Can you please do an episode on the DNA of the Xiongnu or the HUNS? They had such a profound impact on China and European history that their stories deserve to be more well-known
In ancient Chinese writing, Xiong-nu was written as Hun-nu. The suffix nu means rude in ancient Chinese. Naturally, the ancient Chinese used to insult all other non-Chinese countries like this. So the nomads who lived north of China were called Hun/Hon. And we know that in European history they are called Huns
In ancient Chinese writing, Xiong-nu was written as Hun-nu. The suffix nu means rude in ancient Chinese. Naturally, the ancient Chinese used to insult all other non-Chinese countries like this. So the nomads who lived north of China were called Hun/Hon. And we know that in European history they are called Huns
2:48 The same mistake is in all videos which mention the Mongols. Those eagle-hunters wearing red tymaqs (caps) ARE KAZAKHS, a Turkic people, and not Mongols of today! The Khalkha Mongols' national clothes is different and they don't have eagle-hunting.
Very nice and interesting video, big thanks for your work Decimali! I'm very curious about getting G25 coordinates of Emperor Wu sample may i ask you sharing it with me?
Thanks! Here are the coords. Emperor_Wu:H12501,0.031608,-0.424216,0.061312,-0.038216,-0.039946,-0.030717,0.012314,0.015394,0.008528,0.018498,-0.052348,-0.002319,0.003222,0.001133,-0.005686,-0.004987,0.000427,0.000517,0.001525,0.012241,-0.003295,-0.001868,-0.016174,0.002682,0.010255
@@jaehyunpark3834 you mean the Pontiac c2? Back in a few years ago, I have a Thailand friend native whose dna checked got her fall into Pontiac native in America. It turns out her third generation ancestors settled in Thailand. Few generations back from Yangzi river. And probably a few more back slipped through the Ming end of Mongol ethnic cleansing when a few more generations and centuries back from Siberia joining the ethnic Xongnu and Avers. No. It’s not imaginary. Now the Thailand natives have been living in America Midwest cities for more than 60 years, it looks like they are very close to those living in reserves a few miles away from them. After a thousand years apart. If you look at some genealogy of First Nations, they are surprisingly complete. You could trace some of their European ancestors back in Brittany around 1300 and even the same period ancestors in Blackfoot tribes on the rockies and Cherokee in the east. And then some became French speaking in the cities and came back to live on reserves. And later get forced their children to live on residence schools in the West coast and then moved to the USA and some do come back to stay between city and reserve . This is life for them and lots of them to.
@@jaehyunpark3834 no research is needed. the native americans having mongolian C2 is accepted by anyone who is familiar with this halogroup. it is also seen in DNA reveal videos on youtube of native americans. One, i watched earlier today. Surprising is that the indigenous in minnesotta have very high neanderthal. I thought neanderthals were closer to northern europeans. hmmm
Can you do one of the goths? The origins of them are unclear but there own legend (jordanes) said that they came from southern scandinavia so I'm curious if that's the case
There were some investigations about. They came from scandinavia and settled for some time at the today polish shores of the baltic sea. The name of the island Gotland is for a reason. Also the name of the city Göteborg at the river Göta älv. There is besides the DNA samples also a cultural continuity between the people from Gotland and later the polish shores of the baltic sea by archeological findings.
How about the ancient people moved over centuries slowly from west snd north into whst we call Mongolia today and kept settling farther east and south, came from nort direction due to mountains and the need for water amd rain for grass and hourses
@@balkanic1971 Çinli değilim ama Anadolu'da 1000 yıl geçirince sizin gibi batı Avrasya işe yaramaz genlerle hala 6.9 eastern step, 2.9 yellow river farmers genomu hala varsa kanimizda ve haplogroup Q olunca Türk kökenli olduğunu söyleyebiliriz
Nice video, but frankly, there's nothing unexpected here. I teach Classical Chinese, and could have given you roughly the same information (without the haplogroup terminology) just from the history books. The idea that he was poisoned or killed never gained much currency, and if you look at that general period, 36 years old was not really that young. A lot of emperors died in their twenties. Even most of the Tang emperors died in their 40s. BTW, he was not given the title Wu until after he died. He's really a fascinating character, totally controlled by his uncle for the first 18 years of his reign. Then he became the only emperor in Chinese history to murder a dominating official personally. When he judged the time right, he distracted his uncle, and clobbered him over the head.
3:40 I am Korean. His face can be commonly seen in our neighborhood. Ancient Koreans fought a lot with the Xianbei tribe. And Khitan is a descendant of the Xianbei tribe. Korea also fought fiercely against the Khitans.
@@yodaichi888 naw I can distinguish them from southern chinese, most japanese, and most siberians but eastern mongols, manchus, etc. looks just like koreans
HIS NAME IS 宇文邕 宇文=SURNAME 邕=GIVEN NAME HIS COUNTRY IS NORTH ZHOU（北周）. HE IS CALLED EMPEROR WU（武帝）. HIS RACE IS 鮮卑. 鮮卑 IS A NOMADIC PEOPLE IN THE NORTHERN CHINA. THE HAN CHINESE CALL THEM, THE PEOPLE ON THE HORSES（馬上民族）
A large percentage of Northern Han Chinese have Mongolic origin, so it is probably incorrect to say the DNA results were unexpected. It would be unexpected if he had European origin, but not Mongolic
@@barguttobedThe Xianbei(after kithai) are not a people of the modern Republic of Mongolia(mongol), but are a stream of pan mongolic people. And they were assimilated into the Han Chinese ethnicity society in northern China and Mongolia over a period of 1,000 years. That is why the northern Chinese people are greatly influenced by Mongolian genes.
Technically he wasn’t Mongolian because Mongolia did not exist during his time. Xianbei were the ancestors to the mongols. Northern Zhou was a dynasty founded by nomadic tribes that abandoned their nomadic lifestyle adopted Chinese culture after the chaos caused by the 3 kingdoms period caused a vacuum of power in the north of China .
Mongolia was always exist, his Y haplogroup, his dynasty supports the emperor was a mongolian. Recorded xianbei language is also mongolian. Farmer populations were always been weak for steppe nomads.
@@postachamdi6286 Don't be ridiculous. The Xianbei were originally vassals of the Han Dynasty. After the fall of the Han Dynasty, China fell into a 200-year-long civil war, with a sharp decline in population and depletion of national strength. The royal family was all killed, and a power vacuum appeared. Then the Xianbei claimed to be the orthodox descendants of the Han people and joined the Chinese civil war under the banner of reviving the Han Dynasty.
@@神可汗yeah except the Sima or Chen or Liu Song are the established Han. Therefore Xianbei are the pretender. They aren't Han. Yes they are Chinese maybe genetically and stretching linguistically but not really Chinese. Because they opposed the Han Chinese Emperor of the South. Therefore not really Chinese. Its complicated.
@@stump4522 China has always been a diverse country. Why are those who oppose the Southern Han emperor not true Chinese? They are not against Han culture. Chinese people value cultural identity, not genetic identity.
Mongolic nations have really long history over rulling various Chinese dynasties. Even Aisin Gioro clan that ruled late Jin and Qing dynasties carried C3b1a3a2-F8951 haplogroup associated with Mongolic but not Tungusic people.
@@Scythian_nomad Я упомянул маньчжурскую династию Цинь потому что у ее правящего клана Айсин Гиоро монгольская гаплогруппа, так что скорее верхушка по происхождению они монгольская(отчасти), а так сами маньчжуры не монголы конечно.
@user-mm7zi4ue7dахахаха Xirong or Rong были азиатами, а не иранцами. Скорее всего они были носителями линий N1C1 и были родственны самодийцам и никогда не были во власти предков Хань. Горные Xirong были ассимилированы племенами Дун-Ху и позднее были известны как Урианхай
The Mongolian nation has been part of China for a long time. Xianbei was originally a vassal state of the Jin Dynasty. After the War of the Eight Princes, all the heirs to the throne of the Chinese dynasty died. The northern nomads (Southern Xiongnu, Xianbei) as vassals naturally also participated in the fight for the throne. It can be seen from the portraits that they were very Chinese and not at all like today's Outer Mongolians. Outer Mongolians should return to China instead of abandoning their ancestors
Northern Zhou - Sui - Tang (change of regimes through aristocratic coup, regardless of their subjective cultural identity, they all have Xianbei ancestry).
It's "unexpected" that the DNA profile of an ancient Chinese emperor is broadly similar to modern Northeast Asians? Talk about click bait. Thumbs down!
I have a question for the experts I did dna test Some stated i have y dna I1 Yet another said n p43 Stating although i have 8 snp I markers the most recent and next to.most recent are both N N p43 being most recent Who is correct ?? Thank you
@@meralkeskin8511 Süleyman şah ın mezarı bulundu mu , caber kalesindeki mezar kime ait çözüldümü ? Halep kapısı deniyor gerçekten oradamı yoksa temsilimi bunları çıkıp bir tarihçi prof açıklamıyor.
You keep misunderstanding what the "ethnicity" tests really are about. You confuse _similarity_ (which the DNA tests can tell) with history (which the DNA tests cannot tell.)
I wonder if he has any links to the ainu of japan. There was a study of the ainu and they detected a mysterious siberian admixture. Could his people be the missing link.🤔
The result makes sense because Northern Zhou was a government by non-Han Chinese. But all of them has Han Chinese in them. The Han Chinese and the Hu or “barbarians” were all from the same stock originally.
They're not though lmao you kidding? Unless you mean they come from the same stock the same way every one technically 'comes from the same stock' if you go back far enough.
@gabaghoul__ Ethnic names always refer to slightly different constitutions of people over time. Xianbei was sinicized and eventually incorporated into ancient Han, while modern Han people is a conglomeration of those ancient tribes that have "disappeared" in the history. This is similar to Uyghurs. Ancient Uyghurs were mostly northeastern asians but migrated into Tarim basin and intermarried with local Tocharians and began to have more European features. At the end of day, names are names, and we can't confused names used at one time with same names but used for different times.
is there a secret oath of you "researchers" to not name any Turkic in your "research" you all did? When there's strong Turkic evidence involved, they quickly speak of "speculation" or "might be" or as we got used to it "Mongolian". Mongolia was largely inhabitted by Turkic tribes for a very long time till genghis khan came in. Even our legendary city is somewhere there "Otuken", Erghenekhon etc etc
The Xianbei used several names, including Northern Zhou, so it's probably 3%. Before this genetic research, it was unclear for me, but the Xianbei were descended from the Shang dynasty, a dynasty that preceded the Zhou. The haplogroup of Zhou aristocrats found in Zhou ruins is confirmed to be N, so it's 3%. Plus, many modern Chinese claim to be descendants of Zhou royalty, because after the decline of the Zhou dynasty, their slaves Chinese grew up with the development of agriculture and technology, and falsified history to call themselves Zhou. And that's where the Chinese started, by falsifying history to call themselves as a different ethnic. Its long time tradition of Chinese.
@@ddding9518 Chinese: He's lying! I'm Chinese, so I'm right!!! (Rationale: with no evidence) He: (Rationale: Claim based on scientific and historical evidence)
China itself is many warring states nation . therefore it makes sense to split up into many states like it once was. And its scary to have a one goverment...like today being too powerful. There are ethnic people and nationality within China itself. But the goverment just mute, imprison, any dissent.
Rubbish ! The 55 minority ethnicities of today's China have all their human rights protected under the PRC Constitution since 1954. Go do some research before you parrot the CIA, NED & MSM & their puppets in the ETIM & World Uyghur Congress...
Xianbei is not same origin like mongol people Xianbei is confederation state lika hunnu and Scythians but just The ruling class was a mongol. Xianbei actually like Mongol-Turco state like a tabgach state This is my opinions but its true :D.
So what Mongol. Manchu , Chinese all Orientals same race different ethnicities, like the Saxons and the Celts . So what, what is the insinuation here ?
The mentioned groups, including the Mongols, Manchu, Chinese, Saxons, and Celts, are claimed to be descendants of Japheth, sometimes called Japheth-Nese, a name that echoes Japanese. Ashkenaz, also known as Ashkuz, and his uncle Meshech, who had offspring named Ya and Vuza, are thought to be ancestors of the Yakuza. Additionally, he is considered a progenitor of the Russians, who engaged in conflict with the Japanese between 1904 and 1905.
Turks are strange,Historically, Xianbei people and Mongols，Manchus slaughtered Turks, but Turks said Xianbei people, Mongols and Manchus were Turks. 19th century, Russians also suppressed and slaughter Turks. Are Russians Turks?
@@stump4522 true，When the Mongols went west, they slaughtered a large number of Turks. Today, many Turks firmly believe that Genghis Khan is a Turk.They are proud of the Mongolian Empire, and think that during the Yuan Dynasty in China, Turks ruled China.
Northern Zhou, Sui, and Tang..all of those dynasties are constructed by XIanbei, nothern steppe origin nomadic people who spoke NOT CHINESE but steppe Altaic language or Mongol-Tungusic language. Their rivalry with real Chinese-Han dates back to Han dynasty. Their conquest of China was response to Han Dynasty's evasion to Northern Steppe Xiongnu confederation, Donghu.
False historical statements only mislead others. Historical sources and genetic testing have shown that the rulers of the Sui and Tang dynasties were Han Chinese on the paternal side and had Xianbei ancestry on the maternal side, and used Han Chinese language and Han Chinese names. The fact that the original Xianbei were conquered in wars with the Han Dynasty and eventually became vassals of the Han Dynasty and began to learn extensively about Han culture as well as use Han names and use Han administrative systems in the centuries that followed is one of the reasons why the Xianbei were able to grow. On this basis, the Sinicized Xianbei were able to intermarry extensively with the Han in the north. The rulers of the Sui Dynasty and the Tang Dynasty were Han Chinese men married to Xianbei women. And since ancient China was patriarchal, no one would think that a union with another ethnic group in a situation where the father was Han would appear to be perceived as being of another ethnic group, and this was not only true in ancient China, but also basically true in other parts of the world as well.
The fathers of the Sui and Tang royal families were Han Chinese, and their mothers were of grassland descent. This was the first period of great ethnic integration in Chinese history. The Han nationality is a patriarchal nation, so they only recognize the paternal line and do not recognize the matrilineal line.
@@butterflies655 definately no what? The blondness come from Swedes. Finland used to be Sweden. But the Russians Sovieys and mongols introduced an asian component
Pinpointing ethnic identity would be de-clouded IF we would stick to ancient protocol of focusing on the PATERNAL LINE. Modern-day ideals insist on including the maternal line, when in the past, FOR THOUSANDS and THOUSANDS of years, a person identity was ALWAYS reckoned by WHO THEIR "FATHER" WAS, never the mother, unless she was the daughter of a notable, or had accomplished something noteworthy herself. If we looked down the PATERNAL LINE of Emperor Wu, we would likely see that he was MONGOLIAN.
Haplogroup C, doesnt surprise me much considering Haplogroup Group Cs long presence in the region and its persistence in certain regions to this day. Its the oldest Haplogroup out of Africa
In the first, it is natural because the ruling ethnic groups of the Xia-Shang-Zhou representative ancient empires of China, are not modern Chinese. In addition, the Xianbei claimed to be the people of the Yan Dynasty themselves, and the symbolism of the Yan Dynasty is a swallow. Since the swallow is the symbol of the Shang Dynasty and the Shang Dynasty is Haplo C, the results of the genetic analysis may be surprising to Westerners, but the Chinese manipulating historical books and non-Chinese against historical manipulation are very natural. And even though they are said to be from the northeast, it is an inaccurate expression, and East Asians have a more accurate and rational interpretation based on records. Since there is a lot of writing, in the first place, a swallow or a black bird, and a crow are a common symbol of Xia and the Shang Dynasty, and in the first place, Xia's process of destruction and Shang’s process of destruction are exactly the same. That is because the process of the destruction of Xia is a fake story created by the slave Chinese people, who founded the Han Dynasty. ++This is why the ancient Song Dynasty incident was also attributed to the reason. Since Xia has something to do with Korea's Buyeo, the Shang Dynasty in the northeast has moved, not its original position.
The indigenous history of Korea is Samhan. Did you know that? Buyeo was an invading race. Poor Koreans, even with that, you still cannot change the fact that you have continuously failed and been insignificant throughout history.🤣
@@陈早评 Who is the Korean you are talking about? Do you study the records of the original books, not the history that the Chinese roughly learn? 1. Why is Han三韓 the same as the Chinese inland Han韓? 2. Do you admit that the records of the fall of the Xia and Shang Dynasty were fabricated? 3. Han三韓 originated from Gija Joseon, and the Gija(Jizi) is Shang Line, and you say Samhan三韓 is an indigenous person. So, you mean, you agree with the yucky ethnic reproduce needs of Chinese historians who want to manipulate the Shang immigrants into Korea's "Indigenous people"?
And for anyone who doesn't understand, I think ancient Chinese 以夷伐夷 is really insidious. (以夷伐夷 : to use foreigners to subdue foreigners (idiom); let the barbarians fight it out among themselves (traditional policy of successive dynasties))
Totally noses. Modern archaeology proves the origin of Chinese characters in the Shang Dynasty. If the rulers of the Shang Dynasty were your relatives, why did Chinese characters not be discovered in the peninsula region until 1500 years later? Belief is easy to spread, Do two kind people belong to one nation if they have same kind of belief? Are Koreans a branch of the Han people cz you guys study Chinese characters, the Han system, and Confucianism? Your logic is fk ridiculous.
Why does any kingdom that occupy current China territory is considered Chinese? Does Eastern Roman emperors of Byzantine Empire considered Turkish ethnicity since they were in current Turkish territory? China wasn’t even called China thousands of years ago. Most Chinese Dynasties are not even Chinese but neighboring invaders occupying central plain. Major one is Yuan Dynasty. It is Mongolian Dynasty occupying central plain of modern China. Emperor Wu of Xianbei was 60% NorthEastern Asian, 30% of DNA marker also found in modern Chinese doesn’t make him a Chinese. If anything, Emperor Wu is genetically closer to Mongolians, Koreans and Japanese. IMHO all Chinese came from Malay or Vietnamese people group mixed with Northern nomadic steppe people possibly through kidnapped woman from central plain during raid.
The Chinese dynasties of Shang Dynasty are C, Zhou Dynasty are N, Qin Dynasty are O2, Han Dynasty are O2, Wei Dynasty are C, Yuan Dynasty are C, and Qing Dynasty are also C. Do we have to deny Chinese history for the sake of overseas Chinese? The emperor in the video beat the nomads even more ruthlessly, snatched the sheep of the nomads, and arrested people and sold them.
@@小灵子-z3h O-mf14479 is the gene of your Chinese people who lied that they were Qin, not the Qin dynasty 公族. For example, that Zhao surname, who claims the Qin dynasty descendant, has the largest proportion of that O-mf14479, and even the second-largest gene among Zhao is Haplo Q. And Han surname known as that your Chinese immigrants manipulated history on the Korean Peninsula so that the country name Han of China's inland was manipulated into the ethnic name Han of the Korean Peninsula, and that it is a fake name created by historical manipulation through “exaggeration” and “disregard of logic” among your Chinese records. Also, a website created by the Chinese, who have falsified history books time and time again because of their disgusting desire to just about reproduce, has researched about only 10 people claiming to be Qin descendent in modern times, and has even included a pure Chinese surname like Han who had nothing to do with the immigrant Qin.
@@jaehyunpark3834 The Q chromosome of the Song Dynasty is a guess. Later, the tomb of the younger brother of the Song Dynasty emperor was dug up and it was O2. The Chinese emperors all had OCN chromosomes. No Q chromosome emperor tomb has been found so far.
Interesting to see he did not have ant Royal blood yet he was an Emperor normally they would have a RHO blood ancestor out of all those concubines no RHO offspring inbreeding was common in fear of changing the appearance of the people, the Egyptians had many wives and their appearance changed after a number of dynasties from Red to Brown and incest became common for a number of dynasties mahing the Faces more oriental in some dynasties the people looked Korean or japanese the Pharaoh has many wives sent to him from other parts of the world he had children with them, the Emperors did not want to change their appearance hence they don't have the Royal Adams blood RHO,
all those chinese and its diaspora are mongol descendents.. they are the gog and magog.. the siberia is their starting land then they moved south.. invading other kingdoms, assimilating other cultures as theirs, taking their rivals identity..
The closest similarities in DNA with the Chinese are actually the Tibetans, not the Siberian. Ancient legendary people like The Great Yu also originated from the north west region. No doubt some came from Siberia, but the ruling class were known to be from the west and not east. The founding rulers of ancient Yan, Lu, Qi countries were sent from Zhou capital (present day Sha'anxi) to conquest those eastern areas.
Unexpected? How? The Han Dynasty created the Han people. How is it that the Han Emperors were not Han himself? It doesn't matter where he came from. They did not rule over the Han people more than the American presidents rules over Americans. Before the Han Dynasty, the Han people did not even exist as unified people. The fact was the Han people were not a puristic ethnicity. It was a multi ethnic confederation that were unified under the Han Empire. Han, not Qin, because the Han Empire did not subjugate them. They were proud to be Han. The Cantonese were not Han originally but the Viet people, and those who did not want to join became known as the Vietnamese, literally the Southern Viet. Yet they considered themselves to be Han for 2000 years and synonymous with Han Chinese all around the world nowadays. If the Cantonese were not happy to be Han, they had many chance to rejoin Vietnamese as dynasties fell through the 2000 years. The Vietnamese ARE still around as a non Han people after 2000 years. Yet they still choose to be Chinese and not Viet, Han especially. Of course as always, there are minority numbers who always disagree.
This is not Emperor Wu of Han, but Emperor Wu of Northern Wei, they were completely different man from different era. Wu is just a title of Emperors, and most dynasty had a emperor with this title. The people of nanyue spoke a para kra thai language, related to Thai . Vietnamese belonged to the South Asian language family and had no connection with Thai.
He is only emperor of northern China, not south China. In south China we had the ‘pure’ (can’t find a better word) Han ruling dynasty. It doesn’t matter now since basically all Xianbei descendants are Han Chinese anyways, despite their nomad origins.
Americans also played a pivotal role in modern Chinese history, from gunboat diplomacy, Opium to embedding themselves in the Chinese civil war. They changed the future of China and Taiwan. And continue to affect the politics of contemporary China. This would be an interesting video.
Mongols are given too much credit. They didn’t come onto historical stage until 13th century. Even after that majority of the army of mongolian army was Turkic peoples.
as an identity, yes, 13th century, but the people's history is older. And population majority ain't mean shit. Mongols ain't receiving enough credit imo, they've been given too much credit for just a period of time, gotta scatter it to whole history, and it's even.
What i know is that Turkic peoples are mongolians as well, all they folks that came from central and eastern part of Asia is considered Mongolian, even Hungarians and Bulgarians are even tho they don't look like Asian people at all, but their ancestors are so we still consider them as that, so maybe Mongols themselfs didn't do much but their nacions did much.
@@izemrasenchenini here we go, another comment from person who think he knows everything, dude i know who Turks, Hungarians and Bulgarians are don't teach me.
@@miloscarapic4502 I never said you know nothing bruh, its obvious that we're talking about mongolic gang and you brought up some other kind of people I never thought I know everything lmao, chill, I don't need to know everything to correct you now shut yo ass
When the Manchus attacked Xinjiang, they cut off the penises of all the male descendants of the Fatima tribe in Xinjiang and took the women into the palace. Then you say they are all Turks.😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
The Hans are are are completely eastern Iranian,, know Afghan by theirs name and nature,,, han and hepthtelites are are same, and hepthtelites tribe are existing by the name of Abdali, Abdalo,
How desperate do you have to be to claim that he wasn’t Han Chinese? Do you not have your own history to be proud of? It’s pathetic. It comes off as being desperate.
Can you please do an episode on the DNA of the Xiongnu or the HUNS? They had such a profound impact on China and European history that their stories deserve to be more well-known
Xiongnu were a mixed people. So, it is likely that they have Huns,Mongolian,Inuit, Central Asia DNA.
Hun means barbarian i.e. not Chinese. Chinese called themselves 'Han'. İ went to China 6 times.
From Türkiye (Turkey)
@@Muuu-x7hand
The 2 post comments
Did someone write incorrectly?
In ancient Chinese writing, Xiong-nu was written as Hun-nu. The suffix nu means rude in ancient Chinese. Naturally, the ancient Chinese used to insult all other non-Chinese countries like this. So the nomads who lived north of China were called Hun/Hon. And we know that in European history they are called Huns
In ancient Chinese writing, Xiong-nu was written as Hun-nu. The suffix nu means rude in ancient Chinese. Naturally, the ancient Chinese used to insult all other non-Chinese countries like this. So the nomads who lived north of China were called Hun/Hon. And we know that in European history they are called Huns
2:48 The same mistake is in all videos which mention the Mongols. Those eagle-hunters wearing red tymaqs (caps) ARE KAZAKHS, a Turkic people, and not Mongols of today! The Khalkha Mongols' national clothes is different and they don't have eagle-hunting.
Kazakhstan was conquered by Mongols, their DNA has been altered by Mongols DNA through gang grapes and genocide of turkic Kazakh males.
Cry a river
@@nikot4410 not being ignorant and calling out people for spreading misinformation is not crying.
@@ashesofhopesinabonfireofdr6341 Cry an ocean
@@barguttobed you're the only one crying in this thread 🤷♂️.
Very nice and interesting video, big thanks for your work Decimali! I'm very curious about getting G25 coordinates of Emperor Wu sample may i ask you sharing it with me?
Thanks! Here are the coords.
Emperor_Wu:H12501,0.031608,-0.424216,0.061312,-0.038216,-0.039946,-0.030717,0.012314,0.015394,0.008528,0.018498,-0.052348,-0.002319,0.003222,0.001133,-0.005686,-0.004987,0.000427,0.000517,0.001525,0.012241,-0.003295,-0.001868,-0.016174,0.002682,0.010255
Decimali videos are always a treat
This channel needs more subscribers
Excellent video! Maybe in the future you could do analysis on Minoans?
I think it is interesting, that the Mongolians did not become insignificant but survived in China as a great civilization of leaders.
Nice results, as always great content. Can you do any baltic tribe samples?😊
Joe Biden remembers eating noodles with Emperor Wu. No joke!
Biden taught him how to use chopsticks.
@@gerardmichaelburnsjr. Biden also counted to infinity - twice. While Trump fails before he reaches ten.
C2 y haplogroup means he is also common with indigenous people in east America!
Right, on family tree his specific clade of C2 share 11k BCE commun ancestor with Chief Pontiac of Ottawa tribe
@@barguttobed in 18k BCE they have started rice cultivation back in Korea. I wonder if they have anything in rice in precolumbia era?
@@HkgHkg-gu3rd more accurate research is needed for you case
@@jaehyunpark3834 you mean the Pontiac c2? Back in a few years ago, I have a Thailand friend native whose dna checked got her fall into Pontiac native in America. It turns out her third generation ancestors settled in Thailand. Few generations back from Yangzi river. And probably a few more back slipped through the Ming end of Mongol ethnic cleansing when a few more generations and centuries back from Siberia joining the ethnic Xongnu and Avers. No. It’s not imaginary. Now the Thailand natives have been living in America Midwest cities for more than 60 years, it looks like they are very close to those living in reserves a few miles away from them. After a thousand years apart. If you look at some genealogy of First Nations, they are surprisingly complete. You could trace some of their European ancestors back in Brittany around 1300 and even the same period ancestors in Blackfoot tribes on the rockies and Cherokee in the east. And then some became French speaking in the cities and came back to live on reserves. And later get forced their children to live on residence schools in the West coast and then moved to the USA and some do come back to stay between city and reserve . This is life for them and lots of them to.
@@jaehyunpark3834 no research is needed. the native americans having mongolian C2 is accepted by anyone who is familiar with this halogroup. it is also seen in DNA reveal videos on youtube of native americans. One, i watched earlier today. Surprising is that the indigenous in minnesotta have very high neanderthal. I thought neanderthals were closer to northern europeans. hmmm
Please do a video about the Ainu and the Tarim Basin Mummies and their connection to the First People and First Nation of the Ameticas. Thank you!
Can you do one of the goths? The origins of them are unclear but there own legend (jordanes) said that they came from southern scandinavia so I'm curious if that's the case
There were some investigations about. They came from scandinavia and settled for some time at the today polish shores of the baltic sea. The name of the island Gotland is for a reason. Also the name of the city Göteborg at the river Göta älv. There is besides the DNA samples also a cultural continuity between the people from Gotland and later the polish shores of the baltic sea by archeological findings.
You don't have his corpse.. How did you get his DNA?? Or is this speculation?
He mailed it in, LOL. I don't trust these DNA tests even if they used his hair.
actually scientists do have his sceletal elements excavated from his tomb
They don't have Abraham's either or Jacobs
Typical Wewuzkangz but Europeans doing it to east asians to culture vulture.
@@JUBY11RAM yet... If they were real people and not myths.
How about the ancient people moved over centuries slowly from west snd north into whst we call Mongolia today and kept settling farther east and south, came from nort direction due to mountains and the need for water amd rain for grass and hourses
Good jop man. Excellent work , you do this
你真的思想你是人同一的好像中国人是否亚洲人吗？
@@balkanic1971 Çinli değilim ama Anadolu'da 1000 yıl geçirince sizin gibi batı Avrasya işe yaramaz genlerle hala 6.9 eastern step, 2.9 yellow river farmers genomu hala varsa kanimizda ve haplogroup Q olunca Türk kökenli olduğunu söyleyebiliriz
Q haplogrubu Türk değil Kızılderili
Q haplogrubu en çok kizilderililerde görülüyor Orta Asyayla alakası senin mantığına göre İngilizlerde Türk yada Kızılderili oluyor.
3:27 The reconstruction Wu looks pretty similar to the painted one just younger and beardless 1:50
Are you excited for the My heritage DNA update?
There's going to be an update on Myheritage?
Nice video, but frankly, there's nothing unexpected here. I teach Classical Chinese, and could have given you roughly the same information (without the haplogroup terminology) just from the history books. The idea that he was poisoned or killed never gained much currency, and if you look at that general period, 36 years old was not really that young. A lot of emperors died in their twenties. Even most of the Tang emperors died in their 40s.
BTW, he was not given the title Wu until after he died. He's really a fascinating character, totally controlled by his uncle for the first 18 years of his reign. Then he became the only emperor in Chinese history to murder a dominating official personally. When he judged the time right, he distracted his uncle, and clobbered him over the head.
Well done.
so he was almost full Mongolian?
Wu Zhao (624-705), also known as Empress Wu Zetian, was the first and only woman emperor of China.
Is this a conspiracy theory? What is the evidence?proof
3:40 I am Korean. His face can be commonly seen in our neighborhood. Ancient Koreans fought a lot with the Xianbei tribe. And Khitan is a descendant of the Xianbei tribe. Korea also fought fiercely against the Khitans.
you koreans claiming everything was korean.....
K pop has messed up your mind.....without USA, S Korea is nothing....
that's because y'all have common phenotypes lmao, duh
@@izemrasenchenini that's so true! I can't tell koreans apart. they all look like brothers and sisters from the same parents.
@@yodaichi888 naw I can distinguish them from southern chinese, most japanese, and most siberians but eastern mongols, manchus, etc. looks just like koreans
HIS NAME IS 宇文邕
宇文=SURNAME
邕=GIVEN NAME
HIS COUNTRY IS NORTH ZHOU（北周）. HE IS CALLED EMPEROR WU（武帝）. HIS RACE IS 鮮卑. 鮮卑 IS A NOMADIC PEOPLE IN THE NORTHERN CHINA. THE HAN CHINESE CALL THEM, THE PEOPLE ON THE HORSES（馬上民族）
A large percentage of Northern Han Chinese have Mongolic origin, so it is probably incorrect to say the DNA results were unexpected. It would be unexpected if he had European origin, but not Mongolic
Northern Han Chinese have very little Mongolic blood, they are over 90% Yellow river farmers descendants with some southeast Asian
@@barguttobed You have a wrong biased opinion
@@eugenic12 No biased opinions only facts
@@barguttobedThe Xianbei(after kithai) are not a people of the modern Republic of Mongolia(mongol), but are a stream of pan mongolic people. And they were assimilated into the Han Chinese ethnicity society in northern China and Mongolia over a period of 1,000 years. That is why the northern Chinese people are greatly influenced by Mongolian genes.
Mongolic and Northen Han were same people, the different geological terrain and climate can made little bit variation
Technically he wasn’t Mongolian because Mongolia did not exist during his time. Xianbei were the ancestors to the mongols. Northern Zhou was a dynasty founded by nomadic tribes that abandoned their nomadic lifestyle adopted Chinese culture after the chaos caused by the 3 kingdoms period caused a vacuum of power in the north of China .
Mongolia was always exist, his Y haplogroup, his dynasty supports the emperor was a mongolian. Recorded xianbei language is also mongolian. Farmer populations were always been weak for steppe nomads.
Nope, it was the Jin dynasty that caused chaos. They left too weak to defend their border so the steppe people started invaded central plain territory
@@postachamdi6286 Don't be ridiculous. The Xianbei were originally vassals of the Han Dynasty. After the fall of the Han Dynasty, China fell into a 200-year-long civil war, with a sharp decline in population and depletion of national strength. The royal family was all killed, and a power vacuum appeared. Then the Xianbei claimed to be the orthodox descendants of the Han people and joined the Chinese civil war under the banner of reviving the Han Dynasty.
@@神可汗yeah except the Sima or Chen or Liu Song are the established Han. Therefore Xianbei are the pretender. They aren't Han. Yes they are Chinese maybe genetically and stretching linguistically but not really Chinese. Because they opposed the Han Chinese Emperor of the South. Therefore not really Chinese. Its complicated.
@@stump4522 China has always been a diverse country. Why are those who oppose the Southern Han emperor not true Chinese? They are not against Han culture. Chinese people value cultural identity, not genetic identity.
Mongolic nations have really long history over rulling various Chinese dynasties. Even Aisin Gioro clan that ruled late Jin and Qing dynasties carried C3b1a3a2-F8951 haplogroup associated with Mongolic but not Tungusic people.
Также были тюркские и как ты уже упомянул маньчжурская династия Цинь
@@Scythian_nomad Я упомянул маньчжурскую династию Цинь потому что у ее правящего клана Айсин Гиоро монгольская гаплогруппа, так что скорее верхушка по происхождению они монгольская(отчасти), а так сами маньчжуры не монголы конечно.
@user-mm7zi4ue7dахахаха Xirong or Rong были азиатами, а не иранцами. Скорее всего они были носителями линий N1C1 и были родственны самодийцам и никогда не были во власти предков Хань. Горные Xirong были ассимилированы племенами Дун-Ху и позднее были известны как Урианхай
The Mongolian nation has been part of China for a long time. Xianbei was originally a vassal state of the Jin Dynasty. After the War of the Eight Princes, all the heirs to the throne of the Chinese dynasty died. The northern nomads (Southern Xiongnu, Xianbei) as vassals naturally also participated in the fight for the throne. It can be seen from the portraits that they were very Chinese and not at all like today's Outer Mongolians. Outer Mongolians should return to China instead of abandoning their ancestors
@@dadlight3783 Это же наша гапла хори бурятская. У Урианхай монголов вроде С2 а не N1C1
Nice video! So, he was Xianbei, North East Asian.
it's more accurate to say he was Han-Xianbei mix, he was a Chinese emperor first
Northern Zhou - Sui - Tang (change of regimes through aristocratic coup, regardless of their subjective cultural identity, they all have Xianbei ancestry).
I just wonder how it is unexpected when it matches where he was coming from?
It's "unexpected" that the DNA profile of an ancient Chinese emperor is broadly similar to modern Northeast Asians? Talk about click bait. Thumbs down!
Amazing 😍
I have a question for the experts
I did dna test
Some stated i have y dna I1
Yet another said n p43
Stating although i have 8 snp I markers the most recent and next to.most recent are both N
N p43 being most recent
Who is correct ?? Thank you
Thank you.
how do you acquire these ancient samples?
Chinese are well aware of Sinicised tribes like Xianbei and many others.
Xianbei DNA is fascinating
Decimali !! Selçuk lu sultanı birinci Tuğrul veya Alparslan veya Melikşah hangisi olursa onlarında yüzlerini canlandır, şimdiden teşekkür ederim.
Süleyman şahın dnası ne zaman yayınlanır. Kemikler incelendi. Biliyorum.
@@meralkeskin8511 Süleyman şah ın mezarı bulundu mu , caber kalesindeki mezar kime ait çözüldümü ? Halep kapısı deniyor gerçekten oradamı yoksa temsilimi bunları çıkıp bir tarihçi prof açıklamıyor.
You keep misunderstanding what the "ethnicity" tests really are about. You confuse _similarity_ (which the DNA tests can tell) with history (which the DNA tests cannot tell.)
これはとても興味深い
I wonder if he has any links to the ainu of japan. There was a study of the ainu and they detected a mysterious siberian admixture. Could his people be the missing link.🤔
You literally just showed the mountain that is in Italy.
🇲🇳💪🏻
Bot
This is Northeast Asian Mongolia, not Khalkha Mongolia. Northeast Asian Mongolia is Chinese
🇪🇬 🇱🇾 🇨🇳 🇵🇸 🇮🇶 🇹🇯 lands of
Civilizations
Also ancient russia isnt even remotely European, it was after 1300 when the slavs colonized Siberia, get your facts checked.
Proto indo Europeans Ancestors of slavs lived in Siberia TF Are you yappin about stfu
Search arkaim
Qing rulers were Manchurians not Mongolians nor Han Chinese.
The result makes sense because Northern Zhou was a government by non-Han Chinese. But all of them has Han Chinese in them. The Han Chinese and the Hu or “barbarians” were all from the same stock originally.
They're not though lmao you kidding? Unless you mean they come from the same stock the same way every one technically 'comes from the same stock' if you go back far enough.
@user-mm7zi4ue7d do you know about Chinese Han dynasty? The concept of Han started then, over a thousand years ago.
@@Haijwsyz51846As a state, not a people.
@@BBarNavi correct. Han originated as a state, but now as a culture. It has never really been as a people.
@gabaghoul__ Ethnic names always refer to slightly different constitutions of people over time. Xianbei was sinicized and eventually incorporated into ancient Han, while modern Han people is a conglomeration of those ancient tribes that have "disappeared" in the history. This is similar to Uyghurs. Ancient Uyghurs were mostly northeastern asians but migrated into Tarim basin and intermarried with local Tocharians and began to have more European features.
At the end of day, names are names, and we can't confused names used at one time with same names but used for different times.
DNA cannot determined one's ethnicity as ethnicity men race and culture. And how did u obtain his DNA and know that it was his?
Wow interesting
Wonder why the reconstruction does not have facial hair like in his ancient portrait depiction.😎
is there a secret oath of you "researchers" to not name any Turkic in your "research" you all did? When there's strong Turkic evidence involved, they quickly speak of "speculation" or "might be" or as we got used to it "Mongolian". Mongolia was largely inhabitted by Turkic tribes for a very long time till genghis khan came in. Even our legendary city is somewhere there "Otuken", Erghenekhon etc etc
What is even a turk ?
Mongols yes
Race and language
But turks don't have 1 race and many difference between even kipchak and qarluk
@@JoeBidet-yb5erلان الجينات اثبتت انكم مجرد يونانيين وايرانيين 😂😂
@@GBnvi-uh6si sorry I can't read Arabic
The mountains are India
nice
🇲🇳🇨🇳🙏🏽
3 % of what ........
Anyway thank you for interesting and educating video
Love from Finland
The Xianbei used several names, including Northern Zhou, so it's probably 3%. Before this genetic research, it was unclear for me, but the Xianbei were descended from the Shang dynasty, a dynasty that preceded the Zhou.
The haplogroup of Zhou aristocrats found in Zhou ruins is confirmed to be N, so it's 3%. Plus, many modern Chinese claim to be descendants of Zhou royalty, because after the decline of the Zhou dynasty, their slaves Chinese grew up with the development of agriculture and technology, and falsified history to call themselves Zhou. And that's where the Chinese started, by falsifying history to call themselves as a different ethnic. Its long time tradition of Chinese.
@@jaehyunpark3834 You are spewing lies. Though you repeat thousand times, lies are lies.
@@ddding9518 (↑↑↑ Typical Liar Chinese Scream)
@@jaehyunpark3834 lol You'd better learn history and science before spewing lies
@@ddding9518
Chinese: He's lying!
I'm Chinese, so I'm right!!!
(Rationale: with no evidence)
He:
(Rationale: Claim based on scientific and historical evidence)
How does this guy get a chinese emperor's dna lol? Would be nice if he at least explained this. It all seems like speculation to me
China itself is many warring states nation . therefore it makes sense to split up into many states like it once was. And its scary to have a one goverment...like today being too powerful. There are ethnic people and nationality within China itself. But the goverment just mute, imprison, any dissent.
Not true. They are very celebrated. I'm one of them
Rubbish ! The 55 minority ethnicities of today's China have all their human rights protected under the PRC Constitution since 1954. Go do some research before you parrot the CIA, NED & MSM & their puppets in the ETIM & World Uyghur Congress...
It's as if the Vietnamese government does not suppress the independence of ethnic minorities. hypocrite😂
Xianbei is not same origin like mongol people
Xianbei is confederation state lika hunnu and Scythians but just The ruling class was a mongol.
Xianbei actually like
Mongol-Turco state like a tabgach state
This is my opinions but its true :D.
Isn't he still dead? Did you have to get permission from his Indian descendants to extract his DNA?
❤❤❤
So what Mongol. Manchu , Chinese all Orientals same race different ethnicities, like the Saxons and the Celts . So what, what is the insinuation here ?
@LanguagesPro-ei9lh You need to show credible source Einstein, o/w you could be pulling that from your ass.
@LanguagesPro-ei9lh you need to show a source Einstein
The mentioned groups, including the Mongols, Manchu, Chinese, Saxons, and Celts, are claimed to be descendants of Japheth, sometimes called Japheth-Nese, a name that echoes Japanese. Ashkenaz, also known as Ashkuz, and his uncle Meshech, who had offspring named Ya and Vuza, are thought to be ancestors of the Yakuza. Additionally, he is considered a progenitor of the Russians, who engaged in conflict with the Japanese between 1904 and 1905.
@@projectreracccty4764 OMG where's your head ? In your own back side ?
@LanguagesPro-ei9lh yes Xianbei etc are not Chinese, he is Han-Xianbei mixed ancestry
Turks are strange,Historically, Xianbei people and Mongols，Manchus slaughtered Turks, but Turks said Xianbei people, Mongols and Manchus were Turks. 19th century, Russians also suppressed and slaughter Turks. Are Russians Turks?
Stockholm syndrome. When you call your Oppressor Daddy 😂
@@stump4522 true，When the Mongols went west, they slaughtered a large number of Turks. Today, many Turks firmly believe that Genghis Khan is a Turk.They are proud of the Mongolian Empire, and think that during the Yuan Dynasty in China, Turks ruled China.
Turks are Iranian hybrid @@fredcheng2736
Turks are Iranian hybrid @@fredcheng2736
@@Faizal723 Turks carry more than other dna related to Iranian genes.
I believe the Chinese who lived in Beijing are mixed with Mongols
You only glorify and portray war conquerors portray those who suffered from the occupiers and who were exterminated by evil nations or evil religions.
Please do about south india - Tamil
100% Indian. Dravidezed tribals
Northern Zhou, Sui, and Tang..all of those dynasties are constructed by XIanbei, nothern steppe origin nomadic people who spoke NOT CHINESE but steppe Altaic language or Mongol-Tungusic language. Their rivalry with real Chinese-Han dates back to Han dynasty. Their conquest of China was response to Han Dynasty's evasion to Northern Steppe Xiongnu confederation, Donghu.
False historical statements only mislead others. Historical sources and genetic testing have shown that the rulers of the Sui and Tang dynasties were Han Chinese on the paternal side and had Xianbei ancestry on the maternal side, and used Han Chinese language and Han Chinese names.
The fact that the original Xianbei were conquered in wars with the Han Dynasty and eventually became vassals of the Han Dynasty and began to learn extensively about Han culture as well as use Han names and use Han administrative systems in the centuries that followed is one of the reasons why the Xianbei were able to grow.
On this basis, the Sinicized Xianbei were able to intermarry extensively with the Han in the north. The rulers of the Sui Dynasty and the Tang Dynasty were Han Chinese men married to Xianbei women. And since ancient China was patriarchal, no one would think that a union with another ethnic group in a situation where the father was Han would appear to be perceived as being of another ethnic group, and this was not only true in ancient China, but also basically true in other parts of the world as well.
Nah way back, steppe and central plain people had beef way back during warring states period.
this is revisionist history, they had Xianbei on the maternal line, he was clearly Chinese in every way
The fathers of the Sui and Tang royal families were Han Chinese, and their mothers were of grassland descent. This was the first period of great ethnic integration in Chinese history.
The Han nationality is a patriarchal nation, so they only recognize the paternal line and do not recognize the matrilineal line.
they banned speaking Xianbei language since the year of 495 AD
their very own sinicization policy
doesnt meant he came from finland, what it means is that some finns have mongolian ancestors
Definitely no. Just look at them. Finns are the blondiest ppl in the world.
@@butterflies655 definately no what? The blondness come from Swedes. Finland used to be Sweden. But the Russians Sovieys and mongols introduced an asian component
@@butterflies655many finns and saami have slanted eyes. Uralic people came from siberia. they werent blonde originally
I don't know about chinese but mongols have blond hair too. Chengis Khan had red hair and blue eyes according to chinese sources
@@rebellefleur2993 that was almost a thousand years ago... that is not what they look like today ...
Xiānbēi : Goths of Asia.
yeah they were sinicized people living on the edge of China
😊😊😊😊
Pinpointing ethnic identity would be de-clouded IF we would stick to ancient
protocol of focusing on the PATERNAL LINE.
Modern-day ideals insist on including the maternal line, when in the past,
FOR THOUSANDS and THOUSANDS of years, a person identity was ALWAYS
reckoned by WHO THEIR "FATHER" WAS, never the mother, unless she was
the daughter of a notable, or had accomplished something noteworthy herself.
If we looked down the PATERNAL LINE of Emperor Wu, we would likely see that
he was MONGOLIAN.
Haplogroup C, doesnt surprise me much considering Haplogroup Group Cs long presence in the region and its persistence in certain regions to this day. Its the oldest Haplogroup out of Africa
Viking :)
In the first, it is natural because the ruling ethnic groups of the Xia-Shang-Zhou representative ancient empires of China, are not modern Chinese.
In addition, the Xianbei claimed to be the people of the Yan Dynasty themselves, and the symbolism of the Yan Dynasty is a swallow. Since the swallow is the symbol of the Shang Dynasty and the Shang Dynasty is Haplo C, the results of the genetic analysis may be surprising to Westerners, but the Chinese manipulating historical books and non-Chinese against historical manipulation are very natural.
And even though they are said to be from the northeast, it is an inaccurate expression, and East Asians have a more accurate and rational interpretation based on records.
Since there is a lot of writing, in the first place, a swallow or a black bird, and a crow are a common symbol of Xia and the Shang Dynasty, and in the first place, Xia's process of destruction and Shang’s process of destruction are exactly the same. That is because the process of the destruction of Xia is a fake story created by the slave Chinese people, who founded the Han Dynasty.
++This is why the ancient Song Dynasty incident was also attributed to the reason.
Since Xia has something to do with Korea's Buyeo, the Shang Dynasty in the northeast has moved, not its original position.
The indigenous history of Korea is Samhan. Did you know that? Buyeo was an invading race. Poor Koreans, even with that, you still cannot change the fact that you have continuously failed and been insignificant throughout history.🤣
Here is a very typical Korean, from the country that claims to be the origin of the universe.
@@陈早评 Who is the Korean you are talking about?
Do you study the records of the original books, not the history that the Chinese roughly learn?
1. Why is Han三韓 the same as the Chinese inland Han韓?
2. Do you admit that the records of the fall of the Xia and Shang Dynasty were fabricated?
3. Han三韓 originated from Gija Joseon, and the Gija(Jizi) is Shang Line, and you say Samhan三韓 is an indigenous person. So, you mean, you agree with the yucky ethnic reproduce needs of Chinese historians who want to manipulate the Shang immigrants into Korea's "Indigenous people"?
And for anyone who doesn't understand, I think ancient Chinese 以夷伐夷 is really insidious.
(以夷伐夷 : to use foreigners to subdue foreigners (idiom); let the barbarians fight it out among themselves (traditional policy of successive dynasties))
Totally noses.
Modern archaeology proves the origin of Chinese characters in the Shang Dynasty. If the rulers of the Shang Dynasty were your relatives, why did Chinese characters not be discovered in the peninsula region until 1500 years later?
Belief is easy to spread, Do two kind people belong to one nation if they have same kind of belief? Are Koreans a branch of the Han people cz you guys study Chinese characters, the Han system, and Confucianism? Your logic is fk ridiculous.
Araştırmaları başka başka ırklar yapmalı. Batı kaynakları güvenilmez
Why does any kingdom that occupy current China territory is considered Chinese? Does Eastern Roman emperors of Byzantine Empire considered Turkish ethnicity since they were in current Turkish territory?
China wasn’t even called China thousands of years ago. Most Chinese Dynasties are not even Chinese but neighboring invaders occupying central plain. Major one is Yuan Dynasty. It is Mongolian Dynasty occupying central plain of modern China. Emperor Wu of Xianbei was 60% NorthEastern Asian, 30% of DNA marker also found in modern Chinese doesn’t make him a Chinese. If anything, Emperor Wu is genetically closer to Mongolians, Koreans and Japanese.
IMHO all Chinese came from Malay or Vietnamese people group mixed with Northern nomadic steppe people possibly through kidnapped woman from central plain during raid.
The Chinese dynasties of Shang Dynasty are C, Zhou Dynasty are N, Qin Dynasty are O2, Han Dynasty are O2, Wei Dynasty are C, Yuan Dynasty are C, and Qing Dynasty are also C. Do we have to deny Chinese history for the sake of overseas Chinese? The emperor in the video beat the nomads even more ruthlessly, snatched the sheep of the nomads, and arrested people and sold them.
@@小灵子-z3h Qin is not O2, it's Q. And if you claim O2 because of the rumors of a Lü Buwei, you're really stupid.
@@jaehyunpark3834 Qin O-MF14479
@@小灵子-z3h O-mf14479 is the gene of your Chinese people who lied that they were Qin, not the Qin dynasty 公族.
For example, that Zhao surname, who claims the Qin dynasty descendant, has the largest proportion of that O-mf14479, and even the second-largest gene among Zhao is Haplo Q.
And Han surname known as that your Chinese immigrants manipulated history on the Korean Peninsula so that the country name Han of China's inland was manipulated into the ethnic name Han of the Korean Peninsula, and that it is a fake name created by historical manipulation through “exaggeration” and “disregard of logic” among your Chinese records.
Also, a website created by the Chinese, who have falsified history books time and time again because of their disgusting desire to just about reproduce, has researched about only 10 people claiming to be Qin descendent in modern times, and has even included a pure Chinese surname like Han who had nothing to do with the immigrant Qin.
@@jaehyunpark3834 The Q chromosome of the Song Dynasty is a guess. Later, the tomb of the younger brother of the Song Dynasty emperor was dug up and it was O2. The Chinese emperors all had OCN chromosomes. No Q chromosome emperor tomb has been found so far.
FINNISH??????????????
The Uralic peoples of Finland and Northeast Asians, East Asians have a common paternal lineage
Interesting to see he did not have ant Royal blood yet he was an Emperor normally they would have a RHO blood ancestor out of all those concubines no RHO offspring inbreeding was common in fear of changing the appearance of the people, the Egyptians had many wives and their appearance changed after a number of dynasties from Red to Brown and incest became common for a number of dynasties mahing the Faces more oriental in some dynasties the people looked Korean or japanese the Pharaoh has many wives sent to him from other parts of the world he had children with them, the Emperors did not want to change their appearance hence they don't have the Royal Adams blood RHO,
3D reconstruction is not accurate at all.
前漢の第七代皇帝 武帝。
这个皇帝是鲜卑人，我们的史书里记载他是一个很厉害的帝王，只不过他的儿子太差了，最后导致我们争取到了复兴国家的机会。不过鲜卑留给我们的影响确实很大，他有汉人基因标记可能是因为当时鲜卑贵族和汉人贵族长期通婚的结果，因为他的外婆就是汉人，不过北周依然是一个鲜卑国家，和我们关系不多，因为这个国家只认可鲜卑文化。视频中的北齐虽然是鲜卑化的汉人建立的国家，但它也从来都不认可我们，所以北齐和北周一样都是鲜卑国家。
Interesting, thanks for sharing!
你看过史书吗，不认可这个说法非常不准确，应该是被迫认可
典型现代民族主义去套用古代的历史 非常扯淡
Mongolian emperor😊🇲🇳
all those chinese and its diaspora are mongol descendents.. they are the gog and magog.. the siberia is their starting land then they moved south.. invading other kingdoms, assimilating other cultures as theirs, taking their rivals identity..
The closest similarities in DNA with the Chinese are actually the Tibetans, not the Siberian. Ancient legendary people like The Great Yu also originated from the north west region. No doubt some came from Siberia, but the ruling class were known to be from the west and not east. The founding rulers of ancient Yan, Lu, Qi countries were sent from Zhou capital (present day Sha'anxi) to conquest those eastern areas.
@@kirajojo8442 是的，日本都是东南亚人，是中国宋朝的时候来渡种的，日本的原始人种身高不到1米5
@@小灵子-z3h Japanese people are not grouped with Southeast Asians on these genetic tests. Japanese people are grouped with Koreans.
@@雑草-f3d 韩国人有百分之30是O1B2，就是东南亚人基因
@@雑草-f3d th-cam.com/video/miegEzusMmc/w-d-xo.html
Unexpected? How? The Han Dynasty created the Han people. How is it that the Han Emperors were not Han himself?
It doesn't matter where he came from. They did not rule over the Han people more than the American presidents rules over Americans. Before the Han Dynasty, the Han people did not even exist as unified people.
The fact was the Han people were not a puristic ethnicity. It was a multi ethnic confederation that were unified under the Han Empire. Han, not Qin, because the Han Empire did not subjugate them. They were proud to be Han.
The Cantonese were not Han originally but the Viet people, and those who did not want to join became known as the Vietnamese, literally the Southern Viet. Yet they considered themselves to be Han for 2000 years and synonymous with Han Chinese all around the world nowadays.
If the Cantonese were not happy to be Han, they had many chance to rejoin Vietnamese as dynasties fell through the 2000 years. The Vietnamese ARE still around as a non Han people after 2000 years. Yet they still choose to be Chinese and not Viet, Han especially. Of course as always, there are minority numbers who always disagree.
I feel that cantonese called themself as Tang people.. `Tang ren` And China town is `Tang Ren street`
This is not Emperor Wu of Han, but Emperor Wu of Northern Wei, they were completely different man from different era. Wu is just a title of Emperors, and most dynasty had a emperor with this title.
The people of nanyue spoke a para kra thai language, related to Thai . Vietnamese belonged to the South Asian language family and had no connection with Thai.
@@bennyheggheim3511 that's only semantics, all Chinese people are Han, they just use Tang instead
China colonized Vietnam for nearly 1000 years. It is not that Cantonese are Vietnamese, but Vietnamese are influenced by Cantonese blood
The original Wu Mao? 🤣
He is only emperor of northern China, not south China. In south China we had the ‘pure’ (can’t find a better word) Han ruling dynasty. It doesn’t matter now since basically all Xianbei descendants are Han Chinese anyways, despite their nomad origins.
native American
6 % western steppe herder
Wow
Ahhh ... Mongorians ... shoulda known.
Americans also played a pivotal role in modern Chinese history, from gunboat diplomacy, Opium to embedding themselves in the Chinese civil war. They changed the future of China and Taiwan. And continue to affect the politics of contemporary China. This would be an interesting video.
you're comparing the last ~100 years to the past 2000 years, not even close
Mongols are given too much credit. They didn’t come onto historical stage until 13th century. Even after that majority of the army of mongolian army was Turkic peoples.
as an identity, yes, 13th century, but the people's history is older. And population majority ain't mean shit.
Mongols ain't receiving enough credit imo, they've been given too much credit for just a period of time, gotta scatter it to whole history, and it's even.
What i know is that Turkic peoples are mongolians as well, all they folks that came from central and eastern part of Asia is considered Mongolian, even Hungarians and Bulgarians are even tho they don't look like Asian people at all, but their ancestors are so we still consider them as that, so maybe Mongols themselfs didn't do much but their nacions did much.
@@miloscarapic4502 None of them were Mongolic, we're talking about Mongolic peoples
@@izemrasenchenini here we go, another comment from person who think he knows everything, dude i know who Turks, Hungarians and Bulgarians are don't teach me.
@@miloscarapic4502 I never said you know nothing bruh, its obvious that we're talking about mongolic gang and you brought up some other kind of people
I never thought I know everything lmao, chill, I don't need to know everything to correct you
now shut yo ass
Chinese lied. Their former masters weren't Chinese. All Xianbei and Turkic.
At that time, Xianbei people ruled the north and the south was ruled by Han people. You Turks always said that all rulers were Turks.😂
The chromosome that rules China is OCN, not J in Türkiye today.
You are crazy, Mongols and Manchus slaughter Turks, but you say Mongols and Manchus are Turks.
When the Manchus attacked Xinjiang, they cut off the penises of all the male descendants of the Fatima tribe in Xinjiang and took the women into the palace. Then you say they are all Turks.😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
what is this master nonsense, he was Han-Xianbei mixed ancestry, Han on his father's side, not Turkic at all
Lies!!!
The Hans are are are completely eastern Iranian,, know Afghan by theirs name and nature,,, han and hepthtelites are are same, and hepthtelites tribe are existing by the name of Abdali, Abdalo,
moğol türk
😂😂
Why do Turks always think of themselves as Mongolians? You don't even have Mongolian genes.
حقيقة الاتراك ليس لهم علاقة بالمنغول@@神可汗
How desperate do you have to be to claim that he wasn’t Han Chinese? Do you not have your own history to be proud of?
It’s pathetic. It comes off as being desperate.
it's getting more and more ridiculous, claiming that Chinese people are all Mongolian or some sort of nonsense
Mongols brother central asian turks 🇲🇳
??
Yoq
Xiangbei PPL are actualy turkic wu was basicaly descendant of maybe tuoba clan also known as tabgatch.
And unicorns too. You forgot unicorns.
@@Alghi451 Oh nesian gypys u still alive, how u doing nesoid?
It is crap!
No dear, it's science
@@barguttobed It is crap!
@@barguttobed It is crap under mask of science.
@@elenalexey Сам такой
@@barguttobed You are a chip troll.
There is no history without Turkish speaking people. They brought Sun wherever they went. Just like their language.
For real and i wonder why? Turkic people are spread over a very large part of the world. Especially the Tatars
...In a nutshell he was Turkic
68% mongol
This because proto Mongol Xianbei created this state. So this is no wonder their king turned out to be a Mongolic. 😂
How ridiculous is MH put to Viet together with Chinese, why don't you put Indian and Italian together?? Lol