I mean all countries in the world would use all means available to their disposal to protect their country and integrity 🤷♂️. Russia has that right too as a country. What is the deal with double standards and hypocrisy?
I think this channel is auto generated by a Russian AI. Alarmist clickbait nothing burgers. The best description for this channel. It's like they want to be fair like a socialist communist. Equality of outcome but inequality of facts. 50 / 50reporting of Ukraine and Russian successes which means they have to underreport Ukraine's success and over report Russia's han
In Afghanistan the Western coalition has never talked about secret weapons, yet the war has not gone well there either. After twenty years of war and billions of dollars spent in vain, the world's No. 1 army, the super-technological US army, has fled Kabul in the face of a gang of ragtag Taliban armed only with AK47s and a few pickup trucks with machine guns. There is no word in the vocabulary to describe such a humiliating defeat. At least the Russians are fighting a real army largely supported by the major Western powers.
@@trumpforever6706 Lol low IQ Child after 9 Years and more losses then USA and allies in 20 years Russia ran from the same Sandal wearing farmers. Oh and never controlled nearly as much territory. USA and allies never lost a single battle in Afghanistan. not one. Taliban would run off then come back and fight another day.
@@trumpforever6706 An AGREEMENT to Govern Afghanistan between the Talaban and US was sign in Doha Qatar on 02/29/2020, the Afghanistan women will surely appreciate 🙏 your support youknow.
I've seen this too, many times in hollywood films. Like how they can locate a person no matter where you are. Unfortunately, the reality is, it took 20 years to find Bin Laden
@dedel6954 it took 10 years, not 20. It also doesn't matter because the fish ate him. The other scumbag turned into shredded pork from a drone. You can run, and you can hide, but no matter how long it takes, we will find you and take you out.
@@Navybrat64 yeah, killing one guy does not stop them from getting another person in place. So 9/11 season 2 coming soon to a skyscraper near you. And then find rhat guy who masterminded it for another 10 years LOL
The IRA did this in London with powerful homemade bombs. One was planted in the Brighton hotel weeks in advance of Mrs Thatchers party conference. I dunno how they pulled that off. How did he book a room that happened to be above Thatcher's bedroom. A huge chimney fell on her bed but the bitcz was up late 3am finishing off her speech. They had about 20 or more bombs planted at various hotels but the British police got lucky and caught the unit and one of them had a note in his back pocket with time and locations of all the bombs.
@@briantitchener4829 she wasn't the only murderer that night to get a brain injury and Alzheimer's. Not sure if the other guy was a war criminal also but she was a brave woman or maybe more stupid than a "Paddy" no not racist and he may have been an empathetic loyalist prior to thatchers strong woman stance 💪🏻. At least she got nappies although she was in a hell only an Alzheimer's patient experiences so it didn't matter I suppose. Still I hope karma is real and Putin gets pulled through the streets of Kyiv like the black and tans used to do to any of those stupid Paddy's that they caught. You should look up what they did to those they caught at crossbarry. Terrible 💔 . Stupid but brave but shur how could 100 farmer/IRA men with a months training (done with hockey sticks ) we call em hurleys , out fight 1,200 British ww1 soldiers in armoured cars at 2 AM. RIP lads 😢. ✌🏻 Churchill made our war poem famous tho by plagiarism against nazis. A Paddy poem. Thought that was written by intelligent people . Saved us from the Vikings too. Oh wait. No we showed them how that was done. Famine was our weak spot .....and empathy first until we started getting some American president's that escaped and washed up on American shores with a few survivers. Great history. Hats off to the Englishman who made ",the wind that shakes the barley" Unfortunately telling the truth earned him some bad reviews from even the self loathing gaurdian who stated " how much does.....he... (sorry for the bias) hate his own Country? Lmao
Uranium materials they're talking about require recharging but that's not what's used in modern portable atomic demolition charges they don't require recharging because they don't use uranium they use plutonium and cobalt nuclear materials I know because I went through a lot of hazmat training
I once remember the number reported missing at the end of the Cold War was between 5 -11 missing suitcase bombs,; that s worrying enough, but 80+ is staggering.
Petr Cibulka in 2005: “I am convinced that Russian military intelligence (GRU) is directing terrorist activities against the United States and the West. This is Moscow’s main option for defeating the West. Therefore the GRU is supplying the Islamic terrorists with Russian nuclear weapons so the planned attack against the United States by Russia, China and their allies can follow.”
Quite literally, a tactical nuclear detonation can be delivered from artillery shells. As far as I have read, two man portable in terms of "suitcase" is about as small as anyone has or maintains. Smaller are possible and have been made, but it's not practical nor very effective bc the real power would likely be something much more powerful.
Now they can just put the warhead on a cruise missile type of platform. I was in a field artillery unit it would of been awesome to fire atomic Annie or nukes cannon even if it shortened life by a few years
@@georgewbushcenterforintell147 ------ > It wouldn't shortne life by "a few years". No one would survive a nuclear war. Whoever didn't die in the initial blasts would die of the nuclear fallout. The half-life of nuclear fallout from plutonium is said to be 250 thousand years. We're already facing problems with the utilization of nuclear energy. EPA Facts about Plutonium semspub.epa.gov/work/HQ/176324.pdf
@@jannmutube also the EMP would destroy all electronics that are not shielded. Study by the US government said 90% of the population would be dead within a year without power .
This is correct. However you're missing the big picture. Don't patronize western military too much. If the inevitable happens and nukes were to fly back and forth across the globe, Russia will not be going down without taking anyone else with them. The UK is just a speck and will be gone, other western nations that are big enough will have their citizens end up as refugess in another country as their own country will become uninhabitable for decades.
I don't think they are missing or at least stolen, if so they would have used at least a couple by now. That is not to say that Russia still may have them at its embassy compounds around the world but if this were to happen, Russia would be no more!
@@frankrenda2519 Another empty threat by a military that has had trouble tying their boots on so far. Frank try it just try it and you will unleash a whirlwind on the Orcs, A piece of advise don't be anywhere in the proximity of your Reptile Putin!
@@armanicharles5336 We in the west does not care if Russia has 90% of the Nukes. NATO will never allow those genocidal psychopaths in your beloved totalitarian country or that reptilian Putin to get anything close to a win in Ukraine!
@@uncuttcoffeeofficial yeah you suck d*cks that's right. You're all dumb and lazy, wants a desk job with a high paying income but does not fair well in education. The only thing you're champions at are your LGBTQ communities, drugs and abortions.
@@dedel6954you sound like heartbroken overweight middle school cheerleader that never made it on the team. What do you want me to do argue with you online with mighty words. Lol
@@uncuttcoffeeofficial i don't expect you to, i know the capacity of your comprehension and "mighty" is not something you all can be described with. LMFAO
Saw my first "suitcase" Nuke about 30 years ago at an Air Force Base in New Mexico, in a facility open to the public, yes, it was about the size and shape of a regular suitcase, but of course there was NO REAL BOMB inside of it!
I lived through the cold war days,when we had nuclear drills where we were all trained to hide under our tiny desks. And if there is one thing I learned from it, it was that my OWN goverment was in on the fear mongering, and used it to manipulate us all. THEY KNEW that desk wasnt going to save me, yet they insisted on terrorizing 3rd graders with nukes. Given the fact that my own government would bullshit us all like that, why would anyone be surprized that our worst enemy would make up stories about having nukes buried in US cities? Even if they had, I wouldn't have been nearly as pissed at our enemy for doing that as I was at my own government years later, for sending all us terrorized 3rd graders diving under our desks once a month *Just for the FUN of it?
I’m sure both sides have these, and both sides have deployed them. It still makes no sense to do so, even these would lead to Mutually Assured Destruction.
Ukraine isn’t fielding a Warsaw Pact/NATO sized force or has anything that, if wiped out by such a strike, would turn the tide of the war. Considering the order of battle, Ukraine might lose a few hundred soldiers (and civilians), but the fallout from this ground burst would be floating over not only their own troops, but their own country. What would be worth even such a small nuke detonation when the IMMENSE cost that would be exacted against Russia, from even their erstwhile “allies”, following such a strike, which would certainly FAR outweigh any benefits? No, Putin may be an ass, but he’s not suicidal. And even if he was, those in the military that control the missiles, and the FSB that control the warheads certainly aren’t. Especially when there is no existential threat from Ukraine.
@@briant5685 Good luck with that! For having the supposed “second most powerful military” Ukraine has been handing you your ass “conventionally”. How many months has it been now since your military has actually gained ground rather than losing it day after day? How many of your troops, treasure, and all that equipment wasted? And now having to go hat-in-hand to N. Korea, China, Iran, and India. 😂 But I understand having to play with your nukes in public in a sad attempt to salvage at least a little pride, because in every other respect it must be so embarrassing, so humiliating, to be a Russian nationalist these days. 🤣
@@sequenceofficial6141 If you think about it, he has likely planted these nukes in his embassies and other establishments in virtually every city in the western world. If the worst happened and with megolmaniacs like Putin it could, the whole world would be laid to waist, including Ukraine. I don't know if you have heard of the diplomatic bag. This is a centuries old system, where foreign nations can import goods into another country which goes straight to their embassy without being examined by customs or anyone else. It does not have to be a bag. It can be a large box or even a container. So it doesn't have to be a suitcase bomb. It could be far larger.
@@jinnbuster4753 Maybe some countries are naive and not well-equipped. But Putin definitely not planting anything in a USA embassy like that, things can happen but imagine the contingencies America has ready for Russia? Remember we have so much bases and influences in and around Russia if we wanted to start war pre-empitively we would decimate Russia quickly.
@@u-turnnewslive Well if we were talking about some third world country, Putin is not likely to waste his nukes on them, as they pose no threat to him. I am referring to the countries of the western world, most notably Europe , the USA, Australia and a few other countries. Around the world Russia has 147 embassies and a similar number of consulates, all with diplomatic immunity. There are also unknown numbers of "illegal" agents in most western countries. These people often pose as normal citizens leading quiet lives to avoid attention. We know this is true because our secret services do find them from time to time. I am not suggesting all of these are sitting on suitcase nukes, but the possibility is there. I can only speak for my own country, the UK. I do not think we have sited such devices in Russia. It is not the sort of things we do. However Russia has a long track record of carrying out "wet jobs" and this is typical behaviour for them. Britain has a clearly announced nuclear deterrent which could deliver between 40 and 80 nuclear weapons to the western part of Russia in the event of an attack on the UK. I say western Russia because that is where the vast majority of their population reside.
@@jinnbuster4753 your making stuff up. Ukraine is a racist country and usa should stop wasting millions of dollar on weapons. We should spend that money on ourself to build better medical schools or fund stem education or use it to build a new technology
Tidbits for the curious * Thaddeus Taylor - Gifted fission bomb designer, said to have even sketched out the design of a new bomb on the back of an envelope. Designed the most efficient fission bomb, the largest fission bomb, the smallest fission bomb, (25 lb but may have/ may not have been built. Promoted thorium powered reactors to reduce the threat of nuclear terrorists. * Front Line (PBS investigative reporting) - "Russian Roulette." Feb-99. Excellent, maybe more pertinent now than in 1999. This may have discussed-- In the 90s, a nuclear storage facility of highly enriched uranium east of Yakaterinburg was essentially unattended. Western news sources investigated, (Russia was relatively open to outsiders at that time), and found rogue elements had likely stolen hundreds of pounds of weapons grade uranium. (Pakistan exploded its first atomic bomb, 1998. Coincidence?)
In all cities in US they have nuclear detection systems that are so sensitive they detect a nuclear watch worn by a person. (If) a suitcase nuke was used on US soil a full nuclear retaliatory strike would occur.
@@xxmobstrxx8535 It's not true: the real surprise is that Russia would win the conflict on points, because a poor nation of only 145 million inhabitants would take the satisfaction of annihilating the much richer USA (330 million inhabitants), the whole of Europe (750 million) and all other allies, including Ukraine (40 million). Trump had warned of the danger: th-cam.com/video/71kvy99SV8w/w-d-xo.html If it happens it will not be Trump's fault, but someone else's.
not really... its BS here is my comment '' if Putin makes the mistake of using the nukes then the West will have no choice but to send all possible weapons to Ukraine which will cause the defeat to Russia. We can't give in to nuclear blackmail once... otherwise all countries possessing this weapon will do the same to get what they want!''
The US was working on a longer life power cell that would last for 4 years, but that is still a short time if one has to go and recharge or swop out the cell.
Well that actually would be very hard to get in to the USA whoever is tasked to bring it in would give themselves out immediately nobody uses suitcases anymore unless the smuggler is a 75year old who doesn't know how to use a smart phone and even that rare now.
While that is true, you made it sound like no developed countries ever having such social gap. Or maybe I'm just being prejudiced after consuming a half full liquor.
Just a thing but the US government flys special helicopters over the United States that can detect things like a suitcase nuke . You can see the flights of these helicopters on any app that tracks air traffic .
Ssssh you'll interrupt Crux creating panic. Just like if you point out, that if this happened Russia would end a few days later, so it'll never happen.
" The public may see a twin-engine Bell 412 helicopter, which is equipped with radiation sensing technology and operated by NEST’s Aerial Measuring System based at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland. The helicopter will fly in a grid pattern over the areas at 200 feet (or higher) above the ground at a speed of approximately 80 mph."
The backpack nukes the Soviet Union used to have Putin said he had some stashed in America well if he did like any battery that you ever had the pit would have corroded and it would no longer work does he still have backpack nukes only if they've remanufactured the pit that is in them because they corrode and break down and have a limited shelf life
@@zhoubaidinh403 there's not a battery to maintain the pit the pit like a battery corrodes and then it's no longer round and then it doesn't work because it's not the right shape
the atomic bomb " gun barrel " design is just a tube with uranium at both ends then a explosive charge fires the uranium bullets at each other . the impact and heat cause a atomic detonation ... these can be made small enough to fit in a howitzer shell .and uranium last a long time no need to re-fuel . so atomic briefcase might be more accurate ..[ look up " little boy and fat man " ]
𝗢𝗳 𝗣𝗼𝗽𝗲 𝗙𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗶𝘀, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗼𝗳 𝗪𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝗪𝗮𝗿 𝗜𝗜𝗜 Last week, a conversation with Pope Francis was published, in which he related to the Russia-Ukraine war as the start of World War III. In a conversation with the editors of European Jesuit publications, and which was first published by the Italian Jesuit publication La Civiltà Cattolica, the Pope said, “The world is at war. For me, today, World War III has been declared.” Subsequently, he lamented, “What is happening to humanity that we have had three world wars in a century?” I do not believe that the Russia-Ukraine conflict is a third world war or that it should devolve into one. However, the fact that there is such a danger, or that there is war at all, shows that we have not drawn the right conclusions, which puts us in harm’s way again. It is clear to everyone that no one has anything to gain if the war in Ukraine escalates into a global conflict. That said, the war is yet another indication that we still do not know how to govern our desire for dominance and control. We have come to a point where our ego does not settle for controlling others. Nowadays, people are willing to destroy others for simply behaving or even thinking differently from them. If we want to prevent wars, we need to help all the nations realize that war does not bring any benefits, that we do not want it and do not need it. This is a process that must involve everyone, since each country must have its neighbors going through the same process, or belligerent countries will exploit other countries’ efforts to end violence. If countries do not adopt this approach, they will continue to compete against each other, exploit each other and deplete the earth of resources. We are already seeing the consequences of this attitude on our planet, but they will grow far worse in the very near future. Hunger, extreme heat, extreme cold, and countless other problems will overwhelm humanity and force nations to stop abusing others and focus on their own survival. To prevent this scenario from developing further than it already has, humanity needs to understand that we must learn to work together or nature will destroy us. Currently, many nations are still dreaming of conquests and subjugations of other nations. We must gradually make these nations understand that doing so will only harm them, and harm everyone else, as well. Unless we help everyone realize that we are dependent on each other for better or worse, and we must act accordingly, we will all be in big trouble.
Having to maintain these things for thirty years for whatever plan people had for them without any detection of them or showing up anywhere in all this time makes the whole story seem like bullshit.
worrisome news! The report should have been dedicated to bots who comment shamelessly that Putin's nukes won't explode. "Generations to come with scarce belief that such a man ( sorry, modern-day bots) as this (these),in flesh and blood, walked upon this Earth"
They put them in the mountains around the places they deem threats completely incased in cultured geopolymer with high mineral content witch is immune to x-rays and radiation detectors there would only be a USB hole in the side of a mountain of not connected to a underground electrical scource or wires
This all stems from a guy who was voted “Top 20 Most Corrupt Members of Congress,” was known for his theatrics, and made his entire political career by pointing out “bad guys,” from local motorcycle gangs to foreign intelligence officers. He enjoyed the spotlight and making headlines, but wasn’t exactly credible.
Crux we have been asking you to give us report on kremina,we need to know what happened to the Ukrainian troops that entered kremina few days ago,🤣🤣🤣🤣 Everybody needs to know
Russia not the only one to have suitcase nukes..u.s.has them too..able to take out six square city blocks..or about sixty thousand people..and as i said before...can be built in a simple machine shop..anyone else read mechanics illustrated in the 70s...or am i the only one .oh well..everyone else gone i guess..oh yea..ours weighed eighty pounds...
I think these bombs are to valuable for using it in Ukraine. They may be stationed near strategic positions in NATO countries, waiting to set off until the war with NATO and Russia is further escalated.
Ukraine has ALWAYS been known as the brains of the soviet union. Its where most of the nukes were designed and built. So the likelier story would be that if it looked like RUSSIA might win, that Ukraine would blow up half of RUSSIA with the ones they DIDNT give up after the Soviet Union fell. Of course the way things are going, Ukraine wont need nukes to blow up half of Russia, theres practically no military instalation they haven't successfully attacked, the last Train Tunnel to China was well over 1000 miles into Russia. I'm sure that long before theyd let Russia win, theyd take the gloves off and start hitting much easier civlian targets like the Russians have been doing since day 1. I guess the only real plus there is in fighting an enemy that PREFERS to kill women and children, is that you have nothing to loose by fighting to the last man,woman and child. And trying to take all RUSSIA's civilians with you. So you see its RUSSIA that should fear Ukraine losing, not the other way around, because they have been doing their worst for 2 solid years. Ukraine hasn't even BEGUN doing their worst.
Only a coward will use this nuclear weapon in Ukrainian: but the Russian will be fried too so help us God . Slava Ukrainian ❤ God is with you to victory ❤
The fissionable materials these smallest of tactical low yield weapons would lose their ability to create critical mass within a matter of months. I have to imagine that a major terrorist group would have already attempted to use any of those that they had managed to purchase them as "ready to use", and if not, a this point they are useless as a bomb . A country such as Iran however could theoretically maintain such a bomb although that hasnt been a story it seems.
I mean all countries in the world would use all means available to their disposal to protect their country and integrity 🤷♂️. Russia has that right too as a country. What is the deal with double standards and hypocrisy?
i don't know what i would do without my daily dose of paranoia
And utterly biased reporting by CRUD
lol
I think this channel is auto generated by a Russian AI. Alarmist clickbait nothing burgers. The best description for this channel. It's like they want to be fair like a socialist communist. Equality of outcome but inequality of facts. 50 / 50reporting of Ukraine and Russian successes which means they have to underreport Ukraine's success and over report Russia's han
Sutkec ke sath gayb ho jaege apne bhega baki. Sbko khtm khani
I hear. Clearly. Pakistani or india. Voice.....those loyals to putain
This is the plot of the movies "sum of all fears" and "Red-2" 😂😂😂😂
Some guy called that "strategic ambiguity", such a wiseguy.
Remember the days when Boris Jeltsin traveled around with Vodka in his suitcase😂😂…those were the days🤪
Almost as st*pid as Biden 😂
The biggest drunken president of Ussr who single handedly destroyed it.
I've lived in the us for 29 years only thing I've experienced was friendly fire from my own people
When a nation at war talks of a secret weapon, usually that's a bad sign that the war isn't going so great for them.
In Afghanistan the Western coalition has never talked about secret weapons, yet the war has not gone well there either. After twenty years of war and billions of dollars spent in vain, the world's No. 1 army, the super-technological US army, has fled Kabul in the face of a gang of ragtag Taliban armed only with AK47s and a few pickup trucks with machine guns. There is no word in the vocabulary to describe such a humiliating defeat. At least the Russians are fighting a real army largely supported by the major Western powers.
@@trumpforever6706 Nota bene.The best military analysis.
@@trumpforever6706 Lol low IQ Child after 9 Years and more losses then USA and allies in 20 years Russia ran from the same Sandal wearing farmers.
Oh and never controlled nearly as much territory.
USA and allies never lost a single battle in Afghanistan. not one.
Taliban would run off then come back and fight another day.
@@trumpforever6706 An AGREEMENT to Govern Afghanistan between the Talaban and US was sign in Doha Qatar on 02/29/2020, the Afghanistan women will surely appreciate 🙏 your support youknow.
@Emmanuel Agbor USSR did that.
They have many firsts... like collapsing first
US tested these already, seeing how long it would take for special forces to infiltrate and assemble the nuke.
I've seen this too, many times in hollywood films. Like how they can locate a person no matter where you are. Unfortunately, the reality is, it took 20 years to find Bin Laden
@dedel6954 it took 10 years, not 20. It also doesn't matter because the fish ate him. The other scumbag turned into shredded pork from a drone. You can run, and you can hide, but no matter how long it takes, we will find you and take you out.
@@Navybrat64 yeah, killing one guy does not stop them from getting another person in place. So 9/11 season 2 coming soon to a skyscraper near you. And then find rhat guy who masterminded it for another 10 years LOL
Man portable nuclear weapons. Of course they exist and most nuclear powers have them. Unfortunately, ATF won’t let me buy one on an ATF Form 4.
You don't have to buy them, the rest of the world already knows who the biggest terrorist is
talk to hunter suitcase full of coke and fentalyn
When a superpower says "IT'S POSSIBLE/ INVENTABLE" , be sure they already have it : they won't take any chance
The IRA did this in London with powerful homemade bombs. One was planted in the Brighton hotel weeks in advance of Mrs Thatchers party conference. I dunno how they pulled that off. How did he book a room that happened to be above Thatcher's bedroom. A huge chimney fell on her bed but the bitcz was up late 3am finishing off her speech. They had about 20 or more bombs planted at various hotels but the British police got lucky and caught the unit and one of them had a note in his back pocket with time and locations of all the bombs.
"with a note in his back pocket"...well done Paddy. Thanks.
@@briantitchener4829 she wasn't the only murderer that night to get a brain injury and Alzheimer's. Not sure if the other guy was a war criminal also but she was a brave woman or maybe more stupid than a "Paddy" no not racist and he may have been an empathetic loyalist prior to thatchers strong woman stance 💪🏻. At least she got nappies although she was in a hell only an Alzheimer's patient experiences so it didn't matter I suppose.
Still I hope karma is real and Putin gets pulled through the streets of Kyiv like the black and tans used to do to any of those stupid Paddy's that they caught. You should look up what they did to those they caught at crossbarry. Terrible 💔 . Stupid but brave but shur how could 100 farmer/IRA men with a months training (done with hockey sticks ) we call em hurleys , out fight 1,200 British ww1 soldiers in armoured cars at 2 AM. RIP lads 😢. ✌🏻 Churchill made our war poem famous tho by plagiarism against nazis. A Paddy poem. Thought that was written by intelligent people . Saved us from the Vikings too. Oh wait. No we showed them how that was done. Famine was our weak spot .....and empathy first until we started getting some American president's that escaped and washed up on American shores with a few survivers. Great history. Hats off to the Englishman who made ",the wind that shakes the barley" Unfortunately telling the truth earned him some bad reviews from even the self loathing gaurdian who stated " how much does.....he... (sorry for the bias) hate his own Country? Lmao
I remember when the USSR broke up and they announced they had lost or misplaced 19 of these suitcase weapons!
Uranium materials they're talking about require recharging but that's not what's used in modern portable atomic demolition charges they don't require recharging because they don't use uranium they use plutonium and cobalt nuclear materials I know because I went through a lot of hazmat training
If Russia continues to lose this war are we watching the same war? Or is Russia in a war with someone besides Ukraine I don't no about?
I once remember the number reported missing at the end of the Cold War was between 5 -11 missing suitcase bombs,; that s worrying enough, but 80+ is staggering.
YESS MORE AUDIO VIDEOS PLEASE 🙏🏽
Petr Cibulka in 2005: “I am convinced that Russian military intelligence (GRU) is directing terrorist activities against the United States and the West. This is Moscow’s main option for defeating the West. Therefore the GRU is supplying the Islamic terrorists with Russian nuclear weapons so the planned attack against the United States by Russia, China and their allies can follow.”
Quite literally, a tactical nuclear detonation can be delivered from artillery shells. As far as I have read, two man portable in terms of "suitcase" is about as small as anyone has or maintains. Smaller are possible and have been made, but it's not practical nor very effective bc the real power would likely be something much more powerful.
Now they can just put the warhead on a cruise missile type of platform. I was in a field artillery unit it would of been awesome to fire atomic Annie or nukes cannon even if it shortened life by a few years
@@georgewbushcenterforintell147 ------ > It wouldn't shortne life by "a few years". No one would survive a nuclear war. Whoever didn't die in the initial blasts would die of the nuclear fallout. The half-life of nuclear fallout from plutonium is said to be 250 thousand years. We're already facing problems with the utilization of nuclear energy.
EPA Facts about Plutonium semspub.epa.gov/work/HQ/176324.pdf
@@jannmutube also the EMP would destroy all electronics that are not shielded. Study by the US government said 90% of the population would be dead within a year without power .
The 2s7 Pion SPG can shoot these tactical nuclear weapons.
Nukes are fake.
Putin and all russian citizens need to learn that any weapon at their disposal could mean their disposal.
You have taken for granted your own 'disposal'!
U you the cleverest on earth. Nah you lying to yourself.
U you the cleverest on earth. Nah you lying to yourself.
This is correct. However you're missing the big picture. Don't patronize western military too much. If the inevitable happens and nukes were to fly back and forth across the globe, Russia will not be going down without taking anyone else with them. The UK is just a speck and will be gone, other western nations that are big enough will have their citizens end up as refugess in another country as their own country will become uninhabitable for decades.
Putin has already dactored that in and ultimately won't care
I don't Russia has the mentality to use chemical weapons.
I love this lady's voice when she speaks. It is very listenable.
I don't think they are missing or at least stolen, if so they would have used at least a couple by now. That is not to say that Russia still may have them at its embassy compounds around the world but if this were to happen, Russia would be no more!
the west would be no more
@@frankrenda2519 Another empty threat by a military that has had trouble tying their boots on so far. Frank try it just try it and you will unleash a whirlwind on the Orcs, A piece of advise don't be anywhere in the proximity of your Reptile Putin!
@william g are you aware Russians have 46 percent of world nuclear weapons?? Keep dreaming kid .. goo goo ga ga 😂
@@armanicharles5336 We in the west does not care if Russia has 90% of the Nukes. NATO will never allow those genocidal psychopaths in your beloved totalitarian country or that reptilian Putin to get anything close to a win in Ukraine!
@@williamgatheist1314 dream on 🤣🤣
It would be a great world if the major countries focused their time and energy on peaceful cooperation vs. war.
I am like willing to bet all of my life savings that each and every one of those devices that are missing we're not missing and sold.
The more you should be worried if you're western. It might end up on the hands of hard core extremists that hates the west so much.
@@dedel6954 people hate the West because we are champions. It sucks being a loser so I understand why they hate the West
@@uncuttcoffeeofficial yeah you suck d*cks that's right. You're all dumb and lazy, wants a desk job with a high paying income but does not fair well in education. The only thing you're champions at are your LGBTQ communities, drugs and abortions.
@@dedel6954you sound like heartbroken overweight middle school cheerleader that never made it on the team. What do you want me to do argue with you online with mighty words. Lol
@@uncuttcoffeeofficial i don't expect you to, i know the capacity of your comprehension and "mighty" is not something you all can be described with. LMFAO
This is hardcore fearmongering content here
Wow. These swords are astronomical.
Saw my first "suitcase" Nuke about 30 years ago at an Air Force Base in New Mexico, in a facility open to the public, yes, it was about the size and shape of a regular suitcase, but of course there was NO REAL BOMB inside of it!
Gay
@@pacoimeroxvida4404just like Putin and his lover lukashenko 😂
Luckily they can only damage around a city block if the article I read is accurate.
@@beastmode6225 Zele with his old senile loverboy always Sleeping J
I lived through the cold war days,when we had nuclear drills where we were all trained to hide under our tiny desks. And if there is one thing I learned from it, it was that my OWN goverment was in on the fear mongering, and used it to manipulate us all. THEY KNEW that desk wasnt going to save me, yet they insisted on terrorizing 3rd graders with nukes. Given the fact that my own government would bullshit us all like that, why would anyone be surprized that our worst enemy would make up stories about having nukes buried in US cities? Even if they had, I wouldn't have been nearly as pissed at our enemy for doing that as I was at my own government years later, for sending all us terrorized 3rd graders diving under our desks once a month *Just for the FUN of it?
if they didn't build them, how would they know it needs recharged every 3 months???
When questions come up like this, I think you already know it's just a ploy to do it, and then blame it on somebody else. Smh
I’m sure both sides have these, and both sides have deployed them. It still makes no sense to do so, even these would lead to Mutually Assured Destruction.
The movie “telefon” with Charles Bronson? Real or not?
Ukraine isn’t fielding a Warsaw Pact/NATO sized force or has anything that, if wiped out by such a strike, would turn the tide of the war. Considering the order of battle, Ukraine might lose a few hundred soldiers (and civilians), but the fallout from this ground burst would be floating over not only their own troops, but their own country.
What would be worth even such a small nuke detonation when the IMMENSE cost that would be exacted against Russia, from even their erstwhile “allies”, following such a strike, which would certainly FAR outweigh any benefits?
No, Putin may be an ass, but he’s not suicidal. And even if he was, those in the military that control the missiles, and the FSB that control the warheads certainly aren’t. Especially when there is no existential threat from Ukraine.
russia's nukes are meant for NATO not ukraine,ukraine will be dealt with in by conventional means
Exactly. But CRUX needs clicks.
@@briant5685 Good luck with that!
For having the supposed “second most powerful military” Ukraine has been handing you your ass “conventionally”. How many months has it been now since your military has actually gained ground rather than losing it day after day? How many of your troops, treasure, and all that equipment wasted? And now having to go hat-in-hand to N. Korea, China, Iran, and India. 😂
But I understand having to play with your nukes in public in a sad attempt to salvage at least a little pride, because in every other respect it must be so embarrassing, so humiliating, to be a Russian nationalist these days. 🤣
He probably has planted suitcase nukes here there and everywhere. But he knows that he will get it all back in full measure. Slava Ukraini!🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦
Ofcours after the destruction of the entire Ukraine
@@sequenceofficial6141 If you think about it, he has likely planted these nukes in his embassies and other establishments in virtually every city in the western world. If the worst happened and with megolmaniacs like Putin it could, the whole world would be laid to waist, including Ukraine.
I don't know if you have heard of the diplomatic bag. This is a centuries old system, where foreign nations can import goods into another country which goes straight to their embassy without being examined by customs or anyone else. It does not have to be a bag. It can be a large box or even a container. So it doesn't have to be a suitcase bomb. It could be far larger.
@@jinnbuster4753 Maybe some countries are naive and not well-equipped. But Putin definitely not planting anything in a USA embassy like that, things can happen but imagine the contingencies America has ready for Russia? Remember we have so much bases and influences in and around Russia if we wanted to start war pre-empitively we would decimate Russia quickly.
@@u-turnnewslive Well if we were talking about some third world country, Putin is not likely to waste his nukes on them, as they pose no threat to him. I am referring to the countries of the western world, most notably Europe , the USA, Australia and a few other countries. Around the world Russia has 147 embassies and a similar number of consulates, all with diplomatic immunity. There are also unknown numbers of "illegal" agents in most western countries. These people often pose as normal citizens leading quiet lives to avoid attention. We know this is true because our secret services do find them from time to time. I am not suggesting all of these are sitting on suitcase nukes, but the possibility is there.
I can only speak for my own country, the UK. I do not think we have sited such devices in Russia. It is not the sort of things we do. However Russia has a long track record of carrying out "wet jobs" and this is typical behaviour for them.
Britain has a clearly announced nuclear deterrent which could deliver between 40 and 80 nuclear weapons to the western part of Russia in the event of an attack on the UK. I say western Russia because that is where the vast majority of their population reside.
@@jinnbuster4753 your making stuff up. Ukraine is a racist country and usa should stop wasting millions of dollar on weapons. We should spend that money on ourself to build better medical schools or fund stem education or use it to build a new technology
Marudo is a smart business man without nuke
But you must recharge their cores every 90 days.
??
Tidbits for the curious
* Thaddeus Taylor - Gifted fission bomb designer, said to have even sketched out the design of a new bomb on the back of an envelope. Designed the most efficient fission bomb, the largest fission bomb, the smallest fission bomb, (25 lb but may have/ may not have been built. Promoted thorium powered reactors to reduce the threat of nuclear terrorists.
* Front Line (PBS investigative reporting) - "Russian Roulette." Feb-99. Excellent, maybe more pertinent now than in 1999.
This may have discussed-- In the 90s, a nuclear storage facility of highly enriched uranium east of Yakaterinburg was essentially unattended. Western news sources investigated, (Russia was relatively open to outsiders at that time), and found rogue elements had likely stolen hundreds of pounds of weapons grade uranium. (Pakistan exploded its first atomic bomb, 1998. Coincidence?)
SLAVA UKRAINI!!!!!!!
In all cities in US they have nuclear detection systems that are so sensitive they detect a nuclear watch worn by a person. (If) a suitcase nuke was used on US soil a full nuclear retaliatory strike would occur.
i know they have radiation detectors at every border crossing.
A full nuclear strike would mean Russia would also fire all its nukes and the US will cease to exist within 30 minutes.
And the world would be over so no one wins
@@xxmobstrxx8535 It's not true: the real surprise is that Russia would win the conflict on points, because a poor nation of only 145 million inhabitants would take the satisfaction of annihilating the much richer USA (330 million inhabitants), the whole of Europe (750 million) and all other allies, including Ukraine (40 million).
Trump had warned of the danger:
th-cam.com/video/71kvy99SV8w/w-d-xo.html
If it happens it will not be Trump's fault, but someone else's.
Sources?
Super Nintendo inside of the suit case
It is a threat not only to Ukraine but also to the world if it falls in the wrong hands.
not really... its BS here is my comment '' if Putin makes the mistake of using the nukes then the West will have no choice but to send all possible weapons to Ukraine which will cause the defeat to Russia. We can't give in to nuclear blackmail once... otherwise all countries possessing this weapon will do the same to get what they want!''
Bwwwaaahhaaaa
Ukraine or the world is a same target now?
i love it when he bluffs and says hes not bluffing .
us was not stupid . don't you think us would sit iddle and not also hidding the same evil things in russia ?
The US was working on a longer life power cell that would last for 4 years, but that is still a short time if one has to go and recharge or swop out the cell.
Yeah right, thats where ALL the money went...
We're sick of hearing about nuke threats he doesn't want to die or his cronies
i am very weary of people who carry suitcases and wear dark glasses
5:46 -6:05 Very interesting for a preemptive attack or a counterattack that would that would be one step ahead of a potential aggressor!
This is time saving compared to pausing in order to read the information
For all we know, cell phones are such devices!!! 🤯
Well that actually would be very hard to get in to the USA whoever is tasked to bring it in would give themselves out immediately nobody uses suitcases anymore unless the smuggler is a 75year old who doesn't know how to use a smart phone and even that rare now.
Millions are coming across our southern border from every country on the planet.
Perspective: In rural areas of Russia there are lots of adults who have never been in a motor vehicle of any kind.
While that is true, you made it sound like no developed countries ever having such social gap. Or maybe I'm just being prejudiced after consuming a half full liquor.
If there here, then they're there.
Just a thing but the US government flys special helicopters over the United States that can detect things like a suitcase nuke . You can see the flights of these helicopters on any app that tracks air traffic .
Oh really 🤔? Hopefully that’s true 🇺🇸
Try your best hahaha
You will face nukes soon dear
Ssssh you'll interrupt Crux creating panic. Just like if you point out, that if this happened Russia would end a few days later, so it'll never happen.
" The public may see a twin-engine Bell 412 helicopter, which is equipped with radiation sensing technology and operated by NEST’s Aerial Measuring System based at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland. The helicopter will fly in a grid pattern over the areas at 200 feet (or higher) above the ground at a speed of approximately 80 mph."
Goodness I hope Russia shows the world not to mess with them.
The backpack nukes the Soviet Union used to have Putin said he had some stashed in America well if he did like any battery that you ever had the pit would have corroded and it would no longer work does he still have backpack nukes only if they've remanufactured the pit that is in them because they corrode and break down and have a limited shelf life
How does that work, why a battery to maintain the pit's viability?
@@zhoubaidinh403 there's not a battery to maintain the pit the pit like a battery corrodes and then it's no longer round and then it doesn't work because it's not the right shape
If you do a gun design with U235, you may not need the precise tolerance of a plutonium implosion device.
Man putin is waiting for the i got you guys moment he will be like i warned you now your dead you just don't know it yet 😂😂😂😂
the atomic bomb " gun barrel " design is just a tube with uranium at both ends then a explosive charge fires the uranium bullets at each other . the impact and heat cause a atomic detonation ... these can be made small enough to fit in a howitzer shell .and uranium last a long time no need to re-fuel .
so atomic briefcase might be more accurate ..[ look up " little boy and fat man " ]
Russia has right to protect their country, their interests and they dont want Nato expansion. US and NATO are provoking them all the time.
𝗢𝗳 𝗣𝗼𝗽𝗲 𝗙𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗶𝘀, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗼𝗳 𝗪𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝗪𝗮𝗿 𝗜𝗜𝗜
Last week, a conversation with Pope Francis was published, in which he related to the Russia-Ukraine war as the start of World War III. In a conversation with the editors of European Jesuit publications, and which was first published by the Italian Jesuit publication La Civiltà Cattolica, the Pope said, “The world is at war. For me, today, World War III has been declared.” Subsequently, he lamented, “What is happening to humanity that we have had three world wars in a century?” I do not believe that the Russia-Ukraine conflict is a third world war or that it should devolve into one. However, the fact that there is such a danger, or that there is war at all, shows that we have not drawn the right conclusions, which puts us in harm’s way again.
It is clear to everyone that no one has anything to gain if the war in Ukraine escalates into a global conflict. That said, the war is yet another indication that we still do not know how to govern our desire for dominance and control.
We have come to a point where our ego does not settle for controlling others. Nowadays, people are willing to destroy others for simply behaving or even thinking differently from them.
If we want to prevent wars, we need to help all the nations realize that war does not bring any benefits, that we do not want it and do not need it. This is a process that must involve everyone, since each country must have its neighbors going through the same process, or belligerent countries will exploit other countries’ efforts to end violence.
If countries do not adopt this approach, they will continue to compete against each other, exploit each other and deplete the earth of resources. We are already seeing the consequences of this attitude on our planet, but they will grow far worse in the very near future. Hunger, extreme heat, extreme cold, and countless other problems will overwhelm humanity and force nations to stop abusing others and focus on their own survival.
To prevent this scenario from developing further than it already has, humanity needs to understand that we must learn to work together or nature will destroy us. Currently, many nations are still dreaming of conquests and subjugations of other nations. We must gradually make these nations understand that doing so will only harm them, and harm everyone else, as well. Unless we help everyone realize that we are dependent on each other for better or worse, and we must act accordingly, we will all be in big trouble.
If only...I wish we All could learn to coexist on this wonderful planet🙏🇸🇪
Elon smuggled the suitcase nukes to mars
If you were Russia what would you have done Only 80 of them are missing.
Amaizing how creative the Ukranians are making a few thousand dollar drones able to sink Russian warships and submarines like today they did
They haven’t sunk any of Russia’s submarines LMFAO ! Layoff the bs propaganda
Having to maintain these things for thirty years for whatever plan people had for them without any detection of them or showing up anywhere in all this time makes the whole story seem like bullshit.
This does not bode well but should not come as any great surprise.
,If Russia does this Moscow goes down in a Nucler cloud. MAD WORKS
It's just hard workers taking their work home.
worrisome news! The report should have been dedicated to bots who comment shamelessly that Putin's nukes won't explode. "Generations to come with scarce belief that such a man ( sorry, modern-day bots) as this (these),in flesh and blood, walked upon this Earth"
They put them in the mountains around the places they deem threats completely incased in cultured geopolymer with high mineral content witch is immune to x-rays and radiation detectors there would only be a USB hole in the side of a mountain of not connected to a underground electrical scource or wires
Go Russia! Protect your land it is your right to do so.
Like hell Russian DM admitted to this suitcase Nukes to Weldon,😂😂😂😂
If any one use nukes first it will be nato or Ukraine. If that happens well don’t blame Russia for her response
We saw what they have
Nuclear is not a problem
I hope so
Putin needs to just go get in drag and show the world that he's officially into S&M.
yes.
Ya and he dont know where most of them are
Maybe Ukraine 🇺🇦 has some????👍🇦🇺🇧🇧🇺🇦
This all stems from a guy who was voted “Top 20 Most Corrupt Members of Congress,” was known for his theatrics, and made his entire political career by pointing out “bad guys,” from local motorcycle gangs to foreign intelligence officers. He enjoyed the spotlight and making headlines, but wasn’t exactly credible.
Make no mistake about it...if he used one he may as well set it off in his living room....and wish himself good bye ...
Pfft ! You think Russia can’t hit America 🤡
Happy new year to the sad people at Crux 😂
He doesn’t need them nothing can touch the new intercontinental ballistic RS-28
Crux we have been asking you to give us report on kremina,we need to know what happened to the Ukrainian troops that entered kremina few days ago,🤣🤣🤣🤣
Everybody needs to know
Ask from elesky😂 he always active tweeter and tiktok!
Occasionally pop up on Ebay .. tracking is unreliable , returns not accepted, DONT ask for a refund . .
Please give one suitcase to Zelensky
Russia’s missile!!! Russia’s !Not Putin’s missile .
Nato nato not this iraq palestine afghanistan this is the Greatest bear
Russia not the only one to have suitcase nukes..u.s.has them too..able to take out six square city blocks..or about sixty thousand people..and as i said before...can be built in a simple machine shop..anyone else read mechanics illustrated in the 70s...or am i the only one .oh well..everyone else gone i guess..oh yea..ours weighed eighty pounds...
I think these bombs are to valuable for using it in Ukraine. They may be stationed near strategic positions in NATO countries, waiting to set off until the war with NATO and Russia is further escalated.
Ukraine has ALWAYS been known as the brains of the soviet union. Its where most of the nukes were designed and built. So the likelier story would be that if it looked like RUSSIA might win, that Ukraine would blow up half of RUSSIA with the ones they DIDNT give up after the Soviet Union fell. Of course the way things are going, Ukraine wont need nukes to blow up half of Russia, theres practically no military instalation they haven't successfully attacked, the last Train Tunnel to China was well over 1000 miles into Russia. I'm sure that long before theyd let Russia win, theyd take the gloves off and start hitting much easier civlian targets like the Russians have been doing since day 1.
I guess the only real plus there is in fighting an enemy that PREFERS to kill women and children, is that you have nothing to loose by fighting to the last man,woman and child. And trying to take all RUSSIA's civilians with you. So you see its RUSSIA that should fear Ukraine losing, not the other way around, because they have been doing their worst for 2 solid years. Ukraine hasn't even BEGUN doing their worst.
84 were stolen but 115 were sold
Only a coward will use this nuclear weapon in Ukrainian: but the Russian will be fried too so help us God . Slava Ukrainian ❤ God is with you to victory ❤
The fissionable materials these smallest of tactical low yield weapons would lose their ability to create critical mass within a matter of months. I have to imagine that a major terrorist group would have already attempted to use any of those that they had managed to purchase them as "ready to use", and if not, a this point they are useless as a bomb . A country such as Iran however could theoretically maintain such a bomb although that hasnt been a story it seems.
Sure sure everything russia has is useless and everything nato and it’s allies have is the best . Have you heard yaself 😂
There is no Ukraine in 2023
Ohhh
1001 night
Nice
We know we cannot trust Russia.
Boom goes the cuckoo's nest!
MrNesley Louis
Why would Putin sneak a suitcase nuke into Ukraine when it would be easier just to launch a missile?
Yes, they’re here in the US already. Read “Through the Eyes of the Enemy” by Stanislav Lunev.
🎉 The curious person tô know this ,should ask Putin directly asking others will not hear you😅😅😅
crazy
Do you really think that Putins Generals will let him push the button? they are not as stupid as Putin, they know that Russia would cease to exist.
Man in the suitcase
Hé certainly has big suitcases full of money , and diamonds ready to fly to Syria.