Unexpected to see my ethnicity 😂 Thanks you very much Decimali, as I claimed before being Mongolian in reality i’m also half Tibetan(Lhasa) so Tibetan/Buryat-Mongolian. We Tibetans don’t descends from Mongols, Turks, Chinese, Nepali as Myheritage indicates due to lack of distinct component for « Tibetan ancestry ». Tibetans descends from ancient East Asian highlanders lineage which is basal to lowlander East Asians and they are inhabitants to whole Tibetan plateau territory at 2:48 ancient populations genetic closeness it’s clearly showed three ancient Tibetic DNA from Northern Nepal which was part of Tibet before, as early to 2700BP so genetic continuity is very long in this region.🙏🏼
@@Ersen_abiniz It’s ok to be mixed, love is beyond intermixing and blood purity. But I’m not mixed as much as you my Anatolian colleagues 😂 I’m still 50% Buryat of pure Xiongnu descent (Illustrative DNA closeness prove)💪🏼 And Tibetans also have history and created huge and mighty Tibetan empire in 618-848years stretching right from Afghanistan to South East Asia up to Mongolia Gobi desert
@@born_this_way Another “trust me bro” assumption, there is no factor which make Buryats more Turkic than other Mongols. There is no such thing as “specific turkic genetic” because Mongols share pretty much same steppe(Sintashta+Slab Grave) components/ancestries with Turkics, just our amount of Slab Grave East Eurasian DNA is considerably higher, but one fact which clearly makes the difference between Mongols and Anatolian Turkish is that Mongols descends exclusively from Bronze Age pastoralists(Ulaanzukh/Slab Grave/Upper Xiajididan/Sintashta-Andronovo) and don’t have any “outside of steppe” ancestries unlike you who descends in majority from Anatolian/Zagrossian farmers.
Nearly all east asians! I really appreciate your great work! You are the greatest scientist who share genetic datas. In my opinion, C2, D, K2 southeast asians are unique ancestors of agglutinative languages and related other languages spoken all around the world having descendant haplogroups C2, C3, C4, D, K2b, M, N, O1, O2, O3, P, P1, Q, R, R1, R1a, R1b, R2, S. These are related agglutinative languages: Australian Aborigin, Austronesian, Austroasiatic, Thai-Kadai, Tibeto-Burman, Sinitic Chinese, Koreanic, Japonic, Mongolic, Tungusic, Dene-Yeniseian, Native American, Uralic, Finnic, Hunnic, Turkic, Ugric, Brushaski Hunza, Dravidian, Elamite, Sumerian, Old Anatolian, Phyrigian, Palesgian, North Caucasian, Balkar, Kumuk, Tyrrhenian, Etruscan, Raetic, Vasconic, Basq, Aquitan, Old Saxonian, Old Scottish...
3:36 Harappaworld gedmatch is the most accurate for Tibetans because of well selected ethnicity “components” like the South Indian component which in the case not South Indian but native Himalayan Basal East-Eurasian ancestry in Tibetans.
Tibetans have acquired several genes that help them use smaller amounts of Oxygen that helps them to live in that High Altitude. its a gene version in the EPAS1 gene marker. A gene Tibetans inherited from DENISOVANS
My granddad was from that region, dont know how he reached Jamaica from there during the time of the journey there to be indentured servants. Late 1800s to early 1900s
Hola, ¿qué estás diciendo es bastante interesante y puedo saber de dónde eres? Supongo que tu abuela es nativa americana, sé que los amerindios del sur que viven cerca de las montañas de los Andes se parecen mucho a los tibetanos en términos de forma de vida, vestimenta y apariencia física (la tribu quechua, por ejemplo)
3:47 interesting that this calculator showed only 77,82% Mongoloid for Tibetans, there is reason while being at big majority of Mongoloid East Eurasian descent Tibetans also have some lineages from Basal-East Eurasians(non-mongoloid) like the ancient Tian-Yuan, Ust Ishim and ancient Amur river 33000BP individual were of basal East-Eurasian lineage as well, And it’s known that Yana Ancient North Siberian individual had partially this Basal ancestry, probably all of them were related and widespread in Upper-Palaeolithic continental Asia. LM genetics calculator shows the South Asian-Sahulian component which is confused Basal East Eurasian ancestry, this lineage is also responsible why Tibetans got y-DNA D which is in Asia only shared in high amounts by Ainus who also have this significant Basal admixture.
@@barguttobed What you said is only valid for Izmir and Thrace region. The population of that region is only 10 million, but the population of Türkiye is 85 million. I am a Turkmen from Anatolia. I have a slight squint in my eyes. I did not have a DNA test, but our regions are generally as Turkish as Turkmenistan. It is even more Turkish than Turkmenistan, assuming that Turkmenistan has become a little Iranian. There is very little Greek in the Mediterranean region.
@@Bilinmeyenbiri1236yxzuwjvwjci lol no. Turkmens more Turkic than Turkish because Turkish mixed a lot with native Anatolians, Circassians, balkans, etc. Unless you migrants from central asia after 19th century
Decimali lütfen bizede bir yorum yap ben Koyuncu lu yörükleri ve Pehlivanlı türkmen aşiretine bağlı iki aile den gelen biriyim, ben hangi kültürün genlerini taşıyorum , turanit bir ailem olduğunu düşünüyorum ammaki bunu kanıtlamak benim için şuan zor 1071 den bu güne neredeyse bin yıl geçmiş acaba 🤔 orta Anadolu da yaşayan eski toplumlar ile bir karışım yaşadıkmı bilmiyorum bildiğim 1750 yılından bu tarafa daha eskiyi bilmiyorum, şimdi bana yardımcı olun ve genetik bağlarımızı bize açıklayın rica ederim 🖐️
@@humancake115 Avrupa'ya kaçıp hayatını kurtarabilirsin. Orada sürünmek Türkiye de sömürülmekten iyidir. Kampta çalışmadan aldığın 37 lira ile DNA testini yaparsın. 1 ay sonra Heime geçtiğinde 370 lira ile hayatın daha da güzelleşir. Çalışma izni çıkana kadar da kaçak bir iş bulursan senden kralı yok. Zaten ondan sonrası çalış, ye, iç ve yat.
unfortunately because of ccp, we don't have enough data about tibetan dna, i believe tibetans have very different dna because of their geographical isolation
everyone on Earth has Neanderthal Genes and some Southeast Asians/Pacific Islanders/Native American/Australian Aborigine/Papuan/Melanesian have both Neanderthal and Denisovan. The only people with ZERO to very tiny amount are Sub-Saharan Africans.
There is another half Tibetan dude half European dude who scored high Central Asian, Mongolian, and got 57,3% Asian and 42,7% European which is wrong since he is straight half Asian(Tibetan) half European(Brittish). The Central Asian is the most wrong component it’s basically absorbed his lacking 7,3% European and mix with his Tibetan mongoloid ancestry so the mix of East-West Eurasian ancestries is confused by Central Asian. Just another example about how incoherent are my heritage algorithms.. I feel sad for my fellow Tibetans who do this test to be deceived as being 0%Tibetan but instead being China/Mongolia/CentralAsia/Nepal mix th-cam.com/video/3Ns2G3FvFfI/w-d-xo.html (link for Tibetan dude dna test, watch from 4:55)
Because “Chinese and Vietnamese” reference is only perfect fit for southern Guangdong Han and Hmong Miao groups which are too much South East Asian shifted genetically. Btw Sino-Tibetan doesn’t mean Chinese and this language family is propably older than Indo-European one.
@@barguttobed all Uyghurs have different ancestry despite to regions. Uyghurs of Kashgar may have more Indo Iranic genes, and Some Karluk, Hun, Moghulistan even they can score Tarim mummy ancestry. Whenever I see Kashgarians, I see their height is very tall as like Mummies.
@@barguttobed1,90cm even 2 meters... for Asians they were extremely Tall. even their clothes very alien to East Asians. but not for Uyghurs. I have friend from Kashgar, his grandpa's height is 210cm..
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat They seems mysterious for me, than I saw picture of those mummified persons I felt really strange inside me. Their bodies, especially skin and hair were so well preserved that just by looking I could imagine them alive, like they are passed away just some years ago while some of those mummies lived almost 4000 years ago. Something tells me that they were not ordinary people and they had strange powers and i feel superstitious about that it was not a good idea to discover and open their tombs to bother them so many thousands years later, bad things could happens on our heads after that.
She is not a pure Tibetan. This is misleading. Original Tibetans do not have Nepali, which is Indian or south Asian. India is actually a sub continent that it’s a continent by itself, not part of the Eurasian continent, but collided with the Eurasian continent. Really should be called Indian continent, and the people are Indian rather than Asian.
Nonsense, she is as pure Tibetan as it can be, and closest to any other Tibetan groups 3:00 on genetic distances. It's just that myheritage don't have separate Tibetan population reference so it's scoring Mongolian Nepali Chinese Central asia etc.. on their algorithms. Although Tibetans are it own genetically unique group
MH is grossly inaccurate. If you really want to know your Asian origin DNA try Eugene because when it's comes to Asian DNA Eugene has larger database than MH...Why I hate MH because according to MH Korean and Japanese are same people, Chinese and Vietnamese are same people, Northern Han Chinese are not Chinese (apparently they think southern han real Chinese which is absurd) and Mongolian, Manchu, Siberian and Siberian Turks are same which is again not accurate.
The best dna channel
Unexpected to see my ethnicity 😂 Thanks you very much Decimali, as I claimed before being Mongolian in reality i’m also half Tibetan(Lhasa) so Tibetan/Buryat-Mongolian. We Tibetans don’t descends from Mongols, Turks, Chinese, Nepali as Myheritage indicates due to lack of distinct component for « Tibetan ancestry ». Tibetans descends from ancient East Asian highlanders lineage which is basal to lowlander East Asians and they are inhabitants to whole Tibetan plateau territory at 2:48 ancient populations genetic closeness it’s clearly showed three ancient Tibetic DNA from Northern Nepal which was part of Tibet before, as early to 2700BP so genetic continuity is very long in this region.🙏🏼
Buryats and Mongolians are different peoples, there is no such thing as Buryat-Mongolians.
Why did you lie to us. My small mixed race brother
@@Ersen_abiniz It’s ok to be mixed, love is beyond intermixing and blood purity. But I’m not mixed as much as you my Anatolian colleagues 😂 I’m still 50% Buryat of pure Xiongnu descent (Illustrative DNA closeness prove)💪🏼 And Tibetans also have history and created huge and mighty Tibetan empire in 618-848years stretching right from Afghanistan to South East Asia up to Mongolia Gobi desert
@@barguttobed Buryats are the most Turkic ethnic among Mongolics
@@born_this_way Another “trust me bro” assumption, there is no factor which make Buryats more Turkic than other Mongols. There is no such thing as “specific turkic genetic” because Mongols share pretty much same steppe(Sintashta+Slab Grave) components/ancestries with Turkics, just our amount of Slab Grave East Eurasian DNA is considerably higher, but one fact which clearly makes the difference between Mongols and Anatolian Turkish is that Mongols descends exclusively from Bronze Age pastoralists(Ulaanzukh/Slab Grave/Upper Xiajididan/Sintashta-Andronovo) and don’t have any “outside of steppe” ancestries unlike you who descends in majority from Anatolian/Zagrossian farmers.
Nearly all east asians! I really appreciate your great work! You are the greatest scientist who share genetic datas.
In my opinion, C2, D, K2 southeast asians are unique ancestors of agglutinative languages and related other languages spoken all around the world having descendant haplogroups C2, C3, C4, D, K2b, M, N, O1, O2, O3, P, P1, Q, R, R1, R1a, R1b, R2, S.
These are related agglutinative languages:
Australian Aborigin,
Austronesian,
Austroasiatic,
Thai-Kadai,
Tibeto-Burman,
Sinitic Chinese,
Koreanic, Japonic,
Mongolic, Tungusic,
Dene-Yeniseian,
Native American,
Uralic, Finnic,
Hunnic, Turkic, Ugric,
Brushaski Hunza, Dravidian,
Elamite, Sumerian,
Old Anatolian, Phyrigian, Palesgian,
North Caucasian, Balkar, Kumuk,
Tyrrhenian, Etruscan, Raetic,
Vasconic, Basq, Aquitan,
Old Saxonian, Old Scottish...
3:36 Harappaworld gedmatch is the most accurate for Tibetans because of well selected ethnicity “components” like the South Indian component which in the case not South Indian but native Himalayan Basal East-Eurasian ancestry in Tibetans.
The beginning o l d women looks. ~ straight- up Navajo😅😮
All roads lead to India
Everything from the West came from the east and all roads lead to india
Great work. Respect❤
Cool, but can you still do a video on Tocharian people, Tibeto-Burman people are related to bamars.
Tibetans have acquired several genes that help them use smaller amounts of Oxygen that helps them to live in that High Altitude. its a gene version in the EPAS1 gene marker. A gene Tibetans inherited from DENISOVANS
She's got more nepali than most nepali people
100% Human
Race: East Asian
This mtdna is mostly in Japan and its subclades are also in China, Taiwan and also Nepal
👍🏼
@@barguttobed ❤
the most peaceful comment section in this channel
Less Turkic troll
@@dnaguy4769 İ am not turkic trool
but in this channel the amount of anti turkic trolls is 💀
@Kaban-ordusu weird thing is in most dna videos trolls will talk about turks either for or against 😂
@@dnaguy4769😂😂😂yeah I was thinking the same ! Omg they are terrible
But she did show 5% turkish
I'm surprised they don't claim nepal too
2:22 What’s the soundtrack Decimali? Must be kind of Gorshay songs.
My granddad was from that region, dont know how he reached Jamaica from there during the time of the journey there to be indentured servants. Late 1800s to early 1900s
Least anormal Myheritage ethnicity estimate😅
Very cool results 👌👍Basically in this result is included every East Asian ethnicity except Inuit and Native American. Regards 🙌
Scored 2,1% Mesoamerican and Andead
I thought of Native American component on MH from North America
please test a sample from Bactria-Margiana Oxus Civilization .
+
all i learned is that tibetans are tibetan
Bravo! And now logic test question: What else Tibetans should be if not being just Tibetans?
@@barguttobed chinese?
@@canadaone2385 Chinese citizenship maybe not blood
😂😂😂
I saw a video on your channel for Yemenite Jew but i look it up again and i didnt find it, did you delete the video?
Parece com a minha avó aquela do começo, só que não conheço nenhuma parente da Ásia.
Hola, ¿qué estás diciendo es bastante interesante y puedo saber de dónde eres? Supongo que tu abuela es nativa americana, sé que los amerindios del sur que viven cerca de las montañas de los Andes se parecen mucho a los tibetanos en términos de forma de vida, vestimenta y apariencia física (la tribu quechua, por ejemplo)
3:47 interesting that this calculator showed only 77,82% Mongoloid for Tibetans, there is reason while being at big majority of Mongoloid East Eurasian descent Tibetans also have some lineages from Basal-East Eurasians(non-mongoloid) like the ancient Tian-Yuan, Ust Ishim and ancient Amur river 33000BP individual were of basal East-Eurasian lineage as well, And it’s known that Yana Ancient North Siberian individual had partially this Basal ancestry, probably all of them were related and widespread in Upper-Palaeolithic continental Asia. LM genetics calculator shows the South Asian-Sahulian component which is confused Basal East Eurasian ancestry, this lineage is also responsible why Tibetans got y-DNA D which is in Asia only shared in high amounts by Ainus who also have this significant Basal admixture.
Not only Ainus but mainland Japanese and especially Okinawans also have significant basak admixture.
@@mitonaarea5856 Yeah they got some Jomon admixture about 14% something like that for Yamato and even more for Ryukyuans
I read in Divan-ı lügati't-türk that it is very difficult to distinguish Tibetans from a Turk.
But today it’s very difficult to distiguish between a Turk and a Greek😂 Times change..
@@barguttobed What you said is only valid for Izmir and Thrace region. The population of that region is only 10 million, but the population of Türkiye is 85 million. I am a Turkmen from Anatolia. I have a slight squint in my eyes. I did not have a DNA test, but our regions are generally as Turkish as Turkmenistan. It is even more Turkish than Turkmenistan, assuming that Turkmenistan has become a little Iranian. There is very little Greek in the Mediterranean region.
@@barguttobed
Dung!
@@Bilinmeyenbiri1236yxzuwjvwjci lol no. Turkmens more Turkic than Turkish because Turkish mixed a lot with native Anatolians, Circassians, balkans, etc. Unless you migrants from central asia after 19th century
@@Bilinmeyenbiri1236yxzuwjvwjci what do you mean? Tibetans look asians like Kazakhs and Kyrgyz unlike Turks who look European
Decimali lütfen bizede bir yorum yap ben Koyuncu lu yörükleri ve Pehlivanlı türkmen aşiretine bağlı iki aile den gelen biriyim, ben hangi kültürün genlerini taşıyorum , turanit bir ailem olduğunu düşünüyorum ammaki bunu kanıtlamak benim için şuan zor 1071 den bu güne neredeyse bin yıl geçmiş acaba 🤔 orta Anadolu da yaşayan eski toplumlar ile bir karışım yaşadıkmı bilmiyorum bildiğim 1750 yılından bu tarafa daha eskiyi bilmiyorum, şimdi bana yardımcı olun ve genetik bağlarımızı bize açıklayın rica ederim 🖐️
Arkadaş o kadar merak ediyorsan yap bir DNA testi, sonuçlarını öğren.
@@EwladeCyrusDERSİM nasıl yapılır bilmiyorumki
@@bahattincevik3168 İnternetten kit isteyeceksin. Tükürük örneğini gönderecek ve sonuçları bekleyeceksin. Hepsi bu kadar.
@@EwladeCyrusDERSİMkaç yıldır dolar euro düşsün öyle alırım diyorum şimdi dolar 30 olcak bunun daha ucuz bi yolu yok mu 🥲
@@humancake115 Avrupa'ya kaçıp hayatını kurtarabilirsin. Orada sürünmek Türkiye de sömürülmekten iyidir. Kampta çalışmadan aldığın 37 lira ile DNA testini yaparsın. 1 ay sonra Heime geçtiğinde 370 lira ile hayatın daha da güzelleşir. Çalışma izni çıkana kadar da kaçak bir iş bulursan senden kralı yok. Zaten ondan sonrası çalış, ye, iç ve yat.
unfortunately because of ccp, we don't have enough data about tibetan dna, i believe tibetans have very different dna because of their geographical isolation
How much yellow river farmer and ancient northeast asian(ANA) ancestry they do have?
I took a DNA test, I found out I'm a little Neanderthal from El Sidron, Spain ( 49,000 years ago ). Is that true ?
Sure, the highest Neanderthal DNA appears in that area, the second is Caucasus.
everyone on Earth has Neanderthal Genes and some Southeast Asians/Pacific Islanders/Native American/Australian Aborigine/Papuan/Melanesian have both Neanderthal and Denisovan.
The only people with ZERO to very tiny amount are Sub-Saharan Africans.
There is another half Tibetan dude half European dude who scored high Central Asian, Mongolian, and got 57,3% Asian and 42,7% European which is wrong since he is straight half Asian(Tibetan) half European(Brittish). The Central Asian is the most wrong component it’s basically absorbed his lacking 7,3% European and mix with his Tibetan mongoloid ancestry so the mix of East-West Eurasian ancestries is confused by Central Asian. Just another example about how incoherent are my heritage algorithms.. I feel sad for my fellow Tibetans who do this test to be deceived as being 0%Tibetan but instead being China/Mongolia/CentralAsia/Nepal mix
th-cam.com/video/3Ns2G3FvFfI/w-d-xo.html (link for Tibetan dude dna test, watch from 4:55)
@Cyrus The Great What is Zaza? It’s in Iran?
@Cyrus The Great Ok ok, I heard that it’s something close to Kurds
they have more Turkic than azeris and turks
Precisely
I think you are sleeping, haplogroup C3 is present in central asia;however. İt isn’t the original turkic haplogroup.
😂
У Турков это 0-25%, у него же процент тюркость на уровне азербайджанцев от 8-18%
why do these sino-tibetan speaking people have such high mongolian? nepalese and chinese should be higher
Because “Chinese and Vietnamese” reference is only perfect fit for southern Guangdong Han and Hmong Miao groups which are too much South East Asian shifted genetically. Btw Sino-Tibetan doesn’t mean Chinese and this language family is propably older than Indo-European one.
Can you do more about Uyghurs?
Especially Kashgar Uyghurs?
Are Kashgar Uygur different?
@@barguttobed all Uyghurs have different ancestry despite to regions.
Uyghurs of Kashgar may have more Indo Iranic genes, and Some Karluk, Hun, Moghulistan even they can score Tarim mummy ancestry.
Whenever I see Kashgarians, I see their height is very tall as like Mummies.
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat Tarim mummies were tall?
@@barguttobed1,90cm even 2 meters...
for Asians they were extremely Tall.
even their clothes very alien to East Asians.
but not for Uyghurs.
I have friend from Kashgar, his grandpa's height is 210cm..
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat They seems mysterious for me, than I saw picture of those mummified persons I felt really strange inside me. Their bodies, especially skin and hair were so well preserved that just by looking I could imagine them alive, like they are passed away just some years ago while some of those mummies lived almost 4000 years ago. Something tells me that they were not ordinary people and they had strange powers and i feel superstitious about that it was not a good idea to discover and open their tombs to bother them so many thousands years later, bad things could happens on our heads after that.
Closer to rai more than tamang ok thats amazing
Tashinam Tamang are pretty close to, but I think those from Tashinam heavily mixed with Sherpa and Tibetans
So a tibetan lady dint have no tibetan dna ?? Or tibetan is put under chines ??
tibetan and chinese dna are indistinguishable
@willliu8944 well that's the dumbest answer I heard 🤣🤣🤣
Plz Metei Pangal or Bengali 😢😢😢
She is not a pure Tibetan. This is misleading. Original Tibetans do not have Nepali, which is Indian or south Asian. India is actually a sub continent that it’s a continent by itself, not part of the Eurasian continent, but collided with the Eurasian continent. Really should be called Indian continent, and the people are Indian rather than Asian.
Nonsense, she is as pure Tibetan as it can be, and closest to any other Tibetan groups 3:00 on genetic distances. It's just that myheritage don't have separate Tibetan population reference so it's scoring Mongolian Nepali Chinese Central asia etc.. on their algorithms. Although Tibetans are it own genetically unique group
Mongolian Imfao
I love kebab its delicious
@@Alghi451 XD
MH is grossly inaccurate. If you really want to know your Asian origin DNA try Eugene because when it's comes to Asian DNA Eugene has larger database than MH...Why I hate MH because according to MH Korean and Japanese are same people, Chinese and Vietnamese are same people, Northern Han Chinese are not Chinese (apparently they think southern han real Chinese which is absurd) and Mongolian, Manchu, Siberian and Siberian Turks are same which is again not accurate.
Pure Turkic
As an turkic,I dont agree with you.Dont you see its 100%🇲🇳
@@igrodelie Pure🇬🇷
Turkic and altaic are different? 3:25
Yes ofc
pls yayoi, jomon or hayato results
do You have dna test on Khas people of Nepal?
Please music name at 2:23
Put Chinese and viet together is so ridiculous