When he's caught, he doesn't need to read anything, he can hear quite easily. He also gets angry when he's caught out, all other times he's calm and reads the screen. But my god, he's a bad liar.
And his voice gets loud, clear and strong, amazing isn't it. And when he side eyes the Jury if looks could kill they would be decomposing. I love this, Mr Lewin is masterful.
I have to assume that at this point, Durst knew he was caught and he also knew he didn’t have much time left to live. He might as well have a little fun. He clearly loves the attention and he enjoys toying with Lewin. What difference does it really make if he commits perjury when he has committed murder and is dying of cancer? At least, that is what I imagine he was thinking.
I see from this that he has lost his blinking problem and his attitude has also changed. He's playing a game. Anyone that can cut up a human body can do anything. He killed all 3 in my opinion.
Agreed! And possibly several more. I am particularly wondering about all those that he claimed could testify for him, yet, they are all dead. How did they GET DEAD???
He was clearly on drugs when he was doing that. Coke, meth. People on coke commonly chew their cheeks, and do those sort of things. For example, George Carlin would get mad at himself watching old comedy specials because he could see how high he was. Not saying he isn’t playing games, he’s def putting in a old frail man game here, but those mannerisms from the series were caused by the drugs he was on.
I hope after this 3x serial killer is finally convicted he will finally tell where Kathie is buried. Lewin has won every cold case he’s amazing. This is the last chance to finally convict this evil little monster.
It's like he's questioning someone on the autism spectrum (neurologically different) who does not think and respond in same ways as a neurotypical person.
Something Lewin doesn't realize is a couple hundred thousand dollars for Bob to be giving Susan isn't that much money. When you have a trust with basically unlimited funds, 40 to 50k grand is a drop in the bucket.
From yesterday's testimony it appears is was much more than the 275K. He has admitted to giving her cash that he was withdrawing at less than 10K at a time for more than 600K, and now we know that Susan had access to his Amex Card "where she could buy stuff" and his Amex bill was over 100K in one month.
@@jmj3297 a 100k amount on a card is a lot to some people, while others it's actually not, and Bob actually laughed at the amount. That amount of money could be like 20 bucks to Bob, just depends on his perspective of money.
John Lewin's blatant ableism is beyond disgusting. When this is all over, he needs to take a solid year off and devote it ONLY to learning how to question and engage with Autistic persons. He laughs off straightforward answers. He scoffs when Bob corrects him in his wording. (Wording that he has deliberately changed in questions!) He mis states what Durst just told him in an answer. He completely disregards how Durst understands wording and situations and he flat out doesn't even know that Aspergers IS Autism. (as evidenced by the line of questioning he did a few days ago) He continually asks Bob things like "Would a normal person do ______" or "Is that how you think a person would handle __________________", etc etc. Why the heck would he assume that we (Auties) would know how a "normal person" would do something/everything!? And why would we know how to answer how other random (and non-specific) people out in the world would do something? Also, does he think compound questions are something we can easily answer? How has he NOT picked up on this issue after this many days of this!? Does he not know ANYTHING about the devil in the details of a question? Break it down into a singularity if you want an answer, Lewin! They could have avoided 80% of this wasted time and energy if he would just LEARN how to understand how a neurodivergent brain processes information- both verbal (and worded) exchanges, and then tried to adapt to it when questioning Bob. Lewin encompasses EVERYTHING that is problematic with NTs and their assumptions. Bob may be fully guilty here, but what Lewin is doing should get him booted from this case. This is going to be one heck of an appeal (if Durst doesn't die first.)
@@bestnamesofar4337 Obviously (YOU HAVE NOT BEEN WATCHING THIS WHOLE CASE!!!! ) This judge is a pansy and is letting Lewin be a rude, over barring, smart butt!!!
This DA is indeed a clown... he must think Robert Durst will make him famous but all its proving is he's a bully ! He interrupts the judge regularly he is constantly snickering and making inappropriate comments. His clown car is outside each day to retrieve him.
He's amazing. I see all the maliciously ignorant Durst supporters and my first inclination is to be shocked. Then I remember that even Charlie Manson and Ted Bundy had crazies who supported them, and I feel better.
I'm I awe of how incredibly creative Lewin is.The interrelation with Lewin/Durst is deep, complicated & it's been a long game. I think that when younger, Durst loved this lil cat n mouse he played with him but now in his deteriorating health, not so much. Lewin questions are not the norm & that's what makes him an incredible prosecutor.
Mr Lewin is very derisive about elderly memory loss, etc. It is coming off as cocky, arrogant, smug and plain rude. I don't know if it helps his case. He seems too invested after all the years pursuing him and his wife being a surgeon, etc. I did not have sympathy for RD until this overly aggressive cross examination that got bogged down in minutiae WAY too often!
Statistically impossible for him to be not guilty when 3 people die and Robert Durst is the common person in all 3 lives. How can Robert be so unlucky?
My husband & daughter have Aspergers & if someone was talking crap about them they would cut them off in a heartbeat. Loyalty is VERY important to them both.
I disagree. I'm very tight with money normally but I also don't mind spending more than I would like for a gift. Also, at one time I used to give some money to a friend when they were in need. It just depends on your priorities - what you are willing to spend on and what you are not.
What are you talking about? He overruled almost all of the defense’s objections and appeal-proofed the record, laying the foundation for a clean guilty verdict.
John 8:44 “Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.”
This 100% would get turned over on appeal even if a conviction is secured. This judge is so bad. Durst won't be alive to see his appeal won maybe that's the judges plan.
@@markyh0555 the hypothetical are irrelevant if the defendant rejects the premise, they are irrelevant if there's no evidence to support them, they are irrelevant if they ask the jury question and they are irrelevant if they are more prejudicial than probative in almost every case of hypotheticals they fit into one category or another and the judge continuously is overruling objections
It's about the true facts not hypothetical and what is a good answer for someone to respond..he has the right to a fair trial but they're not doing right by him.. This prosecutor is doing nothing but repeating that he's a liar and a killer and if you repeat it enough then the jurors get it into their heads instead of the facts. You need more than rumors and hearsay to convict someone ..whether he's guilty of not .. Just cuz he thinks he's lying doesn't mean he is.. They're playing dirty
Agreed!!!! Lewin is being allowed to act this way by this clown judge, that he thinks he can say or do as he pleases. And I think he is just to self involved for this trial.
Why are the judge and DA discussing their strategies in front of the defendant? This is giving him a few minutes longer to figure out how to try to mess with the DA.
Right?? Idk why the Defense attorney is even bothering to say.... Objection..... cause all his goofy clown butt can reply with is ......... OVER RULED-- OVER RULED......... Ugh 🤦♀️ which is worse?? The Judge with his clearing of his throat before answering a question..... Or Lewin..... LETS ASSUME MR. DURST........ MY QUESTION WAS MR. DURST....... STRIKE THAT...... My question was MR. Durst.......... Yikes 😱 he is like nails on a chalkboard!!!!!!!
His questions are the biggest run on sentences and they are too long. This is like pulling teeth. He also starts 90% of his questions with would you agree or you would agree. That is just an open door for the answer "no" more than "yes".
Lewin and Durst remind me of the final password round. Lewin Describing an item (fact) and trying to Durst bro guess the word (admit it). Lewin: he mowed your lawn, he discarded the boat you killed your wife in,... Durst: cmmmm Lewin: he was in high school, he was a neighbor... Durst: Barry Weiner!
$ 50,000 = 20% of $275,000 in 2 months =$ 2083 @ month $225,000 = 80% percent of 275,000 divided by 25 years = $750 @ month 178% increase over usual gift of money to Susan and that doesn’t include cash which he has alluded to giving her, and can’t be proved. Big increase.
what is the relevance of the sailboats with phone numbers painted on them please ?. I wish that I didnt get so confused and not understand these questions. !!!!!
So if it gets lost, the person who finds it can call the phone number of the owners. The significance is that there was only one boat - which they wrote their phone number on - and it was sold to Durst neighbor, who still has it. Durst is claiming there were two boats now in order to explain away the Dig Note.
@@lindy2164 No worries. It’s hard to keep up with literally 40 years of evidence. And Durst’s stories are not exactly easy to follow & keep track of-due to the frequency by which they change.
It's hard to understand why Lewin insists on using words other than what durst used so durst uses that word f.ex all about and stall for time or lie. Is the court also intimidated by Lewis success with cold cases to rein him in of his sarcasm?
I would like to ask Mr. Durst if he could say with the hands on the Jewish Bible if he never acted to stop the life of humans and animal, referring those dead persons and that dog. And if he does have regrets for never have his own child.
The Kol Nidre (Aramaic: “All Vows”), in Judaism, is a prayer sung in Jewish synagogues at the beginning of the service on the eve of Yom Kippur (Day of Atonement). The name, derived from the opening words, also designates the melody to which the prayer is traditionally chanted. Controversially, it includes the statement "All vows, obligations, oaths, and anathemas, whether called konam, konas, or by any other name, which we may vow, or swear, or pledge, or whereby we may be bound, from this Day of Atonement until the next (whose happy coming we await), we do repent. May they be deemed absolved, forgiven, annulled, and void, and made of no effect; they shall not bind us nor have power over us. The vows shall not be reckoned vows; the obligations shall not be obligatory; nor the oaths be oaths."[1] Jewish sources state that this refers only to matters between God and man.[1] However, some historians have argued that it has been used to annul oaths forcibly extracted during persecutions, and even that this was its original purpose. During the medieval period, the Kol Nidre was used to question the trustworthiness of all oaths taken by Jews in Christian courts.[2] See also Oath More Judaico. One objection to the Kol Nidre has been that ignorant Jews could misinterpret the prayer as a license for deceit. This may have contributed to many congregations removing or replacing it. Orthodox and Conservative congregations still recite the words
@@tempestnz1 Please, i would like you send all my deepest thanks for your explanations about jewish religion judgment. You lost a lot of your time for writing me all of these. I am confuse now, the judgment is not as i know it. If i put my hands on the Bible, i can't lie. But all politicians put their hands on the Bible. 😄 Tricky issue. May be i was so excited when i have written those words. It is difficult to declare a crime.
@@tempestnz1 If i was a criminal instead Mr. Durst, i never did confess these murders. First of all, they mad me crazy with their stupid asking, in my eyes, they are under my status. I pay miliions than their value. My wife rised the nose too high, that man was naughty and tried to press me with door, and the last, Miss. Suzy was addicted to money for living well and easy. I killed them accidentally, or because some of them just deserved this. Why is my guilt? Why this Court want to testify what i never done? Jury is the milestone. But try to me, i am the victim of murdered, i was unhappy and crocked by these persons. That is!
I think someone else killed her. It's just convenient to blame Durst. She had a lot of financial issues, and sketchy characters in her life according to people close to her. Why...if he was paying her off would she apologize for him having to loan her money due to her financial troubles. The prosecution is using the facts to fit his narrative/ theories, but leaving out important information. He still has no facts that say that he is guilty, just theories and hypotheticals.
I’ll bet he’s the only one of her friends who shortly after her “untimely” death just happened to kill some guy and chop his body into pieces so he wouldn’t be found out as bob durst the one running from a likely murder charge for killing his wife!!!! Betcha anything!
When he's caught, he doesn't need to read anything, he can hear quite easily. He also gets angry when he's caught out, all other times he's calm and reads the screen. But my god, he's a bad liar.
And his voice gets loud, clear and strong, amazing isn't it. And when he side eyes the Jury if looks could kill they would be decomposing. I love this, Mr Lewin is masterful.
Durst is such a liar!!!! He knows he's lying.
@@danyellg3079 He is a sociopath. Plane and simple. 🤷🏼♂️
I have to assume that at this point, Durst knew he was caught and he also knew he didn’t have much time left to live. He might as well have a little fun. He clearly loves the attention and he enjoys toying with Lewin. What difference does it really make if he commits perjury when he has committed murder and is dying of cancer? At least, that is what I imagine he was thinking.
this is unreal im literally in tears cackling “the answer is no no NO NO AND NO”
I see from this that he has lost his blinking problem and his attitude has also changed. He's playing a game. Anyone that can cut up a human body can do anything. He killed all 3 in my opinion.
Astute insightful dead on comment.
Agreed! And possibly several more. I am particularly wondering about all those that he claimed could testify for him, yet, they are all dead. How did they GET DEAD???
"Killed them all, of course" 🤷
He was clearly on drugs when he was doing that. Coke, meth. People on coke commonly chew their cheeks, and do those sort of things. For example, George Carlin would get mad at himself watching old comedy specials because he could see how high he was. Not saying he isn’t playing games, he’s def putting in a old frail man game here, but those mannerisms from the series were caused by the drugs he was on.
I hope after this 3x serial killer is finally convicted he will finally tell where Kathie is buried. Lewin has won every cold case he’s amazing. This is the last chance to finally convict this evil little monster.
Bob gets very angry at Lewin and his voice goes extremely low and he looks at him dead in the face straight on with those creepy eyes!
Right! Like he’s thinking wait till I’m free. You’re next!
@@stevetrivago right!! Hahaha he totally could say that loud and clear
@@zanpsimer7685 Hahaha very true!
"You're prosecuting me, i'm not supposed to prosecute myself"..... ha ha...
He was worth over 100m at the time of his wife’s disappearance if not more.
What he gave to SB is absolutely penny’s in his world
Jeez Lewin has the patience of a saint with Durst, it's like questioning a five year old child !!
The one asking questions is acting like a child and completely unprofessional
It's like he's questioning someone on the autism spectrum (neurologically different) who does not think and respond in same ways as a neurotypical person.
This man is old but he remembers everything he killed her and hide her..he is lying
This is an amazing cross by Lewin! Durst lies repeatedly and gets caught. 👏👏👏
1:33:34 , Was that Bob who called out to the deputy for more water? I maybe mistaken but if that was Durst, his voice sure sounded clear and loud !
Yes! I saw this! He pretends that he has not a clear voice.
He wanted his water open.
“I think it’s your heart racing, not mine” hahaha
Something Lewin doesn't realize is a couple hundred thousand dollars for Bob to be giving Susan isn't that much money. When you have a trust with basically unlimited funds, 40 to 50k grand is a drop in the bucket.
Derp, durst is a tight arse
Actually this is a man who used food stamps and was found as he was stealing a sandwich. He has money to buy the sandwich.
Lewin understands that.
From yesterday's testimony it appears is was much more than the 275K. He has admitted to giving her cash that he was withdrawing at less than 10K at a time for more than 600K, and now we know that Susan had access to his Amex Card "where she could buy stuff" and his Amex bill was over 100K in one month.
@@jmj3297 a 100k amount on a card is a lot to some people, while others it's actually not, and Bob actually laughed at the amount. That amount of money could be like 20 bucks to Bob, just depends on his perspective of money.
John Lewin's blatant ableism is beyond disgusting. When this is all over, he needs to take a solid year off and devote it ONLY to learning how to question and engage with Autistic persons. He laughs off straightforward answers. He scoffs when Bob corrects him in his wording. (Wording that he has deliberately changed in questions!) He mis states what Durst just told him in an answer. He completely disregards how Durst understands wording and situations and he flat out doesn't even know that Aspergers IS Autism. (as evidenced by the line of questioning he did a few days ago)
He continually asks Bob things like "Would a normal person do ______" or "Is that how you think a person would handle __________________", etc etc.
Why the heck would he assume that we (Auties) would know how a "normal person" would do something/everything!? And why would we know how to answer how other random (and non-specific) people out in the world would do something?
Also, does he think compound questions are something we can easily answer? How has he NOT picked up on this issue after this many days of this!? Does he not know ANYTHING about the devil in the details of a question? Break it down into a singularity if you want an answer, Lewin!
They could have avoided 80% of this wasted time and energy if he would just LEARN how to understand how a neurodivergent brain processes information- both verbal (and worded) exchanges, and then tried to adapt to it when questioning Bob.
Lewin encompasses EVERYTHING that is problematic with NTs and their assumptions.
Bob may be fully guilty here, but what Lewin is doing should get him booted from this case. This is going to be one heck of an appeal (if Durst doesn't die first.)
so much yesss here! thank you. 😍
This Mr lewin is incredibly good, he wants justice ⚖ for the deceased people, no matter how many yrs go by murder is murder god bless 🙏 the families
This judge has lost control of this case and council…
The judge has no backbone when it comes to prosecution. Lewin has been so disrespectful since day one.
@@bestnamesofar4337 Obviously (YOU HAVE NOT BEEN WATCHING THIS WHOLE CASE!!!! ) This judge is a pansy and is letting Lewin be a rude, over barring, smart butt!!!
This DA is indeed a clown... he must think Robert Durst will make him famous but all its proving is he's a bully ! He interrupts the judge regularly he is constantly snickering and making inappropriate comments. His clown car is outside each day to retrieve him.
Anyone who criticizes mr lewin doesnt realise that he has never lost a cold case
Mr. Lewin does all efforts for fishing answers from this stubborn man!
He's amazing.
I see all the maliciously ignorant Durst supporters and my first inclination is to be shocked. Then I remember that even Charlie Manson and Ted Bundy had crazies who supported them, and I feel better.
I'm I awe of how incredibly creative Lewin is.The interrelation with Lewin/Durst is deep, complicated & it's been a long game. I think that when younger, Durst loved this lil cat n mouse he played with him but now in his deteriorating health, not so much. Lewin questions are not the norm & that's what makes him an incredible prosecutor.
😂
The judge is letting the prosecutor get away with so much corruption.
Mr Lewin is very derisive about elderly memory loss, etc. It is coming off as cocky, arrogant, smug and plain rude. I don't know if it helps his case. He seems too invested after all the years pursuing him and his wife being a surgeon, etc. I did not have sympathy for RD until this overly aggressive cross examination that got bogged down in minutiae WAY too often!
Couldn't agree more!
Durst doesn't have memory loss. 🙄
I agree and the judge should be moving the trial along more swiftly by not allowing Lewin to marinate in his own minutia!!
Statistically impossible for him to be not guilty when 3 people die and Robert Durst is the common person in all 3 lives. How can Robert be so unlucky?
Jinx 🤷😂
asked and answered......really.....why is this not done?
Durst is trying so hard to discredit Susan Bremen
Just like he tried so hard to discredit Kathy
26:50 dead caught in a lie and Durst gets mad lol
My husband & daughter have Aspergers & if someone was talking crap about them they would cut them off in a heartbeat. Loyalty is VERY important to them both.
His questions need to be literal. Not quips. The specialist would be good as it would also explain the way he responds to the style choice question
Is that prosecutor mental???
I don’t care what you do. 😂😂😂
Lol..I cracked up laughing
@@stevetrivago because you’re a twisted f*ck who likes serial murderers?
A person who is tight with their money generally don’t just “ give it away “…. more like hush money IMO..
I disagree. I'm very tight with money normally but I also don't mind spending more than I would like for a gift. Also, at one time I used to give some money to a friend when they were in need. It just depends on your priorities - what you are willing to spend on and what you are not.
24:43 getting caught in a lie ....(keep watching)
Mr LeWIN slam dunk formula :
I don’t care which aliases Mr Durst had used but one of them is going to prison.
😆😆
The judge is letting entirely too much go.
What are you talking about? He overruled almost all of the defense’s objections and appeal-proofed the record, laying the foundation for a clean guilty verdict.
Go Lewin!!! Give that creature EXACTLY what he deserves!!!
So he dated these 2 bank tellers in 2001, in Galveston, did he date them as Dorothy or Bob? Mr Lewin please enquire.
More to the point, are there any missing bank tellers 🤣
What the crap kinda judge is this? What a joke of a court room.
John 8:44
“Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.”
This 100% would get turned over on appeal even if a conviction is secured. This judge is so bad. Durst won't be alive to see his appeal won maybe that's the judges plan.
What is the judge doing wrong? He's following California law, and it's different than the states the defendants lawyers come. Please explain?
@@markyh0555 the hypothetical are irrelevant if the defendant rejects the premise, they are irrelevant if there's no evidence to support them, they are irrelevant if they ask the jury question and they are irrelevant if they are more prejudicial than probative in almost every case of hypotheticals they fit into one category or another and the judge continuously is overruling objections
It's about the true facts not hypothetical and what is a good answer for someone to respond..he has the right to a fair trial but they're not doing right by him.. This prosecutor is doing nothing but repeating that he's a liar and a killer and if you repeat it enough then the jurors get it into their heads instead of the facts. You need more than rumors and hearsay to convict someone ..whether he's guilty of not .. Just cuz he thinks he's lying doesn't mean he is.. They're playing dirty
Agreed!!!! Lewin is being allowed to act this way by this clown judge, that he thinks he can say or do as he pleases. And I think he is just to self involved for this trial.
The prosecutor should be more precise.
It would save a lot of time.
Why are the judge and DA discussing their strategies in front of the defendant? This is giving him a few minutes longer to figure out how to try to mess with the DA.
I'm all for the specialist
Overruled overruled overruled starting to get really bad now surely these high paid lawyers are rubbing there hands here.
Right?? Idk why the Defense attorney is even bothering to say.... Objection..... cause all his goofy clown butt can reply with is ......... OVER RULED-- OVER RULED......... Ugh 🤦♀️ which is worse?? The Judge with his clearing of his throat before answering a question..... Or Lewin..... LETS ASSUME MR. DURST........ MY QUESTION WAS MR. DURST....... STRIKE THAT...... My question was MR. Durst.......... Yikes 😱 he is like nails on a chalkboard!!!!!!!
@@Redfoxy_94 nails on a chalkboard is probably best expression for what’s going on here brilliant.
@@mtkdon6358 totally agreed it’s just a nightmare that don’t end lol 😂
Surely Bob has appeal the judge is showing far to much bias
Overruled overruled overruled is this man a judge or is he taking sides
Was it Durst's lawyers idea to put him in oversized clothing to make him look more frail to play with the jury because he can walk.
Judge is allowing to much bs to be going on here…prosecutor is being petty and the jurors see this..I hope they find him not guilty
YIKES
he admitted to chopping a man up and you thin he should be aloud to walk free ... idiot
@@davew6686 he was also found not guilty....idiot 🙂
@@carrie2945 Only in Texas would a man be acquitted after shooting a man & dismembering him.
So awesome! Better than fake tv. 🤣👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾
His questions are the biggest run on sentences and they are too long. This is like pulling teeth. He also starts 90% of his questions with would you agree or you would agree. That is just an open door for the answer "no" more than "yes".
Lewin and Durst remind me of the final password round. Lewin Describing an item (fact) and trying to Durst bro guess the word (admit it).
Lewin: he mowed your lawn, he discarded the boat you killed your wife in,...
Durst: cmmmm
Lewin: he was in high school, he was a neighbor...
Durst: Barry Weiner!
GET THE JUDGE OUT OF THERE!!!
$ 50,000 = 20% of $275,000 in 2 months =$ 2083 @ month
$225,000 = 80% percent of 275,000 divided by 25 years = $750 @ month
178% increase over usual gift of money to Susan and that doesn’t include cash which he has alluded to giving her, and can’t be proved. Big increase.
Huh?
@@MissReneeMichelle Durst was paying Susan significantly more money the last two months of her life than he had previously paid her before
Thank goodness there’s some out there that are gifted in math. Well done!
RD is so feisty today, lol
Durst said something to himself at 34:40
Looks like he mouths I'm not lying
God Bless you Mr. lewin!
Lewin is looking for his Perry Mason moment..........but will it happen!?
Exactly what I was thinking 😀
Nope. He needs to move on and let the jury deal with all his lies.
Nope he is losing the plot,there’s a very good chance he’ll have a gun to his own head before the weeks out…
Barbara noose, very telling.
Ok I think he said “I did not say anything” to himself at 34:40
Mr. Lewin, let's Mr. Durst to work! 😊
You couldn't make it up, even if you wanted...
So many times he could've gotten a mistrial n their on the prosecutor's side ALL the way
That comment makes no sense. Prosecution is BRILLIANT. Exposing RD for the lying SERIAL KILLER that he absolutely is.
No, that means you dont have to have any evidence aka ham sandwich lol
Who is making this trial so blasted long? Is it a defense stall tactic?
I think this is going to be a hung jury.
what is the relevance of the sailboats with phone numbers painted on them please ?. I wish that I didnt get so confused and not understand these questions. !!!!!
So if it gets lost, the person who finds it can call the phone number of the owners.
The significance is that there was only one boat - which they wrote their phone number on - and it was sold to Durst neighbor, who still has it. Durst is claiming there were two boats now in order to explain away the Dig Note.
@@MissReneeMichelle ok thanks. I seem to have a lot of difficulty understanding the reasoning of most of these questions....poor me..
@@lindy2164 No worries. It’s hard to keep up with literally 40 years of evidence. And Durst’s stories are not exactly easy to follow & keep track of-due to the frequency by which they change.
It's hard to understand why Lewin insists on using words other than what durst used so durst uses that word f.ex all about and stall for time or lie. Is the court also intimidated by Lewis success with cold cases to rein him in of his sarcasm?
But Hilary makes this guy look like a choir boy.
this prosecutor is just as much of a nut job as the witness on the stand.
RD seems that he could be very nice and charming but also extraordinarily evil!!
The Judge is incompetent.
I would like to ask Mr. Durst if he could say with the hands on the Jewish Bible if he never acted to stop the life of humans and animal, referring those dead persons and that dog. And if he does have regrets for never have his own child.
The Kol Nidre (Aramaic: “All Vows”), in Judaism, is a prayer sung in Jewish synagogues at the beginning of the service on the eve of Yom Kippur (Day of Atonement). The name, derived from the opening words, also designates the melody to which the prayer is traditionally chanted.
Controversially, it includes the statement "All vows, obligations, oaths, and anathemas, whether called konam, konas, or by any other name, which we may vow, or swear, or pledge, or whereby we may be bound, from this Day of Atonement until the next (whose happy coming we await), we do repent. May they be deemed absolved, forgiven, annulled, and void, and made of no effect; they shall not bind us nor have power over us. The vows shall not be reckoned vows; the obligations shall not be obligatory; nor the oaths be oaths."[1]
Jewish sources state that this refers only to matters between God and man.[1]
However, some historians have argued that it has been used to annul oaths forcibly extracted during persecutions, and even that this was its original purpose. During the medieval period, the Kol Nidre was used to question the trustworthiness of all oaths taken by Jews in Christian courts.[2] See also Oath More Judaico.
One objection to the Kol Nidre has been that ignorant Jews could misinterpret the prayer as a license for deceit. This may have contributed to many congregations removing or replacing it. Orthodox and Conservative congregations still recite the words
@@tempestnz1 Please, i would like you send all my deepest thanks for your explanations about jewish religion judgment. You lost a lot of your time for writing me all of these. I am confuse now, the judgment is not as i know it. If i put my hands on the Bible, i can't lie. But all politicians put their hands on the Bible. 😄
Tricky issue. May be i was so excited when i have written those words. It is difficult to declare a crime.
@@tempestnz1 If i was a criminal instead Mr. Durst, i never did confess these murders. First of all, they mad me crazy with their stupid asking, in my eyes, they are under my status. I pay miliions than their value. My wife rised the nose too high, that man was naughty and tried to press me with door, and the last, Miss. Suzy was addicted to money for living well and easy. I killed them accidentally, or because some of them just deserved this. Why is my guilt? Why this Court want to testify what i never done? Jury is the milestone. But try to me, i am the victim of murdered, i was unhappy and crocked by these persons. That is!
I think someone else killed her. It's just convenient to blame Durst. She had a lot of financial issues, and sketchy characters in her life according to people close to her. Why...if he was paying her off would she apologize for him having to loan her money due to her financial troubles. The prosecution is using the facts to fit his narrative/ theories, but leaving out important information. He still has no facts that say that he is guilty, just theories and hypotheticals.
I’ll bet he’s the only one of her friends who shortly after her “untimely” death just happened to kill some guy and chop his body into pieces so he wouldn’t be found out as bob durst the one running from a likely murder charge for killing his wife!!!! Betcha anything!
Lewin has all the charm of a rattlesnake!!
i’m sorry, I can’t stand John Lewin. No professionalism.
Can anyone make out what durst says under his breath at 1:27:40. “Caught”???
can't make it out...sounds like Darth Vader
@@jmj3297 ha ha
Creepy
Lewens being played more than an old fiddle right now old Bob is outsmarting him left right n centre even the judge is helping lewen but still no good
Christ, he's as bad as Hilary Clinton.