Everything Wrong With Those "100 Years of..." Videos - RANT
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ก.ย. 2018
- hope u still love me coughs
_____________
My Instagram: bit.ly/2Qo9rrI
My blog: bit.ly/2nnB89S
My nudes: bit.ly/2DAvz0u
You can also buy me a coffee!: bit.ly/2IvBsJY
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 68 | คู่เอก "พระจันทร์ฉาย vs โจนาธาน"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/F3IM3w-XchI/mqdefault.jpg)
"Why would you pretend you know stuff when you don't?"
Girl this is the million dollar question for most of humanity.
ليش مسوي فيها تعرف عربي وحاط صورة عرضك حرف النون وانت ما تعرف عربي تءتءتء
Even worse is when you believe you know what you are talking about but really don't. I get so embarrassed 😳 when I find out that was me. Yikes.
Ikr
me_(._.)_
The only situation to do this is on an exam lol. Write a professional sounding answer and make it sound like you know what the hell you're talking about and hope for the best
“No 👏 one 👏 wore 👏 eyeliner 👏 in 👏 1940s 👏” loved her reaction
Depends where you are tbh but, I live how she's just like NO YOU DIDN'T RESEARCH PROPERLY
Not in the west no, but in North Africa and the middle east, its been worn for thousands of years.
@@ahamilton3435 Is that where the person in the video is from? Are they wearing North African or Middle Eastern fashion makeup?
@@SexiestPenguin thank you. The original video was supposed to be showing makeup and hairstyles from the West
@@ahamilton3435 I
5555uu65Touch and hold a clip to pin it. Unpinned clips will be deleted after 1 hour.416618416618416618416618416618416618416618Tap on a clip to paste it in the text box.Tap on a clip to paste it in the text box.Touch and hold a clip to pin it. Unpinned clips will be deleted after 1 hour.
Plot twist: the woman in the 1920s hat WAS wearing a cloche- she just has an extremely large pointy head and it fills the hat out entirely
So... coneheads are real? O: !!
This is the worst thing I've ever read and I love it
Omg I can't stop laughing
This comment totally made my day
@@donkeywithascarf2435 u just provoked my worst nightmare 🤣
i think it's really weird and bad when people try to "sexy-fy" things. if you are trying to show what the actual style is... you have to show the actual style, no matter how unflattering you think it is. it's not about your opinion, it's about whats accurate.
Exactly. These videos are supposed to teach people what was considered fashionable back then, not how to make them “look sexier”
Also what’s with trying to sexy-fy women‘s fashion. Can we not sexualize every single aspect of womanhood
I’m a veteran and agree with this when I see women in uniform in movies. Our uniform and hairstyle is not for beauty, it is for function.
@@lesmortimers4791 yes! smh not everything a women wears and does is for your appeal
True. Especially when their videos are about timelines and decades in history
How can they messed up 90’s?? They probably lived the 90s wtf
XD
Tragic lol
I didn't live through the 90's I started to exist in 1998 😂😂
@@cottoncandy2023 whats your point? Do you work for cut?
Duck Meat I see you everywhere lol
*puts on a wig and a white dress*
woohoo im marilyn monroe
*dips finger in some black paint and dots it under my nose somewhere random*
Lol I have her beauty mark
Rencs lets just appreciate that this white chic is schooling other white chics on lace front wigs ant it’s got this black chic saying “”yyyaaaassss queen teach them about those lace fronts!!!!!”
Roger can be anyone he wants to be
Legends say you can bring her to the realm corporeal by putting a blonde wig on a white dress, turning on a fan, and saying "boop boop bee doop" three times
Hi roger
One time in elementary school I didn’t know what to do for decade day so I just put a leopard print skirt or something on and pretended I was some kind of cave person
Elementary school fashion icon
We stan
Hai always wore the 80’s look because it was the one my mom remembered the most
Mood
I absolutely love that. You win decade day 10/10
I read the article cut wrote about your video and they basically said “history is idealized and generalized so we idealized and generalized fashion but didn’t point that out and presented our video as fact” like that’s not a problem good historians are constantly trying work against. lol the article was also written by a man which is probably why he thought generalizing women based on mainstream fashion was fine and good.
Wait they made a article? Damn
Wow they’re literally admitting to the very thing she called them out for, with no second thought that maybe it’s not the best idea. You’d think they’d at least consider taking a closer look at their research to make it look more historically accurate.....also I’m not surprised it was written by a man lmao
"the article was written by a man..."
why im not even surprised?
why are you all being sexist?
@@temporaryaccount5698 ?
"Sexy" in 2010 is completely different from "sexy" in 1952.
Just because you think it's unflattering or even frumpy now doesn't mean it wasn't irresistible when it was in style.
Fashion "historians" like Cut need to realise that.
Sucks, doesn't it. I'm a perfectly built "sweater girl"
madtabby66 you rock those sweaters gurl
madtabby66
*I'm a 1900s housewife, nice to meet you-*
that is not actually true
the notion that things are supposed to be irresisitible is newer too
Like they would understand that
Ironically, those Cut videos made me realize I had an interest in old fashion, which in turn sparked research and made me realize how bad those videos are
Same
Same with me , i know use my drawing skills to make new concepts for old dresses or adds modern details to victorian skirts. Idk how i never realized it since i love modern fashion and i live for history.
That's like me with Memoirs of a Geisha. It got me to want to learn more about geisha and kimono, only to eventually learn what a historically inaccurate and problematic mess the book and movie are.
@@BiologicalClock really? I always assumed the book was accurate.
Same with me. I read Memoirs of a Geisha many years back. I was actually quite young, but wanted to read the ‘adult books’ to seem cool. I was given the impression That Geisha’s and we’re legitimately just women Who served as traditional sex workers. But now, I obviously see that it is completely different. Being a Geisha is an art form in itself. It requires a lot of discipline, hard work and dedication to be one.
Something ive never understood about companies like Cut and Buzzfeed and Glamour is that they refuse to hire anyone with knowledge or experience in the video theyre making. Like, they have the money! They have the resources! If they wana make quality videos why not put in a little more effort to (at the very least) have an expert vet their video before posting.
Glamour,though,has learned,and hired a lot of dress historians.
Glamour,though,has learned,and hired a lot of dress historians.
Because they are woke and I'm talking about people that call themselves feminist but they actively try to hurt men ...like there is literally whole post about feminist saying they wish they could kill their son because they are a man ...... And they hate anyone that has or used to have a penis and when I mean hate I mean they hate them like the kkk hates poc and gay people
@@goreandhoodies3626 This has nothing to do with feminists hating men lmao. Why tf are you bringing it here?
Women's fashion is getting the short end of the stick in these videos. And they are sexualising styles that are not meant to be sexualized in the first place.
They don't care...it's a cash grab for them. Why bother being accurate as long as you're getting views?
1920's women: we deserve rights! we will wear beautiful dresses and step out from societal norms because the war is over!
cut: aha don't say that ur so sexy ;)))))
what
asfjhkgmga so true
LMAOOO
Don't worry guys, they're 100% feminists
(According to modern trends)
vomit 🏃♀️ run flappers, run
Karolina: makes video showing actual common fashions
Cut: is offended that she “ripped into them”
Karolina: actually rips into them
Dont forget about red lipstic you ignorant
She didn't rip into them she merely pointed out a few things. She didn't even go into the fabric or posture.
Olive Oil Bernadette: *rips into your filthy Muggle soul with her on-brand fabric shears while educating you on your historical inaccuracies in a furious yet polite manner in your last few minutes until death*
mood
@@rodericknguyen4418 the only way to go
1920’s comes up
Karolina: noOoöôóœō
P S Mainly liked this comment to get this to 1k
Honestly, me too
I get really tired of only costumes, or costume-like outfits being the only thing a search engine pulls up when trying to find authentic twenties clothing.
@@TheCelticSelkie. same, it irritates me
P S even i was shocked at 1920
Me: Mom can we get Marilyn?
Mom: no we have Marilyn at home
Marilyn at home 9:13
LMAO, dollar store Marilyn
😂😂😂😂😂
Oh no
Oh no
@@crazycatperson4953 if that’s dollar store Marilyn, then 6:17 is the Marilyn someone left out on the sidewalk with a “free” sign strapped to her
Those badly reproduced hats have the same energy as someone who can’t follow a simple origami tutorial and ends up just winging it
As a person who cannot do origami for my life, I feel very attacked right now.
@@just-trying-my-best-everyday me too. You have no idea how many perfectly good peices of origami paper I wasted trying to make at least one half decent paper crane when I was nine.....
....looks at my horrible origami and looks away.
I like origami
Heh, WINGing
She's like a beautiful young timelord that could also possibly be your great grandma
I thought she is an ancient Polish vampire
ElvinGearMaster Irma With her beautiful pale skin i’ll also go for the vampire theorie.
Yaaaassss! You're right! She's 100% a Time Lord. Worship at her feet 🙌
Polish vampire timelord.
Well, she's going to be 14th Doctor's incarnation 🌚👍
They tried to pull a mega “wOkE” move but genuinely like ignoring working class women isn’t very wOkE of you cut
_ Hiskaryan _ true
_ Hiskaryan _
bUt MaH sEXy
It wasn't very cash-money of them. lol
@Interstellar Overdrive not very cash-money of you
(Also at InSomnia)
@Interstellar Overdrive 👏more👏female👏ceo's👏
Karolina: This isn’t accurate.
Cut: You think you can make a better video?!
Karolina: * does *
Cut: 😧
Karolina: * makes a harmless video about historical fashion and how Cut could have improved *
Cut: And I took that personally
Lmfao
1910s: wow an original dress, very well done glamour :)))
1920s: nnnOoOoooOoOOOoo
To be fair, she did say that the model was too tall lol
@@psychopopbunny Too tall for the dress
I think the 20's is one of the most butchered decades when they try to replicate it...the ultra flapper style with the skirt too short for that era and the wrong shape
they always get the dress length wrong
xD
Listen. Sex is cool sometimes. But why do hair and makeup stylists for these videos always unnecessarily prioritize sexy over accuracy? It’s cheap, disconnected, cold-hearted to the subject matter, and confusing.
My reaction is justified. “100 Years of ____ Fashion” is historical, therefore necessarily attracts a sentimental demographic. History is an emotional thing and studios should know what they are getting into.
XII Ikr! I’m all about people dressing how they want but during these times being showcased in the 100 years videos, you couldn’t dress the way you’d like to. So, making vintage sexy or whatever is inaccurate.
It is very much a sign of the times. Sex is over-prioritized in our media culture and they think what they're doing won't sell or have the audience they want (which is predominently very young people) interested in it if it looks - to their minds - alienatingly 'old' or fuddy-duddy.
I think they underestimate people, to be honest. Yes, some people will 'ewww' at or have no interest in anything that isn't sold as sexy-hawt (when you realise the extent of sexy-hawt right now is limited to Kardashian butt surgery and drag-queen make-up and giant arses twerking - absolute pornographic crudeness that many find truly alienating - one may question the validity of this) but there are plenty of people about who love anything historical and will be fascinated and inspired by true representations of old style. It might just not be the exact audience they want to buy their rag, though.
I can definitely relate to this comment. But what can you say, sex sells.
XII because women are supposed to look Sexy. Women are only valued for their sex appeal
It's like they can't grasp that the accurate looks were considered sexy in their own time. Someday our grandchildren will look at photos of us from the late 2010s and think our skimpy cleavage baring tops and skin tight high waisted pants are old fashioned and unattractive, but it's the standard "Instagram model" brand of sex appeal in the present day. I remember when hip hugging low ride jeans were the sexual clothing item and now, they're "outdated and gross." And that was just about 2 decades ago. Silhouettes aren't chosen at random from a hat by designers. Trends flow according to ever-shifting ideas of what "attractive" looks like.
God I can’t wait for in like 70 years when I’m old an look onto my phone and I see cut making a video saying that everyone in 2020 looked like Kate Middleton
underrated
i can’t stop laughing
Not this 😭😭
or kim kardashian :(((((
or were instagram influencers
@@edenjaycollins6055 they will definitely say everyone looked like her and loved her and had that figure and that no one dressed differently.
I'm a vintage hairstylist and I cringe everytime I see modern stylists attempting historical hairstyles xD
what a cool job!!! 💜
Just curious but what does a vintage hairstylist do? I don't imagine modern people wanting a vintage hair style so is it like a movie thing?
Historical hairstyles need historical techniques and products! (Unless, yk, they’re deadly)
Cool job!
I was a teenager in the '80s. The color of the 80's dress was totally wrong. We did wear flower print dresses, but they were small calico type prints and colors were brighter and saturated jewel tones. As you talked about with the hats, it comes down to the details and not just *what* was worn, but *how* it was worn.
martialartess I lived in the American South for a year at the very end of the eighties (1989-1990). So many girls still wore those (mostly to church...), and they had these enormous lace collars, remember those? And the big hair! (Sorry, ozone layer...). Meanwhile in the Netherlands, we wore wide-legged jeans and chucks and sort-of cropped tops - one leg in the 90s already!
I seem to remember lots of big bright floral prints, and pastels. However, that was more for kids, and maybe some teens. Maybe prom dresses.
But I do just remember big florals in general. Not just dresses.
Agree that that's definitely not an 80s dress. My wardrobe in the 80s was pink, turquoise, teal, purple, blue, grey... but not those yellows and browns. Everyone at the time would have turned their noses up at something that looked so "70s" in coloration.
Also her hair wasn't big enough. I'm guessing the stylist or model didn't want to do all that backcombing we used to do.
Kiki I guess my experiences are just different. Yes, Jewel tones were big. Just something about those giant florals and puffy sleeves. I wouldn’t call it 1990s, though. No one would wear that in the 1990s.
@@sallyvillarreal4294 I agree that the cut of the dress is okay (and definitely not 90s). It's mostly the color that's wrong.
I agree with the original poster that I don't remember big florals in the 80s either. Smaller floral patterns, yes. But mostly geometric shapes and big blocks of color.
“And the hair is tragic it’s really bad”
Me when I look in the mirror
Sammi Williams
I’m sure you have beautiful hair :)
Same
I literally have a hair antennae
Me when I first wake up lmao
Oh sis, u have GOT to see my hair then. It's a tragedy 😭
The one and only
You shouldn't worry about how harsh you're being. you did actual research, and Cut already got on your case because you as a person with a significantly smaller budget managed to make something far better than they did. Let them be pissed off, I say! They can learn a lesson from you.
"No one wore eyeliner in 1940s, that's kinda more of a 1950s thing." Hell, even for most of the '50s pretty much only celebrities and models wore it.
I find it crazy how women feeling forced to paint their face daily is SO NORMALIZED that people can't even fathom women in the PAST not wearing makeup.
Karolina: makes well researched video to educate people about the truth
Cut: iS tHiS a PeRsOnAL aTtAcK oR sOmEtHiNg?!1!
@Jeremy Hicks Can't believe how hard that is for so many to imagine
I love ur profile photo 😂
facts
I actually found her video from the suggested options from the cut video....I prefer her’s over Cut but oh well
Whats the cuts video tho
karolina zebrowska: *exists*
Any '100 years of' video: *Sweats*
Wow 2k likes and not one reply OwO
2.9k likes
3 comments
👀👄👀
👁👅👁
👁️👃👁️
🧿👄🧿
I'm convinced that Karolina is an immortal being who is here to tell us about fashion. She knows so much because she lived through it.
As a general rule, any TH-cam channel big enough to put out tons of content, especially format-consistent, specialty topic videos, they are assembled by a staff of people who are not actually experts, and often presented by someone who's basically a spokesman/woman. If you want actual information, and not some kind of pop-culture surface-level garbage, you don't go to those channels. You go to a channel run by a single person who knows the subject - like this one.
I'm not a fashion historian by any measure but some of these do just hurt to watch, they're so obviously wrong and lazy
tamara turford They even get the 80’s, 90’s and 2000’s wrong! Like how!!! They’re from the era.
I noticed this alot in those videos and they also tend to follow stereotypes. After taking a film class and seeing a few movies from those eras (i.e not a historical fashion goddess like her) I cringe at the 1920s the most.
Lazy, yes. And pandering. As we've learned this year especially, Hollywood and the fashion industry and all the other chattering classes think we are stupid hicks and will fall for anything they throw our way.
*cough* the 1920s that they mess up on every single one...
Cordelia Chase oh, yeah. I’ve always noticed they get the 2000s wrong. I was alive back then if they need help
"Ava gardener is gonna raise from her grave and beat you up baby" im rolling omg
Koda D.S so is Ava Gardener lol
Someone send link so someone can get rick rolled
Gardner*... up,* I’m*
Aaron Mackenzie Gardner*...
Neither of you know who she is, do you?
90s: Minimalism characterized the fashion at the time
Me: My tie-dye, scrunchie shirts, and punk clothes from that time would like to have a word with you. This is a great example of how showing just what the "starlets" wore does not necessarily reflect what everyone wore!
yeah i think specially (more evident) starting from the 60s there were so many and varied sub-cultures/styles/trends/social idealism etc every year (i mean in the other eras too, but its more pronounced from here) so you cant just point out an era/decade by one outfit (even less if your outfit its totally wrong hahaha).
Yeah, 90s definitely wasn't a minimalist period. I was a kid through the nineties, so I wasn't that fashionable, lol, but I do remember the clothes weren't minimal, and like you said with tie-dye shirts and everything. I think they're confusing the Mary-Kate and Ashley era (1998-1999, early 2000s) with the nineties by using that dress, lmao. But even the Olson twins didn't slick their hair back, so I have no clue where tf the people making the video got THAT from. smh
@@sakura_kitkat7896 It's like they combined the Mary-Kate and Ashley style with the slicked back emo white boy who tried to bleach his hair but it ended up yellow.
@@dracofirex Lmao, so very true XD
Don’t forget all the light up stuff that came out at the end of the decade, plus sequins!
"Ava Gardner is going to raise from her grave and beat you up, baby"
The level of sass in this video
"I feel like a lot of people could be offended by me not agreeing with them."
The 21st century in a nutshell.
Nila Rowan Isn’t that the truth. It’s amazing how triggered people get because you don’t agree with them. Because, you know, THEY’RE RIGHT! And your stupid, ignorant, or uneducated! It boggles my mind how self righteous and smug people are nowadays. To get MAD?
@@mangot589 youre doing the same rn tho ?
Mica Um..No? People are entitled to their own opinion. Isn’t that what I said?
Honestly don‘t think that it‘s a 21st century problem. People have always gotten offended over small things. I just think that the internet has really helped us find wayyyy more people we could disagree with.
😂😂😂 the irony lmao
Yeah in the 20's, the dresses weren't so fitting. They almost were like potato sack fit (to fit with the popular tomboy-ish flat chested body type). The weird tall bell hat got me cackling.
I was in a production of Radium Girls and I felt like a flour sack
I think it's called a cloche?
@@gianinamorales8597 honey no that's not a cloche hat. Cloche hats are fitting; this is the ripoff from a sewer in some alternate universe
Fun fact : my great grand mother made a dress with a potato sack in the 20s because she was very poor.
....I believe that most people in the 20's where super homophobic but they liked women that looked like men.....ya seems very gay to me but that's just me
Karolina : makes a video for education
Cut: So... you have chosen death..
I’m a theater costumer, I work at a high school and middle school. We’ve done a number of period shows with the high schoolers, and they love the research and seeing what was historically correct. I hang hair and makeup inspiration around the dressing room, I share research boards before I show my sketches. I’ve had so many great conversations about parting hair and burying Bobby pins!
So the sort of target audience age range for these videos can care about historical accuracy, and do! It shows such a lack of faith in the curiosity and varied interest of their audience when allure or cut or whoever moderns up everything.
Dude that sounds so fun. I wish I had that in school
the beanie is the pill box hat of the 2000's. in 2000 you'd wear them normally, like someone going skiing or some shit. in the mid 2000's you'd wear them so they'd practically fall off the back of your head because you're emo. early-mid 2010's, you wore them smurf/condom style. late 2010s-early 2020 you wear them rolled up like an art school student. in this essay I will
OMG I did all of it and I'm far from a fashionista!
😆
So accurate!!
That’s why I hate beanies 😂 that smurf/c***** style has me dead 🤭😂
OP where’s the essay
i feel offended with the emo part
I am convinced that you're a time traveler
plot twist: she's actually doctor who
@@lillith5389 yoooooo she'd be a great doctor who I'd watch that
oh she definitely is
*there is a very real possibility that she is Dr. Who*
@@lillith5389 who?
My grandmother, born in 1910 always said, "When you put on a hat, TILT IT!"
How do you mess up 1990’s? That’s like the easiest decade for us to figure out how to style!
yeah and the fact those people and artists were actually adults/teens in that decade like cmon! use your fckng memory
It wasn’t even that long ago-
The only one of these that i really liked is “100 years of corgi fashion” where there was just corgis for every year, but the last one had a BOW TIE
red x purple Wow I need to watch that
AMAZING
i saw one for 100 years of kitten fashion and it was the same cat every decade
jojo swia
Hahahaha that sounds awesome.
When I saw these a few years ago I was actually offended. I'm a fashion historian. It made me NUTS I was offended that some one claimed to know what they were doing. And now people think that this is legit. It pissed me off.
I love your hair and topp you are so cute uwu
9:44 My instant reaction was "Cleopatra was from the 60's?!"
The Cleopatra movie where Liz and Dick began their scandalous affair was a huge style influence.
Seamstress: Ok so do you want vintage clothes or modern day clothes?
Cut’s fashion designer: *yes*
can you react to Buzzfeed’s historically accurate princesses? I want to know if it’s actually historically accurate or not.
I think she or someone else did a video. Spoiler alert: it's not accurate at all.
"Georgia in the 1840's"
It's Buzzfeed, therefore, it's inaccurate.
@@mothbqlls6632 That sentence physical hurts me.
Haven't even seen it and the answer is no
The fact that instead of THANKING you for bringing light to what was realistic back then and correcting their chanel, they wanna shame you for being smarter and clearly more educated? Speak your mind girl because YOU know whats up and their cheap, low quality videos can’t even compare to yours. Keep up with what ur doin 💕
Agreed
Preach it!
Cut were very immature with their response. I like the fact Karolina is teaching my uneducated ass about historical fashion. I find it interesting and she really goes into detail about it, which is super helpful.
"Show me an example of casual 1920s fashion"
Society: *shows a flapper girl*
😐
Karolina: **makes an honest (and brilliant) video that shows the reality of fashion without the sugar-coat or it**
Cut: ..and I took that personally
"I did my best to be a constructive critic, but it still pissed them off, so f*ck it Ima judge you hard!"
You're my favourite, Karolina.
Those “100 year” videos are faker than my personality
🤣🤣
Lmaoo
A self burn! That's a rare one
LMAOOOO
LMAO I JDJ CJ'S WIFIEOWO
That's the truth. The inaccuracies in these kinds of videos makes me cringe. There is no reason not to hire stylists, hairstylists, and makeup artists who have experience in vintage.
Thank you for saying out loud what so many of us were thinking.
I watched the 100 years of Girls fashion and the 80s and 90s were so wrong! There were people in the comments saying they wished they lived in the 80s because of the outfit but I was like 🤦♀️
"I'm wondering how harsh I can be..." LET IT OUT, GIRL.
Honestly, to me this wasn't judgmental enough. We have every right to be irritated and expect better from popular media capitalizing on something that we're passionate about in a very lazy way. These types of videos had huge audiences, and they typically portrayed fashion in very costumey ways. Because let's be honest, it would take way too much time, effort and money for them to bother getting it right. They don't care about accuracy, or misinforming a huge audience, they care about the views. And people who care about this topic have every right to feel angry and insulted.
Testify!
that’s just sad... I smell the fresh air of greedy people.
Best comment!
I agree. People have this image of vintage that's very halfassed and it shows.
Even big budget movies set in the 20's and 30's always get things wrong. Sometimes you see wonderful clothes and sets, but the hair is ALWAYS curled too loosely, the eyebrows are ALWAYS too thick.
At this point I'm convinced that it's willful ignorance.
+
“You guys really like when I’m judgmental about things”
Yes, we do. We really do.
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR POINTING OUT THE FACT THAT 1920'S DRESSES DID NOT GO ABOVE THE KNEE!!!! I hate when people say
" ThEy WeRe TaKiNg RiSkS bY WeArInG sHoRt DrEsSeS" but then pare it with a dress that exposes the knee. Do they not realize that before the 1920's it was frowned upon showing your freaking ankle? They were taking risks by having a dress that came a foot of the ground.
Eventually, someone will try to summarize the 2010's...
HELL NO.📛❎🙅😨
Emily Gaming They already have and it’s always dead wrong! How can something be wrong when we all loved it and can see pictures!! They even said the biggest blonde of the early 2000’s was Shakira. And every girl was screaming “It was BRITNEY!”. If they can’t even get our own era right, how can they get back then right?
Cordelia Chase hello Gaga was the biggest blonde
@@justsomehipsterwithaniphon705
in the early 2000's? lmao no, what?
Gaga joined the scene in 2008; Britney was there since the start of the decade, and even in the late 90s.
smh.
I'm vintage
I don't really have a problem with videos showing a modern interpretation of vintage looks but they should be honest about what they are doing. Pretending to be historically accurate, while not being historically accurate is fraudulent. These videos were probably and maybe secretly sponsored by companies trying to sell people products; hair styling products, makeup, clothing, accessories, shoes etc. What they should have done is said, here is the vintage look but you can achieve this inspired modern look with these products. That would have been much more respectable.
I really feel sorry for the junior producers of these videos though. They were probably just handed a list of items to find and a deadline without any real information on what exactly was required. I keep thinking about that cloche hat that was so terribly wrong. Wrong hat, wrong size for the model and on shoot day they probably just had to fudge it. That was definitely a "Oh shit! We don't have time to fix this." mistake, not a "This is what we think a 20's cloche actually looks like." mistake.
My point exactly.
They're mostly done by fashion/beauty magazines, which is all about selling clothes and makeup. So... yes, they're sponsored. Not secretly, but they are sponsored.
I think its a matter of understanding your area of expertise, Cut wants to make viral videos, nobody there has any real knowledge of historical fashion, or many other topics they make videos about, and it would be great if they hired pros instead of think they know everything and prove repeatedly they don't. They constantly get food wrong on their HiHo channel, it doesn't seem like it would be that hard to bring in someone for the day instead of pretending 5 minutes on google is a professional way to research a topic.
The devil is in the details. Thats how you deferentiate anateurs from professionals.
I didn't want to piss them off...
Too badly.
🤣😂
A random, subtle running thread in Agatha Christie's novels are the comments on hat fashions. Since her works span a large section of the 20th century, it is kinda fun to see how hats (and general fashion) are described over time. One memorable description says that the latest rage is for hats shaped like an upside-down plate, stuck at various angles on the head depending on the current style.
YESSS omfg yess it's pointed out so often if people don't wear hats it's a statement! I remember distinctly in death on the nile Linnet Doyle is described not wearing one
along comes Kenneth branagh and nobody f*cking wears any hats
but hey, we got crop tops and sex on the pyramid, how 1930s of you...
(I hate this movie so much lol)
There is literal proof of what fashion trends happened in history. We have literal patterns from clothing, actual clothing and accessories, paintings, drawings, diagrams. There is little to dispute! So when you point out inconsistencies it is merely making a correction. They should take notes not take offense.
Jamie Joy exactly
Don't forget photographs! ;)
Jamie Joy because they don’t know how to take constructive criticism. If they can’t take it and learn from it then they’ll never improve. Talk about being butthurt cry babies!
Sometimes it's hard to take criticism, especially if you've worked hard and something and have spent a lot of time and money. However, people would be better to listen and learn from experts rather than be upset.
I own some of these items because I had a relationship with both my grandmother and my GREAT grandmother. Many of us are inheritors of this evidence, both photographical and material. Not to mention geneological.
The models are too tall for the 1920s dresses. And they really need to find a historical group to use original dresses instead of using modern dresses that have "shapes" of the vintage looks. These videos sensationalize the periods.
nvaranavage or just... make the dresses longer so they actually FIT
Emilie Smith I mean,if it’s a vintage dress,there’s not much you can do about it. I think they should just hire shorter models. I could be wrong,but wasn’t being shorter part of the fashion ideal in the twenties?
There are groups that re-create vintage clothing from different eras. It seems like it would be difficult to do 100 years without bringing in several historians.
@@user-mv9tt4st9k I don't think you need several historians to ACCEPT THAT WOMEN UNDER 170 CM EXIST!
@@KasumiRINA *Asian women casually walking by*
THEY CHOSE ERAS THAT HAD CAMERAS, MEANING ACTUAL PHOTO EVIDENCE--- AND THEN IGNORED THAT.
"Because I didn't want to piss them off... too badly."
mother has returned
momma.came.to.slay.
ouch your profile pic/icon looks cool thank you
I'm old enough to remember both the 1960's and 1970's, and let me tell you, most people today have no idea how to distinguish the two. They think hippies and psychedelic prints were around in the 1970's, and the 1960's were about nothing but skirts no longer than your hip bone. Drives me nuts. Thanks for these videos, trying to set at least some things straight about fashion history. Seems like actual fashion history gets lost the moment the New Year comes, every year.
Bit late commenting here. I'm old enough to remember what older people wore in the 70s. Blokes with comb overs and sideboards!! Kipper ties etc.young fashion was very different...someone into northern soul music had a look..Oxford bags etc. New wave/punks with narrow ties, straight trousers etc. Mini skirts making a comeback etc...not how it is portrayed on these historical videos, with one style of flairs and Farrah Fawcett hairstyles! The 80s stuff as well...usually on these videos they are well off. 1989 wasnt the same as 1981. I can never understand why they get it so wrong. There are movies, TV shows, documentaries, TV news footage. Pop programmes Etc. No excuse.
People in the US looked different to Britain as well. That has gone, but it did exist.
I’m old enough to remember the 2010’s and that is it 😳
@@lilyshould4602 You'll be surprised how fast that will become the distant past. All the best to you.
Sandra Zarembski thanks 😊 you seem like such a nice 60 something year old I love that wholesome older people are the best have an amazing life I love you ❤️
@@lilyshould4602 Love you back. May your journey be long and happy.
Another problem I kinda had with some of these kinds of videos, they usually show what you would typically see models and film stars of the time wearing and not necessarily what people wore in their day to day lives
I love this kind of videos because is not just roasting, is teaching. I have some characters from the era and I have NO idea how to dress them, so is good to have a video like this with an actual professional explaining (plus, you are hilarious :D).
Me: Youre doing amazing sweetie
Companies: SHES THINKING CRITICALLY SOMEONE GET HER
Markus JP
Totally unrelated, but are you Russian?
@@annamwangi289 no?
I'm from the other hemisphere
@@striggstrix
Excuse my ignorance, but remind me... which hemisphere is that?
@@annamwangi289 western my pal
"Its your meme mum"
I subbed on the spot
Same
Same.
Same
Same
Same
After rewatching this again, I was thinking that I'd love to watch you analysing the clothing in "Queen's Gambit"
Yes please!
"No, oh hell no, baby noo" made me laugh out so hard
My new kink is Karolina saying “no baby no that’s totally wrong”
edit: full quote 8:22 "oh no oh hell no baby no this is veRY WROng"
Yes sign me the f up
when does she say that?
@@GamerGirlLom 8:22
If you turn on captions, it says no homo lmao
lyonclaws baban lol
My thought process during this video:
1) This is very informative.
2) Dressing in the vintage style sounds exhausting...
3) Then again, women’s fashion today also sounds exhausting......
...anyway, great video! LOL
OMG, I'm in stitches on the floor :D
Women's fashion these days aren't exhausting but kinda uncomfortable
@@mr.donaldduckblowstrumpet6053 I'd say very uncomfortable, because me being trans isn't the only reason I want a breast reduction. *ahem*BRAS*ahem*
@@DrBrightIsBack lol, I wear sports bras on a day to day basis, so they aren't that uncomfortable. The only uncomfortable thing for me is probably jeggings, and that's it. Nice to see a Hetalia Fan here (I can't tell if that profile pic is Italy or not lol)
@@mr.donaldduckblowstrumpet6053 It's Italy and i'm autistic with sensory issues.
I'm actually from Poland, but you're the only polish youtuber that I like. Just wanted to say that I appreciate everything you do.
I recently did no more than fifteen minutes worth of research into 1920s fashion and even with that tiny bit of knowledge I could see how bad the 20s dresses were in these videos!
im glad you mentioned no eyeliner in the 40s...almost all modern 1940s makeup tutorials have eyeliner and even winged liner ugh
C M yeah that was news to me, but then all I know about 50s-ish makeup is from modern rockabilly styles which are much less subtle :)
I see that they want to apply the modern sexyness to all the looks. Sexy is something that changes, they look at old photos and be like, that is not sexy. But back in the time, they were (sometimes ofc).
I think that Safiya Nygaard always got nice research material, such as old magazines and not only internet research. She also tells a bit about history. But the parts that don't fit, is because some people do not have a history feeling. Because it's harder to understand changes and differences. And that they have cognitive dissonance, so they don't know how to interpret it.
But I like when people say 'inspired' by, because then, it don't has to be really what they wore, but a inspiration or a modern twist. New fashion used that to make new trends and I think it's really interesting.
Thanks for reading my long comment.
Edgyedgelord Gibson girls are still hella cute.
I think it's more so they arent using a huge budget it's like if I have a 20s day at school I'm not going to go buy a whole authentic outfit makeup shoes makeup etc. I'll just wear something that looks similar and do an outfit with the clothing I have. It seems like they do the same because they're doing countless of these 100 years of bla bla bla and it's already a lot of work just for a quick entertaining video they arent making katherine amounts of money from so they're probably just asking designers for clothes they already have in their possession and it's being thrown together quickly I'm just happy the info given in between is accurate
I would love to see karolina react to safiyas series
I mean if they want to change the style by making it more sexy they should own up to it and stop pretending to be accurate. Cut's videos should have been "hairstyles of the last 100 years... but SEXIER!" Then we would have known that they were not being honest and there would not be an issue.
They always butcher Gibson girl’s hairstyles, like back then those hairstyles were sexy af
Karolina isn't attacking them, she's correcting misinformation. Just because this misinformation isn't as dangerous as like medical misinformation, it should still be corrected
i cackle everytime the 1920s hat comes on screen at 9:59 i’ll never get tired of this video
This video has validated my doubts about the fashion evolution videos.
@Chanel Oberlin I love BTVS, the fashion is pretty cool
Preach it sister. Can't stand ignorance. In my opinion if someone presents an educational video about a subject research and accuracy is absolutely imperative.
Kat Lauren They even get the 90’s and 2000’s wrong. I get frustrated when I think “that isn’t the 2000’s!!!!”. It’s to the point that I just completely ignore these videos now.
she says exactly what anyone who has even a glimmer of an interest in fashion history is thinking when they watch those videos. WHY portray something that is inaccurate???
The hair of different decades is so iconic. You are telling me we should accept the piss poor efforts these videos put out when anyone of us can do a better job after checking out one or two tutorials on vintage hair?
Keep doing good work Karolina!
I LOVE your hair!!! It’s literally goals!
THE PERFECT WOMAN DOESN’T EXIS-
I see what you did there.
Still lookin for her
That meme doesn't work because the world is full of perfect women. I love you fellow ladies!
Her? Pfft. haha. No. She's a monotone doll who's face is all too long and thin. If she had a shred of emotional content in her voice, maybe I could get over her overly pompous makeup and hair routine.
@@Maialeen loving people, gross
I have actually shown videos like these to my grandma, she's 85 and she was having a laughing fit lol pointing out how bad they were
Can we just say how the model at 11:52 is so freaking beautiful
Omg! Karolina, I know you posted this forever ago, but I was watching it again and JUST realized the background soundtrack you have going is a song I’ve been trying to name for ages!! Siri and other softwares don’t ever recognize it. What song is that?!?!? PLEASE💚💚💚
At 19 minutes!
"Show me a single picture from the 1950s of someone looking like this. I'll wait."
LOL I'm dead.
“Show me a single picture of a person from the 1950’s looking like this...........I’ll wait.“
Savage, I love it!
The best!
I'm so glad I stumbled onto your channel. I've been studying fashion most of my life and the glaring inaccuracies in these 100 years videos drives me up the wall.
I’m glad you’re putting content like this out there because misinformation, especially from bigger media companies that most people actually trust to be telling the truth, is such a big problem, especially when it comes to history. Which is sad because the research isn’t difficult to do.
my neck
my back
*shows 100 years of.. video*
*MY ANXIETY ATTACK*
gucci shades F U Ck
Chát séc nước ngoài nước việt kiều nương 100%tag:@1#l7c2 việt 18thời
They never get the 80s right in those videos.
YES. I was in my late teens/early 20s during the 80s and the clothes are not right. We wore separates for work and dance wear for play.
How did they get the 80s so wrong?! They either lived through the decade themselves or they’d know people who did.
M 3 exactly! In my opinion it’s one of the easiest ones to get right
Yes thank you and then the 80s always get bashed or insulted in the Cut videos.
It seems that they never want to go extreme enough with the hair, it’s always flat or under curled.
Those inaccurate fashion history videos make me mad, too, because they seem absolutely enslaved to whatever is considered attractive now, instead of looking at and demonstrating how the things we take for granted today were not the norm in the past. So they totally defeat the purpose (for me) of looking at history, which is to expand your mind about the things we unconsciously take for granted. The same thing happens in costume dramas from different eras.
They should really just say "modern spinoffs of decade styles". Like either go all the way in vintage accuracy or be honest that they wanted to modernize them