ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ต.ค. 2023
- Probably one of the best tech demos I’ve seen in a while. It was beautifully made and extremely well presented.
Link to the original vid • Star Engine Tech Demo ...
#squadron42 #squadrongaming #squadron #pcgaming #facecam #pcgamer #pcgames #actiongames #space #spacegames #dreamgames #xqcow #xqc #kai #kaicenat #markiplier #mrbeast #trending #coryxkenshin #reaction - เกม
![fellow fellow - Proud [OFFICIAL MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/9uZF7BlUQPE/mqdefault.jpg)
Just in case to let you know (because a lot of folks, and journalists, lie and misinform about this). You can buy the early access for star citizen for 45usd. 1 time purchase, no mandatory subscriptions, and the rest of the ships (and items) are or will be available to purchase in game. You don't need to spend 1 extra cent to enjoy it. Just he base price.
Exactly, half the price of a AAA title now on the consoles.
Yes thanks for the info ! Did my research on it and it looks legit. But since it’s still in development I’ll wait for the free fly or the full release !
Freefly starts next week friday the 17th @@HiggyRoww
@@HiggyRoww if it means anything, the 45 bucks goes towards the development of the game. They don't have a publisher, so the pledges and ship sales are how they make payroll and hire new people.
@@HiggyRowwtry it for free in a free fly event.
Keep in mind there is free fly events you don’t have to buy it to test it out periodically through its development.
I’ll check it out when the next event is here !! It will be very interesting to see
@@HiggyRoww- should be around Nov 18 the, that's the International Aerospace Expo week. So, besides whichever ships they grant access to for the free fly, all the ships will be on display in the expo hall.
@@HiggyRoww next event is this month for 2 weeks starting on the 18th of november , btw , up until the jump to the second system, everything is in game . Right now , even the gas giant
@@Texas240You can rent everything you see at the expo hall for free. Just click on the ship and choose rent.
Keep in mind that Star Citizen is a live service game, and that HOPEFULLY will never be done. The Star Engine marketing video here demonstrates how the graphics have improved over the original alpha release almost 10 years ago. They'll be able to keep scaling it up as features are implemented, so it'll never look dated. The big buzz of course is that they're now in the final stretch for completion of SQ42, and the UI and navigation is getting finalized and moved over to Star Citizen. That phase will be the time, I suppose, the general gaming audience would think of the game being "out". Just keep in mind that it probably won't be complete until they shut down in a couple decades, so it's silly to wait beyond 2024 to join the Verse. The rollout on final polish in the next year is already looking nuts, since they only showed us the content coming through the 4th quarter.
You mentioned the blood, sweat, and tears...the game has a full actor status system. Your characters don't just have hit points; they need to breathe, are sensitive to pressure, can get hyper or hypothermia, dehydration, etc. And these will affect the character, causing light sensitivity, nosebleeds/ear bleeds, and you can pass out and die from exposure. The game also doesn't have a "magic" inventory system so everything you carry on you needs to be in a pocket, backpack, or otherwise attached to you, so you'll need to store gear and weapons you aren't using on ships and in hangars. Basically, if you plan on going into deep space, bring some food and water and make sure you have any sort of suits you'll need to explore extremely hot or cold environments.
It's not a "hardcore" simulation, so the timers for this stuff are really long and will only come up if you go way outside the beaten path, but if you go outside in a t-shirt and shorts on that first planet you saw (Microtech), you'll freeze to death pretty quickly, and even standard space suits aren't enough (contrary to popular belief, space is not "cold" in the same way a planet is) to protect you for long. They will be expanding this system a bit, but pretty much everything I mentioned, at least in effect, is already in alpha and playable.
Star Citizen is intended to be a space sim, with an emphasis on the "sim" portion. There are no player stats, skill points, perks, or whatever. Everything is based on what equipment you have access to and your own player skill, such as aim, knowledge, and skill with various minigames for different occupations (i.e. mining requires careful throttle control to avoid blowing up the rock). It won't be for everyone, but for those who are looking for this type of thing, there's really nothing else out there like it.
THERE WE GO!
Awesome, that was quick lmao. Glad you were able to check, this will be the future of gaming. Engines like Star Engine will be the kind of tools that will propel gaming out of the technological rut it was stuck in.
Indeed it will. It probably going to be up there with the rage engine and unreal
@@HiggyRowwWell Star Engine has been derived from CryEngine. But now it is so much more. Even CryEngine was way ahead of every competition. And a lot of the CryEngine devs from Frankfurt (Germany) now work for CIG.
@@quecksilber457 You are somewhat right with one minor exception. The entire CryEngine was stripped down to its base element and completely rebuilt from the ground up resulting in becoming an entirely new graphics engine called Star Engine. CIG even hired the actually creator of the original CryEngine which made of this possible.
@@stormfire962imastarcitizen5This is why i said it was derived from it and that it is way more than CryEngine nowadays. I know that. If you read my initial comment again, this is exactly what i wrote in my comment.
Turns out Starfield was Star Citizens best advertisement
yep
Just finished your vod. Love it, hate it, run from it, its all inevitable. Star Citizen > All, Game of the Generation. Once Squadron 42 drops, see you all in the verse!
o7
It’s a very ambitious game and it looks incredibly fun. Hope that you enjoyed the vid !!
“Game of the Life” is such a great phrase hahaha
In order to simulate the universe Star Citizen wants to implement a high level universe simulation that imforms the detailed simulation around the players.
For example: A player and his environment (maybe a city district) ist simulated with npcs. The player is able to interact with those npcs and do mission stuff. Everything outside outside the city district or his field of vision is streamed out and neither simulated on the local pc nor the server. Instead the inhabitants are statistically simulated on a high level, with some named npcs also being tracked in the general area instead of their exact location. This allows the game to simulate millions of inhabitants since they do not updated multiple times per second but maybe once per minute.
Currently there is not such high level simulation in the game, so whenever a city is streamed into the server it is pre-initialized with ncps spawning at their assigned location and then going about their routines until they are streamed out (when no player is around anymore).
However we do have persistence now, which means that any entity / item in the world has a position and is saved in a database. So when a player leaves an area and the server streams out data that data is saved in the persistence database. When a player enters the area again it is initialized with all the previously saved items in their previous location.
Are you speculating or it this something their going to add in the future?
@@SonGoku-hi8ow This is the concrete plan all along since 2012. Some of the features have been shown in prototypes and some of the background serivces facilitating this are allready in game.
Whats allready in:
- When a region is void of players it is streamed out from the server and the local pc to save ressources. That region is now effectively inexistant... but
- Persistent Entity Streaming allows for all Game Objects to be streamed out into a database and streamed in again when players enter a region. That means while a region is not simulated it does retain its former state once the simulation starts again.
- Global Economy - Buying, Selling and Stocks are handled by a global service in the background and are not strictly bound to any one Game Server. Since each individual Server has a small population at any time this often leads to confusion as buying on one Game Server might lead to shortages on all the others. But this is only a small part of the intended universe Simulation.
Whats coming:
- Quantum is what CIG calls their universe Simulation that will drive NPCs, Mission Generation and the Economy. It is an overarking simulation that does not simulate phyisics, collisions and gunfights at multiple frames per second but maybe a few per minute. It simulates archetypes of NPCs that make up buyers, sellers and workers that make up the global economy. Its not really about simulating trillions of NPCs but only a statistically significant amount in the background. Encounters in a certain Regions (Missions) are generated based on this simulation.
- Named NPCs should also be part of the Quantum Simulation. Those are NPCs created or used by Players on their ships or important Quest Givers and Mission Targets. The location and abilities / stats of those NPCs have to be tracked in the background even when they currently not around players and therefor streamed out of game servers.
When players enter a certain region than the NPCs are given physical form on the game server, either by statistically aproximating the types and numbers of NPCs to spawn in a location or by spawning a mission Target or other named NPC in the apropriate location.
@@elfwyn8707 ok I see and do they plan on trying to make the npcs feel lifelike and realistic
@@SonGoku-hi8ow Well... for now they are starting to give NPCs different traits depending on their role and skill levels. But that is very basic behaviour like civillians, thugs or professional soldiers. Those are combat traits that will influence their tactics systhemicly. When you pull you gun in a landing zones you will see Civillians raise their hands or run away while local police will tell you to drop your weapons.
There are also Anmation and Behaviour sets for other professions like Storekeepers, Mechanics and the infamous Bartender.
Those random NPCs behaviours will find their way into NPCs crews someday when mechanics, marines or turret gunners traverse a ship to fullfill their duties.
NPCs are meant to have various stats that will dictate their prowess with certain tasks and their salary.
Currently NPCs don't have much of a history to them. They spawn in a location and just spool off their behaviour at certain points. Once they are part of the simulation and become parts of missions their doing will have more purpose.
That won't make them lifelike but at least more than a random guy standing around in the corner. I doubt that just any NPC will be interactible in the sense that you can innitiate conversations, but at least they should somehow react to their suroundings.
I invested almost 300€ in 2013 in SC, but did not buy any EA game since then. I actually saved a lot of money I could have spent on EA garbage over 10 years. This is my middle finger to the industry, and totally worth it.
Just a smal caveat about Star Citizen.
The tech demo contains features scheduled ot be released throughout 2024, so "currently" no creatures for example.
Also the world is currently relatively empty and waiting to be populated with new locations and mission types in 2024.
It will be a wild ride over the next 2 years.
Just to add on to the above, 'currently no creatures' shouldn't be considered a knock. This video is about the engine, which obviously can support creatures, not the game. And creatures are planned for the game - but they aren't in-game yet.
over recent years I find it more and more hard to consider that mindset. Nowadays AAA games are fully releasing with tons of issues at full price so now I just play what's fun and worry less about being released or polished.
love the video though
I completely understand your way of thinking ! It’s just that I wouldn’t mind holding on to waiting a full release and (hopefully) polished game
And thanks 😎
Another thing, they are making two games. This is the MMO Star Citizen. They you have the single player story Squadron 42 where you are the wingman of Mark Hamill.
Fun fact, the demo opens with the composer showing off the new cloth and hair tech.
Fun fact: The 'conductor' (not "composer") is a a throwback reference to the conductor that opens the credits for Wing Commander1, Chris Roberts' original 1990 space game.
@@simonwaugh5519 That's right, conductor. good catch.
13:14 that planet is supposed to have volcanic activity lore wise which is cool. The entire pyro system also has solar flare events which if you don't do proper things will essentially drop your ship out of the air if you're planet side.
I love that mentality to buy a game when fully released but i have a question. How manu games from big companies actually release in a finished and polished state nowadays? So many companies will say "released " and we often get half baked, buggy, half ass effort games. They immediately sell with DLC and often have more planned, season passes etc.
I miss when a game released and that was it, no dlc, season passes, they had to get it right on release
I agree with you on that. A lot of games today do rely too much on dlc and season passes but I feel like that is also a bit of the consumers fault cause we agree to buy it. I feel like us as gamers just have to stop buying the dlc’s and season passes and show the big companies that we don’t agree.
@@HiggyRoww the power of FOMO is so strong
most AAA get to the alpha stage, polish it to a degree... then release, its very rare a AAA actually fully fleshs out their game and goes the distance, hence each COD game is like the last... often they take more steps back then forwards as well, always trying to cut features from their games and at best sell them back to you post release... which means even if they do, because they never intended to make it a feature complete game from the start... even after 10 years of DLC (if it even lasted that long) you would still not have a feature complete game, if they made it like they did 2 decades ago, were most devs were trying to squeeze as much into their games as possible to maximise sales.... now its the exact opposite... how much can they cut, remove, skip and from whats left, sell back as DLC.
I find the Design of Orison is so fucking Sick.
A floating Cloud City in the other Atmosphere of a Gas Giant is such a Creative Idea.
Can't tell if sarcasm or you never watched Star Wars.. That city was literally inspired by the Cloud city of bespin. It's meant to tug on the emotions of people.
@@luftwaffles274 No I never watched Star Wars. Always hated it. Dont like George Lucases writing Style
@@NightStorm1000 Okay, I don't fault you for not knowing it, Many things ingame or planned to be have some subtle and some not so subtle references to bring people into the verse.
Just join the upcoming Free Fly. Backers are those who got tired of the lack of innovation in gaming. You can buy it when it's more complete, and nothing is wrong with that. This year has been one of the best years for gaming, but the Star Engine demo reminded me of all the things I experienced in the Alpha Persistence Universe (PU). This year was also a major year for CIG, for the single-player is finally feature complete, and the multiplayer tech to move from server to server with no load screen is finally working. We just need to see it at scale.
Late to the party, but if you want to see a little what actual in-game gameplay looks like (albeit a couple years old now so without some of the recent updates), check out War For Jumptown by Bedbanannas. It's a 100% in-game mission that's entirely player vs player and showcases the idea of what the game can be.
A drug-producing facility comes online and the crew in the video goes to try to take it over and steal a bunch of drugs from the facility, but because the drugs are so profitable to steal, tons of other players and large groups are trying to do the same, holding down the facility with air power, tanks, infantry, and surface-to-air missile trucks.
This games is going to be free to try for until the end of this month staring next week, You should give it a try.
Bethesda, please license StarEngine for Starfield II (MMO edition).
I doubt that Cloud Imperium Games will be licensing Star Engine out until after they've released the entire trilogy of Squadron 42 games (part 1 is in final polishing now).
There is a free fly event for Star Citizen right now, until the he end of the month. Only registration needed. You get to loan almost all of the ships for free, and play.
And it's TWO games, Squadron 42(not available to buy atm) the Singleplayer game, and Star Citizen that is the Multiplayer game.
SQ42, is in the polishing phase as you say. So 12-24 months that usually last. So this will be the first game to be done, as you require before a buy.
To get Star Citizen(MP) to be feature complete, that's easily 10 years +.... Because there are hundreds of starships they need to complete, and 100 Solar Systems(with planets, moons, fauna etc) So by your standard, you never buy it xD This will be a live service game.
At the moment the game is in Alpha, about 55 bucks to get permanent get access. But there is 1-2 weeks of free fly, usually four times a year. One day it will be in Beta, and eventually release. And then CIG will continue to add said solar systems, ships, missions, events etc
I know you said that you want to wait until the game comes out but at least 90% of what you see is already playable. Whatever you put into it now you will still have when it comes out.
You don't have to wait! You can fly amongst the stars and join org battles now! it's awesome! See you in the verse o7
3:39
No, not with SC.
They are with SQ42, but they're using SC for this engine demo.
Custom ship building probably won't be a thing in Star Citizen. Because there's PvP, everyone would build a meta ship, like a flying square.
Maybe, but with engineering there would be massive drawbacks when it comes to power management and repairs, and with flight control surfaces, it would be tough to build a meta ship since something that's aerodynamic would have a much larger cross-section than something nimble but far less maneuverable in-atmo.
not much risk of that, ships are designed intentionally to fill certain rolls with distinct pros and cons, so if you know what ship your opponent has you can pick your ship based of that or like wise their fleet, you can basically go rock paper scissors, after they already showed their hand... this was intended to make it so you cant just go @X@ = best ship in the game and everyone just flys said ship and the best pilot always wins.
the way its designed if you have the best option vs the opponents chosen ship or fleet combination, even if they are more skilled pilots, you could win due to your tactical advantage by taking advantage of the cons of their ship(s), this is to make it so again you cant just have a skilled player picking one ship and wiping the floor regardless who shows up and again forcing fleets to basically take huge risks if they try put all the eggs in 1 basket, eg one type of ship focus, forcing fleets to be more akin to realife, different ships compensating for the cons of another... so a hammerhead is a death machine vs fighters... but dead vs a persues and again the persues is dead vs fighter bombers due to limited anti-fighter defense, its designed to take on slower ships around or bigger then it... so in effect the 2 ships compliment each other, this principle works from the snub fighter all the way up to capital class in design and non-combat ships as well + you also have armor which is yet to be properly implemented which will also have a major effect on what ships people pick and for what situation, some ships have less pew pew, but are designed with more armor, so eg some arent so hot right now or work unrealistically as their hp pool is to big or to little, but that changes once armor properly implimented, a fighter gun for example wont be able to penetrate armor beyond a certain level... tactics change again... eg a light fighter will only be able to disable weak points of a larger or heavily armored ship and need to depend on more heavy hitters to actually destroy it... if no plans to boarding it are involved... so a fighter swarm wont be a effective way or destroying a cap ship, only disabling its more fragile exterior components... once the shield is down, you will need bombers and larger ships with big guns and they will need fighters and anti-fighter ships to protect them etc etc... so again even if someone owns a hammerhead or polaris or idris etc... they wont be some king bee flying around, but vs the right target they will be.
there is a degree of customization already with ship modules, so weapons, shields, power plant, coolers etc some ships are already designed in mind to have much larger module switching unique to that ship that change the entire function of the ship, so want a dedicated cargo bay, then you put in the cargo module, want a dedicated exploration model, put in the exploration module and it effects the function of the ship some more then others, were default modules can be switched out like wise to better suit your intent, eg civ, military and industrial modules have a diferent focus in pros and cons... eg industrial can absorb more EM damage since they probably want to flee not fight, but the choice is yours and some ships intended for freight can also provide some pew pew, that will be effective vs some ships or give them some more staying power if being ambushed were they cant flee, but have escorts or deter single seat fighters from harassing them as they have to low dps going forward.
etc etc... either way what this means is even if you know the ship... you wont necessarily know what modules it has equipped when you encounter it or the skill of the pilot /crew or if its turrets have gunners or not etc... or like again with a multi crew how many spare parts it may have as well to replace damaged parts on the fly, so if you go into combat blind thinking you got the edge... it might not actually go as planned, this also includes the factor espionage and sabotage is a intended feature going forward as well... making sure you dont have spies in your org... or saboteurs on your ship will be important, as give them to much clearance, they can per say shut down your engines and shields in the middle of a fight or open the cargo bays to allow a boarding party on board etc.
food for thought.
@@JINGWA64 - That's a long reply for what you're basically saying, which is, "I agree with your explanation of why SC won't have player created ships."
Also. Fact Check. In the actual game, you're unlikely to know what ship your opponent will be flying or how equipped. With players, there will be certain meta things that can be expected. Although some players will do odd, but effective things, and ai will be a total crap shoot.
Currently, with ai missions, you can learn what to expect. That's not final design.
For a daily driver, a generalist ship will be the best option because you can't know what you will come up against. Sure, there is some element of rock, paper, scissors (where a ship is good against some bad against others) but this is all related to a 1v1 and with non multi crew ships. Add in groups and multi crew and paper, rock, scissors becomes much muddier.
Regardless, as you said and as I said to the other guy, SC ships are designed by the devs to do a certain thing, fit a certain role or niche, and have certain pros and cons.
Considering CIG takes 6 months to several years to build a ship, it's very unlikely they'll open up custom ship building to players.
CitCon (can't remember which one) they showcased Engineering and the guy said something like crafting will be possible, but not in the sense of creating something new. The possibility to make your own components and rebuild ships to your liking. Which would greatly enhance professions such as Racing, Combat, Salvage, Mining, etc.
So to speak Racing teams can fully mod out the hell of a single fighter or other small ship and give it tuned up specs within the confines of an existing vessel.
play the game for free during IAE week starting the 19th of November rent all ships in the show for 48 hrs free
Buddies keep asking me when they should pull the trigger on Star Citizen after watching a few of my streams. I'll tell you the same thing I tell them. When you get your hands on Squadron 42 and beat it, then come over to Star Citizen. By then it should be ready for you. Unless your tolerance is high for bugs I would avoid it for now. They are so damn close to greatness though. Just a couple more fundamental tech pillars to fold in and this game will be what your imagination hopes it is.
ik ben echt gek op deze game ik zag die in 2012 toen ik op TH-cam za ik was verkocht en ik heb ook geduld tot het klaar is als je weet wat ze gaan doen je gaat zeker kopen
Je kan het beter nu kopen en wachten tot het klaar is. Als je wacht tot het helemaal af is, is het spel misschien 2 of 3 keer zo duur. De prijs is al van 25 naar 45 euro gegaan, dus het zal me niks verbazen als het uiteindelijk 100 euro of meer gaat kosten.
ther won t be ship building, you can still change weapon and internal component. let player build what they want would be a mess to balance, and the ship damage and other systeme would be a pain to code too
They actually did give a passing mention to being able to create ships eventually in the base-building panel at CitizenCon. I doubt that we'll be able to come up with completely new designs though.
@@randlebrowne2048 i didn t saw that, you mean like a small factory or assembly line to make a small ship ( like you order part of a gladius and build it at your base?)
@@kaollachan They didn't really go into specific details; but, it was part of a conversation where they were saying that *everything* in the game will eventually have blueprint recipes (including ship components and furniture). I'd assume that you'd have a blueprint for a ship fuselage and separate ones for each component though.
@@randlebrowne2048 CIG ( if they haven t changed on that) always said player could control of a manufacture point ( like you control a station) but not own it, and no passiv money making, still could be a nice way to trasnport a ship in different part to rebuilt ( like part of a bigger ship that couldn t use a smaller jump point?) anyway, let wait for when and if they talk about it and succed into making it work
Hey next week you can try the game for free at the frozen planet. Rent any ship at the ship convention IAE for free. With a ship, or getting a ride you can go to the other moons, planets and location. The servers will be super loaded... but it is a nice event. You just have to register. Try before you buy for no money
Well, my perspective is that, it's gonna be released eventually, and when it does, It will be 70 bucks. why not get it now for 45 and just deal with the bugs while they work towards their vision for the game.
You should pause the video, if you want to talk a little bit more. You miss too much otherwise. If the video is half an hour or more, so be it. Oh and the video itself is stuttering, not the game itself. You can play it already and there is no stuttering for me.
U know what.....normally someone does research before just making a commentary or opinion.
And to avoid the ads....
Download the video and thus your stream isnt interrupted.
if you get the game id love to fly with you. there should be a free fly in a week or 2.
10:43 I would say everything you've see to this point... 95% of that is currently in game and from this point maybe 30% of that is in game.
There is a free fly on the 17th nov im sure you're aware but i would ask 2 things.
1) if you try SC during the free fly, optimise your PC. SC will run not so great if you dont. Fast ram, page file, bumping the graphic card settings for the program, giving it above normal priority. All of these things can be found online. You can try playing without them but i warn you, you will be coming back to optimise.
2)if you do play SC, come back and make another vid for your thoughts/reactions.
the game is only $45 USD but when it's done it will be $60 at least. just sayin. playable now and you will never have to buy it again or DLC. once and done.
about not buying a game when its not finished.
was ANY game in the last few years ever released finished?
for me Starcitizen is more finished then Starfield.
not to mention Starcitizen cost like half of a AAA game.
Going to have to disagree about starfield. The game may have not have a lot of stuff included but it technically released as it was envisioned by Bethesda with not so much bugs. And I do agree that not many games has released with no bugs but a lot has released in great condition like RE4 remake,dead island 2,final fantasy 16 ,lies of P and surprisingly AC mirage. Again like I said in my video don’t take it as an attack or criticism it’s just the way I think. I’ll be playing the game when it’s officially released and complete !!
Yes, most games in the last few years were released finished.
Just because a few of the most hyped titles flopped doesn't mean the entire industry has degraded.
funny how you're willing to buy starfield that's way less playable and costs more than this game
Gamepass.
Patients is one thing seeing is believing. Starfield is already out now they're playing catch up. We shall see said the blind man.
Starfield is a arcade, singleplayer game. The Star Citizen, which is a using the Star Engine, is a multiplayer MMO. There's a big difference between the two!
I never understand why people feel that if you play 1 game, you can't play another. Chris Roberts himself even advertised another space game that had a crowd funding start (Infinity: Battlescape).
Since that game is already released, I suppose Star Citizen is also playing catch up, by your logic, despite doing something different.
As the other guy pointed out, starfield is doing something different than Star Citizen. If anything, Bethesda bringing interest to the Space or Sci Fi genre is a benefit.
Besides, as far as the software tech underpinning the games, Starfield is playing catch up. But, again, doing something different, it doesn't matter.
you can play SC now, so its already believed... SF was released into CIG's dust trail that had already been lingering there for years... i played SF and ive played SC... SF wouldnt have even scored well back in 2005, so being released in 2023 and as a SP game which doesnt have to worry about all the MMO engine constraints or low budget and manpower CIG had to deal with... SF is = bad... i gave SF a 3.5 out of 10, because it certainly doesnt get better after the first 30 hours...
its best feature is fast travel, so you can skip loading screens and playing the game, likewise its second best feature is the shipbuilder, why? so you dont have to play the rest of the game... now everyone knows why sponsored reviews focused on these 2 points like good things and why in steam reviews, 90% of positive reviews dont clock min hours to reach even midway into the game... most dont clock any additional hours over a month latter, instead they are playing something else and yea 90% of said reviews never even reach the hours needed to show they genuinely like the game and want to play it... again almost all positive reviewers... refuse to complete the game, that in itself tells you their positive review... is actually a negative review based of their behavior... so far steam goes the real review score is a overwhelming negative one based of actual player activity.
and the vast majority that actually put in the hours to show they complete the game and continue to play the game = those who are using mods, since obviously the core experience... kind of sucks, but atleast they can say their positive review was legit... unlike the other 90%.
the problem with the blind man... is they tend to remain blind as its an permanent disability, so im not optimistic about you being able to see, because if you could, it would have been fixed already.
No need for the facemask... too cringe