@@lovespeaks777 in your 1.5 minute video? "it's not meant to be comprehensive, it's meant to be concise." then don't try to disprove every major religion. make a video that actually has effort put into it, rather than just denying other people's beliefs.
@@nicholascarver1 or they could all be wrong. we don't know. let other's practice what they want, and you practice what you want. hate is not a required component of your religion
@@lovespeaks777 I have, and I do in fact believe in God. I think that your argument in this video was incredibly poor. Saying that you’re providing proof and then telling your viewers to find the evidence themselves is a terrible way to argue anything, not to mention that the thing you’re arguing is as monumental as the existence of God. In all honestly, I would rather watch an hour long video where you lay out all of the philosophical and historical evidence than a minute long video where you tell your viewers to figure it out themselves.
@@gothamwarriorI think informative videos are good, but this wasn’t meant to be comprehensive considering it’s a minute long. It has helped us to engage with many and dialogue about religions and God, so that’s a win. We have other videos that go over arguments for God’s existence and theology and are way more in depth than this one
@@lovespeaks777The one minute limit is a self imposed handicap that makes the job impossible while giving you a convenient excuse why it wasn't very good. Let me convince you christianity is false with just one letter: A. Doesn't really work, does it?
@@chlorophyllphileI don’t have to prove that God exists-He has already shown Himself to the creation. People are free to deny Him, but we’re trying to have good conversations because of the importance of this topic.
@@lovespeaks777 What arguments? Ontological? Moral? Most of these arguments are just some kind of idealism. The ontological argument is an example, because the existence of a 'perfect' idea does not mean the existence of a 'perfect' thing in the material world. An idea NEVER creates a substance, it is the substance that, in itself, creates the idea. Furthermore, the “existence of God” is not my point. My criticism goes to the idea that you can prove that Christianity is the truth, when in fact you can't without necessarily using Christian sources, and, as I said, trying to prove that in your video, you use the "petitio principii" fallacy, where the aim is to demonstrate the truth in the conclusion of the argument, assuming that this same conclusion is true and employing this assumption in one of the premises.
@@timidtlkMany non-Christian sources say Jesus died under the hands of the Romans, was buried in a private tomb, the tomb was empty, and Jesus’ followers believed they had seen Him risen after 3 days. Doesn’t mean you have to believe this, but the best explanation for the empty tomb and Jesus’ post mortem appearances is that He did raise from the dead. Also, to say we can’t prove anything about God or Jesus by using the Bible doesn’t make any sense. If we have written sources about an event that are close to the time period of its occurrence, why wouldn’t we consider them?
@@lovespeaks777 Dude, if it even happened. it would have been around 2000 years ago. there is no way in hell you can prove the legitimacy of those claims. especially since they are all eyewitness claims.
but you also need to tell the truth with the non-biblic sources: the other religions themselves. artifacts from the world itself, or maybe parts of the Tanakh, such as the Torah. or maybe other sources of information that could INDIRECTLY tell the presence of a god. you can prove SOMETHING about god using the bible, but other sources are important, too.
I'm Christian myself, but I don't feel like this video is gonna convince non-Christians. Edit: Can you all stop trying to convince me to be atheist? LIke cool, if you want to be atheist, you can be, but let people believe in their religions.
As an ex-Christian, I can confirm that it had wayyy too many assumptions to convince anyone except practicing Christians. You don't need a magical suicide trick to make a semitic deity no longer want to torture you when you die. Suicide, in that, after yahweh's entrapment in Eden, every human apparently deserved to burn in hell forever (original sin). He sends himself in human form, somehow becoming his own son from his own holy seed, and he's now on earth with a specific mission to get himself killed. That's a form of suicide-by-cop, and he did this to trick himself into no longer wanting to torture us in the afterlife. But this Willy Wonka golden ticket is only redeemable if you believe in the magic trick and let him enter your heart.
@@lovespeaks777 have yo? your evidence is primarily the bible, which has not been proven to be a valid source. eyewitness accounts from anonymous sources? could have been made up.
That is just foolish. I can tell you, atheist. You're not even secular to begin with, because even secular scholars approve biblical facts. Search up the 'Dead Sea Scrolls' which were discovered before the year 2000, documenting things that were way before Jesus, and way before the Israel nation, that you will read in later Old Testament books before Jesus. They matched up with the previous texts. Secular documents and accounts confirm things that the Bible has said about a historic group of people, places and events. Such as the Pirate, Babylon, the ruined temple, claims of a Messiah and his disciples. Never forget the wide spread of Christianity.It's literally been proven, and it continually is. It's not even a book that fell from Heaven. It's real things that did happen and are continually being confirmed. it seems to be, that you don't want the Bible to be true. As an excuse to live your own life, and find a reason not to believe in God. This my friend, is storing up wrath for yourself on Judgement Day. It's pure ignorance and not even an open mind. There's evidence for the Christian Bible, and I know this now, as I haven't been a Christian all my life.@@zxc-e1112
Change the title to: I'm too lazy to fully explain my case and learn about other religions so instead I will make baseless statements with little context for one minute. I've never seen someone so insecure about their religion before.
@@lovespeaks777 Go on, do a full form video explaining your case and I will make a proper rebuttal if I believe your points are flawed, unless of course, you are afraid of a little research. You are probably just a rage baiter which is why you couldn't be bothered to put effort in, just like your religion, you don't need to put any effort in. "Oh I'm so sorry lord please forgive me for raping a Muslim girl!" "Oh you're all right mate come on up here to heaven! She wasn't Christian anyway why would I care?"
Rebutting your video is very easy, because you don't disprove other religions wrong. You just say other religions are wrong because my religion says so. We could use the same argument to prove Hinduism as being the true religion. This is how stupid you argument is. @@lovespeaks777
No your video is weak, accept it instead of letting your ego take over just like it did to satan. Your whole video can be summarized like this : other religions dont agree with the bible therefore they are wrong. Hindus could say the same thing about the bible not agreeing with their book, doesn't make hinduism true. @@lovespeaks777
That is a misunderstanding of the Trinity. 1. There is one God. 2. There are 3 distinct persons who are God: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. 3. The Father is not the Son or the Holy Spirit; The Son is not the Father or the Holy Spirit; The Holy Spirit is not the Father or the Son. 4. God is three persons in one essence, not three essences in one essence.
@@lovespeaks777 if you asked 3 Christians to explain the trinity you will get 4 different answers every time you repeat the question. And this the most important thing in the religion the concept of God
@@lovespeaks777 you re just repeating what the nician creed says. How there are one and each one is fully God . Why the is father is the only one who is all knowing and many many many explicit passages in the Bible indicate that the father is the only God. Try again
@@battekyake6107You have to investigate the text. Several considerations are, did the writers speak about the geography, laws, culture, leaders, etc correctly? Did they tell the story as fiction or non-fiction? I don’t mind being skeptical of the Bible, but I have no reason to believe it isn’t true. The creed in 1 Corinthians 15 about Jesus dying, being buried and being raised the third day was as early as 5 years after it happened and the gospels record this happening.
@thatdefaulty Did you watch the whole video? All religions contradict one another so they can’t all be right at the same time. Do you have some arguments for your beliefs?
@@lovespeaks777oh really? It can also be a possibility that Hinduism, Islam and Judaism is true and christianity is false? If they are really contradicting each other, how are you so sure that only christianity exist?
@@Gilbert.Suhendra that's what I am saying, according to this video he is saying that all other religion are wrong and christianity is true, see the thumbnail. I am just saying that it can also be a possibility that other religion are true and christianity can be false.
There are so many flaws in this argument 1) Only 4 monotheistic religions: Sikhism, Zoroastrianism, Many sects of Hinduism are monotheistic as well as many other religions, narrowing it down to 4 is actually crazy 2) Different views on Jesus: This is probably my biggest problem with the argument: You havent said why it has to be Jesus for the religion's moral/truthful merit. Christians can be happy and praise Jesus to the core but so can Muslims with Muhammad, Sikhs with Guru Nanakh, Hindus with Krishnaji, Zoroastrians with Zoroaster. They all have central figures of their own religions. 3) Just because a lot of people testify to something doesn't make it automatically true, because a man rising from the dead is the most paranormal thing known to mankind, if it was real. Eyewitness accounts aren't a shred of evidence for such a bold claim made over 2000 years ago. Also Christianity, Islam, Judaism, all reject evolution which has much more evidence supporting it than some sky-figure controlling heavens and earth from above. Christian priests and Muslim apologists so radically oppose this theory when its clear they know nothing about it. Lastly, don't tell people to "read the Bible for themselves" when you haven't read a Qur'an, Granth Sahib, Gita, Sutra, or a textbook in depth yourself while making such bold claims on other's religions. The lack of knowledge you had about these religions and vague superficial understanding of them, which is why people are thrashing on you in the comments. Clearly only christians themselves here are affirming your argument. You have every right to praise your own religion but don't be commenting on other religions as if you have some platform to stand on with some dude being nailed to a stick. EDIT: pls stop replying ☠
@@lovespeaks777 Im aware. My main point besides your inaccuracies is that you have every right to praise your own religion, but looking down on OTHER religions when you know legit know NOTHING about them is my problem here.
@@butterfingers60 You’re making a lot of assumptions here. It’s a good thing to judge whether things are right or wrong, like other religions. The first thing I saw when I opened a Koran was kill those who wage war against Allah and his messenger. I judged that right away, and I judged it to be wrong. When religions say things like inflict harm on other people or only care about yourself, I would say they are wrong. And you assumed I didn’t know anything about other religions, yet I showed the difference between 4 in the video.
@@lovespeaks777 Well, the key differences you highlighted were their views on Jesus, so as a Christian it would make sense for you to understand their stances, but that doesn't prove whether they're right or wrong. And can you send me a single verse from the Torah saying Christians are infidels? Jews came before Christians so thats not possible. Someone could judge Christianity for sending non-Christians to hell, in many views that doesnt seem very fair.
Do you trust what the Koran says about Jesus’ death, burial, and resurrection when it was written 600 years after the events? If so, why would you dismiss what the N.T. says when it was written within the generation of the eyewitnesses?
@@lovespeaks777 The Quran was not "written" 600 years after the events, it is a revelation from god so it does not matter at what place or time was the Quran revealed because once you establish the belief that it is the word of god ( which is what muslims believe) it does not matter at what place or time was the Quran revealed. Furthermore, the N.T is a writing of man, wether you're a muslim or christian you should still accept the fact that the N.T is the word of man, Mark, Luke, John and Matthew in specific. You have even used it as a source/evidence against islam despite muslims not believing it is the word of god. Now that we established this, muslims could make the decision to convert to christianity, which can possibly mean eternal life in heaven but also eternal life in hell. Muslims or any religious group shouldn't logically make a decision that can lead them to eternal punishment in hell based on a man made book (The New Testament) as it is prone to error and corruption which have been proven countless times by textual critics. It is also known that the new testament was not really a historical book but rather a theological book so the writers would have no problem adding false historical events as long as it is consistent with their theological beliefs which has also been confirmed by bible scholars if you do your research. The argument that we should accept it as it was written in the generation of the eyewitnesses is like saying we can accept any source in the 1940s about the world war since it was written in its time period, pretty inconsistent isn't it?
He didn’t say anything for you to convert 🤡 . He only said what he believed, unlike a terrorist will always stay a true terrorist so what to even expect from a terrorist 😘
He didn’t say anything for you to convert 🤡 . He only said what he believed, unlike a ter::ist will always stay a true ter::ist so what to even expect from a ter::ist 😘
I’ll admit, I did present information quickly. When studying the arguments for God’s existence, you end up with a monotheistic God. I think the arguments are very good and are the best explanation for the creation, design, and sustaining of the universe, and for objective moral truths. The counter arguments to these I find to be illogical and not scientific.
@@lovespeaks777 it may be an unfamiliarity with certain ideas and philosophies, but someone from an eastern background may argue that in fact a non dualist position is the most logical and consistent with observable reality.
Why do you think you have to study God's existence? God is not comprehensible by the rational mind. That might be the fatal flaw. God is not a singular entity nor is it many entities. It is human hybris that strives to rationalize God. By arguing the way you do, you are disconnecting yourself from oneness.
We reason from effect to cause. Because we don’t see God, we investigate the effects of His work. For example: Because we have a universe, we can conclude two things about it: either nothing created it or something did. Can nothing create something? No, so we rule out nothing could have created the universe. The other option is something created the universe. What attributes would you have to have to be able to create the universe? You’d have to be extremely powerful, (able to create matter and energy) intelligent, (ingeniously ordering everything that works and sustains in this universe) space less, (you cannot occupy the space of something you’re creating or you’d be in the way, also you cannot exist inside of something that doesn’t exist yet) timeless, (if you caused the origin of time, there wouldn’t be time before you created it) eternal, (if you are timeless, then you wouldn’t have a beginning, which would make you eternal) and personal, only minds makes decisions (decision to create and design, and a mind can only make a mind). Who fits those attributes? God.
You're trying to put human attributes onto God, which shows me the narrowness of christian thinking. You are conflating our desire to explain stuff with actual spiritual knowledge which always has been and will be timeless. It also shows your very recent human perception of time as linear, requiring it to have a beginning. The universe, God, has always existed in and as everything. There was no creation in the sense of genesis. When you start understanding the universe, how it's laws work, you will find out how limiting and therefore even blasphemous your perception of God is. The universe is constant renewal or in our interpretation creation. Just trying to rationalize God is like trying to make the fish in the tank understand that the moon is a big rock 300000 km away from earth. Religions have been control Instruments keeping us far from God. Now to single out one of them and saying this is truth and everything else is wrong is both arrogant and foolish. And of course trying to put human attributes onto God shows how limited your spiritual experience is.
He died because He was fully man and fully God. Early Christian’s did believe He died on the cross. Research the creed in 1 Corinthians 15. It’s dated very early and talks about Jesus dying on the cross. Also, why should we trust the Koran about Jesus’ life and crucifixion, which was written 600 years after the events?
@@lovespeaks777 so according to your logic, a man can be god and human at the same time, but god cant die because he is immortal, but this person is half man half god and he died, god sacrificed god to save people from god's punishement, god asked god for help but god refused to help god, then god resurrected jesus which is god which means god resurrected himself, bible says god is immortal but it also says that god was crucified, so many contradictions that would crucify your braincells
@@lovespeaks777no where in the Bible says that but it says Jesus was a man appointed by God Jesus never claimed to God y'all and deceived by Satan because only Satan is the author of confusion hence the Bible is full of confusion and errors and is definitely the works of Satan 👿
@tremcin It actually hasn’t. Many like to say this, but it’s not true. Even Bart Ehrman, a textual critic and agnostic that debates Christians on various topics, said this: “Bruce Metzger is one of the great scholars of modern times, and I dedicated the book to him because he was both my inspiration for going into textual criticism and the person who trained me in the field. I have nothing but respect and admiration for him. And even though we may disagree on important religious questions - he is a firmly committed Christian and I am not - we are in complete agreement on a number of very important historical and textual questions. If he and I were put in a room and asked to hammer out a consensus statement on what we think the original text of the New Testament probably looked like, there would be very few points of disagreement - maybe one or two dozen places out of many thousands. The position I argue for in ‘Misquoting Jesus’ does not actually stand at odds with Prof. Metzger’s position that the essential Christian beliefs are not affected by textual variants in the manuscript tradition of the New Testament.”
@@lovespeaks777 "That's not true, because despite all the evidence that it is, and the thousands of people who tell me it is, I found one source for a questionably intelligent/informed/honest guy who said nuh-uh" Is a very fitting argument from you
@@Random_LurkerI chose to cite a skeptic that debates Christians and tries to change religious people’s minds because he does read the actual text of the Bible. Of course we have many religious or Christian textual critics as well that can tell you that the text hasn’t changed. You can read everything we have and see how much it varies. The evidence is there, but many ignore it because they don’t want it to be true
@@JesusIsTheWord11If you want to reject the Bible and it’s teachings, you are free to do that. But to say the variants have changed the message into something we can’t be sure of is just not true. I can agree to disagree
how do you know jesus resurrected ? we know that jesus resurrected because it says in the bible how do you know that the bible is true ? the bible is true because jesus resurrected in it how do you know jesus resurrected ? we know that jesus resurrected because it says in the bible how do you know that the bible is true ? the bible is true because jesus resurrected in it
How do I know Jesus was never put in a tomb? When Rome crucified you, you were left to rot, fall to pieces, and be eaten by scavengers. That was part of the punishment. To be denied a proper burial. How do I know Rome did that? HISTORY CLASS! Your turn.
Btw A real theologian will know these: Christianity & Judaism "The first of all the commandments is, 'Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God, the Lord is One! "(Mark 12:28-29 : Deuteronomy 6:1).* *Islam Say: He is Allah, The One and Only. (Al-Qur'an 112:1)* *Hinduism He is One without a second. (Chandogy Upanishad 6:2:1)* *Sikhism There is but One God whose name is true,, who is called The True, The Creator. (Sri Guru Granth Sahib, vol: 1 , Japuji verse; 1)* *Zoroastrians (Parsis) He is One. He is without an Origin or end. He has no father or mother, wife or son. (Dasatir, Ahura Mazda)*
He never going to reply this let alone actually reading all versions of Bible especially those in original semantics language. I read the Quran,the Torah, the Psalms, the Gospel,the I-Ching ,the Tipitaka,The Vedas from cover to cover and After reading everything, I realized that there is no difference .ONE GOD☝️It's not a competition, it's the understanding of Divine Truth.
0:08 Deism isn't a religion... But Zoroastrianism is! Also, what ruled out Bahaism or New Age, or plain old monotheistic spirituality in general, just out of curiosity? Further, the "eyewitness testimonies" you are claiming here are probably mostly from Paul, and if someone from 2,000 years ago says that they touched Jesus (or anyone else, for that matter) after he had died and he was alive, take it with a HUGE grain of salt. Actually, if someone (such as Paul) says that SOMEONE ELSE said that they saw Jesus walking around after he died? Take it with at least two gigantic grains of salt!
I'm not able to know if you agree or disagree the video lol But Paul was not the only eyewitness. We have writings by Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, in the gospels and Acts (written by Luke), and also writings by Peter and James, in their epistles (not counting the author of Hebrews, who we don't know). Moreover, these books mention many people who saw the resurrected Jesus. In the gospels, in Acts, in epistles. To women, to the apostles, to a crowd. 500 people in total (1 Corinthians 15:6). All these people and others died because they said "Jesus lives", and can't be possible that they all chose die to profess a lie. The only one who survived was John, who was kept until his death in exile, where he wrote the Revelation. So we can affirm: Christ lives!
@@calebewilliams5202 you stated a whole lot of non sequiturs and things that you couldn't possibly know there. For starters, the assumed author of Revelation is John of Patmos who is NOT the same apostle John who supposedly wrote the Gospel of John. Further, *none* of the 4 gospels were likely written by the people who have their names attributed to them. The fact that their titles imply that they did, like most or all of the other things you said, is an unsubstantiated claim, and in no way, shape, or form evidence or proof that those were the actual authors. And the claim of 500 witnesses is also just a completely unsubstantiated claim, not that it would particularly, necessarily matter anyway. Baha'is will say that there were *thousands* of witnesses to the supposed supernatural events that surrounded one of their prophet's deaths - the Bab's. And I think there were thousands of witnesses. Would you believe *them* if I told you that story? Because it most likely happened. In my understanding there are newspaper articles from the 19th century about it, but nothing about it was likely to have been supernatural. And people can and do lay down their lives, knowingly even, for something that is a lie. The Coronavirus deniers who were in critical condition in hospitals saying - on their deathbeds - that it's a "fake virus" took their denial with them to their graves.
@@wormwood822 Sorry, you're last statement😂I just can't. Obviously it was an actual sickness, because people got sick, but there was an immense amount of deception from the government, social media, news, hospitals, and renown medical organizations saying that masks "help", the vaccine is "safe and effective", social distance and stay home because you know, covid won't wander father than 6ft from you🙄 Yet all of this was complete bonkers and totally contradicted common sense and hundreds of major studies debunking these lies. Not only that, but the amount of nurses and doctors diagnosing covid to people who, in reality, were not sick at all, or had a completely different sickness is a very large number. They would even say the cause of death was covid... for people who got in car accidents. This is literally true. My dad, in fact, was a big whistle blower and reporter during those years. He produced his own documentary called "Following the Science?" that got around 2M views. Billions of people were probably brainwashed and fooled by sites like CNN. Believe me, we've done our research, I hope you don't believe in the deceit that was so blatantly enforced.
@@furkanunsal5814 deism isn't a religion, similar to how theism and atheism aren't religions. Deism is the belief in a God that doesn't intervene or act in any way that we can detect. Many of the Founding Fathers of the United States were deists.
I can appreciate that condensing an argument into one minute means skipping over a lot of steps, though I would say Hindusim isn't technically polytheistic. Generally it's understood as a polymorphic monotheism, in that the Devas (gods in the lowercase 'g' sense) are created beings within the universe, whereas the Godhead Brahman (which is also Atman, the one Self of all things) is the ultimate principle of reality, and so God in the proper sense. This is a somewhat similar distinction to the Greek word theos, which is a lowercase god, vs the proper term Ho theos (or O theos as there appears to be no h in Greek), which is God in the fullest sense. I wouldn't be too quick to dismiss the Buddhist Brahma or the Tao either, as they bear some similarities to Christian apophatic ideas of God. I've heard that one Chinese Bible even uses the word Tao as a substitute for Logos (the Word in the prologue of John), as it carries many of the deep connotations.
@Skin_Man Thanks for the comment. If Jesus is God, He said some things that would make other religions false. He said no one comes to the Father except by Him. If Jesus wasn’t God, that statement wouldn’t be a problem, but if He proved His divinity by His resurrection from the dead, then what He says is truth
@@lovespeaks777 You're definitely right that not all religions can be 100% true (at least taking them at their most literal level), but it is interesting to find deep synchronicity between their most fundamental tenants. I'm pretty sure many of the early Church fathers maintained that God had given partial revelation to all people (and I think Paul hints at this too), because God continually draws all to himself. Humans, wherever we are, are continually reaching toward the transcendent. Religio (Latin, not a typo), was considered a virtue that all people possessed. In my understanding, all come to God through Christ because Christ ultimately is the bridge between humanity and divinity. Christ took upon the sin and estrangement of the world, overpowering it and making it possible for man to enter into the divine life. In the words of St. Athanasius, God became man so that man might become God. While other faiths have deep truths to them, Christianity holds the fullness of that truth (even if we are only encountering it in a veiled form, suitable to our weakness, and not yet face-to-face).
@@Skin_ManYea, there is definitely some moral truth in probably most or all religions. That seems to be where there is overlap. But Jesus definitely proved His divinity with what He said and did. Jesus is king!
@@lovespeaks777"If Jesus is God..." That is begging the question. If jesus is god, of course christianity is true. The question is whether that was the case, and there is no solid evidence for it.
@@lovespeaks777 Now you understand why Christian civilizations had to be maintain through fear and terror of the church. Forced lies and oppression of the truth. Once such thing could no longer be deployed successfully the Christian numbers started to decline and you have Politian's who attempt the same thing to remain in power or attempt to create forced ideologies. Races can never be recreated after being destroyed unlike religions that can be switched out and back in like brands of underwear.
In the Gospel According to St. Matthew chapter 19 verse 17 Jesus says "why do you call me good, there is none good but God". This clearly shows that Jesus considered himself different from and much less than God. I would very much to hear the author of this posting explain how he knows more about God than Jesus.
@rogeraffleck8677 I disagree. Jesus knew the person didn’t think He was deity because He called Him a “good teacher.” Jesus was correcting Him by asking “why would call someone you think is merely human good?”
Read what Jesus’ response to the Sanhedrin was when He was arrested and then read the passages He quotes in the O.T. in response, and tell me Jesus didn’t think He was deity
I agree with this. I have heard about when Jesus was on the cross, a guard was shoving something on Jesus's face and God wanted to kill him; but Jesus stopped God from doing the action and spared the mans life. I have no idea how people think Jesus and God are the same.
@@Funtime_Fzexcalty 💯 and remember Jesus was crying in the cross God to save him from humiliation based on the prayer he made in the garden and acts 2:32 literally said God saved Jesus and holy spirit lifted him to heaven and Jesus received the promise God made in the old testament that Jesus will saved 😂
Hey man, this video is kind of just, "Christianity is right, because the bible and written accounts." The same logic could apply to SO many religions... we all have our own beliefs, and reasons for those beliefs. Don't discredit other religions for the same reasons you use to credit your own, I don't really have any stance on whether God is real or not, but this argument definitely hasn't swayed me one way or the other. Edit: Saw you say, "Christianity says Jesus died on the cross, and Islam says He never did. Can both of the statements be true at the same time?" So I ask you, why are you assuming that YOUR argument is the truth here? It seems to me like you are being close-minded and assuming YOUR truth to be THE truth, without TRULY considering the possibilities.
Yea, this is why you have to do your research. Islam says Jesus didn’t die on the cross and this was written in the Koran 600 years after the event. The N.T. says Jesus did die on the cross and it was written within the generation of the eye witnesses. What would be a more reliable source?
@@lovespeaks777 neither. When something has happened so long ago, we just can’t be sure. When we go to explain the past and the birth of the universe, somewhere down the line we have to assume something, whether that’s that god always existed, or that literally anything else always existed. Now that I think about it, the very first thing you do in this video is assume that there is only one god because of sources you don’t even list. I don’t think it’s impossible for god to exist, just improbable. In fact, I think every belief and religion is unlikely to be true, because we just don’t have advanced enough technology to just, “check”. Again, I have my reasons for my beliefs, and everyone else does too. My critique of this video isn’t because of you defending your beliefs, it’s putting down other beliefs without equal consideration.
@@sillybillyrealnotfakeCan we be sure that Washington was president? That Alexander The Great really existed? Did Mark Twain really write his books? Either there is a God or not. If there is one, then not every religion can be right about Him because they all contradict one another. And 2+2=4 has one right answer and millions of wrong ones. That’s why 1 religion can be true and the rest false
LOL. Only an arrogant religious fanatic would even try to disprove (or prove) one religious denomination is superior to another! For your ignorance I applaud you sir!
@jschneider8873 No, I started with the arguments for God's existence, which are very strong and prove God exists. Then, from there you can investigate to see if any religions are reliable and cohesive with that data.
@@jschneider8773Sure, let’s start with my favorite. Because there is objective evil, there has to be objective good. Since humans aren’t objectively good, the source of this goodness would transcend humans. It would also transcend the universe because the universe isn’t conscious or inherently good. What could this objective and unchanging good be that transcends humans and the universe? God
If you want to be Christian that’s fine. Don’t act like you are using logic or evidence when proving its validity. One book says Jesus was god. You can’t use the claims in that book to prove the books validity as evidence. If you’re response to that is “many other sources agree” then I challenge you to remake this video without using bible quran or other religious texts. Just use the other evidence and sources and run this back. Do you need the Bible to prove Jesus was god or can you do it without it?
@@lovespeaks777 do you have the courage to answer my question? You made an assertion, I asked a question. Can you try to answer it? You asking me a related but irrelevant question doesn’t help. I’ll answer. Yes. Alexander has immense evidence written or otherwise. any significant portion of it can be used to determine Alexander was real and existed. None of the evidence references supernatural. I didn’t ask if Jesus existed. I asked: can you prove Jesus was god without the Bible? If you don’t attempt to answer that authentically I can’t continue the discussion.
They didn’t have a N.T. when they believed Jesus was God. And I’m not going to just say the Bible isn’t reliable when it has been tested and tried and passed the test. I don’t need the Bible to say God exists-He has proven His existence through the creation and our conscience. But to know Jesus is God and to know His teachings require a text passed down from after He was a man on earth.
bible is not proof as it simply states claims and refuses to back them up. what you have stated in the bible is something almost every religion does, make claims and not prove them. however we can disprove certain claims that the bible does make, those being god is all loving and all powerful. with all of the death and horrible things that happen in the world due to natural causes, children dying who will be sent to hell because they were part of another religion is not ever loving, now you could make the claim that god is unable to intervene, however it is also stated that god is all powerful, and thus choses to have these things happen to people who do not deserve it. It is also stated that god rested on the 7th day thus proving he has limits to what he is able to do. Now not only do I find it bizarre how much this personifies what is supposedly a tridimensional deity that takes no form, to even suggest that a concept that only is innate to that of lifeforms would apply to a deity that is said to take no form is bizarre to me.@@lovespeaks777
@@trixsisdeadThe Bible and non-biblical sources say Jesus existed, died under Roman crucifixion, was buried by a Jewish man named Joseph of Arimethea, the tomb was empty 3 days later, there were appearances of Him 3 days after His burial, and His followers were convinced He was raised from the dead against what their religion taught. What’s your explanation of the resurrection of Christ?
@@lovespeaks777 That's not proof. It's wrong to present your opinion as fact, people who do such things persistently (like yourself) can come off as untrustworthy. Your not giving me anything of substance here, so either do that or don't bother.
@mohammadalbaghdadi1456 Jesus died for our sins to reconcile us back to God. It shows how loving God is and what He would go through to save us. Simply amazing
@@gregsmith8977 so how can you prove that aristotle was real? because of the EYE WITNESSES. same way the eye witnesses saw jesus, and the same way they died while saying jesus was God.
I notice a trend in modern society that tries to make Christian intentions to be good moral teachings. The road to Hell is paved with good intentions. We’re not here to be distracted by what’s on this Earth, our Lord suffered for our sake but not out of accident. Our sins and actions are so bad we had God nailed to a cross just to even give us a fighting chance. This is a daily battle that starts with our minds, we must deny ourselves daily, pray daily, love each other (yes even our enemies) daily and spread the Gospel daily.
So you're right and everyone who isn't just like you is wrong. Congratulations! Why don't you give us a heads up once you've convinced the entire world to be just like you. Because this is what God commands that you do.
Thanks for the comment. 2+2=4. It has one right answer and bazillions of wrong answers. Let me know what you think of this: th-cam.com/video/mDz8sYTH5fg/w-d-xo.html
@@vs-vh4sgDid He die on the cross according to your view? Was He resurrected? That’s what the Bible says, which was written within the generation of the eyewitnesses.
@@lovespeaks777 Your Holy Book is distorted, and the evidence is that the people who transmitted it, about whom we know nothing, may be lying, unlike the Qur’an, which is the only book that was transmitted as it was revealed from God. The Qur’an says that Jesse was not crucified, but rather God raised him to heaven until the end of time
@Decton Let’s say the Bible was all made up, which I don’t believe is reasonable, the arguments for God’s existence would still be strong. If you haven’t studied them, I would check them out
@@lovespeaks777 god is just a made up thing to believe in because we as people wouldn't have much else to hold on also, if this god exists why would we be able to believe in other religions and why would it be our destiny to get his view across since he's a god, he could do anything, so why do it like this, this is so fucking stupid lol
@@Decton you must understand that God is not logical, we cannot understand why everything, but we can with the our hearth have a relationship whith him (sorry for bad english ha ha)
@@user-jh3ze8or2hso god is not logical and thus we don't know his motives, but our heart can? The thing that pumps Oxygen rich blood through our veins?
@@lovespeaks777okay but the Bible contradicts itself. So that means all religion is debunked. Which makes sense cause everyone agrees the earth millions if not billions of years old. Meaning the Bible is false. One wrong fact disproves the rest of the writing does it not? If we have a math book but know that one of the methods is incorrect but can't prove the rest right or wrong, we don't consider it to be a source. Therefore that would prove the Bible to be an unreliable source. There are other facts I can state but I don't feel the need to.
@@lovespeaks777 No and forgive me for the snarky comment. You might call me an optimistic Faithist, or one who believes in a spiritual gestalt but tries very hard not to attribute too much to it. I know I will die and only get the gist of our place in the universe (and meta-universe) and I don't get bent out of shape knowing that I do not know (as a single person) very much. In religion there is this gigantic hubris of pretending to know when only perhaps 5% is actually accurate and on the right path.
@@lovespeaks777 Jesus (and Buddha, Krishna...) are what might be called highest-good metaphorical condensates or exemplars. They are not there to be worshiped, they are formed out of the collective unconscious onto paper as an example of what is possible for each person. Holy documents should never be taken literally, only metaphorically. They are signposts, not recipes.
Can you make this argument drawing from evidence and sources outside the Bible? If not, you've not really proven anything but that a man-made collection of text has specific words in it.
the question isn't "what makes the bible unreliable?", the question is "why is the Bible more reliable than other written sources?" also, the bible is unreliable because it was written by people. and people don't always speak the truth
"If you study the arguments for God's existence, you end up with a monotheistic God" But who originated the cosmological argument? The furthest back we know is Aristotle, who was indeed a monist (believing in a supreme being), but also a devout polytheistic worshipper of the Greek Gods like all around him. The cosmological argument is a pagan argument made originally to other pagans. Monism =/= monotheism: it was common for many polytheistic cultures to believe in a supreme being (including also the Canaanites, who worshipped El, and the pre-Islamic Arabs who worshipped Allah the creator, and most polytheistic Hindus who worship Brahman, etc.). The defining characteristic of monotheism has never been the belief in a supreme being, but belief in the jealousy of that being.
@EdricoftheWeald Here is a deductive argument of why there must be a monotheistic God. 1. God is defined as a perfect being. 2. To be perfect is to lack nothing. 3. No two beings are identical. 4. This means that one must lack something the other possesses. 5. The one that lacked something would not be perfect, and therefore, not be God. 6. Therefore, one can only be God.
@@lovespeaks777 Thank you but there is a linguistic misunderstanding. For thousands of years in all parts of the world except Judea/Israel, a "god/deus/theos/gudanaz/kami/ilah" was never conceived of as a perfect being, or even a particular class of beings, but any spirit that is honoured in order to create a relationship between people and the universe they lived in. For the Romans there were thousands of small gods in any forest or village. Gods were seen as forces of nature, and they didn't have to be moral guides (the Greeks certainly didn't want to imitate their gods), and just like the universe is imperfect, they embodied that imperfection and gave them a way to reconcile with it on a personal level. Aristotle's argument applies well to a perfect supreme being (which may or may not be called God depending on the culture), but it's a misunderstanding to put the Abrahamic view of of the word "God" or "Deity" (assumed to be a perfect and almighty being) as if it were majority view of history. On a different note, there is an issue with 4.-6., as it implies the essence of divinity cannot exist in different persons: if it doesn't imply that, and permits trinitarianism, then it just as well permits one of the Hindu views of all deities being persons of Brahman. Or the Wiccan view that all goddesses are one Goddess, all gods are one God, and that both are dual aspects of one supreme being, perfect in ways that seem imperfect because we cannot see.
@@EdricoftheWealdI would say that when you study the arguments for God’s existence you end up with an extremely powerful, intelligent, personal, good being. There are problems with thinking several gods made everything and sustain it all. If they were at all in disagreement, things wouldn’t sustain as they do. And then what god made the earth? What god made humans? What god is sustaining this universe? Are they all objectively morally good?
This is a bit of a cherry pick, since you're only using one gospel to make your point. If you want to strengthen your point you need to account for the differences the gospels entail. I don't mean this as an insult. Merely as constructive criticism.
@@lovespeaks777I re-watched the video and realized I was only rebutting a small snippet of the video, not the entire argument. Makes my argument a bit disingenuous. Got tunnel vision, my bad.
Some bronze age shepherds said they totally saw Jesus after he was dead, so it must be true, one hundred percent. ONE HUNDRED PERCENT! No bronze age barbarians ever lied to anyone, or wrote down a story centuries after everyone involved had died that turned out to be untrue. Boom! Proof that Christianity is sane and totally believable.
And so we shouldn’t trust anything that was written down that we haven’t seen with our own eyes? Washington wasn’t president, Alexander the Great didn’t exist, etc.
We shouldn't trust documents that attest to impossible events, no. It's amazing that I have to say something like this to living Americans. I mean, don't you have ANY capacity to resist believing in bullshit? It blows my nmind.
@@lovespeaks777 It's impossible for a man to be tortured and die of exposure on a cross, and then for that man a few days later to chit chat with people all around town. Either he wasn't seen alive after being murdered, or he never died in the first place. Why do I have to explain the impossibility of these things? Zombies don't exist, man. People don't come back from the dead. Why does this need to be said? There is no "worldview" that accommodates the existence of zombies. People who believe in the risen dead are intellectually deficient or insane.
My guy woke up and thought that he could disprove some of the most deepest and oldest religions in 2 minutes by saying 'well jesus woke from the dead so...'😂
God is not to be mocked, we are like a raindrop compared to him, there is no way our smarts would compare to him, and your saying someone isn't smart just because they disagree with you, and yet the creator of this video is not smart, thats a joke.@@AURESHION
@@KristofirWhiteNo I said he isn't very smart because he used a logical fallacy. He's also just incorrect about a lot of things. but I questioned his smarts purely because he did something that was not very smart. Also your wording confused me at the end there. What joke are you referring to exactly?
That they said (in boast), "We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Messenger of Allah";- but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not:- ( Surah Nisa - 157 )
Well spoken, Brother! I'm reminded of Romans 10:9: "If you declare with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, then you will be saved."
@INFINITESYKOSIS Just saying someone is wrong without giving evidence or arguments of why you’re right and someone else is wrong makes me wonder why certain people believe what they believe.
@@lovespeaks777 My argument is that simply saying that because a man got revived from the dead dosen't mean he's god, infact by that logic the Anti-Christ would also be God.
"and for boasting, “We killed the Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, the messenger of Allah.” But they neither killed nor crucified him-it was only made to appear so. Even those who argue for this ˹crucifixion˺ are in doubt. They have no knowledge whatsoever-only making assumptions. They certainly did not kill him."
@dorimes.g1587 If you really understand what Jesus endured from the accounts we have, it’s a very illogical view to say He didn’t die on the cross for so many reasons. For one, many people didn’t even survive Roman scourging, which Jesus had to endure before carrying His cross, and then quickly after He was crucified. At the end of the crucifixion, they stabbed Him in the lungs and heart with a spear. Jesus was certainly dead. Let’s say hypothetically Jesus some how survived-which would be impossible-why would His disciples preach their Messiah and King rose from the dead when He was a body that was ripped apart and mangled? He would have looked like a horror movie victim. And then the record shows they preached Jesus was God and Messiah and died horrible deaths, not willing to deny He rose from the dead.
I don't know what that first thing is but Judaism doesn't consider how Jesus fit a lot of the criteria for the messiah and Islam came after Christianity so to believe in the Quran is to believe that god either made a mistake that big with the Bible or tricked his people on purpose.
I wonder what happened to the people who died before Jesus was born. Those people had no chance to accept Jesus as their Messiah since he wasn't born yet. So did God betray all those billions of people by not giving them the chance to accept Jesus? Or was there a way to heaven before he was born which means sending Jesus was unnecessary?
It’s a good question. The Bible talks about God judging people according to how they respond to the light they have. A couple ways He judges are how people respond to the creation and their conscience
😂😂😂😂 Christ quote old testament many Times...so your saying Jewish old testament is wrong. If you say Judaism is wrong then who's the father Jesus talking about😂😂😂😂😂..is it not the old testament father ?
When did I say that? Hell is a real place according to the scriptures, but I’m not sure what everyone’s judgment will be. But aren’t I trying to help people to stay away from such a place?
@@lovespeaks777that means Jesus has no mercy cause if you go to hell you stay for ever but if it was in Islam you will be saved unless you don’t reach the last gate
It’s not about doing good works to get to heaven. We couldn’t do enough good works to get there. It’s about being reconciled to God. The only way is through the sacrifice of Jesus. th-cam.com/video/mDz8sYTH5fg/w-d-xo.html This is a short video about the message of Christianity we made.
What are the chances out of thousands of deities that have been worshiped, yours is the right one? but of course YOU are the exception, oh wait that's what everyone else thinks.
@@lovespeaks777 have you studied all of the other religions? their denominations and personal encounters? or do you just assume yours has the best evidence because you were told from a young age to believe in Jesus?
@@Sam_Hyde_ApologistYea, when I see many religions don’t believe in God or they believe in many gods, I reject them because they aren’t compatible with the arguments for God’s existence. And many religions focus on glorifying man-not God, which makes it obvious they’re man-made.
I'm Muslim and I respect all of your beliefs. But I'm sorry if I missed something but this does not prove anything. It just proves that Christianity believes in Jesus (pbuh) as their god.
@solivi I believe Jesus proved He was God because of the miracles He did and His resurrection from the dead. My contention with the Koran is it says Jesus didn’t die on the cross. Not only is there great evidence from biblical and non-biblical sources about this, but why should I believe the Koran’s testimony when it was written 600 years after Christ?
@@lovespeaks777 Jesus never said in the bible directly that he is god. The Quran was authored by a prophet a man whose whole life was written. These words that he says have been revelated from Allah (swt) to him. The bible was written by a man (or men) whom you only know their first names. How can you trust a man whom you know nothing about?
@@lovespeaks777 yes Jesus did not die on the cross he is heaven waiting for the day of resurrection when he will see that people followed him as a god. Isa (as) is the messiah who will kill the fake messiah. And no matter how much you believe in Jesus you will believe the false messiah as your god. And I don't need you opinion on this because it's clear you will deny. I'm warning you just like how Allah warned me. Everything is left to you. Don't be led astray.
@@lovespeaks777 I'm not so sure as bible and christians are saying different thing but in Islam Isa (as) never got arrested but some one that looked like him did if you want a more detailed ver. ask me.
Okay gentle man, your sound feels good. But I have some questions which are bothering me a lot. Why you people changed your holly book? Why you made new testament according to your wish? Why you kneel before the son of god? Why you are not kneeling before god?
Ever thought that what you're saying is just "not true", and eye-witness accounts from 2000 years ago may be kind of inaccurate? You also didn't disprove deism, many other religions accept that Jesus was real, he's just not God, but that doesn't mean you DISPROVED the entirety of Hinduism, Jainism, Sikhism, Zoroastrianism, Baha'i, Confucianism, Shinto, Taoism or any other kind.
@@lovespeaks777 let me ask you this what evidence have you found that there is a God? none great before you say your bible its so easily faked in so many ways but have you ever seen that sky daddy you so believe in if heaven is filled with ppl who are this stupid id rather go to hell since atleast the ppl there might have an higher iq than what ever this vid is also do you believe in the flying whale who shat out this universe?
Odin has been seen countless times in the guise of a cloaked traveler. Thor is heard around the world almost every single day. Heimdall's rainbow bridge is also visible almost every day (somewhere around the world). Loki continues to cause mischief and mayhem, makes things go missing, starts arguments between friends, spouses, and more. Freyr continues to give good harvests around the world. Frigg continues to bless mothers and families. Freya still provides humans with fertility and love. Tyr continues to tempt leaders and soldiers to warfare. The fates continue to cut threads wherever anyone dies. But the thing you jump on as proof for your religion is that a few people a couple thousand years ago said someone wasn't in a tomb after a crucifixion.
If you really understand what Jesus endured from the accounts we have, it’s a very illogical view to say He didn’t die for so many reasons. For one, many people didn’t even survive Roman scourging, which Jesus had to endure before carrying His cross, and then quickly after He was crucified. At the end of the crucifixion, they stabbed Him in the lungs and heart with a spear. Jesus was certainly dead. Let’s say hypothetically Jesus some how survived-which would be impossible-why would His disciples preach their Messiah and King rose from the dead when He was a body that was ripped apart and mangled? He would have looked like a horror movie victim. And then the record shows they preached Jesus was God and Messiah and died horrible deaths, not willing to deny He rose from the dead. Jesus rose from the dead is the best explanation of His passion story.
No any historian can tell you that isnt even a possible option. Most go with the "mass hallucination" theory, that everyone hallucinated the exact same guy, saying the exact same things... and I guess all the while Jesus' followers somehow got past an army of roman guards and hid Jesus' body. I dont know about you but sounds a little ridiculous to me. But you might say so does a man coming back from the dead... so you know I guess choose your flavor of ridiculous. Lets hope you choose correctly.
I'm talking about the circular logic in your argument here. You claim Christianity is the true religion because of the resurrection story, which you attempt to prove by referencing the resurrection story.
@@Alex-lm7cx this is what he ment most likely 😅 the new testament is like someone's mail, or rather it is! The NT is like a newspaper that people saw back then. Thousands of NT's were made talking about the reserection. 500 and more people saw Jesus alive after they saw Him die, so they wrote it to show people He's alive and after they read it, they probably went out to see Him. So yes, Jesus is real, the NT is basicly a newspaper for the current thing back then they they saw
@@Alex-lm7cxhow can you prove resurrection didn’t happen? If the person is resurrected how can one even prove of his existence until the shroud of turin, if you know what I mean. Look, if there’s ever a perfect so called religion, why won’t everyone worship that single religion alone and not be divided followers of other religions right? There’s no true religion in the end it’s just good things by Jesus, as I don’t see personally Christianity to be a religion but following in his teachings as much as possible.
What if I where to write something down, that claims me to be god, and people start to believe it. Does that make it true because people believed it, or is it still wrong despite people beliving lies I wrote down. You cannot prove something like a God, and you also cannot disprove other religions with the argument of "I studied and there can only be 1 god"
There are many arguments for God’s existence, and they are strong arguments compared to their opposition. And the arguments for God’s existence give evidence for there being 1 God-not many gods.
@@lovespeaks777at least half of those are bs arguments. Humans developed morals through living in societies that required us to understand what is right and wrong to work together. Fine tuning assumes that "because things work, there is a god!" if things didn't work, then nobody would be here, however because of all the lucky things that happened, we are here. Assuming that there must be a higher power at play is pure speculation.
I am constantly surprised by the fact, that without saying anything of value, people actually can sound somewhat intelligent. There is so much wrong with this video, that can't and don't even want to comprehend it all. Just the fact that someone tries to explain all the complexity of all the FUNDAMENTAL things in the universe in just a minute is pure horror. It is terrifying to see, that so many believe in this nonesense.
bro you are talking to a wall right now. Where is your claim to prove that he is wrong. 2 problems eventually lead to a solution and you aren't even giving him a problem to work with lol.
@@Dephor0 What 2 problems are you talking about? I don't give him a problem, what?? And "Where is your claim to prove that he is wrong." My claim is up there up there. No seriously. I told you up there that the amount of work i would have to do to seriously debunk just 1 of his "arguments" is not worth a youtube comment, But go on, tell me one "argument" and i'll try to swiftly debunk it.
What I have come to believe is that if a person is on a journey seeking nothing but the TRUTH, all roads lead to God. I made a decision when I was 9 years old after encountering a nasty hypocrite whether I was going to spend my life living with pretty lies, or facing uncomfortable truths. I chose the latter. I am so glad that I did because I am so strong in my convictions because of it. I do not have any cognitive dissonance because I refuse to let ideas in if they are easily proved false. & because of that I dont hate people who are caught up in pretty lies, I think that they are just seeking temporary comfort because they chose the former path. It took me 30 years on this planet but I have come to know Jesus Christ as my Lord & savior. There is no way I can look upon all of the demonic evil doing of people in power (both left & right) & not believe that there is a god. There is spiritual warfare happening all around us, & we have been divided & nearly conquered as a country that was once founded on christian principles. They succeeded by removing God from our lives. That was one of the first things they did. The beauty of it all is, they can do whatever they want to my body, but they can never have my soul. That belongs to our Lord. I dont fear evil doers anymore because I have the light of god within me. & it is more real than anything else I have experienced in my life. I was blind but now I see, I was lost but now I am found. Thank you for this short video. Just my ramblings.
Praise the Lord and thanks for sharing your testimony! Once I tasted and saw that the Lord was good, I’ve wanted everyone else to enjoy Him as well! He is so so truly good. I agree, if people truly seek the Lord, they will find Him. I was apathetic about God and religion until my early 20’s. Someone shared the gospel with me and I became a Christian. The best choice I’ve ever made and the Lord has done amazing things in my life, even though it is still tough at times. Anyways, I was really encouraged by your testimony and God bless you! 🙏
@@lovespeaks777 This video didn't really prove anything that Christianity is true and other religions are false but of course I believe Christianity is the true religion but I feel like this video didn't prove why?
@@kofizayn6077 Do you know the arguments for God’s existence? If not, study them and you’ll end up with a monotheistic God. There are 4 religions that are monotheistic as I said in the video. They all make mutually exclusive claims, especially about Christ, so they can’t all be right. Therefore, you must conduct an investigation of whether or not any of them are true.
Can anyone answer why did Jesus came so late and if he was the only path to God then what about the humans before him who existed were there no way to heavens for them And please give the source and also feel free to provide some scientific evidence of its existence No offence tho and if you want to debate me or want to spread something please let me know your discord id
Imagine a reaction of three guys named galileo galilei, giordano bruno and nicolas copernicus when you say to them "christianity is the only true religion"
@@lovespeaks777 Over 30,000 changes were made in the b.i.b.l.e of which more than 5,000 represent differences between the Greek text used for the Revised Version and that used as the basis of the King James Version. Most of the other changes were made in the interest of consistency or modernization. Source: britannica Gabriel brought the word of God to Muhammad verbatim, and the Quran was divinely protected from any alteration or change. The Quran emphasizes that Muhammad was required only to receive the sacred text and that he had no authority to change it. Source: wikipedia The Quran, which was revealed fourteen centuries ago, mentioned facts only recently discovered or proven by scientists. These are just some of the many scientific facts found in the Quran. Source: research gate
وَلَوْ أَنَّنَا نَزَّلْنَا إِلَيْهِمُ الْمَلَائِكَةَ وَكَلَّمَهُمُ الْمَوْتَىٰ وَحَشَرْنَا عَلَيْهِمْ كُلَّ شَيْءٍ قُبُلًا مَّا كَانُوا لِيُؤْمِنُوا إِلَّا أَن يَشَاءَ اللَّـهُ وَلَـٰكِنَّ أَكْثَرَهُمْ يَجْهَلُونَ And even if We had sent down to them the angels [with the message] and the dead spoke to them [of it] and We gathered together every [created] thing in front of them, they would not believe unless Allah should will. But most of them, [of that], are ignorant. وَقَالَ فِرْعَوْنُ يَا أَيُّهَا الْمَلَأُ مَا عَلِمْتُ لَكُم مِّنْ إِلَـٰهٍ غَيْرِي فَأَوْقِدْ لِي يَا هَامَانُ عَلَى الطِّينِ فَاجْعَل لِّي صَرْحًا لَّعَلِّي أَطَّلِعُ إِلَىٰ إِلَـٰهِ مُوسَىٰ وَإِنِّي لَأَظُنُّهُ مِنَ الْكَاذِبِينَ And Pharaoh said, “O eminent ones, I have not known you to have a god other than me. Then ignite for me, O Haman, [a fire] upon the clay and make for me a tower that I may look at the God of Moses. And indeed, I do think he is among the liars.” إِنَّ الدِّينَ عِندَ اللَّـهِ الْإِسْلَامُ Indeed, the religion in the sight of Allah is Islam. إِنَّا أَنزَلْنَاهُ قُرْآنًا عَرَبِيًّا لَّعَلَّكُمْ تَعْقِلُونَ Indeed, We have sent it down as an Arabic Qur’an that you might understand. الْحَمْدُ لِلَّـهِ الَّذِي أَنزَلَ عَلَىٰ عَبْدِهِ الْكِتَابَ وَلَمْ يَجْعَل لَّهُ عِوَجًا ۜ [All] praise is [due] to Allah, who has sent down upon His Servant the Book and has not made therein any deviance. وَلَقَدْ يَسَّرْنَا الْقُرْآنَ لِلذِّكْرِ فَهَلْ مِن مُّدَّكِرٍ And We have certainly made the Qur’an easy for remembrance, so is there any who will remember? قُل لَّئِنِ اجْتَمَعَتِ الْإِنسُ وَالْجِنُّ عَلَىٰ أَن يَأْتُوا بِمِثْلِ هَـٰذَا الْقُرْآنِ لَا يَأْتُونَ بِمِثْلِهِ وَلَوْ كَانَ بَعْضُهُمْ لِبَعْضٍ ظَهِيرًا Say, “If mankind and the jinn gathered in order to produce the like of this Qur’an, they could not produce the like of it, even if they were to each other assistants.” أَفَلَا يَتَدَبَّرُونَ الْقُرْآنَ ۚ وَلَوْ كَانَ مِنْ عِندِ غَيْرِ اللَّـهِ لَوَجَدُوا فِيهِ اخْتِلَافًا كَثِيرًا Then do they not reflect upon the Qur’an? If it had been from [any] other than Allah, they would have found within it much contradiction. Quran [4:82] ذَٰلِكَ الْكِتَابُ لَا رَيْبَ ۛ فِيهِ ۛ هُدًى لِّلْمُتَّقِينَ This is the Book about which there is no doubt, a guidance for those conscious of Allah إِنَّا نَحْنُ نَزَّلْنَا الذِّكْرَ وَإِنَّا لَهُ لَحَافِظُونَ “Indeed, it is We who sent down the Qur’an and indeed, We will be its guardian.” أَمْ يَقُولُونَ افْتَرَاهُ ۖ قُلْ فَأْتُوا بِعَشْرِ سُوَرٍ مِّثْلِهِ مُفْتَرَيَاتٍ وَادْعُوا مَنِ اسْتَطَعْتُم مِّن دُونِ اللَّـهِ إِن كُنتُمْ صَادِقِينَ Or do they say, “He invented it”? Say, “Then bring ten surahs [chapters] like it that have been invented and call upon [for assistance] whomever you can besides Allah, if you should be truthful.” وَإِن كُنتُمْ فِي رَيْبٍ مِّمَّا نَزَّلْنَا عَلَىٰ عَبْدِنَا فَأْتُوا بِسُورَةٍ مِّن مِّثْلِهِ وَادْعُوا شُهَدَاءَكُم مِّن دُونِ اللَّـهِ إِن كُنتُمْ صَادِقِينَ And if you are in doubt about what We have sent down upon Our Servant [Muhammad], then produce a surah [chapter] the like thereof and call upon your witnesses other than Allah, if you should be truthful. (I have respect for Christianity) (islam and Christianity are brothers) I believe that god is Allah because Jesus was a prophet please don’t hate on islam😊 I have respect to Christianity I’m not trying to prove that Christianity is wronge I just gave my opinion 😊👍🏻
@@lovespeaks777 Imma take the lord's name in vain and say JESUS CHRIST MAN I'M NOT TRYNA DO A COMMENT SECTION BATTLE Ok but fr you're asking me that when you're saying that christianity is the superior religion and that every other one is wrong and false? Get a life, talk to people with differing opinions. Religion is a thing of the house.
@@Mantixion So if a religion says that we should murder people that don't believe what we do, we shouldn't say it is wrong? If someone were to tell you 2+2=5,000, you wouldn't have any issues with that? We stand for truth and there are a lot of false teachings out there. The truth about God and life is of utmost importance and there are important implications for whatever we believe.
@@lovespeaks777 Opinion is not fact. "2+2=4" is not "God is real". Murder is not a religion. A false teaching is the operation you're running here. Even some personal connections of mine who are christian would immediately invalidate this. Get past this and start contributing to the wellfare of people the system folks like you set in place screwed over.
@@lovespeaks777man not the same “2+2 is 4” analogy. Analysing what religion is true isn’t the same as asking what is 2+2. U were born and brought up a Christian im gonna assume, so u already have the assumption it is correct and then u use the facts that u have and place it in ways that satisfy it. Thats not rationally analysing, rather it is rationalising.
The likeliness that any religion is right is infinitely close to zero. The reason, people are responsible for maintaining religion. People have desires and ambitions, any possible truth that religion holds would have been abolished long ago, as these truths would interfere with the interests of those in power. Don't say that god maintains these truths or would protect a religion. If god interfered in any way with us, there wouldn't be children sold sexually by their parents for drugs.
People hold correct and incorrect views all the time, regardless if they’re in power or not. As for the Bible, you can look at all the evidence of how the actual texts have not changed over time
@@lovespeaks777 First, this isn't a matter of correct or incorrect views. During feudal society, those in power would never tolerate anything that challenged their rule or affected their interests. Second, there are recorded cases in history where religious leaders have met to change texts in the bible and religious documents. Not to mention, the meetings to determine inclusion and exclusion of content to the bible are admitted to have been carried out by the church. You want a good example, according to the traditional catholic bible, divorce was banned. When the Presbyterian church was founded, this text banning divorce was altered, permitting divorce, but only by men stating that women had no right to divorce. It was once again changed so that both men and woman can choose to divorce by excluding the text mentioning men and women. The second change occurred in the 1950s. This is only a recent example. Finally, noticed how you ignored the last line in my previous post. If god interfered in the world, drug addict parents wouldn't be able to send their children to the beds of drug dealers in exchange for drugs. Even today, this type of thing occurs, and isn't reported in the news to protect the child victims.
If the ancient people of the time gor proof of resurrection, we in the 21st century want it too. Ask him to come and show himself to us for just 4 days , and we will all believe.
Even if Jesus showed Himself in person to many, they wouldn’t believe. And they’d be more accountable. We have plenty of evidence for the existence of God and the resurrection.
@@lovespeaks777Answer me this: If the Hindu gods came down to you and proved to you CLEARLY that they are real and that Christianity is wrong with evidence, would you believe in them? If your answer is "no" I say: Why? Aren't you interested in what's true? If your answer is "yes" I say: Didn't you just say many wouldn't believe even if Jesus came down to us? So why do you say YOU would believe? A bit hypocritical, no?
fine tuning is not a good argument. It assumes what it is trying to conclude. How can we know that the physical constants are on this so called "razor edge" and that someone finely tuned it. It is an assumption made for the argument to make sense.
@@lovespeaks777 i dont claim that they happended by chance. I am just pointing out that we dont know anything about how these came to be, so its dumb to make any claim whatsoever about likehood or such.
@@karlbjerke133 When we see a building we know it had a builder. How with this infinitely more complex universe do we reason it had no creator or designer? What makes that view more reasonable?
@@lovespeaks777 Thats just a statement for your own ignorance which you won’t admit. You dont know how the universe works so you assume it works how you want it to. And if you want to argue cause and effect you are going to have to do better than to say the universe needed a cause, which is god, but god doesn’t need a cause. If you want to draw the line arbitrary you have to reason for it.
What are the fundamental requirements to be the Messiah. A decentent from king David thru Solomon and be Jewish. How is one Jewish? It based on the mother. How does one have a tribal connection? Through the physical biological father. Who was his biological father? According to Luke and Mathew a spirt. Like Hercules son of Jupiter. So he isn't the Messiah.
Amen! God bless you. Thank you for this video. Do you have an email for Christian can reach out to you? I would like to ask for your feedback on a short booklet I wrote about the Christian faith.
Alhamdulillah... Allah will serve justice... may Allah opens the innocence of humanity's knowledge into Allah. Indeed if these people will be blessed by Allah they will not going to do this cruelty to thier fellowman. But thier lack and innocence of knowledge to Allah lead them this way... May Allah guide the Zionist people into Allah's path... For indeed Palestine sacrifices thier lives inorder for these innocent people to be saved in this Dunya. Ameen yah Allah....🤗
@@lovespeaks777 Yes, Allah is more forgiving to you than you are to yourself and he knows your intentions. Every single chapter (except one) starts with "In the name of Allah (God), the most merciful, the most kind"
@@lovespeaks777 read the comment, there is no evidence/successful arguments for it you need to provide evidence he does exist anyway, as you are the proposing side here
@daffydpowell Have you studied the arguments for God’s existence? Like the cosmological, moral, teleological, fine-tuning, ontological arguments? I started with those because they are very strong arguments to prove the existence of God. If you then conclude God exists, you can look to see if any religions are compatible with what those arguments portray. We believe Jesus proved that He was God because of His resurrection from the dead, which is why Christianity would be true.
"If you study the arguments for god's existence, you'll end up with a monotheistic god..." WHY? Over 3000K gods you choose NOT to believe in...why not just one more?
1. God is defined as a perfect being. 2. To be perfect is to lack nothing. 3. No two beings are identical. 4. This means that one must lack something the other possesses. 5. The one that lacked something would not be perfect, and therefore, not be God. 6. Therefore, one can only be God.
![[TH] VCT Masters Shanghai Swiss Stage DAY 5 // FPX vs TH | FUT vs LEV](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/r61uDZTmu44/mqdefault.jpg)
Spoken like a modern Christian......doesnt understand any other belief, let alone his own
And that’s why I explained 3 other opposing views.
@@lovespeaks777 in your 1.5 minute video? "it's not meant to be comprehensive, it's meant to be concise." then don't try to disprove every major religion. make a video that actually has effort put into it, rather than just denying other people's beliefs.
can i ask what is your faith@@gregsmith8977
Only one can be true.
@@nicholascarver1 or they could all be wrong. we don't know. let other's practice what they want, and you practice what you want. hate is not a required component of your religion
Title: This video contains PROOF that Christianity is true!
Video: Find the proof youreself. You'll agree, promise.
Have you studied the arguments for God’s existence?
@@lovespeaks777 I have, and I do in fact believe in God. I think that your argument in this video was incredibly poor. Saying that you’re providing proof and then telling your viewers to find the evidence themselves is a terrible way to argue anything, not to mention that the thing you’re arguing is as monumental as the existence of God.
In all honestly, I would rather watch an hour long video where you lay out all of the philosophical and historical evidence than a minute long video where you tell your viewers to figure it out themselves.
@@gothamwarriorI think informative videos are good, but this wasn’t meant to be comprehensive considering it’s a minute long. It has helped us to engage with many and dialogue about religions and God, so that’s a win. We have other videos that go over arguments for God’s existence and theology and are way more in depth than this one
@@lovespeaks777The one minute limit is a self imposed handicap that makes the job impossible while giving you a convenient excuse why it wasn't very good.
Let me convince you christianity is false with just one letter: A.
Doesn't really work, does it?
@@chlorophyllphileI don’t have to prove that God exists-He has already shown Himself to the creation. People are free to deny Him, but we’re trying to have good conversations because of the importance of this topic.
"Christianity is the truth 'cause a christian source, the bible, said it's truth"
Petitio principii in a nutshell
@timidtlk I started with the arguments for God’s existence. Any rebuttals to those arguments?
@@lovespeaks777 What arguments? Ontological? Moral?
Most of these arguments are just some kind of idealism. The ontological argument is an example, because the existence of a 'perfect' idea does not mean the existence of a 'perfect' thing in the material world. An idea NEVER creates a substance, it is the substance that, in itself, creates the idea.
Furthermore, the “existence of God” is not my point. My criticism goes to the idea that you can prove that Christianity is the truth, when in fact you can't without necessarily using Christian sources, and, as I said, trying to prove that in your video, you use the "petitio principii" fallacy, where the aim is to demonstrate the truth in the conclusion of the argument, assuming that this same conclusion is true and employing this assumption in one of the premises.
@@timidtlkMany non-Christian sources say Jesus died under the hands of the Romans, was buried in a private tomb, the tomb was empty, and Jesus’ followers believed they had seen Him risen after 3 days. Doesn’t mean you have to believe this, but the best explanation for the empty tomb and Jesus’ post mortem appearances is that He did raise from the dead.
Also, to say we can’t prove anything about God or Jesus by using the Bible doesn’t make any sense. If we have written sources about an event that are close to the time period of its occurrence, why wouldn’t we consider them?
@@lovespeaks777 Dude, if it even happened. it would have been around 2000 years ago. there is no way in hell you can prove the legitimacy of those claims. especially since they are all eyewitness claims.
but you also need to tell the truth with the non-biblic sources: the other religions themselves. artifacts from the world itself, or maybe parts of the Tanakh, such as the Torah. or maybe other sources of information that could INDIRECTLY tell the presence of a god. you can prove SOMETHING about god using the bible, but other sources are important, too.
I'm Christian myself, but I don't feel like this video is gonna convince non-Christians.
Edit: Can you all stop trying to convince me to be atheist? LIke cool, if you want to be atheist, you can be, but let people believe in their religions.
That’s what the comments section is for. God bless 🙏
@@I_Love_My_Little_Willyman yours is huge
you can only help those who want to be helped
Same here.
As an ex-Christian, I can confirm that it had wayyy too many assumptions to convince anyone except practicing Christians.
You don't need a magical suicide trick to make a semitic deity no longer want to torture you when you die.
Suicide, in that, after yahweh's entrapment in Eden, every human apparently deserved to burn in hell forever (original sin). He sends himself in human form, somehow becoming his own son from his own holy seed, and he's now on earth with a specific mission to get himself killed. That's a form of suicide-by-cop, and he did this to trick himself into no longer wanting to torture us in the afterlife. But this Willy Wonka golden ticket is only redeemable if you believe in the magic trick and let him enter your heart.
You literally just stated your beliefs without evidence for any of them lol
Have you studied the arguments for God’s existence?
@@lovespeaks777 studying from no evidence book?
@@lovespeaks777 have yo? your evidence is primarily the bible, which has not been proven to be a valid source. eyewitness accounts from anonymous sources? could have been made up.
That is just foolish. I can tell you, atheist. You're not even secular to begin with, because even secular scholars approve biblical facts. Search up the 'Dead Sea Scrolls' which were discovered before the year 2000, documenting things that were way before Jesus, and way before the Israel nation, that you will read in later Old Testament books before Jesus. They matched up with the previous texts. Secular documents and accounts confirm things that the Bible has said about a historic group of people, places and events. Such as the Pirate, Babylon, the ruined temple, claims of a Messiah and his disciples. Never forget the wide spread of Christianity.It's literally been proven, and it continually is. It's not even a book that fell from Heaven. It's real things that did happen and are continually being confirmed. it seems to be, that you don't want the Bible to be true. As an excuse to live your own life, and find a reason not to believe in God. This my friend, is storing up wrath for yourself on Judgement Day. It's pure ignorance and not even an open mind. There's evidence for the Christian Bible, and I know this now, as I haven't been a Christian all my life.@@zxc-e1112
@@lovespeaks777 from the book some guy made up? Nah, I’ll go with concrete evidence for evolution lol
Change the title to: I'm too lazy to fully explain my case and learn about other religions so instead I will make baseless statements with little context for one minute.
I've never seen someone so insecure about their religion before.
Change your comment to, “I don’t have a rebuttal to the content in your video, so I will just say you’re wrong and I’m right!”
@@lovespeaks777 Go on, do a full form video explaining your case and I will make a proper rebuttal if I believe your points are flawed, unless of course, you are afraid of a little research. You are probably just a rage baiter which is why you couldn't be bothered to put effort in, just like your religion, you don't need to put any effort in. "Oh I'm so sorry lord please forgive me for raping a Muslim girl!"
"Oh you're all right mate come on up here to heaven! She wasn't Christian anyway why would I care?"
Rebutting your video is very easy, because you don't disprove other religions wrong. You just say other religions are wrong because my religion says so. We could use the same argument to prove Hinduism as being the true religion. This is how stupid you argument is. @@lovespeaks777
No your video is weak, accept it instead of letting your ego take over just like it did to satan. Your whole video can be summarized like this : other religions dont agree with the bible therefore they are wrong. Hindus could say the same thing about the bible not agreeing with their book, doesn't make hinduism true. @@lovespeaks777
@@lovespeaks777 dude, there's not much to rebute here
Christianity logic :
God sacrifice His son which is Himself to Himself to save us from Himself because of a rule He made Himself?
That is a misunderstanding of the Trinity.
1. There is one God.
2. There are 3 distinct persons who are God: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.
3. The Father is not the Son or the Holy Spirit; The Son is not the Father or the Holy Spirit; The Holy Spirit is not the Father or the Son.
4. God is three persons in one essence, not three essences in one essence.
@@lovespeaks777 if you asked 3 Christians to explain the trinity you will get 4 different answers every time you repeat the question.
And this the most important thing in the religion the concept of God
😂😂….good point.
…and he asked himself: “why you forsaken me?”
Did I not explain it well?
@@lovespeaks777 you re just repeating what the nician creed says. How there are one and each one is fully God . Why the is father is the only one who is all knowing and many many many explicit passages in the Bible indicate that the father is the only God.
Try again
You cant just say "lots of people saw him", you need to actually provide evidence that they did.
@battekyake6107 We have many written sources saying this. How else could we know besides it being written?
@@lovespeaks777 Ok, but you didnt provide any of them.
@@battekyake6107The N.T.
@@lovespeaks777 They were anonymous, how do you know that theyre eye witnesses? 💀
@@battekyake6107You have to investigate the text. Several considerations are, did the writers speak about the geography, laws, culture, leaders, etc correctly? Did they tell the story as fiction or non-fiction? I don’t mind being skeptical of the Bible, but I have no reason to believe it isn’t true. The creed in 1 Corinthians 15 about Jesus dying, being buried and being raised the third day was as early as 5 years after it happened and the gospels record this happening.
Can’t just say all other religions are wrong bud
@thatdefaulty Did you watch the whole video? All religions contradict one another so they can’t all be right at the same time. Do you have some arguments for your beliefs?
@@lovespeaks777oh really? It can also be a possibility that Hinduism, Islam and Judaism is true and christianity is false? If they are really contradicting each other, how are you so sure that only christianity exist?
@@Imprisoner3493 Because Teaching of Christ are Totally Different with that All Religion Patheic
@@Gilbert.Suhendra that's what I am saying, according to this video he is saying that all other religion are wrong and christianity is true, see the thumbnail.
I am just saying that it can also be a possibility that other religion are true and christianity can be false.
@@Gilbert.Suhendra and i don't believe in flat earth too
Good grief! How pathetic.
Why so?
It is not only foolish, but extremely arrogant and disrespectful.
@@lovespeaks777 LOL. Just by looking at your face my friend. Why in your other video did it took you 2 minutes to prove Christianity was true?
Because Teaching of Christ are Totally Different with that All Religion are Hypocrite and Pathetic
Because Teaching of Christ are Totally Different with that All Religion are Hypocrite and Pathetic
There are so many flaws in this argument
1) Only 4 monotheistic religions: Sikhism, Zoroastrianism, Many sects of Hinduism are monotheistic as well as many other religions, narrowing it down to 4 is actually crazy
2) Different views on Jesus: This is probably my biggest problem with the argument: You havent said why it has to be Jesus for the religion's moral/truthful merit. Christians can be happy and praise Jesus to the core but so can Muslims with Muhammad, Sikhs with Guru Nanakh, Hindus with Krishnaji, Zoroastrians with Zoroaster. They all have central figures of their own religions.
3) Just because a lot of people testify to something doesn't make it automatically true, because a man rising from the dead is the most paranormal thing known to mankind, if it was real. Eyewitness accounts aren't a shred of evidence for such a bold claim made over 2000 years ago.
Also Christianity, Islam, Judaism, all reject evolution which has much more evidence supporting it than some sky-figure controlling heavens and earth from above. Christian priests and Muslim apologists so radically oppose this theory when its clear they know nothing about it.
Lastly, don't tell people to "read the Bible for themselves" when you haven't read a Qur'an, Granth Sahib, Gita, Sutra, or a textbook in depth yourself while making such bold claims on other's religions. The lack of knowledge you had about these religions and vague superficial understanding of them, which is why people are thrashing on you in the comments. Clearly only christians themselves here are affirming your argument. You have every right to praise your own religion but don't be commenting on other religions as if you have some platform to stand on with some dude being nailed to a stick.
EDIT: pls stop replying ☠
@vmb4420 You said a lot, but one thing to point out is that there are Christians that believe in evolution.
@@lovespeaks777 Im aware. My main point besides your inaccuracies is that you have every right to praise your own religion, but looking down on OTHER religions when you know legit know NOTHING about them is my problem here.
@@butterfingers60 You’re making a lot of assumptions here. It’s a good thing to judge whether things are right or wrong, like other religions. The first thing I saw when I opened a Koran was kill those who wage war against Allah and his messenger. I judged that right away, and I judged it to be wrong. When religions say things like inflict harm on other people or only care about yourself, I would say they are wrong. And you assumed I didn’t know anything about other religions, yet I showed the difference between 4 in the video.
@@lovespeaks777 Well, the key differences you highlighted were their views on Jesus, so as a Christian it would make sense for you to understand their stances, but that doesn't prove whether they're right or wrong. And can you send me a single verse from the Torah saying Christians are infidels? Jews came before Christians so thats not possible. Someone could judge Christianity for sending non-Christians to hell, in many views that doesnt seem very fair.
@@butterfingers60What’s not fair about God punishing people for their sins? Should Hitler not be punished?
Before watching this, I was a muslim. Now I'm still a muslim ❤
Do you trust what the Koran says about Jesus’ death, burial, and resurrection when it was written 600 years after the events? If so, why would you dismiss what the N.T. says when it was written within the generation of the eyewitnesses?
😂
@@lovespeaks777 The Quran was not "written" 600 years after the events, it is a revelation from god so it does not matter at what place or time was the Quran revealed because once you establish the belief that it is the word of god ( which is what muslims believe) it does not matter at what place or time was the Quran revealed.
Furthermore, the N.T is a writing of man, wether you're a muslim or christian you should still accept the fact that the N.T is the word of man, Mark, Luke, John and Matthew in specific. You have even used it as a source/evidence against islam despite muslims not believing it is the word of god. Now that we established this, muslims could make the decision to convert to christianity, which can possibly mean eternal life in heaven but also eternal life in hell.
Muslims or any religious group shouldn't logically make a decision that can lead them to eternal punishment in hell based on a man made book (The New Testament) as it is prone to error and corruption which have been proven countless times by textual critics. It is also known that the new testament was not really a historical book but rather a theological book so the writers would have no problem adding false historical events as long as it is consistent with their theological beliefs which has also been confirmed by bible scholars if you do your research.
The argument that we should accept it as it was written in the generation of the eyewitnesses is like saying we can accept any source in the 1940s about the world war since it was written in its time period, pretty inconsistent isn't it?
He didn’t say anything for you to convert 🤡 . He only said what he believed, unlike a terrorist will always stay a true terrorist so what to even expect from a terrorist 😘
He didn’t say anything for you to convert 🤡 . He only said what he believed, unlike a ter::ist will always stay a true ter::ist so what to even expect from a ter::ist 😘
You kinda ran straight past arguing any other position and simply claim the only position available is monotheism. That simply isn't the case
I’ll admit, I did present information quickly. When studying the arguments for God’s existence, you end up with a monotheistic God. I think the arguments are very good and are the best explanation for the creation, design, and sustaining of the universe, and for objective moral truths. The counter arguments to these I find to be illogical and not scientific.
@@lovespeaks777 it may be an unfamiliarity with certain ideas and philosophies, but someone from an eastern background may argue that in fact a non dualist position is the most logical and consistent with observable reality.
Why do you think you have to study God's existence? God is not comprehensible by the rational mind. That might be the fatal flaw. God is not a singular entity nor is it many entities. It is human hybris that strives to rationalize God. By arguing the way you do, you are disconnecting yourself from oneness.
We reason from effect to cause. Because we don’t see God, we investigate the effects of His work.
For example: Because we have a universe, we can conclude two things about it: either nothing created it or something did. Can nothing create something? No, so we rule out nothing could have created the universe.
The other option is something created the universe. What attributes would you have to have to be able to create the universe? You’d have to be extremely powerful, (able to create matter and energy) intelligent, (ingeniously ordering everything that works and sustains in this universe) space less, (you cannot occupy the space of something you’re creating or you’d be in the way, also you cannot exist inside of something that doesn’t exist yet) timeless, (if you caused the origin of time, there wouldn’t be time before you created it) eternal, (if you are timeless, then you wouldn’t have a beginning, which would make you eternal) and personal, only minds makes decisions (decision to create and design, and a mind can only make a mind). Who fits those attributes? God.
You're trying to put human attributes onto God, which shows me the narrowness of christian thinking. You are conflating our desire to explain stuff with actual spiritual knowledge which always has been and will be timeless. It also shows your very recent human perception of time as linear, requiring it to have a beginning. The universe, God, has always existed in and as everything. There was no creation in the sense of genesis. When you start understanding the universe, how it's laws work, you will find out how limiting and therefore even blasphemous your perception of God is. The universe is constant renewal or in our interpretation creation. Just trying to rationalize God is like trying to make the fish in the tank understand that the moon is a big rock 300000 km away from earth.
Religions have been control Instruments keeping us far from God. Now to single out one of them and saying this is truth and everything else is wrong is both arrogant and foolish. And of course trying to put human attributes onto God shows how limited your spiritual experience is.
*When you wake up from slumber and decide to wobble anything that comes to your mind...*
Yea, cuz this info isn’t well attested or known at all.
@@lovespeaks777 you mean that the info you are providing is the ultimate truth ?
this video does absolutely nothing to prove Christianity let alone every other religion wrong
Do you believe all religions can be true at the same time although they contradict one another?
@@lovespeaks777no, only islam.
@@deviou3s_sDoesn’t Allah not love sinners? I thought God by nature has to be all-good?
@@lovespeaks777 He is the most mercifull.
@@lovespeaks777 Allah does not want you to sin, if you repent he will forgive you. Matter fact, Allah spantala loves everyone.
I watched this a a muslim and now, im still muslim
I’m still a Christian
LOL. So much for him convincing any one that chrispianity is true.
as a muslim this dosent convince me
how did humans even have the power to KILL a god?
early christians belived he didnt die on the cross
He died because He was fully man and fully God. Early Christian’s did believe He died on the cross. Research the creed in 1 Corinthians 15. It’s dated very early and talks about Jesus dying on the cross. Also, why should we trust the Koran about Jesus’ life and crucifixion, which was written 600 years after the events?
why we should trust your sky friends book which was written by unknown person?@@lovespeaks777
@@lovespeaks777 so according to your logic, a man can be god and human at the same time, but god cant die because he is immortal, but this person is half man half god and he died, god sacrificed god to save people from god's punishement, god asked god for help but god refused to help god, then god resurrected jesus which is god which means god resurrected himself, bible says god is immortal but it also says that god was crucified, so many contradictions that would crucify your braincells
@@UntitledChannel1602Jesus is fully man and fully God
@@lovespeaks777no where in the Bible says that but it says Jesus was a man appointed by God Jesus never claimed to God y'all and deceived by Satan because only Satan is the author of confusion hence the Bible is full of confusion and errors and is definitely the works of Satan 👿
Bro your bible has changed a lot
@tremcin It actually hasn’t. Many like to say this, but it’s not true.
Even Bart Ehrman, a textual critic and agnostic that debates Christians on various topics, said this:
“Bruce Metzger is one of the great scholars of modern times, and I dedicated the book to him because he was both my inspiration for going into textual criticism and the person who trained me in the field. I have nothing but respect and admiration for him. And even though we may disagree on important religious questions - he is a firmly committed Christian and I am not - we are in complete agreement on a number of very important historical and textual questions. If he and I were put in a room and asked to hammer out a consensus statement on what we think the original text of the New Testament probably looked like, there would be very few points of disagreement - maybe one or two dozen places out of many thousands. The position I argue for in ‘Misquoting Jesus’ does not actually stand at odds with Prof. Metzger’s position that the essential Christian beliefs are not affected by textual variants in the manuscript tradition of the New Testament.”
@@lovespeaks777 "That's not true, because despite all the evidence that it is, and the thousands of people who tell me it is, I found one source for a questionably intelligent/informed/honest guy who said nuh-uh" Is a very fitting argument from you
@@Random_LurkerI chose to cite a skeptic that debates Christians and tries to change religious people’s minds because he does read the actual text of the Bible. Of course we have many religious or Christian textual critics as well that can tell you that the text hasn’t changed. You can read everything we have and see how much it varies. The evidence is there, but many ignore it because they don’t want it to be true
The Old Testament is in Hebrew And Aramaic And The New Testament is in Greek Do You Want We Read Somenthing That We Do'nt Know?
@@JesusIsTheWord11If you want to reject the Bible and it’s teachings, you are free to do that. But to say the variants have changed the message into something we can’t be sure of is just not true. I can agree to disagree
how do you know jesus resurrected ?
we know that jesus resurrected because it says in the bible
how do you know that the bible is true ?
the bible is true because jesus resurrected in it
how do you know jesus resurrected ?
we know that jesus resurrected because it says in the bible
how do you know that the bible is true ?
the bible is true because jesus resurrected in it
Basic argument structure of theist
I didn’t like this video for that same reason, but you can find much more detail elsewhere.
Thanks for the comments. What do you all think is the best evidence against Christianity?
@@lovespeaks777 I would say for me it's the existence of other religions, the disagreement of bible authors and darwinism
How do I know Jesus was never put in a tomb?
When Rome crucified you, you were left to rot, fall to pieces, and be eaten by scavengers. That was part of the punishment. To be denied a proper burial.
How do I know Rome did that?
HISTORY CLASS!
Your turn.
Btw A real theologian will know these:
Christianity & Judaism
"The first of all the commandments is, 'Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God, the Lord is One! "(Mark 12:28-29 :
Deuteronomy 6:1).*
*Islam
Say: He is Allah, The One and Only.
(Al-Qur'an 112:1)*
*Hinduism
He is One without a second.
(Chandogy Upanishad 6:2:1)*
*Sikhism
There is but One God whose name is true,,
who is called The True, The Creator.
(Sri Guru Granth Sahib, vol: 1 , Japuji verse; 1)*
*Zoroastrians (Parsis)
He is One. He is without an Origin or end.
He has no father or mother, wife or son.
(Dasatir, Ahura Mazda)*
He never going to reply this let alone actually reading all versions of Bible especially those in original semantics language.
I read the Quran,the Torah, the Psalms, the Gospel,the I-Ching ,the Tipitaka,The Vedas from cover to cover and
After reading everything, I realized that there is no difference .ONE GOD☝️It's not a competition, it's the understanding of Divine Truth.
0:08 Deism isn't a religion... But Zoroastrianism is! Also, what ruled out Bahaism or New Age, or plain old monotheistic spirituality in general, just out of curiosity?
Further, the "eyewitness testimonies" you are claiming here are probably mostly from Paul, and if someone from 2,000 years ago says that they touched Jesus (or anyone else, for that matter) after he had died and he was alive, take it with a HUGE grain of salt.
Actually, if someone (such as Paul) says that SOMEONE ELSE said that they saw Jesus walking around after he died? Take it with at least two gigantic grains of salt!
I'm not able to know if you agree or disagree the video lol
But Paul was not the only eyewitness. We have writings by Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, in the gospels and Acts (written by Luke), and also writings by Peter and James, in their epistles (not counting the author of Hebrews, who we don't know).
Moreover, these books mention many people who saw the resurrected Jesus. In the gospels, in Acts, in epistles. To women, to the apostles, to a crowd. 500 people in total (1 Corinthians 15:6).
All these people and others died because they said "Jesus lives", and can't be possible that they all chose die to profess a lie. The only one who survived was John, who was kept until his death in exile, where he wrote the Revelation.
So we can affirm: Christ lives!
@@calebewilliams5202 you stated a whole lot of non sequiturs and things that you couldn't possibly know there. For starters, the assumed author of Revelation is John of Patmos who is NOT the same apostle John who supposedly wrote the Gospel of John. Further, *none* of the 4 gospels were likely written by the people who have their names attributed to them. The fact that their titles imply that they did, like most or all of the other things you said, is an unsubstantiated claim, and in no way, shape, or form evidence or proof that those were the actual authors.
And the claim of 500 witnesses is also just a completely unsubstantiated claim, not that it would particularly, necessarily matter anyway. Baha'is will say that there were *thousands* of witnesses to the supposed supernatural events that surrounded one of their prophet's deaths - the Bab's. And I think there were thousands of witnesses. Would you believe *them* if I told you that story? Because it most likely happened. In my understanding there are newspaper articles from the 19th century about it, but nothing about it was likely to have been supernatural.
And people can and do lay down their lives, knowingly even, for something that is a lie. The Coronavirus deniers who were in critical condition in hospitals saying - on their deathbeds - that it's a "fake virus" took their denial with them to their graves.
@@wormwood822 Sorry, you're last statement😂I just can't. Obviously it was an actual sickness, because people got sick, but there was an immense amount of deception from the government, social media, news, hospitals, and renown medical organizations saying that masks "help", the vaccine is "safe and effective", social distance and stay home because you know, covid won't wander father than 6ft from you🙄 Yet all of this was complete bonkers and totally contradicted common sense and hundreds of major studies debunking these lies. Not only that, but the amount of nurses and doctors diagnosing covid to people who, in reality, were not sick at all, or had a completely different sickness is a very large number. They would even say the cause of death was covid... for people who got in car accidents. This is literally true. My dad, in fact, was a big whistle blower and reporter during those years. He produced his own documentary called "Following the Science?" that got around 2M views. Billions of people were probably brainwashed and fooled by sites like CNN. Believe me, we've done our research, I hope you don't believe in the deceit that was so blatantly enforced.
what is deism then? it is definitly a religion
@@furkanunsal5814 deism isn't a religion, similar to how theism and atheism aren't religions. Deism is the belief in a God that doesn't intervene or act in any way that we can detect. Many of the Founding Fathers of the United States were deists.
Christianity is the greatest example of " Trust me bro , im not lying " 😂😂
How so?
LOL. They say that and have their fingers crossed behind their back!
I can appreciate that condensing an argument into one minute means skipping over a lot of steps, though I would say Hindusim isn't technically polytheistic. Generally it's understood as a polymorphic monotheism, in that the Devas (gods in the lowercase 'g' sense) are created beings within the universe, whereas the Godhead Brahman (which is also Atman, the one Self of all things) is the ultimate principle of reality, and so God in the proper sense. This is a somewhat similar distinction to the Greek word theos, which is a lowercase god, vs the proper term Ho theos (or O theos as there appears to be no h in Greek), which is God in the fullest sense.
I wouldn't be too quick to dismiss the Buddhist Brahma or the Tao either, as they bear some similarities to Christian apophatic ideas of God. I've heard that one Chinese Bible even uses the word Tao as a substitute for Logos (the Word in the prologue of John), as it carries many of the deep connotations.
@Skin_Man Thanks for the comment. If Jesus is God, He said some things that would make other religions false. He said no one comes to the Father except by Him. If Jesus wasn’t God, that statement wouldn’t be a problem, but if He proved His divinity by His resurrection from the dead, then what He says is truth
@@lovespeaks777 You're definitely right that not all religions can be 100% true (at least taking them at their most literal level), but it is interesting to find deep synchronicity between their most fundamental tenants. I'm pretty sure many of the early Church fathers maintained that God had given partial revelation to all people (and I think Paul hints at this too), because God continually draws all to himself. Humans, wherever we are, are continually reaching toward the transcendent. Religio (Latin, not a typo), was considered a virtue that all people possessed.
In my understanding, all come to God through Christ because Christ ultimately is the bridge between humanity and divinity. Christ took upon the sin and estrangement of the world, overpowering it and making it possible for man to enter into the divine life. In the words of St. Athanasius, God became man so that man might become God. While other faiths have deep truths to them, Christianity holds the fullness of that truth (even if we are only encountering it in a veiled form, suitable to our weakness, and not yet face-to-face).
@@Skin_ManYea, there is definitely some moral truth in probably most or all religions. That seems to be where there is overlap. But Jesus definitely proved His divinity with what He said and did. Jesus is king!
@@lovespeaks777"If Jesus is God..." That is begging the question. If jesus is god, of course christianity is true. The question is whether that was the case, and there is no solid evidence for it.
@@lovespeaks777 Now you understand why Christian civilizations had to be maintain through fear and terror of the church. Forced lies and oppression of the truth. Once such thing could no longer be deployed successfully the Christian numbers started to decline and you have Politian's who attempt the same thing to remain in power or attempt to create forced ideologies. Races can never be recreated after being destroyed unlike religions that can be switched out and back in like brands of underwear.
In the Gospel According to St. Matthew chapter 19 verse 17 Jesus says "why do you call me good, there is none good but God". This clearly shows that Jesus considered himself different from and much less than God. I would very much to hear the author of this posting explain how he knows more about God than Jesus.
@rogeraffleck8677 I disagree. Jesus knew the person didn’t think He was deity because He called Him a “good teacher.” Jesus was correcting Him by asking “why would call someone you think is merely human good?”
Read what Jesus’ response to the Sanhedrin was when He was arrested and then read the passages He quotes in the O.T. in response, and tell me Jesus didn’t think He was deity
I agree with this. I have heard about when Jesus was on the cross, a guard was shoving something on Jesus's face and God wanted to kill him; but Jesus stopped God from doing the action and spared the mans life. I have no idea how people think Jesus and God are the same.
@@Funtime_Fzexcalty 💯 and remember Jesus was crying in the cross God to save him from humiliation based on the prayer he made in the garden and acts 2:32 literally said God saved Jesus and holy spirit lifted him to heaven and Jesus received the promise God made in the old testament that Jesus will saved 😂
Hey man, this video is kind of just, "Christianity is right, because the bible and written accounts." The same logic could apply to SO many religions... we all have our own beliefs, and reasons for those beliefs. Don't discredit other religions for the same reasons you use to credit your own, I don't really have any stance on whether God is real or not, but this argument definitely hasn't swayed me one way or the other. Edit: Saw you say, "Christianity says Jesus died on the cross, and Islam says He never did. Can both of the statements be true at the same time?" So I ask you, why are you assuming that YOUR argument is the truth here? It seems to me like you are being close-minded and assuming YOUR truth to be THE truth, without TRULY considering the possibilities.
Yea, this is why you have to do your research. Islam says Jesus didn’t die on the cross and this was written in the Koran 600 years after the event. The N.T. says Jesus did die on the cross and it was written within the generation of the eye witnesses. What would be a more reliable source?
@@lovespeaks777 neither. When something has happened so long ago, we just can’t be sure. When we go to explain the past and the birth of the universe, somewhere down the line we have to assume something, whether that’s that god always existed, or that literally anything else always existed. Now that I think about it, the very first thing you do in this video is assume that there is only one god because of sources you don’t even list. I don’t think it’s impossible for god to exist, just improbable. In fact, I think every belief and religion is unlikely to be true, because we just don’t have advanced enough technology to just, “check”. Again, I have my reasons for my beliefs, and everyone else does too. My critique of this video isn’t because of you defending your beliefs, it’s putting down other beliefs without equal consideration.
@@sillybillyrealnotfakeCan we be sure that Washington was president? That Alexander The Great really existed? Did Mark Twain really write his books?
Either there is a God or not. If there is one, then not every religion can be right about Him because they all contradict one another. And 2+2=4 has one right answer and millions of wrong ones. That’s why 1 religion can be true and the rest false
@@lovespeaks777 what’s makes you assume that your answer to 2+2 is correct
@@sillybillyrealnotfakeBecause we can test it and have. Mathematics is true because it follows logic, reason, and evidence.
LOL. Only an arrogant religious fanatic would even try to disprove (or prove) one religious denomination is superior to another! For your ignorance I applaud you sir!
lol
Can 2+2=4 and 5 at the same time? Because all religions contradict each other, they can’t all be right at the same time.
@@lovespeaks777 I agree in that they are ALL wrong. Good luck.
Fair enough. What evidence have you found that there is no God?
@@lovespeaks777 LOL. Next time you run into God please get His autograph for me. Good luck.
So your "proof" is that some random book says, that some random dude died on the cross but somehow he survived that and was alive again?
@jschneider8873 No, I started with the arguments for God's existence, which are very strong and prove God exists. Then, from there you can investigate to see if any religions are reliable and cohesive with that data.
@@lovespeaks777 strong arguments for gods existence? i would like to hear them
@@jschneider8773Sure, let’s start with my favorite.
Because there is objective evil, there has to be objective good. Since humans aren’t objectively good, the source of this goodness would transcend humans. It would also transcend the universe because the universe isn’t conscious or inherently good.
What could this objective and unchanging good be that transcends humans and the universe? God
@@lovespeaks777 easy one. there just is no objective good
@@jschneider8773Is there objective evil in your opinion?
"My book with talking donkeys proves everything I say to be true!"
Evidence proves it to be true
@@lovespeaks777 What evidence? There has never been any evidence of donkeys talking.
@@taylorthetunafish5737Would it be that hard to make a donkey speak if you can create a universe?
@@lovespeaks777 That is not evidence. Where is the evidence that a donkey talked?
@@taylorthetunafish5737Maybe we could build a Time Machine and go back and check
If you want to be Christian that’s fine. Don’t act like you are using logic or evidence when proving its validity.
One book says Jesus was god. You can’t use the claims in that book to prove the books validity as evidence.
If you’re response to that is “many other sources agree” then I challenge you to remake this video without using bible quran or other religious texts. Just use the other evidence and sources and run this back.
Do you need the Bible to prove Jesus was god or can you do it without it?
Do you need written sources to prove Alexander The Great existed? Should we trust those sources?
@@lovespeaks777 do you have the courage to answer my question? You made an assertion, I asked a question. Can you try to answer it?
You asking me a related but irrelevant question doesn’t help.
I’ll answer.
Yes. Alexander has immense evidence written or otherwise. any significant portion of it can be used to determine Alexander was real and existed.
None of the evidence references supernatural.
I didn’t ask if Jesus existed.
I asked: can you prove Jesus was god without the Bible?
If you don’t attempt to answer that authentically I can’t continue the discussion.
They didn’t have a N.T. when they believed Jesus was God. And I’m not going to just say the Bible isn’t reliable when it has been tested and tried and passed the test.
I don’t need the Bible to say God exists-He has proven His existence through the creation and our conscience. But to know Jesus is God and to know His teachings require a text passed down from after He was a man on earth.
@lovespeaks777 Nobody knows who wrote the Bible. That already makes it highly questionable.
"trust me bro I swear!"
Counter arguments?
bible is not proof as it simply states claims and refuses to back them up. what you have stated in the bible is something almost every religion does, make claims and not prove them.
however we can disprove certain claims that the bible does make, those being god is all loving and all powerful.
with all of the death and horrible things that happen in the world due to natural causes, children dying who will be sent to hell because they were part of another religion is not ever loving, now you could make the claim that god is unable to intervene, however it is also stated that god is all powerful, and thus choses to have these things happen to people who do not deserve it. It is also stated that god rested on the 7th day thus proving he has limits to what he is able to do. Now not only do I find it bizarre how much this personifies what is supposedly a tridimensional deity that takes no form, to even suggest that a concept that only is innate to that of lifeforms would apply to a deity that is said to take no form is bizarre to me.@@lovespeaks777
@@lovespeaks777 proof?
@@trixsisdeadThe Bible and non-biblical sources say Jesus existed, died under Roman crucifixion, was buried by a Jewish man named Joseph of Arimethea, the tomb was empty 3 days later, there were appearances of Him 3 days after His burial, and His followers were convinced He was raised from the dead against what their religion taught.
What’s your explanation of the resurrection of Christ?
@@lovespeaks777 That's not proof. It's wrong to present your opinion as fact, people who do such things persistently (like yourself) can come off as untrustworthy. Your not giving me anything of substance here, so either do that or don't bother.
how can god die ? cant he not defend himself?
@mohammadalbaghdadi1456 Jesus died for our sins to reconcile us back to God. It shows how loving God is and what He would go through to save us. Simply amazing
@@lovespeaks777 can you provide your evidence for this? please give your sources as well :)
@@gregsmith8977 we walk by faith not by sight.
@@gregsmith8977 so how can you prove that aristotle was real? because of the EYE WITNESSES. same way the eye witnesses saw jesus, and the same way they died while saying jesus was God.
@philippians41 and that's fine. the issue is when you try to force others to believe. it's just shitty behavior
Mate's entire argument was "Jesus 100% ressurected so christianity is right"
Did you miss the arguments for God in the beginning?
LOL. That's what happens when you rely on and believe what is in the Bible. The Bible can not be trusted for facts.
I'm sure if this guy got out into the sunshine and fresh air he wouldn't be so delusional. Good luck my friend.
Haha, this was before you were liking your own comments, Tbone!
Try again 😂
@@Uchihamadara-lx7wx Good luck my friend.
@@lovespeaks777 i mean your argument uses itself to support itself so it's not all that different
@@arkanon8661 Precisely. It's completely unfounded and ridiculous.
I notice a trend in modern society that tries to make Christian intentions to be good moral teachings. The road to Hell is paved with good intentions. We’re not here to be distracted by what’s on this Earth, our Lord suffered for our sake but not out of accident. Our sins and actions are so bad we had God nailed to a cross just to even give us a fighting chance. This is a daily battle that starts with our minds, we must deny ourselves daily, pray daily, love each other (yes even our enemies) daily and spread the Gospel daily.
We all know that Jesus was a woman and died on her back and not on a cross giving birth to the virgin marry. Gods chosen princess.
Sounds like paulianity and to believe in Trinity is too pegan.
god sacrificed himself to himself because a woman ate a magic apple. Sounds like the worst fiction I have ever heard.
God is a distraction from the light.
@@masterlee9822 from logic more like
It sounded better in his head
Haha 😆
@@lovespeaks777what do you think acts 2:32 ?? Because it literally disproves Jesus being dead through humiliation by his enemies??
@@Asiyah2000Not exactly what you’re trying to argue with that verse
So you're right and everyone who isn't just like you is wrong. Congratulations! Why don't you give us a heads up once you've convinced the entire world to be just like you. Because this is what God commands that you do.
Thanks for the comment. 2+2=4. It has one right answer and bazillions of wrong answers.
Let me know what you think of this:
th-cam.com/video/mDz8sYTH5fg/w-d-xo.html
@@lovespeaks777 did you even process the comment or give a binary output of "agrees with me / disagrees with me)
@@arkanon8661more reasonable question would be, if he HAS the ability to process your argument lol
@@arkanon8661 Snarky bad faith comments don't deserve serious responses.
@@sstewart218 i don’t think it’s in good faith to claim to prove every religion wrong and christianity right
thank you before this video I was a Muslim but after this video I still muslim
You trust what the Koran says about Jesus death, burial, and resurrection over the Bible even though it was written 600 years after the events?
@@lovespeaks777 Jesus is not dead in Islam
@@vs-vh4sgDid He die on the cross according to your view? Was He resurrected? That’s what the Bible says, which was written within the generation of the eyewitnesses.
@@lovespeaks777 Your Holy Book is distorted, and the evidence is that the people who transmitted it, about whom we know nothing, may be lying, unlike the Qur’an, which is the only book that was transmitted as it was revealed from God. The Qur’an says that Jesse was not crucified, but rather God raised him to heaven until the end of time
@@vs-vh4sgreally?
th-cam.com/video/1c15EmERsZg/w-d-xo.htmlsi=HqR88uy9Nun-I1h8
Glory be to The Father, The Son and The Holy Spirit Amen
3
i said that through a Ouija Board do u think god will come through 🤔🤔
th-cam.com/video/fgogHmQZ6c8/w-d-xo.html
Amen
You honestly don't believe ghosts are real. Do you?
the fact that this can just be made up is scary, just thinking about a god that allows suffering is saddening
@Decton Let’s say the Bible was all made up, which I don’t believe is reasonable, the arguments for God’s existence would still be strong. If you haven’t studied them, I would check them out
@@lovespeaks777 god is just a made up thing to believe in because we as people wouldn't have much else to hold on
also, if this god exists why would we be able to believe in other religions and why would it be our destiny to get his view across since he's a god, he could do anything, so why do it like this, this is so fucking stupid lol
@@Decton you must understand that God is not logical, we cannot understand why everything, but we can with the our hearth have a relationship whith him (sorry for bad english ha ha)
@@user-jh3ze8or2hso god is not logical and thus we don't know his motives, but our heart can?
The thing that pumps Oxygen rich blood through our veins?
@@lovespeaks777okay but the Bible contradicts itself. So that means all religion is debunked. Which makes sense cause everyone agrees the earth millions if not billions of years old. Meaning the Bible is false. One wrong fact disproves the rest of the writing does it not? If we have a math book but know that one of the methods is incorrect but can't prove the rest right or wrong, we don't consider it to be a source. Therefore that would prove the Bible to be an unreliable source. There are other facts I can state but I don't feel the need to.
Make believe is fun, that is why I like Christianity.
Are you a theist?
@@lovespeaks777 No and forgive me for the snarky comment. You might call me an optimistic Faithist, or one who believes in a spiritual gestalt but tries very hard not to attribute too much to it. I know I will die and only get the gist of our place in the universe (and meta-universe) and I don't get bent out of shape knowing that I do not know (as a single person) very much. In religion there is this gigantic hubris of pretending to know when only perhaps 5% is actually accurate and on the right path.
@@williamwightman8409Your thoughts on Jesus and His teachings?
@@lovespeaks777 Jesus (and Buddha, Krishna...) are what might be called highest-good metaphorical condensates or exemplars. They are not there to be worshiped, they are formed out of the collective unconscious onto paper as an example of what is possible for each person. Holy documents should never be taken literally, only metaphorically. They are signposts, not recipes.
Can you make this argument drawing from evidence and sources outside the Bible? If not, you've not really proven anything but that a man-made collection of text has specific words in it.
What makes the Bible unreliable? What makes the authors have to be liars?
the question isn't "what makes the bible unreliable?", the question is "why is the Bible more reliable than other written sources?"
also, the bible is unreliable because it was written by people. and people don't always speak the truth
@@lovespeaks777 it's unverified. it could have been written by a group of people just trying to be funny. we have no clue.
@@lovespeaks777Simple, bias.
"If you study the arguments for God's existence, you end up with a monotheistic God"
But who originated the cosmological argument? The furthest back we know is Aristotle, who was indeed a monist (believing in a supreme being), but also a devout polytheistic worshipper of the Greek Gods like all around him. The cosmological argument is a pagan argument made originally to other pagans. Monism =/= monotheism: it was common for many polytheistic cultures to believe in a supreme being (including also the Canaanites, who worshipped El, and the pre-Islamic Arabs who worshipped Allah the creator, and most polytheistic Hindus who worship Brahman, etc.).
The defining characteristic of monotheism has never been the belief in a supreme being, but belief in the jealousy of that being.
@EdricoftheWeald Here is a deductive argument of why there must be a monotheistic God.
1. God is defined as a perfect being.
2. To be perfect is to lack nothing.
3. No two beings are identical.
4. This means that one must lack something the other possesses.
5. The one that lacked something would not be perfect, and therefore, not be God.
6. Therefore, one can only be God.
@@lovespeaks777 Thank you but there is a linguistic misunderstanding. For thousands of years in all parts of the world except Judea/Israel, a "god/deus/theos/gudanaz/kami/ilah" was never conceived of as a perfect being, or even a particular class of beings, but any spirit that is honoured in order to create a relationship between people and the universe they lived in. For the Romans there were thousands of small gods in any forest or village. Gods were seen as forces of nature, and they didn't have to be moral guides (the Greeks certainly didn't want to imitate their gods), and just like the universe is imperfect, they embodied that imperfection and gave them a way to reconcile with it on a personal level. Aristotle's argument applies well to a perfect supreme being (which may or may not be called God depending on the culture), but it's a misunderstanding to put the Abrahamic view of of the word "God" or "Deity" (assumed to be a perfect and almighty being) as if it were majority view of history. On a different note, there is an issue with 4.-6., as it implies the essence of divinity cannot exist in different persons: if it doesn't imply that, and permits trinitarianism, then it just as well permits one of the Hindu views of all deities being persons of Brahman. Or the Wiccan view that all goddesses are one Goddess, all gods are one God, and that both are dual aspects of one supreme being, perfect in ways that seem imperfect because we cannot see.
@@EdricoftheWealdI would say that when you study the arguments for God’s existence you end up with an extremely powerful, intelligent, personal, good being. There are problems with thinking several gods made everything and sustain it all. If they were at all in disagreement, things wouldn’t sustain as they do. And then what god made the earth? What god made humans? What god is sustaining this universe? Are they all objectively morally good?
@@lovespeaks777God lacks sin
Bro tell me if hinduism is false ,what does vedas tell us about (written evidences) which are older than ur religion
This is a bit of a cherry pick, since you're only using one gospel to make your point. If you want to strengthen your point you need to account for the differences the gospels entail. I don't mean this as an insult. Merely as constructive criticism.
One gospel?
@@lovespeaks777I re-watched the video and realized I was only rebutting a small snippet of the video, not the entire argument. Makes my argument a bit disingenuous. Got tunnel vision, my bad.
@@chadmorrison3662 It’s all good.
Some bronze age shepherds said they totally saw Jesus after he was dead, so it must be true, one hundred percent. ONE HUNDRED PERCENT! No bronze age barbarians ever lied to anyone, or wrote down a story centuries after everyone involved had died that turned out to be untrue. Boom! Proof that Christianity is sane and totally believable.
And so we shouldn’t trust anything that was written down that we haven’t seen with our own eyes? Washington wasn’t president, Alexander the Great didn’t exist, etc.
@@lovespeaks777well, well well we actually have historical evidence regarding that stuff.
We shouldn't trust documents that attest to impossible events, no. It's amazing that I have to say something like this to living Americans. I mean, don't you have ANY capacity to resist believing in bullshit? It blows my nmind.
@@cuaticanWhat makes these events impossible? Is it just because they don’t fit your worldview?
@@lovespeaks777 It's impossible for a man to be tortured and die of exposure on a cross, and then for that man a few days later to chit chat with people all around town. Either he wasn't seen alive after being murdered, or he never died in the first place. Why do I have to explain the impossibility of these things? Zombies don't exist, man. People don't come back from the dead. Why does this need to be said? There is no "worldview" that accommodates the existence of zombies. People who believe in the risen dead are intellectually deficient or insane.
im pretty sure he made this vid only to get engagement in the comments and to fool the yt algorithm
I don't doubt it.
Have you studied the arguments for God’s existence?
@@lovespeaks777 yoo just found this random book in my house saying humans came from rocks is that now a fact or what
in your thumbnail, there was a religion name "Buddhism", can you tell me why the hell you did this?
Because Buddhism is a religion
My guy woke up and thought that he could disprove some of the most deepest and oldest religions in 2 minutes by saying
'well jesus woke from the dead so...'😂
LOL. It's always good for a laugh, right?
That’s if you believe that particular comic book.
@davidwilliams9997 What evidence do you have that God doesn’t exist?
Slavery
@@lovespeaks777 burden of proof fallacy, you're not very smart, are you?
God is not to be mocked, we are like a raindrop compared to him, there is no way our smarts would compare to him, and your saying someone isn't smart just because they disagree with you, and yet the creator of this video is not smart, thats a joke.@@AURESHION
@@KristofirWhiteNo I said he isn't very smart because he used a logical fallacy. He's also just incorrect about a lot of things. but I questioned his smarts purely because he did something that was not very smart.
Also your wording confused me at the end there. What joke are you referring to exactly?
That they said (in boast), "We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Messenger of Allah";- but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not:- ( Surah Nisa - 157 )
"Here's my interpretation and I'm right because I say so."
Ignored all the arguments?
@@lovespeaks777 you are the one who ignore half the evidence for legit most things
Have you ever considered other religions having a possibility of being true?
Yep.
imagine being this delusional omg 💀💀💀
It’s hard to imagine 😀
@@lovespeaks777 Yeah, you wouldn't have to imagine being delusional would you?
@@nikidelvalleHaha
Imagine being so ignorant that you exchange The truth of God for a lie!!!
Well spoken, Brother! I'm reminded of Romans 10:9: "If you declare with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, then you will be saved."
@dadmatty177 Thank you! Amen!!
bullshit 😂😂
@@INFINITESYKOSISYour rebuttal?
@@lovespeaks777 nobody can prove nothing everybody say u just don't know 🤷♂
@@INFINITESYKOSISWhat’s your counterargument to the moral argument?
basically this video: if you studied the arguments you would know christianity is right im just pointing out the obvious i dont have to do shi-
Have you studied the arguments?
If you ever feel stupid remember that this guy exist😂
Arguments?
this proves nothing delete this video 😂😂
@INFINITESYKOSIS Just saying someone is wrong without giving evidence or arguments of why you’re right and someone else is wrong makes me wonder why certain people believe what they believe.
@@lovespeaks777 samething i said 🤔
@@lovespeaks777 just claiming you're right without providing evidence makes me wonder why you think you have the intellectual high-ground here.
@@lovespeaks777 equally for you, you provided no proof and practically no evidence
This only works on little kids lol! 🤣
I guess hydrozoan Turritopsis dohrnii is god now by this logic since they're immortal.
@Sheikh_Muslimus Do you have an argument for your beliefs, or are you just saying we’re wrong?
@@lovespeaks777 My argument is that simply saying that because a man got revived from the dead dosen't mean he's god, infact by that logic the Anti-Christ would also be God.
@@Mufti_Revan Well said my friend.
Why you guys need to Bring other religions to prove Christianity? Also your shlt doesnt prove anything
It wasn’t mocking other religions. Other religions think we are wrong as well
"and for boasting, “We killed the Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, the messenger of Allah.” But they neither killed nor crucified him-it was only made to appear so. Even those who argue for this ˹crucifixion˺ are in doubt. They have no knowledge whatsoever-only making assumptions. They certainly did not kill him."
@dorimes.g1587 If you really understand what Jesus endured from the accounts we have, it’s a very illogical view to say He didn’t die on the cross for so many reasons. For one, many people didn’t even survive Roman scourging, which Jesus had to endure before carrying His cross, and then quickly after He was crucified. At the end of the crucifixion, they stabbed Him in the lungs and heart with a spear. Jesus was certainly dead.
Let’s say hypothetically Jesus some how survived-which would be impossible-why would His disciples preach their Messiah and King rose from the dead when He was a body that was ripped apart and mangled? He would have looked like a horror movie victim. And then the record shows they preached Jesus was God and Messiah and died horrible deaths, not willing to deny He rose from the dead.
I don't know what that first thing is but Judaism doesn't consider how Jesus fit a lot of the criteria for the messiah and Islam came after Christianity so to believe in the Quran is to believe that god either made a mistake that big with the Bible or tricked his people on purpose.
I wonder what happened to the people who died before Jesus was born. Those people had no chance to accept Jesus as their Messiah since he wasn't born yet. So did God betray all those billions of people by not giving them the chance to accept Jesus? Or was there a way to heaven before he was born which means sending Jesus was unnecessary?
It’s a good question. The Bible talks about God judging people according to how they respond to the light they have. A couple ways He judges are how people respond to the creation and their conscience
@@lovespeaks777 God judged the people by how they followed the Torah.
😂😂😂😂 Christ quote old testament many Times...so your saying Jewish old testament is wrong.
If you say Judaism is wrong then who's the father Jesus talking about😂😂😂😂😂..is it not the old testament father ?
We don’t say the O.T. Is wrong. And the O.T. spoke about Jesus’s coming
That's... pretty stupid...
I might be an atheist, but every religion has a place in society, and should always be respected.
Christians have no respect for other religions
They should be respected if they say to harm others that don’t believe what they believe?
When did I say that? Hell is a real place according to the scriptures, but I’m not sure what everyone’s judgment will be. But aren’t I trying to help people to stay away from such a place?
@@lovespeaks777that means Jesus has no mercy cause if you go to hell you stay for ever but if it was in Islam you will be saved unless you don’t reach the last gate
It’s not about doing good works to get to heaven. We couldn’t do enough good works to get there. It’s about being reconciled to God. The only way is through the sacrifice of Jesus.
th-cam.com/video/mDz8sYTH5fg/w-d-xo.html
This is a short video about the message of Christianity we made.
What are the chances out of thousands of deities that have been worshiped, yours is the right one? but of course YOU are the exception, oh wait that's what everyone else thinks.
👍👍
Because ours has the best evidence.
@@lovespeaks777 have you studied all of the other religions? their denominations and personal encounters? or do you just assume yours has the best evidence because you were told from a young age to believe in Jesus?
@@Sam_Hyde_ApologistYea, when I see many religions don’t believe in God or they believe in many gods, I reject them because they aren’t compatible with the arguments for God’s existence. And many religions focus on glorifying man-not God, which makes it obvious they’re man-made.
@@lovespeaks777 duh 🤣🤣🤣 they are all based on pagan myths 👍👍
I'm Muslim and I respect all of your beliefs. But I'm sorry if I missed something but this does not prove anything. It just proves that Christianity believes in Jesus (pbuh) as their god.
@solivi I believe Jesus proved He was God because of the miracles He did and His resurrection from the dead. My contention with the Koran is it says Jesus didn’t die on the cross. Not only is there great evidence from biblical and non-biblical sources about this, but why should I believe the Koran’s testimony when it was written 600 years after Christ?
@@lovespeaks777 Jesus never said in the bible directly that he is god. The Quran was authored by a prophet a man whose whole life was written. These words that he says have been revelated from Allah (swt) to him. The bible was written by a man (or men) whom you only know their first names. How can you trust a man whom you know nothing about?
@@solivi44 What did Jesus say when he was arrested?
@@lovespeaks777 yes Jesus did not die on the cross he is heaven waiting for the day of resurrection when he will see that people followed him as a god. Isa (as) is the messiah who will kill the fake messiah. And no matter how much you believe in Jesus you will believe the false messiah as your god. And I don't need you opinion on this because it's clear you will deny. I'm warning you just like how Allah warned me. Everything is left to you. Don't be led astray.
@@lovespeaks777 I'm not so sure as bible and christians are saying different thing but in Islam Isa (as) never got arrested but some one that looked like him did if you want a more detailed ver. ask me.
Okay gentle man, your sound feels good. But I have some questions which are bothering me a lot.
Why you people changed your holly book? Why you made new testament according to your wish?
Why you kneel before the son of god? Why you are not kneeling before god?
We didn’t change our book. We didn’t make the canon, we discovered it. And we worship Jesus because He is God.
@@lovespeaks777 So you discovered it. Well, old testament doesn't allow drinking alcohols(Bears).
Why you added that in new testament???
@@lovespeaks777the books you discovered contains corruption
Why is bro whispering?
That's his "hey kids free candy in the back of my white van" voice.
Fall Out
i can name ten more religions from like the top of my head
And?
@@lovespeaks777 you only looked at a few, and immediately determined that the religion that you follow is accurate.
or none are real and atheism is all that is real
You are most probably correct my friend. There has never been any proof showing Gods existence.
T-BOOONNNEEEEE!!!!
@@TboneWTFI liked your comment by the way
Ever thought that what you're saying is just "not true", and eye-witness accounts from 2000 years ago may be kind of inaccurate?
You also didn't disprove deism, many other religions accept that Jesus was real, he's just not God, but that doesn't mean you DISPROVED the entirety of Hinduism, Jainism, Sikhism, Zoroastrianism, Baha'i, Confucianism, Shinto, Taoism or any other kind.
Was George Washington president of the United States? Did he even exist?
How judaism is wrong if jesus was jewish
Because Judaism would say Jesus wasn’t God or Messiah
I’m sorry but this is stupid because the whole video rests on the assumption that there is a god
What evidence have you found that there isn’t a God?
@@lovespeaks777 let me ask you this what evidence have you found that there is a God? none great before you say your bible its so easily faked in so many ways but have you ever seen that sky daddy you so believe in if heaven is filled with ppl who are this stupid id rather go to hell since atleast the ppl there might have an higher iq than what ever this vid is also do you believe in the flying whale who shat out this universe?
Prove I am not the God you worship so much.
Can you atlest explain why angels were given flesh abd lay with tye duagthers of man ?
Odin has been seen countless times in the guise of a cloaked traveler.
Thor is heard around the world almost every single day.
Heimdall's rainbow bridge is also visible almost every day (somewhere around the world).
Loki continues to cause mischief and mayhem, makes things go missing, starts arguments between friends, spouses, and more.
Freyr continues to give good harvests around the world.
Frigg continues to bless mothers and families.
Freya still provides humans with fertility and love.
Tyr continues to tempt leaders and soldiers to warfare.
The fates continue to cut threads wherever anyone dies.
But the thing you jump on as proof for your religion is that a few people a couple thousand years ago said someone wasn't in a tomb after a crucifixion.
Started with the arguments for God’s existence
He has been seen by people for forty days may be because he never died on the cross ?
If you really understand what Jesus endured from the accounts we have, it’s a very illogical view to say He didn’t die for so many reasons. For one, many people didn’t even survive Roman scourging, which Jesus had to endure before carrying His cross, and then quickly after He was crucified. At the end of the crucifixion, they stabbed Him in the lungs and heart with a spear. Jesus was certainly dead.
Let’s say hypothetically Jesus some how survived-which would be impossible-why would His disciples preach their Messiah and King rose from the dead when He was a body that was ripped apart and mangled? He would have looked like a horror movie victim. And then the record shows they preached Jesus was God and Messiah and died horrible deaths, not willing to deny He rose from the dead.
Jesus rose from the dead is the best explanation of His passion story.
No any historian can tell you that isnt even a possible option.
Most go with the "mass hallucination" theory, that everyone hallucinated the exact same guy, saying the exact same things... and I guess all the while Jesus' followers somehow got past an army of roman guards and hid Jesus' body.
I dont know about you but sounds a little ridiculous to me.
But you might say so does a man coming back from the dead... so you know I guess choose your flavor of ridiculous. Lets hope you choose correctly.
That was one of the least convincing arguments I've ever heard in my life.
Have you studied the arguments for God’s existence?
I'm talking about the circular logic in your argument here. You claim Christianity is the true religion because of the resurrection story, which you attempt to prove by referencing the resurrection story.
@@Alex-lm7cx this is what he ment most likely 😅 the new testament is like someone's mail, or rather it is! The NT is like a newspaper that people saw back then. Thousands of NT's were made talking about the reserection. 500 and more people saw Jesus alive after they saw Him die, so they wrote it to show people He's alive and after they read it, they probably went out to see Him. So yes, Jesus is real, the NT is basicly a newspaper for the current thing back then they they saw
Rumours feed on Rumours
@@Alex-lm7cxhow can you prove resurrection didn’t happen? If the person is resurrected how can one even prove of his existence until the shroud of turin, if you know what I mean. Look, if there’s ever a perfect so called religion, why won’t everyone worship that single religion alone and not be divided followers of other religions right? There’s no true religion in the end it’s just good things by Jesus, as I don’t see personally Christianity to be a religion but following in his teachings as much as possible.
So when do you start proving anything? Claims aren’t evidence, you need evidence to validate the claims of the Bible.
th-cam.com/video/_ZV2nMmMJFk/w-d-xo.htmlsi=Mc62B4Q7_HK9WZz9
What if I where to write something down, that claims me to be god, and people start to believe it. Does that make it true because people believed it, or is it still wrong despite people beliving lies I wrote down. You cannot prove something like a God, and you also cannot disprove other religions with the argument of "I studied and there can only be 1 god"
There are many arguments for God’s existence, and they are strong arguments compared to their opposition. And the arguments for God’s existence give evidence for there being 1 God-not many gods.
@@lovespeaks777 which arguments, you cant say this and not name any
If you watched the video, they are listed in the beginning
@@lovespeaks777at least half of those are bs arguments. Humans developed morals through living in societies that required us to understand what is right and wrong to work together. Fine tuning assumes that "because things work, there is a god!" if things didn't work, then nobody would be here, however because of all the lucky things that happened, we are here. Assuming that there must be a higher power at play is pure speculation.
I am constantly surprised by the fact, that without saying anything of value, people actually can sound somewhat intelligent. There is so much wrong with this video, that can't and don't even want to comprehend it all. Just the fact that someone tries to explain all the complexity of all the FUNDAMENTAL things in the universe in just a minute is pure horror. It is terrifying to see, that so many believe in this nonesense.
Some objections please
I strongly agree with this
@@PaloMwaba-ch3po Some objections?
bro you are talking to a wall right now. Where is your claim to prove that he is wrong. 2 problems eventually lead to a solution and you aren't even giving him a problem to work with lol.
@@Dephor0 What 2 problems are you talking about? I don't give him a problem, what?? And "Where is your claim to prove that he is wrong." My claim is up there up there. No seriously. I told you up there that the amount of work i would have to do to seriously debunk just 1 of his "arguments" is not worth a youtube comment, But go on, tell me one "argument" and i'll try to swiftly debunk it.
What I have come to believe is that if a person is on a journey seeking nothing but the TRUTH, all roads lead to God. I made a decision when I was 9 years old after encountering a nasty hypocrite whether I was going to spend my life living with pretty lies, or facing uncomfortable truths. I chose the latter. I am so glad that I did because I am so strong in my convictions because of it. I do not have any cognitive dissonance because I refuse to let ideas in if they are easily proved false. & because of that I dont hate people who are caught up in pretty lies, I think that they are just seeking temporary comfort because they chose the former path.
It took me 30 years on this planet but I have come to know Jesus Christ as my Lord & savior. There is no way I can look upon all of the demonic evil doing of people in power (both left & right) & not believe that there is a god. There is spiritual warfare happening all around us, & we have been divided & nearly conquered as a country that was once founded on christian principles. They succeeded by removing God from our lives. That was one of the first things they did.
The beauty of it all is, they can do whatever they want to my body, but they can never have my soul. That belongs to our Lord. I dont fear evil doers anymore because I have the light of god within me. & it is more real than anything else I have experienced in my life. I was blind but now I see, I was lost but now I am found.
Thank you for this short video. Just my ramblings.
Praise the Lord and thanks for sharing your testimony! Once I tasted and saw that the Lord was good, I’ve wanted everyone else to enjoy Him as well! He is so so truly good. I agree, if people truly seek the Lord, they will find Him.
I was apathetic about God and religion until my early 20’s. Someone shared the gospel with me and I became a Christian. The best choice I’ve ever made and the Lord has done amazing things in my life, even though it is still tough at times.
Anyways, I was really encouraged by your testimony and God bless you! 🙏
@@lovespeaks777 This video didn't really prove anything that Christianity is true and other religions are false but of course I believe Christianity is the true religion but I feel like this video didn't prove why?
Fantastic! The Lord Jesus Christ bless you today and always 🙏
@@kofizayn6077 Do you know the arguments for God’s existence? If not, study them and you’ll end up with a monotheistic God. There are 4 religions that are monotheistic as I said in the video. They all make mutually exclusive claims, especially about Christ, so they can’t all be right. Therefore, you must conduct an investigation of whether or not any of them are true.
@@lovespeaks777 this is easy to debunk
Can anyone answer why did Jesus came so late and if he was the only path to God then what about the humans before him who existed were there no way to heavens for them
And please give the source and also feel free to provide some scientific evidence of its existence
No offence tho and if you want to debate me or want to spread something please let me know your discord id
😂😂 How does Jesus dying or not have to do with God?
Because if Jesus died as God in the flesh, that means your sins are atoned for if you repent and believe the gospel.
you tried that in the crusades already, didnt work
I didn’t try anything in the crusades-I wasn’t there.
this is why eye witness evidence is the weakest form of evidence
How do we know Alexander the Great existed? Or that George Washington was president?
Imagine a reaction of three guys named galileo galilei, giordano bruno and nicolas copernicus when you say to them "christianity is the only true religion"
What do you think is the true religion?
@@lovespeaks777
Over 30,000 changes were made in the b.i.b.l.e of which more than 5,000 represent differences between the Greek text used for the Revised Version and that used as the basis of the King James Version. Most of the other changes were made in the interest of consistency or modernization.
Source: britannica
Gabriel brought the word of God to Muhammad verbatim, and the Quran was divinely protected from any alteration or change. The Quran emphasizes that Muhammad was required only to receive the sacred text and that he had no authority to change it.
Source: wikipedia
The Quran, which was revealed fourteen centuries ago, mentioned facts only recently discovered or proven by scientists. These are just some of the many scientific facts found in the Quran.
Source: research gate
@@lovespeaks777
Islam
Feel free to ask any question because i can answer any of them
@@lovespeaks777
According to britannica, more than 30.000 changes were made in the bible.
But according to wikipedia, quran is not changed at all
وَلَوْ أَنَّنَا نَزَّلْنَا إِلَيْهِمُ الْمَلَائِكَةَ وَكَلَّمَهُمُ الْمَوْتَىٰ وَحَشَرْنَا عَلَيْهِمْ كُلَّ شَيْءٍ قُبُلًا مَّا كَانُوا لِيُؤْمِنُوا إِلَّا أَن يَشَاءَ اللَّـهُ وَلَـٰكِنَّ أَكْثَرَهُمْ يَجْهَلُونَ
And even if We had sent down to them the angels [with the message] and the dead spoke to them [of it] and We gathered together every [created] thing in front of them, they would not believe unless Allah should will. But most of them, [of that], are ignorant.
وَقَالَ فِرْعَوْنُ يَا أَيُّهَا الْمَلَأُ مَا عَلِمْتُ لَكُم مِّنْ إِلَـٰهٍ غَيْرِي فَأَوْقِدْ لِي يَا هَامَانُ عَلَى الطِّينِ فَاجْعَل لِّي صَرْحًا لَّعَلِّي أَطَّلِعُ إِلَىٰ إِلَـٰهِ مُوسَىٰ وَإِنِّي لَأَظُنُّهُ مِنَ الْكَاذِبِينَ
And Pharaoh said, “O eminent ones, I have not known you to have a god other than me. Then ignite for me, O Haman, [a fire] upon the clay and make for me a tower that I may look at the God of Moses. And indeed, I do think he is among the liars.”
إِنَّ الدِّينَ عِندَ اللَّـهِ الْإِسْلَامُ
Indeed, the religion in the sight of Allah is Islam.
إِنَّا أَنزَلْنَاهُ قُرْآنًا عَرَبِيًّا لَّعَلَّكُمْ تَعْقِلُونَ
Indeed, We have sent it down as an Arabic Qur’an that you might understand.
الْحَمْدُ لِلَّـهِ الَّذِي أَنزَلَ عَلَىٰ عَبْدِهِ الْكِتَابَ وَلَمْ يَجْعَل لَّهُ عِوَجًا ۜ
[All] praise is [due] to Allah, who has sent down upon His Servant the Book and has not made therein any deviance.
وَلَقَدْ يَسَّرْنَا الْقُرْآنَ لِلذِّكْرِ فَهَلْ مِن مُّدَّكِرٍ
And We have certainly made the Qur’an easy for remembrance, so is there any who will remember?
قُل لَّئِنِ اجْتَمَعَتِ الْإِنسُ وَالْجِنُّ عَلَىٰ أَن يَأْتُوا بِمِثْلِ هَـٰذَا الْقُرْآنِ لَا يَأْتُونَ بِمِثْلِهِ وَلَوْ كَانَ بَعْضُهُمْ لِبَعْضٍ ظَهِيرًا
Say, “If mankind and the jinn gathered in order to produce the like of this Qur’an, they could not produce the like of it, even if they were to each other assistants.”
أَفَلَا يَتَدَبَّرُونَ الْقُرْآنَ ۚ وَلَوْ كَانَ مِنْ عِندِ غَيْرِ اللَّـهِ لَوَجَدُوا فِيهِ اخْتِلَافًا كَثِيرًا
Then do they not reflect upon the Qur’an? If it had been from [any] other than Allah, they would have found within it much contradiction.
Quran [4:82]
ذَٰلِكَ الْكِتَابُ لَا رَيْبَ ۛ فِيهِ ۛ هُدًى لِّلْمُتَّقِينَ
This is the Book about which there is no doubt, a guidance for those conscious of Allah
إِنَّا نَحْنُ نَزَّلْنَا الذِّكْرَ وَإِنَّا لَهُ لَحَافِظُونَ
“Indeed, it is We who sent down the Qur’an and indeed, We will be its guardian.”
أَمْ يَقُولُونَ افْتَرَاهُ ۖ قُلْ فَأْتُوا بِعَشْرِ سُوَرٍ مِّثْلِهِ مُفْتَرَيَاتٍ وَادْعُوا مَنِ اسْتَطَعْتُم مِّن دُونِ اللَّـهِ إِن كُنتُمْ صَادِقِينَ
Or do they say, “He invented it”? Say, “Then bring ten surahs [chapters] like it that have been invented and call upon [for assistance] whomever you can besides Allah, if you should be truthful.”
وَإِن كُنتُمْ فِي رَيْبٍ مِّمَّا نَزَّلْنَا عَلَىٰ عَبْدِنَا فَأْتُوا بِسُورَةٍ مِّن مِّثْلِهِ وَادْعُوا شُهَدَاءَكُم مِّن دُونِ اللَّـهِ إِن كُنتُمْ صَادِقِينَ
And if you are in doubt about what We have sent down upon Our Servant [Muhammad], then produce a surah [chapter] the like thereof and call upon your witnesses other than Allah, if you should be truthful.
(I have respect for Christianity)
(islam and Christianity are brothers)
I believe that god is Allah because Jesus was a prophet
please don’t hate on islam😊
I have respect to Christianity
I’m not trying to prove that Christianity is wronge
I just gave my opinion 😊👍🏻
Man just speedran fascism in 1 minute and 13 seconds
How do you justify calling us fascists?
@@lovespeaks777 Imma take the lord's name in vain and say JESUS CHRIST MAN I'M NOT TRYNA DO A COMMENT SECTION BATTLE
Ok but fr you're asking me that when you're saying that christianity is the superior religion and that every other one is wrong and false? Get a life, talk to people with differing opinions. Religion is a thing of the house.
@@Mantixion So if a religion says that we should murder people that don't believe what we do, we shouldn't say it is wrong? If someone were to tell you 2+2=5,000, you wouldn't have any issues with that?
We stand for truth and there are a lot of false teachings out there. The truth about God and life is of utmost importance and there are important implications for whatever we believe.
@@lovespeaks777 Opinion is not fact. "2+2=4" is not "God is real". Murder is not a religion. A false teaching is the operation you're running here. Even some personal connections of mine who are christian would immediately invalidate this. Get past this and start contributing to the wellfare of people the system folks like you set in place screwed over.
@@lovespeaks777man not the same “2+2 is 4” analogy. Analysing what religion is true isn’t the same as asking what is 2+2. U were born and brought up a Christian im gonna assume, so u already have the assumption it is correct and then u use the facts that u have and place it in ways that satisfy it. Thats not rationally analysing, rather it is rationalising.
The likeliness that any religion is right is infinitely close to zero. The reason, people are responsible for maintaining religion. People have desires and ambitions, any possible truth that religion holds would have been abolished long ago, as these truths would interfere with the interests of those in power.
Don't say that god maintains these truths or would protect a religion. If god interfered in any way with us, there wouldn't be children sold sexually by their parents for drugs.
People hold correct and incorrect views all the time, regardless if they’re in power or not. As for the Bible, you can look at all the evidence of how the actual texts have not changed over time
@@lovespeaks777
First, this isn't a matter of correct or incorrect views. During feudal society, those in power would never tolerate anything that challenged their rule or affected their interests. Second, there are recorded cases in history where religious leaders have met to change texts in the bible and religious documents. Not to mention, the meetings to determine inclusion and exclusion of content to the bible are admitted to have been carried out by the church.
You want a good example, according to the traditional catholic bible, divorce was banned. When the Presbyterian church was founded, this text banning divorce was altered, permitting divorce, but only by men stating that women had no right to divorce. It was once again changed so that both men and woman can choose to divorce by excluding the text mentioning men and women. The second change occurred in the 1950s. This is only a recent example.
Finally, noticed how you ignored the last line in my previous post. If god interfered in the world, drug addict parents wouldn't be able to send their children to the beds of drug dealers in exchange for drugs. Even today, this type of thing occurs, and isn't reported in the news to protect the child victims.
If the ancient people of the time gor proof of resurrection, we in the 21st century want it too. Ask him to come and show himself to us for just 4 days , and we will all believe.
Even if Jesus showed Himself in person to many, they wouldn’t believe. And they’d be more accountable. We have plenty of evidence for the existence of God and the resurrection.
That's a nice sentiment my friend, but of course it can and will never happen. Magic and fantasy can not exist in reality.
Can you prove your argument without the bible ? If not, then your video proves nothing. @@lovespeaks777
@@lovespeaks777Answer me this: If the Hindu gods came down to you and proved to you CLEARLY that they are real and that Christianity is wrong with evidence, would you believe in them?
If your answer is "no" I say: Why? Aren't you interested in what's true?
If your answer is "yes" I say: Didn't you just say many wouldn't believe even if Jesus came down to us? So why do you say YOU would believe? A bit hypocritical, no?
fine tuning is not a good argument. It assumes what it is trying to conclude. How can we know that the physical constants are on this so called "razor edge" and that someone finely tuned it. It is an assumption made for the argument to make sense.
It’s an assumption that all of the constants just happened by chance and for no purpose
@@lovespeaks777 i dont claim that they happended by chance. I am just pointing out that we dont know anything about how these came to be, so its dumb to make any claim whatsoever about likehood or such.
@lovespeaks777 there is no purpose...so what??
@@karlbjerke133 When we see a building we know it had a builder. How with this infinitely more complex universe do we reason it had no creator or designer? What makes that view more reasonable?
@@lovespeaks777 Thats just a statement for your own ignorance which you won’t admit. You dont know how the universe works so you assume it works how you want it to. And if you want to argue cause and effect you are going to have to do better than to say the universe needed a cause, which is god, but god doesn’t need a cause. If you want to draw the line arbitrary you have to reason for it.
What are the fundamental requirements to be the Messiah. A decentent from king David thru Solomon and be Jewish. How is one Jewish? It based on the mother. How does one have a tribal connection? Through the physical biological father. Who was his biological father? According to Luke and Mathew a spirt. Like Hercules son of Jupiter. So he isn't the Messiah.
Let me know what you think of this:
th-cam.com/video/mDz8sYTH5fg/w-d-xo.html
@@lovespeaks777 seems like a whole hell of a lot of unfounded yap
This video needed to be way longer than 1 minute to establish the ways in which the Bible agrees with historic record.
Wasn’t meant to be comprehensive-meant to be concise
@@lovespeaks777 did a shit job at both
Visnuh the hindu god did the same so with krsna he came so that humanty cold live in peace over 5000 years ago why is your version more rigth?
Amen! God bless you. Thank you for this video. Do you have an email for Christian can reach out to you? I would like to ask for your feedback on a short booklet I wrote about the Christian faith.
Sure, sounds good! You can reach out to me at esl8185@yahoo.com. Blessings 🙏
@@lovespeaks777Thank you so much! I just emailed you. Have a blessed day today.
You as well!
Alhamdulillah... Allah will serve justice... may Allah opens the innocence of humanity's knowledge into Allah. Indeed if these people will be blessed by Allah they will not going to do this cruelty to thier fellowman. But thier lack and innocence of knowledge to Allah lead them this way... May Allah guide the Zionist people into Allah's path... For indeed Palestine sacrifices thier lives inorder for these innocent people to be saved in this Dunya. Ameen yah Allah....🤗
Does Allah love sinners?
bomber
@@lovespeaks777 Yes, Allah is more forgiving to you than you are to yourself and he knows your intentions. Every single chapter (except one) starts with "In the name of Allah (God), the most merciful, the most kind"
@@joyh2320allah is satan
@@lovespeaks777 Ar Rahman.
There are no successful arguments for the existence of a god-entity, nor is there any evidence for one.
Now, who was holding my beer?
@thefuturist8864 What are your arguments that God doesn’t exist?
@@lovespeaks777 read the comment, there is no evidence/successful arguments for it
you need to provide evidence he does exist anyway, as you are the proposing side here
An imaginary gay hater in the sky is real because a vastly unprovable magic book says so
@daffydpowell Have you studied the arguments for God’s existence? Like the cosmological, moral, teleological, fine-tuning, ontological arguments? I started with those because they are very strong arguments to prove the existence of God. If you then conclude God exists, you can look to see if any religions are compatible with what those arguments portray. We believe Jesus proved that He was God because of His resurrection from the dead, which is why Christianity would be true.
You literally stated something with no conclusive evidence and called it "proof"
You literally said I was wrong without proving it to be true
@@lovespeaks777 I proved it to be wrong by saying there is no conclusive evidence.
@@Freefs1 what proof do you have that George Washington was the president of the United States?
"If you study the arguments for god's existence, you'll end up with a monotheistic god..." WHY?
Over 3000K gods you choose NOT to believe in...why not just one more?
1. God is defined as a perfect being.
2. To be perfect is to lack nothing.
3. No two beings are identical.
4. This means that one must lack something the other possesses.
5. The one that lacked something would not be perfect, and therefore, not be God.
6. Therefore, one can only be God.
@@lovespeaks777Apply this to the trinity and you become a Jew then.
@@lovespeaks777 and where is your source for this before you say that book that can be faked so easily