in space, gases, liquids & solids maintain the fluid motion portion of fluid dynamics traveling through the wide varying temperature differentials rapidly cycling through each state creating ocean like flow characteristics in the vacuum of space!
I’ve heard it called an “un-nova” before, but I don’t know if that’s any kind of official term or just one of the terms used for them- I like the sound of it, though
@@Wesley_H it doesn't imply a subnova ur takin the word supernovae too far as it's just a word to show the difference between nova meaning new and supernova meaning a bigger new star. I see why u've come to that process but it's wrong if I may be so bold.
Super-interesting. But I would really love to know why the brightening, then the *gradual* decrease into nothingness. If we’ve learned something about massive star supernovae, it’s that they are the end of ever-accelerating process of fusion-contraction-fusion of previous ashes-contraction..., till you reach the stop of fusion around Nickel. Then the core collapses in the blink of an eye, releasing an humungous amount of gravitational energy that shred the external part of the star, while the core collapses into a neutron star or a black hole, depending on its mass. Each stage of fusion takes much less than the previous one. What’s going on here?
As long as said lifeforms are not dependent on any kind of photosynthetic processes to survive, they should be just fine. Contrary to popular belief, when a star shrinks down and collapses into a black hole the gravitational forces of the star system don't change. The only thing that changes is the star's size, density, and lack of light from the host star.
@@CarlAyers-x8h Stars capable of becoming supernovae or whose core can collapse into a black hole are very short-lived stars. In terms of stars, the more massive the star, the shorter its lifespan. Typically, such stars only last a few million years. It is thus highly improbable that complex life could evolve during that star’s phase where its core is fusing hydrogen. After that star leaves the main sequence (phase where its core fuses hydrogen), it usually begins expanding into a hypergiant phase, engulfing many planets in its own stellar system, before ending in supernova or, in this star’s case, core collapse into a black hole. So it is highly unlikely that any complex life had evolved on any planet orbiting this star (if indeed there had been any planets that had had time to develop). Our Sun is a medium sized star, so it doesn’t have enough mass to end in a supernova or core collapse into a black hole. Our Sun is about half-way through its main-sequence stage, when it is still fusing hydrogen in its core, and it is about 5 billion years old, much older than that star in Andromeda. On Earth, complex life only really evolved within the last 500 million years, again, long before this star in Andromeda formed, but about 4.5 billion years after our Sun formed, and 4 billion years after Earth formed. So if the history of life on Earth is typical, then there simply isn’t enough time for life to evolve on a planet orbiting a massive star. Of course, because we only have Earth itself as a guide, we have no way of knowing if it requires billions of years for life to become complex (more than single celled organisms, such as bacteria). The only other danger for life is living on a planet whose star is within ten light years of a massive star. Because if that massive star should go supernova, the release of energy could strip away protective layers of the habitable planet’s atmosphere (the ozone layer), and that would expose the organisms on the planet to deadly radiation. However, because of the core collapse of this star, without a supernova, any neighboring inhabited planets orbiting stars near the massive star should be fine. As for Earth itself, the nearest star that could go supernova relatively soon is Betelgeuse, which is safely 600 light years away, so it won’t have any adverse effects on Earth, or on life on Earth.
like the temperature differential of both the front side and the back side of the moon facing the sun(respectively) Hey, did the invention of freeze dried coffee happen on one of the Apollo capsules?!?!
you have to look really hard to see a black dwarf perhaps a vessel for black energy, so when that particular type of stars goes into a black hole dependent on the type & level of black energy, or gravity determines the end, explosion vs implosion, or simply extinguishing the star. nothing in space, is just sitting there! everything is moving & everything that you CAN see is moving in a relative trajectory & velocity so it all appears to be stationary.
Or swallowed by a Dyson Sphere? I get it, it's theoretical but makes complete sense, like next level to solar panels. I wonder how far we can look back with Andromeda?
IMPLOSION, or compressed till extinguished creating a black dwarf, NOT a black hole not all black holes are alike, some rip and tear while others crush, compress, implode & squish!
OMG!!! This doesn't change everything, but almost everything....Not a bang, forms a black hole and all matter and energy is eaten by it? How could it be? To me it's almost like saying the black hole eats itself or the energy and matter that keeps it put, a bit confusing coz our old notion about stars dimming compressed by gravity and booms..
Awesome. A very interesting and informative video.
Very well explained!
in space, gases, liquids & solids maintain the fluid motion portion of fluid dynamics traveling through the wide varying temperature differentials rapidly cycling through each state creating ocean like flow characteristics in the vacuum of space!
We all know about a nova. But the existence of a supernova… implies the existence of a subnova.
I’ve heard it called an “un-nova” before, but I don’t know if that’s any kind of official term or just one of the terms used for them- I like the sound of it, though
@@Wesley_H it doesn't imply a subnova ur takin the word supernovae too far as it's just a word to show the difference between nova meaning new and supernova meaning a bigger new star. I see why u've come to that process but it's wrong if I may be so bold.
@@SimonMcGrath-o8jk Or… _OR_ … and hear me out on this… It was a just some fun little wordplay, and you’ve just r/whooooshed yourself into oblivion.
@@Wesley_HI apologise for not 'gettin it'
Nah. Just a regular ol' nova.
If it became a black hole, then it didn't "disappear" now , did it.
@@SlimFatboy-m9y , after I read your comment I think nothing in this universe are completely disappear, nothing.
How many years a black hole while formed after supernova?
Super-interesting. But I would really love to know why the brightening, then the *gradual* decrease into nothingness. If we’ve learned something about massive star supernovae, it’s that they are the end of ever-accelerating process of fusion-contraction-fusion of previous ashes-contraction..., till you reach the stop of fusion around Nickel. Then the core collapses in the blink of an eye, releasing an humungous amount of gravitational energy that shred the external part of the star, while the core collapses into a neutron star or a black hole, depending on its mass.
Each stage of fusion takes much less than the previous one. What’s going on here?
I hope there were no planets with living beings on it close by, that are not dead or in trouble.
As long as said lifeforms are not dependent on any kind of photosynthetic processes to survive, they should be just fine. Contrary to popular belief, when a star shrinks down and collapses into a black hole the gravitational forces of the star system don't change. The only thing that changes is the star's size, density, and lack of light from the host star.
@@CarlAyers-x8h Stars capable of becoming supernovae or whose core can collapse into a black hole are very short-lived stars. In terms of stars, the more massive the star, the shorter its lifespan. Typically, such stars only last a few million years. It is thus highly improbable that complex life could evolve during that star’s phase where its core is fusing hydrogen. After that star leaves the main sequence (phase where its core fuses hydrogen), it usually begins expanding into a hypergiant phase, engulfing many planets in its own stellar system, before ending in supernova or, in this star’s case, core collapse into a black hole.
So it is highly unlikely that any complex life had evolved on any planet orbiting this star (if indeed there had been any planets that had had time to develop). Our Sun is a medium sized star, so it doesn’t have enough mass to end in a supernova or core collapse into a black hole. Our Sun is about half-way through its main-sequence stage, when it is still fusing hydrogen in its core, and it is about 5 billion years old, much older than that star in Andromeda. On Earth, complex life only really evolved within the last 500 million years, again, long before this star in Andromeda formed, but about 4.5 billion years after our Sun formed, and 4 billion years after Earth formed. So if the history of life on Earth is typical, then there simply isn’t enough time for life to evolve on a planet orbiting a massive star.
Of course, because we only have Earth itself as a guide, we have no way of knowing if it requires billions of years for life to become complex (more than single celled organisms, such as bacteria).
The only other danger for life is living on a planet whose star is within ten light years of a massive star. Because if that massive star should go supernova, the release of energy could strip away protective layers of the habitable planet’s atmosphere (the ozone layer), and that would expose the organisms on the planet to deadly radiation. However, because of the core collapse of this star, without a supernova, any neighboring inhabited planets orbiting stars near the massive star should be fine.
As for Earth itself, the nearest star that could go supernova relatively soon is Betelgeuse, which is safely 600 light years away, so it won’t have any adverse effects on Earth, or on life on Earth.
like the temperature differential of both the front side and the back side of the moon facing the sun(respectively)
Hey, did the invention of freeze dried coffee happen on one of the Apollo capsules?!?!
Thx for information I am from India
"So what? Being from India doesn’t make you special."
@@hellobollywood3530bs you leave him
you have to look really hard to see a black dwarf perhaps a vessel for black energy, so when that particular type of stars goes into a black hole dependent on the type & level of black energy, or gravity determines the end, explosion vs implosion, or simply extinguishing the star.
nothing in space, is just sitting there! everything is moving & everything that you CAN see is moving in a relative trajectory & velocity so it all appears to be stationary.
Or swallowed by a Dyson Sphere? I get it, it's theoretical but makes complete sense, like next level to solar panels. I wonder how far we can look back with Andromeda?
The light we C of a super Nova; is that a brief glimpse of Dark matter & energy??
? What if a primordial black hole was eating away at the center of the star ?
Something that started out with the mass Jupiter.
But where did all the gas go .
I suspect that as there appeared to be no explosion, the gasses were pulled into the black hole as it collapsed.
@@playboyprada314 into the black hole
@Warpman608 why u can't see it
@@playboyprada314 because the event horizon is a thin layer of Dark Matter
My guess is that the star has been encapsulated by a Dyson sphere overnight, made by the local Smurfs!
Unless everything was prefabricated, moved to location and assembled overnight I don't think a dyson sphere is what happened here
@ can you prove it?😝
Failed Supernova A Star Disappeared in Andromeda and become in Black Holes ...
Some of these dying star. Are like a Faint heart beat?
If sun became blackhole and m31 did'nt what will happen☠️
IMPLOSION, or compressed till extinguished creating a black dwarf, NOT a black hole not all black holes are alike, some rip and tear while others crush, compress, implode & squish!
Unbelievable Quasar Killed All Galaxies Within 16 Million Light Years
@
OMG!!! This doesn't change everything, but almost everything....Not a bang, forms a black hole and all matter and energy is eaten by it? How could it be? To me it's almost like saying the black hole eats itself or the energy and matter that keeps it put, a bit confusing coz our old notion about stars dimming compressed by gravity and booms..