to push back the man was not a multimillionaire because he was stupid .
I thought Lewin was expected to do a great job on cross examination. Durst is playing his like a fiddle. Meanwhile the jury must be asleep. 40 days of trial and millions in taxpayers money and this case is a circus.
This Judge is extremely unprofessional and unethical. He agreed that he also saw Durst smile?? He was sucking up by literally bowing with a prayer sign to Douglas Durst awhile back and now this? Durst is guilty but it’s a shame to see someone who is supposed to know law behave like this. He is unfairly influencing the jury and knows it. He is also making California look like a bigger joke than it already is. I think the defense should call for a higher court to look into his behavior and to reprimand him.
@@RipperTH-camOfficial because he has an impeccable reputation AND nothing he did was unethical? But the defense has repeatedly done unethical things, such as continually trying to introduce evidence that they strategically chose not to admit until it was too late and now regret? And that “evidence” is incredibly flawed and would have been destroyed?
His voice grates on my nerves. When he seethed and said "your'e like a rat trapped in a cage" the other day is when I almost lost it. So unprofessional.
@@hubbleandtrouble , I feel sorry for the jury. They can’t leave when they can’t take anymore. They need to start rolling their eyes when anything having to do with the movie comes up. Movie is fantasy,, building fantasy.
This prosecutor has made this so personal that it’s hard to focus on what really happened. If they lose the case it’s his fault solely! He’s an idiot with a short fuse.
It’s sad, but I appreciate him! Considering the state of California… I do not blame him for passionately fighting for the victims and families. Circumstantial evidence is still evidence. There’s a reason Durst wants to be in California 🙄
EXACTLY 💯 mr lewin if someone is going through rehab especially working as a doctor other professionals would need to know about it, files are not private in the medical system, durst is telling Peter pan tales no one should believe that story 😑
The guy crossing examining him acts like he's going to jump up and strangle the guy and he meant it I mean come on get real why is the court even allowing this guy to continue to cross-examine him in that way it's wrong I don't care what he did it's wrong he has rights.. that guy shouldn't even be in a courtroom I don't know where he came from but he shouldn't even be in there he can't control himself he has serious issues.
@@maryb6672 I don't have a particular issue with Lewin but with the way the trial is being conducted. The judge doesn't seem to have much authority in his court. I guess people are criticising Lewin because the defendant is clearly frail and unwell, although that wasn't always the case.
No one of the problems for you is you're going to ask you want to bully the guy he wants to say he's got a problem with his hearing good God you know that ain't true he's sitting there bullying this guy like he's got a vindictive personal issue against him his behavior and his actions are wrong
I am having trouble with Lewin tone and badgering in his questioning, the judge being so flippant playing to jurors and the live stream. I would like them to conduct theirselves as if this is trial of a murdered woman ( my opinion 2 women)......all the incessant joking by judge and lewin. So unprofessional...and yes we have another LA murder trial when the judge doesn’t control his courtroom as Lewin acts in any response like he is the judge. Lewin acts the way he does because he is not being reigned in by this judge. According to judge....CA law allows badgering, attorney can ask basically same question over and over and judge says in CA law allows that. This is nuts and I believe the defense will have grounds for new trial by Lewin and the judge’s missteps.
An attorney is allowed to continue asking the same question over & over until the witness actually answers the question asked. So far, Bob has RARELY answered what he’s been asked.
Just to point out, Lewin is hard of hearing. He has hearing aids in both ears. It’s kind of funny, honestly, when neither of them can quite hear the other. Humor is a normal, human response. Both sides have made jokes, as has the judge. It’s actually taught in law school as a technique to help the juries not feel overwhelmed by the tragedy and seriousness of a case.
What do you have with the voice of Mr. Lewin. You don't know about prosecutors in dictatorial regimes. Mr. LEWIN IS TOO TOLERANT AS PROSECUTOR! Mr. Durst, sorry Sir... Was claimed to Mr. DeGuerin, immediately. I am convince that Mr DeGuerin is overload of Mr. Durst lies. But, he is the Attorney of Defence.
Kathys BF ended the affair so he could go back to his fiancé! Something could have happened between the two that night!! If Kathy was use to having physical fights with Bob and tried it out w her lover; maybe fat met greasy?
doubtful Durst has slipped up too many times especially saying that when the NY DA reopened the case and asked what they were looking for he said probably body parts - not a body. Given his propensity for bow saws....Too many of Susan's friends were told she was keeping a very serious secret for him
The “goombah” Lewin prosecutor’s behavior is too aggressive and clearly shows disrespect while the judge and defense attorney is attempting to speak . He’s just too cocky for his own good. He acts like a big bully. The judge even had to speak to him about it.
He committed many crimes when he was young and able bodied. Don’t fall for this theatre- Just because you’re old and sick now doesn’t mean you didn’t make hateful, cruel choices in your youth.
This prosecutor is a joke. Supposedly he successfully prosecuted numerous cold cases and was then deemed skillful. All I am seeing is someone who is fumbling through this case, throwing mini tantrums, with repeated unsuccessful attempts to manipulate and change the narrative of what Durst is testifying. All he is doing is insinuating, accusatory, then combative when it doesn't work. If the judge was paying attention and not partial to the prosecutor, he wouldn't be allowed to continue this shameful injustice. He is NOT skilled at all. This makes me question the guilt of any defendant he obtained a conviction for. This judge is also a joke. Shameful
@@jayv4250 he’s not. He’s a highly respected cold case prosecutor who has a 100% success rate. He plays self-deprecating because it allows them to underestimate him, then he destroys them.
Lewin is on 🔥🔥🔥🔥💥 get the popcorn out, this is riveting cross!
If one of my loved ones were killed, I'd want this prosecutor on my team. He takes it personal, like it's one of his loved ones he's fighting for.
What a precious human being he is!
@@singinginthesunshine857 agree. His line of questioning is inescapable
Lol. He can't keep the act up the entire time. Obviously he understands every word without reading when he wants to. He is still fast and witty, wary and sneaky and he so wants to show the prosecutor how he is still on top of his game. The man just can't help himself. What a show.
Well said 👍
Yea super obvious how he has to read when he has to think about the answer, vs. how he answers right away when he doesn’t
@@ameenaah12 he didn't think anywhere as long when defense asked him questions and he rambled on and on!!
Durst is not used to being confronted about his lies. I am loving it.
This is the thing about aging, it becomes more and more difficult to keep up with all the lying. My goodness, I just do not know how this prosecutor is able to keep this going and not completely implode. John Lewin is clearly a very patient man.
Mr. Lewin is a machine. I'm at work and I can't stop listening to this. Durst DEFINITELY didn't get his money's worth from his attorneys. They didn't do their homework nor much due diligence in much of this case. They didn't seem to know where Durst s wife chose to work. How could you miss that? All of these years passed and even Durst himself never knew. You'd think the attorneys would have done their due diligence to discover this fact so that their client (and they themselves) wouldn't have been caught with their pants down!
It seems that their only strategy was to ignore Durst s lies and go on and muddy up the victims. Didn't work in his trial.
They were outmatched and never had a chance from the beginning.
Kudos to you Mr. Lewin!!
I've never heard so much talk about "if we were ever to get a divorce" between a husband and wife who were not getting a divorce. And whose wife had two divorce lawyers. So yeah. No one with a kindergarten education would believe anything Robert says.
@@darlakenward6276 Their divorce “talks” occurred in the 80’s. According to US statistics in 1982 (yr Kathy was killed), approx 50% of all 1st marriages ended in divorce. Whereas, in 2020, a little over 40% of all 1st marriages ended in divorce. Course people on 2nd, 3rd marriages have a lot higher odds than these. It does fly against what I think most people would perceive of what life was like then as compared to now, but that’s the numbers. (As strange as it seems at 1st glance)
God bless you Mr. Lewin
“Do you think this line of questioning is funny?”
- “I think this line of questioning is ridiculous.”
(commence stare down)
He’s a good example of why court or legal system shouldn’t wait this long to try a case or charge someone
"Maybe they went on a cruise " 🤣🤣 you can't make this stuff up...
Question is not answerable because he already explained he shouldn’t have answered about the 3 murder hypothetical. And the question is absurd.
He said he shouldn’t have answered them again today by saying because it’s not true -
Hi I'm confused about the trial videos numbering could someone please help🤕 thanks.
Yes, he could have done so much good with that money. You would think 🤔he would have had scholarships for medical in Kathy's name, something
He sets him up & then knocks him down. Great Prosecutors
I watched The Jinx last night...his eyes are dead! He's a disgusting excuse for a human being! He's the maker of his own undoing and leaving his mike on at the end and talking to himself was the nail in his coffin! He'll be leaving jail in a box..no way he's let free after this!
Cannot WAIT to hear this mysterious boyfriend’s name and see him on the stand
Jill Bidens ex claims he was Kathys boyfriend. Look it up.
@@darlakenward6276 yet Durst can pick and choose what he deems truthful from the movies one of which was a truthful documentary ?🤷♀️ 🍿 🎪
@@suzanneschmidt3755 bill Stevenson? Lol 😂
@@MV-se1ke yes, Bill Stevenson
Look it up, he gave multiple interviews about it
Sounds like Bob may. have been the one at rehab. Or his family made charitable contributions and they attended VIP where they gave talks about how the rehab worked. Even if she did attend the program, I doubt given the state of their marriage Kathie would have talked to Bob about
going to rehab because she may have believed it could affect her settlement in the divorce
He admitted he went to rehab there. He is projecting his drug rehab onto her.
Lennox Hill Hospital didn’t have a drug rehab program in 1982, according to Charlie Bagli. I think his lawyers coached him as best they could.
A lonely pitiful life is right in front of our faces. If he takes a breath a lie falls out of his ugly mouth.
The smile is called dupers delight
This trial should be focused on Susan why is everything about Kathy and Morris?
I’m no expert, but in order to prove motive for killing Susan Berman, the court needs to show how abusive he was to Kathy and that he has always been suspected in her disappearance. Susan Berman, it is alleged, helped Durst cover up the fact that he got rid of Kathy. The case about Kathy was reopened, so Susan could be seen as a loose end. Also, Durst has told so many lies, detangling it all to show what a liar he is will ruin his credibility.
@@sallyb6030 The prosecution does not have to prove motive.
@@darlakenward6276 The CA Court of Appeals already denied the defenses pretrial petition to have all the evidence excluded from this trial.
To get to Susan’s murder there has to be a connection attempted that Susan helped cover up Kathy’s ‘disappearance’ by calling the dean at the medical school Monday morning to say she was sick and wouldn’t be in. Susan also dealt with media for Bob after ‘disappearance’ became public.
Susan told Bob in fall of 2000 (or whatever year Susan was murdered) that Jeanine Pirro as DA in westChester county had reopened Kathy’s disappearance. Susan was very broke...borrowing money from friends for living expenses...(though I believe she was behind on her rent and owner was trying to get her evicted.)! She told Bob she had been contacted and had agreed to be questioned for Kathy’s disappearance.......in fact, Susan had not talked to NY DA but told Bob she had it is believed so he would send/let her borrow more money. That is why Bob flew into northern CA and drove to LA (with his cell phone turned off except on a couple occasions when he powered it up and it pinged on cell towers closer to LA.
I believe Susan thought if she kept her nose to the computer screen she would hit on a successful manuscript....and then pay back those who gave her money. Bob believed Susan was contacted and was going to be questioned by WestChester DA office. Bob forever silenced her and in probably the only time he has ever been caring....he wrote cadaver note so police would find her body sooner than later. (If he really cared he wouldn’t have killed her....and he is so wealthy....he’d rather kill her than give her a million or 2 dollars because he cared and to keep her loyal.)! When Lewin flew to New Orleans on Bob’s arrest...he told Bob that in fact, Susan had neither been contacted by Westchester DA and there was no plans in motion for her to be questioned.....Bob reacts to this news a bit stunned.
I understand you don’t have to prove a motive in CA....but with only the cadaver note addressed to police by Bob....he always misspelled Beverly. There is only hear say and circumstantial evidence so the motive is important to tie it altogether.
@@taylormitchell1882 Very well said.
I haven’t seen somebody lie so much since the documentary called “The Jinx”. 😂
He was more honest in that doc. They're using a lot of his answers to contradict his lies.
Omg Kathie’s boyfriend was Jill Biden’s first husband? And Bob was having an affair with Mia Farrow’s little sister? How does this story have more and more surprises?
The “Jill’s ex-husband” angle is highly suss and almost certainly not true.
This trial is 100 times funnier when you’re watching it with some lemon OG Kush.
A person could be in drug therapy because she was asked to and then could be at same hospital affiliation.
According to Charlie Bagli, Lennox Hill Hospital did not have drug rehab programs in 1982, so… 🤷♀️
Absurd questions could be responded with a smile...
Poor Lewin....I have a loud voice, too.
Lewin went on and on about the fact Durst was smiling and was annoyed about it but when Durst asks him to repeat questions, Lewin chuckles! I get that it’s frustrating but get professional and get on with it !… next question! And what about Susan?
Keep watching, court continues on Monday
There are glimpses of the real Durst. He can’t help himself. To repeat back verbatim what a witness said & then claim he didn’t remember key info is absolutely ridiculous
And it just gets more interesting every day. The defense is trying absolutely every trick in the book. Idk if they're trying to set up and appeals case or what.
Every good defense attorney is always setting up an appeal. That's why you make a record w objections, motions, etc.
Clearly they’re making a record for appeal. But, they know that Bob will never live long enough to get through the entire appellate process (many YEARS). They understand perfectly that he’ll never be acquitted. So, their only hope is a mistrial or hung jury, at which time they’d move for medical release, pending the new trial.
@@maryb6672 I’m almost certain that, unfortunately, if he dies while his case is on appeal, his conviction is vacated. So I’m 🤞he holds on.
Levin is tired of the fables coming out of Durst mouth. And him being evasive with his answers.
I’m sure the law/rules Re patient records was very different 40 yrs ago? I know it was here in the UK as I was a nurse training during the 70s and 80s.
The federal regulation the defense referred too was passed in 1975. However, it only pertained to what records could be released to people, other than the patient, requesting copies of the records.
According to Charlie Bagli, Lennox Hill Hospital did not have a drug rehab program in 1982, so the records wouldn’t exist anyway.
Robert is owning the prosecutor .
Hahaha! Are you watching the trial?
@@YourPsychDoc guess you don't understand the old man pauses an when he is asked certain questions he is flipping them back on prosecution in return the prosecution does not have an answer an he is laughing an explaining to the prosecutor he knows they are asking him the same question just in a different way. He knows when to be short an he knows when to push back the man was not a multimillionaire because he was stupid .
@@JohnDoe-mx3vg hahaha! He literally inherited the vast majority of his wealth.
@@JohnDoe-mx3vg This defendant was BORN into his wealth. He abhors work & hasn’t earned a single dime by his intelligence or hard work.
Are you even watching? Durst ain't flipping you a fiver anytime soon. Better crawl on outta there lol
50:42, my my my Durst is flying higher than a kite, starting to see the two evils of Durst.
I thought Lewin was expected to do a great job on cross examination. Durst is playing his like a fiddle. Meanwhile the jury must be asleep. 40 days of trial and millions in taxpayers money and this case is a circus.
I’ve heard the jury cracking up multiple times when Lewin busts him in a giant, ridiculous lie.
This guy is a terrible liar
How does the prosecutor have video between lawyer and client ? I don’t get it.
Criminal Depositions are filmed.
@@YourPsychDoc , with the defense ?
@@elizabethcave7666 Both sides get copies of them.
How do I add a live comment on my desktop? I usually use my phone and it's easier
He testified that she had to repeat some test for school near the end, but I didn’t catch what test.
It was an exam that medical students take at the end of medical school that helps determine where they’ll be accepted for their residency.
Pt can’t tell Dr what to write on his report. Is this report given to pt?
Why does he remind me of Hannibal Lector
This Judge is extremely unprofessional and unethical. He agreed that he also saw Durst smile?? He was sucking up by literally bowing with a prayer sign to Douglas Durst awhile back and now this?
Durst is guilty but it’s a shame to see someone who is supposed to know law behave like this. He is unfairly influencing the jury and knows it. He is also making California look like a bigger joke than it already is. I think the defense should call for a higher court to look into his behavior and to reprimand him.
I do think there's a good reason why John Lewin always gets defensive when his ethics are called into question.
@@RipperTH-camOfficial because he has an impeccable reputation AND nothing he did was unethical? But the defense has repeatedly done unethical things, such as continually trying to introduce evidence that they strategically chose not to admit until it was too late and now regret? And that “evidence” is incredibly flawed and would have been destroyed?
Durst "It's all just legal smeagal"
I can’t stand Levin rocking while speaking to the judge and coming within inches of the defense lawyer.....really...pushy
His voice grates on my nerves. When he seethed and said "your'e like a rat trapped in a cage" the other day is when I almost lost it. So unprofessional.
@@hubbleandtrouble what do you expect? He’s fighting for victims and families’ justice in a court of LA county in California 🙄
@@hubbleandtrouble , I feel sorry for the jury. They can’t leave when they can’t take anymore. They need to start rolling their eyes when anything having to do with the movie comes up. Movie is fantasy,, building fantasy.
@@MV-se1ke , expect professional conduct and relevance. Is that so hard ?
The jury could choose to throw all of this movie talk out as not relevant ....
RD thinks he's a stand up comedian.
This prosecutor has made this so personal that it’s hard to focus on what really happened. If they lose the case it’s his fault solely! He’s an idiot with a short fuse.
Lewin try to use rhetoric tricks but Sir Bob is very very clever & smart and walk home with a smile 😊
It’s sad, but I appreciate him! Considering the state of California… I do not blame him for passionately fighting for the victims and families. Circumstantial evidence is still evidence. There’s a reason Durst wants to be in California 🙄
I agree
Mr Durst I agree.... I agree his line of questioning is RIDICULOUS!!!!!
EXACTLY 💯 mr lewin if someone is going through rehab especially working as a doctor other professionals would need to know about it, files are not private in the medical system, durst is telling Peter pan tales no one should believe that story 😑
The guy crossing examining him acts like he's going to jump up and strangle the guy and he meant it I mean come on get real why is the court even allowing this guy to continue to cross-examine him in that way it's wrong I don't care what he did it's wrong he has rights.. that guy shouldn't even be in a courtroom I don't know where he came from but he shouldn't even be in there he can't control himself he has serious issues.
He’s never once lost a conviction yet. So although he’s annoying at times, he gets results.
@@maryb6672 I don't have a particular issue with Lewin but with the way the trial is being conducted. The judge doesn't seem to have much authority in his court. I guess people are criticising Lewin because the defendant is clearly frail and unwell, although that wasn't always the case.
And in my opinion the cross examiner has anger issues very bad anger issues that man needs help he really does he needs serious mental help
@@moonchild2020I agree. He's like an insolent child.
Can someone tell me, if questions he's asked are being sent to the lap topmin front of him?
Yes so he can read or hear it
@@ML-vj1vk ahh thanks
Constructive criticism: when uploading a video for a new day, start with Part 1 again
No one of the problems for you is you're going to ask you want to bully the guy he wants to say he's got a problem with his hearing good God you know that ain't true he's sitting there bullying this guy like he's got a vindictive personal issue against him his behavior and his actions are wrong
Duper’s grin
I am having trouble with Lewin tone and badgering in his questioning, the judge being so flippant playing to jurors and the live stream.
I would like them to conduct theirselves as if this is trial of a murdered woman ( my opinion 2 women)......all the incessant joking by judge and lewin.
So unprofessional...and yes we have another LA murder trial when the judge doesn’t control his courtroom as Lewin acts in any response like he is the judge.
Lewin acts the way he does because he is not being reigned in by this judge.
According to judge....CA law allows badgering, attorney can ask basically same question over and over and judge says in CA law allows that.
This is nuts and I believe the defense will have grounds for new trial by Lewin and the judge’s missteps.
An attorney is allowed to continue asking the same question over & over until the witness actually answers the question asked. So far, Bob has RARELY answered what he’s been asked.
@@maryb6672 thank you Mary!. It is kinda a crazy law though.
@@taylormitchell1882 Admittedly, sometimes the law is strange.
Just to point out, Lewin is hard of hearing. He has hearing aids in both ears. It’s kind of funny, honestly, when neither of them can quite hear the other.
Humor is a normal, human response. Both sides have made jokes, as has the judge. It’s actually taught in law school as a technique to help the juries not feel overwhelmed by the tragedy and seriousness of a case.
What do you have with the voice of Mr. Lewin. You don't know about prosecutors in dictatorial regimes. Mr. LEWIN IS TOO TOLERANT AS PROSECUTOR! Mr. Durst, sorry Sir... Was claimed to Mr. DeGuerin, immediately. I am convince that Mr DeGuerin is overload of Mr. Durst lies. But, he is the Attorney of Defence.
Kathys BF ended the affair so he could go back to his fiancé! Something could have happened between the two that night!! If Kathy was use to having physical fights with Bob and tried it out w her lover; maybe fat met greasy?
Lol I’ve never heard that expression before.
I honestly think you’re stretching at “kathy’s BF”
I honestly think you’re stretching at “kathy’s BF”
Jill Bidens ex no less
doubtful Durst has slipped up too many times especially saying that when the NY DA reopened the case and asked what they were looking for he said probably body parts - not a body. Given his propensity for bow saws....Too many of Susan's friends were told she was keeping a very serious secret for him
The “goombah” Lewin prosecutor’s behavior is too aggressive and clearly shows disrespect while the judge and defense attorney is attempting to speak . He’s just too cocky for his own good. He acts like a big bully. The judge even had to speak to him about it.
Durst isn’t a bully?
You may not realize it by "goombah" is a derogatory word to Italians. You could just call Lewin an idiot and I would agree.
How bout not saying derogatory terms? That’d be nice 😊
@@Christina4758 I’m fully aware and Italian. Not all Italians are but have encountered many.
@@jeanlynch16 regardless but the professional behavior is what the discussion was about
This prosecutor is terrible
It shouldn't take this long to cross him
Everyone pray for Bobby
Looks like durst last finally growing in his horns. I see on the top left temple area is sprouting his first horn.
This prosecuter is terrible. Long, confusing, horribly worded questions, christ
just saying .'
;how can this old man beat anyone 2 death?
He wasn't old 40 years ago!!
He committed many crimes when he was young and able bodied. Don’t fall for this theatre- Just because you’re old and sick now doesn’t mean you didn’t make hateful, cruel choices in your youth.
🙄.. Catch up eh
This prosecutor is a joke. Supposedly he successfully prosecuted numerous cold cases and was then deemed skillful. All I am seeing is someone who is fumbling through this case, throwing mini tantrums, with repeated unsuccessful attempts to manipulate and change the narrative of what Durst is testifying. All he is doing is insinuating, accusatory, then combative when it doesn't work. If the judge was paying attention and not partial to the prosecutor, he wouldn't be allowed to continue this shameful injustice. He is NOT skilled at all. This makes me question the guilt of any defendant he obtained a conviction for. This judge is also a joke. Shameful
Was this really that big of a deal?
Only of the missing wife never found no justification or justice
Dead neighbor
Dead BFF no justice
His wife is dead, he chopped up his neighbor and most likely killed another woman..yeah it is a huge deal..this man is a monster!!
I meant for the prosecutor. It made him seem like he was overwhelmed about it.
@@jayv4250 he’s not. He’s a highly respected cold case prosecutor who has a 100% success rate. He plays self-deprecating because it allows them to underestimate him, then he destroys them.