CA v. Robert Durst Murder Trial Day 35 -Video Testimony of Nick Chavin - Durst's Friend
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 ต.ค. 2024
- With the release of The Jinx Part 2 let's take a look back at the Robert Durst Trial. LIVE TRIAL: CA v. Robert Durst Murder Trial - Murder of Friend Susan Berman
Witnesses:
Continued Testimony of Lisa DePaulo - Writer
Direct Exam of Spc Agt Eric Perry - FBI
Robert Durst Discusses Film "All Good Things" With Andrew Jarecki
Excerpts From HBO Series "The Jinx" Played During Trial
Robert Durst stands trial for the 2000 murder of friend Susan Berman. The trial began just before the pandemic in early 2020 and was halted two weeks in. The restart happened on May 17, 2021, with the same jury panel.
The defendant’s wife Kathleen McCormack Durst went missing in 1982. Evidence and testimony would show that Robert Durst killed her, the prosecutor said. The defendant allegedly told Berman it was an accident and asked her for help. She served as his alibi.
Berman, 55, was shot execution-style at her Beverly Hills home in 2000, and the prosecution suggested that it was because of what she knew about Kathleen’s death and disappearance. As defense lawyer Dick DeGuerin would have it, however, Durst is innocent. His client only came across the body, panicked, and fled, he maintained.
#RobertDurst #RobertDurstTrial
Law&Crime Network is Now on TH-camTV! Find the Addon at
tv.youtube.com...
You may already have access to the Law&Crime Network! Find out here: lawandcrime.co...
No access? That’s okay! Subscribe direct to Law&Crime here: lawandcrime.co...
Watch Us Live On Peacock Daily Free: www.peacocktv....
Click on Channels & Scroll Down to Law & Crime Network
Durst was last arrested with directions to his x-wife's best friend, Gilberte Najame's house, who consoled her after Durst smashed her face and she was at the ER & planning a strategy to leave. This witness was probably also on Dursts hit list.
This has to be the longest trial known to man.
Yes it only took 9 months to convict 15 nazis and hang them in nurnenburg
No the longest court case ever lasted nearly 60 years.
because durst is rich ,..that is why
@@ezeddiev that was the longest-running lawsuit. they weren't at trial all that time
@@margomalik181 ....and a big fat liar. So trying to work out fact from fiction isnt easy.
Responsible for two deaths because he didn’t speak up. He didn’t even have a good reason why! Durst was already done with him. He’s lucky Durst didn’t knock him off too.
Susan Berman paid the price for protecting Durst ...She knew he killed Kathy and helped him. Really dont feels sorry for her. His other friends are horrid
That friend had information and he said nothing I wonder how he would feel if it was Daugther that he got kill
He’s gonna rot for it too
This guy is funny
Susan B sounds absolutely unpleasant to hang out
W may she RIP
How many of you out there who, like this guy or Laraine Newman, that have first hand knowledge of admissions of guilt of murder - be it second-hand thru a close or best friend - would willingly keep quiet and withhold that info from police for years and years? I'm really curious!
Absolutley. You have to wonder about the character of someone who says Durst - a serial killer - was his best friend.
The level of apathy and inaction is scary
money buys friends. PUre and simple. Durst is a psychopath
anyone that can be bought for money isn't a 'friend'.
What are the two words Durst's second wife said? I cannot make out what Chavin is saying.
It’s maudlin.
At least he's a more normal witness as a Durst friend than Oliver and Giordano, etc.
He internal foh
He’s complicit foh
I am shocked at all the hear say evidence being given in this testimony. It has been my impression over the years that it was not admissible because memory is not perfect. Seems they are breaking a lot of rules of evidence in this case.
I think it is different if the person is dead. There was a new law passed several years ago allowing hearsay if the person is deceased.
It depends on the case and what kind of testimony given etc. sometimes hearsay is allowed
If a prosecution witness testifies that the defendant personally confessed to him, that's not hearsay. It falls under "party admission" in the Rules of Evidence. If Chavin's testimony were "I know a guy who told me that Durst confessed," then that would be hearsay.
I love James Lipton.
Hahaha
Thank you! It was killing me trying to figure out who he looks like!
It sounds like Susan was Aspergers?
Durst was diagnosed as Schizophrenia as a youth, but Aspergers much later in life. Perhaps that's why they hit it off?
Was debunked in pros, rebutal