Should have applied saying he was a multiracial nonconfirming trans woman. HR would eat that up in a heartbeat and demand a second interview minimum. Worked for me
Not really. If you're going to both insult me and admit your own incompetence in a single sentence at an interview, I most likely don't want to work for you anyway.
@@aysnovYeah but you’re the one who ends up without a job still, while the company will hire someone who’ll take the abuse and drink the koolaid. I agree with the other guy, the joke is absolutely on you. You lose in this situation either way. It sucks, but it’s reality.
Apparently it's not uncommon for these companies to keep "hiring" for positions that don't actually exist, specifically to compile a shortlist of candidates to be contacted in case they want to hire someone in the future. So they're basically wasting your time. But if you're lucky they might contact you 18 months later and offer you a job, most likely after you've just moved across the country to get a job elsewhere.
@@andyasbestos It's almost always either that they already know who they want to hire but have to pretend to do interviews, or they want to lie and claim they can't find anyone so they should be able to get an H-1B.
i know how to solve the problem then! using your own memory space for your function will always be less space efficient than using a structure that allows for smaller data structures to be parallelized, so instead of driving, you take a train, and reduce space complexity by roughly a factor of 10, though you probably increase time complexity because of scheduling and inability to use quantum functions without disturbing other processes, no quantum bogo sort unfortunately
Interviewer: Find the optimal path to a random location. Candidate: ok, we can sta Interviewer: without accessing memory, in constant time, while never turning left and counting the traffic lights.
the ending got me! i scored a proctored interview with 3 test questions and an ide. my score was 98% according to a review i got 3 days later. they emailed for a second interview, during which they told me that i was no longer being pursued. i asked why and they said that they dont disclose that information and basically just left the call. :/
HR: "Sorry, Elon, we're actually looking for somebody with at least 20 years of experience of driving in a Tesla as this is a senior entry-level position and that's the technology we use."
Yea I really struggle with these interviews. I’m trying to get a Junior driver role but I really hate interviews. I had a few questions such as “define an efficient algorithm to change lanes in 5 seconds” and “Have you used any blind spot libraries in your past experience”. I do okay in those. However I really hate questions where I have to use the ⭐️ method. Questions such as “Tell me a time you experienced road rage” and “Tell me a time you experienced a race condition” always throw me off. It’s always the behavioural questions that throw me off.
Man, seeing this vid and reading these comments makes me glad I'm not alone. At the same time it makes me worried because that means we're living in a time where skilled people aren't getting hired. I'm trying to get a job like anywhere and I either get an emailed rejection 5 months after I stopped caring or I don't get anything at all. I apply for non-CS and non-Computer Engineering related stuff and at best I'd get like an interview and even if the interviewer seems pleased I don't get the job. And of course many "entry level" jobs need several years of experience or I'll see jobs marked for "recent graduates" and it reads off like "Senior firmware engineer" and have a bunch of crazy requirements.
So, some secret sauce for you. Those crazy requirements are one of a few things, 1- filler, yes companies do it too, these things are either written by an HR rep who doesn't know the actual requirements of the job, 2- a manager who is deep into the work, you can tell the difference by checking the wording, or 3- requirements that are not supposed to be met at 100%, mostly they are looking to fill at least 50% of those requirements, but this really depends on if it's an employee heavy job market, or an job heavy market. In an employee heavy market, those requirements have to be over filled, in a job heavy market you could probably score the job with only 25% of the requirements.
this is a random question, but what area are you in? and did you do any internships during your undergrad? it seems like a lot of jobs want you to do an internship or its like you have no chance, at least from what ive seen.
Dont be discouraged just keep applying. Think of it this way, if theyre being unreasonable even if you passed the interview and have all the reqs you probably dodged a bullet
A closer analogy would be a driving test where all you do is solve very difficult problems about how the engine works, about how to make the air conditioner cool air in constant time, while all this has nothing to do with actually driving in the real world 😂
I would debug the car by running it in debug mode by popping the hood. Then, I would google any and every thing that seems off. Finally, I would replace the defective parts with someone else's.
I was just doom scrolling but this video instantly caught my attention as I scrolled past because I was like wait was that video in HDR??? Really cool to see more HDR content on YT 💙
I would answer accelerate in a straight line for the better then linear time complexity since my distance when I'm accelerating can be defined by f(t) = f(t - 1) + t which has a Big-O Notation of O(x²), since we want the inverse (how much time it takes to get somewhere instead of where we will be after some amount of time), the time complexity is O(√x)
Tip: Constant time just means it doesn’t scale, not that it is immediate. Therefore, technically you can say driving forward is constant time as long as you drive faster for longer times so it’s always equal Also, making an if statement for every permutation is also O(1) You’re welcome
By definition, it would have to scale, because longer distance means you need to drive longer to get there. There is a limit to your speed that you can go, therefore even if you double speed and distance, it's still O(n), because at some point the speed cannot grow anymore and you have to start taking longer. The only way around this is to literally teleport. Even light can't travel faster than O(n).
@@spaghettiking653 Ignoring physics (because let’s be honest we already are) if you double length but also double the speed then the time would be the same and it would always scale constantly. Does it count? Ehh…not really I will admit, but it’s a car analogy so we’re already taking stretches here.
@@cubed.publicEhhhh idk, I think that misses the point of measuring the time complexity tho, because the car has an actual physical limit that can't really be crossed (I mean okay, maybe if you give it a jet engine or hyperdrive it would work), but that means at some point you would start needing more time to make it that distance. Tbh I don't see how we're ignoring physics, if anything we're having a pedantic chat about the exact physics involved and they definitely don't allow constant-time travel. I did forget that if you accelerate at a constant rate you can make O(sqrt(n)) time, but def not O(1) still. And even that is still capped bc acceleration also can't stay constant forever (in fact it will always go down if your engine runs at a constant power), so it'll stop being even O(sqrt(n)) for some long enough distance.
@@spaghettiking653 Yea, its a car analogy so I wasn't really trying to put too much thought into it. Basic idea is, it can take them years to cross to the other side, as long as they can argue it'll take the same amount of time for any length, its O(1)
I would've said O(n) because you need to also calculate the amount of other cars which are allowed to drive before you do Since taking the turn takes the same amount every time, the only variable would be the amount of other cars driving before you're allowed to take a turn
Kids, dont do coding interviews, coding challenges, tests or the likes - ever. It may "seem" normal to you, coming directly from school - but it isnt. At all. Basically, all employers which are doing this want to filter out people who can think for themselves from people who can recite memorized stuff and work like a robot. Which means : you are applying to be a robot, for extremely low wage. If you get rejected you basically proved to be a normal person. Also : **never** work for free - under no circumstance. You, doing tests or answering weird tech questions is like working for free. Get them to sign a contract with you - and **then** you can answer questions and whatnot. Know your worth, kids. You deserve it.
![BOWKYLION - วิงวอน (ex-change) [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/cLdnZWDaO-w/mqdefault.jpg)
how do you have only 209 subs bruh your pretty funny
Thanks brotha
Way funnier than 95% of skits
Because subscribers have been Basically pointless for years
you're*
823
Bro teleported and broke physics just to get beat by “other candidates” 😂
average cs application experience
Well you know, boss have son and he applied too so...
Bro should have learned a time travel. It's like he's trying to use Fortran when he could be using Rust.
Should have applied saying he was a multiracial nonconfirming trans woman.
HR would eat that up in a heartbeat and demand a second interview minimum.
Worked for me
Other candidates are chatgpt
I’m glad I took 4 years of CS to get these jokes
You could learn it on TH-cam like I did
It does not take 4 years of classes to get these jokes
@@The9thDoctor Get some glasses and take some English classes.
@@The9thDoctorbut it takes 4 years to feel them
I'm going back for a second Bachelor's in CS so that in 4 years ill be able to laugh along with you
Man solved P=NP in an interview question and still didn't get the job 😭
😭😭
Don't you get $1,000,000 for solving that question? Bro doesn't need an SWE job anymore 💀💀💀
Bruh it's so easy:
P = NP
P/P = NP/P
N = 1
N = 1 for P ≠ 0
@@bruhmomenthdr7575you could mine a few blocks of btc with it too
Going faster is still linear time. The correct answer is to accelerate. With constant acceleration, you can reach your destination in O(√ n) time.
i like how the car inverted instead, the wheel and the driver magically switched between right and left side
Yeah, I was about to write a comment about that. He actually inverted a left, rather than just turning right, xD.
I thought that was weird but I didn't catch it as s joke, I just ignored it as a goof, but that's REALLY FUNNY.
"So apparently the resume screening didn't really do its job"
Wow is that a real phrase used by recruiters ? That would make me crumble
Keep ya head up
The only correct answer to that is "thanks for letting me improve my job offer selection process".
Followed by leaving and not looking back.
@@aysnov Problem is, the joke is on you.
Not really. If you're going to both insult me and admit your own incompetence in a single sentence at an interview, I most likely don't want to work for you anyway.
@@aysnovYeah but you’re the one who ends up without a job still, while the company will hire someone who’ll take the abuse and drink the koolaid.
I agree with the other guy, the joke is absolutely on you. You lose in this situation either way. It sucks, but it’s reality.
"Apparently the resume screening didn't do its job"
I am sobbing on the floor right now. It's too cold and accurate.
"I wouldn't worry about it too much, it seems we both have something we could improve on."
and are these "other candidates" in the room with us now?
SKIT ON “OTHER CANDIDATES” COMING SOON
Apparently it's not uncommon for these companies to keep "hiring" for positions that don't actually exist, specifically to compile a shortlist of candidates to be contacted in case they want to hire someone in the future.
So they're basically wasting your time. But if you're lucky they might contact you 18 months later and offer you a job, most likely after you've just moved across the country to get a job elsewhere.
@@andyasbestos It's almost always either that they already know who they want to hire but have to pretend to do interviews, or they want to lie and claim they can't find anyone so they should be able to get an H-1B.
💀💀💀💀
@@andyasbestosIt takes two to tango. It's 100% legal to interview for a job you're not interested in accepting.
They were already set on hiring the son of someone that works at the company. Nepotism always wins
You try living in other people's bodies for approaching 10 months and then get back to me with that attitude.
The real tech job application process is applying to a job with nepotism (you know someone at the company) and still losing to "other candidates"
They was looking for both time and space to be O(1). The space was still O(TON).
Ahh. That makes sense.
O(Ton) is O(1) up to a scaling factor though
i know how to solve the problem then! using your own memory space for your function will always be less space efficient than using a structure that allows for smaller data structures to be parallelized, so instead of driving, you take a train, and reduce space complexity by roughly a factor of 10, though you probably increase time complexity because of scheduling and inability to use quantum functions without disturbing other processes, no quantum bogo sort unfortunately
its never enough for the recruiters. coulda had the cure to cancer, but its always "we're looking at other candidates with more experience" smh 🤦♂
Finding the cure to cancer doesn't necessarily mean you're up to the job
@@MilkGlue-xg5vjFound the recruiter
@@MilkGlue-xg5vj recruiter found
@@MilkGlue-xg5vjInverting a binary tree does, though, I guess.
@@ThePC007That shouldn't do too, inverting a binary tree doesn't mean you're up to THE job
i always wondered what the "other candidates" are like
Skit on this coming soon
@@chavann looking forward to watch that video
It would be real funny if he just uploaded the exact same video but with a different title
People who know the right people.
The interviewer's cousin.
Interviewer: Find the optimal path to a random location.
Candidate: ok, we can sta
Interviewer: without accessing memory, in constant time, while never turning left and counting the traffic lights.
Accidentally breaks the laws of physics.
Yeah no we got some other candidates we’d like to look at.
the ending got me! i scored a proctored interview with 3 test questions and an ide. my score was 98% according to a review i got 3 days later. they emailed for a second interview, during which they told me that i was no longer being pursued. i asked why and they said that they dont disclose that information and basically just left the call. :/
That's crazy, it's like they've lost all human decency
How do you score 98% on 3 questions? Partial credit?
He used Microsoft word as his side of choice
@@succuponit was graded on efficiency, correctness, time spent, and some other things i assume.
That position was meant for someone "related". Simple as that.
HR: "Sorry, Elon, we're actually looking for somebody with at least 20 years of experience of driving in a Tesla as this is a senior entry-level position and that's the technology we use."
I shit you not, I pass the leetcode + user interview, and at the end of the interview, they said better luck next time lmao
At this point saying that just became a standard part of their recruitment process lmao
HAHAH “driving bootcamp grad”
the way he did an inverted left by mirror flipping the car/universe
His O(1) was slower than just doing it in O(N), too big a C,
Would revolutionize space flight though.
Maybe you can accelerate at constant acceleration to get O(sqrt(n)) of time complexity
smart
So...keep stepping on the pedal? Or on the other hand, don't be a jerk?
Acing the interview and still getting passed up is so painfully real lmao I hate it here
It's CS when you study, but BS when you start working
He drove on the I-80 AND the interstate!?!?!
That does sound like the extensive experience you'd expect from a driving boot camp grad.
Casually inverts space itself to do a right turn
1:09 bro throwing mad shade, im ded xD
Bro didn't just invert the turn, he inverted the driver's side of the car
seatbelts mofo
Not telling what you're thinking is a red flag
Having to solve these questions is a red flag
The ending is real. and I haven't even finished my degree yet. Those exams and intership reviews are just like this sometimes.
Other candidates means some indian guy with half the salary but double the bugs 😂
I'm dead at O(ton) complexity
INVERT A LEFT TURN HAHAH
😭😭
Yeah... I knew I should have been a bio major instead.
Most realistic part is that he still didn't get hired
Me: "What else is he supposed to do, teleport?"
...
"Oh, okay, I guess so."
If you do too well they will nix you since you're a threat to them.
last part is relatable
God I hope no one says “apparently the resume screening didn’t do its job” in a real interview
Yea I really struggle with these interviews. I’m trying to get a Junior driver role but I really hate interviews. I had a few questions such as “define an efficient algorithm to change lanes in 5 seconds” and “Have you used any blind spot libraries in your past experience”. I do okay in those. However I really hate questions where I have to use the ⭐️ method. Questions such as “Tell me a time you experienced road rage” and “Tell me a time you experienced a race condition” always throw me off. It’s always the behavioural questions that throw me off.
I would hire a guy who came with constant time solution which I didn't know was possible regardless.
bahaha!! Oh man, this was hilarious. It's crazy how accurate this is right now. Good stuff man!
Thanks, appreciate it
EVERYTIME I applied to a job lmao
tuff content
Roads would be so much safer if driving tests were this specific
Man, seeing this vid and reading these comments makes me glad I'm not alone. At the same time it makes me worried because that means we're living in a time where skilled people aren't getting hired. I'm trying to get a job like anywhere and I either get an emailed rejection 5 months after I stopped caring or I don't get anything at all. I apply for non-CS and non-Computer Engineering related stuff and at best I'd get like an interview and even if the interviewer seems pleased I don't get the job. And of course many "entry level" jobs need several years of experience or I'll see jobs marked for "recent graduates" and it reads off like "Senior firmware engineer" and have a bunch of crazy requirements.
Hey man yea it’s tough out there rn but keep applying and working on ur skills. You only need 1 to hit and ur good. Keep ya head up
So, some secret sauce for you. Those crazy requirements are one of a few things, 1- filler, yes companies do it too, these things are either written by an HR rep who doesn't know the actual requirements of the job, 2- a manager who is deep into the work, you can tell the difference by checking the wording, or 3- requirements that are not supposed to be met at 100%, mostly they are looking to fill at least 50% of those requirements, but this really depends on if it's an employee heavy job market, or an job heavy market. In an employee heavy market, those requirements have to be over filled, in a job heavy market you could probably score the job with only 25% of the requirements.
this is a random question, but what area are you in? and did you do any internships during your undergrad? it seems like a lot of jobs want you to do an internship or its like you have no chance, at least from what ive seen.
"Try being black next time, we could have skipped this entire process."
Start the car with -Ofast, at your own risk
We hire internally
And the licence went to the Boss' rich cousin who played Forza Horizon once
Bro missed the opportunity to do a Scandinavian flick.
should have ended with "we'll let you know if you passed next week, we'll stay in contact" (they never got back to him)
Instead of simply turning right, dude inverted the video. That got me a hearty chuckle. =P
as someone trying to get a SE job i can feel this down to my heart
if there is no requirement on completion time, leaving the car and pushing it would be more efficient
yeah just press buttons until you do something that works and then claim you're just unfamiliar with this specific device
this is what im currently fearing about entering the industry rn
Dont be discouraged just keep applying. Think of it this way, if theyre being unreasonable even if you passed the interview and have all the reqs you probably dodged a bullet
I would like a solution to drive in O(1) time.
Sir, this is a Wendy’s.
Lol nailed the awkward corporate vibe
A closer analogy would be a driving test where all you do is solve very difficult problems about how the engine works, about how to make the air conditioner cool air in constant time, while all this has nothing to do with actually driving in the real world 😂
The job is actually just changing radio stations and adjusting the seat
Accelerate, then you travel the distance in (sqrt(n)) time
I really do want to see a skit about debugging the car if it failed to start lol
This is actually extremely clever on so many levels !
-please, tell me, what you did wrong!?
-hmm, let me think... I didn't switch the lights on? I hit a pedestrian?
-you haven't fasten your setbelt
I would debug the car by running it in debug mode by popping the hood. Then, I would google any and every thing that seems off. Finally, I would replace the defective parts with someone else's.
I was just doom scrolling but this video instantly caught my attention as I scrolled past because I was like wait was that video in HDR??? Really cool to see more HDR content on YT 💙
I wouldn't even apply for a job like this in the first place lol
"although you had a perfect score, we just feel like you weren't a culture fit for our company"
It took me 2 years of computer science in collage to understand this jokes 😂
your content is amazing bro 😂
Constant time driving is so based xD
I would answer accelerate in a straight line for the better then linear time complexity since my distance when I'm accelerating can be defined by f(t) = f(t - 1) + t which has a Big-O Notation of O(x²), since we want the inverse (how much time it takes to get somewhere instead of where we will be after some amount of time), the time complexity is O(√x)
here before 1000 subs XDDDD most creative skit ive seen in a long time
Thanks! Appreciate it
1. Hard leetcode problem ❌
2. Driving on incline ✅
Too relatable to be funny...
no no, they won't reject you. they won't answer anything and disappear.
mf teleported and still failed 😭
Applying to lots of jobs rn, I'm relating too much to your vids.
Good luck bro
His career will be over soon, he shouldn’t waste it playing the wrong games
Brother you are hilarious, Bravo!
Thanks!
Superb idea! Loved the constant time movement! If you can improve video quality in future videos, you could get lots of subscribers.
Driving at O(1) time complexity is crazy
still doesn't pass the interview 🥶
Tip: Constant time just means it doesn’t scale, not that it is immediate.
Therefore, technically you can say driving forward is constant time as long as you drive faster for longer times so it’s always equal
Also, making an if statement for every permutation is also O(1)
You’re welcome
By definition, it would have to scale, because longer distance means you need to drive longer to get there. There is a limit to your speed that you can go, therefore even if you double speed and distance, it's still O(n), because at some point the speed cannot grow anymore and you have to start taking longer.
The only way around this is to literally teleport. Even light can't travel faster than O(n).
@@spaghettiking653 Ignoring physics (because let’s be honest we already are) if you double length but also double the speed then the time would be the same and it would always scale constantly. Does it count? Ehh…not really I will admit, but it’s a car analogy so we’re already taking stretches here.
@@cubed.publicEhhhh idk, I think that misses the point of measuring the time complexity tho, because the car has an actual physical limit that can't really be crossed (I mean okay, maybe if you give it a jet engine or hyperdrive it would work), but that means at some point you would start needing more time to make it that distance.
Tbh I don't see how we're ignoring physics, if anything we're having a pedantic chat about the exact physics involved and they definitely don't allow constant-time travel. I did forget that if you accelerate at a constant rate you can make O(sqrt(n)) time, but def not O(1) still. And even that is still capped bc acceleration also can't stay constant forever (in fact it will always go down if your engine runs at a constant power), so it'll stop being even O(sqrt(n)) for some long enough distance.
@@spaghettiking653 Yea, its a car analogy so I wasn't really trying to put too much thought into it.
Basic idea is, it can take them years to cross to the other side, as long as they can argue it'll take the same amount of time for any length, its O(1)
@@cubed.publicOh that makes sense ig lol
inspiring
Big o is the only thing I learned from college I stg
Driving market these days....
That's totally the Google process.
Instant sub
Subbed.
Dude I hope developers are okay in the coming decade. Gonna be a lot of replacement with GPT tier tools.
This was so good 😂
I would've said O(n) because you need to also calculate the amount of other cars which are allowed to drive before you do
Since taking the turn takes the same amount every time, the only variable would be the amount of other cars driving before you're allowed to take a turn
I like that, very funny
This was perfect
This is too funny
Kids, dont do coding interviews, coding challenges, tests or the likes - ever. It may "seem" normal to you, coming directly from school - but it isnt. At all. Basically, all employers which are doing this want to filter out people who can think for themselves from people who can recite memorized stuff and work like a robot.
Which means : you are applying to be a robot, for extremely low wage. If you get rejected you basically proved to be a normal person. Also : **never** work for free - under no circumstance. You, doing tests or answering weird tech questions is like working for free. Get them to sign a contract with you - and **then** you can answer questions and whatnot. Know your worth, kids. You deserve it.
LMAO
Ur the goat
OBD Port.
Haha love these !!