Top 15 Countries by Military Spending (1830-2019)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.ย. 2024
  • This video will compare the top 15 countries by military spending over time, from 1830 to 2019. What topic should I do next? A like and subscribe would be greatly appreciated!
    *Note: This the first of two military spending videos I have done on this channel. The data from 1830 to 1914 in this video is incorrect, due to exchange rates miscalculations in the dataset. To see a more updated version of this topic check this out: • Top 10 Countries by Mi...
    **I am the only person doing the animations, coding, and music/video editing, and I do not have a team of editors doing any work for me. On average, a video project takes me about a month to complete, but usually it takes much longer.
    ***My videos are created using a 5 step process:
    The first step is finding the inspiration for an idea. This could come from current events, suggestions from viewers, or interesting data that I self curated.
    The second step is the research. Before creating a topic for a video, research needs to be done to understand the topic in full, and why the numbers are what they are.
    The third step is data collecting. I’ll research through historical texts, articles, and organization websites to create a dataset on the topic.
    The fourth step is to animate the dataset. I use a variety of animation and coding softwares, such as Flourish, Power Bi, Excel 3D, Adobe After effects, Motion, and more.
    The fifth and final step is to export the animation over to Final Cut Pro to cut, edit, and enliven the overall project. I’ll add images, additional information, and after effects to turn what was once a dataset of numbers into a colorful project.

ความคิดเห็น • 4.9K

  • @RankingCharts
    @RankingCharts  4 ปีที่แล้ว +791

    An updated and more accurate version of this video has been uploaded here: th-cam.com/video/UrUp5Rm_Ncw/w-d-xo.html
    Thank you everyone for 10k views on the channel! Your support is greatly appreciated! Military spending was much requested, and it is finally completed. What topic should I do next? Leave a comment, like, and subscribe!
    Edit: 4/25/2021 - Thank you everyone for 100k views on this video!

    • @ryds319
      @ryds319 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Nice video. I subscribed. It is good to use real data, not the figures announced by the countries. However, at some points you seem to differ with this video.
      th-cam.com/video/muGvRYDd-lo/w-d-xo.html

    • @oliverrainer5771
      @oliverrainer5771 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I like how this randomly got recommended to everyone and we more than doubled the views on this in a week

    • @teamcybr8375
      @teamcybr8375 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I think it would be super interesting to see military spending as a percentage of GDP!

    • @legendarybananagamingandfu4986
      @legendarybananagamingandfu4986 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      "10k" yea right
      It's over 500k views

    • @viperbot5311
      @viperbot5311 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Algorithm has CHOSEN YOU!!! Bow down….

  • @DutchMadness77
    @DutchMadness77 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5853

    Every country after fighting a few years: "aight let's stop fighting and let's reduce spending"
    US: "no I don't think I will"

    • @user-ne1tv3hb2k
      @user-ne1tv3hb2k 3 ปีที่แล้ว +303

      It’s because US never stopped fighting

    • @joermnyc
      @joermnyc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +265

      US Defense contractor lobbying US Congress: “I am inevitable.”

    • @adampustos1155
      @adampustos1155 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      @@user-ne1tv3hb2k Are you implying that that's a good thing?

    • @user-ne1tv3hb2k
      @user-ne1tv3hb2k 3 ปีที่แล้ว +231

      @@adampustos1155 of course not. USA is the worlds biggest war monger after ww2

    • @youarenotverysmart
      @youarenotverysmart 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @@user-ne1tv3hb2k *laughs in southern africa*

  • @ssrperseus2452
    @ssrperseus2452 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8465

    Remember kids, when threatened America can raise its military budget upto whatever the heck it needs too.

    • @aaronthebest5519
      @aaronthebest5519 3 ปีที่แล้ว +555

      not forever 😬 America is in crazy amounts of debt

    • @SupbarXD
      @SupbarXD 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1218

      Take away the "when threatened" and you'll have an accurate idea of america.

    • @DVZM.
      @DVZM. 3 ปีที่แล้ว +998

      Remember kids, America can raise its military budget upto whatever the heck it needs too, but if you get cancer and dont have superrich parents, or become homeless your country won't care :)

    • @exthorn5539
      @exthorn5539 3 ปีที่แล้ว +66

      @@aaronthebest5519 GER Global Economic Reset.

    • @qilinadairia4442
      @qilinadairia4442 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      This sentence doesn't sound well, but not for the reasons you'd think

  • @FirstNameLastName-qx8ii
    @FirstNameLastName-qx8ii 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3086

    Love how the US just fucking explodes whenever there’s a mildly large conflict that it’s involved in

    • @louisbouvier6679
      @louisbouvier6679 3 ปีที่แล้ว +156

      “Mildly large”

    • @FirstNameLastName-qx8ii
      @FirstNameLastName-qx8ii 3 ปีที่แล้ว +240

      @@louisbouvier6679 the Korean War was a huge conflict, but compared to WW2 it was pretty small. Mildly large

    • @louisbouvier6679
      @louisbouvier6679 3 ปีที่แล้ว +138

      @@FirstNameLastName-qx8ii yeah I know I just thought mildly large sounded funny

    • @somedudes6455
      @somedudes6455 3 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      WWI and WWII are the biggest conflicts humanity has ever been in.

    • @BigAl2-u7e
      @BigAl2-u7e 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      Ah yes, because WORLD WAR ONE and WORLD WAR TWO were "mildly large" conflicts. They only resulted in a total combined death count of 86 million and completely changed the world.

  • @thepriestofvaranasi
    @thepriestofvaranasi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1063

    Enemy nation: Breathes.
    America: Set the military budget to infinity, I repeat, set the military budget to infinity.

    • @Tyler9802
      @Tyler9802 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      No cap lol

    • @vedantshrey9531
      @vedantshrey9531 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Bro don't forget how freaking much they have to pay to their soldiers and running costs to maintain those 11 aircraft carriers. It's that high for a reason I bet other countries can maintain the same amount of resources and personnel in lesser budget than that (no disregard to America tho)

    • @PlutozReal
      @PlutozReal 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @@vedantshrey9531 policing the entire planet is expensive.

    • @Dearjonb
      @Dearjonb 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Feeding the military industrial complex

    • @Agnes135
      @Agnes135 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@Dearjonb Exactly, filling the pockets of the wealthy

  • @jul1anuhd
    @jul1anuhd 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3911

    USA in the past: Lets activate *Sandbox Mode* with unlimited money for a while
    USA Now: *Sandbox Mode* is still on?

    • @blackpillspear2592
      @blackpillspear2592 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Most spending is for veterans pensions

    • @jul1anuhd
      @jul1anuhd 3 ปีที่แล้ว +207

      @@blackpillspear2592 nope.. Development and research of new technologies.

    • @lifeisstrangeisbestgameeve6433
      @lifeisstrangeisbestgameeve6433 3 ปีที่แล้ว +134

      @@jul1anuhd basically discovering new ways to bomb rural villages in the middle east.

    • @jul1anuhd
      @jul1anuhd 3 ปีที่แล้ว +94

      @@lifeisstrangeisbestgameeve6433 that wasn't america just some stupid old men that gave the order to the soldiers. And cmon. Every super power isn't perfect. Just compare the US to Russia or China. Who is arresting peaceful protesters that want a democracy, who run over them with tanks, who arrested navalny only bc he's a "enemy" to the leader. Who has concentration camps for Muslims? Who took over Hongkong, a free democracy etc.?

    • @jul1anuhd
      @jul1anuhd 3 ปีที่แล้ว +50

      @@lifeisstrangeisbestgameeve6433 but I have to agree that america did a lot of things wrong and that it isn't perfect.

  • @TheCosmicViewer
    @TheCosmicViewer 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1969

    United States: I can actively raise and lower my military spending at will.
    Other Countries: Why do you wanna raise it?
    United States: So I can lower it again

    • @baris.ozkaya
      @baris.ozkaya 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      the office nice

    • @maximumgas9448
      @maximumgas9448 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Lmao

    • @maverick300
      @maverick300 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yeah
      They can pull out the money they printed
      For years whenever they want.

    • @maximumgas9448
      @maximumgas9448 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@maverick300 well who is gonna collect the debt. Since the place that lends them the money was made by the government.
      But it would be funny to see the White House get swatted on orders of the president to get the president to pay off the debt

    • @n-hexane8271
      @n-hexane8271 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lol

  • @geno3911
    @geno3911 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2516

    no idea how the allied inspectors were like "yeah those 2 billion dollars are probably going to the tractors and farming equipment"

    • @kingstannisbaratheon7974
      @kingstannisbaratheon7974 3 ปีที่แล้ว +116

      Honestly I wouldn't be surprised if they did notice but thought that it would suit them to have a strong nation between them and the USSR. And avoid provoking Germany into a war before France and Britain were adequately prepared to strike a decisive blow that would avoid a long drawn out war like the first world war. But hey, they ended up getting one that was two years longer and cost over double the lives that the first did. At least it's a good lesson for next time.

    • @DonVigaDeFierro
      @DonVigaDeFierro 3 ปีที่แล้ว +78

      @@kingstannisbaratheon7974 I mean, at the beginning, nobody really though that Toothbrush moustache man would be able to manage the country. Plus, in 1939, France alone had a more than capable military force, and Nutzees were still more or less imperialist virgins, unlike Japan or the Soviets. I believe Allies were more worried that their pact with Walrus moustache man would last too long, as the Soviets were the ones giving them a lot of resources they lacked.
      So, apart from underestimating them, a quick decisive military victory over France was enough to give Germany a good time to control western Europe, but in the end, the economy of the third Reich was still held together with whatever they had instead of duct tape at the time, and there was the whole Operation Barbarossa thing. By the time they failed to make the UK surrender, the war would only get worse and worse for them, and that was as early as 1941.

    • @Amusia727
      @Amusia727 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      @@DonVigaDeFierro Hell, the appeasement policy was probably the only thing that kept the German duct taped economy together, seeing as they were relying on a Ponzi scheme (Mefo Bills) to keep the economy afloat. After the annexation of Austria and the Sudetenland (and later the rest of Czechia), they were in a far better position to wage war (as well as the fact that the British and French betrayed the 4th largest arms exporter at the time, who’d spent a considerable amount of effort building defenses along their German border, only for it to be given away for free after the Munich conference)

    • @TheyCalledMeT
      @TheyCalledMeT 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Ever heared about "mefo bills"?

    • @robertespinoza5958
      @robertespinoza5958 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      The germans pre ww2 "we never said any such thing about tractors we said tracked-terrors

  • @themandalorian5061
    @themandalorian5061 3 ปีที่แล้ว +929

    When a country other than America has the most military spending
    United States: *I feel a great disturbance in the force*

    • @Poppa77
      @Poppa77 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      **spends $700b a year**

    • @diamondkonk1196
      @diamondkonk1196 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@Poppa77 “now no one can pass me!”

    • @luxingyu981
      @luxingyu981 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      USSR:Hello
      America:I find your lack of faith disturbing
      Japan:Well,sorry but...
      America:Apology accepted
      China:
      America:

    • @VoidHxnter
      @VoidHxnter 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@luxingyu981 *both stare angrily at each other*

    • @elianapieprz7170
      @elianapieprz7170 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That is the way

  • @narayasuiryoku1397
    @narayasuiryoku1397 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2691

    Soviet Union : has more soldiers than their enemies have bullets
    USA: Have more planes than they have pilots

    • @the_vortex__1738
      @the_vortex__1738 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Lol

    • @arbysregionalmanager7032
      @arbysregionalmanager7032 3 ปีที่แล้ว +90

      So Murica made one big plane
      *stares intently at AC130 gunship*

    • @buddermonger2000
      @buddermonger2000 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Except when that enemy is America lol

    • @sirloserlot5084
      @sirloserlot5084 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      The russian part is a lie

    • @narayasuiryoku1397
      @narayasuiryoku1397 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I made the calculs, and the manpower required to sustain the US airforce is about 4.8 Millions. That's just for the airforce , there was still 27 Essex Carriers and 100 thousand ranks needing manpower on top of that.

  • @sockaloupe
    @sockaloupe 3 ปีที่แล้ว +721

    Whenever the US goes to war the budget just hits infinity

    • @The_Thousandth_Tex
      @The_Thousandth_Tex 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      That's why the US has been at war for almost it's entire existence :D

    • @bobing1752
      @bobing1752 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@The_Thousandth_Tex it depends if you count conflicts with the Indians. If not, this is not true. Most of the 19th century was peaceful for the US.

    • @darianbarber3763
      @darianbarber3763 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@bobing1752 war of 1812, Spanish american war, civil war (the most bloodiest in counts of death for any American war) these are just the major ones.

    • @bobing1752
      @bobing1752 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@darianbarber3763 yes: those are the dates if the wars that you cited (which are all of the wars since independance until WW1)
      1812-1815, 1846-1848, 1861-1865 and 1898 were years when a war was fought. If we count each of those years as one year of War (even though there might be some years with just 2 months of wars, I don't know the exact dates), that's 13 years of war. So from the end of the war of independance in 1783 to joining WW1 in 1917 (both excluded), 13 years have been years at war and the remaining 119 have not seen a war.
      So I'm safe saying it was not "mostly at war" as the guy said. And actually, even if you count WW1, you have 15 years of war for 140 years of war until joining WW2 in 1940.

    • @KARTIKEYA007
      @KARTIKEYA007 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@bobing1752 I hope you know that just one year of war can basically destroy decades of progress. If a country fights one war every 10 years then it's a horribly aggressive country. USA has been a very very war magnet country since it's independence. It's really shocking how the US government and their people think russia and china(or even north korea) are the war magnets when in reality it's the US which everyone should fear. Ideally a country should really only have one major war every century, not once every decade like the US have had in it's most "peaceful" century(19th century)

  • @TheDarkendstar
    @TheDarkendstar 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6460

    Everyone after the Cold War is over “America buddy are you okay”

    • @jovanjovanovic7721
      @jovanjovanovic7721 3 ปีที่แล้ว +710

      and then they wonder why they dont have free healthcare

    • @jovanjovanovic7721
      @jovanjovanovic7721 3 ปีที่แล้ว +247

      @Vlad Tepes I belive firmly both Russia and China are lying about their spendings, but do they need to maintain so much bases ? No they don't, there are many places where they don't need to be and release it from unnecessary funding, like Kosovo,Iraq etc... They just can't stand someone else taking influence and that's why they are keeping those bases operating.

    • @julioputin3674
      @julioputin3674 3 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      @Vlad Tepes UK also has a shiton of possessions outside of it

    • @Jay-qb9gi
      @Jay-qb9gi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +200

      @@jovanjovanovic7721 we spend $4 trillion on healthcare and $720 billion on military, come again?

    • @Jay-qb9gi
      @Jay-qb9gi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +131

      Free healthcare would quickly kill the country because of how much it costs to maintain, just get a job and get insured to cut the costs lol

  • @accuratejm3849
    @accuratejm3849 3 ปีที่แล้ว +418

    American civil war: "almost lost my cool there..."

  • @PresidentEvil
    @PresidentEvil 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1970

    the scary part: the US only spends 3.4% of its GDP on its military

    • @AFT_05G
      @AFT_05G 3 ปีที่แล้ว +291

      Because GDP’s itself is more than 20 trillion USD

    • @pinheadlarry8401
      @pinheadlarry8401 3 ปีที่แล้ว +73

      Not scary

    • @beausheffield1895
      @beausheffield1895 3 ปีที่แล้ว +518

      @@pinheadlarry8401 depends on which side of the border your on.

    • @infinity8543
      @infinity8543 3 ปีที่แล้ว +397

      @@beausheffield1895 I'd say it's not scary for the entirety of Europe, Japan, South Korea, Israel, India and likewise countries.
      It doesn't depend on which side of the border you are, it depends on which side of the ideology you are.

    • @cienciaplay1211
      @cienciaplay1211 3 ปีที่แล้ว +81

      @@infinity8543 *gets scared in Mexican*

  • @mikehancho2082
    @mikehancho2082 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2006

    America when there wasn’t a war: We’re fine right here in the middle.
    America when a war breaks out: SPEND IT ALLLLLL!!!!!
    America after Cold War: Screw this! Full steam ahead. Buy everything that goes pew, bang, and boom!!!!

    • @Mintpoet
      @Mintpoet 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Well yeah, they need to..

    • @blakesteinbacher4269
      @blakesteinbacher4269 3 ปีที่แล้ว +62

      I loved how America did nothing until the end of WW1 though then claims they won the war

    • @MustacheDLuffy
      @MustacheDLuffy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +91

      @@blakesteinbacher4269 I mean America didn’t even want to be a part of the war. It’s not in Europe

    • @Arkprog
      @Arkprog 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Mintpoet cringe

    • @Joker-no1uh
      @Joker-no1uh 3 ปีที่แล้ว +79

      @@blakesteinbacher4269 Germany wins ww1 if the US doesn't end it.. wtf are you talking about? Of course we didn't win it ourselves, but without us you would have lost

  • @thamizhezhil
    @thamizhezhil 3 ปีที่แล้ว +967

    India before 2007 :
    Chill bruh
    After 2007:
    *DEFENSE MODE INTENSIFIES*

    • @papastalin1543
      @papastalin1543 3 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      Ikr lol and it will only gonna increase for the coming time

    • @deeperthantheabyss624
      @deeperthantheabyss624 3 ปีที่แล้ว +129

      Well I'd increase my Military spendings too if some Communist Bully claims our land is theirs

    • @thamizhezhil
      @thamizhezhil 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@deeperthantheabyss624 I mean it is Justified lol

    • @thamizhezhil
      @thamizhezhil 3 ปีที่แล้ว +110

      @@nixenvines007 1: look up how many toilets were built recently.
      2: jammu and kashmir were already partitioned by Brits and we don't want Jammu and Kashmir to become another Terrorist state .
      3: why should we give northeast lol? Give me one reason?
      4: I'm a South Indian myself and no one wants a separate country and there's no need to. Even if they want how do you determine who's south Indian?
      Lmao why are you hell bent on dividing the country? Sorry to disappoint you but none of these except the toilet building are gonna happen.
      5: stop pasting it everywhere it's annoying
      Or maybe you are jealous that India is diverse and has variety than your whole life?

    • @South_Asian.Fascist-98
      @South_Asian.Fascist-98 3 ปีที่แล้ว +59

      @@nixenvines007 Free Balochistan first

  • @peanutswithoutthet2249
    @peanutswithoutthet2249 3 ปีที่แล้ว +290

    3:44
    Germamy: Alright guys lets go
    3:48
    Germany: Wait hold up I forgot my phone

    • @chrisgeroch4927
      @chrisgeroch4927 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Something something hyperinflation Nov 1923. Hitler #failed coup d'etat beer hall. Use banknotes as wall paper etc.

    • @burn5500
      @burn5500 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      4:13
      Germany: Alright, thanks for waiting. Let’s Go.

  • @thr1ftey763
    @thr1ftey763 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1078

    The world: How much money do you spend on your military, united states?
    The United states: yes

    • @kym.7689
      @kym.7689 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      So Original

    • @codenamegamma7989
      @codenamegamma7989 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Incase your wondering America is 2% russia is 3% and north Korea is 50% this is money spent on military

    • @lesscringeymapperdude
      @lesscringeymapperdude 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      US spends 3% of gdp lmao on military. Russia only spends 2%. France also spends 2%. Saudi Arabia spends 8.4% which is the highest and still has a terrible army

    • @codenamegamma7989
      @codenamegamma7989 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@lesscringeymapperdude us spends 2 and Russia spends 3 got that backwards and north Korea is 50

    • @nyftt4350
      @nyftt4350 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Beans

  • @ArsonPeaPlayz
    @ArsonPeaPlayz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2608

    Everybody gangsta until Germany reaches the top again.

    • @trevordelepine7708
      @trevordelepine7708 3 ปีที่แล้ว +120

      N.Korea, Iran, whatever other punk countries try to talk trash about taking over the world, at least Germany put their money where their mouth is and tried to do it. Twice.

    • @ArsonPeaPlayz
      @ArsonPeaPlayz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      @@trevordelepine7708 i don't even think NK would last long invading the Philippines.
      And we are like, a really weak country.

    • @trevordelepine7708
      @trevordelepine7708 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      @@ArsonPeaPlayz I’m just joking because there are lots of dictators that run their mouth and never do anything. It’s all just posturing. (And honestly there aren’t very many Germans that are actually proud of the last time they tried to take over the world.).

    • @ArsonPeaPlayz
      @ArsonPeaPlayz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@trevordelepine7708 wait. Some Germans are actually like that?

    • @princevanhegen2574
      @princevanhegen2574 3 ปีที่แล้ว +51

      @@ArsonPeaPlayz no we mostly just make fun about france
      And than we say that we love them and that they are good allies.
      And then we use their funny acent when we are drunk.

  • @genghiskhan8782
    @genghiskhan8782 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1635

    *WWII starts*
    *Germany massively increases military spending*
    America: Pathetic

    • @billystokes3917
      @billystokes3917 3 ปีที่แล้ว +58

      If America flexed it's muscles, most countries would be demolished instantly. The survivors would be too injures to continue.

    • @khalidibnalwalid2032
      @khalidibnalwalid2032 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @@billystokes3917 I don't think so

    • @imapopo2924
      @imapopo2924 3 ปีที่แล้ว +72

      @@khalidibnalwalid2032 If planned correctly, the US has the raw military might to cripple most of the world's oil supply using nothing but conventional weapons in a matter of weeks if not days before any real effective counter force could be assembled and effectively starve every other major military opponent of oil while tapping into our own natural oil resources long enough to out last them.
      As unlikely as it is with war being what it is and thus plans rarely going perfectly, we could still feasibly take on the entire world and win, for if no other reason than having a single unified command structure and fewer vulnerabilities that could cripple us entirely. After all, ships, tanks, and strike aircraft cant do shit if they dont have fuel.
      Keep in mind: The USAF is the largest AND most technologically advanced air force on Earth. The second largest air force on Earth is the US Navy.
      The USN is also the largest Navy on Earth and has the supply networks to be able to go where ever the Hell they want. No one else does. The Royal Navy comes closer than most, but still doesnt compare.
      And we are an all volunteer fighting force. Imagine how ludicrously huge we could get if we started doing conscriptions or a draft in time of war.
      Of course, this is all purely theoretical and odds are, even we would lose a war against literally everyone else... But the fact that we even have a chance in that fight says a lot.

    • @khalidibnalwalid2032
      @khalidibnalwalid2032 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@imapopo2924 Ya i agree but if they tamper with the oil line almost all the major countries will be angry and the US is no match to the whole world even though they are the most technically advanced nation

    • @yousef1354
      @yousef1354 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      @@imapopo2924 Taliban defeated the hole NATO
      And we don't need to talk about the Vietcong

  • @sonnythankey
    @sonnythankey 3 ปีที่แล้ว +368

    UK: Remember when that was us?
    *looks at USA*
    Germany: Yeah…

    • @binns5302
      @binns5302 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Ah yes remember when he was just a child look at him now blowing up innocent people I'm so proud.

    • @animalman6670
      @animalman6670 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@binns5302 🙄

    • @VoidHxnter
      @VoidHxnter 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@binns5302 I think you pronounce that *”acceptable casualties”*
      /s

    • @ryanwarner5006
      @ryanwarner5006 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@binns5302 inoccent people. No such thing.

    • @Mautiks
      @Mautiks 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@binns5302 Says the subject of the queen whose empire conquered 1/3 of the planet through military force, mostly by firing cannons at dudes armed with bows and arrows LOL…

  • @sthenelos1
    @sthenelos1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +413

    I like how France is pretty consistently among the top 5 and yet they still end up being called cowards who are too afraid to fight

    • @buddermonger2000
      @buddermonger2000 3 ปีที่แล้ว +56

      That reputation has been there since the Franco-Prussian War of 1870s and then all went downhill from there

    • @themaninabucket8365
      @themaninabucket8365 3 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      @@buddermonger2000 I thought that myth was mainly forged during WW2?

    • @buddermonger2000
      @buddermonger2000 3 ปีที่แล้ว +52

      @@themaninabucket8365 No that's when it was cemented but uh... yeah no that started in the Franco-Prussian War, Then in the Great War, then the second one, and then Vietnam. If you think a myth is from a single event usually you can find something else before it.

    • @themaninabucket8365
      @themaninabucket8365 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@buddermonger2000 fascinating. Keep up the good work

    • @kancer_mufen
      @kancer_mufen 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      As the saying goes
      "The French copy no one, and no one copys the French."

  • @joekent5675
    @joekent5675 3 ปีที่แล้ว +205

    3:44 Soviet union: "Hi all!"
    Russia: "Bye all!"
    World: "Um, what?!"

    • @andyjacobs7010
      @andyjacobs7010 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Yeah, perhaps they should have done that for China... it was a little weird seeing the PRC flag in the early 20th century while even showing the nationalist flag in wars with Japan.

    • @tathagataray9158
      @tathagataray9158 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I don't think they use all
      That's american

  • @kaiserschmarrn260
    @kaiserschmarrn260 3 ปีที่แล้ว +561

    Germany didn’t exist untill 1870/71 and only used the modern flag after ww1 so I don’t know what was going on in 1839

    • @columbien10
      @columbien10 3 ปีที่แล้ว +134

      I think using the modern name of the countries is for simplicity sake, but I also wonder what number they used for military spending before the german unification. Did they add all german principalities into one? Did they only take prussia into account?

    • @isaiahparis
      @isaiahparis 3 ปีที่แล้ว +54

      @@columbien10 probably just prussia

    • @sayerqt5916
      @sayerqt5916 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Prussia

    • @kaiserschmarrn260
      @kaiserschmarrn260 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@isaiahparis might have been the German conffedaration

    • @isaiahparis
      @isaiahparis 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@kaiserschmarrn260 might have been luxembourg

  • @archdemon108
    @archdemon108 3 ปีที่แล้ว +111

    Love how you can see the exact moment when WWII goes from being not America's problem to America's problem when pearl harbor happens.

    • @erniebuchinski3614
      @erniebuchinski3614 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Why would it have been any different? Every country has its own interests, and militarily strong countries don't generally roll over like sheep when attacked, as weaker ones so often do. Perhaps you're not able to grasp such a concept, for whatever reason, but that's how geopolitical reality usually works. Here in Europe, for example, nobody really gave a damn about climate change until it started having negative effects here very recently. Now all of the sudden it's some kind of priority (at least it's spoken about more, although I doubt much will really be done in the near future) in places such as Germany, and will no doubt soon be a priority in other places, as things get worse. It's really not rocket science to understand how these things actually work.

    • @maestrulgamer9695
      @maestrulgamer9695 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@erniebuchinski3614
      So US needs to face more disasters before caring about climate change?

    • @gorgilovesbasketball8251
      @gorgilovesbasketball8251 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Even before Pearl Harbor, America was already spending tons of money on their military. FDR knew war was inevitable and wanted the US to be prepared for when the conflict finally arrived, which is why even when Pearl Harbor happened in December of 1941, America was already spending a shit load of money in 1941. Plus Lend-Lease became a thing in June 1941 where America manufactured a shit load of artillery for Britain, USSR, and China. (Mostly Britain)

  • @Senerski
    @Senerski 3 ปีที่แล้ว +318

    Poland in 1948 be like: Ye that sound like a reasonable amount of money to spend

    • @waldek323PL
      @waldek323PL 3 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      I guess they had to rebuild their whole military. That would explain a huge spike in those couple years but I don't see the reason why Poland stayed on 4-5 for half of the cold war. Probably USSR wanted them to militarise like crazy.

    • @Fabiano.Escobar.012
      @Fabiano.Escobar.012 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Spain in 2000 be like: I just want to protect myself from terrorism

    • @sulphurous2656
      @sulphurous2656 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Somewhat surprising nonetheless considering Poland just suffered almost a trillion dollars in damages from the war.

    • @bayron45
      @bayron45 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sulphurous2656 Lol, the whole country wasn't worth even 1 billion dollars back then.

    • @sulphurous2656
      @sulphurous2656 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@bayron45 Adjusted for inflation.

  • @mighty_robo
    @mighty_robo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1041

    America: Guys I found this free money hack!
    Other countries: It’s a virus…
    America: *laughs in money*

    • @NocturnalNugget2
      @NocturnalNugget2 3 ปีที่แล้ว +54

      America figured out how to download ram

    • @IceBox666theone666
      @IceBox666theone666 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      America lives on boroved time guys. Ypu cant spent what you dont have and that for several years...it will catch up with you....as it is doing. But do not worrie it will be you and others at the bottom and your children who will have to pay for this. And the banks and bankers and their friends in the WH are smiling.

    • @MrVapourGFX
      @MrVapourGFX 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      @@IceBox666theone666 No, quit sippin bleach and smoking dmt while watching conspiracies. Without the us dollar or strong us economy the rest of the world would fail. Similarly in China.

    • @pusilanime7924
      @pusilanime7924 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      El que no arriesga no gana

    • @krause6718
      @krause6718 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@pusilanime7924 no entienden español

  • @prestonokk6355
    @prestonokk6355 3 ปีที่แล้ว +583

    I like how the USA doesn’t even need a standin military all they need is home defence and a good navy and they’re safe xd

    • @Adlais279
      @Adlais279 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      Worked for the uk

    • @cuddlemuffin.9545
      @cuddlemuffin.9545 3 ปีที่แล้ว +53

      We do have a strategic umbrella that's the reason we spend a lot

    • @prestonokk6355
      @prestonokk6355 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@cuddlemuffin.9545 only 102 billion out of the nearly 800 billion is used for defence

    • @cuddlemuffin.9545
      @cuddlemuffin.9545 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@prestonokk6355 what do you mean? Elaborate please

    • @prestonokk6355
      @prestonokk6355 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      @@cuddlemuffin.9545 The United States military budget is nearly 800 billion dollars, only 102 billion is allocated to defence, the rest of it is used for a standing military, navy, airforce etc

  • @lunarcat4278
    @lunarcat4278 3 ปีที่แล้ว +82

    American spending during its Civil War: *happens*
    America: I guess you guys aren't ready for that yet, but your kids are gonna love it.

    • @ChiRedWhiteBlue
      @ChiRedWhiteBlue 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Stellar comment. Kids won't get the BTTF reference 🤭

    • @yutahkotomi5156
      @yutahkotomi5156 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Got the reference~

  • @psychogoji
    @psychogoji 3 ปีที่แล้ว +173

    My mind is blown that New Zealand of all countries is in the Top 10 during WWII, let alone at all.

    • @dragooll2023
      @dragooll2023 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      To be fair, they had half a millon soldiers, wich is very surprising for NZ

    • @CrazyDutchguys
      @CrazyDutchguys 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Same her for the Netherlands, we were on the list for a while

    • @coreymicallef365
      @coreymicallef365 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I'm surprised Australia ended up outspending Italy for most of the war. They were supposed to be one of the major powers.

    • @dragooll2023
      @dragooll2023 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@coreymicallef365 It was only counting the occupied part of Italy, not the whole MD borders

    • @coreymicallef365
      @coreymicallef365 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@dragooll2023 Italy entered the war in June1940 and none of Italy proper was occupied until July 1943 closely followed by the Italian Armistice in September 1943. According to this Australia overtook Italy in military spending sometime in 1940 and never lost that lead until after the war in 1948.

  • @praisethesunstudios7931
    @praisethesunstudios7931 3 ปีที่แล้ว +130

    Love how every single time there’s any way regarding America whatsoever the US military budget shoots to the top the goes all the way down again.

    • @dragooll2023
      @dragooll2023 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Because they were selling weapons. Take in count that they were using aprox 4% of their GDP

    • @buddermonger2000
      @buddermonger2000 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dragooll2023 Explain?

    • @themaninabucket8365
      @themaninabucket8365 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@buddermonger2000 the US military budget is about 4% of the United States’ total economic output.

    • @britratcliffe6423
      @britratcliffe6423 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Except after WWII, they never came back down after that

  • @-Subtle-
    @-Subtle- 3 ปีที่แล้ว +596

    USSR bankrupted their people with military expenditures.
    USA: hold my beer.

    • @alexnowicki286
      @alexnowicki286 3 ปีที่แล้ว +94

      Only difference, we’re still here and richer than ever

    • @makadur7438
      @makadur7438 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@alexnowicki286 LuL

    • @korovabozha4963
      @korovabozha4963 3 ปีที่แล้ว +92

      @@alexnowicki286 richer unequally yes.

    • @natureblank1401
      @natureblank1401 3 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      The great Soviet Union never collapsed by itself it was all an Initial Western plan. The US got pro-American traitor Gorbachev in power who destroyed the Soviet Union. The US knows it can never beat Russia in military might so they use and have used traitors like Navalny and Gorbechev to down the great and almighty power against their terrorism around the world.

    • @natureblank1401
      @natureblank1401 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@alexnowicki286 true they will never destroy us. We're back to destroy their sweet dreams and world order

  • @seupai686
    @seupai686 3 ปีที่แล้ว +196

    *Germany starts investing on military
    Everybody: ah shit here we go again

    • @Demajl.418
      @Demajl.418 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      This is how it will be bc germany can spend more money for our military in 2022😀 (We weren't allowed bc ww2 until 2022) But you guys better trust us we have learned from our history😂😂👍

    • @matthiashugner6085
      @matthiashugner6085 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Wait till 2022

    • @-xnnybimb-9398
      @-xnnybimb-9398 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      2022: third times the charm

    • @patrickp.1001
      @patrickp.1001 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@matthiashugner6085 Here we go

    • @PineappleMaxwell
      @PineappleMaxwell ปีที่แล้ว

      Welp.. this aged beautifully

  • @Jrookus
    @Jrookus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +357

    Nations whenever they’re at war:
    *GAS GAS GAS*

    • @lightningseven586
      @lightningseven586 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      In WW1 this has double meaning for Germany😁

    • @joshlawrence7093
      @joshlawrence7093 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@lightningseven586 noooooooooooo, my great grandfather died back then. He tragically fell out of one of the guard towers overlooking the gas chambers

    • @lightningseven586
      @lightningseven586 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@joshlawrence7093 What? I was talking about the trench gas in World War 1, not the gas chambers.

    • @joshuaantoine4575
      @joshuaantoine4575 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@joshlawrence7093 I think your thinking of WW2 buddy

    • @kannonball5789
      @kannonball5789 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@lightningseven586 let's be honest it had double meanings in both world wars for Germany

  • @mightymak99
    @mightymak99 3 ปีที่แล้ว +367

    World looking at US spending: Compensating for something?
    USA: Yeah. Weak allies.

    • @scottwhitley3392
      @scottwhitley3392 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Not really. If the us lowered its defence spending then France, Britain’s and Germany’s budgets would skyrocket to over $100B a year each most likely.

    • @lesscringeymapperdude
      @lesscringeymapperdude 3 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      @@scottwhitley3392 no it wouldn’t lmao they don’t even spend 5% on NATO

    • @scottwhitley3392
      @scottwhitley3392 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@lesscringeymapperdude yes it would. The U.K. has left the EU and it’s defence budget jumped by £20billion a year.

    • @lesscringeymapperdude
      @lesscringeymapperdude 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @Heinrich Heinrich fair point

    • @lesscringeymapperdude
      @lesscringeymapperdude 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@scottwhitley3392 ah ok

  • @leni8511
    @leni8511 3 ปีที่แล้ว +203

    France after more than 1000 years on top : let's take a little break

    • @tangow371
      @tangow371 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      More like retirement at this point.

    • @leni8511
      @leni8511 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      @@tangow371 no bro, don't worry the comeback is coming

    • @paflamenace6513
      @paflamenace6513 3 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      @@tangow371 well, still the best European army by far, so...

    • @TheTrooper1878
      @TheTrooper1878 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@paflamenace6513 Well yes but at this point there is no need for army in Europe itself.

    • @vincentdesun
      @vincentdesun 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      More like 50 years. The chart conveniently ignores every Chinese dynasty ever existed.

  • @mattweger437
    @mattweger437 3 ปีที่แล้ว +310

    It's kinda weird to think that US military spending used to make sense.

    • @kingzahhak911
      @kingzahhak911 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      No, you just forget how unimportant we were then. Back in the cold war we spent 7% of GDP on defense, now it's half of that. Defense spending took up a half of a third of all yearly US spending in 2019. Now with the pandemic it's a even smaller percentage.

    • @mattweger437
      @mattweger437 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      @@kingzahhak911 the us military literally hasn't accomplished anything useful since WWII

    • @kingzahhak911
      @kingzahhak911 3 ปีที่แล้ว +56

      They got Saddam. They liberated Kuwait. They protected South Korea, and if we kept giving South Vietnam spare parts and oil they would persisted as well. They invaded Grenada and Panama. They deterred Soviets in Europe and the Chinese in Taiwan. Our navy protects global trade. It's scheer power makes despots think twice before doing stupid stuff. It's presence gave Europe assurance that the system of military and economic compitition had ended, allowing them to integrate into the NWO. I wish we invaded more countries nowadays. Myanmar is in desperate need of an invasion, and so is Venezuela.

    • @ArkSucksAtGames
      @ArkSucksAtGames 3 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      @@mattweger437 most modern technology and modern medicine comes from the U.S

    • @buddermonger2000
      @buddermonger2000 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@kingzahhak911 Not sure about Venezuela, but you're right about Myanmar

  • @user-up7nb6id1f
    @user-up7nb6id1f 3 ปีที่แล้ว +107

    It was really insane to see how the Soviet Union skyrocketed it’s military spending in between the First World War and the second one. Like, honestly... it was by far the number one in the world... I expected it to just trade places during the Cold War... but this was surprising

    • @lordium1848
      @lordium1848 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Did u see how America skyrocketed and it still grows

    • @Joseph-dw8qc
      @Joseph-dw8qc 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@lordium1848 not surprised

  • @goatyqt4553
    @goatyqt4553 3 ปีที่แล้ว +147

    USA : *puts hundreds of billions in military stuff for decades*
    Americans : I see this as an absolute win

    • @Boombi_
      @Boombi_ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @Todd Lerfahndler Well it is sad to see. How can you think that spending so much money into military is a win. Yes the US kind of is obligated to keep its budget high because of China but honestly even then your argument doesn't make sense.

    • @Blu_Jay07
      @Blu_Jay07 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @Todd Lerfahndler EXACTLY

    • @freddarau
      @freddarau 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Boombi_ it's not that high were spending 2.2% of our gdp on the military. China has just hit 6.9% of there gdp in military.

    • @feelingnether158
      @feelingnether158 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @Todd Lerfahndler yeah Americans totally not genocide an entire civilization to settle. Those 40 millions natives didn’t exist anyway.

    • @dreadlist1711
      @dreadlist1711 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@freddarau 3.4 not 2.2, and thats just gdp, of actual budget it is more like 15%

  • @silentstranger49
    @silentstranger49 3 ปีที่แล้ว +153

    4:28
    United states is just like
    "Your not that guy pal, trust me, your not that guy"

    • @protorhinocerator142
      @protorhinocerator142 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Kudos for working an Amos Burton quote into the mix.

    • @fashistz
      @fashistz 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Хмм а умеют у вас аккуратно мозги промывать .

    • @jexiagalleta4712
      @jexiagalleta4712 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@protorhinocerator142 ayyyy
      I've nearly finished season 3

  • @spam_botio9958
    @spam_botio9958 3 ปีที่แล้ว +92

    USA: "No. 1 is No. 1, even if it costs me hundreds of billions of dollars"

    • @silverfruit14
      @silverfruit14 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Tbh comparing our military budget to our actual GDP is like comparing an ant to a mountain

    • @elfugaming4296
      @elfugaming4296 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@silverfruit14 and what about debt

    • @83athom
      @83athom 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@elfugaming4296 Even if the US stopped spending anything on the military... we'd still be at a budget deficit. Government spending for ya.

    • @Civa.
      @Civa. 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@83athom us:debt
      Joe biden:1.9 trillion here maybe a couple billion there maybe another trillion

    • @phrime5627
      @phrime5627 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      And still No.2 or 3

  • @zackenprinz
    @zackenprinz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +68

    As a German it feels quite weird to see my country in the top ten. Nowadays it feels like we dont spend any money on military

    • @jaschlit
      @jaschlit 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That’s because the world enjoys the little brother spending all our money to keep wars over there and not over here.

    • @mokushmasmo6009
      @mokushmasmo6009 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      That's not a bad thing

    • @ironbooze2937
      @ironbooze2937 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Seems like they spend the money very efficiently

    • @zackenprinz
      @zackenprinz 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jaschlit well we don't have problems here with that. So it's fine I guess

    • @furiosa1203
      @furiosa1203 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      It's not really a bad thing. You can still be a mega super power without spending hundreds of billions on a military, lol

  • @Balnazzardi
    @Balnazzardi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +188

    From 1931 onwards: Germany starts huge re-armament of its army
    WW1 winners: This is fine, totally fine, whats the worst thing that could happen :)

    • @tcg1_qc
      @tcg1_qc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They knew but didn't do anything due to the great depression, and they didn't take hitler seriously

    • @Balnazzardi
      @Balnazzardi 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tcg1_qc ye I know, and they thought that appeasement policy would work and that Hitler would stop making more demands...and I guess there was also more of a fear of Stalin and spread of communism at the time as well, so that too had an effect on how things went

    • @viktorolasz8583
      @viktorolasz8583 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The most funny of all the things Hitler didn't even wanted to fight the brits nor the us but for some reason the brits wanted to criple germany no matter what

    • @Balnazzardi
      @Balnazzardi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@viktorolasz8583 well Brits with Chamberlain in charge tried the appeasement policy to the very end by not lifting a finger when Germany broke treary of Versailles one piece at a time and annexed Austria and Czechoslovakia. However after the latter happened, UK and France had made pact with Poland in hopes it would stop Hitler with his ambitions to expand Germany's borders even further but Hitler thought that UK and France were just bluffing and would yield as they had done before. UK would have completely lost their face if they had not declared war on Germany when the invasion of Poland started.
      So quite the contrary, UK didnt want war either but Hitler's actions in the end left them no choice and ofc afterwards there was no other solution to the war than to force Nazi Germany to complete surrender and purge Nazi party and Nazi ideology from Germany entirely

    • @viktorolasz8583
      @viktorolasz8583 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Balnazzardi Hitler only wanted to unite germany people because the poor treatment of germanys in the lost teritorys and poland refused to meet hitlers demands twice (first they wanted an auotobach to the lost germany lands,second stop harassing the germanys) and also the UK did not join the war like they promised to poland they just watched hitler and stalin tearing poland apart.

  • @RoboticsBay
    @RoboticsBay 3 ปีที่แล้ว +233

    1941 America to Germany: I'm about to end this man's whole career

    • @devl8565
      @devl8565 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ai malf

    • @hailerm2238
      @hailerm2238 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Deko estrada go brrrr

    • @kreghzdee
      @kreghzdee 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Soviet Union defeated germany, not USA, but okay

    • @jojomaster7675
      @jojomaster7675 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      They didn't really do anything in ww2 Europe until 1944 though...

    • @jojomaster7675
      @jojomaster7675 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@kreghzdee As well as Great Britain

  • @amaaign
    @amaaign 3 ปีที่แล้ว +118

    you know it's serious when the united states has to spend over 4, almost 5 times as much as the next on the leaderboard against itself

    • @hamiltoneu
      @hamiltoneu 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Next ten barely match what the USA spends.

    • @PeterSedesse
      @PeterSedesse ปีที่แล้ว

      there was a point when we outspent the next 18 countries combined. But it is a bit misleading because our defense industry is private companies who pay corporate taxes and all their employees pay income taxes. More than 25% of our defense spending immediatly comes back as taxes the following year. unlike a country like Saudi Arabia whose defense spending pretty much all goes to us companies

  • @gabrielsusas3722
    @gabrielsusas3722 3 ปีที่แล้ว +412

    1800s** France: I’m king here.
    1900s** France: well I welcome the soviet union as our new king.

    • @Mintpoet
      @Mintpoet 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      No idea what you're talking about

    • @gabrielsusas3722
      @gabrielsusas3722 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Mintpoet I have tho and france was the power of mainland europe until the revolution came and then the soviet union got big on ideas and then their ideas paid off.
      You have something to say?
      No offense on that question.

    • @gabrielsusas3722
      @gabrielsusas3722 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Gaussianform I'm not a gamer though. I'm just a plain historian.

    • @wiedzmin8204
      @wiedzmin8204 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@gabrielsusas3722 I disagree, France while powerful became the laughing stock of Europe after the French-Prussian war which gave Prussia Alsace Lorraine.

    • @AFT_05G
      @AFT_05G 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      By 1871 Germany became the strongest country in Western Europe until their defeat in WW2

  • @satyamdey4527
    @satyamdey4527 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    For the Indians here, India enters the chat at 5:04 , leaves at 5:49 , re-enters at 6:03 , again leaves at 6:30 , again re-enters at 6:38

    • @avi7285
      @avi7285 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Thanks 😂😂😂😂😂

    • @Subhrajyoti
      @Subhrajyoti 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Like I guess we have 4th largest but it is showing 3rd largest
      Correct me if I am wrong

    • @SomeonEE123
      @SomeonEE123 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Subhrajyoti Now India has 3rd largest.It used to’ve 4rth largest but now it has 3rd largest.

    • @Subhrajyoti
      @Subhrajyoti 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SomeonEE123 can u give the official data?

    • @HelloWorld-os2cg
      @HelloWorld-os2cg 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you ❤️

  • @deadflesh1000
    @deadflesh1000 3 ปีที่แล้ว +134

    Brazil's racing and then suddenly says "lemme grab a cup o' coffee, brb" disappears and then yeets itself up again like "that's what we call café do bom, parceiro"

    • @3_14pie
      @3_14pie 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      r/suddenlycaralho

    • @Eusoujoa1
      @Eusoujoa1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@3_14pie kk

  • @game-cholic2969
    @game-cholic2969 3 ปีที่แล้ว +79

    1:15 Invention of warp speed

  • @keylans.9452
    @keylans.9452 3 ปีที่แล้ว +152

    Everyone: nooo U.S you can't just keep your military spending up significantly more than everyone!
    U.S: I missed the part where thats my problem

    • @conspiracypanda1200
      @conspiracypanda1200 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      *Looks at everything in America that desperately needs funding but isn't military*: "Yes, we can see that."

    • @isaacwest276
      @isaacwest276 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I’d rather be by far no. 1 than barely no. 1.

  • @joermnyc
    @joermnyc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +170

    Perfect timing on the music for the Cold War.
    China at the end trying to stretch to where the US is... “How does he do it?”

    • @willzhong2229
      @willzhong2229 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      no, we don't wanna do that. China focus on reduce poverty population till now . Chinese minitary cost is about 1.3%-1.4% of its GDP.

    • @bk7256
      @bk7256 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@willzhong2229 it's much higher

    • @scott7224
      @scott7224 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@willzhong2229 I mean, they're probably just hiding their true spending.

    • @levelazn
      @levelazn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@scott7224 we build Chinatowns everywhere. The ultimate weapon is Chinese culture :)

    • @buddermonger2000
      @buddermonger2000 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@levelazn Yeah but the enemy is the CCP Not the Chinese people. So we don't exactly care.

  • @project22-ab88
    @project22-ab88 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    World War: *Begins*
    America: "I am speed."

    • @vladimirfasyura8191
      @vladimirfasyura8191 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Uncle Sam, addressing the people: "I need your money for ... for .... defense!"
      🤡🤣🤣👍

    • @jjwh
      @jjwh 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@vladimirfasyura8191 There’s a reason America’s still on top 😎

    • @fashistz
      @fashistz 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Когда на СССР напали Америка помогала , я не а
      помню как в наступлении ,но Берлин пополам разделили

    • @Gatao_2020
      @Gatao_2020 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      America is a continent not a country

  • @extraordinarytv5451
    @extraordinarytv5451 3 ปีที่แล้ว +242

    I love how Russian invasion of Afghanistan fails and they just collapse lmao

    • @SmokeDog1871
      @SmokeDog1871 3 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      It was a couple things, chernobyl was pretty big factor too

    • @Dk-ie4te
      @Dk-ie4te 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      Well Afghanistan is graveyard of empires.

    • @australium7374
      @australium7374 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      @@SmokeDog1871 Chernobyl was not a factor for Russian collapse it was sad and emotional but the Russian collapse was attributed to the extreme unstable politics and economic factors the USSR collapsed because the violence and repression it was founded upon was useless after glasnost and perestroika

    • @Bop4yH87
      @Bop4yH87 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Dk-ie4te honestly, usa is graveyard of ussr ( but it's true that ussr needed more moral and physical freedom for their citizens. That broken Perestroika gived a lot of dies, wild-wild capitalism, and destroyed any humanity and national idea of Russians and other ussr nations. We are still suffering. We were beaten, destroyed from the inside, and still getting sideway look at us. That's why we have such a backlash nowadays.

    • @heyyo6050
      @heyyo6050 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Dk-ie4te Do people still believe in that old 19th century british propoganda

  • @CNR.5K
    @CNR.5K 3 ปีที่แล้ว +78

    I love how the US hit 1 billion as soon as we came out of the depression, even before we were involved with WWII, and just never looked back

    • @supremturtle4491
      @supremturtle4491 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      The military spending is the reason that the US came out of the depression, not the other way around.

    • @freddarau
      @freddarau 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@supremturtle4491 you are 100% correct

    • @nieznajomy7
      @nieznajomy7 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@supremturtle4491 you are 100% correct, if they wouldn't fight with other countries, they would have to work for that money instead of stealing it from other country's

    • @deathbringer9893
      @deathbringer9893 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@nieznajomy7 ..............

    • @MrVapourGFX
      @MrVapourGFX 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@nieznajomy7 America haters are so strange. Freedom to live on this planet is thanks to the US, that's really just a fact. If not the USA it would need to be someone else.

  • @schleeb8042
    @schleeb8042 3 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    The US just drops into every war with it's back pocket change lmfao

    • @tieman3790
      @tieman3790 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It creates the wars often

  • @protorhinocerator142
    @protorhinocerator142 3 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    The USA during the American Civil War: (spends lots of money)
    Rest of world "Wow!"
    USA: "And this isn't even my final form yet."

  • @davidjacobson6791
    @davidjacobson6791 3 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    The Americans whenever they get into a war: Hello, I’d like to make a withdrawal please.

    • @ElLie-cl1qj
      @ElLie-cl1qj 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm American and you are absolutely correct!!!!!

  • @petemitchell9996
    @petemitchell9996 3 ปีที่แล้ว +57

    Yugoslavia be like: hey everyone I'm Yugosl- bye everyone!

  • @ASyah-eb5yl
    @ASyah-eb5yl 3 ปีที่แล้ว +50

    3:45 is the best moment!

    • @legoeater6920
      @legoeater6920 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Germany: hi there
      USSR:
      Germany:by there

    • @WombRaider001
      @WombRaider001 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I prefer 1:23

    • @WombRaider001
      @WombRaider001 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      after seeing the clip I agree

  • @Orya.e
    @Orya.e 3 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    I like how Mexico poped in like "yo wassup ok bye"

    • @JRandaII
      @JRandaII 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Mexico: Hey!
      Other Countries: No!
      Mexico: Okay...

  • @tuahsakato17
    @tuahsakato17 3 ปีที่แล้ว +207

    Japan and Germany always close together d'awww

  • @evilmountain7147
    @evilmountain7147 3 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    The USA from WWII onwards: “So anyway I started spending”

  • @Sich97
    @Sich97 3 ปีที่แล้ว +73

    Makes you question the vagueness of the "War on terror", since it looks like both the U.S and Soviet/Russia have fought wars continuously since WW2 only to indirectly fight each other, and now being the current military top dog, the U.S needs another justification than Russia/China to maintain its huge military spending and real-scenario training of their troops.

    • @dr.pepper6474
      @dr.pepper6474 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      apparently the U.S has treaties to defend 51 other nations, has unofficial alliances with numerous groups, and constantly gets called to oppose things like genocide in other countries.

    • @NaderBerbish
      @NaderBerbish 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@dr.pepper6474 oppose?
      More like indirectly support using private armies

    • @joermnyc
      @joermnyc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Proxy wars... for examples see Central America... and we’re still dealing with the consequences from those... it’s not Mexicans trying to climb the wall, it’s people from the places we screwed up to to “stop the Commies.”

    • @youarenotverysmart
      @youarenotverysmart 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The US is seen as the world's top defender and offender for their allied/unofficial allied nations, a middle man in which a war breaks out, so to a certain extent it's understandable why they spend so much.

    • @Sich97
      @Sich97 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@dr.pepper6474 The U.S is not alone in having such a role internationally, yet they have a military spending that most other countries can't even be compared to.
      Do you think the huge military spending is solely based on good will? And if yes, would you say the same for Russia?

  • @enlightshadow4852
    @enlightshadow4852 3 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    America before each world war: yeah this seems like an aight budget
    America entering the world wars: If yall cant finish it, I fucking will

  • @user-xt3lu6hp8e
    @user-xt3lu6hp8e 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    6:29 : India: "Hello"
    6:35 : india: "Bounjour"
    6:38 : India: "Konichiwa"

  • @ComradeDiana
    @ComradeDiana 3 ปีที่แล้ว +79

    Just wish the flags were accurate for their times. For example, China and Yugoslavia.

    • @vadimblyat5436
      @vadimblyat5436 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      As far as i saw yugoslavia was accurate. Correct me if i'm wrong tho

    • @Rallego
      @Rallego 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      And Germany 😳

    • @thedrain9328
      @thedrain9328 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@vadimblyat5436 When they first appear in the timeline(20's), Yugoslavia and China were a kingdom and a republic respectively

    • @scoopidywhoop7484
      @scoopidywhoop7484 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I don’t think they’ve got the eggs to throw the Chinese national flag up

    • @louisbouvier6679
      @louisbouvier6679 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I don’t blame him it would be a lot of work

  • @spymaster3366
    @spymaster3366 3 ปีที่แล้ว +96

    When China's and Russia's combined spending is less than half of the us
    usa presidents : we need to protect ourselves from Russia and China

    • @Retrofire-47
      @Retrofire-47 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      China's military is more advanced now, and way more efficient too, so

    • @spymaster3366
      @spymaster3366 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@Retrofire-47 you are so misinformed its funny if usa air force fought China's it would be like china had paper planes

    • @jasonchen1091
      @jasonchen1091 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@spymaster3366 that’s not how war works.

    • @letitpoppin1111
      @letitpoppin1111 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Tf they all have enough to destroy the world a few times. Doesnt matter

    • @alfeeman
      @alfeeman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      With 7000 nuclear war heads, US is complaining and "worried" about China for expanding its meager 300-ish warhead arsenal

  • @Ludwig-van-Beethoven1824
    @Ludwig-van-Beethoven1824 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    If anyone is wondering, the Soviet Union’s military budget exploded in the 1920’s because of the Russian civil war (1917-1922), the Polish-soviet war (1919-1921), and independence wars of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia in 1918-1920. Basically the Russians were fighting like 5 wars at once

  • @TheSpaniard
    @TheSpaniard 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    World war starts>American military spending skyrockets>world war ends, rinse, repeat

  • @hagalathekido
    @hagalathekido 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    the fact that the ussr spent more money on military most of the cold war is interesting, especially considering their equipment and army military wages were cheaper

    • @THEoneYETI
      @THEoneYETI 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      you have to factor in all the juicy corruption of a communist system

    • @lewkie9825
      @lewkie9825 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@THEoneYETI what?

    • @THEoneYETI
      @THEoneYETI 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@lewkie9825 how the USSR spent more money, yet had a worse military with worse gear and worse wages. Corruption

    • @zakattack8624
      @zakattack8624 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      All the oligarchs taking in extra spending money from military funds ;)

    • @Thematic2177
      @Thematic2177 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@THEoneYETI the Soviet military technology wasn't any worse than American at the time.

  • @ktoth29
    @ktoth29 3 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    God, what a terrifying infographic. I was on the edge of my seat the whole time.

    • @RankingCharts
      @RankingCharts  3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      I hope it was enjoyable!

    • @cooki7998
      @cooki7998 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It was!

  • @tulangkerangka1599
    @tulangkerangka1599 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Germany is at the top again lmao

    • @Averagepoetrylover
      @Averagepoetrylover 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      3rd just behind China and the US

    • @UnknownUser_10
      @UnknownUser_10 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Averagepoetrylover Yes. In 2022 Germany will spend close to 200 billion into military and in the following years more than 2% of their GDP.

    • @TheMarth17
      @TheMarth17 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@UnknownUser_10 No it isnt 200 b euro. That was even for us german speakers a bit confusing with his formulation in his speech. The 100 b euro extra fond caps the total military fund at that. It isnt on top of the already planned budget. Moreover it isnt sealed in stone. The parlament has to give the green light but from the whole situation I think it will happen.

    • @totallynotapokemonfan1913
      @totallynotapokemonfan1913 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheMarth17 isn’t it 112 b euro? thought he said 100 b US dollar which equals about 112 b euro
      Ps: nvm you are right it was 100 b euro

    • @kriegshammer2161
      @kriegshammer2161 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@UnknownUser_10
      100 billion for new weapons next 3-4 years.
      + every year budget 65-70 billion.
      2021 50 billion.

  • @phlegmsmoothie
    @phlegmsmoothie 3 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    4:44 everyone's gangsta until the real gangsta enters, just after independence

  • @xernax1841
    @xernax1841 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    1830:
    [...]
    Germany
    [...]
    "Something's wrong I can feel it"

  • @deathvraider6475
    @deathvraider6475 3 ปีที่แล้ว +128

    Imagine if atleast 1/4th of the money US spends on military goes to NASA..

    • @askeladden450
      @askeladden450 3 ปีที่แล้ว +50

      *free healthcare. Space exploration comes after social welfare

    • @mentos93
      @mentos93 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      @@askeladden450 alot of people join the army for its benefits. When those are good for every citizen less people would join it. That might be the reason why the US doesn't have some of those social services.

    • @peterlustig6888
      @peterlustig6888 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yes. Or other scientific exploration.

    • @xxxhalo4everxxx
      @xxxhalo4everxxx 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@askeladden450 you'd have about 100 dollars a person in health care

    • @Jay-qb9gi
      @Jay-qb9gi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@askeladden450 you’re basically asking the government to hemorrhage hundreds of billions each year on something that’s person can work for

  • @oliversnetwork9783
    @oliversnetwork9783 3 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    pov: when your friend finds out they can bring things from creative mode to survival

  • @lucadehaan6710
    @lucadehaan6710 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    By how much do you want to decrease the militairy spending?
    The Dutch: YES

  • @devonlord99
    @devonlord99 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    My face brightened up when I saw Australia pop up near the end.

    • @Le-kb5wu
      @Le-kb5wu 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Get ready for the Emu war 0.2

  • @ГверифайдИС
    @ГверифайдИС 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Its funny how Italy always been somewhere in the middle then for a second it goes completely down and that second is ww2 😂

  • @entertainmentjoke2871
    @entertainmentjoke2871 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    USA: SPENT so much but fails to stabilise Afghanistan.

    • @abiniz
      @abiniz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Point is to keep it going for the longest time… that way everyone makes / spends more money & deplete enemies resources.. (in the Afghanistan case the resources would be the second best quality opioid/heroin in the world) a shit ton of it

    • @entertainmentjoke2871
      @entertainmentjoke2871 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @e93 USA lapdog bot

    • @fashistz
      @fashistz 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Два ботинка пара ))))

    • @ernestogastelum9123
      @ernestogastelum9123 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@entertainmentjoke2871 that was on the Afghanistan's. the US spend countless of years to train the Afghan police and military to defend their country and the moment we left they coward to the Taliban and didnt put up a fight. Afghans dont deserve to be saved if they dont care to protect their own country

  • @tuckerhiggins4336
    @tuckerhiggins4336 3 ปีที่แล้ว +70

    USA: Unlimitied POOOOOWAH!

  • @chioptnstdr3448
    @chioptnstdr3448 3 ปีที่แล้ว +53

    Love the music choice for this one 👍🏽

    • @RankingCharts
      @RankingCharts  3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I’m glad you enjoyed!

    • @pizzauchiha1584
      @pizzauchiha1584 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RankingCharts might be way out into left field, but did you happen to get this music choice by watching Terra formars? 👀

  • @darrinscott6612
    @darrinscott6612 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Japan in 1941: Bombs the US
    The US economy: 4:28
    Japan: [chuckles] I'm in danger.

    • @xenondestiny
      @xenondestiny 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Germany: what's your next move japan?
      Japan: well the U.S. took our oil trade so we're bombing them
      Germany: maybe not do that?
      Japan: already did
      Germany: YOU WHAT?!?!

    • @lantech7709
      @lantech7709 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah it didn't turn out well for them lol

  • @adudeontheinterweb6571
    @adudeontheinterweb6571 3 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    world war: starts*
    US: gonna have to show off here for a moment

    • @pillmill8987
      @pillmill8987 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      America: We need more death machines!
      Ford and DuPont: Hold my beer.

    • @DarkMatterX1
      @DarkMatterX1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@pillmill8987
      That...that's what war is

    • @protorhinocerator142
      @protorhinocerator142 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      "Fine. I'll do it myself."

  • @sagarjha7456
    @sagarjha7456 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    India -pak war 1971 created a new country and it was not even worth mentioning 👍👍

    • @nixenvines007
      @nixenvines007 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Your prime minister is wasting money
      First make toilets
      Give jammu and kashmir to Pakistan
      Give east India to china
      Give South India to south indians
      That's it

    • @satwikkumar6283
      @satwikkumar6283 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@nixenvines007 assuming that you are from Pokistan. Eradicate polio form your country first(Pokistan and Afghanistan [which is a war zone] are the only 2 places in the world where polio still exists). And for your kind information polio spread from open defecation that means Pokistan needs to build more toilets. So stop wasting your money on terrorism.

    • @adeelqadir6517
      @adeelqadir6517 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@satwikkumar6283 Go fix your corona problem first and then come back to troll other countries for no reason.

    • @satwikkumar6283
      @satwikkumar6283 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@adeelqadir6517 its not as bad as pokistan now

    • @adeelqadir6517
      @adeelqadir6517 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@satwikkumar6283 nope its still worse your no2 in corona cases mr propoganda boy

  • @hilkmeister1382
    @hilkmeister1382 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    In my lover of history opinion the US’s spending mainly results from 2 ideas: 1) The US should never fight a war on American soil and 2) we need to have the flexibility to use something other than nukes for when someone (mainly the USSR when this was developed developed) does something we don’t like. A lot of the spending also comes from the inefficiencies of the American military system, we got 3/4 separate armies in the different branches (Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines) which all need separate equipment that needs separate development which costs a lot (which is why the pentagon loves wasting money on universal designs for everyone). It also doesn’t help that the US is fighting a war somewhere since Vietnam. This is why military spending is always so high and is partially why the US is sooooo in debt (the other big contributor is Healthcare, bailouts [which is actually related to national security more than not since companies like GM are the ones whose factories we would use to fight a major war] and other such stimulus which we can’t pay for but politicians love passing because it makes them look good).

  • @griffintribe4186
    @griffintribe4186 3 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    Everyone: NOOOO you can't just spend billions on military equipment and spend more money than us
    US: HAHAHA money go brrrrrr

  • @TheDimistron
    @TheDimistron 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Seeing some "everyone gangsta until Germany rises top again" comments
    Thinking well now Germany is top 3 again (Ukraine war)

  • @AlecMader
    @AlecMader 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Russia was promoted to moderator
    Russia has left the chat
    *Soviet Union has join-*
    *Soviet Union was promoted to admin*

    • @Mc__Nugget
      @Mc__Nugget 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      *Soviet Union was banned*

    • @legendaryevan4670
      @legendaryevan4670 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      America Has been Promted to Server Owner

  • @eetulehtinen7304
    @eetulehtinen7304 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    When You realize USA could explore the whole space with that military spending.

    • @vincentdesun
      @vincentdesun 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Or fund some actual public health care program, or build some highspeed rail like China did.

    • @5n.k.l.312
      @5n.k.l.312 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@vincentdesun well we have joe biden in office so don't expect anything

    • @onurvx5996
      @onurvx5996 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@5n.k.l.312 Candidate Trump = Chad.

    • @miso306
      @miso306 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@vincentdesun the thing is the US already spends more on health care than any other country (5x the military budget), but it's just done awfully. The problem isn't the amount of money but how it's spent

    • @erniebuchinski3614
      @erniebuchinski3614 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I agree and I think that all military spending to defend Europe should be cut. I live in Europe (probably the same country as you likely do based on your name, in Helsinki), and wonder why so many European countries depend on the US for military protection, yet so many of their citizens go on and on about how much the US spends on the military. (I'm aware that Finland is not a member of NATO, and also of the history with the USSR and the Nazis.) In general, I believe that many Americans are of the opinion that European countries, in general, can feel free to pay for their own defence any time that they wish. Then there'd likely be plenty of money to explore space.

  • @deathIeaf
    @deathIeaf 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I like how there’s a massive bass drum hit in the music when 1911 rolls around (WW1).

  • @nicolopes3022
    @nicolopes3022 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Americans: The USA is number one.
    European and Asian and Middle Eastern: We have been at war for 1,000 years.
    Not that 300 years. 🇫🇷🇪🇦🇵🇹🇩🇪🇮🇹🇯🇵🇹🇷🇮🇳🇬🇷🇬🇧🇸🇪🇸🇯 > 🇨🇳🇮🇷🇺🇸🇷🇺

    • @xer0143
      @xer0143 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Tf are you on about

  • @julesdavid7268
    @julesdavid7268 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The reason why USSR collapsed was not because of the military expenses but fundamentally because it was to developed for it could be managed by few thousand of bureaucrats.
    The USSR had the opportunity to become greater if the PLANIFICATION was democratically managed by the entire working class itself.

  • @Goblin749
    @Goblin749 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    As a European, looking at America's military is like looking at superman. Thank God his on my side... For now.

    • @rafimuhammadzakaria482
      @rafimuhammadzakaria482 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      But seriously, Europeans need to grow a pair and start spending their mandatory 2%.

    • @phrime5627
      @phrime5627 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      As a European I feel safer with a Allie like Russia. Spening less and still stronger lol

    • @Bignfluffy
      @Bignfluffy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Why tf do you think europe sees america as an allie?

    • @drsex6667
      @drsex6667 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rafimuhammadzakaria482 not really since we haven’t been fully involved in every war since the 1940’s

    • @allencurtis9600
      @allencurtis9600 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Bignfluffy idk maybe all the joint training and joint deployments? Or joint spending? Or shared bases?

  • @angryyordle4640
    @angryyordle4640 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    American people: „we…need…food…“
    American politicians: „shut up, we need another thousand nukes“

    • @YHaTToY
      @YHaTToY 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nobody will stop you from growing plants

    • @angryyordle4640
      @angryyordle4640 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@YHaTToY ah yes, the first triggered american arrived

    • @legoeater6920
      @legoeater6920 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@angryyordle4640 lol

    • @blackhole9961
      @blackhole9961 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@angryyordle4640 America produces more food than any other country on the planet, and practically no one dies from malnourishment.

    • @angryyordle4640
      @angryyordle4640 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@blackhole9961 you're taking this way too literally

  • @cazador7131
    @cazador7131 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Start of the video: yeah that's wrong
    End of the video: yeah, seems accurate

    • @fashistz
      @fashistz 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Мне кажется наоборот

  • @vindiesel682
    @vindiesel682 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The US didn’t realize the Cold War was over

    • @sergeypopov801
      @sergeypopov801 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      well actually as we see it's never ended

    • @Mautiks
      @Mautiks 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because it’s not over… China was not yet properly humbled…

  • @ctggames320
    @ctggames320 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    This was very fun to watch great video

    • @RankingCharts
      @RankingCharts  3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I’m glad you enjoyed! Stay tuned for more!

  • @eliaswilliamsson8553
    @eliaswilliamsson8553 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    US: spends 700 billion dollars on military
    Sweden: haha submarine goes "..."

    • @randomeastasian347
      @randomeastasian347 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Also Sweden: relies on US support and equipments.

    • @karlkoller5308
      @karlkoller5308 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@randomeastasian347
      lol

  • @TTGHAST
    @TTGHAST 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    So basically the U.S is at Cold War levels of military spending nonstop since the 80ies, and rising.

    • @aeric257
      @aeric257 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      To be fair, the cold war isn't over, the participants have changed and one side is severely underestimating the other.

    • @JimFrenowsky
      @JimFrenowsky 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That’s the cost of hegemony honestly. The US maintains six times as many carrier strike groups as the next country. 5 times as many aircraft. It’s not about be able to defend yourself when you’re trying to maintain hegemony. It’s also not even about deterring attacks. It’s about deterring even the THOUGHT. And that’s a very expensive strategy. But holy shit, it’s effective.
      Those decades of insane spending have ensured that US military technology, and sheer firepower, will remain hegemonic well into the 22nd century.

    • @matthew8153
      @matthew8153 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JimFrenowsky
      But only so long as the US doesn’t collapse under its own weight.