What Did Queen Mary Gift Her Daughters-in-Law and How Were Their Relationships?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 มิ.ย. 2024
- Hey everyone, welcome back to my channel! Here you will discover many exciting videos that will reveal to you the history of royal jewelry, information about their owners, their significance and much more! Subscribe to the channel so you don't miss anything interesting!
/ @jewelryjourneys-lq1jl
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 68 | คู่เอก "พระจันทร์ฉาย vs โจนาธาน"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/F3IM3w-XchI/mqdefault.jpg)
I thought I was the only person who found stuff like this interesting
Yes, because _nobody_ loves fine jewelry, lol!
There’s a lot of us around!!
@@vivs3189 I think I’m turning into old lady
@@voraciousreader3341 yeah really not the point
I've been in love with the crown jewels since a child. AREN'T they fabulous ❤?@jessejacobs9856
I am fascinated that the men in the royal family take an interest in designing jewelry for their women.
I Know and they have a good eye. The jewelry looks magnificent on them. Like it’s Tailored to them in a sense.
Prince Phillip had a great eye for jewels and design 💜
Literally, what else do they have to do?
There is a strong artistic streak running through that family. Both Victoria and Albert were artistic and passed it on. Both Prince Philip and King Charles were/are excellent painters.
@@barbraseville8984 too right. After meeting Wallis Simpson, the Duke of Windsor focussed his entire life on buying her affection. There was no flair, artistry or imagination involved in his choice of jewellery for her. I have no doubt that she told him what she wanted and he bought it for her with money he had conned out of British people through lying to his brother George VI or pimped off his rich friends. He was lazy and stupid. Apparently, his brother Prince George was just as bad. In spite of all those rocks he created a living hell for his wife with his shenanigans. He was also believed to be a German spy. Windsor was a Nazi sympathiser and so was Wallis. He said that Hitler should bomb the hell out of London on the promise that she would be made queen and presumably have all the royal jewellery to herself. This was an informative piece but the politics and characteristics of those involved is also interesting and would make the rest of us feel less like wide eyed plebs.
Queen Mary is the reason the royals have the marvelous jewels they have now.
Its a pity that you didnt have coloured photos of the jewels....good video 😍🇬🇧
Extremely interesting and exciting video. Will be watching more.
Loved it thank you, more please.❤😊
Stunning jewelry! Enjoyed the history
Fantastic. I like the way you present. Thanks for sharing.
❤ beautiful elegance ❤ thank you, I really enjoy these fabulous fashions of years past. We don't see many displays of family sharing and traditional hand-me-down treasures ❤
Wallis wanted to leave Edward ( uncle David ) he wouldn’t accept it ,
Her diary’s make extremely extraordinary reading
Lady Sarah Chatto, styled as a daughter of the first Earl of Snowdon, takes her surname from her husband, Mr Daniel Chatto. Snowdon - the earldom of which is now the title of her brother, has never formed part of her name, which was Lady Sarah Armstrong-Jones prior to her marriage - Armstrong-Jones being her father's surname. Neither is she "of Snowdon," in the way that Prince Andrew's daughters were "of York," prior to their marriages, nor "of Sussex," in the way that Prince Harry's children now are or indeed, Lady Louise Windsor would now be "of Edinburgh," of she chose to use her princely style and titual dignity of HRH.
you're right about everything else except about Lady Louise, our late Queen put a note in Letters Patent and it was agreed in 1999 that any children of Edward and Sophie's would not have royal styles and titles and would have the courtesy titles
as sons and daughters of an Earl (now a Duke)
and theres been no such thing as being able to choose to use a royal title later
if she had a royal title it would have been hers and also james from birth
the press didn't like it at the time
James Pope Hennessey's official biography of Queen Mary is wonderful, and this program is remarkably accurate. QM really put the royal family on good footing . She was a surprisingly excellent and intelligent Queen. She and King George V were a good couple who loved each other very much.
I am fascinated the royal jewelry collections!
Blood stones
@@doublerainbow8169jealousy is such an unbecoming trait ....
It's shame we can't see these in colour.
Excellant and informing video. It would be great if there were more close up shots of the jewels.
Lady Sarah Chatto was Lady Sarah Armstrong- Jones before marriage, "Snowdon" has never been a part of her name despite her father's title
It's such great fun to correct others, isn't it.??
@@watthaile2053 It wouldnt need to be done if people did their research correctly, Fun has nothing to do with it. People should be happy to be corrected, There is no shame in making a mistake but there is shame in arrogantly resisting facts and spreading lies in their place
Enjoyable, as always. Thank you.
Very well done and wonderful photos. One thing: it is not correct that Queen Mary a the Duke of Windsor communicated only twice after the Abdication. They wrote to each other very regularly.
This was a very excellent post! I had never heard that Queen Mary had given any jewels to Wallis Simpson. Queen Mary was so proper that I've no doubt she felt it was her duty to send a gift, even though she sent it indirectly. Ostensibly, she gifted the necklace to her son, but both of them knew it was meant for Wallis. I was wondering about the Kent festoon tiara that Princess Michael wears and which I thought was also a gift from Queen Mary, but you didn't mention it. Maybe it was given to Princess Marina later on during her marriage and not at the wedding? I don't think that was the tiara given to her by the City of London because I thought that was a fringe tiara and the one I'm thinking about its more of a festoon.
Yes, you are right. The Fringe Tiara was given as a wedding gift from the City of London. However, the origin of the Kent Festoon Tiara is shrouded in mystery. It does not appear to have been a wedding gift. I also could not find any information suggesting that it was a gift from Queen Mary. There is speculation that it might have been a gift from the Duke, but it is unknown exactly when the tiara was given. As far as I have been able to find, the Tiara first appeared at the 1953 Coronation of Queen Elizabeth II.
@@JewelryJourneys-lq1jl Could she have borrowed it from her mother, GD Elena Vladimirovna, for the coronation and then later on inherited it? I don't think Prince George ever had enough money to gift his bride such a tiara, plus it'd be strange for her not to wear it during his lifetime. They were very active social butterflies! Then, after his early death, Princess Marina didn't have any money. She pretty much depended on the largesse of the monarch, so I doubt she could have bought it. What do you think?
Queen Mary left that little necklace to Edward/Wallis in her will, so the Duchess started wearing it after 1953. Considering the priceless jewelry in huge diamonds, rubies, emeralds, etc. which Queen Mary left to her other daughters-in-law and granddaughters, this necklace was a trifle. But, without a doubt, it was a gesture.
@@mercedesscholl5551What became of that pearl necklace?
Absolutely fascinating...... I have now subscribed to your channel.
Fascinating saga
Rift? The BRF were pretty much united in their distaste for Wallis. Why? George V and Mary had discreet inquiries made on Wallis's background, especially her sojourn in China as a "hostess" in a brthl. PLEASE read King of Fools. PLEASE.
Thanks again ❤😊
Excellent !!!!😊🇬🇧
I am pretty sure that in Queen Mary’s day, the women didn’t own the jewels. They were given to the men to be inherited by their eldest son, and on through the generations.
Not the wedding gifts. And I think it was QM that established the royal trust collection that passes from monarch to monarch so they won’t be subject to inheritance taxes. Not everything falls into the trust but the bulk of it does.
Love this.
Nice.
Duke of Windsor left with a pocket full of gems to ensure Wallis would have jewels made just in her taste, it was a something that was made the Queen Mother mad….
Wow! What a beautiful piece of history! Thank you for this video!
I wonder what pieces of jewellery the late Queen Elizabeth left her female family members. Of course all the major pieces and sets go to King Charles but I feel sure she would have left small pieces of her personal jewellery to Anne, Sophie , Sarah and her granddaughters Zara, Beatrice, Eugenie and Louise. Probably also the great granddaughters and her niece Sarah Chatto. Anne received some lovely pieces during her mother's lifetime and the late Queen gave pearl and diamond earrings to several family members, including Meghan. I don't suppose we will ever know.
I know catherine got her Japanese pearl choker!
@@Arielsfork Nice.
i LOVE 💘THE REAL JEWELERY💍THiS iS WHAT i WOULD LOVE 💘 TO GiVE MY DAUGHTER'S iN LAW TOO THE REAL THiNG ONLY.
Maria Feordovna passed away in 1928
The Duke of windsor and queen mary wrote constantly! And the pearls were a wedding gift, queen mary was much too correct etiquette wise so she simply couldnt just not send a gift, it was a kindness they didnt deserve from her.
Hello, do you have a reference please for Queen Elizabeth's quote re: Queen Marys death? Thank you!
❤Яяяяя Веллллл Фемели Ангел и эти дети Сиси 😊 Виктория стала кресн
ай мамой т всё что произошло ана всех убрала и миня поставила так что не мучайтесь
What happened to Wallis' pearl necklace?
Probably auctioned off with the rest of her jewels.
And Royal Germs have Camilla and Charles two deplorable at the helm of this grotesque family - Diana RIP
Greek translations plss
I would have thought Wallis would be fortunate not to have received a pipe bomb in the mail.
Pas le droit de marqué vos titres en français
Marina Duchess of Kent was praised for her exceptional elegance and beauty, but I think her sister in law Alice Duchess of Gloucester was much more attractive. Yes I’m that superficial.
No.TO. MM. I mean Wally! 😅
Excuse me, in historical writings the king to be who abdicated was considered a weakling by his parents. They deemed him unfit long before he met Simpson and long before his father died. The mother said she wished that her second son would take the throne, but he was the second son and that was wishful thinking on her part. Little did she know that her wish would become reality. These narrators are always trying to make Simpson the reason he abdicated, it was the easiest way out for him and if he hadn’t Hitler, Phillip and Mountbatten would have taken the United Kingdom to hell in a basket.
Bit sharp in the last paragraph…..wonder who sent you back in time …
He was also said to be sterile, which is why they were afraid he would marry and Wallis would try to fake a pregnancy.
Twiggy Twang ... Would that be with or out the hand.??
@@lemondropkid6175 He had caught either mumps or measles? as a child that’s why not only sterilise but his growth was effected
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Modern day Wallis Simpson, Meghan Markle 😂
True !!!!😊
Wallis Simpson never pulled the crap that nutmeg is doing
I would put Wallis Simpson above Meg Markle any day,in every way.
Methane holds on tight to the royal title she got from the rf despite accusing them of many things together with her traitor husband and mother.
A hole
Duchess of Gloucesters dress was much better than qe the qm
Legal form of tax evasion?
We are not talking small change here.
You criticize them because you are not in their shoes. I'm not saying they are to be or not to be supported, but no one knows what the likes of you would have done if you were born to that privilege.
Why is Camilla wearing jewellery Diana should be wearing 😡