Military Spending by Country | 1830-2022

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 มี.ค. 2023
  • This video ranks the top 15 countries in the world by military spending per year from 1830 to 2022. Spending is calculated in US dollars and is not adjusted for inflation.
    *
    *
    *
    Source: ourworldindata, SIPRI
    Music: Hearts of Iron IV
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 3.1K

  • @gozhdaa
    @gozhdaa  ปีที่แล้ว +1030

    1833-1840 Carlist War
    1839-1842 First Opium War
    1846-1848 Mexican-American War
    1853-1856 Crimean War
    1861-1865 American Civil War
    1866 Austro-Prussian War
    1870-1871 Franco-Prussian War
    1877-1878 Russo-Turkish War
    1898-1899 Spanish-American War
    1904-1905 Russo-Japanese War
    1910-1919 Mexican Border War
    1912-1913 Balkan Wars
    1914-1918 World War I
    1917-1922 Russian Civil War
    1927-1949 Chinese Civil War
    1937-1945 Second Sino-Japanese War
    1939-1945 World War II
    1947-1991 Cold War
    1950-1953 Korean War
    1955-1975 Vietnam War
    1980-1988 Iran-Iraq War
    1990-1991 Gulf War
    2003-2011 Iraq War
    2001-Present War on Terror
    2022-2023 Russo-Ukrainian War

    • @jammin5563
      @jammin5563 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      Can you give me a prediction on how much russias budget went up between 2022-2023

    • @doncomuna378
      @doncomuna378 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      1864-1870 Paraguay War

    • @leandrospimpolo7439
      @leandrospimpolo7439 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@doncomuna378 esqueceram e ficou bem fora o grafico em

    • @doncomuna378
      @doncomuna378 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@leandrospimpolo7439 Fora ou foda?

    • @ivoleser
      @ivoleser ปีที่แล้ว +83

      2014-2023 Russo-Ukrainian War

  • @hailexiao2770
    @hailexiao2770 ปีที่แล้ว +1108

    The Soviet Union spending $300 billion on defense in 1985 is insane. As a % of GDP, that's like USA or China spending $3.5 trillion on defense in 2023.

    • @yawnbob
      @yawnbob ปีที่แล้ว +66

      Это СССР коммунизм вперед

    • @insomnia20422
      @insomnia20422 ปีที่แล้ว +174

      They were literally printing tanks at some point.

    • @canadaphil6068
      @canadaphil6068 ปีที่แล้ว +275

      One of the major reasons they bankrupted themselves while their people lived in 1 room apartments with a communal bathroom and stood in line each day for stale bread.

    • @SirEggo2412
      @SirEggo2412 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +268

      @@pumaa8416 if the USSR was so good why do majority of the eastern bloc never want to go back and tell me who ran to what side of Berlin when the wall fell?

    • @cadennorris960
      @cadennorris960 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +133

      @@pumaa8416You’re lying to yourself. My house is made of hardie board, stucko and rebar. My roof is secured to the foundation. Every new home in my area has to be made up to a certain code set by the county. Houses around the country vary greatly. If the USSR was so great why did it collapse? Just face it, your military spent more than it should have on a futile effort and we saw the results of that in 1991. Of course that’s not the only reason the USSR collapsed.

  • @lepage7120
    @lepage7120 ปีที่แล้ว +477

    800 billion dollars. Can you smell it? That smell of democracy

    • @n1gtwhisper158
      @n1gtwhisper158 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      I dont think the budget has technically increased for a long while if you factor in inflation.

    • @serrael-182
      @serrael-182 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      Yes cuz democracy lets you have this kind of economy that allowes those numbers.

    • @jctr4307
      @jctr4307 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Democracy is not peace. Don't be a child 😅

    • @donaldtrumplover2254
      @donaldtrumplover2254 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Hail Democracy!!!!!!

    • @A_Steam_User
      @A_Steam_User 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      *helldivers 2 intensifies*

  • @titanx8199
    @titanx8199 ปีที่แล้ว +374

    You know germany is up to something when their military budget explodes 😂😂😂😊

    • @ismailsancak3652
      @ismailsancak3652 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      jews are crying

    • @Big_Caesar1
      @Big_Caesar1 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ismailsancak3652 You're sick

    • @Arragon97
      @Arragon97 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@ismailsancak3652Israel sells weapons to Germany, I think they are happy Germanys higher budget.

    • @oerlikon20mm29
      @oerlikon20mm29 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@ismailsancak3652when are they not?

    • @83nitish
      @83nitish 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

      In 21st century Germany is nothing more than a US puppy. Those days are long gone and not coming back trust me.

  • @SebHaarfagre
    @SebHaarfagre ปีที่แล้ว +342

    First of all, I love that the HoI3/4 soundtrack is used.
    Secondly, ridiculous how well it fits dynamically with the graphs?!?
    Third, as a history nerd, this is simply the best

    • @bunkerkorpf1440
      @bunkerkorpf1440 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      History nerd ?
      Kingdom of France in 1853 ? LMAO

    • @Joebinlaggin513
      @Joebinlaggin513 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@bunkerkorpf1440Kingdom of France ended in 1870 after the Franco-Prussian war

    • @Joebinlaggin513
      @Joebinlaggin513 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So if you don’t believe that there was a kingdom of france in 1853 then you’re wrong

    • @bunkerkorpf1440
      @bunkerkorpf1440 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Joebinlaggin513 There was no Kingdom of France in 1853 or 1870, youre ignorant.
      It was the Second Empire held by Napoleon III, a totally different thing.

    • @steveweidig5373
      @steveweidig5373 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@bunkerkorpf1440 French empire would be more correct since Napoleon III was an emperor, not a king. Napoleon III choose the title of emperor over king because "King" (or "Roi" in French) has been a very unpopular title ever since the French Revolution, but otherwise was a bog-standard monarchy of the time.
      Simply leaving the country as France (outside of the Vichy regime) would have avoided this and would technically been correct, too.

  • @pahtar7189
    @pahtar7189 ปีที่แล้ว +942

    These dynamic graphs are much more useful when you note major events within the video. For example starting in 1859 the US undergoes a meteoric rise then plumets after 1866. It's due to the Civil War of course, but many of the dramatic changes aren't so obvious - at least to me.

    • @Yegoros
      @Yegoros ปีที่แล้ว +9

      1986 - Chernobyl in USSR, after that in 87 you see it that spendings in USSR began to rapidly decrease

    • @losarpettystrakos7687
      @losarpettystrakos7687 ปีที่แล้ว +65

      @@Yegoros It has nothing to do with Chernobyl. In mid 80s the Soviet Economy was already in shambles and the crisis started to accelerate rapidly.

    • @Yegoros
      @Yegoros ปีที่แล้ว +19

      ​@@losarpettystrakos7687 Yes, it was in crisis in mid-80s. But you don't know communists. They will never decrease spending on the army unless something serious happens. And this serious was Chornobyl. Total loss from this catastrophe is more than 250 bln usd in today's money

    • @le_meme_man8983
      @le_meme_man8983 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@Yegoros Sure. Believe what you want

    • @Yegoros
      @Yegoros ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@le_meme_man8983 that's what ppl say when they have no arguments)

  • @bifa5414
    @bifa5414 ปีที่แล้ว +353

    5:55 I like how after WWII Poland jumped straight into 3rd place

    • @oskich7758
      @oskich7758 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Yes, how

    • @bifa5414
      @bifa5414 ปีที่แล้ว +68

      @@oskich7758 Because it didn't exist during war (it was occupied by Soviet Union and Germany) so after it was brought back it was spending huge portion of GDP on military. Which is interesting considering that it wasn't a totally free country for over 200 years

    • @atanasvasilev3228
      @atanasvasilev3228 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thats what oppression does to people- maxes the army and economy.

    • @okand1921
      @okand1921 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      ​@@bifa5414 It was in Warsaw pact which explains military spendings)

    • @pootmcgoot5458
      @pootmcgoot5458 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @RyanMiller-tb6fd thats post ww2 my dude

  • @ashhathaway4144
    @ashhathaway4144 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +190

    It's interesting to note that Soviet military spending surpassed the United States in 1969, and remained significantly higher throughout the 1970s. The Carter and Reagan military build-ups are noticeable in the late 1970s and into the 1980s. Excellent graphs, thank you for posting this!

    • @Ravie3
      @Ravie3 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Soviets spending more than they could afford.

    • @foreignfat6009
      @foreignfat6009 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      ​@@Ravie3Nonsense, they fell due to political pressure, not economical. Stop this misinformation..
      By your logic North Korea should have fallen a long time ago. Soviet citizen definitely had it better than North Korean have it now. Even starving Ukrainians had it better.

    • @derpidius6306
      @derpidius6306 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@foreignfat6009 North Korea is propped up by China, if China wasn't holding their hand NK would collapse even without an external invasion

    • @GareBear420
      @GareBear420 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      @@foreignfat6009 I wonder what could have possibly contributed to the large amount of political pressure placed on the soviet regime... Definitely not anything to do with the appalling economic conditions most of the soviet citizenry found themselves in.

    • @foreignfat6009
      @foreignfat6009 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@GareBear420 Maybe ridiculous amount of ethnicity and different religion? And different cultures, which were suppressed. You are forgetting that Soviet Union was union of mostly poor countries. Russia was pretty much the richest and that doesn't say much after WW1, civil wars and ww2. It was impressive what they did with a poor ruin.
      Again, North Korea has worse conditions for their people than most Soviet union and it didn't collapse out of economic pressure. And they won't. They need military coup or outside intervention to collapse. They don't have to deal with so much diversity.
      If USA swapped places geographically, they wouldn't be a superpower. USA had huge economic issues, and it didn't collapse. USA had way less diversity than Soviet union.

  • @zacharymoye7272
    @zacharymoye7272 ปีที่แล้ว +173

    Damn, France kicked serious ass for nearly a century 😳.

    • @Zx17OPv57i
      @Zx17OPv57i ปีที่แล้ว +83

      France was the best for long time

    • @ryanhampson673
      @ryanhampson673 ปีที่แล้ว +63

      France was the strongest land army in Europe for hundred of years. They catch a lot of flak for surrendering during WW2 but they lost 92,000 troops in a matter of months and were just over run.

    • @user-hz2eh3iq1f
      @user-hz2eh3iq1f ปีที่แล้ว +5

      ​@@ryanhampson673 this is not an excuse SOViet Union lost 27, 000, 000

    • @ryanhampson673
      @ryanhampson673 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

      @@user-hz2eh3iq1f True, but lack of good Soviet commanders at the start didn’t help. Stalin purged all the good officers because he was a paranoid maniac. But as an American I do understand the great sacrifice the Soviets undertook…With huge amounts of American food and equipment to help.

    • @Scriptvm
      @Scriptvm 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      Nous étions jadis un grand et beau pays..

  • @stevejones4010
    @stevejones4010 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    Brilliant video and music as always, thanks 👍

    • @ayazhuma4511
      @ayazhuma4511 ปีที่แล้ว

      Fake knowledge 😂😂 channel
      World no1 usa

    • @alexanderegger5418
      @alexanderegger5418 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      bro no english?
      @@ayazhuma4511

  • @Zopiexx
    @Zopiexx ปีที่แล้ว +739

    The Soviet Union had the lead for quite a while

    • @ltmammaguerillz6745
      @ltmammaguerillz6745 ปีที่แล้ว

      We just weren't dick swinging for the moon cuz we weren't being pressed. Don't F with America, you watch what happens in any world war when America joins

    • @doncomuna378
      @doncomuna378 ปีที่แล้ว +74

      The USSR already had a lot of weapons before the war, so they didn't have to spend that much.

    • @ltmammaguerillz6745
      @ltmammaguerillz6745 ปีที่แล้ว +80

      ​@Terror do Ocidente old weapons, tech is always improving and R&D innovation is why countries who stop spending fall way behind on the global scale. Seems like USA decided to conquer the planet in like 1988 and juiced the spending to like $275 billion a year and it never went down after that just straight climbed to almost a trillion dollars from then till now.

    • @doncomuna378
      @doncomuna378 ปีที่แล้ว +60

      @@ltmammaguerillz6745 The Americans realized that even though they were the number 1 power, they still weren't able to defeat half of a country that was fighting with Russian AK 47 rifles, wearing slippers, and a "drum cymbal" on their head. After the embarrassment, they started to invest madly in their armed forces, not only to displace Socialist Russia, but also to not make the same mistakes!

    • @hamzamahmood9565
      @hamzamahmood9565 ปีที่แล้ว +91

      ​@@doncomuna378 Losing the political will to fight is not same as an outright military defeat. America decided it was worth keeping Japan, S.Korea and Western Europe after WW2, so we stayed. America decided it wasn't worth keeping Vietnam, Afghanistan or Iraq, so we left.

  • @creanero
    @creanero ปีที่แล้ว +120

    The brief appearance of what should be the Irish Free State (instead of the Republic of Ireland, a term that wasn't used until 1948) on this chart says something about how absurdly expensive the civil war was.

    • @johnwayne7673
      @johnwayne7673 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      I was there ...the price of a pint back then I'll tell you something

    • @user-gd1bx8te9n
      @user-gd1bx8te9n 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      خلاصه جمهوری اسلامی ایران داره بر اسرائیل پیروز میشه . نیروی های روشنایی پیروز میدان هستند

    • @kodiwtf
      @kodiwtf 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@johnwayne7673 Can't imagine the price of a pint back in the 50s or 60s cost more, course getting the money for it would be tough. How much was it do you remember?

  • @AmmarAlshomali
    @AmmarAlshomali ปีที่แล้ว +79

    When the soviet union collapsed but still the United States didn't stop spending...

    • @engineerenginering8633
      @engineerenginering8633 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Why would they stop? And a lot of it has to do with inflation too.

    • @Septimus_ii
      @Septimus_ii 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      In real terms it decreased, but not massively

    • @LB-jw3ly
      @LB-jw3ly 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Defense contractors didn’t collapse.

    • @falcon_224
      @falcon_224 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@Septimus_iiUS dollars value hasn't depreciated that much in the past 30 years

    • @sonikUk
      @sonikUk หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      China...

  • @richierollinrocket2891
    @richierollinrocket2891 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    US defense budget whenever there is a war: I am speed

  • @theIroncane
    @theIroncane 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The most entertaining and captivating video I've ever watched 😅

  • @Sans_K5
    @Sans_K5 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    thanks for making this video so wonderful❤️🔥

  • @victorbroquart693
    @victorbroquart693 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    In 1856, there is no French kingdom, we were ruled by Napoleon III, the Second Empire, after Napoleon was elected as the first French president democratically elected, he declared the empire one year later.

    • @SebHaarfagre
      @SebHaarfagre ปีที่แล้ว +4

      There's an animation between each year. For simplicity (for the eyes), it might be better this way

    • @Chriswaddle77
      @Chriswaddle77 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@Коля Красоткин oui comme Poutine

    • @testmaxfad
      @testmaxfad 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@user-ct9sj3rh8p Гитлер НЕ пришел к власти на демократических выборах. Он получил место рейхсканцлера благодаря коррупционному скандалу, связанным с сука-сыночкой Гинденбурга, а партия НСДАП не получила большинства мест в парламенте, чтобы принимать решения без оглядки на другие партии. НСДАП вместо демократических процедур просто убивали депутатов других партий, ввели антиконституционный запрет на коммунистическую партию, и ввели антиконституционные законы, ограничивающие права и свободы граждан. НСДАП и Гитлер сломали демократические институты, они к своей абсолютной власти на выборах НЕ приходили - они власть ЗАХВАТИЛИ. Формально во время ВМВ у Германского рейха была конституция, гарантирующая права и свободы граждан, но НСДАП просто ее игнорировали.

    • @Rex_87
      @Rex_87 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@Chriswaddle77👌thx

    • @bunkerkorpf1440
      @bunkerkorpf1440 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      1852 and after, not 1856

  • @user-sy1ei5mn2l
    @user-sy1ei5mn2l ปีที่แล้ว +204

    I love how accurate the flags are

    • @tintin323
      @tintin323 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Is this ironic ?

    • @cloroxbleach9222
      @cloroxbleach9222 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      There are inaccuracies, the Ottoman Empire is it the most obvious one and another one is Austria-Hungary which more commonly used the black and gold flag Habsburg flag.
      It's still a lot better than other videos which just use modern flags and names though.

    • @yeetienusmagnus4460
      @yeetienusmagnus4460 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      bruh wtf happened to the Belgian flag

    • @Naiko-tekinaShinjukukumin
      @Naiko-tekinaShinjukukumin ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Japan's Flag during it's empire is inaccurate. The flag shown there is the Imperial Japanese Army and Navy flags. It is still used today. The corrrect flag is the same flag as modern Japan.

    • @asdasasada722
      @asdasasada722 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tintin323 weimar republic = germany for example..it isnt

  • @sonikUk
    @sonikUk หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    France🇫🇷 France🇫🇷France🇫🇷 and France 🇫🇷🤣 At the top of the leaderboard for 90% of the video. This is not surprising for the country that has won the most battles in human history. They have a high military culture and top technology.

  • @DataDiveCH
    @DataDiveCH ปีที่แล้ว +4

    It was great. Keep going👍

  • @USViper
    @USViper ปีที่แล้ว +39

    1943, America put a twin turbo on the defense budget and looked in rear view

    • @1blackice1
      @1blackice1 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      That was when America made war into a business.

    • @USViper
      @USViper ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @1blackice1 War is a business in EVERY country... there is money in war. Just like Krupp steel company ww2

    • @omniyambot9876
      @omniyambot9876 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      you don't mess with a country with military industrial complex or you'll learn why they don't have healthcare for asserting freedom😁

    • @walmars3curity
      @walmars3curity หลายเดือนก่อน

      What was it before?

  • @dylanhoeltzel
    @dylanhoeltzel ปีที่แล้ว +371

    Soviet Union:OK usa I'm out you can stop spending
    Usa:Eh,no thanks
    😂😂😂😂
    Edit: Holy cow that's a lot of likes
    Edit 2:There's a war in the replies 💀

    • @danilos38
      @danilos38 ปีที่แล้ว +107

      Однополярный мир полсе 1991 года , США контролировать начали всю планету в том числе за счёт баз НАТО по всему миру , а на это нужно много средств тратить . Весь мир после 1991 года колония США

    • @JimzieUSAball
      @JimzieUSAball ปีที่แล้ว +62

      @@danilos38 Can’t defeat Ukraine??

    • @legocon2004
      @legocon2004 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      @@danilos38 В чем дело, Иван, с ума ты проигрываешь?

    • @JoeXOTic
      @JoeXOTic ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@JimzieUSAball it's a war of attrition to the western resources. Russia can make rockets rain on ukraine if they wanted to end it.

    • @JoeXOTic
      @JoeXOTic ปีที่แล้ว +13

      ​@@danilos38 true

  • @eric.1948
    @eric.1948 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    We need a video of total gdp towards military i think that explains more.

  • @flankana
    @flankana ปีที่แล้ว +6

    can we get a navy size comparison?

  • @Ankitcse913
    @Ankitcse913 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    UK's Budget instantly Increased after capturing INDIA (which was world's 25% GDP)

    • @vatsal7640
      @vatsal7640 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bro uk already had an massive military budget before the conquest.
      What do you think Britain was able to conquer india in the fitst place

    • @sohenmondal5471
      @sohenmondal5471 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@vatsal7640 here comes the brown sepoy . This is not conlony age .

    • @vatsal7640
      @vatsal7640 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@sohenmondal5471 here comes another indian nationalist who thinks everybody with different opinion is a sepoy.
      Bruh seriously when will you guys grow up??

    • @indiafirst3676
      @indiafirst3676 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@vatsal7640 India back in the 19th century was divided into several kingdoms and hence it was easy to conquer fragmented kingdoms one by one which is what Brits did. Had India been unified then it would never had been directly colonized. India's situation would have been something like China in the 'Century of Humiliation'

    • @vatsal7640
      @vatsal7640 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​​@@indiafirst3676agreed, but India would have still lost.

  • @randallidell7027
    @randallidell7027 ปีที่แล้ว +182

    It's crazy how quickly the US can dwarf other nations in military spending when we gear up for war.

    • @Messerschmitt_BF_109G_10
      @Messerschmitt_BF_109G_10 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      In just 10 seconds, 1:28 - 1:38, we went from like $140,000,000 to $2.3 BILLION

    • @brettk9316
      @brettk9316 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      🇺🇸 💪 being rich helps 🤑 💰

    • @T.Hebert
      @T.Hebert ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@Messerschmitt_BF_109G_10 A civil war does that to you I guess

    • @AndrewJ9673
      @AndrewJ9673 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      one of the difficult questions in history is when specifically the United States became a Great Power and when they became a "Superpower". I usually look at the history of the Civil War and argue that if there was ever a point where the US was considered one of the strongest countries on Earth, then it must be before the Civil War, because the amount mobilized for a *civil war* and not even a war against another major power was insane, and dwarfs a lot of the rest of the world.

    • @TheJollyKraut
      @TheJollyKraut ปีที่แล้ว

      @@brettk9316 You aren't rich. It's all bought with debts. Debts that your grandchildren will have to pay off...

  • @anthony9thompson
    @anthony9thompson 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Why do I find this so exciting to watch ?

  • @simonsonne4741
    @simonsonne4741 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Everyone is "war over let's stop spending so much on our military" USA: "hold my beer"

  • @FyL43
    @FyL43 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    France is pretty stable all the time, but we can see that it never manages to adapt quickly enough compared to other countries

    • @Bracus.Reghusk
      @Bracus.Reghusk 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      False just study the use of new equipment during the First World War.

    • @roronoazoro2970
      @roronoazoro2970 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Bracus.Reghuskhow does the implementation of new equipment in a single war have to do with their defense budget throughout the past 200 years?? You’re talking about apples when the other dude is talking about oranges 😂

    • @Bracus.Reghusk
      @Bracus.Reghusk 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      @@roronoazoro2970 The use of new equipment come the implementation of new strategies and organisation just study This is a fascinating subject, and it shows that the French army has been at the forefront of innovation and adaptation, the basic comment is just either bad faith or ignorance.

    • @xxdarkphoenixxx1
      @xxdarkphoenixxx1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@roronoazoro2970 In fact you can learn how the french modify the army mobility between 14 and 18. They just blow away the standard of the time

  • @amin368
    @amin368 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    UK 1948: Poland what hell are you doing
    Poland: sorry I'm going back now

    • @user-nm6sp1eg5o
      @user-nm6sp1eg5o 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Poland was totally destroyed and had to rebuild itself without any foreign help.

    • @Septimus_ii
      @Septimus_ii 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@user-nm6sp1eg5o In 1948 they had an awful lot of Soviet 'help'. Nothing from their supposed allies in the West, though :(

    • @Pospolite-Ruszenie
      @Pospolite-Ruszenie 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The west wanted to help, but the Soviets refuses. That’s also why Poland didn’t get any financial reparations from Germany. The Soviets didn’t allow it.

    • @koulematon7359
      @koulematon7359 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@Septimus_iiIt was the Soviets that rejected the Marshall Plan for us. They thought Lenin magic would be enough, and it wasn't.

  • @jtjt210
    @jtjt210 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is great and fascinating, is this military or army budget? Certain nations back in the day probably relied much more on their navy (and perhaps later, Air Force)?

    • @kospencer1
      @kospencer1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I think it’s not limited to army, no way Britain spending that much money on land army in the late 19th century.

    • @jtjt210
      @jtjt210 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@kospencer1 My thought too

  • @maximshakhov284
    @maximshakhov284 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very interesting. Where have you got information about military budget amounts?

    • @puffodmuff3981
      @puffodmuff3981 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      he just made it up

  • @becalelbecalelew7262
    @becalelbecalelew7262 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    То есть по видео получается, что процентально относительно годов военные расходы СССР в довоенные годы и военные почти не отличаются? Серьёзно?

  • @gamerreloadedofficial4465
    @gamerreloadedofficial4465 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    France hit different

  • @mehmetuysal163
    @mehmetuysal163 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    can you do re- calc fto inflation like 200 mil in 1880s but how much 200 mil cost in 2023?

  • @Cruor34
    @Cruor34 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is this music from HOI 4 or is it just free use music?

  • @Ankitcse913
    @Ankitcse913 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    UK's Budget decreased instantly when INDIA got Independant😂

    • @vatsal7640
      @vatsal7640 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oh god another indian natinalist.
      You can clearly see the numbers growing, not decreasing even after India's independence

    • @priyashmukherjee
      @priyashmukherjee 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​​@@vatsal7640OH GOD ANOTHER INDIAN HATER. PROUD TO BE AN INDIAN NATIONALIST.

    • @vatsal7640
      @vatsal7640 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@priyashmukherjee cringe af. And who said I was an indian hater??

  • @KrauserAMG
    @KrauserAMG 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +268

    Russia's army budget is several times smaller than that of the United States, but at the same time Russia holds the status of the 2nd army in the world in power. Just imagine what Russia would do with the US budget 💀

    • @undefined7704
      @undefined7704 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +61

      ты же понимаешь что она считаеться второй армией мира из-за количества населения и ядерного оружия в первую очередь ?

    • @KrauserAMG
      @KrauserAMG 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +68

      @@undefined7704 ну вообще запад очень часто восхищался своей техникой и постоянно говорил как она сокрушит Россию при войне, тем самым пытаясь поставить Россию "на место" . А оказалось, что дорогая техника запада не справляется с дешёвыми, немного улучшенными танками СССР. А если говорить про дисциплину то в России она очевидно лучше. Ядерные ракеты ты вообще можешь не включать в военную силу, их все равно никто не применит.

    • @affdafwfwa
      @affdafwfwa 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +140

      2nd army in the world in power yet can't even win against Ukraine LMFAO

    • @WUNDER_BUILDER
      @WUNDER_BUILDER 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +91

      ​@@affdafwfwawithout NATO help, Ukrain would lost in month. Without starlink and NATO satellits and artillery and ect, they cant defeat Russia

    • @Ya_Tut_Ne_Pri_Chem
      @Ya_Tut_Ne_Pri_Chem 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

      @@affdafwfwa I could be wrong, but the entire Russian army is not at war with Ukraine, only part of the 2nd army of the world is located there

  • @tusharsharma1363
    @tusharsharma1363 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    When the music starts at 5:15 and it intensifies at 5:25
    ☠️☠️☠️

  • @Ltasty
    @Ltasty ปีที่แล้ว +185

    Would also be interesting to see this adjusted with PPP. In US dollars alone it doesn't give a true representation of military expenditure. China and Russia's for example is likely at least double when you consider PPP.

    • @matrioxraven1929
      @matrioxraven1929 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Se hace en dolares para ver el gasto real de todos por igual

    • @AbdulGoodLooks
      @AbdulGoodLooks ปีที่แล้ว +61

      I totally agree, but Purchasing Power Parity is calculated using consumer goods.
      It doesn't really tell us how much cheaper military equipment, personnel, and research are for other countries vs the US.
      We would probably need a different metric to properly compare them.

    • @Ltasty
      @Ltasty ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@AbdulGoodLooks you're still going to get a far better representation using PPP than you are merely using dollars.

    • @marcusgarveyson
      @marcusgarveyson ปีที่แล้ว

      🇺🇸 military spending is equal to money laundering . it hasn't made the us military 10x more powerful than Afghanistan a country thats not even in the top 10

    • @Aduysvmncmkouyf
      @Aduysvmncmkouyf ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Ltasty gdp

  • @drrizzla4557
    @drrizzla4557 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    just a detail but from 1852 to 1870 France was named "Second Empire" and not "Kingdom" anymore (even if the Second Empire is considered as a parliamentary monarchy)

    • @dontcare5319
      @dontcare5319 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah and from 1848 to 1852 it was the second french republic

  • @TheDanielprze
    @TheDanielprze หลายเดือนก่อน

    Where is Poland? 26mld EUR 2022... based on which data you prepared this dynamic chart?😮

  • @a.gallardo4321
    @a.gallardo4321 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Where do you even get the data for the Grand Duchy of Tuscany

  • @Romanball5677
    @Romanball5677 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks for making the vedio also I change my name

  • @sof5858
    @sof5858 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    It would have been interesting to split the US with Confederacy during the Civil War.

    • @user-ti6xm4rz4f
      @user-ti6xm4rz4f 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      лучше,чтоб америка исчезла.

    • @davidlucas5550
      @davidlucas5550 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@user-ti6xm4rz4fЧестно говоря, вы завидуете, вы ненавидите США только потому, что они номер 1, честно говоря, я мечтаю, чтобы Россия и США заставили Китай и все остальное исчезнуть, а я бразилец, в моей стране полно коммунистов, вот таких ослов , ты знаешь? Они не такие, как Путин, который любит свою страну, люди здесь все разрушают, убивают экономику, у них нет даже хорошего военного планирования, поэтому мне бы очень хотелось быть на стороне России и США, если Если бы Трамп был у власти в США, было бы несколько соглашений, как и у них, и сделали бы больше..

    • @user-ti6xm4rz4f
      @user-ti6xm4rz4f 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davidlucas5550 ,вот честно,никакой зависти к Америке или еще к какой стране вообще нет у россиян,честно-всем пофиг.Пофиг,это когда безразлично,когда ты не думаешь об этом.Америка-международный бандит,страна,которая несет горе и войны по всей планете.Поэтому Америку ненавидит большая половина человечества.Кстати,в России Бразилию любят,у нас есть юмористический фильм"Здравствуйте,я ваша тетя"Там богатая тетушка приехала из Бразилии,где много диких обезьян"😁,и теперь большинство россиян так и думают,что обезьяна-ваше основное животное😁Ну а еще у вас весело,солнечно,Пеле👍

    • @davidlucas5550
      @davidlucas5550 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@user-ti6xm4rz4fсмешно, ну меня не волнуют никакие обиды, честно говоря, мне кажется, что это смешно, но это правда чувак, к сожалению ничего хорошего отсюда не выходит, умные те, кто отсюда выходят.

    • @davidlucas5550
      @davidlucas5550 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@user-ti6xm4rz4f Поэтому я сказал, что мечтаю, чтобы США и Россия покончили со всем остальным.

  • @UNSC117
    @UNSC117 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks!

  • @Ow3nsdashing-zz3zt
    @Ow3nsdashing-zz3zt 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I Wonder why mexico and usa went up at the same time💀

  • @billyoconnell6669
    @billyoconnell6669 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    Imagine if all that money was used to improve people's lives instead of destroying them

    • @RickySpanish12344
      @RickySpanish12344 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      An unfortunate reality.

    • @ellidominusser1138
      @ellidominusser1138 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Impossible

    • @-Nyarlathotep
      @-Nyarlathotep ปีที่แล้ว +12

      then how do you defend against ennemy with rock and stick ?

    • @MBGA123
      @MBGA123 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      You have to provide security for them first

    • @ellidominusser1138
      @ellidominusser1138 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MBGA123 Well, the problem is, you don't need a 700 billion+ investment into military to protect your nation. Unless you consider invading other countries for their resources as "protecting our people"

  • @impastaissus1522
    @impastaissus1522 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    it’s interesting that the eastern block countries also had quite a lot spent on he military during the start of cold war

    • @user-nb4vs1jh1x
      @user-nb4vs1jh1x 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Меня это тоже удивило, если место Чехословакии можно объяснить, у неё и так была сильная военная промышленность ещё до вм2 то, как ГДР мог столько тратить, наверно деньги советы довели.

  • @alexeivoloshin5984
    @alexeivoloshin5984 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How did you convert USSR spending into dollars?

  • @gamingshowerthoughts9723
    @gamingshowerthoughts9723 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    For a split second in 1990 when Germany unifies the music changes and Germany starts climbing and its like wait are we doing this again????

  • @michaelneuwirth3414
    @michaelneuwirth3414 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    🇬🇧 The differentiation into the Kingdom of Prussia and Bavaria, the German Empire, the Weimar Republic, Nazi Germany, West and East Germany and since 1990 Germany for the geographical area of Germany reflects the political situation very accurately. In the case of Great Britain, on the other hand, I am simply missing the countries of the British Empire or the Commonwealth. A category NATO or Warsaw Pact would also reflect the historical events of the time more accurately. The same applies to the more than 50 states of the Ukaine Contact Group. In general, I consider the consideration of military expenditures to be much more meaningful than many other explanations for the course of history, so: Thank you for this YT video!
    🇩🇪 Die Differenzierung in Königreich Preussen und Bayern, deutsches Kaiserreich, Weimarer Republik, Nazi-Germany, West- und Ost-Deutschland und seit 1990 Deutschland für den geographischen Raum Deutschland gibt die politische Situation sehr exakt wieder. Bei Großbritannien hingegen fehlen mir schlichtweg die Länder des Britischen Empire bzw. des Commonwealth. Eine Kategorie NATO bzw. Warschauer Pakt würde das historische Zeitgeschehen ebenfalls genauer widerspiegeln. Gleiches gilt für die über 50 Staaten der Ukaine-Kontaktgruppe. Die Betrachtung von Militärausgaben halte ich generell für viel aussagekräftiger, als manch andere Erklärung für den Gang der Geschichte, deshalb: Danke für dieses YT-Video!

    • @tigerland4328
      @tigerland4328 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think this is just for the UK not the entire British empire. Also the UK has existed since 1801 (apart from a slight name change when most of Ireland left the Union in 1922) so the term "UK" or "United Kingdom" is correct as opposed to Germany which had many names during this time frame

    • @i3lackfusion
      @i3lackfusion หลายเดือนก่อน

      Its not flawless though, considering that nazi Germany wasn’t really a thing before 34

  • @ak-12ejoyer52
    @ak-12ejoyer52 ปีที่แล้ว +100

    The video is good, but it has a lot of mistakes. One of the big mistakes I've noticed is the hugely inflated country budgets for 1898, which were actually ~3 times lower than shown in the video. Also one of the big mistakes - the Russian military budget for 1994, which could not be equal to 94 billion dollars (which was more than the country's total budget for that year, lmao) and was actually about 13 billion dollars.

    • @matsi1944
      @matsi1944 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      And the Belgian flag 😮🤦

    • @Alex_R88
      @Alex_R88 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      я думаю, это все в перерасчете на сегодняшние деньги

    • @millionelectricvolts6117
      @millionelectricvolts6117 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@Alex_R88 So, adjusted for inflation? Probably is what happened

  • @game-bi7ed
    @game-bi7ed 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How did you do this?!

  • @timminh468
    @timminh468 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Now do one about national debt that would be interesting

  • @octoman_games
    @octoman_games 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Fascinating seeing empires rise and fall.

  • @phoepyae4577
    @phoepyae4577 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Wait wait Myanmar was higher than Russia and Italy once? No way..

  • @ahme_D20
    @ahme_D20 ปีที่แล้ว

    Germany:back to back slowly👀
    The world :hah?!

  • @commanderstorm8874
    @commanderstorm8874 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I like how you can tell whenever America was involved in a war because the defense budget would always shoot into the stratosphere

  • @edududu4705
    @edududu4705 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Você vê que tudo está tranquilo quando o Brasil se encontra no gráfico 😅😂

  • @user-vq6zu8wl1e
    @user-vq6zu8wl1e ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Прекрасно❤ всё очень наглядно и ясно. Спасибо за видео!

    • @bilboriches7216
      @bilboriches7216 ปีที่แล้ว

      Що тобі тут ясно, кацап? Ясно те що Україна вам ввалює гівна по самі гладни.

    • @Armmag
      @Armmag ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ясно, що русні пизда)

    • @AlexKoso
      @AlexKoso ปีที่แล้ว +5

      вот именно. очень интересная ситуация.
      Почему "самая мирная страна" - СССР в 1943, 1944, 1945 годах тратила меньше, чем в 1945, 1946, 1947 годах? :)

    • @user-vq6zu8wl1e
      @user-vq6zu8wl1e ปีที่แล้ว +13

      ​@@AlexKoso потому что самые светлые мозги рождаются именно в России. Например, пенициллин в США был изобретён раньше, но стоил дороже, чем впоследствии разработка пенициллина в СССР. И так - по всей остальной продукции. То же самое и сейчас - все виды нашего вооружения намного дешевле, чем во всех других странах мира. Что свидетельствует об уникальности человеческого материала в нашей самой лучшей на планете стране.

    • @AlexKoso
      @AlexKoso ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@user-vq6zu8wl1e завязывайте с нацизмом. Вам это ни к лицу :)

  • @eltomas0709
    @eltomas0709 ปีที่แล้ว

    de donde sacan esta información???

  • @te-bo7618
    @te-bo7618 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i cant seem to find any solid data before 1950 on military spending data either expenditure as a share of GDP or annual budget etc. idk where the person got this data from but it couldn't have been SIPRI Milex.

  • @jarq19
    @jarq19 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Now I understand why the People's Army of Poland was the same size (or even larger?) than the British Army at the time.

    • @epheboss6370
      @epheboss6370 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There was nothin like that

  • @HeritageStacking
    @HeritageStacking ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Did not expect to see Canada on here.

    • @wewantthegoldsuckah6317
      @wewantthegoldsuckah6317 ปีที่แล้ว

      Pressured by world police usa to arm up against the new world order BRICS or mainly Russia china and India

    • @Ravie3
      @Ravie3 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Canada, the most forgotten world power. World’s 9th largest economy, almost 40 million people, but totally forgotten as a power both now and in the past due to proximity and always being in alliance with the US and UK.

    • @HeritageStacking
      @HeritageStacking 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @Ravie3 I live in Canada I knew we had the 5th largest army in ww2 at the end. I just did not realize how powerful we are. On a side note one of indias Carriers was the HMCS Bonaventure.

  • @Rockiestmage
    @Rockiestmage 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It's like... you can almost smell the exact second someone touched our boats

  • @lewisd56
    @lewisd56 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The figures are wrong, certainly for UK expendature recently - are these adjusted for current inflation rates ot using historic rates? Under current rates, our budget in 2022 was $66bn not 57bn (£53bn) adjusted for historic inflation its closer to $70bn.

  • @liuyuzhi
    @liuyuzhi 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I'm curious. Even the Qing Dynasty itself didn't know how much its military expenditure was. Where did you hear that? Did the emperor tell you this personally when you traveled back in time to 1830?

    • @tarmnv
      @tarmnv 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      While I do not know the exact answer for Qing Dynasty case, but most of "spending" cases in history were taken from the book records from trading guilds. They always have a very good record about what when and how much was sold. And they've been keeping their ledgers for centuries. Similarly, some of the spending can be calculated from the known proportions. Like you've got a record from smith's guild about number of armor suits ordered. You can use this record and a knowledge about typical soldier's gear to estimate the rest of the spendings.

    • @liuyuzhi
      @liuyuzhi 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@tarmnv Maybe you know about the guilds, but you definitely don’t know about the Qing Dynasty

  • @Zopiexx
    @Zopiexx ปีที่แล้ว +36

    5:15 No no Germany

    • @jammin5563
      @jammin5563 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      HANS WHERE IS ZA PANERKAMPFWAGONS

    • @BenjaminMilekowsky
      @BenjaminMilekowsky ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nein nein nein

    • @jammin5563
      @jammin5563 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@BenjaminMilekowsky nein nein nein say it like zist NEIN NEIN NEIN!

  • @peterkorek-mv6rs
    @peterkorek-mv6rs ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1848 Revolutionary movement in Austria and Germany, 1853 War in Crimean peninsula, 1871 French-Prussian war, 1877 Russo-Turkish war, 1905 Russo-Japanese war

  • @1234kalmar
    @1234kalmar ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Informative, interesting,but lacks Gas Gas Gas.

  • @__MU_MU__
    @__MU_MU__ 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    The United States has more than 730 military bases around the world
    Media:Our world is threatened by Russia😂

    • @marcovidal9782
      @marcovidal9782 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      “Our world” = NATO and Russia is still a threat although not as remotely as dangerous as China. We’re still coming off that high of being the worlds sole superpower for almost 80 years.

    • @brok1589
      @brok1589 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well, it's ruled by scared dictator with 10k nukes

    • @user-ki3rb5pj6t
      @user-ki3rb5pj6t 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@brok1589 6k

    • @brandonf1260
      @brandonf1260 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Mm but the US isn't the one invading it's neighbors and disrupting the economic stability of the world.

  • @startledhamster
    @startledhamster 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Things I'm taking from this 1. Biggest USA export is war 2. Yugoslavia at one point had 7th largest military budget. No wonder west did everything it could to get rid of balkan super power. 3. Czechoslovakia, same as Yugoslavia. West doesn't like Slavic superpowers

  • @64Mustang
    @64Mustang 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I very much appreciate the Hoi4 soundtrack playing

  • @tigerland4328
    @tigerland4328 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Is this just the "army budget" or is it the entire defence budget ??

  • @user-hb4iw5gz7y
    @user-hb4iw5gz7y ปีที่แล้ว +7

    США тратит миллионы долларов чтобы создать ручку которая пишет в космосе, а Россия тратит 10центов,и берет с собой обычный карандаш, вот и разница в расходах

    • @user-nd2vp4su5c
      @user-nd2vp4su5c ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Сейчас сюда придёт какой-нибудь умник и напишет об грифеле от карандаша(что он опасен в условиях невесомости и ограниченной влажности)... Карандаши на космических станциях СССР были - восковые.
      Правда космическую ручку СССР всё-таки купил у США. Восковые карандаши пишут очень уж размыто.

  • @cmdryukarin-suki1054
    @cmdryukarin-suki1054 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    When budgets work, history is made.

  • @jamiejones7325
    @jamiejones7325 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Source?

  • @9tailedjak
    @9tailedjak หลายเดือนก่อน

    5:34 Didn't know Canada, Australia and New Zealand got that high in budget during WW2

  • @drksideofthewal
    @drksideofthewal ปีที่แล้ว +22

    And this is peacetime US spending. It can still skyrocket if it needs to.

    • @ellidominusser1138
      @ellidominusser1138 ปีที่แล้ว

      It can still pour countless billions into pointless wars if it wants to

    • @EricChien95
      @EricChien95 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We got infinite money baby, our money are propped up by our military and other countries rely on it. If they don't want our defense well they are in trouble.

    • @ellidominusser1138
      @ellidominusser1138 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@EricChien95 150% debt to gdp ratio 🙃

    • @dns7587
      @dns7587 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      if you see the pattern most budgets spiked before empire fall!

    • @willjapheth23789
      @willjapheth23789 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Well the industries that make military supplies can be pretty advanced and cannot be scaled quickly, so the days of sudden military spending seem to be over, now you need a standing military big enough to support advanced industry. And rely on stock piles of weapons.

  • @sakukullberg2697
    @sakukullberg2697 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Wow, Prussia was so efficient with its military spending.

  • @Gabros69
    @Gabros69 ปีที่แล้ว

    The percentage to gdp would have been nice

  • @Zoonjse
    @Zoonjse ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It costs money to run million bases around the world. plus contractors are charging the US Governemnt multiples amounts on items.

  • @le3le8
    @le3le8 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    It's just that Gorbachev came to power just in 1985 and America bought him, he decided to destroy the Union. Since then, everything has gone downhill. He himself did not begin to live in destroyed Russia, the remnants of the empire that he destroyed, preferred to live and go to another world in Germany. Yeltsin has more conscience and honor, although he began to abuse alcohol, he tried to correct what Gorbachev left him, it was Yeltsin who recommended Putin to the West, for which we thank him!

    • @willjapheth23789
      @willjapheth23789 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How did Gorbachev convince so many soviet republics to leave in just 5 years? Wow that's really impressive.

    • @adambalog7432
      @adambalog7432 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Oh yes Putin. Such a great guy. He wouldnt start a war. Right?

  • @user-yv1tz4jy1i
    @user-yv1tz4jy1i ปีที่แล้ว +26

    Сразу понятно какая страна самая миролюбивая и демократичная😂

    • @dissensiohola8994
      @dissensiohola8994 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      СССР 30-х годов, конечно. Сразу видно - стремился к миру)

    • @yuluoxianjun
      @yuluoxianjun ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@dissensiohola8994 USSR in 1930s control Mogolia to be independent from China.I dont think it is a Peaceful thing

    • @user-nd2vp4su5c
      @user-nd2vp4su5c ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@dissensiohola8994 в 30-х годах все были такие милые и пушистые. И ТОЛЬКО СТАЛИН...

  • @mad8764
    @mad8764 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very cool video

  • @ENGBriseB
    @ENGBriseB 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The UK was the 3rd largest Global defense spender in 2021. Only China and America spent more. 15th Feb 2022.

  • @jonathanbourke305
    @jonathanbourke305 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Soviet Union: "Let's spend a lot on the military."
    Third Reich: "Hold mein Bier."
    USA: "Put down your beer and hold both of mine."

  • @nicolaspeigne1429
    @nicolaspeigne1429 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I guess having the power to be totally in debt but still spend massive amounts of money inflated the numbers in modern times

    • @SebHaarfagre
      @SebHaarfagre ปีที่แล้ว +5

      In modern times?
      Standing armies is a relatively new thing, before that, countries bankrupted themselves thrice over using mercenaries (and sometimes benefited in the long run)

    • @nicolaspeigne1429
      @nicolaspeigne1429 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@SebHaarfagre except countries were actually expected to pay their debt back, and since their currency was based on the amount of gold they actually had, they couldn't borrow that much when they were bankrupted

    • @ni9274
      @ni9274 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It doesn’t matter that you’re in debt if you can pay the rate

    • @lred1383
      @lred1383 ปีที่แล้ว

      build up a big enough army and you ascend past the global economy, because you can simply not pay your bills and they can't take the money from you. They'll actually be paying you to keep to yourself

  • @SebHaarfagre
    @SebHaarfagre ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I'm surprised Canada spent so much in the early 50's. What was that, were they that active in the Korean war (I didn't know they were at all in such case, pardon to any Canadians)

    • @canadaphil6068
      @canadaphil6068 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Korean War..
      We also still used to field a very large Navy and were very active in supporting NATO with the stationing of several air force squadrons (first F86 Sabres, then Avro CF-100's) and tank brigades in Europe (mainly Centurians) in West Germany)
      To be honest, we are just a shell of what we once were.
      EDIT: Canada actually was a major contributor to the Anti-Submarine contingent of NATO in the North Atlantic during the Cold War (both Navy and Maritime Air Patrol) and also maintained 2 aircraft carriers from the 50's through 60's (but retired them both for good in early 70's)
      And of course there was the setting up of the DEW LINE and the NORAD defensive stations in tandem with the US for the defense of North America against the threat of Soviet bombers over the Arctic Circle.

    • @jamesg9468
      @jamesg9468 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It is sad to see the state of Canada's military today. Using frigates made in the 80s, with no plans in place to build more. Still not paying their 2% minimum obligation to NATO.

    • @willjapheth23789
      @willjapheth23789 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@jamesg9468 we depend on Canada and Denmark to protect the northpole.

  • @ir0n714
    @ir0n714 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    USA in 1991:
    *I DIDN'T HEAR NO BELL*

  • @poyloos4834
    @poyloos4834 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Someone needs to tell the US that the Cold War ended a couple decades ago. And you still get people in there saying they need to put more money into army?! It’s insane!

  • @andersonfisica6744
    @andersonfisica6744 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Estou surpreedido com o poder bélico do Império do Brasil desde 1843,surreal !!

    • @Jair_RJ
      @Jair_RJ 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Monarquia brasileira era maravilhosa

  • @user-vv3xe3ku1w
    @user-vv3xe3ku1w 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Сколько денег впустую выброшено.

  • @ypleK
    @ypleK หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Stayed for the HOI4 music

  • @lordbossharrow
    @lordbossharrow ปีที่แล้ว

    Is this the budget of just the Army or the whole military. The title says military but the video says Army so I'm confused.

    • @simonlind44
      @simonlind44 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The entire military

    • @athrunzala6770
      @athrunzala6770 ปีที่แล้ว

      these are the official data .. but is necessarily undervalued because many secret programs are not represented in the military budget

  • @ShaswataShaha
    @ShaswataShaha ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Russia and France historically spend a lot on military.

  • @smonyboy
    @smonyboy ปีที่แล้ว +28

    while definitely not higher than that of the US, some analysts believe china's actual military spending is understated

    • @RickySpanish12344
      @RickySpanish12344 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Very true, but I'd imagine the U.S. has black budget projects as well.

    • @smonyboy
      @smonyboy ปีที่แล้ว

      @@EricChien95 The fact that you're using military bases as a means of saying the numbers for both US and China are accurate is about as accurate as your reading abilities.

    • @user-kq5pj9py9c
      @user-kq5pj9py9c ปีที่แล้ว

      A Chinese military base poses a serious threat to the United States

    • @xy-inventor1885
      @xy-inventor1885 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @Ricky “you really think the US is spending 50,000 dollars on a hammer”

    • @RickySpanish12344
      @RickySpanish12344 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@xy-inventor1885 Yeah. If a politician is taking money from the hammer company

  • @Joewest2k11
    @Joewest2k11 ปีที่แล้ว

    US @ 1860 "Excuse me, you mind if I scooch over. Thanks!"

  • @lasvista2tech
    @lasvista2tech 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    One wonders how accurate these are and what exchange rates were used!