Black holes are not considered the source of dark energy, though both remain among the most profound mysteries in astrophysics. Black holes are regions of spacetime with extraordinarily strong gravitational fields, where not even light can escape due to their immense mass. They are formed when massive stars collapse under their own gravity, creating a singularity at their core, surrounded by an event horizon. Dark energy, in contrast, is a theoretical force or energy field believed to be driving the accelerated expansion of the universe. It accounts for roughly 68% of the universe's total energy content, though its exact nature is still unknown. Dark energy is thought to be a property of space itself, pushing galaxies apart at an accelerating rate, rather than being linked to specific objects like black holes. Despite their distinct roles, black holes and dark energy are both intricately tied to the fundamental structure of the universe. Black holes, with their immense gravitational pull, influence the curvature of spacetime, whereas dark energy counters gravity on a cosmic scale, driving the large-scale expansion of the universe. These phenomena operate differently-black holes affect localized regions of spacetime, while dark energy governs the behavior of the universe as a whole. In terms of astrobiology, while black holes may not directly influence life in the way dark energy does on the cosmic scale, they still present essential considerations for the potential existence of life beyond Earth. The environment around black holes, such as in accretion disks or near their event horizons, offers unique conditions that could potentially support exotic forms of life, though these environments would be far too hostile for life as we know it. The study of these extreme environments can deepen our understanding of the conditions under which life might arise or be sustained elsewhere in the universe. Dark energy, though primarily influencing the large-scale structure of the universe, indirectly impacts astrobiology by influencing the rate of expansion of the universe and the eventual fate of galaxies. Its role in determining the ultimate distribution of matter across the cosmos could have long-term implications for the future of habitable planets, the formation of new stars, and the potential for life to exist in other galaxies. As we strive to understand both dark energy and black holes, we are also uncovering more about the conditions that could either foster or hinder the development of life on a cosmic scale.
There are no black holes. In 1939 Einstein wrote - "The essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the Schwarzchild singularities (Schwarzchild was the first to raise the issue of General Relativity predicting singularities) do not exist in physical reality. Although the theory given here treats only clusters (star) whose particles move along circular paths it does seem to be subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will have analogous results. The Schwarzchild singularities do not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light." He was referring to the phenomenon of dilation. Mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. It's what our high school teachers were talking about when they said "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". Time dilation is just one aspect of dilation. Even mass that exists at 75% light speed is partially dilated. It occurs wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass. This includes the centers of very high mass stars and the overwhelming majority of galaxy centers. The mass at the center of our own galaxy is dilated. This means that there is no valid XYZ coordinate we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. In other words that mass is all around us. This is the explanation for dark matter/galaxy rotation curves. The "missing mass" is dilated mass.
Some time ago, black holes were thought to be the force to counter the expansion of the universe. Great video! However I’m not sure how we can have “tracked black holes for billions of years”. We haven’t been around that long!
Thanks to modern telescopes we can see objects that are very far away from us, even billions of light years distant. That mean we see them as they were billions of years ago because light need so much time to transfer information about them to us, hence we can track them from that time and follow their development forward to our time. Cute, isn't it?
No way, Iv actually been thinking about whether black holes could be a source of dark enery, iv even thought that if i ever studied physics at PHD level then my thesis would be about the possibiility of black holes being a source of dark energy, iv even thought that they may also be a source of dark matter itself, even considered whether Hawking radiation could be the dark energy we have been looking for, and that dark matter could be the after product of black holes when they evaporate (wrote this before watching this vid mind you) Edit; So using the rubber band analogy, that would imply that each black hole has a critical mass - the limit to which the rubber band will stretch too - once a black hole has reached that critical mass, it will collapse in on itself releasing the remaining energy, which may help to explain the abundance of dark energy, but that leaves the question as to why supermassive havent reach that critical mass yet, why are they special, this also brings me back to the idea of dark matter also being a product of black holes, Either way, ignoring my clueless ramblings, this makes black holes even more fascinating
If we imagine space-time in two dimensions as a piece of fabric, a black whole could be a place where all the threads are tightly bound, putting stress on the rest of the cloth, and eventually tearing the threads that connect it to the rest of the fabric. The bigger the rips, the less connected everything is, and the easier for the rips to grow. So black holes literally tear apart the fabric of space time, eventually leaving nothing but disconnected black holes separated by vast dark energy.
Agree on the two dimensions and the rip between the two except my hypothesis is the two dimensions are divided based on the their laws of physics. To be more specific the physical 3 D reality we perceive may be overlayed on a higher dimensional foundation containing all the energy and subatomic particles. One dimension is the hardware and the other the software that work in synchrony to run the simulation. And given that everything is made of subatomic particles everything might be superpositioned between these two dimensions. So when a rip occurs between the two layers in the form of a black hole anything that falls in gets stripped of its physical properties at the singularity because thats the cross road seperating the two dimensions and the only thing thats able to pass through is the energy signature thats compatible with the higher dimension. So the expansion I believe is caused by the duplication of the energy that is assimilated into the dark energy upon passing through the black hole.
@NASASpaceNewsagency What if I said I figured out what dark energy is? Dark Energy=Time We all know Archimedes' discovery of fluid displacement, I think the same is true of the Universe; the closer the observer is to the center of mass, the more time dilation applies, and the further away the Universe is on a scale, the more dark energy affects the dimensions of space-time, so the more time passes!
Yes, because dark energy is vacuum energy (which is the exact opposite of inflation) from black holes absorbing spacetime directly causing the vacuum of space. So you can rest assured that the universe is NOT expanding into oblivion for no reason.
In addition to this possibility, there may be suggestions other than dark energy for the mass gain of wandering black holes. I think it can also be done by absorbing lonely rivers of dark matter or by moving matter from a quasar or other black hole through a wormhole under the influence of negative energy of matter.
Black holes can help us explain almost everything, from one hand they are the source of dark energy, but from another hand at the same time they are responsible for dark matter origin... versatile tool to explain everything 💪👍
Well you said that the expansion of the space and time stretches the black holes and they store more energy which gets converted into mass... But how this process creates dark matter?
Of course they are. I've been saying this for the past decade. When institutional physics lets go of causality and the need of fields to make to sense of things then it becomes pretty simple. The dark energy is actually concentrated in the voids where there is less matter. This is because this the place where matter can less disturb the precipitation of dark energy in the universe we live in and observe. The source of this dark energy is black holes. Just not connected via the causality or fields that have indoctrinated by institutions.
I can accept that the expansion of the universe can cause an increase in the mass of black holes. But I fail to see how this in turn CREATES dark energy.
Same. I think they got it all wrong. The black holes do create dark energy but not in the way these scientists think. Bssically the expansion occurs due to the black hole information paradox which is where all the information of the stars that fall into black holes get stripped of their physical properties and its subatomic particles and energy signature undergoe transition passing through the singularity and become assimilated into the dark energy that exists in the hidden dimension around us. So the constant flux of objects falling into black holes is the cause of the expansion and dark energy. Its like putting fruit into a juicer and the extracted juice is going to keep increasing
I knew this was the case always thought that black holes can’t just take massive amounts of Stars and Matter and just push it into an infinitely dense point ! Makes no Sense something will have to give or be pushed into an other universe ! But in Reality Black Holes take Mass and Tears Everything We can Measure from it and Makes it Pure Repulsive Energy That don’t Interfere or interact with Nothing and Makes Space itself out of Matter … Energy is a Form or Matter and Vice versa ! This is The obvious answer I’ve always thought of .. I love Science ! 🎉
At last, the scientists are catching up with the obvious 👍 Now to look at measurements of radio waves to understand how particles eventually become to exist 🧐
Interesting, but if black holes are stretching with the universe then would it not stretch as fast as the universe is expanding? Also, if there is a source within the black hole and it is pulling it back within itself would there not be a point where the black hole would rip? Then again, maybe, that is how these supervoids were created.
Black holes are not considered the source of dark energy. Dark energy is a mysterious form of energy that is thought to permeate all of space and is responsible for the accelerated expansion of the universe. Its nature remains largely unknown, and it is a separate concept from black holes. Black holes are regions in space where gravity is so strong that nothing, not even light, can escape from them. They are formed from the remnants of massive stars after they collapse under their own gravity. While both dark energy and black holes are important components of our understanding of the universe, they operate under different principles and are not directly linked to one another in current cosmological theories. Dark energy is often modeled as a uniform energy density throughout space, while black holes are localized objects with strong gravitational fields. 🤷♂️🙏
Hope you enjoy this 4 parter. A short formatted snippet from the thesis we're working on. Enjoy: ⭕♓⭕🧿🧿🧿🧿🧿🧿🧿🌐🧿 The multiverse is more or less a given. There is more logical evidence for than against, but also empirically - with QM, Double Slit, Virtual Particles, Spontaneous Quark Doubling, etc etc. There are close to an infinite number of universes within this universe and holographic principles alone should be sufficient enough. But regardless - try to entertain this thought: Given an infinite amount of parallel and/or asymmetrical universes, there must be a universe where entropy is reversed. It is a 100% mirrored replica of our universe, but with “time” going backwards. The inhabitants of this universe perceive everything just like us - it is a total carbon copy of our universe. But observed from the outside, that entire universe would flow backwards. Who can say that WE don’t live in such a universe? The only way to even begin to understand that our own entropy is reversed, is to observe it from another universe. From the outside a flashlight would catch the light and the waterfall would flow upwards. How can such dimensionality be understood within the confines of our own entropy? 📀💿📀 📀🌐🌒🌘🌑🌒🌐⭕🌐🌒🌘🌐💿 Diverge Planck - length, time and volume. It serves no fundamental purpose in the Holoverse. Holographic omni-directional manifolds are quantum entangled through the spatial vortex of infinity. Using Planck as "bits" is a null exercise and serve only as fog hiding deeper understanding of the cosmos. This is a volume equivalence with underlying holographic principles as a foundation. The equation has many implications, but one of the most significant is the redefining of how fractionally small space can be, beyond Planck. It scales Planck and presents the Planck units as "endlessly scalable": *v = d - ( t³ c ³)* (Only fully solvable with a combination of algorithms SpheriLog/GeoLog. It is a volume equivalence, cannot be used for malign purposes. But it also cannot be utilised for any malign purposes without the correct algorithmic sequences, hence it is virtually and literally impossible to abuse or weaponize. It is certainly possible to weaponize it, but stability would be counted in zeptoseconds, hence virtually impractical and luckily rendered useless for nefarious reasons.) Holographic principles and spatial fluidity through infinity is beyond the reach of most current linear mathematics and/or simulation. There is no way to create a pathway to a unifying theory without merging macro physics/math with micro. They are not mutually exclusive, quite the opposite. Macro changes can indeed manifest themselves physically. Within Quantum Fields holographic projections can move objects and transform their position, which in turn can be documented. *Protusionistic* quantum effects can indeed transcend into macro fields and do so continually. Even QM and GR/SR cannot be understood more widely without conjoining said theories with spherical/circular mathematics. Even the Lorentz Transformations can't be fully understood within linear mathematics. Linear mathematics are ultimately unsolvable. Transfer the equivalent to spherical conjunctions and we see the emergence of self-solving equations. Holographic principles through infinity are so deeply complex that they are almost self-annihilating, but with a *0.00087Vp/0.38 Zeptoseconds stability* A holographic field cannot collapse, because the fabric is light itself. Put a simplified holographic field through infinity and what do you get? 🐝🌱💦🐬🌒💦🌐⭕🌐💦🌘🐬💦🌱🐝
🧿🧿🧿⭕♓⭕🧿🌐🧿🧿🧿🧿 🌐🌑🌑SR📀HH💿GR🌑🌑🌐 There are issues with linear thinking based on the Hubble constant and reverse inflation. Having a singularity as zero point, even in QM, is problematic because it requires time dilation to be instant. Using holographic principles and implementing applied graduality in Möbian mathematics provides a much smoother transition regarding transfer of energy and entropy. 🌐🌑🌐 IMPORTANT NOTE: Whereas some derivations and concepts might seem counterintuitive using classical thinking, fully understanding HH requires inter/multidimensional, spherical vision. Many of the derivations, math and logic are visual and plastic on an interdimensional level. At certain conjunctions our math breaks down and the only way to peak into principles of infinity or approaching infinity with HH is to use a new standard of math that simply doesn't translate to numbers. Numbers in the universe beyond a certain point are fundamentally null. Classical math breaks down when approaching infinity. 🌒🌐🌘 Understanding that time dilation in relativity also is less drastic locally because of quantum fields, quantum entanglement and holographic principles. Once you approach extreme gravity fields, such as neutron stars and black holes, the normal attributes and effects of gravity is less severe within the local relativistic grid, because the matter that is caught in the gravity field is indeed light itself and gravity is a function of light, so the acceleration experienced by the subject is much more gradual and doesn't necessarily lead to spaghettification, because matter is fundamentally made of light, thus rendering a smoother transition within local fields. There is a possible misconception that black holes are more destructive to local events, because we have implemented a differentiation between matter, light and energy. Proposing that light and motion are the fundamental forces in physics solves several of the empirical findings in our universe - from local events to the very large. IMPORTANT NOTE: There is also a possibility that the laws of nature might change from region to region in the universe. Applying the same unified functions everywhere might not be applicable - based on the observer. Quantum Mechanics combined with holographic principles in conjunction with relativity might produce variations that are stable within physicality as a whole. But they might also produce temporal shift variations that might fluctuate between timelines, not compromising the stability of the system as a whole. Temporal shifts pose little/no threat to quantum fields in macro or micro, because the energy transfer between two or several more points are conserved within holographic principles. Best way to explain is superpositions of quantum fields. But using spherical understanding we might end up with *hyperpositions* in addition, meaning that within multiverse theory and/or paralell physics, we can propose that local variations might occur elsewhere. One might suspect that this could be inherently unstable, but hopefully stability is ensured by *Special* and *General Relativity* in conjunction with *HyperTensored Holigraphy* *QM & QFT* are ultimately functions of *HH* - because all forces, all phenomenons, energy, polarities and particles are fundamentally holographic, thus made of light. *Diverge Planck* and apply *HyperTensorality* to: v=d-(t³c³) If one might observe local effects that seem irreversible to the observer, the stability/instability of said system might return to its relative position in space as they where when the temporal shift gradually occurred. A *Rosen/Einstein* bridge might be folded back onto itself, reestablishing pre-existing physicality relative to the initial motion through spacetime. Quantum Entanglement might provide a reasonable solution to reoccurance of paralell shifts that within time dilation could possibly be "stored" in the same field, but according to the observer. Matter and energy that exist in local time at one point might be shifted and parallaxed with *EPR ≡ ER* Local EPR might occur continously between substances that share the same locally observed quantum field and the energy accessible could possibly be much greater than within relativity, because *e=mc²* isn't truly applicable when dealing with motion on a quantum level. When taking into account that matter in itself consist of light, *e=mc²* is rather moot. Energy is indeed conserved within relativity and as we know we can't break relativity within relativity itself, but when we apply quantum and holographic principles, we could propose that e=cc² The accuracy of this correction must be investigated, but it is strongly suggested through quantum entanglement and holography that the state of energy in the universe is much greater than what relativity proposes. *The factor in relativity = null, but within HH, it equals a dimensional shift in understanding, implying the inter/multidimensionality of HtH* Corrections might be suggested and e=c³c³ might be suggested within HyperTensored spacetime *(HtH)* ***Note that these corrections serve as an introduction to the dimensionality of HH, rather than replacing the causality of: *Relative Tensor Vortices* *(RtV)* Considering sphericality to QE in EPR we might unlock a deeper understanding between gravity, relativity and QM. There might be spherical and macro EPRs that beam QE through quantum fields in absolute zero (the transitional location, not Kelvin) and this might give us access to zero point energy that is much greater than fission and much less complicated than fusion, because the input energy is more or less the device itself. Stability and security is better overall because zero point energy doesn't require usage of unstable materials... This has to be investigated further to test the hypothesis. ***** ⭕ 🌖 🌐 🌔 ⭕: For security reasons & time considerations, our team couldn't disclose the full set of frequencies. But *now* we can release the full set. HH and EAHT/HP are fundamentally *triadic* and the harmonics between these frequencies are deeply set in HtH & SR/GR/HH. 🌘 🌐 ⭕ 🌐 🌒 *-Holographic principles through infinity-* are so deeply complex that they are almost self-annihilating, but with a *0.00087Vp/0.38 zeptosecond* stability (9.61 × 10^(-87) Hertz) 🌈🌐♓🌐🌈 *Fundamental Triharmonic Resonance* (FTR): 6.25 × 10^(-124) Hertz (6.25 Hexyocto Hertz) *HyH* 🌐🌈🧿🌈🌐 6.25 × 10^(-78) Hertz (6.25 Quattuordecillion Hertz) 🧿🌈🌐🌈🧿 6.25 × 10^(-42) Hertz (6.25 Tredecillion Hertz) These frequencies are prevalent through the *Holoverse ≡ Universe* and are rather difficult to manipulate or exploit, because they are rooted in *HtH* and how these interlinked properties behave in the *SR/GR/HH* conjunction. IMPORTANT NOTE: There is never one singular source for any given system. There are always a plurality of systems and subsystems to ensure the stability and security of the spectrum of the laws of nature, physics and life. If there was only one singular source for any given system, it would ultimately lead to instability and degradation. Stability of the laws of nature are almost impossible to compromise, because ultimately light is the very foundation of matter and gravity. Even though quantum mechanics might seem random at certain conjunctions, the configurations are governed by quantum entanglement(s) that principally are benign in nature, because changes to the information/polarity/spherical exchange are secured in relativity that ensures a certain degree of stability. *Complete equilibrium* in any given system is prohibited by the *2nd Law of Thermodynamics* - but it may at the same time be rendered void when entering the quantum realm, where exotic effects might be empirically observed. This is easiest explained by double slit experiments that prove quantum entanglement can not only give parallel energy patterns, but also plural outcomes without loss of energy but possibly provide divergence of energy, thus rendering the 2nd law of TD moot, possibly invalid or maybe incorrect in its current understanding. This can lead us to energy production that leave us with little to no loss of energy. Runaway effects that might go critical such as in fission production are less hazardous, given the correct protocols are in place. *Weaponizing* quantum energy production should be avoided at all cost and is not feasible, because subatomic particles cannot be concentrated in practical mobile weapons. Using such theoretical technology should principally be separated from military science regardless. Civilian and military sciences SHOULD always be maintained - because the usage of such weapons could potentially pose severe hazards to local and macro fields, both ways. How life itself originated is a whole other field and might be discussed both metaphysically and naturally. As I view it, I think it is interesting to entertain several avenues instead of focusing on a singular source. Life itself is pluralistic, so why shouldn't there be several sources without excluding any existing.(?) The universe is fundamentally an *Endless Array of HyperTensored Holographic Projections* or the *EAHT/HP* - conjunction *Information* is fundamentally secure within systems. It cannot vanish and is stored within *SR/GR/QM/HH* 🌑🌑🌑🌑🌖🌒🧿🌘♓🌑🌑🌑🌑 🌈🌐🔵🌑🌈🌘⭕🌒🌈🌑🔵🌐🌈 🌈♓🌐🌈🌒🌘♓🌒🌘🌈🌐🧿🌈 🌈🌐🔵🌑🌈🌘⭕🌒🌈🌑🔵🌐🌈 🌑🌑🌑🌑♓🌒🧿🌘🌔🌑🌑🌑🌑
🧿🧿🧿🧿🌐🧿⭕♓⭕🧿🧿🧿 There are no principal differences between the BH singularity and the BB singularity. Inside a BH singularity/Event Horizon, space/time goes negative from the outside vantage point. There is a common misconception that the singularity is non-dimensional, but that only holds true from the outside. Within the Schwarzschild radius we enter POSITIVE space. It is important to differentiate between the OUTSIDE & INSIDE of the Event Horizon. Space, matter, light and time is REVERSED traversing the boundary. Meaning that the dimensionality of a BH is flipped related to outside vantage point. The dimensionality within a BH is infinite, giving birth/access to a whole new universe. Within a BH, new spacetime is infinite, entering a fractally new universe that in turn gives birth to new matter, new spacetime and in turn new BHs that repeat this process forever. This also solves issues with the Information Paradox. The IP is only relevant from an outside vantage point. The *spatial matrix* within the Schwarzschild radius is exceeding the speed of light, thus nullifying all information that passes the boundary - from an external perspective. Within the negative singularity information is conserved and is holographically stored within the Photon Sphere, where it fundamentally can feed both the outside and inside of the Event Horizon, simultaneously applying Holographic Principles. Applying Möbian principles through *SR/GR/HH* we discover the intrinsic properties of HyperTensored Holigraphic Spacetime - *HtH* This equation proves the HyperTensorality in conjunction with SR/GR. It is one of the many culminations of HH and has several foundational implications in relation to our understanding of fundamental properties in regards to dimensionality, space, light and HtH: v=d-(t³c³) The Universe ≡ Holoverse is fundamentally an *Endless Array of HyperTensored Holographic Projections* or the 💿 *EAHT/HP* 📀 - conjunction *Information* is fundamentally secure within systems. It cannot vanish and is stored within *SR/GR/QM/HH* 🌒🌑🌏🌐🌏🌑🌘 🌘🌐🌑🌏🌑🌐🌒 🌒🌑🌏🌐🌏🌑🌘
🧿🌐🧿🧿🧿🧿🧿🧿🧿⭕♓⭕ Hawking Radiation is fundamentally light. Infinite dimensionality within *HyperTensored Holigraphy* demands *Hypersymmetry* . The *Information Paradox* is non-dimensional and only valid from an outside vantage point. The *Photon Sphere* is feeding the *EH* and the non-dimensional plane outwards with twin *EAHT/HP* - thus nullifying the *IP* . A *BH* isn't filled with matter. It is fundamentally a dimensional object. A black hole is ultimately an infinite entropy that is a dimensional brane. A universe can be an infinite amount of things, some more viable and stable than others. You say there is only one universe, which is irrelevant to infinity. A multiverse model works regardless of model, as long as you account for infinity. A multiverse requires Hypersymmetry and Hypersymmetry requires infinity. One observable universe is in itself proof of a multiverse, because mathematically, metaphysically, existentially & entropically a zero point is an impossibility. *Linear mathematics* ultimately fail and break down approaching infinity, but *spherical/circular* mathematics stay intact and will through certain conditions display self-solving emergent properties. 📀🌑💿 There are no viable models that suggest a universe can spontaneously appear from what has to be a negative *monopole* emerged from a steady state of absolute vacuum. 💿🌑📀 v=d-(t³c³) Solve this and I'll buy you a beer!: 🟣💿🔵🌓🟢🌑🟡🌐🟠🌔🔴 🔴🌐🟠🌗🟡⭕🟢📀🔵🌒🟣 🌑🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑🌑 Good luck! 🙂 🌑🌑🌑♓🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌐🌑🌐🌑🌐🌑 🌑🌑🌐🌐🌐🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌕🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌔🌑🌖🌑🌑 🌑🌓🌑🌑🌑🌗🌑 🌒🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌘 🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑 🌑⭕🌒♓🌘⭕🌑 th-cam.com/video/hTSIn73AOIs/w-d-xo.htmlsi=wNm9JH-oVabubJPj 🌑⭕🌘♓🌒⭕🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑 🌘🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌒 🌑🌗🌑🌑🌑🌓🌑 🌑🌑🌖🌑🌔🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌕🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑
Let's see.... 0° Cartesian coordinance, the smaller the space the higher the capacitance, humongous electromagnetic fields, the stronger the field is the shorter the field is' due to the field collapsing back upon itself, electromagnetic fields can span light years' connecting to or repelling other fields, Dielectricity (magnetism)' don't forget if you know, di or dia is the prefix' meaning in or into) heads in centripetaly clockwise' while the magnetic field also emerges counterclockwise centrifugaly at a 45° tangent to the center of 0° Cartesian coordinance of North or South poles. Do black holes necessarily have to form from the collapse of a dying star which most likely will not collapse evenly or uniformily into 0° coordinance of those spherical shapes? Both hyperboloid (hourglass shape) and torus (doughnut shape) added together make up the total spherical mag. Field with the plane of inertia (0°) between North and South. The magnetic fields of two magnets (slowly) drawing closer together on a ferrocell will show what looks like a third pole show up between them. Who's to say it could not be electromagnetic fields creating black holes when fields touch(new plane of inertia)like bubbles? If you want to see the shape of the magnetic field' look for Mike palazzola video on transparent ferro liquid or T.F.L., also look for Ken Wheeler magnetism' for better understanding of the universe.
@@cyndikarp3368dark energy is the expansion of spreading out of matter in the universe, whereas dark matter is matter that does not interact with light, and so we can only detect by gravity. Dark just refers to the fact that we don't know much about it, so we are in the dark about 95% of the universe.
dark energy is likey x rays. dark matter is likely matter trappedcinside the bh swelling it ! therefore dark energy is out there but all dark matter is Trapped inside the bh..for good.
I’ve been calling this for years. Too bad I’m not a cosmologist & have no way to verify it mathematically or publish & get on the record… But this seems like further evidence to my strong suspicion: The Big Bang is the one “white hole” in our universe- the other side of black holes- the “beginning of time” to their “end of time.” The event horizon which nothing, not even light, can enter back into, because spacetime itself is flowing OUT OF it too fast, to black holes’ event horizon which nothing, not even light, can escape, because spacetime itself is flowing INTO them too fast. And the dynamo created by the singularity at the center, of a universe of matter/energy density flowing INTO black holes & subsequently OUT OF the “white hole”/“Big Bang provides the energy that expands the universe as spacetime flows in on one side & out on the other. I had had the thought that maybe that was the explanation for dark energy, but had no way to really investigate that on my own, & to actually see evidence of that is quite thrilling & fits with my picture very, very well (if there are any cosmologists/physicists who can talk over the maths with me I’d be very interested to examine the technical viability of this kind of picture of the cosmos, & while I don’t have high level calculus, I do have a variety of areas of knowledge/study most STEM experts don’t necessarily know much about, which I’d argue can be useful in brainstorming something like this, good background knowledge across the sciences, & good associative reasoning & big picture/holistic thinking). In this picture, there are two possibilities I’ve been torn between since I was maybe a late teenager, early 20s… it could be a cyclical loop universe, like a sort of 4D spacetime torus, with black holes “punching through” to the other side of the same singularity as the Big Bang of the same universe/iteration of the universe- punching “back” through spacetime, back to the beginning. And there have been a number of proposed cyclical cosmologies, though my impression is that some of them (like CCC, Cyclical Conformal Cosmology) diverge from this kind of toroidal picture significantly in the specifics of how they envision the loop working. On the other hand, I find it similarly possible that a “fecund universe” model could be accurate. It’s consistent with much of the same evidence. Basically, the only difference is that, in a “fecund universe,” there would be an iterative series of universes (potentially infinite variations, but chronologically consecutive to each other, in one long thread; that thread could also hypothetically form a circle, a loop of its own, after some number of iterations, but I have no idea how you’d even make observations that would indicate a loop which would exist outside the bounds of our observable 4D spacetime). At any rate, the idea is the “Big Bangs” would still be “white holes,” the opposite side of black holes… But I suspect that this fecund universe picture would require multiple singularities (which I find somewhat inelegant & less likely than a theory which only requires a single singularity for all black & white holes, but who knows)… Basically black holes in our universe wouldn’t connect back to the Big Bang we observe (back in time from us, beyond the CMB). Instead, on the other side of the singularity from our black holes would be the NEXT universe (or rather, iteration of the one universe)‘s Big Bang/“white hole”, & then their black holes would lead to another iteration, & so on. And likewise, prior to our Big Bang would be a previous universe iteration’s black holes., & so on forwards & backwards. In this picture, I have an open mind about whether each black hole would lead to a distinct Big Bang of a distinct universal timeline, but in fecund universe I think the typical assumption is that all the black holes within our spacetime would lead to the same “next” iteration’s Big Bang, such that there’s only one continuous sequence of iterations of the universe being born & dying, so to speak, in perpetuity. If I had to pick or say I learn slightly more towards a cyclical loop, 4-toroidal universe, looping in the time dimension with the singularity at the center, but I find both surface-plausible.
I posted early last year on TH-cam [ 2023 ] that I thought Black Holes produce Dark Matter to account for the missing 27% of matter needed to make a Galaxy 🌌behave the way it does. I purposely wrote these comments BEFORE I watched the video to prove the Idea came from me. It is more logical that the black holes produce dark matter simply because the black holes were Created From Normal Matter SO I Concluded that Black Holes CONVERT Normal matter into Dark Matter. That is their Function Perhaps they also Produce Dark Energy I don't know BUT I strongly believe they DO produce Dark Matter. S LARS WHALLIN
I wonder how many centuries/millennium it will take for us or for Gaibia BH1 to reach our solar system And Gaibia is 1500 light years away and it's mass is nearly 10 times our sun
That's what they claim, despite the fact that the mysterious objects at the center of galaxies don't attract gravitationally or behave according to any black hole theory.
Shocking: Are Black Holes the Source of Dark Energy? New Evidence! What could there ever be so SHOCKING about it, ans why should I care? In general, I love videos about the universe... but this... SHOCKING !!! and stuff... please no...
I've been saying this all along. My theory is that this Universe is split into two dimensions that mirror each other. One dimension is the physical reality that we perceive the other is a hidden dimension that overlaps the visible universe. Black holes may be rip between the two dimensions. When an object falls into a black hole its physical properties are stripped away and the only thing that passes through the point of the singularity is the energy signature as it undergoes assimilation and joins the rest of the dark energy which we perceive as an expansion of the Universe. And this also addresses the black hole information paradox
We'd have to have a higher level of esoteric and spiritual understanding for black holes. While I do agree that black holes aka planck stars are matter manipulators and bridges to dark matter. How that lines up to other realms is still a mystery? I feel the answer is on earth. Like the librea tar pitts. Animals that get stuck, eventually add to the tar.
Чи можна вважати роздуту чорну діру, яка сповільнила чи зупинила своє обертання, надмассивною чорною дірою? Можливо все навпаки? Як і зорі перед коллапсом, вона нагадує вугільну піч що знаходиться на кисневому голодуванні перед вибухом -"коллапсом" - вдихом кисню. Припустимо, центральна чорна діра спочатку квазару, з плином часу стає центральною чорною дірою еллептичної галактики, і знову з плином часу, поступово, закупорюється сферою із зірок, після умовного коллапсу якої, галактичний елліпсоїд, поступово, перетворюється на енергетично зв'язані між собою сферу балджу, спіральні рукави, джети, галактичний тор спіральної галактики. Роздута чорна діра елліптичної галактики, зупинившись, на мою думку розбиває обидва імпульсно коллапсуючі турбулентні потоки джетів колишнього квазару, на множину "ламінарних" потоків які окремо обертаються. Іншими словами, пройшовши через низку енергетичних еволюційних перетворень, у кванті галактики квазарного типу, у кванті еллептичної галактики центральна чорна діра герметизується сферою майбутьнього балджу спіральної галактики, сфера балджу, після напіврозпаду спіральної галактики, стає сферичною галактикою протонного типу, спіральні рукави створюють кільце галактики нейтронного типу (на рівні мікрочастинок, ВРМ таудейтрон - бозон Хіггса, потім ВРМ дейтрон з загерметизованною сферою майбутьнього протону, майбутьньою сферою балджу у кванті ВРМ дейтерію). Виходячи з цього, роздута, в моєму розумінні "надлегка", центральна чорна діра еллептичної галактики, ледве, можливо опосередковано, але всеж може насичувати "темними" частинками і "темними" енергіями внутрішньо галактичний зоряний простір - квантами батьківського квантового простору, тому що її, як і її материньський галактичний квант, попереду чекає ще низка енерго еволюційних перетворень, її "зорянний час".
Yep, but does the whole dark energy in the universe merge/come from black holes? I mean, are the black holes the only source of dark energy? If so maybe the matter and dark energy in the universe came from the "other" side of a big black hole wormhole-like that absorbed matter including dark energy around itself, shrinking, mashing and just throws it to the "other side", "our universe side". Maybe black holes do not produce dark energy, just, while existing, transferring from "there" to "here". Perhaps the arrival of that huge amount of everything causes the "BIG" explosion (or not) "BANG" It could be more silent than we expected or imagined.
This sounds like a fringe theory. Since nothing can escape from a black hole, not even light or information, it seems far-fetched to suggest that they are causing dark energy. In any case, "dark energy" is really just a place-holder name for the as-yet unidentified cause of the accelerating expansion of the universe.
I think black holes are the source of dark energy because when I carefully checked the image of dark energy it kind of matched the image of black holes.
I have trouble believing anything NASA has come up with since they created the CO2 hoax and then finding out they are more concerned with the trans cross dressers then actual science. I still believe NASA should be disbanded as Elon Musk has proven that government agencies refuse to produce compared to their cost. Elon has been in business for just a fraction of the time NASA has and has contributed almost to the extent of the whole of NASA's input.
Let's see.... 0° Cartesian coordinance, the smaller the space the higher the capacitance, humongous electromagnetic fields, the stronger the field is the shorter the field is' due to the field collapsing back upon itself, electromagnetic fields can span light years' connecting to or repelling other fields, Dielectricity (magnetism)' don't forget if you know, di or dia is the prefix' meaning in or into) heads in centripetaly clockwise' while the magnetic field also emerges counterclockwise centrifugaly at a 45° tangent to the center of 0° Cartesian coordinance of North or South poles. Do black holes necessarily have to form from the collapse of a dying star which most likely will not collapse evenly or uniformily into 0° coordinance of those spherical shapes? Both hyperboloid (hourglass shape) and torus (doughnut shape) added together make up the total spherical mag. Field with the plane of inertia (0°) between North and South. The magnetic fields of two magnets (slowly) drawing closer together on a ferrocell will show what looks like a third pole (black hole?) show up between them. Who's to say it could not be electromagnetic fields creating black holes when fields touch (new plane of inertia) like bubbles? If you want to see the shape of the magnetic field' look for Mike palazzola video on transparent ferro liquid or T.F.L., also look for Ken Wheeler magnetism' for better understanding of the universe.
Black holes are not considered the source of dark energy, though both remain among the most profound mysteries in astrophysics. Black holes are regions of spacetime with extraordinarily strong gravitational fields, where not even light can escape due to their immense mass. They are formed when massive stars collapse under their own gravity, creating a singularity at their core, surrounded by an event horizon. Dark energy, in contrast, is a theoretical force or energy field believed to be driving the accelerated expansion of the universe. It accounts for roughly 68% of the universe's total energy content, though its exact nature is still unknown. Dark energy is thought to be a property of space itself, pushing galaxies apart at an accelerating rate, rather than being linked to specific objects like black holes.
Despite their distinct roles, black holes and dark energy are both intricately tied to the fundamental structure of the universe. Black holes, with their immense gravitational pull, influence the curvature of spacetime, whereas dark energy counters gravity on a cosmic scale, driving the large-scale expansion of the universe. These phenomena operate differently-black holes affect localized regions of spacetime, while dark energy governs the behavior of the universe as a whole. In terms of astrobiology, while black holes may not directly influence life in the way dark energy does on the cosmic scale, they still present essential considerations for the potential existence of life beyond Earth. The environment around black holes, such as in accretion disks or near their event horizons, offers unique conditions that could potentially support exotic forms of life, though these environments would be far too hostile for life as we know it. The study of these extreme environments can deepen our understanding of the conditions under which life might arise or be sustained elsewhere in the universe.
Dark energy, though primarily influencing the large-scale structure of the universe, indirectly impacts astrobiology by influencing the rate of expansion of the universe and the eventual fate of galaxies. Its role in determining the ultimate distribution of matter across the cosmos could have long-term implications for the future of habitable planets, the formation of new stars, and the potential for life to exist in other galaxies. As we strive to understand both dark energy and black holes, we are also uncovering more about the conditions that could either foster or hinder the development of life on a cosmic scale.
Incredible info. Look forward to seeing this topic develop.
There are no black holes. In 1939 Einstein wrote -
"The essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the Schwarzchild singularities (Schwarzchild was the first to raise the issue of General Relativity predicting singularities) do not exist in physical reality. Although the theory given here treats only clusters (star) whose particles move along circular paths it does seem to be subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will have analogous results. The Schwarzchild singularities do not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light."
He was referring to the phenomenon of dilation. Mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. It's what our high school teachers were talking about when they said "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". Time dilation is just one aspect of dilation. Even mass that exists at 75% light speed is partially dilated.
It occurs wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass. This includes the centers of very high mass stars and the overwhelming majority of galaxy centers.
The mass at the center of our own galaxy is dilated. This means that there is no valid XYZ coordinate we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. In other words that mass is all around us.
This is the explanation for dark matter/galaxy rotation curves. The "missing mass" is dilated mass.
@@shawns0762 their challenge next to me, would be to-- Really Define 'infinite'.
Some time ago, black holes were thought to be the force to counter the expansion of the universe. Great video! However I’m not sure how we can have “tracked black holes for billions of years”. We haven’t been around that long!
Thanks to modern telescopes we can see objects that are very far away from us, even billions of light years distant. That mean we see them as they were billions of years ago because light need so much time to transfer information about them to us, hence we can track them from that time and follow their development forward to our time. Cute, isn't it?
No way, Iv actually been thinking about whether black holes could be a source of dark enery, iv even thought that if i ever studied physics at PHD level then my thesis would be about the possibiility of black holes being a source of dark energy, iv even thought that they may also be a source of dark matter itself, even considered whether Hawking radiation could be the dark energy we have been looking for, and that dark matter could be the after product of black holes when they evaporate (wrote this before watching this vid mind you)
Edit; So using the rubber band analogy, that would imply that each black hole has a critical mass - the limit to which the rubber band will stretch too - once a black hole has reached that critical mass, it will collapse in on itself releasing the remaining energy, which may help to explain the abundance of dark energy, but that leaves the question as to why supermassive havent reach that critical mass yet, why are they special, this also brings me back to the idea of dark matter also being a product of black holes,
Either way, ignoring my clueless ramblings, this makes black holes even more fascinating
Thank you! The graphics alone are worth it. This topic is truly absorbing.
Excellent video. Thank you.
Great video makes sense to me. Wish I would had thought of it.
Seems odd that the densest objects are driving a trend toward lowering statistical density by unchecked expansion.
If we imagine space-time in two dimensions as a piece of fabric, a black whole could be a place where all the threads are tightly bound, putting stress on the rest of the cloth, and eventually tearing the threads that connect it to the rest of the fabric. The bigger the rips, the less connected everything is, and the easier for the rips to grow. So black holes literally tear apart the fabric of space time, eventually leaving nothing but disconnected black holes separated by vast dark energy.
Agree on the two dimensions and the rip between the two except my hypothesis is the two dimensions are divided based on the their laws of physics. To be more specific the physical 3 D reality we perceive may be overlayed on a higher dimensional foundation containing all the energy and subatomic particles. One dimension is the hardware and the other the software that work in synchrony to run the simulation. And given that everything is made of subatomic particles everything might be superpositioned between these two dimensions. So when a rip occurs between the two layers in the form of a black hole anything that falls in gets stripped of its physical properties at the singularity because thats the cross road seperating the two dimensions and the only thing thats able to pass through is the energy signature thats compatible with the higher dimension. So the expansion I believe is caused by the duplication of the energy that is assimilated into the dark energy upon passing through the black hole.
Very nice.
@NASASpaceNewsagency What if I said I figured out what dark energy is? Dark Energy=Time
We all know Archimedes' discovery of fluid displacement, I think the same is true of the Universe; the closer the observer is to the center of mass, the more time dilation applies, and the further away the Universe is on a scale, the more dark energy affects the dimensions of space-time, so the more time passes!
Yes, because dark energy is vacuum energy (which is the exact opposite of inflation) from black holes absorbing spacetime directly causing the vacuum of space. So you can rest assured that the universe is NOT expanding into oblivion for no reason.
In addition to this possibility, there may be suggestions other than dark energy for the mass gain of wandering black holes. I think it can also be done by absorbing lonely rivers of dark matter or by moving matter from a quasar or other black hole through a wormhole under the influence of negative energy of matter.
Black holes can help us explain almost everything, from one hand they are the source of dark energy, but from another hand at the same time they are responsible for dark matter origin... versatile tool to explain everything 💪👍
قد تكون الثقوب السوداء العملاقة مدخل الى اكوان متعددة أخرى ❤❤❤❤❤
Well you said that the expansion of the space and time stretches the black holes and they store more energy which gets converted into mass...
But how this process creates dark matter?
Holy shit this is so awesome. This totally changes the way I think about them. Damn I love science.
Of course they are. I've been saying this for the past decade.
When institutional physics lets go of causality and the need of fields to make to sense of things then it becomes pretty simple.
The dark energy is actually concentrated in the voids where there is less matter. This is because this the place where matter can less disturb the precipitation of dark energy in the universe we live in and observe.
The source of this dark energy is black holes. Just not connected via the causality or fields that have indoctrinated by institutions.
I can accept that the expansion of the universe can cause an increase in the mass of black holes. But I fail to see how this in turn CREATES dark energy.
Same. I think they got it all wrong. The black holes do create dark energy but not in the way these scientists think. Bssically the expansion occurs due to the black hole information paradox which is where all the information of the stars that fall into black holes get stripped of their physical properties and its subatomic particles and energy signature undergoe transition passing through the singularity and become assimilated into the dark energy that exists in the hidden dimension around us. So the constant flux of objects falling into black holes is the cause of the expansion and dark energy. Its like putting fruit into a juicer and the extracted juice is going to keep increasing
Black holes just keep getting blamed for everything...
Maybe black holes are the universe's equivalent of a septic tank that keeps overflowing...
I knew this was the case always thought that black holes can’t just take massive amounts of Stars and Matter and just push it into an infinitely dense point ! Makes no Sense something will have to give or be pushed into an other universe ! But in Reality Black Holes take Mass and Tears Everything We can Measure from it and Makes it Pure Repulsive Energy That don’t Interfere or interact with Nothing and Makes Space itself out of Matter … Energy is a Form or Matter and Vice versa ! This is The obvious answer I’ve always thought of .. I love Science ! 🎉
At last, the scientists are catching up with the obvious 👍
Now to look at measurements of radio waves to understand how particles eventually become to exist 🧐
Interesting, but if black holes are stretching with the universe then would it not stretch as fast as the universe is expanding? Also, if there is a source within the black hole and it is pulling it back within itself would there not be a point where the black hole would rip? Then again, maybe, that is how these supervoids were created.
Black holes are not considered the source of dark energy. Dark energy is a mysterious form of energy that is thought to permeate all of space and is responsible for the accelerated expansion of the universe. Its nature remains largely unknown, and it is a separate concept from black holes.
Black holes are regions in space where gravity is so strong that nothing, not even light, can escape from them. They are formed from the remnants of massive stars after they collapse under their own gravity.
While both dark energy and black holes are important components of our understanding of the universe, they operate under different principles and are not directly linked to one another in current cosmological theories. Dark energy is often modeled as a uniform energy density throughout space, while black holes are localized objects with strong gravitational fields. 🤷♂️🙏
Hope you enjoy this 4 parter. A short formatted snippet from the thesis we're working on. Enjoy:
⭕♓⭕🧿🧿🧿🧿🧿🧿🧿🌐🧿
The multiverse is more or less a given. There is more logical evidence for than against, but also empirically - with QM, Double Slit, Virtual Particles, Spontaneous Quark Doubling, etc etc.
There are close to an infinite number of universes within this universe and holographic principles alone should be sufficient enough.
But regardless - try to entertain this thought: Given an infinite amount of parallel and/or asymmetrical universes, there must be a universe where entropy is reversed. It is a 100% mirrored replica of our universe, but with “time” going backwards. The inhabitants of this universe perceive everything just like us - it is a total carbon copy of our universe. But observed from the outside, that entire universe would flow backwards.
Who can say that WE don’t live in such a universe? The only way to even begin to understand that our own entropy is reversed, is to observe it from another universe.
From the outside a flashlight would catch the light and the waterfall would flow upwards. How can such dimensionality be understood within the confines of our own entropy?
📀💿📀
📀🌐🌒🌘🌑🌒🌐⭕🌐🌒🌘🌐💿
Diverge Planck - length, time and volume. It serves no fundamental purpose in the Holoverse. Holographic omni-directional manifolds are quantum entangled through the spatial vortex of infinity. Using Planck as "bits" is a null exercise and serve only as fog hiding deeper understanding of the cosmos.
This is a volume equivalence with underlying holographic principles as a foundation. The equation has many implications, but one of the most significant is the redefining of how fractionally small space can be, beyond Planck. It scales Planck and presents the Planck units as "endlessly scalable":
*v = d - ( t³ c ³)*
(Only fully solvable with a combination of algorithms SpheriLog/GeoLog. It is a volume equivalence, cannot be used for malign purposes. But it also cannot be utilised for any malign purposes without the correct algorithmic sequences, hence it is virtually and literally impossible to abuse or weaponize. It is certainly possible to weaponize it, but stability would be counted in zeptoseconds, hence virtually impractical and luckily rendered useless for nefarious reasons.)
Holographic principles and spatial fluidity through infinity is beyond the reach of most current linear mathematics and/or simulation. There is no way to create a pathway to a unifying theory without merging macro physics/math with micro. They are not mutually exclusive, quite the opposite. Macro changes can indeed manifest themselves physically. Within Quantum Fields holographic projections can move objects and transform their position, which in turn can be documented. *Protusionistic* quantum effects can indeed transcend into macro fields and do so continually.
Even QM and GR/SR cannot be understood more widely without conjoining said theories with spherical/circular mathematics. Even the Lorentz Transformations can't be fully understood within linear mathematics. Linear mathematics are ultimately unsolvable. Transfer the equivalent to spherical conjunctions and we see the emergence of self-solving equations.
Holographic principles through infinity are so deeply complex that they are almost self-annihilating, but with a
*0.00087Vp/0.38 Zeptoseconds stability*
A holographic field cannot collapse, because the fabric is light itself.
Put a simplified holographic field through infinity and what do you get?
🐝🌱💦🐬🌒💦🌐⭕🌐💦🌘🐬💦🌱🐝
🧿🧿🧿⭕♓⭕🧿🌐🧿🧿🧿🧿
🌐🌑🌑SR📀HH💿GR🌑🌑🌐
There are issues with linear thinking based on the Hubble constant and reverse inflation. Having a singularity as zero point, even in QM, is problematic because it requires time dilation to be instant. Using holographic principles and implementing applied graduality in Möbian mathematics provides a much smoother transition regarding transfer of energy and entropy.
🌐🌑🌐
IMPORTANT NOTE: Whereas some derivations and concepts might seem counterintuitive using classical thinking, fully understanding HH requires inter/multidimensional, spherical vision.
Many of the derivations, math and logic are visual and plastic on an interdimensional level. At certain conjunctions our math breaks down and the only way to peak into principles of infinity or approaching infinity with HH is to use a new standard of math that simply doesn't translate to numbers. Numbers in the universe beyond a certain point are fundamentally null. Classical math breaks down when approaching infinity.
🌒🌐🌘
Understanding that time dilation in relativity also is less drastic locally because of quantum fields, quantum entanglement and holographic principles. Once you approach extreme gravity fields, such as neutron stars and black holes, the normal attributes and effects of gravity is less severe within the local relativistic grid, because the matter that is caught in the gravity field is indeed light itself and gravity is a function of light, so the acceleration experienced by the subject is much more gradual and doesn't necessarily lead to spaghettification, because matter is fundamentally made of light, thus rendering a smoother transition within local fields.
There is a possible misconception that black holes are more destructive to local events, because we have implemented a differentiation between matter, light and energy. Proposing that light and motion are the fundamental forces in physics solves several of the empirical findings in our universe - from local events to the very large.
IMPORTANT NOTE: There is also a possibility that the laws of nature might change from region to region in the universe. Applying the same unified functions everywhere might not be applicable - based on the observer. Quantum Mechanics combined with holographic principles in conjunction with relativity might produce variations that are stable within physicality as a whole. But they might also produce temporal shift variations that might fluctuate between timelines, not compromising the stability of the system as a whole.
Temporal shifts pose little/no threat to quantum fields in macro or micro, because the energy transfer between two or several more points are conserved within holographic principles.
Best way to explain is superpositions of quantum fields. But using spherical understanding we might end up with *hyperpositions* in addition, meaning that within multiverse theory and/or paralell physics, we can propose that local variations might occur elsewhere.
One might suspect that this could be inherently unstable, but hopefully stability is ensured by
*Special* and *General Relativity* in conjunction with
*HyperTensored Holigraphy*
*QM & QFT* are ultimately functions of *HH* - because all forces, all phenomenons, energy, polarities and particles are fundamentally holographic, thus made of light.
*Diverge Planck* and apply *HyperTensorality* to:
v=d-(t³c³)
If one might observe local effects that seem irreversible to the observer, the stability/instability of said system might return to its relative position in space as they where when the temporal shift gradually occurred.
A *Rosen/Einstein* bridge might be folded back onto itself, reestablishing pre-existing physicality relative to the initial motion through spacetime. Quantum Entanglement might provide a reasonable solution to reoccurance of paralell shifts that within time dilation could possibly be "stored" in the same field, but according to the observer.
Matter and energy that exist in local time at one point might be shifted and
parallaxed with *EPR ≡ ER*
Local EPR might occur continously between substances that share the same locally observed quantum field and the energy accessible could possibly be much greater than within relativity, because *e=mc²* isn't truly applicable when dealing with motion on a quantum level.
When taking into account that matter in itself consist of light, *e=mc²* is rather moot. Energy is indeed conserved within relativity and as we know we can't break relativity within relativity itself, but when we apply quantum and holographic principles, we could propose that
e=cc²
The accuracy of this correction must be investigated, but it is strongly suggested through quantum entanglement and holography that the state of energy in the universe is much greater than what relativity proposes.
*The factor in relativity = null, but within HH, it equals a dimensional shift in understanding, implying the inter/multidimensionality of HtH*
Corrections might be suggested and
e=c³c³
might be suggested
within HyperTensored spacetime *(HtH)*
***Note that these corrections serve as an introduction to the dimensionality of HH, rather than replacing the causality of:
*Relative Tensor Vortices* *(RtV)*
Considering sphericality to QE in EPR we might unlock a deeper understanding between gravity, relativity and QM. There might be spherical and macro EPRs that beam QE through quantum fields in absolute zero (the transitional location, not Kelvin) and this might give us access to zero point energy that is much greater than fission and much less complicated than fusion, because the input energy is more or less the device itself. Stability and security is better overall because zero point energy doesn't require usage of unstable materials...
This has to be investigated further to test the hypothesis.
*****
⭕ 🌖 🌐 🌔 ⭕: For security reasons & time considerations, our team couldn't disclose the full set of frequencies.
But *now* we can release the full set.
HH and EAHT/HP are fundamentally *triadic* and the harmonics between these frequencies are deeply
set in HtH & SR/GR/HH.
🌘 🌐 ⭕ 🌐 🌒
*-Holographic principles through infinity-* are so deeply complex that they are almost self-annihilating, but with a
*0.00087Vp/0.38 zeptosecond* stability
(9.61 × 10^(-87) Hertz)
🌈🌐♓🌐🌈
*Fundamental Triharmonic Resonance* (FTR):
6.25 × 10^(-124) Hertz
(6.25 Hexyocto Hertz) *HyH*
🌐🌈🧿🌈🌐
6.25 × 10^(-78) Hertz
(6.25 Quattuordecillion Hertz)
🧿🌈🌐🌈🧿
6.25 × 10^(-42) Hertz
(6.25 Tredecillion Hertz)
These frequencies are prevalent through the *Holoverse ≡ Universe* and are rather difficult to manipulate or exploit, because they are rooted in *HtH* and how these interlinked properties behave in the *SR/GR/HH* conjunction.
IMPORTANT NOTE: There is never one singular source for any given system. There are always a plurality of systems and subsystems to ensure the stability and security of the spectrum of the laws of nature, physics and life. If there was only one singular source for any given system, it would ultimately lead to instability and degradation.
Stability of the laws of nature are almost impossible to compromise, because ultimately light is the very foundation of matter and gravity. Even though quantum mechanics might seem random at certain conjunctions, the configurations are governed by quantum entanglement(s) that principally are benign in nature, because changes to the information/polarity/spherical exchange are secured in relativity that ensures a certain degree of stability.
*Complete equilibrium* in any given system is prohibited by the *2nd Law of Thermodynamics* - but it may at the same time be rendered void when entering the quantum realm, where exotic effects might be empirically observed. This is easiest explained by double slit experiments that prove quantum entanglement can not only give parallel energy patterns, but also plural outcomes without loss of energy but possibly provide divergence of energy, thus rendering the 2nd law of TD moot, possibly invalid or maybe incorrect in its current understanding.
This can lead us to energy production that leave us with little to no loss of energy. Runaway effects that might go critical such as in fission production are less hazardous, given the correct protocols are in place.
*Weaponizing* quantum energy production should be avoided at all cost and is not feasible, because subatomic particles cannot be concentrated in practical mobile weapons. Using such theoretical technology should principally be separated from military science regardless. Civilian and military sciences SHOULD always be maintained - because the usage of such weapons could potentially pose severe hazards to local and macro fields, both ways.
How life itself originated is a whole other field and might be discussed both metaphysically and naturally. As I view it, I think it is interesting to entertain several avenues instead of focusing on a singular source. Life itself is pluralistic, so why shouldn't there be several sources without excluding any existing.(?)
The universe is fundamentally an
*Endless Array of HyperTensored Holographic Projections*
or the
*EAHT/HP* - conjunction
*Information* is fundamentally secure within systems. It cannot vanish and is stored within *SR/GR/QM/HH*
🌑🌑🌑🌑🌖🌒🧿🌘♓🌑🌑🌑🌑
🌈🌐🔵🌑🌈🌘⭕🌒🌈🌑🔵🌐🌈
🌈♓🌐🌈🌒🌘♓🌒🌘🌈🌐🧿🌈
🌈🌐🔵🌑🌈🌘⭕🌒🌈🌑🔵🌐🌈
🌑🌑🌑🌑♓🌒🧿🌘🌔🌑🌑🌑🌑
🧿🧿🧿🧿🌐🧿⭕♓⭕🧿🧿🧿
There are no principal differences between the BH singularity and the BB singularity. Inside a BH singularity/Event Horizon, space/time goes negative from the outside vantage point. There is a common misconception that the singularity is non-dimensional, but that only holds true from the outside. Within the Schwarzschild radius we enter POSITIVE space. It is important to differentiate between the OUTSIDE & INSIDE of the Event Horizon. Space, matter, light and time is REVERSED traversing the boundary. Meaning that the dimensionality of a BH is flipped related to outside vantage point. The dimensionality within a BH is infinite, giving birth/access to a whole new universe. Within a BH, new spacetime is infinite, entering a fractally new universe that in turn gives birth to new matter, new spacetime and in turn new BHs that repeat this process forever. This also solves issues with the Information Paradox. The IP is only relevant from an outside vantage point. The *spatial matrix* within the Schwarzschild radius is exceeding the speed of light, thus nullifying all information that passes the boundary - from an external perspective. Within the negative singularity information is conserved and is holographically stored within the Photon Sphere, where it fundamentally can feed both the outside and inside of the Event Horizon, simultaneously applying Holographic Principles. Applying Möbian principles through *SR/GR/HH* we discover the intrinsic properties of HyperTensored Holigraphic Spacetime - *HtH*
This equation proves the HyperTensorality in conjunction with SR/GR. It is one of the many culminations of HH and has several foundational implications in relation to our understanding of fundamental properties in regards to dimensionality, space, light and HtH:
v=d-(t³c³)
The Universe ≡ Holoverse
is fundamentally an
*Endless Array of HyperTensored Holographic Projections*
or the
💿 *EAHT/HP* 📀 - conjunction
*Information* is fundamentally secure within systems. It cannot vanish and is stored within *SR/GR/QM/HH*
🌒🌑🌏🌐🌏🌑🌘
🌘🌐🌑🌏🌑🌐🌒
🌒🌑🌏🌐🌏🌑🌘
🧿🌐🧿🧿🧿🧿🧿🧿🧿⭕♓⭕
Hawking Radiation is fundamentally light. Infinite dimensionality within *HyperTensored Holigraphy* demands *Hypersymmetry* . The *Information Paradox* is non-dimensional and only valid from an outside vantage point. The *Photon Sphere* is feeding the *EH* and the non-dimensional plane outwards with twin *EAHT/HP* - thus nullifying the *IP* .
A *BH* isn't filled with matter. It is fundamentally a dimensional object. A black hole is ultimately an infinite entropy that is a dimensional brane.
A universe can be an infinite amount of things, some more viable and stable than others. You say there is only one universe, which is irrelevant to infinity. A multiverse model works regardless of model, as long as you account for infinity. A multiverse requires Hypersymmetry and Hypersymmetry requires infinity. One observable universe is in itself proof of a multiverse, because mathematically, metaphysically, existentially & entropically a zero point is an impossibility.
*Linear mathematics* ultimately fail and break down approaching infinity, but *spherical/circular* mathematics stay intact and will through certain conditions display self-solving emergent properties.
📀🌑💿
There are no viable models that suggest a universe can spontaneously appear from what has to be a negative *monopole* emerged from a steady state of absolute vacuum.
💿🌑📀
v=d-(t³c³)
Solve this and I'll buy you a beer!:
🟣💿🔵🌓🟢🌑🟡🌐🟠🌔🔴
🔴🌐🟠🌗🟡⭕🟢📀🔵🌒🟣
🌑🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑🌑
Good luck! 🙂
🌑🌑🌑♓🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌐🌑🌐🌑🌐🌑
🌑🌑🌐🌐🌐🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌕🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌔🌑🌖🌑🌑
🌑🌓🌑🌑🌑🌗🌑
🌒🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌘
🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑
🌑⭕🌒♓🌘⭕🌑
th-cam.com/video/hTSIn73AOIs/w-d-xo.htmlsi=wNm9JH-oVabubJPj
🌑⭕🌘♓🌒⭕🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑
🌘🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌒
🌑🌗🌑🌑🌑🌓🌑
🌑🌑🌖🌑🌔🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌕🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑
Maybe it produces both dark matter and energy, possibly the only 2 parts of mater & energy that can’t be absorbed by a black hole
Let's see.... 0° Cartesian coordinance, the smaller the space the higher the capacitance, humongous electromagnetic fields, the stronger the field is the shorter the field is' due to the field collapsing back upon itself, electromagnetic fields can span light years' connecting to or repelling other fields, Dielectricity (magnetism)' don't forget if you know, di or dia is the prefix' meaning in or into) heads in centripetaly clockwise' while the magnetic field also emerges counterclockwise centrifugaly at a 45° tangent to the center of 0° Cartesian coordinance of North or South poles. Do black holes necessarily have to form from the collapse of a dying star which most likely will not collapse evenly or uniformily into 0° coordinance of those spherical shapes? Both hyperboloid (hourglass shape) and torus (doughnut shape) added together make up the total spherical mag. Field with the plane of inertia (0°) between North and South. The magnetic fields of two magnets (slowly) drawing closer together on a ferrocell will show what looks like a third pole show up between them. Who's to say it could not be electromagnetic fields creating black holes when fields touch(new plane of inertia)like bubbles? If you want to see the shape of the magnetic field' look for Mike palazzola video on transparent ferro liquid or T.F.L., also look for Ken Wheeler magnetism' for better understanding of the universe.
I knew there was a good chance of Dark Matter coming from Black Holes.
Dark matter and dark energy are two different things.
@@Taparoo2 Thanks. Please explain.
@@cyndikarp3368dark energy is the expansion of spreading out of matter in the universe, whereas dark matter is matter that does not interact with light, and so we can only detect by gravity. Dark just refers to the fact that we don't know much about it, so we are in the dark about 95% of the universe.
dark energy is likey x rays. dark matter is likely matter trappedcinside the bh swelling it ! therefore dark energy is out there but all dark matter is Trapped inside the bh..for good.
Yeah two different things...
I’ve been calling this for years. Too bad I’m not a cosmologist & have no way to verify it mathematically or publish & get on the record… But this seems like further evidence to my strong suspicion:
The Big Bang is the one “white hole” in our universe- the other side of black holes- the “beginning of time” to their “end of time.” The event horizon which nothing, not even light, can enter back into, because spacetime itself is flowing OUT OF it too fast, to black holes’ event horizon which nothing, not even light, can escape, because spacetime itself is flowing INTO them too fast. And the dynamo created by the singularity at the center, of a universe of matter/energy density flowing INTO black holes & subsequently OUT OF the “white hole”/“Big Bang provides the energy that expands the universe as spacetime flows in on one side & out on the other. I had had the thought that maybe that was the explanation for dark energy, but had no way to really investigate that on my own, & to actually see evidence of that is quite thrilling & fits with my picture very, very well (if there are any cosmologists/physicists who can talk over the maths with me I’d be very interested to examine the technical viability of this kind of picture of the cosmos, & while I don’t have high level calculus, I do have a variety of areas of knowledge/study most STEM experts don’t necessarily know much about, which I’d argue can be useful in brainstorming something like this, good background knowledge across the sciences, & good associative reasoning & big picture/holistic thinking).
In this picture, there are two possibilities I’ve been torn between since I was maybe a late teenager, early 20s… it could be a cyclical loop universe, like a sort of 4D spacetime torus, with black holes “punching through” to the other side of the same singularity as the Big Bang of the same universe/iteration of the universe- punching “back” through spacetime, back to the beginning. And there have been a number of proposed cyclical cosmologies, though my impression is that some of them (like CCC, Cyclical Conformal Cosmology) diverge from this kind of toroidal picture significantly in the specifics of how they envision the loop working.
On the other hand, I find it similarly possible that a “fecund universe” model could be accurate. It’s consistent with much of the same evidence. Basically, the only difference is that, in a “fecund universe,” there would be an iterative series of universes (potentially infinite variations, but chronologically consecutive to each other, in one long thread; that thread could also hypothetically form a circle, a loop of its own, after some number of iterations, but I have no idea how you’d even make observations that would indicate a loop which would exist outside the bounds of our observable 4D spacetime). At any rate, the idea is the “Big Bangs” would still be “white holes,” the opposite side of black holes… But I suspect that this fecund universe picture would require multiple singularities (which I find somewhat inelegant & less likely than a theory which only requires a single singularity for all black & white holes, but who knows)… Basically black holes in our universe wouldn’t connect back to the Big Bang we observe (back in time from us, beyond the CMB). Instead, on the other side of the singularity from our black holes would be the NEXT universe (or rather, iteration of the one universe)‘s Big Bang/“white hole”, & then their black holes would lead to another iteration, & so on. And likewise, prior to our Big Bang would be a previous universe iteration’s black holes., & so on forwards & backwards. In this picture, I have an open mind about whether each black hole would lead to a distinct Big Bang of a distinct universal timeline, but in fecund universe I think the typical assumption is that all the black holes within our spacetime would lead to the same “next” iteration’s Big Bang, such that there’s only one continuous sequence of iterations of the universe being born & dying, so to speak, in perpetuity. If I had to pick or say I learn slightly more towards a cyclical loop, 4-toroidal universe, looping in the time dimension with the singularity at the center, but I find both surface-plausible.
Imagine: Black Holes 'coupling' with the largest black hole; Cosmos!! The largest black hole is the source of Dark Energy!! Cosmos IS a Black Hole!!
I posted early last year on TH-cam [ 2023 ] that I thought Black Holes produce Dark Matter to account for the missing 27% of matter needed to make a Galaxy 🌌behave the way it does. I purposely wrote these comments BEFORE I watched the video to prove the Idea came from me. It is more logical that the black holes produce dark matter simply because the black holes were Created From Normal Matter SO I Concluded that Black Holes CONVERT Normal matter into Dark Matter. That is their Function Perhaps they also Produce Dark Energy I don't know BUT I strongly believe they DO produce Dark Matter. S LARS WHALLIN
I wonder how many centuries/millennium it will take for us or for
Gaibia BH1 to reach our solar system
And Gaibia is 1500 light years away and it's mass is nearly 10 times our sun
Partially? Some filaments leaving the Sun maje me wonder if there's one in every Sun its what's the Kickstarter.
Yes. It took you so long to realize that?
70% of the mass , evades. Being g identified ... still ; kinda funny...I want 70% of the tuition I paid...tossed into a black hole , at least
isn't supposed that black holes at the center of a galaxy sustain the whole thing together?
Yes
The two don’t contradict but confirm each other.
That's what they claim, despite the fact that the mysterious objects at the center of galaxies don't attract gravitationally or behave according to any black hole theory.
Shocking: Are Black Holes the Source of Dark Energy? New Evidence!
What could there ever be so SHOCKING about it, ans why should I care?
In general, I love videos about the universe... but this... SHOCKING !!! and stuff... please no...
I've been saying this all along. My theory is that this Universe is split into two dimensions that mirror each other. One dimension is the physical reality that we perceive the other is a hidden dimension that overlaps the visible universe. Black holes may be rip between the two dimensions. When an object falls into a black hole its physical properties are stripped away and the only thing that passes through the point of the singularity is the energy signature as it undergoes assimilation and joins the rest of the dark energy which we perceive as an expansion of the Universe. And this also addresses the black hole information paradox
We'd have to have a higher level of esoteric and spiritual understanding for black holes.
While I do agree that black holes aka planck stars are matter manipulators and bridges to dark matter. How that lines up to other realms is still a mystery?
I feel the answer is on earth. Like the librea tar pitts. Animals that get stuck, eventually add to the tar.
I wonder where ya got this one.. hmm
ブラックホールは人間が認識できる光さえ飲み込むのだから当然だ。
Чи можна вважати роздуту чорну діру, яка сповільнила чи зупинила своє обертання, надмассивною чорною дірою? Можливо все навпаки? Як і зорі перед коллапсом, вона нагадує вугільну піч що знаходиться на кисневому голодуванні перед вибухом -"коллапсом" - вдихом кисню. Припустимо, центральна чорна діра спочатку квазару, з плином часу стає центральною чорною дірою еллептичної галактики, і знову з плином часу, поступово, закупорюється сферою із зірок, після умовного коллапсу якої, галактичний елліпсоїд, поступово, перетворюється на енергетично зв'язані між собою сферу балджу, спіральні рукави, джети, галактичний тор спіральної галактики. Роздута чорна діра елліптичної галактики, зупинившись, на мою думку розбиває обидва імпульсно коллапсуючі турбулентні потоки джетів колишнього квазару, на множину "ламінарних" потоків які окремо обертаються. Іншими словами, пройшовши через низку енергетичних еволюційних перетворень, у кванті галактики квазарного типу, у кванті еллептичної галактики центральна чорна діра герметизується сферою майбутьнього балджу спіральної галактики, сфера балджу, після напіврозпаду спіральної галактики, стає сферичною галактикою протонного типу, спіральні рукави створюють кільце галактики нейтронного типу (на рівні мікрочастинок, ВРМ таудейтрон - бозон Хіггса, потім ВРМ дейтрон з загерметизованною сферою майбутьнього протону, майбутьньою сферою балджу у кванті ВРМ дейтерію). Виходячи з цього, роздута, в моєму розумінні "надлегка", центральна чорна діра еллептичної галактики, ледве, можливо опосередковано, але всеж може насичувати "темними" частинками і "темними" енергіями внутрішньо галактичний зоряний простір - квантами батьківського квантового простору, тому що її, як і її материньський галактичний квант, попереду чекає ще низка енерго еволюційних перетворень, її "зорянний час".
Everything has a Singularitie Even us & them. Relative 2@ll atom heart mother?
Tear a hole in space and in pours the gravity.
The law of conservation light matter in dark matter out.
No.
Your right. It could make a big difference in the future of makeup. 😂
Yep, but does the whole dark energy in the universe merge/come from black holes? I mean, are the black holes the only source of dark energy? If so maybe the matter and dark energy in the universe came from the "other" side of a big black hole wormhole-like
that absorbed matter including dark energy around itself, shrinking, mashing and just throws it to the "other side", "our universe side". Maybe black holes do not produce dark energy, just, while existing, transferring from "there" to "here". Perhaps the arrival of that huge amount of everything causes the "BIG" explosion (or not) "BANG" It could be more silent than we expected or imagined.
bh growth and universe expansion are not connected
The JWST data shows the universe isn't expanding.
Depsite them ignoring it.
BHs aren't physically real either. Neutron stars can exist but that's it.
@@paulthomas963but one would could still go beyond assuming that a neutron star out there is nature's limit of collapsing matter.
This sounds like a fringe theory. Since nothing can escape from a black hole, not even light or information, it seems far-fetched to suggest that they are causing dark energy. In any case, "dark energy" is really just a place-holder name for the as-yet unidentified cause of the accelerating expansion of the universe.
In fact, it sounds like word salad.
How can the expansion of the universe be accelerating if JWST data says it's not expanding at all?
@@paulthomas963
JWST data does NOT say that the universe isn't expanding. No idea where you got the idea that it isn't. Or that JWST said it wasn't.
I think black holes are the source of dark energy because when I carefully checked the image of dark energy it kind of matched the image of black holes.
I have trouble believing anything NASA has come up with since they created the CO2 hoax and then finding out they are more concerned with the trans cross dressers then actual science. I still believe NASA should be disbanded as Elon Musk has proven that government agencies refuse to produce compared to their cost. Elon has been in business for just a fraction of the time NASA has and has contributed almost to the extent of the whole of NASA's input.
Let's see.... 0° Cartesian coordinance, the smaller the space the higher the capacitance, humongous electromagnetic fields, the stronger the field is the shorter the field is' due to the field collapsing back upon itself, electromagnetic fields can span light years' connecting to or repelling other fields, Dielectricity (magnetism)' don't forget if you know, di or dia is the prefix' meaning in or into) heads in centripetaly clockwise' while the magnetic field also emerges counterclockwise centrifugaly at a 45° tangent to the center of 0° Cartesian coordinance of North or South poles. Do black holes necessarily have to form from the collapse of a dying star which most likely will not collapse evenly or uniformily into 0° coordinance of those spherical shapes? Both hyperboloid (hourglass shape) and torus (doughnut shape) added together make up the total spherical mag. Field with the plane of inertia (0°) between North and South. The magnetic fields of two magnets (slowly) drawing closer together on a ferrocell will show what looks like a third pole (black hole?) show up between them. Who's to say it could not be electromagnetic fields creating black holes when fields touch (new plane of inertia) like bubbles? If you want to see the shape of the magnetic field' look for Mike palazzola video on transparent ferro liquid or T.F.L., also look for Ken Wheeler magnetism' for better understanding of the universe.