China's industrial output is unmatched in the world, they are the country that can build the most surface ships in a year. I think we will see more Nuclear subs and surface combatant ships from China, which in turn, we will see technological advances from the PLAN.
@@kptlt.phillipthomsen5973 True, depending on what you are referring to. The submarine force and surface combatants of the PLAN is strong, you cannot deny this.
@@kptlt.phillipthomsen5973 that is true but the US Naval Intelligence and others, now rate the PLA Navy vessels to be world class and rapidly improving in capabilities. The price of the latest Chinese warships should be a good indicator of the quality of the PLA Navy's new vessels.
I wonder if there are any images of the Type 093G available in the public domain? I could not find any image of Type 093 SSN with vertical launch cells.
I had a search too and couldn't find any images of the 93G VLS either. But Chinese media has been pretty definitive that this variant has 12 VLS, so I think it is reliable info
@@EurasiaNaval Is that your answer? In essence you've said your video is partially based on Chinese media. The Chinese pride themselves as liars. Deception and dissimulation are a core element of the Chinese character, except within the family and clan.
Top notch vid as always - I reckon if I were asked about china’s ability when comparing it peer to peer with Russia and the US - then I would say that China is outpacing both of them in all spheres of ship building ,EXCEPT for submarines- I still rank Russia #1 in submarine warfare as that is the Russian naval doctrine - they cannot afford to build multiple aircraft carriers so nuclear armed/powered subs are their bread and butter - especially their new submarines- the Laika class (husky class) which is being designed and finalised for construction with hypersonic weapons in mind as well as stealth features + other 5th generation tech US is #2 due to the sheer size of her navy and her power projection capability + her Ohio and Virginia class stealth nuclear submarines China will in my opinion become #2 for subs once type 95 and 96 SSBN are seen in public and we can assess them but I am confident that any 95/96 will be the most technological advanced of the era due to the way time and technology has advanced since the US built their Ohio/Virginia subs That Olympic class sub might just be a test bed for future tech such as the lithium ion batteries as well as stealth coating on the ship and other tech that will no doubt be tested before it’s incorporated into future sub designs but I think it’s indicative of China understanding that they need a balance of offensive subs as well as smaller defensive stealth subs - very smart as usual by Chinese high command Won’t be surprised if in 2 years or less i see u make a video on the new type 0-76 LHD and the CATOBAR system which will be included to make sure China is the first country with a drone carrier - can already imagine naval wing-loong 2 drones as well as stealth bomber drones such as starfish 5 or sharp sword
Well, most of the subs in Russia are built by the Soviets (I like the Dmitry donskoy tho and the kursk 141). And USA submarines are better for me (ex. The ohio) . China subs are the best for me, ex. Type 093, 095, 039, 096 etc. The type 100 will be built soon.
@@Absolut531kmh don’t disagree that China will eventually become the best submarine builder but IMO Russia and the US have been buildings subs for longer and therefore will still retain a slight advantage for a couple more years but by 2025-2030 I reckon China will overtake both of them in all types of ship building As for the type 95/96/100 - I have personally no seen any photos of either 3 subs - I won’t comment on these subs until I have seen their capabilities and we can assess them - right now they are still being built and the type 100 is no way near being completed soon - I reckon type 100 will only be built once 95/96 have been built and tested and commissioned- so maybe 2030- 2035 we will see type 100??
Thanks for your support and excellent assessment. In my view, the US is the leader when it comes to nuclear submarines. Perhaps the latest Russian SSNs, such as the Yasen, are at the same level as the latest US ones qualitatively, but it's undeniable that the US has far more quantity of the latest designs. I agree China is behind both the US and Russia in SSNs, at least for now, but it is catching up quickly. In conventional submarines though, it is a lot more even, and many would say in that space China might be ahead of the Russians, with AIP and lithium ion technology, etc
The PLAN has done a remarkable job of overhauling and completely modernizing their surface force, their submarines are a different story. They’re at least a decade behind in the Great Power Competition as it pertains subsurface warfare capabilities. The US and Russia have a substantial lead in this regard, many don’t realize all of the challenges that comes with subsurface warfare. Even after 60 years of countering each other both the US and Russia still aren’t where they want to be in this domain. The PRC was on the sideline for most of this, their commanding officers and crew have nowhere near the operational experience, this greatly matters! Their entire force is intended to operate within the island chains as a defensive picket and even in this capacity they would struggle tremendously against the US in a conflict. That all said, they’re very well postured going forward and will no doubt close the gap in the coming years. This is one your best videos to date, love the complete rundown of their entire submarine force!
This video and also the US Office of Naval Intelligence suggests otherwise. I would think that the improvements seen in the surface vessels is also being carried out in the submarine force.
Thanks for your support my dude. I agree the US and Russia had a large head start, and China has much distance to close, although as you say the improvement is evident and will likely continue
Nuclear powered submarines are definitely one of the most sophisticated naval technology out there, and possibly on par with nuclear aircraft carriers. So much has to work properly for the vessel to function at 800 meters underwater, and without much margin for error!
Once again a superb video. It would be good if you could give some technical details of how the AIP works. You say that there is an extra motor, but how does that work, also if lithium batteries are used, would that make AIP redundant.
A lots of people don't know that submarine don't need engine to move. Underwater current can actuarially move one to three knots. Though I like the image of submarine in river. water noise in river are way nosier than the ocean, it make Chinese subs seems quiet.
excellent summary and analysis of what we know (btw, right to say li battery is speculative but worth pointing out that ch battery research is up there because of ev industry). a medum term proect might b to research quality of manpower, training, recruitment, doctine, recruitment esp bearing in mind expansion of plan, etc, etc. i say medium-term because that would require some deep research - esp ch sources although cctv and other ch sources might give some basic info - any research or news on plan training/sailors would only b skin-deep but it might still give a hint of the quality of manpower (there is a tad more out there on plaaf pilot training). w/o adeqate quality manpower, all the new ships are only...bearing in mind quality of the adversary.
The short answer is that most of the easily accessible sources are outdated when it comes to Chinese submarine numbers, and the number 6 has been floating around for a while. The US government has estimated that China had 6 active Type 094s (both variants) back in early 2021. However, in April 2021, an additional Type 094A was commissioned publicly by President Xi (a very rare occurrence for new PLAN ships), along with a Type 075 LHD and a Type 055 destroyer. So at the very least you now have 7 vessels, if the initial US assessment was accurate. Furthermore, a photo is available with what appears to be 4 of the original Type 094s in the same frame (although to be fair an old Type 092 can be easily mistaken for a 094), and we know from the PLAN footage I have shown in the video that there was at least two Type 94As in service. This again makes 6 boats at the start of 2021, assuming that PLAN hasn't upgraded the Type 094s into 094A. Plus the single newly commissioned 094A will again yield 7 boats. There are also more up-to-date western sources that estimate as many as 10 boats that are either in service or launched, and these are from fairly well-informed people. Personally, I consider 10 too high given the paucity of footages and other evidence, however. Anyway, sorry for the wall of text, and hopefully it illustrates where I got my 7-8 figure from.
@@EurasiaNaval please cite those sources. The 2021 CMPR from last Nov still had 6. USSTRATCOM/Admiral Richard has said multiple times this year there are only 6. The estimate you're referring to from early last year was already counting the last 094A that was about to be commissioned...
If you look up the third link under my references, it will show a breakdown of the photos the authors analysed of the Type 94. They estimated 8-10 boats. They even labelled their photo assessment of the submarines (persumably this includes the number of subs they quoted in each photo) as "indisputable data" - perhaps a case of bad translation from French, but the point stands that they are confident of their assessment. In the thread on SDF on the Type 093/094 submarines, the general feel I got from reading the posts is that people believe there are more than 6 boats. Also, just know I am trying to respond to a lot of comments from my phone, and its hard to link stuff on this device. I already put in a decent effort in the replies here, and I am totally fine if you are still not convinced. You can have your own opinion. Thanks again
It is known to several experts that the PLA subs diversity and strategies are this world's best and supported by unbeaten simulations. This will fortunately not be bragged by neither, PLA, allies nor adversaries. Quite lethal, thanks for the great visuals.
Chinese development in submarines is ongoing and cost reductions are achieved however both the USA and the UK have stagnated over the past decade. With the new detection of deep diving submarines by listening to the exploding fine bubbles flowing off the hull the stealth of submarines which is the key issue in there detergent will be gone. With this detection the older noisey subs can be placed in the travel lines of the US /UK submarines and wait to ambush them. The effect of US attack class subs will be greatly reduced in a combat rol.
I know you would likely stay away from this topic, but can you make a video on the role the PLAN will play in the eventual attack on Taiwan? If not, at least make a video on the type 003
@@EurasiaNaval always thought you were Australian from the accent. I hope more people in Taiwan can watch your videos and stop the illusion. Usa wants them dead, they are not allies.
@@EurasiaNavalI know this is an old comment but, I like the content that you produce and your style. Would you mind making a video on the Iranian and IRGC navies and their shipyards? Understandable if you don't want to.
The US CSIS ‘s study suggested by using nuclear submarine may help the US to win the war in Taiwan Straight. So, China must solve this problem immediately!
China is currently the biggest producer of LFP batteries, thus will use them for a new class of Submarines, they also are building German copies of Diesel engines ( reversed engineered)for the Subs,
how strong now? It does not matter much now. What matters is how fast the Chinese submarine force is growing. I, n not too distant future it will dwarf the combined submarine forces of the US and its allies.
Be advised that the word "submariner" when spoken by submariners in the US Navy has the accent on the third syllable: sub ma REEN er. All others in the Navy and other services as well as civilians mispronounce it as you did in the video. For your info only.
Funny. If you’re the only ones who pronounce it the other way, what makes you think it’s the rest of the world that’s mispronouncing it? You’ve got that the wrong way round, old chap.
China is dependent on automation in their military, but very few of its military members know how to maintain these devices and many of China's military advanced hardware is out of service for repairs or upgrades.....
Are their Yuan class diesel submarines the ones that use German engines? They had some trouble selling one to Thailand which insisted on their sub having the original German engine instead of a Chinese made engine?
I don't believe the Yuan class uses the German engines. This is because the Germans stopped supplying their MTU 396 diesel engines for the previous Type 039 Song class, and China built the last few boats of that class with its domestic Shaanxi diesels. It wouldn't make sense for the Germans to supply new engines for the subsequent Yuan class, and China can make its own engines anyway. I won't speculate on why Thailand insists on China honouring its original contract to include a German engine. There's too much variables in that to spell out in a short comment.
As a country i wouldn't buy submarine made in China. Their highly secretive government kept development failures.several reports of crews trapped failing to surface.submarine operation is sophisticated, even on the engine used they could not copy german know how.any country who would buy its submarine at its own risk. See what happened to their fighter jet development.
Well in Taiwan we frequently had American made helicopters crashing and killing everyone inside, because they are low quality products that were bought for political reasons rather than having any practical value. A top general and his staff were killed a couple of years ago when his black hawk crashed. Our government should be suing the US for the lives their bad equipment had claimed.
@@EurasiaNaval at first this contract sign in junta era and RTN got pressure from junta to buy yuan class even all time RTN was go to learn know how in Germany which is the decision that make public opinion were suspecious and criticism navy hard even so navy try to still the project with hard lobbying in defense committee of parliament and hide many data to the public.In the topic of engine many times Chinese can use civilian sterling engine in thier submarine but with new green light coalition with green foreign minister had to sight on china and ban the engine export to china completely. Right now , they have some rumors to give song class or use Chinese engine but it really hard to happen because submarine always watch by anyone and with a lot of scandal that expose in recent years so it is uneasy situation to continue the project without risk of government collapse. Buying submarine in Thailand always negative in Thailand for two decades but choosing china submarine is going to the worst. The deal like these was happen before with some surface ship that china make alot of that but submarine in that time alot of submarine proposal mostly new and never use or built such as China Korea Sweden (except Germany) From current public opinion or may be parliament are more support to built another Korea frigate in Thailand for investment return benefits to Thai and submarine project must be cancelled nevertheless this fiasco hit relationship between RTN and china hard and ruin RTN in public eye alot as the most focus internal research and development brance of military in Thailand.
I won't suggest whether or not Thailand should buy this submarine - that is Thailand's decision. What I will say is that I don't think Thailand has actually made up its mind on what they want, because of the internal political situation, as you say. If Thailand doesn't want this submarine, it should just say that to China. Yes, there will be diplomatic consequences, but if Thailand want to cancel the deal anyway, it is better to say this now rather than later. China I am sure can use the submarine in its own navy, or sell to another country, so there is no lasting financial losses except a loss of face.
as with everything, it depends on what you buy. if you buy the cheapest of the cheapest, the quality will be bad. most of my electronics(and probably yours) are made in china either partially or completely. so far i havent had any issues.
They are good enough to sneak into neighboring and regional backward countries territorial water without any detection, i would not be too surprised many of these countries are unaware when Chinese submarine sailed around their coastal water. Since they don't see it, they never know it ever happened. 👮🏼♂️👨🏼✈️
I think it's worth mentioning the NATO codes for each submarine just once, for informational purposes, but I agree for an overview video like this, it is better to stick to the original Type 0XX name for all subsequent references for consistency, because there are many classes to cover and it is easy to get confused. For a video on just a single submarine class, I would feel OK with using the NATO and Chinese terms interchangeably. Feel free to disagree
@@EurasiaNaval Oh sorry, my point is that NATO codes of Chinese subs are somehow unreasonable and chaotic, like they just put all those subs together and randomly pick one of Chinese dynasty names to them and it always make me confused. Great video, my apology if you feel offensive🤢
This is a example in the realm of adjudication of any tautological dichotomy without force or remorse as envisioned in the universal dynamic US Constitution devoid of race or religion for peace and harmony as an honor system to be heaven on earth finally! So, keep hope alive only! Hahahahahar!
A lots of people don't know that submarine don't need engine to move. Underwater current can actuarially move one to three knots. Though I like the image of submarine in river. water noise in river are way nosier than the ocean, it make Chinese subs seems quiet.
This channel deserves significantly more subscribers. Great content.
Thanks sir, I'm flattered
Couldn’t agree more!
@@EurasiaNaval can you please do the us next
It’s not what China is showing us , it’s what they are not showing us that’s deserves respect. The silence is very loud ….
Awesome information! The submarines are really overlooked by many. Thanks for summarizing it!
Thanks for your support
Not the USN. They know this is the muscle of the USN
This channel is really good.... ...i really love this channel.... This channel deserved a lot of subscribers
Glad you are enjoying the content
China's industrial output is unmatched in the world, they are the country that can build the most surface ships in a year. I think we will see more Nuclear subs and surface combatant ships from China, which in turn, we will see technological advances from the PLAN.
Quantity does not = Quality
@@kptlt.phillipthomsen5973 True, depending on what you are referring to. The submarine force and surface combatants of the PLAN is strong, you cannot deny this.
@@kptlt.phillipthomsen5973 yeah like F22, suffering early production stop and planned retirement? Lol
@@kptlt.phillipthomsen5973 that is true but the US Naval Intelligence and others, now rate the PLA Navy vessels to be world class and rapidly improving in capabilities.
The price of the latest Chinese warships should be a good indicator of the quality of the PLA Navy's new vessels.
They also boil puppies and release bio weapons
Keep up the good work friend
Thanks for the visit!
if u notice the nuclear attack class subs have odd numbers for Types.. 91,93,95.. the Nuclear Ballastic submarine is Type 94, and 96.. rumored.
Always Informative.
I wonder if there are any images of the Type 093G available in the public domain?
I could not find any image of Type 093 SSN with vertical launch cells.
It's obscure. They don't want to give many informations.
I had a search too and couldn't find any images of the 93G VLS either. But Chinese media has been pretty definitive that this variant has 12 VLS, so I think it is reliable info
@@EurasiaNaval Is that your answer? In essence you've said your video is partially based on Chinese media. The Chinese pride themselves as liars. Deception and dissimulation are a core element of the Chinese character, except within the family and clan.
Top notch vid as always - I reckon if I were asked about china’s ability when comparing it peer to peer with Russia and the US - then I would say that China is outpacing both of them in all spheres of ship building ,EXCEPT for submarines-
I still rank Russia #1 in submarine warfare as that is the Russian naval doctrine - they cannot afford to build multiple aircraft carriers so nuclear armed/powered subs are their bread and butter - especially their new submarines- the Laika class (husky class) which is being designed and finalised for construction with hypersonic weapons in mind as well as stealth features + other 5th generation tech
US is #2 due to the sheer size of her navy and her power projection capability + her Ohio and Virginia class stealth nuclear submarines
China will in my opinion become #2 for subs once type 95 and 96 SSBN are seen in public and we can assess them but I am confident that any 95/96 will be the most technological advanced of the era due to the way time and technology has advanced since the US built their Ohio/Virginia subs
That Olympic class sub might just be a test bed for future tech such as the lithium ion batteries as well as stealth coating on the ship and other tech that will no doubt be tested before it’s incorporated into future sub designs but I think it’s indicative of China understanding that they need a balance of offensive subs as well as smaller defensive stealth subs - very smart as usual by Chinese high command
Won’t be surprised if in 2 years or less i see u make a video on the new type 0-76 LHD and the CATOBAR system which will be included to make sure China is the first country with a drone carrier - can already imagine naval wing-loong 2 drones as well as stealth bomber drones such as starfish 5 or sharp sword
Well, most of the subs in Russia are built by the Soviets (I like the Dmitry donskoy tho and the kursk 141). And USA submarines are better for me (ex. The ohio) . China subs are the best for me, ex. Type 093, 095, 039, 096 etc. The type 100 will be built soon.
@@Absolut531kmh don’t disagree that China will eventually become the best submarine builder but IMO Russia and the US have been buildings subs for longer and therefore will still retain a slight advantage for a couple more years but by 2025-2030 I reckon China will overtake both of them in all types of ship building
As for the type 95/96/100 - I have personally no seen any photos of either 3 subs - I won’t comment on these subs until I have seen their capabilities and we can assess them - right now they are still being built and the type 100 is no way near being completed soon - I reckon type 100 will only be built once 95/96 have been built and tested and commissioned- so maybe 2030- 2035 we will see type 100??
@@fareschallah6773 yea ig around 2040 for the type 100 idk
@@fareschallah6773 can't disagree with you tbh
Thanks for your support and excellent assessment. In my view, the US is the leader when it comes to nuclear submarines. Perhaps the latest Russian SSNs, such as the Yasen, are at the same level as the latest US ones qualitatively, but it's undeniable that the US has far more quantity of the latest designs. I agree China is behind both the US and Russia in SSNs, at least for now, but it is catching up quickly. In conventional submarines though, it is a lot more even, and many would say in that space China might be ahead of the Russians, with AIP and lithium ion technology, etc
The PLAN has done a remarkable job of overhauling and completely modernizing their surface force, their submarines are a different story. They’re at least a decade behind in the Great Power Competition as it pertains subsurface warfare capabilities. The US and Russia have a substantial lead in this regard, many don’t realize all of the challenges that comes with subsurface warfare. Even after 60 years of countering each other both the US and Russia still aren’t where they want to be in this domain. The PRC was on the sideline for most of this, their commanding officers and crew have nowhere near the operational experience, this greatly matters! Their entire force is intended to operate within the island chains as a defensive picket and even in this capacity they would struggle tremendously against the US in a conflict. That all said, they’re very well postured going forward and will no doubt close the gap in the coming years. This is one your best videos to date, love the complete rundown of their entire submarine force!
This video and also the US Office of Naval Intelligence suggests otherwise.
I would think that the improvements seen in the surface vessels is also being carried out in the submarine force.
@@simonyip5978 If it were only that simple…
Thanks for your support my dude. I agree the US and Russia had a large head start, and China has much distance to close, although as you say the improvement is evident and will likely continue
Nuclear powered submarines are definitely one of the most sophisticated naval technology out there, and possibly on par with nuclear aircraft carriers. So much has to work properly for the vessel to function at 800 meters underwater, and without much margin for error!
@@simonyip5978 But the China submarine crews can't handle the environment been under sea for long period of time... they HAVE SEA SICKNESS!!!
Definitely stronger than before. 👍🇨🇳🇨🇳
for China conventional sub is OK as we only want to defend our coastal area. 2 weeks under sea is good enough
Once again a superb video. It would be good if you could give some technical details of how the AIP works. You say that there is an extra motor, but how does that work, also if lithium batteries are used, would that make AIP redundant.
U don't need nuclear subs for the purpose that China has in mind which is coastal defense. Just saying what the Australian former pm said
A lots of people don't know that submarine don't need engine to move. Underwater current can actuarially move one to three knots. Though I like the image of submarine in river.
water noise in river are way nosier than the ocean, it make Chinese subs seems quiet.
I must believe in little green men also
excellent summary and analysis of what we know (btw, right to say li battery is speculative but worth pointing out that ch battery research is up there because of ev industry). a medum term proect might b to research quality of manpower, training, recruitment, doctine, recruitment esp bearing in mind expansion of plan, etc, etc. i say medium-term because that would require some deep research - esp ch sources although cctv and other ch sources might give some basic info - any research or news on plan training/sailors would only b skin-deep but it might still give a hint of the quality of manpower (there is a tad more out there on plaaf pilot training). w/o adeqate quality manpower, all the new ships are only...bearing in mind quality of the adversary.
You made some good points in there!
Why'd you say there's 7-8 type 094s? Everything I've read shows there's only 6 of the type, all variants.
The speed of construction means that even information from a year or two ago is often already outdated and inaccurate.
The short answer is that most of the easily accessible sources are outdated when it comes to Chinese submarine numbers, and the number 6 has been floating around for a while. The US government has estimated that China had 6 active Type 094s (both variants) back in early 2021. However, in April 2021, an additional Type 094A was commissioned publicly by President Xi (a very rare occurrence for new PLAN ships), along with a Type 075 LHD and a Type 055 destroyer. So at the very least you now have 7 vessels, if the initial US assessment was accurate. Furthermore, a photo is available with what appears to be 4 of the original Type 094s in the same frame (although to be fair an old Type 092 can be easily mistaken for a 094), and we know from the PLAN footage I have shown in the video that there was at least two Type 94As in service. This again makes 6 boats at the start of 2021, assuming that PLAN hasn't upgraded the Type 094s into 094A. Plus the single newly commissioned 094A will again yield 7 boats. There are also more up-to-date western sources that estimate as many as 10 boats that are either in service or launched, and these are from fairly well-informed people. Personally, I consider 10 too high given the paucity of footages and other evidence, however. Anyway, sorry for the wall of text, and hopefully it illustrates where I got my 7-8 figure from.
@@EurasiaNaval please cite those sources. The 2021 CMPR from last Nov still had 6. USSTRATCOM/Admiral Richard has said multiple times this year there are only 6. The estimate you're referring to from early last year was already counting the last 094A that was about to be commissioned...
@@EurasiaNaval also both CN/eng wiki have it at 6 boats.
If you look up the third link under my references, it will show a breakdown of the photos the authors analysed of the Type 94. They estimated 8-10 boats. They even labelled their photo assessment of the submarines (persumably this includes the number of subs they quoted in each photo) as "indisputable data" - perhaps a case of bad translation from French, but the point stands that they are confident of their assessment. In the thread on SDF on the Type 093/094 submarines, the general feel I got from reading the posts is that people believe there are more than 6 boats. Also, just know I am trying to respond to a lot of comments from my phone, and its hard to link stuff on this device. I already put in a decent effort in the replies here, and I am totally fine if you are still not convinced. You can have your own opinion. Thanks again
It is known to several experts that the PLA subs diversity and strategies are this world's best and supported by unbeaten simulations. This will fortunately not be bragged by neither, PLA, allies nor adversaries. Quite lethal, thanks for the great visuals.
People of a certain age can't seem to shake the old stereotypes of Chinese quality.
old submarine use for crew training
Thanks for your research of little covered growing fleet. AIP allows affordable numbers.
Thanks for support
Chinese development in submarines is ongoing and cost reductions are achieved however both the USA and the UK have stagnated over the past decade.
With the new detection of deep diving submarines by listening to the exploding fine bubbles flowing off the hull the stealth of submarines which is the key issue in there detergent will be gone. With this detection the older noisey subs can be placed in the travel lines of the US /UK submarines and wait to ambush them. The effect of US attack class subs will be greatly reduced in a combat rol.
La marina de la RPCH sigue imparable en desarrollo y en número es un factor de equilibrio militar mundial...!!!
I know you would likely stay away from this topic, but can you make a video on the role the PLAN will play in the eventual attack on Taiwan? If not, at least make a video on the type 003
China doesnt need to attack Taiwan. Taiwan belongs to China.
Considering I'm from Taiwan, I rather not make that video, nor do I agree that an attack is "eventual". The Type 003, however, is an excellent topic
@@EurasiaNaval Taiwan is already invaded by US forces, China is next....
@@EurasiaNaval 能和平最好
@@EurasiaNaval always thought you were Australian from the accent. I hope more people in Taiwan can watch your videos and stop the illusion.
Usa wants them dead, they are not allies.
МОЖЕ БУТИ... ТЕЖ , ПРЕКРАСНО ...
Hi great videos about the army just keep it up, I wonder if you could make a video about Chinese tanks ??
Thanks for that - I don't do tanks, unfortunately. Perhaps one on amphibious tanks, but my topics are naval
@@EurasiaNavalI know this is an old comment but, I like the content that you produce and your style. Would you mind making a video on the Iranian and IRGC navies and their shipyards? Understandable if you don't want to.
The US CSIS ‘s study suggested by using nuclear submarine may help the US to win the war in Taiwan Straight.
So, China must solve this problem immediately!
And that study were also a joke.
Did you read it? the war game they played and concluded this?
Can you please do a video on Scorpène-class subs used by Brazil , Malaysia , India etc.
the 098 is the newest submaine
Comventional ships r good for only their nation protection not for attacking others
Hey, how come you don't have a video on the helicopter landing dock carrier ships?
Looks like china managed to strengthen their forces undersea, on the sea, sky and space. JIA U. Stop the bully from bullying again. Enough is enough.
Manufacturing more and more ñuclear submarines along entire coastliine. With hypersonic,missiles
China is currently the biggest producer of LFP batteries, thus will use them for a new class of Submarines, they also are building German copies of Diesel engines ( reversed engineered)for the Subs,
They need subs that can attack 50 miles inland to knock out coastal radar systems
Would you ever consider doing a video like this for the us navy submarine fleet
The taste of the pudding is in the eating.
P.L.A.N. are the largest naval forces in the world and until now still in secrecy
Well done China very powerful 093 Submarine. Built by China. 💪💪👍👍👏👏❤❤💯💯
how strong now? It does not matter much now. What matters is how fast the Chinese submarine force is growing. I, n not too distant future it will dwarf the combined submarine forces of the US and its allies.
I think you often over estimate Chinese military capality, a nation of copy cat kings how strong can they be?
The Americans said exactly the same thing about the Japanese in the 1980s.
Well thats what america said to Japan in the 1980’s
Be advised that the word "submariner" when spoken by submariners in the US Navy has the accent on the third syllable: sub ma REEN er. All others in the Navy and other services as well as civilians mispronounce it as you did in the video. For your info only.
Funny. If you’re the only ones who pronounce it the other way, what makes you think it’s the rest of the world that’s mispronouncing it? You’ve got that the wrong way round, old chap.
CHINA'S defence technology is modern & no. 1 ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🙏🙏🙏🙏
China is dependent on automation in their military, but very few of its military members know how to maintain these devices and many of China's military advanced hardware is out of service for repairs or upgrades.....
Are their Yuan class diesel submarines the ones that use German engines? They had some trouble selling one to Thailand which insisted on their sub having the original German engine instead of a Chinese made engine?
I don't believe the Yuan class uses the German engines. This is because the Germans stopped supplying their MTU 396 diesel engines for the previous Type 039 Song class, and China built the last few boats of that class with its domestic Shaanxi diesels. It wouldn't make sense for the Germans to supply new engines for the subsequent Yuan class, and China can make its own engines anyway. I won't speculate on why Thailand insists on China honouring its original contract to include a German engine. There's too much variables in that to spell out in a short comment.
As a country i wouldn't buy submarine made in China. Their highly secretive government kept development failures.several reports of crews trapped failing to surface.submarine operation is sophisticated, even on the engine used they could not copy german know how.any country who would buy its submarine at its own risk. See what happened to their fighter jet development.
Well in Taiwan we frequently had American made helicopters crashing and killing everyone inside, because they are low quality products that were bought for political reasons rather than having any practical value. A top general and his staff were killed a couple of years ago when his black hawk crashed. Our government should be suing the US for the lives their bad equipment had claimed.
@@EurasiaNaval at first this contract sign in junta era and RTN got pressure from junta to buy yuan class even all time RTN was go to learn know how in Germany which is the decision that make public opinion were suspecious and criticism navy hard even so navy try to still the project with hard lobbying in defense committee of parliament and hide many data to the public.In the topic of engine many times Chinese can use civilian sterling engine in thier submarine but with new green light coalition with green foreign minister had to sight on china and ban the engine export to china completely.
Right now , they have some rumors to give song class or use Chinese engine but it really hard to happen because submarine always watch by anyone and with a lot of scandal that expose in recent years so it is uneasy situation to continue the project without risk of government collapse.
Buying submarine in Thailand always negative in Thailand for two decades but choosing china submarine is going to the worst.
The deal like these was happen before with some surface ship that china make alot of that but submarine in that time alot of submarine proposal mostly new and never use or built such as China Korea Sweden (except Germany)
From current public opinion or may be parliament are more support to built another Korea frigate in Thailand for investment return benefits to Thai and submarine project must be cancelled nevertheless this fiasco hit relationship between RTN and china hard and ruin RTN in public eye alot as the most focus internal research and development brance of military in Thailand.
I won't suggest whether or not Thailand should buy this submarine - that is Thailand's decision. What I will say is that I don't think Thailand has actually made up its mind on what they want, because of the internal political situation, as you say. If Thailand doesn't want this submarine, it should just say that to China. Yes, there will be diplomatic consequences, but if Thailand want to cancel the deal anyway, it is better to say this now rather than later. China I am sure can use the submarine in its own navy, or sell to another country, so there is no lasting financial losses except a loss of face.
Do not say how strong just say how weak is the chinese navy submarine ,because china does not have any subs in any previous wars got it?
Don't ask go and find out, yourself
If they are rubbish, then nothing for the USA to fear about.
Like an old rusty truck driving down the road
Neither u nor i know how strong is chinese navy unless they r war proven...😂😂😂
China beat the shit out of US in Korean & Vietnam war without a navy and airforce. What do you think about now?
I’m gonna go out on a line and say that they’re not that good
You got that right.
Liked and shared the video. Wonderful as always. May buddha bless you 🙏
I'm honoured - much blessings to you too
Robot commentator ?
1-"місце"
I don't want ww3, but if it goes down we as humans will be scarred for life
My favorite transportation are F-18 block iii 😁👍🏻
Compro 500 submarinos dessa classe para a marinha do Brasil rio de janeiro
How difficult to dodge enemies torpedo in deep sea. Sea is much stronger and hard to to know where enemies are
U.S can pick up all chi-comms subs with satellites. And more
ПОКИ ЩО...
If they are as good as the bolts, nuts and wrenches they supply then good luck....because they'll all just fall apart
Lol . What you thought you'll get TUV certified bolt and nut and wrenches for 5 bucks . Get a life ashole
If cheapskates like you want to pay low price and expect quality ,better buy from your mom...btw
.what country u from ?
Dare not reveal out of shame ?
as with everything, it depends on what you buy. if you buy the cheapest of the cheapest, the quality will be bad.
most of my electronics(and probably yours) are made in china either partially or completely. so far i havent had any issues.
China is paper tiger. America should invade them!
💝😘👍🏻🫂🙋♀️
Know yourself and know your imaginary enemy.
You can be very good at math and very poor at warfare
Weh!!!
НОАК.🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳💪💪💪💪💪
Make a video on Indian submarines
Do you mean that Russian submarine?
@@tforaodg not all submarines are Russian like arihant claas, kalvari class , sindughosh class etc
You mean those communist made diving coffins ?
@@suyashpandya540 those are german and French . Theres nothing called 100% indian made submarine.
They are good enough to sneak into neighboring and regional backward countries territorial water without any detection, i would not be too surprised many of these countries are unaware when Chinese submarine sailed around their coastal water. Since they don't see it, they never know it ever happened. 👮🏼♂️👨🏼✈️
Chinese subs also sank a US sub months ago
Same applies to the devious USA.
Submarine copies of American counter part!!
😇❤❤
Propaganda of westerners........
Tofu. 🤣🤣🤣
Fix your debt first 💀 1.79 trillion
我国的ssbn已经世界第三了……？我是不是out了……
难道你认为在大连上海造了三艘航母这段时间，葫芦岛在放假？😂😜
你认为蓝星上有几个国家有SSBN ？？
我以为是五常吊车尾……
@@远山-k3s 能玩得起SSBN的也就3家了
五常都有的，英国有前卫级，法国有凯旋级，单从094的技术水平来说确实五常吊车尾，但是改型后的094B，以及传说中的096我倒觉得确实有一定可能性进前三。
(. КОМЕРЦІЯ...)
Tofu dreg submarines are no match for Arihant-class.
Jai Hind!
Oh.... So is india the villlage that call everything from china _tofu dreg_
Thanks Lindus, gud lak to meking _"Toilet"_
Comparatively, China’s submarines are lagging behind
Chinese junk!
Chaina 😂😂😂😂
ha.ha ha garbage
РОСІЙСЬКА КОМЕРЦІЯ !...
Tofu dreg Sub
Made in china. 🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪
이거 중국넘이 하는채널
Well of course it is, remember. Everyone has they’re own Biases, but this one doesn’t lie.
เรือใต้น้ำทันสมัยที่สุดของจีนคอมมิวนิสต์ เป็นแค่วัตถุโบราณของชาติตะวันตก
Thailand, country that can make you get imprisoned just because make a joke about king rama in public.
how many hate people needs to build this malefic machines..... I don't hate anyone.......❤❤❤❤
Just an advise, I suggest you not to use NATO codenames of PLA subs, those names are so ridiculous and unclear, at least for me.😐
I think it's worth mentioning the NATO codes for each submarine just once, for informational purposes, but I agree for an overview video like this, it is better to stick to the original Type 0XX name for all subsequent references for consistency, because there are many classes to cover and it is easy to get confused. For a video on just a single submarine class, I would feel OK with using the NATO and Chinese terms interchangeably. Feel free to disagree
@@EurasiaNaval Oh sorry, my point is that NATO codes of Chinese subs are somehow unreasonable and chaotic, like they just put all those subs together and randomly pick one of Chinese dynasty names to them and it always make me confused. Great video, my apology if you feel offensive🤢
No need to apologise - no offense was taken. Thanks for your support
You can fly on an American or European designed and built Aeroplane or a Chinese one. End message!
Go go china help Russia war with nato
Russia not at war with NATO, my dude
@@EurasiaNaval Russia is at war with ukraine, but behind all nato ukraine, it's the same as war with nato
Russia is fighting the US actually.
This is a example in the realm of adjudication of any tautological dichotomy without force or remorse as envisioned in the universal dynamic US Constitution devoid of race or religion for peace and harmony as an honor system to be heaven on earth finally! So, keep hope alive only! Hahahahahar!
A lots of people don't know that submarine don't need engine to move. Underwater current can actuarially move one to three knots. Though I like the image of submarine in river.
water noise in river are way nosier than the ocean, it make Chinese subs seems quiet.