Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical H69429931 - Is it the Best Mechanical Field Watch?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ก.ย. 2024
  • Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical H69429931 Watch Review on the JustBlueFish TH-cam channel, home of high quality wristwatch and horology related reviews and videos.
    Check out the Hamilton Watch Group on Facebook:
    / hamiltonowners
    5 Ways You Can Help JustBlueFish
    Direct Donation:
    www.paypal.me/...
    Become a Patreon:
    / justbluefish
    Shop on Amazon (my affiliate link):
    amzn.to/2rIzw9K
    Provide Watches for Review (contact me):
    justbluefish@gmail.com
    My Social Media Accounts:
    / justbluefish
    / justbluefish007
    / justbluefish
    #####################################
    On review we are looking at the new Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical reference number H69429931. This is a newly designed field watch in the Hamilton Khaki Field line that pulls design inspiration from the watches produced by the Hamilton watch company from decades past.
    #####################################
    Video Production Information
    Sony HDR CX440 and Canon T5i Cameras:
    amzn.to/2iQpmhm
    amzn.to/2Fj5Rhy
    Camera Tripod:
    amzn.to/2iQvSET
    Studio Lighting Package:
    amzn.to/2iQmQYi
    Audio Recording Lav Microphone:
    amzn.to/2jF9aUb
  • บันเทิง

ความคิดเห็น • 334

  • @algorithm007ify
    @algorithm007ify 5 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    I love the faux patina on this model.

  • @geeman4425
    @geeman4425 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I just bought one for $400 Cdn used but pretty much brand new. Very nice keeps very good time. I like it alot.

  • @malikknows3510
    @malikknows3510 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice video. Question: Could that "faux" patina really be a desert tan coloration? Desert tan is a popular color for military related equipment (backpacks, boots, etc.), likely because of the recent conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I wouldn’t fault you for looking at it that way, but no I think it’s clearly supposed to make it appear aged/vintage. It doesn’t present too obnoxiously on this watch, but I’d still prefer it to just be white.

    • @malikknows3510
      @malikknows3510 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You're probably correct. Given the popularity of that desert tan/coyote color with military veterans and others interested in military aesthetics, and given that only watch nerds like us know what patina is or what it looks like, I think Hamilton may be trying to design watches to attract folks who may not know anything about watches but know what they like. I'm old enough to have seen olive drab rival khaki brown as a color denoting military styled objects. Seems to me that may be going on here. Oh, and this brownish color does serve to denote a field/infantry watch as opposed to an aviation watch.

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The Hamilton website describes the watch with the following caveat - with "old radium" style superluminova hands. So it's made to look like aged creamy orange radium luminous paint. That said, it could have the added benefit that you're talking about, for non-watch people who will look at it in the light of a military themed coloration as well.

  • @tomasinacovell4293
    @tomasinacovell4293 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wow, if they're replaced the previous hand-wind only with this version they've totally burned it to the ground, SAD! ):

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks for watching.

    • @tomasinacovell4293
      @tomasinacovell4293 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JustBlueFish : I was just looking at this again and I'm so curious, and as I'm an amateur watchmaker (COA and Restoration, Mods etc) I wish you had popped it open an took a lookysee inside.

  • @903lew
    @903lew 6 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    You know, I quite like the manual version. No date, no polish, very slim. Will have to pick one up! Great video as always.

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Thanks for watching and enjoy the Hamilton if you end up getting one.

    • @MrJerry160
      @MrJerry160 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I guess dates are too complicated for you

    • @903lew
      @903lew 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MrJerry160 You must be lovely to speak with at parties.

    • @MrJerry160
      @MrJerry160 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@903lew it was a joke about not having a date complication. How has your Hamilton been holding up? If you did end up getting one

    • @903lew
      @903lew 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MrJerry160 I'm on my second one. First version with the 2801 was nice but I sold it after about a year. Picked up a new one with the H-50 and I'm keeping it. The 80h PR makes it a perfekt watch in my rotation and TBH I can't really see the difference i Hz on a second hand that short. If anything, the 21600 bph goes better with the overall retro styling. The retro logo on the crown is also a subjective plus.

  • @hogandori
    @hogandori 6 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    I own one as well. Fortunately, the movement in mine is working flawlessly. The faux patina is barely noticeable. The Nato strap looks great and fits my small wrist almost perfectly. Not a bad purchase if you are drawn to military watches.

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks for watching and enjoy it!

  • @giangvu7902
    @giangvu7902 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I think the crown is perfect for this watch since it makes winding the watch much easier

  • @yannlepantrec
    @yannlepantrec 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I bought the white dial variant from an AD, and was keeping poor time. I bought a timegrapher in the meantime and checked it. It was all over the place like yours and sent it to the swatch group. They replaced the movement and got it back within a couple of weeks. The new movement works great.

  • @mostlysunny4u
    @mostlysunny4u 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I love watching your videos. They are long thorough and feels like you are having a conversation. I have seen your other video where you mentioned that you got a feedback about having long videos; you can count this as a counter. Your format is flawless and different, love it. I usually fall asleep at night or drive in the mornings and evenings with you videos. Keep going.

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Thank you I appreciate that. I get a lot of complaints about my videos being too long, boring, rambling, and so on. So it's always good to hear some positive feedback from people.

    • @abcdefg8134
      @abcdefg8134 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      As long as you don't fall asleep watching them while your driving!

    • @nimmichagger165
      @nimmichagger165 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      That’s a real watch guy, right there!

    • @mostlysunny4u
      @mostlysunny4u 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@abcdefg8134 😂

    • @mostlysunny4u
      @mostlysunny4u 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nimmichagger165 thanks man! I learnt a lot watching these vidoes and I love watches. 😎

  • @davidcallan7844
    @davidcallan7844 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    You may want to check out the MKII Hawkinge, very similar specs. A bit more expensive but all watches are personally QC’d by watchmaker Bill Yao. Just a thought.

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks for the suggestion I'll look it up.

  • @antg.3846
    @antg.3846 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I purchased one at Walmart and I love it! Great review. 👍

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  6 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Really, Walmart carries Hamilton watches? How was the price there?

  • @rockimaru
    @rockimaru 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I like the no date, really simplifies and doesn't interrupt the flow of the dial. but I found myself missing the date window more than appearances. In a perfect world where I can always remember the date, yes, I go with no date. 😁

  • @josepmariaaguascaribot9239
    @josepmariaaguascaribot9239 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    The epitome of field watch reviewed in deep view.

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Thanks I appreciate that.

  • @astronomyvideosbyjimkerr7741
    @astronomyvideosbyjimkerr7741 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I own several of the Hamilton Khaki manual wind watches and they are awesome. Sure one can nitpick some of the features but if your looking for a great military watch go with Hamilton.

  • @Redbirdsfan1970
    @Redbirdsfan1970 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Meant to tell you that it was a very nice touch when you had the watches side by side thst they were running the exact same time. Well done. Thst is never seen in TH-cam videos.

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I always try to do that when working with watches side by side. I feel like when the time isn't sync'd up that it's a distraction that might make the viewer focus on something other than the points we're talking about.

  • @johnklonaris9136
    @johnklonaris9136 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Excellent review.I hope you sort out the issues with the Hamilton.

  • @josemariaguerra3047
    @josemariaguerra3047 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Congratulations, very honest review

  • @munja2111
    @munja2111 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    what a beautifull watch

  • @IsraelGonzalezR
    @IsraelGonzalezR 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What's the difference between this and the H69439931

    • @Treetopflyer777
      @Treetopflyer777 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think (and could be wrong) they reduced the beat frequency in an effort to increase the power reserve.
      But not 100% sure…

  • @therichardchannel
    @therichardchannel 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    the lack of AR on Hamilton crystals is really baffling. It's the reason I'm gonna sell my Khaki King. In places where there's uneven overhead lighting the watch is pretty much illegible because of the glare. And for some reason it's much more reflective than Seiko sapphire crystals that also don't have AR like on the alpinist or Sarb033/035 in comparison.

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah I don't know why they don't throw an AR coating on the underside of the crystal, it would make their already great watches top notch.

    • @flow2tech
      @flow2tech 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      therichardchannel There was no AR on these original military pieces anyways so I'm cool with it on this style of watch.

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's funny actually, for a military watch you'd think AR coating would be a necessity. The glint off the crystal could give away your position, AR might help with that.

    • @flow2tech
      @flow2tech 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      JustBlueFish Watch Reviews Ya one would think eh... I guess Hammy is notorious for no ar.. Guess I can't really complain at that price point but would be nice if they stepped their game up. It's funny, a few of my $300 micros have some of the best ar I've seen.. My marinemaster 300 doesn't even have the greatest either given its price point.

    • @Cutekid69
      @Cutekid69 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Rolexes don’t have AR coating either. They only have AR coating on their date magnifier window

  • @adbraham
    @adbraham 6 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    Bothers me that some of their pilots watches have a screw down crown yet their FIELD watches, designed to be go-anywhere, do-anything watches, don't!. I know you could argue that 50m is probably sufficient, but 50M is NOT designed for swimming, which is the sort of thing one could reasonably expect a 'military' field watch to be exposed to! Major flaw IMO, I would buy one if they did . . . so won't be buying one anytime soon, not when so other manufactures address this issue!

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  6 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      On a mechanical watch I'm not sure you could have a screw down crown. Once the watch is full wound up you can not advance the crown forward anymore, so you couldn't screw the crown in, unless perhaps it was reverse threaded and you screwed it down by spinning it in the backwards direction. A screw down crown isn't necessarily needed for water resistance anyway, it mostly just ensures that the crown doesn't inadvertently get pulled out while it's submerged, with the exception of watches like Rolex with their double and triple lock crowns that have extra seals. That said 50m is definitely on the very low end of what I'd deem as acceptable for a tool watch, 100m would be much better.

    • @adbraham
      @adbraham 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Screw down crowns are quite widespread on mechanical watches; although if you mean on MANUAL mechanical watches, as this is, you are quite right, although I understand Hamilton also make quartz field watches which also feature a non-screw down crown, and automatic field watches ditto. The additional level of resistance afforded by a well designed screw down crown is in my view worthwhile since 50M isn't really designed for full submersion, which in my view any watch termed a FIELD watch should be capable of. In addition, 'depth' rating only really applies to a watch with new and intact seals; in the real world it's wise to exceed the requirements by a margin to account for worn seals, just to be on the safe side; yes, folk should have their watches serviced regularly to ensure, inter alia, water resistance is maintained, but all too often they don't! I for one would rather be on the safe side. Are screw-down crowns necessarily more water resistant per se, not always, it's dependant on design (as you state), and sometimes it's just a sales gimmick, but having said that they are usually associated with greater levels of water resistance. This is still a nice watch, and for many the depth rating would bot be an issue of course, but I think there are comparably priced, but ergonomically better options out there. If I suggest some, perhaps you could review them? ;) Anyway, thanks for the interesting review!

    • @mikefusco7215
      @mikefusco7215 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I would just say, having the field khaki mechanical manual wind, if you sneeze on it, it is susceptible to moisture. I would not wear it swimming. I don't even splash it when I wash my hands. I had to return mine under warranty for moisture for a full service. When it was returned, I notice the crown stem feels much more tight, like the new stem o-ring is nice and snug. I've heard of similar complaints regarding moisture. Screw down crown would be nice, but it is not good for a manual wind only watch. The crown threads will end up stripping over time. Just my opinion based on experience with a very similar Hamilton.

    • @0xss
      @0xss 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You can have manual winding and a screw down crown, the panerai Pam610 has it. But it might add extra cost to the production of the watch,so hamilton might have chosen to skip it.

    • @adbraham
      @adbraham 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Quite agree; early manual-wind submariners had screw-down crowns, so it is possible to do screw-down WITH a manual movement; most designs de-couple from the 'key-less work' part of the movement when pushed in

  • @dustinr16
    @dustinr16 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Where did you buy your timegrapher from? You have me paranoid about all my autos now.

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Got it on Amazon - amzn.to/2TmF5vN

  • @rosomak8244
    @rosomak8244 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Your watch is likely just magnetized.

  • @WorthAWatchReviews
    @WorthAWatchReviews 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great review, I love my white dial varient☺️👊

  • @xamuth
    @xamuth 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Will be a versus this hamilton hack vs Seiko snk809 or snzg15/13?

  • @svelinov
    @svelinov 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    One of the best if not best review on YT on Hamilton Khaki Mechanical

  • @altezahen_N
    @altezahen_N 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Love the Norman Rockwell picture in the background 👍

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks, it was a Christmas present. I like it as well.

  • @scuba5k
    @scuba5k 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    No screwed down crown 🤦🏼‍♂️. The only reason why I’ve been delaying. Has anyone took a bath or jumped into a pool with this watch?

  • @DennisBible
    @DennisBible 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Is the new H50 movement *better* than the ETA they were using?

  • @rabtrekker
    @rabtrekker 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am seriously considering swapping my HKF auto for the mechanical version for the simplicity and vintage feel. The brushed / blasted finish will complement my Black Bay 54 better than the polished accents of the auto.

  • @garretthu2466
    @garretthu2466 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I called Hamilton and replacement straps are not in stock yet but they ball parked $80

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      haha, worse than I thought. What did I say, probably $50 to replace it was my guess?

  • @waktosha7378
    @waktosha7378 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I rather have the straight handwinding. I really like my date though. I use my date multiple times every day. I even like the day date feature even better.

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The Hamilton Khaki King with day date sounds like what you need!

    • @waktosha7378
      @waktosha7378 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      JustBlueFish Watch Reviews Yeah, but the eta 2824 has a weak winding mechanism! They break way too easily.

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I've heard that's the case, but I've never actually witnessed it. I often wonder if it's more of an internet myth than fact. I honestly don't know though.

  • @maxcontax
    @maxcontax หลายเดือนก่อน

    Going to agree with you, I have the automatic Khaki with the red second hand, keeps very good time, easy to check the time at a glance. If I need to dress it up I switch straps to the metal bracelet it came with, otherwise a black leather every day. Where I live it was $650 Cdn.

  • @milesf4626
    @milesf4626 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks for the balanced review. I enjoy watching your videos.I’m going to grab one of these as a daily. I like the bead blasted finish, looks like it would take a few knocks. I also like the drilled lugs.
    Keep up the good work sir...

  • @gearbox3773
    @gearbox3773 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hallo what do You think about Hamilton h64455533 with ETA 2824-2 day/date automatic?

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I like it, I've reviewed the Khaki King in the past. Check out that video.

  • @weaselidt6580
    @weaselidt6580 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Your timergrapher could be getting those results from an echo due to the back plate?

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Someone else suggested that theory. I returned that watch but just recently I got a new one, and it's keeping great time on the timegrapher so I don't think that was the issue. I think the movement was just broke on that old watch.

  • @charlesmorantz5696
    @charlesmorantz5696 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I'm a big fan of Hamilton watches and field watches. Thank you for this video!

  • @Warryn-qj5pi
    @Warryn-qj5pi 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Tough and accurate watch . Got it on the leather nato
    Soft and comfortable on the wrist. My first Hammy. Murph is Next.

  • @mrbud8524
    @mrbud8524 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I own Rolex submariner & a panerai pam 005, Monaco calibre of 11 blue! I started buying afew Hamilton watches l think there great watches with great history for your hard earning money must buy there getting very popular! Hamilton is Hollywood!

  • @TypeSly
    @TypeSly 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've never understood why these are so popular. Ridiculously long lugs, with crappy AR coating and horrible lume. Not to mention the most boring dial and an ugly dull finishing on the case. 🤢🤮

  • @Adam_Newman
    @Adam_Newman 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Good review, I have this watch with the H50 movement & haven’t had any issues, great watch

    • @juniorjohnson5961
      @juniorjohnson5961 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I've just ordered one with the H50 movment how's yours running now ?

    • @Adam_Newman
      @Adam_Newman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@juniorjohnson5961 it’s working great, no issues at all

  • @steven3379
    @steven3379 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I agree nice watch, I like the automatic better also!

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Something about it, it connects with me more. I like the Mechanical as well I think it's really cool, but if push came to shove I'd pick the Auto.

  • @mifi5913
    @mifi5913 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Casios are good value.

  • @garretthu2466
    @garretthu2466 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Moral of the story, buy authorized at any price point. You are supporting a legitimate supply chain and you get the relationship and the peace of mind of a warranty which by law (California) the AD has a responsibility to send it in for service for you under warranty. They will tell you it’s faster for you to send it in but if you can wait they must send it in for you. I once had to send in a JLC Master Control and it was covered under warranty, if it was grey market it would be serviced by some lowest bidder watchmaker, you don’t want them using a generic case back opener on a watch like that as it will leave scratches.

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for watching Garrett, and for the comments. I agree and prefer to buy from AD's when the price makes sense. Some watches are so deeply discounted from Grey Market sellers that even if you had to send it in to the manufacturer for a full service at your own cost, it would still be cheaper than buying from an AD.

    • @garretthu2466
      @garretthu2466 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      JustBlueFish Watch Reviews For certain brands I agree, but service costs now for even Hamilton’s are over $200 and over $600 for JLCs.

  • @davidmendoza3822
    @davidmendoza3822 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Thank you for this review! This is the most in-depth look at this watch that I've found so far. Would you happen to know if the case dimensions are the same between the Mechanical and the Automatic? Particularly the lug-to-lug... also I'd guess the Mechanical is thinner. This one doesn't seem to be available in my country yet but I could try the Automatic and get an idea as to how the Mechanical would look and fit. Thank you once again!

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Other than the case thickness I think all the dimensions are the same, right around 47mm on the lug to lug measurement on both watches.

  • @gst69man
    @gst69man 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Needs to break in.

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Watches having to break in is largely a myth in my opinion and experience.

  • @Cwardun
    @Cwardun 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wonder if the older mechanical bracelet will fit the new watch? The cases look identical.

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I don't know for sure but hopefully someone else that has tried it can chime in.

  • @mrbacchus6127
    @mrbacchus6127 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Well I thought it might be neat to have a timegrapher, but now I see it could save me money also.

  • @misternobody4644
    @misternobody4644 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    For anyone considering using the timegrapher shown, do not buy it. I had the exact same timegrapher, got it checked for accuracy with a professional. Professional said it was junk and showed me pictures of the cheap soldering job inside the timegrapher. He checked it for accuracy against an accurate reference, they did not match up. Do NOT buy/use this timegrapher; it's a waste of money. It's probably the reason he got wonky results on his timegrapher. Also, if you buy this watch from Jomashop, Jomashop covers your watch if it's too fast or slow, they will regulate it for you under their warranty that lasts up to 5 years.

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      You do you see the flaw in your logic right? You've tested exactly 1 sample of the product you're claiming doesn't work. Perhaps you just got a lemon, it happens. I've compared mine to a multi-thousand dollar Witschi timegrapher at my rolex AD and they were within a second of one another. You can also find plenty of positive of feedback on this product online.

  • @cagle82
    @cagle82 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Mine just stopped working after less than 6 months. I bought it brand new from Hamilton's own website and it took more than 2 months to get it back. Now I have zero faith in the watch or Hamilton. Hugely disappointing.

    • @juniorjohnson5961
      @juniorjohnson5961 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I just ordered one surfing the web for reviews , now I see people having trouble with the movement did you ever get it sorted out ?

    • @cagle82
      @cagle82 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@juniorjohnson5961
      Since I got it back from Hamilton it’s been working properly.

  • @MSH3423
    @MSH3423 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    damn
    watch is $500....
    but grapher is like $200

  • @joshualepla6891
    @joshualepla6891 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi I have recently purchased a Hamilton Khaki Field mechanical watch with the green NATO strap. I'm am wondering is the movement the ETA or the new H-50? The second hand does not sweep as smooth as I would have thought. It has a slight stuttering action. However, the watch is keeping relatively good time. Is this normal for the second hand to sweep like that?

    • @pedroantunes9011
      @pedroantunes9011 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Joshua Le Pla This ETA has a smooth second hand sweep of 8BPS. Yours is the H-50 with 6BPS.

  • @zHumanfactor
    @zHumanfactor 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Oh, one last question on hand-winding the Khaki mechanical. You mentioned stopping hand-winding when you start to feel the resistance. I was under the impression movements today can't be over-wound, that there is a mechanism that prevents over winding damage.

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Automatic watches allow you to keep winding the crown, without damaging the watch, by letting the mainspring slip in the barrel if it’s at max power. Mechanical watches like this don’t do that, once you feel the crown get snug and stop, don’t keep trying to spin it.

    • @zHumanfactor
      @zHumanfactor 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JustBlueFish Ah, excellent. Thanks for that info. Cheers!

  • @djrar
    @djrar 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    is this watch still alive? mine didn't even last for a year

  • @cainomac
    @cainomac 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hey man, thanks for your video. I just bought one of these, was lucky enough to find it locally because it was sold out everywhere online. I was wondering if you knew what the power reserve was upon a full winding? Thanks!

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      42 hours according to the 2801-2 spec sheet.

    • @cainomac
      @cainomac 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      JustBlueFish Watch Reviews thanks!

  • @ernokirnyan9984
    @ernokirnyan9984 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi, how many winds to have the 80 hour power reserve? Can I overwind the mechanism and damage it? I mean is there a defending system built in which helps against over-winding? Thank you!

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I don't know the exact number of winds, but when you get to full power you can't wind it any further. It will stop. I'm sure if you cranked down on it hard you would break the mainspring but I can't imagine any way that could accidentally happen.

  • @joe32623yr
    @joe32623yr 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The “H” on the crown & case back are different than on the other watches I’ve seen. I wonder if that’s normal.

  • @TIM123451ERR
    @TIM123451ERR 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm not collector but should I buy time grapher?

  • @galenbaby
    @galenbaby 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Yes thanks for posting. First of its kind on an exciting release. On the time grapher... the auto says 21600 and the mechanical says 28800. What’s up with that?

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The Auto uses an H-10 movement, which was a new movement Hamilton started using in the last year or two, based on a modified ETA 2824-2, and the beat rate was slowed down on that new movement.

    • @galenbaby
      @galenbaby 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      JustBlueFish Watch Reviews whoa. I didn’t realize that. I have an old khaki from the 90s and I put up with no AR because I dig the dial and it beats at 28800. Seems like a bummer to modify the 2824 but sacrifice the smoothness

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Part of raising the power reserve up to 80 hours was having to reduce the beat rate. I guess that’s part of the trade off.

  • @Jim00000
    @Jim00000 6 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Excuse my ignorance but how is this worth almost 8 times the cost of the seiko 5?

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      It's perhaps debatable that it is. I think the quality is higher than a Seiko 5, but 8 times better, maybe not. Still an excellent watch and if you like it you got to pay.

    • @fiercekrypton
      @fiercekrypton 6 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Sapphire crystal, Swiss made, and doesn't have a huge ugly seiko 5 shield stuck on the dial(aka better styling).

    • @elv3a424
      @elv3a424 6 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Better styling, more historically accurate (Seiko field watches weren never used AFAIK), Sapphire, hacking & handwinding, accuracy.

    • @MiguelGarcia-vj7oo
      @MiguelGarcia-vj7oo 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Jay Lim why don't you do some actual research and read just like many true horologist....?? Then you would objectively compare and contrast and you'll get your answer...........

    • @Jim00000
      @Jim00000 6 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Miguel Garcia Get off your high horse. I never claimed to be a "true horologist". I just wanted an answer to expand my knowledge. You're the type of person that makes "true horologist" look like the dicks.

  • @garretthu2466
    @garretthu2466 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Called again... wanted to make sure what the price of the strap was, it’s confirmed at $92 plus tax and $10 shipping to CA so over $100 to get one in hand. It’s also back ordered 3-4 weeks. I would probably not use it and get a ADPT NATO for $50

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for the info, good to know.

  • @dragonmaster7841
    @dragonmaster7841 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    For a 38 it looks like it wears very small. On the wrist it looks like a 36 in pictures. Would you agree or disagree? I have a 7.75” wrist and afraid it may wear too small for me.

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think in general Hamilton watches wear a little bigger than their case diameter suggests, because their lug to lug width tends to be a tad larger than similar sized watches. But you could always go with the 40mm Khaki King if you wanted a great Hamilton Field watch in bit larger size.

    • @alfredocastaneda54
      @alfredocastaneda54 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I had the same fear due to my 8.5 inch wrist. I bought one, and it quickly became a favorite. I highly recommend you give it a try.

    • @nimmichagger165
      @nimmichagger165 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I have a 7’ wrist, and it wears more like a 40mm. Give it a try. The lugs make it wear larger than its size suggests.

  • @Basman59
    @Basman59 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Okay having had the old version which one can get on the Grey market for $250 this version does not even come close to justify the price point. Long lugs enable thicker NATOs so that is a plus. Obvious massive drawbacks 5ATM is poor and no AR dreadful end of discussion its the 21st century screw down crown and seal you can double that - poor design. Now the big one is lume...Hamilton least the old version the lume was very poor...n]barely lasted 15 minutes when charged with a 700 lume flashlight for 5 minutes...seriously bad. H Goose Saluda albeit Quartz is better price point. They have missed an opportunity to improve the previous version - not for me.

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The lume on this one is some of the best I've seen from Hamilton, but it's still not as good as Seiko. Regarding the screw down crown, it's a hand wind mechanical watch you can't really do a screw down crown on a hand wind movement.

  • @siennacianciola5589
    @siennacianciola5589 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is the coolest asthetic ever.!
    The auto looks terrible
    If you want a dress watch ., don't buy a field watch ., I can't understand some people.

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This is definitely cool but I wouldn't agree that to auto looks bad. They're distinctly different enough to have different appeals, but both are great.

  • @EgdeFilms
    @EgdeFilms 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So...
    555 Gear is also having issues with his copy. Yikes. I'm going to do a hard pass on this watch.
    I'm sorry to hear all the bad news.

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I have gotten a replacement and it’s been working fine for months. I don’t know what his problems were everything is fine with my new one.

  • @jeeperspeepers8323
    @jeeperspeepers8323 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    An issue with a Rolex? That's the seventh sign of the Apocalypse!! Rolex freaks leaping from windows! Sweet Jesus!

  • @mannykhan7752
    @mannykhan7752 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Theyre called syringe hands

  • @ashrafloskor
    @ashrafloskor 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Even though all hammys are sc but ar is almost non-existent on most of them even on the higher price ranges! this watch seems to take the wearer back to the old days in military uniform. Thanks for the useful review by the way.

  • @clucyswedding7523
    @clucyswedding7523 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Looks like your auto is slower beat at 6 per second than mechanical at 8. That more sweeping hand movement is a plus on the hand wound.

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's correct the Khaki Field auto does run at 21,600 and the mechanical runs at 28,800.

  • @shahorology3275
    @shahorology3275 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very informative video. great work sir.

  • @TheWayofGrace89
    @TheWayofGrace89 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I love, love, love my Khaki Mechanical! I have the one with the black dial and white hands and indices - and date window..

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I haven't seen the Khaki Field Mechanical w/Date version in person but all the Khaki Field watches appeal to me. If money were no object I could see having one of each.

    • @Jarhead64
      @Jarhead64 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I have a Hamilton Khaki field king automatic and a Hamilton field khaki officer mechanical, love them both!! Bought them through jomashop using the affirm payment method. I have a seiko 5 automatic too, great starter watch but I wore it when using a reciprocating saw and it is like 5 minutes too fast per day now, needs repair...oops.
      I am planning on buying this hammy!! Water resistance is mediocre but ehh, Hamilton is life!!

  • @TheBullitt2001
    @TheBullitt2001 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How many rotations of the crown would you say it took to fully wind the watch from dead ?

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      off the top of my head, I think it might be 30-40 but I might not be remembering perfectly.

  • @EgdeFilms
    @EgdeFilms 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    May or may not be the first channel to review this watch but the best channel.

  • @dustyd.9555
    @dustyd.9555 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    great detailed review!

  • @shnam13
    @shnam13 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good work, I am more interested in khaki navy Pioneer. Hope someone can do a detailed review on that

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'd like to review a Navy, but I don't plan on buying one myself so the only way that will come to the channel is if I get one on loan from a viewer or direct from Hamilton. Viewers like yourself should email Hamilton and tell them you'd like to see their watches reviewed on my channel.

  • @algorithm007ify
    @algorithm007ify 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am shocked that you had a Submariner with those stability issues in timing.... AMAZING. What dodgy quality assurance for a "luxury" watch.

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I’ve had 2 Rolex with those issues, out of 4 I’ve owned.

    • @algorithm007ify
      @algorithm007ify 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@JustBlueFish I am sorry to hear that. Perhaps rolex production is really at full capacity... otherwise they would have more luxury to apply effort at QA.

  • @14felps
    @14felps ปีที่แล้ว

    I choose mechanical

  • @cedarcanoe
    @cedarcanoe 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I feel you are someone who is in doubt about many things. At least I get this opinion based on the many plus-minus thoughts and the fact that you are repeating yourself over and over again. I am not saying I don’t like the video, maybe you could keep the review more condense

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      When you make videos and get asked questions in comments over and over about topics you've covered in the video, you tend to get a feel for it and anticipate those question - I repeat important points so that hopefully they will stick and said questions won't need to be asked. I have no doubts, at least about watches, but thanks for watching.

    • @cedarcanoe
      @cedarcanoe 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      JustBlueFish Watch Reviews i understand your point and agree 👍

  • @ХристоМартунковграфЛозенски

    Good. But why bother with the pallet fork if you have the warranty ? If there's a problem that appears in the first or second year after purchase, you can still get your watch fixed or exchanged for free.

  • @cirian75
    @cirian75 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Its probably been kicked in transit somewhere

  • @alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi3723
    @alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi3723 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The very first thing that came to mind when I saw this one was its design, it looks just like the ones worn by US G.I.'s had during WW II and the Vietnam War.
    I really have to say mechanical watches have this design really are my favorite.
    Also the swiss army watch strap really looks good on it!

  • @agorpb5871
    @agorpb5871 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    If your timegrapher does that move it and move the watch. Take the plastic sticker off the back. It was showing only 0.3 beat error.

  • @davidpostlethwaite1510
    @davidpostlethwaite1510 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thanks for your review. this is the only review I've found that actually talks about & demonstrates winding up the watch!

  • @Treetopflyer777
    @Treetopflyer777 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great review. (Sorry a bit late to this party)
    I just ordered one as a daily/ beater. I love the no date, tool styling. It’ll be a compliment to my Rolex, omega, zenith, etc.
    hoping the watch works well however! Lol
    I noticed the 2022 model number is different by one number. I think they may have changed the beat freq but not sure.

  • @Redbirdsfan1970
    @Redbirdsfan1970 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Since you've got a warranty from an AD, why not run the watch for a few weeks and see if the information on the time grapher shows it running normal?

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm not a big believer of a break in period on watches. In my experience with a lot of mechanical and autos I have only seen very slight variations too timekeeping after running a watch in for a month. I wouldn't expect a watch with this big of a problem to improve. That said someone has suggested that it could be caused by an echo in the case, because there is a metal dust shield inside the watch between the movement and the caseback (on the old version of the mechanical, not confirmed this version also has that). Unfortunately I'd have to open the watch and remove the dust shield, and check it on the timegrapher to see if that's the cause, and that would most certainly void my warranty if it was obvious that the case back had been removed.

    • @Redbirdsfan1970
      @Redbirdsfan1970 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      My collection is small and much smaller than yours but I have still seen some improvements in accuracy and repeatability with a few of mine after a couple of weeks of being worn. But after thinking about it that could be from the watch being dormant for a little while in inventory, etc. But given this is a brand new design the time from Switzerland to your wrist is pretty minimal and not potentially a year or more. So, it's likely your watch doesn't need a break in period.

  • @deanwaller8283
    @deanwaller8283 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nope it isn't,long Island watches offer a fully mechanical field watch with sapphire crystal front and back,screw down Creon and 100mts of water resistance for under $200
    The Hamilton is way overpriced.

  • @ELFYHO
    @ELFYHO 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think more make sense if compare side by side with h69419933

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I did a video comparing it to that one too, not long ago.

    • @ELFYHO
      @ELFYHO 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JustBlueFish great, i will go to search for it

  • @Daavi85
    @Daavi85 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I don't understand why every reviewer shows the khaki field auto that you have as the Auto equivalent when in my opinion the Khaki field auto day/date 42mm that I bought in 2018 when released is really the auto equivalent, the look almost identical, the dial is identical to the mechanical except for the obvious day/date, size and all brushed case instead of bead blasted and has a 100m water resistant rating, I love the look and do like the day/date, for me I really wanted the look of the classic mechanical but in a bigger auto and in this watch I found it, for reference it is H70535031, I have multiple straps but it looks perfect on my Olive green NATO, great watch.

  • @blackhole6834
    @blackhole6834 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Its 80 ours power reserve,but i want wind my watch every morning as day rutine. Can you help me how can i do it witouth overwinding? How many times shoud i wind crown every morning

  • @JRRob3wn
    @JRRob3wn 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great watch, but people should be aware that it wears big. Also, the strap is awful. Cheap and had fake leather accents. First thing I did upon purchase was order some replacement straps.

  • @SandStorm913
    @SandStorm913 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is it automatic or use battery?

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hand wind, you have to wind it up every day.

  • @CoolCforlife
    @CoolCforlife 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    NIce.. thanks for showing.. great video :)))

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for watching Chris.

  • @Darkraynemoonshadow
    @Darkraynemoonshadow 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for this great review. I was thinking of buying one untill I saw this. I'm not spending a penny for a good looking junk like this.

  • @abuhamza3681
    @abuhamza3681 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I see people complaining too much on this cheap watch. go for seiko then. have any one actually owning one? bahaha

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for watching!

    • @MiguelGarcia-vj7oo
      @MiguelGarcia-vj7oo 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      서동혁 dude speak fucken English............

    • @abuhamza3681
      @abuhamza3681 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Miguel Garcia what are you? Nacho chip?

  • @fandirahmanhidayat3060
    @fandirahmanhidayat3060 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    sir pls help me to identify the khaki field mechanical with h-50 80 hours power and this one with only 42 hours power reserve?

  • @fabiandee8178
    @fabiandee8178 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    the second hand lollypop is a little large but I think you're overreacting a bit there. Far worse are the extra long lugs.

  • @juniorjohnson5961
    @juniorjohnson5961 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just ordered one on Jomashop $326 delivered , I got the one with the brown dial and khaki strap H50 movment , great review hoping not to have a issue with the movement ⌚

    • @blackhole6834
      @blackhole6834 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Do you have some issues and how you wind IT?

    • @juniorjohnson5961
      @juniorjohnson5961 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@blackhole6834 haven't noticed any issues .

    • @blackhole6834
      @blackhole6834 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@juniorjohnson5961 you wind full or half reserve?

    • @juniorjohnson5961
      @juniorjohnson5961 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@blackhole6834 I wind it full .

    • @blackhole6834
      @blackhole6834 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@juniorjohnson5961 crown stop or just feel resist but you can cintinue winding?

  • @adambrewer6548
    @adambrewer6548 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    How's the lume? I have a Khaki King auto and my only complaint is it's lume, or lack thereof.

  • @sergioromano4901
    @sergioromano4901 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice presentation i just wondering why did you buy it in the first place since you don't seem to be quite happy when compairing with the automatic one beside the problem you got anyway its good to know that in case somebody wants to buy it he may run into some problems

  • @rikoflishas
    @rikoflishas 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    it is a charming watch. I would recommend this as the first automatic! don't make mistakes like so many that get a seiko 5 because it is cheap but after a year the watch doesn't keep time accurately or a piece loosens in the movement. pretty amazing little watch

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I like a lot of Seiko 5's in terms of their style and for the most part they are built pretty well. They are a good value watch. But, as you said, the movements aren't great in terms of time keeping. That has been my experience anyway. I'm not sure I would recommend them for the first time mechanical watch buyer at this point. They make a good watch for the enthusiast looking to add some variety to a growing collection that is affordable however.