Saab Gripen Flight Demonstration - Farnborough Airshow

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.ย. 2024
  • Click to subscribe! bit.ly/subAIRBOYD
    Saab JAS 39 Gripen Flight Demonstration - Trade Wednesday Farnborough Airshow 2016
    The Saab JAS 39 Gripen (English: "griffin") is a light single-engine multirole fighter aircraft manufactured by the Swedish aerospace company Saab. It was designed to replace the Saab 35 Draken and 37 Viggen in the Swedish Air Force (Flygvapnet). The Gripen has a delta wing and canard configuration with relaxed stability design and fly-by-wire flight controls. It is powered by the Volvo RM12, and has a top speed of Mach 2. Later aircraft are modified for NATO interoperability standards and to undertake in-flight refueling.
    AIRBOYD • The most viewed aviation channel on TH-cam
    #AIRBOYD #AvGeek

ความคิดเห็น • 127

  • @parkflyerindonesia
    @parkflyerindonesia 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Nice tight turns and high G maneuvers. Incredible high alpha as well.
    The math shows it has good thrust to weight ratio = 1.4, similar to the single engine popular jet fighter. Enough to have unlimited vertical.
    Love the delta wing config, along with dihedral canards. I think I'm gonna design a score-and-fold Jas-39 rc plane shortly.
    Thanks for sharing the vid 👍

    • @widkin
      @widkin 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Maybe you would like this then :)
      forum.flitetest.com/index.php?threads/foamboard-saab-jas-39-gripen-edf-images-plans-build.8289/

  • @rsupuy
    @rsupuy 8 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Those high g's turns make it an outstanding enemy in a dogfight, it could be a dangerous situation try to have a close combat with it, because a good pilot could put it at anyone's six anytime, at the bullseyes of its cannon or IR homing missiles.

  • @drabantorgreyhound6613
    @drabantorgreyhound6613 8 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    So agile! This plane just looks right and if it looks right, it usually is a good airplane. Amazing performance by the display pilot.

    • @herik4006
      @herik4006 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      came here to see the Su 35 killer...( they said)... but (at least here) im not amazed at all...

    • @wadopotato33
      @wadopotato33 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It does look good, but it is a plane that is built unbalanced on purpose. By shifting the weight aft it becomes more maneuverable. So to the naked eye it looks good, but in reality it is not balanced.

    • @Trrenik0kb
      @Trrenik0kb 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@wadopotato33 yeah, like su30 and most of the recent fighters. But they have fly by wire systems so it is not a big deal.

  • @ichwanefendy6045
    @ichwanefendy6045 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    most valuable, effective and efficient fihgting jet

  • @altonwilliams7117
    @altonwilliams7117 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    That’s one sleek little fighter jet!!!

  • @Dreez76
    @Dreez76 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The fact that countries buys the trainwreck F-35 instead of this jet, makes you question the IQ level of certain defense ministers.

  • @Curasy
    @Curasy 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The display and especially the camera filming was extraordinary

  • @bramcurtis6900
    @bramcurtis6900 5 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Canada should buy the Gripen E. It seems almost purpose built for our needs as an air force. Canada will never EVER be called upon the be a "first strike" force and stealth isn't the issue for us as it is for the U.S. The Gripen is a thoroughly modern fighter and is set to carry any nato weapon and integrate easily electronically within a battlefield. The fact that with Saab"s ties with bombardier (the Bombardier Global 6000 is their base for their reconnisance aircraft) we could actualy build them here is the final icing on the cake. The Gripen E for Canada!

    • @wadopotato33
      @wadopotato33 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Stealth also makes a platform more survivable and you owe it to pilots to choose the most survivable plane that you can. Stealth also makes fifth-generation planes excellent dogfighters because in the end it is still radar that other planes use to lock onto you and fire. That said, for a fourth generation plane the SAAB has a very low radar cross section. They maximized their fourth generation design for sure. The Gripen E is an excellent choice for Canada mainly because Canada doesn't want to spend any money on their military.

    • @tulockthewerewolf9744
      @tulockthewerewolf9744 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      French raf

    • @bramcurtis6900
      @bramcurtis6900 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@tulockthewerewolf9744 way too expensive

    • @timmunroe4873
      @timmunroe4873 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Should buy Russian SU 35, The Saab Although a good interceptor, handles well it is not a air superiority fighter the Su35 has hours of loiter time! Canada has a huge sky and the longer you can keep a jet up the better protection you have!

    • @DetStoraMisstaget
      @DetStoraMisstaget 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@wadopotato33 vi har radar som kan upptäcka både f117 och f35. Dom håller på att utveckla den för Gripen.

  • @dimitri10silva
    @dimitri10silva 8 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Awesome, he are the new aircraft of Brazillian air force.

    • @MrZigzira
      @MrZigzira 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      This one is the JAS 39 Gripen, not the Gripen NG.

  • @doffincodger
    @doffincodger 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    An excellent a/c flown by excellent pilots!

  • @sixstrings666
    @sixstrings666 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Swedish engineering. Can't be beat.

  • @contructionph1019
    @contructionph1019 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice maganda short way lng pwede na mag take offf sa run way

  • @Verndroid
    @Verndroid 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Shit. That baby can turn!!

  • @niki7040
    @niki7040 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    No aircraft takes this in a duel, for sure!

    • @martinrivera4175
      @martinrivera4175 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I want to see in a real dual. Who kills who.

  • @alexchaudhri2405
    @alexchaudhri2405 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What a piolet

  • @titanworld1401
    @titanworld1401 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Comparison between F16 V & Gripen.
    F16 29,000 lbs thrust
    Max weight 19,500 kg
    Vulcan canon 500 rounds
    Ferry range 4,200km
    Mac 2.2 at 55,000 ft
    APG radar, infra optical.
    Gripen E
    Max weight 16,000kg
    Thrust 23,000 lbs
    Mac 2 at 50,000 ft
    Single barrel canon 120 rounds
    Ferry range 3,700 km

    • @snowblind9065
      @snowblind9065 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      add thrust vectoring to this little bird and she would be deadly..

  • @Intense951
    @Intense951 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    good pilot, definitely made the aircraft look good.

    • @martinrivera4175
      @martinrivera4175 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'd rather have an experienced pilot.

  • @jokobodo8222
    @jokobodo8222 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very cute, agile and lethal..awesome.

  • @giovannyvictoria4208
    @giovannyvictoria4208 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    nuevas alas grafeno fabriquen y nuevos motores hipersonicos y misiles hipersonicos

  • @Tomcat5837
    @Tomcat5837 6 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I hope the RCAF get the Gripen to replace the old Hornets.

  • @petternilsson4393
    @petternilsson4393 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Its a hell of plane if you Come near you are dead.

    • @martinrivera9186
      @martinrivera9186 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      If you come close to any plane your Dead. I want to see it in a real actual fight with enemy's fighter Kill or be Killed

  • @martinrivera4175
    @martinrivera4175 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Everybody wants a Gripen. It's big hype now. I want to know if the Gripen can shoot down enemy aircraft in accutal encounter before I buy one. Air shows are just planes showing off.

    • @Tapio86
      @Tapio86 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Do you have the money or permission to buy one?

  • @69sungam
    @69sungam 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    the sound.....its....

  • @gregorypdearth
    @gregorypdearth 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    At 8:00 : aaaaaand ...I'm on your 6.

  • @tonyleoncini8397
    @tonyleoncini8397 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What's the New Brazilian Gripen NG is Better than E ?

    • @MrBlue-dm5li
      @MrBlue-dm5li 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There is no NG only E/D-model. NG was just the project name in the beginning.

  • @piraatcentrum4074
    @piraatcentrum4074 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Amazing gripen , you need god pilot

  • @muratoztutan4308
    @muratoztutan4308 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very attack

    • @subhashkapur4148
      @subhashkapur4148 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Much protect

    • @martinrivera9186
      @martinrivera9186 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I want to see it shoot down moving targets. It gets boring just watching them flying in circles.

  • @FairladyS130
    @FairladyS130 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Those pancake turns, how many G?

    • @skogling
      @skogling 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      9.

  • @giovannyvictoria4208
    @giovannyvictoria4208 ปีที่แล้ว

    gripen vendan 6 aviones financiado a colombia

  • @AnselmSchelmberg
    @AnselmSchelmberg 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    6:09 don't fool a flying dragon...

    • @AnselmSchelmberg
      @AnselmSchelmberg 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      6:00

    • @martinrivera9186
      @martinrivera9186 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Flying dragon, it's a paper tiger until she tasted the blood of enemy's aircraft.

  • @billhughes869
    @billhughes869 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    We still legal? I'm not calling Jeff Sessions.

  • @dorsai
    @dorsai 8 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Newest version would give the US F-35 more than a good run for i's money, plus it's also cheaper.

    • @linusorm
      @linusorm 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      well the F-35 is garbage..so that's not really saying much.

    • @Kru12794
      @Kru12794 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Commissar Dog it's not garbage

    • @linusorm
      @linusorm 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Kael K it's garbage

    • @bowser515
      @bowser515 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      It really isn't, not unless you believe the nonsense and sensationalist headlines regarding it. I like the Gripen a lot, but it is no match for the F-35 even in its latest variant.

    • @JS-ob4oh
      @JS-ob4oh 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well, you're all such TH-cam experts so you must be right. Paper pushing pencil dicks.

  • @varadkhajuria6938
    @varadkhajuria6938 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    very high smoke detectable mufflers

  • @jesusguaicara6758
    @jesusguaicara6758 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ese avión no tiene potencia y no creo que pueda con un su30 o 35

  • @dhtango
    @dhtango 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    gripen is a great plane but, it's a good match with the f18 hornet.

    • @j.m.jonsson8355
      @j.m.jonsson8355 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      the current version, yes, not the new wich is majorly improved as of this year

    • @wadopotato33
      @wadopotato33 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@j.m.jonsson8355 But there is also the Super Hornet, so....

  • @dhtango
    @dhtango 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    impressive flyer. the f35 would never dogfight with it. the gripen would be knocked out of the sky and the pilot would never see the f35 and would never knew what hit him. f35 is not a dog fighter it will knock planes out of the sky from miles away.

    • @j.m.jonsson8355
      @j.m.jonsson8355 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      it has meteor so the f-35 is dead as a duck until they have it

    • @seven0929
      @seven0929 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's assuming if the F35 was able to detect the Gripen with its 0,5 RCS

    • @wadopotato33
      @wadopotato33 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@j.m.jonsson8355 What good does a long range missile do you against a stealth plane, you nimrod? The Meteor has a range of over 100 km, but in reality under perfect conditions it is unlikely to see the F-35 until it is well within 40 km. The stealth of the F-35 makes the meteor practically useless. You only need to pack short range missiles against fifth-generation planes because that is the distance you are going to see them at.

    • @wadopotato33
      @wadopotato33 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@seven0929 O.5 RCS is excellent for a fourth-generation plane, but the RCS of the F-35 is 0.001 Meters squared or 500 times smaller. More than a little advantage. The Gripen has an excellent EW suite that would further reduce the range, but so does the F-35.

    • @larscarlsson5974
      @larscarlsson5974 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Well u have a point but super E JAS have a great radar and it will not be taken down with an longe range robot,cause it have a great defense for that kind of threat!!

  • @FahadAli-ew6yk
    @FahadAli-ew6yk 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Jf 17 thunder is better than saab grifen

    • @HoLeeChit11
      @HoLeeChit11 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      😅😂🤣

    • @Tapio86
      @Tapio86 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well, luckily this is Gripen

    • @kungsverige1886
      @kungsverige1886 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      😆😅

    • @ianclarke7547
      @ianclarke7547 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      lol

    • @FahadAli-ew6yk
      @FahadAli-ew6yk 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ianclarke7547 jf 17 is almost 1/3 price of Gripen maintenance cost is too low as compare to Gripen means Pakistan can have three JF 17 instead of 1 Gripen.

  • @pekkatoivanen5697
    @pekkatoivanen5697 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Poor performance compared to Eurofighter Typhoon and others. Notice that after the slow fly when the afterburner is ignited again, all the good fighter are able to climb vertically up, but not Gripen. In all the shows Gripen makes only a turn left at the same altitude without any climbing. This is due to the very poor thrust-to-weight ratio Gripen has, and therefore should not be bought by serious air forces, and this has been the case.

    • @catarinaandersson4215
      @catarinaandersson4215 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Blah blah blah......

    • @annahl7591
      @annahl7591 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You diss us Swedes just because you Finns see it as your job to do it, because we are neighbors and are better than you on ice hockey ..
      You know you do not really mean what you write, this show was outstanding and you know it. ;)

    • @paulwitham7957
      @paulwitham7957 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ya buy the F35 and you will be asking who on earth ever recommended a fighter that has lost a half dozen in crashes over the last month and can only and they either fell of the end of aircraft carriers or their engine caught of fire trying to catch a Russian bomber. Never mind air show stunts for air braking like the Russian junk. Who cares if you use afterburners for air show demo's it's not important. Super cruise at Mach 1.2 is much more important and the F35 was only able to do that for 5 minutes while the Gripen E can do it for as long as required, like a real class 5 fighter. The F35 is also slow
      with a top speed of 1199 mph. As I recall the Mach 2 Gripen @50,000 ft and 1450 mph @ lower altitudes. So Pekka would you rather have an F35 with an operating cost of $45000. per flight hour of a Gripen with far superior reliability (No Crashes) during at all, ever for the Gripen E and an operating expense load of $4700. per flight hour. Hmmm
      I would think this information blows your afterburners on during an air show, right our of the waster.

    • @Karl-Benny
      @Karl-Benny ปีที่แล้ว

      Is that why it managed to beat it at Red flag 2013

  • @Intense951
    @Intense951 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    good pilot, definitely made the aircraft look good.

    • @yuv06
      @yuv06 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Well the RTAF Gripen beat the Chinese SU27 4:0 last year thaimilitaryandasianregion.wordpress.com/2016/06/09/top-secret-outcome-of-china-and-thailand-first-strike-falcon-joint-military-exercise/

    • @martinrivera4175
      @martinrivera4175 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'd rather have an experienced pilot