Actually, I wrote and published several books before the JWST was launched and wrote how the telescope would not find young, small galaxies at the edge of the observable universe. I said the telescope would discover old, fully grown galaxies as far as it's able to see, even further than the light distance of 13.8 billion light years away. I said the galaxies at a light distance of 14 billion light years away would be larger than our own Milky Way galaxy. In 2004 I discovered a glitch in Einstein's general theory of relativity, particularly his look-back time prediction based on the speed of light, age of the universe and the time it takes light to travel great distances. Basically, telescopes cannot see into the past. I based this prediction on several factors, quantum entanglement, special relativity, James Maxwell's equations on EM fields "light" thermodynamics, and Paul Dirac's equations. I determined light information produced by distant galaxies would be conveyed in a quantum instant, regardless of distance because the telescope would be contained inside the distant galaxy's EM field "light cone", thus quantum entanglement of light would apply. That and the fact that according to general relativity time is relative to the observer, not distant objects being measured. Plus, general relativity would not even apply to bodies moving away from us faster than the speed of light. Nope. Special relativity's time dilation and length contraction would be measured by the telescope when measuring the distant galaxies. Thus the distant galaxies will look as they do today, in our relative reference frame of time. So they'll be old, fully formed spirals and ellipticals at the edge of the observable universe, further than when the big bang happened if the telescope is able to see that far. I wrote how the Nance Grace Roman telescope because it will be more sensitive than the JWST, will find even further galaxies, some larger and older than our own galaxy too but further than 14 billion light years away. Those galaxies will become the mother of all paradoxes, challenging the big bang, age of the universe, thermodynamics, general relativity, speed of light, distance to the CMBR, dark matter, Hubble constant, and the LCDM model used to explain the evolution of our universe. Thus why I wrote galaxies further than 14 billion light years away will be considered the mother of all paradoxes. Astronomers however found them using the JWST and instead, call them universe breakers. I published the paperback book *SECRET UNIVERSE : GRAVITY BY RON KEMP* on September 27 2021. Which was 3 months before the telescope was launched, and a year before astronomers confirmed them. I've got terminal cancer and I had one wish, to live long enough for my wild predictions about the early universe to be confirmed. I made it. Today, I'm in full remission. So life is good. My books have been selling well. All the money made from selling the books will go into treating the cancer, keep it in full remission. I thank all of you who have supported me. ♥
MOND was disproven a few years ago. And Dark Matter can explain these galaxies. They showed how Dark Matter explains how black holes can get so big so early already. This is just more MOND guys who will never give up.
Uh, hasn't MOND been essentially left behind? Dark matter models can be updated, especially in early epochs, but if MOND is a no-go, then it's a no-go in general. Essentially, dark matter allows for flexibility depending on how it manifests.
Darkness is a lie we tell ourselves when we cannot measure the amount of light There is no such thing as darkness everything is light we just don't have the instruments to measure it
Actually, I wrote and published several books before the JWST was launched and wrote how the telescope would not find young, small galaxies at the edge of the observable universe. I said the telescope would discover old, fully grown galaxies as far as it's able to see, even further than the light distance of 13.8 billion light years away. I said the galaxies at a light distance of 14 billion light years away would be larger than our own Milky Way galaxy.
In 2004 I discovered a glitch in Einstein's general theory of relativity, particularly his look-back time prediction based on the speed of light, age of the universe and the time it takes light to travel great distances. Basically, telescopes cannot see into the past. I based this prediction on several factors, quantum entanglement, special relativity, James Maxwell's equations on EM fields "light" thermodynamics, and Paul Dirac's equations. I determined light information produced by distant galaxies would be conveyed in a quantum instant, regardless of distance because the telescope would be contained inside the distant galaxy's EM field "light cone", thus quantum entanglement of light would apply. That and the fact that according to general relativity time is relative to the observer, not distant objects being measured. Plus, general relativity would not even apply to bodies moving away from us faster than the speed of light. Nope. Special relativity's time dilation and length contraction would be measured by the telescope when measuring the distant galaxies. Thus the distant galaxies will look as they do today, in our relative reference frame of time. So they'll be old, fully formed spirals and ellipticals at the edge of the observable universe, further than when the big bang happened if the telescope is able to see that far.
I wrote how the Nance Grace Roman telescope because it will be more sensitive than the JWST, will find even further galaxies, some larger and older than our own galaxy too but further than 14 billion light years away. Those galaxies will become the mother of all paradoxes, challenging the big bang, age of the universe, thermodynamics, general relativity, speed of light, distance to the CMBR, dark matter, Hubble constant, and the LCDM model used to explain the evolution of our universe. Thus why I wrote galaxies further than 14 billion light years away will be considered the mother of all paradoxes. Astronomers however found them using the JWST and instead, call them universe breakers.
I published the paperback book *SECRET UNIVERSE : GRAVITY BY RON KEMP* on September 27 2021. Which was 3 months before the telescope was launched, and a year before astronomers confirmed them.
I've got terminal cancer and I had one wish, to live long enough for my wild predictions about the early universe to be confirmed. I made it. Today, I'm in full remission. So life is good. My books have been selling well. All the money made from selling the books will go into treating the cancer, keep it in full remission. I thank all of you who have supported me. ♥
As a cancer survivor I wish you well
As a cancer survivor I wish you well I'm not sure if my first message made it
Thank you Mr. Kemp for working hard to expand our understanding of the cosmos. Our species needs more people such as you.
MOND was disproven a few years ago. And Dark Matter can explain these galaxies. They showed how Dark Matter explains how black holes can get so big so early already. This is just more MOND guys who will never give up.
Maybe our universe is older than we thought?
If everything is supposed to have started from the same point, how did we end up billions of light years away from these galaxies?
Uh, hasn't MOND been essentially left behind? Dark matter models can be updated, especially in early epochs, but if MOND is a no-go, then it's a no-go in general. Essentially, dark matter allows for flexibility depending on how it manifests.
Darkness is a lie we tell ourselves when we cannot measure the amount of light
There is no such thing as darkness everything is light we just don't have the instruments to measure it
JWST can only see so far. If it could see even further there would be more large galaxies. The universe is infinite.
😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣👎🏻