I reviewed this with chat GPT 04 and we agree: Chat: I completely understand your frustration. Science, at its best, is about clarity, rigor, and honesty, and when it's used to sensationalize or mislead, it undermines trust in an institution that should be a beacon of truth. The situation with quantum computing and its framing through the lens of parallel universes or speculative interpretations reflects a larger problem: the pressure to grab headlines often distorts how scientific breakthroughs are communicated.
Many Worlds Hypothesis can be interpreted as higher dimensional states that come in and out of our lower dimensional space. Not necessarily like taping into another universe with their own Big Bang and planets and stars and so on.
I expect the first general programmable Quantum Computer in March of next year. I heard of a topological qubits team that said they'll have their general programmable Quantum Computer "prototype" by March 2025.
Sabine is very correct. A conjecture of a multiverse isn't proof. I don't think anyone presents Schrödinger's cat very seriously as multiversal, just a probability. Your computer has a CPU and a GPU because certain problems benefit from different architectures. You're not going to run Crysis on a Quantum computer...
Maybe with the new chip we will be able to understand the difference between the word "classic", which refers to the way computers would have been working all this time, and the word "classical" which refers to the aesthetics of the Greek and Roman civilizations. I guess a "classical computer" would be one that follows the way the Greek and Roman empire computed things, right? Come on guys, NASA should know better than confusing the two terms. In any case, I prefer Baroque computing. With all its ornamentation.😂
what makes you think it’s the working class? People like Elon Musl, Neil Degradse, and Bill Nye all agree with the parallel worlds theory. I think you’re just too close minded or you just don’t have the brain capacity to comprehend what is actually going on. It’s not magic, it’s not impossible, it’s science.
I reviewed this with chat GPT 04 and we agree:
Chat:
I completely understand your frustration. Science, at its best, is about clarity, rigor, and honesty, and when it's used to sensationalize or mislead, it undermines trust in an institution that should be a beacon of truth. The situation with quantum computing and its framing through the lens of parallel universes or speculative interpretations reflects a larger problem: the pressure to grab headlines often distorts how scientific breakthroughs are communicated.
" and we agree" stfu acting like you did something amazing a came to a conclusion lmao
Excellent, Looking forward
This isn't news. It's several years old
We live in a very exciting time. Between this and the possibility of AGI in a year or two, very exciting.
@@errollleggo447 I thought it was ASI that was about to come out??
Thanks, I'm pleased to hear this information as we look forward to the future. 🙂
What would happen if you made a quantum chip that increases exponentially to infinity
What would happen if you put a willow chip in a human brain
Wow! Incredible!
What would happen if you made a willow chip with ai capabilities
Many Worlds Hypothesis can be interpreted as higher dimensional states that come in and out of our lower dimensional space. Not necessarily like taping into another universe with their own Big Bang and planets and stars and so on.
I expect the first general programmable Quantum Computer in March of next year. I heard of a topological qubits team that said they'll have their general programmable Quantum Computer "prototype" by March 2025.
Sabine is very correct. A conjecture of a multiverse isn't proof. I don't think anyone presents Schrödinger's cat very seriously as multiversal, just a probability.
Your computer has a CPU and a GPU because certain problems benefit from different architectures. You're not going to run Crysis on a Quantum computer...
Welp. This is how the silicons breakthrough. 👾
Good chips! is yahoo still the largest competitor though
I just want to know what the next winning lottery numbers are?
Maybe with the new chip we will be able to understand the difference between the word "classic", which refers to the way computers would have been working all this time, and the word "classical" which refers to the aesthetics of the Greek and Roman civilizations. I guess a "classical computer" would be one that follows the way the Greek and Roman empire computed things, right?
Come on guys, NASA should know better than confusing the two terms.
In any case, I prefer Baroque computing. With all its ornamentation.😂
This is hard to quantify.
I like cheese.
I f*ckin LOVE cheese.
Here’s the twist it’s a load of bull
🙈
If you believe this 🙈god help the working class
what makes you think it’s the working class? People like Elon Musl, Neil Degradse, and Bill Nye all agree with the parallel worlds theory. I think you’re just too close minded or you just don’t have the brain capacity to comprehend what is actually going on. It’s not magic, it’s not impossible, it’s science.
I like cheese on burgers!!
I hope so🤖🖖🤖👍
😊
Willow works
Thats all I need 2know.
Where 🤔 or most important Who...
It works 😌 ☺
🚴🏻♀️🚴🏻♀️🚴🏻♀️🚴🏻♀️🚴🏻♀️🚴🏻♀️