Bullshit. What does 'Asian' mean. Asia is a really big continent with a vast history. There are the Tuvans, And the Tamils in the South! Fins are neither indo european nor 'East Asian'. They emerged in the Urals thousand of years ago and migrated to Finland.
The mummies in Xinjiang were not Tocharian but an isolated West Siberian population(Mix of ANEs and Baikal HGs). We have afanesievo, scythian but not a single so called tocharian sample from Xinjiang
I'd like to see more of the origins of Indo-Iranians. From Tarim basin to different tribes of Scythian confederation, Alans and their trace on Europe and north Africa.
I have noticed most of your videos somehow show ancient eurasian populations almost always exclusively related to Baltic, Celtic (Scottish-Irish), South Asian and Scandinavian modern populations. Almost no hint of e.g. germanic, italic, slavic or iranic populations, etc. Have is that possible and how could it be explained?
@@Qvadratus. Because the groups you are referring are mongol mixed, also lowest ANE, Indo-Aryans have the highest ANE among West Asians, Central Asians and South Asians.
I am Kyrgyz from Kyrgyzstan and the highest frequency of R1a z93 is in Kyrgyzstan especially among Kyrgyz in Mongolia kHoton is 83%. My paternal dna is R1a z93 and maternal M8. 49% East Asian Mongolian and Manchurian and 2% Native American; 39% east European and 8% Middleast and 2% India
@@umhvdfjkczxcgjdryjndfjobff Don’t appropriate R1a to Kyrgyz only, since Khotons people have more R1a frequency than modern Kyrgyz and it’s most likely due to bottleneck effect. Khotons are actually part of Mongolians by their culture and identity, they carry nowadays mostly Mongolian blood since they were intermixing constantly with Dorbets(Oirat tribe) from whom they took their language(Khotons spoke old Oirat dialect better than other Oirats in Mongolia influenced by Halh). Ethnically they have also non Mongolian origins but not from Kyrgyzs rather Sarts Muslim population of east Turkestan(actually known as Uyghurs), their founder ancestors athhropologically even had Pamir-Fergana subtype of race which is frequent among Uyghurs, Uzbeks, Tajiks but not Kyrgyzs who are highly east eurasian.
Keep in mind these results does not mean that the result people have the heritage of resultant area but it means the resultant area people's have their heritage. Sorry for bad english.
Sintashta is ancestral to the Andronovo Culture, which is proto Indo Iranian. 2:58 - their morphology, features and facial proportions look a lot like modern Pathans, Nuristanis, Afridis from the Khyber Pass area.
When I write 'roto Indo Iranian' I mean 1) linguistically and also partly 2) genetically. Of course the trajectory of the R1a carrying males of Sinthashta/Andronovo culture eventually took them to the place where the Proto BMAC people had settled, essentially Iranian plateau neolith males of YDNA J2, but also T1a-M170, as well as L-M20. And yes both elects mixed and then spread out outwards in both directions as both Indo aryans and then later as Iranians. but recent archeological remains from BMAC put through DNA testing, reveal a mixture of BOTH Neolithic Iranian related males (J2, T1a, G2b) AND Andronovo indo European steppe related males (R1a) contributing to later BMAC culture and its alter dispersals. Where exactly am i being 'delusional'? @@dorkinsful
I speak a language called pakhto or pashto (two main dialects). Sintashta if I divide this to two words sin and tashta, with a slight tuning Shin Tashta (or Takhta) it mean green plains. Pashto is spoken by pashtoon people though to be of aryan decent, interesting
@@jostnamane3951 me? I am a Brahmin from jammu(northern India), my ancestors were all Vedic Brahmins , and my name literally means , the brave Arya. sooo??????
A serious question. Have we discovered any inscriptions or writing symbols from the Sintashta site? If not, how do we know they were Indo-Iranian speakers?
Individual sample ID: I1086 you used as an example, could be a relative of mine based on his appearance. Being as I am, lumped into Haplogroup R1aR1b it is understandable that I have the tall face deep set eyes (hardly any eye brows), largish nose, and strong chin as this man (even have those same two creases at the top of his nose). My eyes are blue however. However, I can trace my paternal lineage back as far as the Normans although my line may have been Franks who joined the invasion of England.
Sintashta culture was deeply connected with Yamna culture directly and indirectly, so this is where the genetic affinity between these sites comes from. 🙂👌
@@jmab721 Because the Iranian migrated from Ukraine, and the government are racists, but Iran has a far better ancient history than Ukraine, they should be proud.
Not sure where Sintashta percentage of 58.6 came from ? You said Sintashta is R1a. The overwhelming majority of Celtic (Irish, Scottish and Welsh) is R1b.
The haplogrouo is just a very small part of the DNA that doesn't get mixed with time. It doesn't correlate necessarily with the autosomal DNA, which is used to measure total ancestry Almost all male Brazilians are R1b, for example, even though we are on average 20% African and 10% Amerindian
I would assume the R1b haplogroup in Brazil is directly related to the Westeren Europeans from Portugal that colonized Brazil..? Spain and Portugal is overwhelming R1b. R1a is found more in Eastern Europe and into areas of Germany. @@LucasVieira-cz6kq
@@LucasVieira-cz6kq still doesn't make sense, seeing as males dictate evolution of facial features and bloodline more than females. Because they kill off their competitors. You would think that since r1a is the predominant male bloodline, the highest percentage of common ancestry would be more in line with Eastern Europeans, rather than far western r1b in Ireland. If the 58.6% was Baltic that would have made more sense seeing as it's right next to the people with the purest r1a lineage: the polish
@@dab0331 "males dictate the evolution of facial features more than female" That's not how it works. Every child inherit half their DNA from their mother and half from their father. I will have the same haplogroup as the father of my father. But I'll have only 25% of his autosomal DNA Also, facial features don't correlate precisely with ancestry admixture.
@@LucasVieira-cz6kq yes. But NOT EVERY MAN procreates. Men die more often than women because of sickness and war. And in war the CONQUERING MEN spread their genes while the Conquered men don't. Yet both the women of the conquering tribe AND THE CONQUERED tribe reproduce. Which means the MAN'S genetics is LESS DIVERSE than the women's, and the women's genetics are still heavily influenced by their father's X chromosome. It's simple math The different races exist because they have a common PATERNAL grandfather, NOT because they have a common maternal grandmother. The genes passed on by mothers is far too varied, while the men's are not. It's not an accident than most black people have Haplogroup E as an ancestor and Europeans have ancestor R.
Closest modern population is North Swedish. I’m swedish from the north and I have no doubt that he is not closely related to any swedish people. But there is a connection and it is the corded ware people.
3000 BC, a community lived in the vicinity of Moscow (Yaroslav). This community, known today as the Fatyanavo culture, consisted entirely of individuals with R1a-Z93 y-DNA. The oldest known R1 a y-DNA sample (PES001, Veretye, 10,500 BC) is also from this region. This community migrated to Asia from 2000 BC. The ones who went to Turkestan (Srubna, Sintasha, Andronovo) became Turkicized. With the exception of the Sahas and the Dolgans, a significant part of all Turkic peoples are of this lineage. In the Kyrgyz, Bashkirs and Karachay-Balkars, this rate is over 50%. This includes Hungarians. Some have even become peoples speaking other Uralic languages. Some of them settled in today's Tajikistan, Afghanistan and Pakistan. This is the story of the Indo-Iranians, the speakers of European languages in Asia. 50% of Tajikistan and Afghanistan; 25% of Pakistan, India, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh; and 10-15% of Iran are descendants of these R1a-Z93s who came to Asia from North-Eastern Europe after 2000 BC. Any other story is a fairy tale (Caucasian Indo-Europeans, Anatolian Indo-Europeans, Central Asian Indo-Europeans, Siberian Indo-Europeans ....). Of all the Indo-Iranian peoples, it is the Iranian minorities of the Pamirs (Yagnob, Shugnan ...) who still most resemble their ancestors in Fatyanavo. From Tajikistan, Afghanistan and Pakistan, where they first arrived, the Indo-Iranians gradually spread into Iran and the interior of India, mixing and changing with the indigenous peoples of the region. The fact that Iranians and Turanians (Turks) are enemy brothers from the same ancestor (Feridun Shah), which is written in the 2 most important historical works of Iranians (Avesta and Shahnameh), which are compilations of the oral history of Iranians, may be related to this issue.The Fatyanavo culture's own siblings are the R1a-Z283 y-DNA people. They lived west of the Fatyanavo culture in the Corded Ware culture in the Baltics. They spread from the north towards Western Europe. 50% of Russians, 45% of Poles, 39% of Slovaks, 29% of Ukrainians, 22% of Norwegians, 21% of Slovenes, 17% of Icelanders, 14% of Swedes; They are descendants of R1a-Z283 y-DNAs, which are the self-siblings of the R1a-Z93 y-DNAs that went to Asia, which we see in the Corded Ware culture.
In my heritage typical Slavic classification is "Eastern European", Baltic is Baltic as it is represented by current day Baltic populations who maintain some remnants of old religions and oldest living Indo-European languages
Oh fool they are not related to you they are ancestors of modern day Indo Iranians of Iran and north India and yes they were white people nobody deny that .They got mixed with native population which turns out to be a bad decision
@@Yasa5na R2 is special for indians. R2 is mostly founds in india. Q is brother of R long time ago. Yet it doesnt means R is india. Q mostly founds in siberia and american locals. K is grandfather of R and Q.
Actually it's indo-aryans. It was changed because of the stigma dipstick Hitler put on the word Aryan. These are all part of indo-aryan(European) language groups.
@@billstream1974 I’m going to assume you’re talking to me, and I’m going to tell you a secret; what the useless academics decide to “change” what they choose to call our ancestors doesn’t change the historical reality of what these people self identified as.
Study says something else👇🏼 upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/c/c4/20160918032616%21R1a_origins_%28Underhill_2010%29_and_R1a1a_oldest_expansion_and_highest_frequency_%282014%29.jpg
@@barguttobedMost indians from central,east and South India are dravadians.Indians from northwest India are mixed Aryans and dravadians so not pure so yes definitely Indo Iranians were white people
@@IbrahimStanikzaiPastuns are white and we are dark? 😅 most people in North Central East are Indo-Aryan, while Pastuns are forgotten Israelites nothing Arya among them.
@@TobiasC-mg4zk The population of the Sintashta culture migrated to Siberia from Eastern Europe. The Sintashta culture is part of the Andronovo cultural community of the Bronze Age. Modern Slavic genetic markers (R1a-Z283/280) were already present in these populations.
@@TobiasC-mg4zkslavs have the purest amount of r1a heritage though. Poland is the purest. So it makes sense as to why the KALASH people of PAKISTAN are WHITE and look POLISH
The part you’re missing about the Sintashta of 2000 BCE is that their ancestors were the Yamnaya of 3500 BCE who invaded Europe on horseback around 2500 BCE. Yamnaya domesticated horses. Yamnaya mixed with Europeans and some of their descendants went back and became the Sintashta.
@@JRANDALL93this. Corded ware has a different patrilineal descent that Yamnaya, that same patrilineal descent is shared in the Sintashta. I don’t disagree about the horse domestication aspect, but because of how universally similar Proto-Eurasian dna was you have to analyze specific markers to find the differences. The Y-Chromosomal descent is a very telling factor because it’s passed directly from fathers to sons, regardless of where their mothers may have been from. A man can have many sons from different women and they’ll all share the same Y chromosome. This is how tribes started and grew.
It was a cwc and bac culture not yamnaya. Go to primary school if they allow you to join🤣 CWC and BAC is R1a as the video states. Yamnaya is R1b which originated in north africa. That's why spanish italians irish and welsh are dark
True Turks are mix of Mongolian, Chinese, Siberian, and Western Eurasian European looking people. They also mixed with Iranic and Middle Eastern peoples. Whatever land they settled they mixed. Those in Modern Turkey who are descended from true Turk invaders mixed heavey with the local greek,Iranic peoples and other middle eastern groups. The Turk rulers also often took European wives from the Balkins and Ossetian wives from the Caucasus. Today many in Turkey actually have very little genes from these original Turk invaders.
Today Turks in Turkey have always been the most powerful Turks in the entire history of Turks. They were always sovereign people. They were the ones who represent the real original Turks for that reason.
if we tracing far back enough to Ancient North Eurasians from whom originally originated paternal ancestors of Indo-Europeans origins than it would be Out of Buryatia/Siberia th-cam.com/video/WjveAN70giU/w-d-xo.htmlsi=fc2XQUtcN8TBseDs
@@rostamyazata991 yes we do, you don't sound mature or conservative when you say something like that, it makes you look oblivious and not well versed in a subject, it's a very conservative thing to say, if you followed and dwelled into anthropology you'd know this by now, there's to many craniometric analysis that shows identicality with scandanvian skulls as well as pigmentation prediction that shows that they were relatively very blond and light eyed, also another thing to throw in, why do you think there are occasional north european looking people among modern isolated dardic tribes? It's not a coincidence, it's just factual at this point that sintashta and scandanvians had the same elements phenotypically
There's not even one İndo-İranian ethnic group in closest modern population list. And this result shows how close Germanic-Russian-Finnish people are/were.Finnish-İngrian-Moksha-Erzya are the Finno-Uralic people and the rest is Germanic and Russian.
thats because indo Iranian groups got assimilated while having sintashta dna. into native populations of the area they settled in. Pashtuns and tajiks range from 26-32 % sintasha, Iranians between 12 and 16 %, indics in the north like jats at 25-30 % aswell, pamiris even at 45 % sintashta, etc.
Are you kidding us bro?! How can the people of Nordic bronze age speak Uralic, if they are related with Indo-Europeans, Is there a document, article, resource or something about this? Moreover Are you seriously convinced because of the affinity list that Sintashta can't be Indo-Iranian? Do you think it's weird that the Proto-Indo-Iranians who didn't mix with the Middle Easterners, the Indus valley and BMAC were close to their other Indo-European brothers?!
Haha gypsies are actually interesting since they took the opposite route of their ancestors. Corded Ware in Europe => Sintashta in Central Steppe of Eurasia => Indo-Aryan ancestors of Gypsies moved in South Asia => than Gypsies proceed return to Europe from South Asia 😂
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat But you miss the point that Pidoras and thiefs both terms used by Human beings counter other Human beings 😂 Did you ever saw pidoras and thief Martians or Jupiterians? Only Humans could be like that
The first functional war chariots were built by the Sumerians, who were taught how to build them by their leadership, just like how they were taught ALL of civilization, as opposed to figuring anything out on their own. They had 4 wheels. Later cultures modified them into two-wheeled vehicles.
Those are typically called war wagons and they were slow. So slow soldiers abandoned them when they retreated on foot. The spoked wheel is a massive leap forward, look at old Sumerian depictions of their wagons, it’s a solid wheel. Some of them even have two wheels. But they’re solid wheels. The spoked wheel was so revolutionary it became a religious symbol, known as the “Wheel of Time” or the “Wheel of Light” or “The Wheel of Life.” We have no evidence of spoked wheels before the Sintashta chariot burials in about 2100 bc.
@@Wowzersdude-k5ctypically oxen pulled the war wagons and donkeys were used for two wheel agriculture wagons. Same type of wheel: two solid half circles kept together by two rectangles one on the top connecting the two halves and the other on the bottom connecting the two halves.
I am Persian and my Andronovo ancestry ranges at 25.6, Neolithic Iranian ancestry is 32.8, Anatolian ancestry is 24.4, and CHG is 17.2%.My Haplogroup is R1a. My the Iranics that entered into history where heavily Chacolithic( Caucasian & Anatolian) balanced by Andronovan steppe derived. This genetic makeup constitutes the Iron Age Iranians which were largely unaffected by outside groups for over 3000 years.
@@Eyyubid_Kurdish amen, and indo iranians are apart of the ethnogenesis of the Huns and Turks mixing with the proto mongols and scytho siberians. The sogdians as well have a special relationship with the Turks shout out to the Tajiks
@@EzraBenKhazar😂 LoL amen?? Aryan worshiped Mithra Indra Zeus like gods not new borned Jesus Christ. Persian Vedic Hinduism Armenia Syria mittani is their people all of them
@@azizyigido You know that bronze age people weren't completely isolated and there was minimal mixing even back then right? Ancient Turks were overwhelmingly East Eurasian in origin, but still had some West Eurasian ancestry but they're still Turks hun. Finally, the Sintashta as other Steppe people had large North Eurasian origins which also can explain the "South Asian" in the calculator.
Es curioso, tengo por ejemplo un 26,44% de adn sintashta y un 13,16% del Cáucaso, 1,46% Balochi y mi haplogrupo paterno es el G....... por cierto un 85% Ibero o sea de España. El resto del primer ejemplo en un K12 era un 42% granjero europeo, Asia occidental un 13%. No entiendo entonces tal proporción de sintashta y caucásico. ¿Qué opinión tienes sobre el motivo ya que hablas de una composición R1a, R1b y Q1 ?
SRYDNEY stog 8000 years ago they took women from caususes hunter gatherers but gave none of his own women They they got dividend as Celts Germans and Indo Iranians that's why they match After caucuses hunter gatherers they went to Ukraine got women gave none, than Germany got women but gave none, than Sweden got women but gave none England gave none of their women In spain got women gave none The indo iranian batch spread the similar way camouflaging as Indians, people of no nation but still conquerors.
@@sigmahacker1 it's autosomal that is higher among North Western Indians, haplo isn't fancy I said. Jatts carry more L than R1a, R2 but autosomal genetics related steppe is very higher amon them. search r1a and see distribution in India.
@@sigmahacker1 Brahmins are different from Jatts, Jatts are outsider Scythian descendents they are considered lower caste. Gangetic Brahmins are highest autosomal ancestor of Sintashta Aryans among all Brahmin groups.
Don't modern populations' DNA matches say more about where the culture's DNA went & survived? Seems like the DNA of this individual mostly survived West & north and also ending up in India. This certainly supports t he conclusion this individual spoke some PIE descendant language.
Decimali !! Benim Türkçe hariç hiç bir dil bilmiyorum sizleri anlayabilmem için çeviri dilini kullanabilirmisiniz çünkü burda kim ne yorum yapıyor bilemiyorum. Birde ben Türkiye Cumhuriyeti topraklarında yaşayan Yörük Türkmen asıllı bir soydanım Orta Asya dan geldiğimize inanıyorum ve öyle biliyorum sekiz yüz yılı geçmiş atalarımız geleli onun için Orta Asya nın tam olarak neresinden geldik bilmiyorum unutulmuş gitmiş, biz Selçuk lu Oğuz ları olarak hangi kültürdeniz çünkü bizlerde moğolluk yok gibi, resimde görülen kişi benim İran' lıda değilim Avrupalı gibide değilim bilemiyorum Orta Asya nın hangi kültürü bizim atalarımız??
Sen türkmen ve yerel anadolulu karışımısın, tipine bakarak değil genel olarak türkler böyle. Yerel anadolulu atalarının çok ilginç bir yanı yok 3000-4000 yıldır burada yaşayan tarımla uğraşan insanlar. Türkmenler ise oğuz türklerindendir, göktürk zamanlarında oğuz türkleri %30-40 veya çok daha fazla mongoloiddi. Oğuzlar diğer türklerin arasında atalarının geleneklerini en son bırakanlardan türklerdendir. Dna testi yaptırırsan %kaç türksün % kaç hunsun öğrenebilirsin
@@postachamdi6286 merhaba arkadaşım!! Sizce Selçuk lu Oğuz ları yani biz Yörük Türkmenleri Orta Asya dan hangi kültürün devamıyız , Saka, massaget, Alan ve As lar gibi. Bence biz Yörük ler dokuz Oğuz ve dokuz Veyvur ların Orhun, selanga nehri civarında devlet kurmuş hakanlığının devamı değiliz içimizde Eymir, iğdir, bölükleri var ammaki daha büyük boylar yok ,Tongralar, Telengitler, Bayurkular, Sekizler, Edizler gibi bu büyük boyların hiç biri Seyhun nehri Oğuz Türkleri arasında yok, bende düşünüyorum ve diyorumki biz Yörük Türkmenleri nin atalarını Seyhun nehri boyları Karatav bölgesi mugocar tepeleri ve Turgay vadisinde taa 552 yıllarında adı geçen Çin kaynaklarında Tiele boylarının devamıyız diyorum daha eski yıllarda Massaget boylarının arta kalanları biz Yörük ler olmalıyız diyorum, siz ne dersiniz?
@@bahattincevik3168 dostum ben tarihçi değilim dna ile ilgili soruların varsa bildiğim kadarıyla cevaplayayım. Eren karakoç ve Ersen defence hocanın youtube kanalı var oralara sorabilirsin sorularını. Onlar bilir.
I would say by your face you had some Greek ancestry, also white slavic DNA and some Asiatic Kyrgyz from China but you arw Mediterranean looking generally like a Bulgarian or Hungarian hope that helps my Great grandmother was born in Turkey but she is of Greek descent.
Both replies are illogical and out of place and out-dated. If they are consumed in Chinese-Turkic peoples, how is R1az93 is dominant among the Turks? And throwing insults is the least human thing to do and openly racist.
@@ismailhakkisulucay4596 Which turk? Anatolian or Central Asian? Central Asia was vastly Indo-Iranic before the North Chinese Xiognu expension of Turk and other East Asiatic nomads.
@@Yasa5na All Anatolian Turks are decendents of Central Asian Turks. Check your info. Of course all nations have mixed through the ages but we identify as Turks thanks to our language and culture. Important part is not the history, it is to figure out how to build a better future. Look what is happening in Iran and India today in terms of human suffering. Racism is a dead end which was proved once again by Hitler and the people around him who believed in non-sensical Arian stories.
He is the most close to modern Irish and Scots and he is R1a? It seems that much of them are the most similar to the Irish and Scots ... LOL And how is that data on the end "the closest modern population" are not in accordance with that "Irish- Celtic" in the beginning? And what are implication of genetic relation of this Sintashta individual with modern-day Irish and scotish populations?
MyHeritage doesn't have reference populations like Sintashta. Even the closest populations aren't that close i.e. North Swedish @ 13.989. Also people need to get over the "Celtic" thing. Irish, Scots and Welsh are Insular Celts but not similar to Continental Celts. What would be interesting to see is an ancient Celtic genome uploaded and see what populations MyHeritage would give. Anyway it's obvious that even the Genetic Groups on MyHeritage are not using IBD like Ancestry does for their Genetic Communities.
Y DNA haplogroup Q, R1az93 and their most close group kurdish for their language. R1AZ93 is basic indo iranian but infact this subclade is a turkic derived genome. Askhenazi jew, conqourer magyars cemeteries full of this halogrup. Recent day krygyz and anarolian turks have this Y DNA and its subclade
Language is Turkic. In Kypchak branch they have common words like: Dank which means Glory in kipchak branch in German it is Danke. Baby is Böbök/bebek. A bit in English Bita in Uzbek and Bitana in Turkish. Even German mean in Turkic Her Man which means all man and the country has name Alemania which means all men. Coz Vizi Goths are Bash Kurt/ Kort
@@Ersen_abiniz let me know when I will provide u with altaic grammar. Bolmogun = Woll mögen in German and even they use our grammar for past perfect tense -d -t like Boldu be/ oldu mu/ Would be. Even word Get/Git in English Get. How can I get to Istanbul? Do u see bro. In German they add -Ge in past tense GeBraucht, in turkic we add it to the end GelGEn , TuuGAn (doGAn)
Iranians have west asian (caucasian) dna and indians have south asian (dravidian) dna and both of them have native ancestry but their language are indo europian
Ok man germans also have whg. greek and italian(mediterneian)hav anatolian neotlic farmer The purest people are the Celts and some of the Balto-Slavs, and some of the Indo-Iranians, such as the Tajiks, Yaqnoubi and Nuristani. But the main criterion is the language. In this way, Turks are not even 1% Turks.
Ok now watch that Yamnaya dude 😂 Yes Aryans are dark like us not Nordic, Because our ancestors called themselves Aryans so we are free to call ourselves Aryans. Come on mlecchas don't be too dreamy.
@gatishayajan dargins are basically 41% yamnaya 56% kura araxes with a couple percent barcin _n and 1% east Asian and they are as light as Balkanites. It's a myth that all yamnayans were dark and their closest relatives are Finnish ppl for crying out loud😂😂😂 a couple bs reconstructions of yamnaya that were made with clear bias has unfortunately created this myth that is common amongst a good amount of ppl
@@sahilsingh6048 yes, aryans were tan skinned and with colorful eyes or dark eyes. But the point here they arent indians nor indians arent their descendands. Go take a dna test u will end up seeing you are %80 South asian %20 other such as %5 scandavian %3 chinese etc...
Uralic-altaic is more than indian wow, superior! This collapses "indoeuropean" theory... :D I think all these movies are related to mtdna effect. H, J, K, T, U, V mtdna are european mtdna haplogroups, on the other hand P1, Q1a, Q1b, R1a, R2b ydna are altaian siberia originated ydna haplogroups. As we can understand, I think yamnaya, sintashta, andronovo, afanasievo etc are mixed cultures.
Not from Chinkoids but from Cro-Magnon like West Eurasian individuals, you've no idea about Ancient North Eurasians, They were not the same as modern Siberian Chinkoids, sorry. After the ice age they migrated down to Caucasus, Central Asia ( all extinct), South Asia and Eastern Europe. Outside these places there are some Native American and Siberian groups got ANE ancestry but highly mixed with Chinkoids.
We have no connection with Scandinavians but they have connection with ANE people that's why this common ancestry shows up. That's Aryans who conquered much of Europe and massacred lot of people.
@@Yasa5na All those P1, Q1a, Q1b, R1a, R1b, R2 ydna are originated from southeast asians genetically and these descendants were speaking agglutinative uralic-altaic, native american, dene-yeniseian, sumerian, north caucasian, tyrrhenian-vasconic, dravidian languages not indoeuropean... Indoeuropeans are F, G1, G2, H, I1, I2, J2, K1 ydna haplogroups who are located in europe, middle east, india namely in indoeurope. North euroasians are modern uyghur turkic, altaic originated people who have ancestral P1, R* ydna even today. Myheritage looks mostly mtdna, so we dont see turkic origins because R, H, V, J, T, U, K mtdna are mostly european maternal linage. If we can see any C3, N2, N3, P1, Q1a, Q1b, R1a, R1b, R2 ydna + A, X, I, W, Y, C, Z, D, G mtdna in altaian siberia, I am sure that we can see enough turkic percentages like we see in Tagar Culture.
Yes Iranians are also Europeans initially it’s the same population with one language and similar traditions, they are called the pellazgo-illirians, nowadays Albanians, who have conserved the original language of humanity. Max Planck Institute in Germany had attested that the roots of the language goes back to at least 9000 years. Of course I believe is more but it’s enough to cut the head of some speculations, manipulations and politisation of history that some moderns have made.
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisboratWhat? where did you get that? IE people were patriarchal not other way around, same thing happened in Euro populations fuked native women killing their partners.
The man is carrier of the R1a group, which today is most common among Slavs, and according to you, he is related to the Scots, Welsh and Irish who have the R1b group, without any sense!!
All the groups you mentioned genetically derive from the Corded Ware culture (which carried both haplogroups, with R1a being more prominent) and Y-DNA haplogroups do not correspond with autosomal DNA
It said it in the video, it’s looking at modern populations that are close to the sample. It’s not going to be 100% accurate because the test is for modern people, but it is looking for similarities and those are the populations it sees as being the closest
Strange, your map puts the sintashta north of the Aral sea yet you insinuate that they were ancestral to the indo iranians. Did you consider the ydna data that places the origin of haplogroups p, q and r in south asia?
The chariot apparently originated in Mesopotamia in about 3000 bc; monuments from Ur and Tutub depict battle parades that include heavy vehicles with solid wheels, their bodywork framed with wood and covered with skins.
You should also note that Indo aryan related groups in east afg and northwest Pak have a high amount of light features due to selection and inbreeding (despite that the majority isn't even all light featured)
If you are an aryan with R1a, the most aryan are the Central Asian Turks, not the Iranians or the Indians 🙂. Even the Huns or Göktürks have autosomal DNA and y dna affinity with Europeans incomparably with Indians and Iranians. Existing theories involve strictly unscientific and political stuff. More accurate and impartial studies should be carried out.
Not based on autosomal dna. Keep in mind that modern Turks absorbed the Caucasoid Indo-European people they conquered and Turkified them. Paternal haplogroup is one component. Autosomal is another
Everyone has their crazy take when it comes to genetics. Ancient Turks are ultimately an East Asian people regardless of the people who speak Turkic languages today.
Stop talking about those fu4%g Turks... whose women were once fu25ed by the Scythians just like in India.. These peoples are bastards who today autosomally are what they were before the Scythian invasion... Somewhere you'll find R1a.. "We are Aryans"... LOL... Healing complexes by being a mythomaniac
@@WorldTimes-tm7zt Archeology and every paper I’ve ever read from people from around the world. The horse was domesticated, and the oldest chariots have been found in Europe. What did Christopher Columbus lie about? I believe you are misinterpreting what he set out to do, and why. We’d all be in burkas and hijabs if he hadn’t.
![เปิด อาณาจักร หมื่นล้าน "สาระตั้ม" l [Nickynachat]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3XE0nPF4YkQ/mqdefault.jpg)
I requested Sintashta in a previous video. I want to thank you for doing this. If possible, in a future video to do Sogdian samples?
That would be awesome!!!
I agree
Sogdians are Silk road people
Underrated channel
Love this channel hope it grows
An amazing channel! Very interesting.
TH-cam:ROBERT SEPHER VIDEOS 👍
one of the best channels on TH-cam
Please Please test ancient Elam and also Oxus Bactria-Margiana Civilization .
Funny how Finns are both one of the most asian and one of the most indoeuropean populations in europe
Bullshit. What does 'Asian' mean. Asia is a really big continent with a vast history. There are the Tuvans, And the Tamils in the South! Fins are neither indo european nor 'East Asian'. They emerged in the Urals thousand of years ago and migrated to Finland.
They’re neither of them btw
onlar ural halkarı
How in the world am I only finding out now about this great channel? thank you for sharing, amazing content.
No mention of the fact that Kyrgyzs have highest frequency of R1a Z93
Please do Tocharian DNA
But there isn’t much Toxharian Dna
The mummies in Xinjiang were not Tocharian but an isolated West Siberian population(Mix of ANEs and Baikal HGs). We have afanesievo, scythian but not a single so called tocharian sample from Xinjiang
@@blyat5352scityans yueshy uyghur uzbeki. Azer tajik yes and celts Red hair mix
@@blyat5352and khazar scityans royal
Makes sense that they're related to the corded ware
I'd like to see more of the origins of Indo-Iranians. From Tarim basin to different tribes of Scythian confederation, Alans and their trace on Europe and north Africa.
I have noticed most of your videos somehow show ancient eurasian populations almost always exclusively related to Baltic, Celtic (Scottish-Irish), South Asian and Scandinavian modern populations. Almost no hint of e.g. germanic, italic, slavic or iranic populations, etc.
Have is that possible and how could it be explained?
Those populations got a lot of Ancient North Eurasian genes that's why
I have same question.especially that Balto Slavic are closely related
no Tatars, no Tajiks at all. some obvious BS.
@@Qvadratus. Because the groups you are referring are mongol mixed, also lowest ANE, Indo-Aryans have the highest ANE among West Asians, Central Asians and South Asians.
@@Yasa5na they aren't mongol mixed at all.
I am Kyrgyz from Kyrgyzstan and the highest frequency of R1a z93 is in Kyrgyzstan especially among Kyrgyz in Mongolia kHoton is 83%. My paternal dna is R1a z93 and maternal M8. 49% East Asian Mongolian and Manchurian and 2% Native American; 39% east European and 8% Middleast and 2% India
Khoton in Mongolia are actually not Kyrgyz origin
@@barguttobed they conducted dna test and they are male kyrgyz who married uighur women from Tribe Sary Bagysh and they even call themselves Sarybash
@@barguttobedMongols:Turkic,Tungusic and chines mixed😂
@@umhvdfjkczxcgjdryjndfjobff Don’t appropriate R1a to Kyrgyz only, since Khotons people have more R1a frequency than modern Kyrgyz and it’s most likely due to bottleneck effect. Khotons are actually part of Mongolians by their culture and identity, they carry nowadays mostly Mongolian blood since they were intermixing constantly with Dorbets(Oirat tribe) from whom they took their language(Khotons spoke old Oirat dialect better than other Oirats in Mongolia influenced by Halh). Ethnically they have also non Mongolian origins but not from Kyrgyzs rather Sarts Muslim population of east Turkestan(actually known as Uyghurs), their founder ancestors athhropologically even had Pamir-Fergana subtype of race which is frequent among Uyghurs, Uzbeks, Tajiks but not Kyrgyzs who are highly east eurasian.
@@azizyigido Jealous small Anatolian gypsy 😊
Keep in mind these results does not mean that the result people have the heritage of resultant area but it means the resultant area people's have their heritage.
Sorry for bad english.
Sintashta is ancestral to the Andronovo Culture, which is proto Indo Iranian. 2:58 - their morphology, features and facial proportions look a lot like modern Pathans, Nuristanis, Afridis from the Khyber Pass area.
Delusional, the Persians/Iranians are from the BMAC group
When I write 'roto Indo Iranian' I mean 1) linguistically and also partly 2) genetically. Of course the trajectory of the R1a carrying males of Sinthashta/Andronovo culture eventually took them to the place where the Proto BMAC people had settled, essentially Iranian plateau neolith males of YDNA J2, but also T1a-M170, as well as L-M20. And yes both elects mixed and then spread out outwards in both directions as both Indo aryans and then later as Iranians. but recent archeological remains from BMAC put through DNA testing, reveal a mixture of BOTH Neolithic Iranian related males (J2, T1a, G2b) AND Andronovo indo European steppe related males (R1a) contributing to later BMAC culture and its alter dispersals. Where exactly am i being 'delusional'?
@@dorkinsful
And Himachali also. They look more like Himachali people I would say.
I speak a language called pakhto or pashto (two main dialects). Sintashta if I divide this to two words sin and tashta, with a slight tuning Shin Tashta (or Takhta) it mean green plains. Pashto is spoken by pashtoon people though to be of aryan decent, interesting
We don't know what the Sintashta people called themselves.
Это название культуры, просто название реки, в этом регионе.
NO. not aryan. you arent aryan. lol
@@Aryaveer_jadli look who's saying that
@@jostnamane3951 me? I am a Brahmin from jammu(northern India), my ancestors were all Vedic Brahmins , and my name literally means , the brave Arya. sooo??????
36 percent of my DNA from this culture
39 percent from Bmac
9.8 east Asian
16.4 Indus valley civilization.
I'm a pashtun
A serious question. Have we discovered any inscriptions or writing symbols from the Sintashta site? If not, how do we know they were Indo-Iranian speakers?
It was a preliterate culture. Very long pre.
Later inscription of Vedic age of India and archeology and Genetic lineage similarities show that connection.
@@Yasa5na that is not quite solid
@@LogicaetRatio-r8z go check some papers, copping will not make us non-aryan like you people.
@@Yasa5nahahah wannabe aryan but actually pure indian😂😂 I am more aryan than you
Individual sample ID: I1086 you used as an example, could be a relative of mine based on his appearance. Being as I am, lumped into Haplogroup R1aR1b it is understandable that I have the tall face deep set eyes (hardly any eye brows), largish nose, and strong chin as this man (even have those same two creases at the top of his nose). My eyes are blue however.
However, I can trace my paternal lineage back as far as the Normans although my line may have been Franks who joined the invasion of England.
Sintashta culture was deeply connected with Yamna culture directly and indirectly, so this is where the genetic affinity between these sites comes from. 🙂👌
how can they be directly when their culture began after Yamnaya finished? they only have indirect descent
@@Survivethejive Perhaps he's referring to ethnically, therefore a direct connection. Dunno
No they didn't
@@stormtrooper8420 Why not...
@@dejantodorovski5222 because they originated from the corded ware people.
They are yamnaya related but not the same
Very interesting and well resumed. Sub !
OMFG the Ukrainian government ideologues are gonna hate this. Well done.
Why? Can you elaborate?
@@jmab721 Because the Iranian migrated from Ukraine, and the government are racists, but Iran has a far better ancient history than Ukraine, they should be proud.
Not sure where Sintashta percentage of 58.6 came from ? You said Sintashta is R1a. The overwhelming majority of Celtic (Irish, Scottish and Welsh) is R1b.
The haplogrouo is just a very small part of the DNA that doesn't get mixed with time. It doesn't correlate necessarily with the autosomal DNA, which is used to measure total ancestry
Almost all male Brazilians are R1b, for example, even though we are on average 20% African and 10% Amerindian
I would assume the R1b haplogroup in Brazil is directly related to the Westeren Europeans from Portugal that colonized Brazil..? Spain and Portugal is overwhelming R1b. R1a is found more in Eastern Europe and into areas of Germany.
@@LucasVieira-cz6kq
@@LucasVieira-cz6kq still doesn't make sense, seeing as males dictate evolution of facial features and bloodline more than females. Because they kill off their competitors.
You would think that since r1a is the predominant male bloodline, the highest percentage of common ancestry would be more in line with Eastern Europeans, rather than far western r1b in Ireland. If the 58.6% was Baltic that would have made more sense seeing as it's right next to the people with the purest r1a lineage: the polish
@@dab0331 "males dictate the evolution of facial features more than female"
That's not how it works. Every child inherit half their DNA from their mother and half from their father.
I will have the same haplogroup as the father of my father. But I'll have only 25% of his autosomal DNA
Also, facial features don't correlate precisely with ancestry admixture.
@@LucasVieira-cz6kq yes. But NOT EVERY MAN procreates. Men die more often than women because of sickness and war. And in war the CONQUERING MEN spread their genes while the Conquered men don't. Yet both the women of the conquering tribe AND THE CONQUERED tribe reproduce.
Which means the MAN'S genetics is LESS DIVERSE than the women's, and the women's genetics are still heavily influenced by their father's X chromosome.
It's simple math
The different races exist because they have a common PATERNAL grandfather, NOT because they have a common maternal grandmother. The genes passed on by mothers is far too varied, while the men's are not.
It's not an accident than most black people have Haplogroup E as an ancestor and Europeans have ancestor R.
just look at the world dna map,and u will see who is/was related to who,what closely related "language" they spoke,and which regions they lived...
Closest modern population is North Swedish. I’m swedish from the north and I have no doubt that he is not closely related to any swedish people. But there is a connection and it is the corded ware people.
3000 BC, a community lived in the vicinity of Moscow (Yaroslav). This community, known today as the Fatyanavo culture, consisted entirely of individuals with R1a-Z93 y-DNA. The oldest known R1 a y-DNA sample (PES001, Veretye, 10,500 BC) is also from this region. This community migrated to Asia from 2000 BC. The ones who went to Turkestan (Srubna, Sintasha, Andronovo) became Turkicized. With the exception of the Sahas and the Dolgans, a significant part of all Turkic peoples are of this lineage. In the Kyrgyz, Bashkirs and Karachay-Balkars, this rate is over 50%. This includes Hungarians. Some have even become peoples speaking other Uralic languages.
Some of them settled in today's Tajikistan, Afghanistan and Pakistan. This is the story of the Indo-Iranians, the speakers of European languages in Asia. 50% of Tajikistan and Afghanistan; 25% of Pakistan, India, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh; and 10-15% of Iran are descendants of these R1a-Z93s who came to Asia from North-Eastern Europe after 2000 BC. Any other story is a fairy tale (Caucasian Indo-Europeans, Anatolian Indo-Europeans, Central Asian Indo-Europeans, Siberian Indo-Europeans ....). Of all the Indo-Iranian peoples, it is the Iranian
minorities of the Pamirs (Yagnob,
Shugnan ...) who still most resemble
their ancestors in Fatyanavo.
From Tajikistan, Afghanistan and
Pakistan, where they first arrived,
the Indo-Iranians gradually spread
into Iran and the interior of India,
mixing and changing with the
indigenous peoples of the region. The fact that Iranians and Turanians (Turks) are enemy brothers from the same ancestor (Feridun Shah), which is written in the 2 most important historical works of Iranians (Avesta and Shahnameh), which are compilations of the oral history of Iranians, may be related to this issue.The Fatyanavo culture's own siblings are the R1a-Z283 y-DNA people. They lived west of the Fatyanavo culture in the Corded Ware culture in the Baltics. They spread from the north towards Western Europe. 50% of Russians, 45% of Poles, 39% of Slovaks, 29% of Ukrainians, 22% of Norwegians, 21% of Slovenes, 17% of Icelanders, 14% of Swedes; They are descendants of R1a-Z283 y-DNAs, which are the self-siblings of the R1a-Z93 y-DNAs that went to Asia, which we see in the Corded Ware culture.
People sure got around a lot.
Those town/cities are near identical to the Mitanni city
According to illustrative dna I am 20 percent related to this culture.
Are you turkic? or Indo-Iranian speaker?
@@Yasa5na I am half Kurdish.
@@kirlisakaall speak turkish? if you're R1a we share a common ancestor, if J1/J2 you share ancestor with West Asians and Arabs
@@Yasa5na Haplogrup Lm27 benim.
@@kirlisakaallmany people belong to that group too in South Asia especially upper south western coastlines.
They descended from Corded ware culture so were related to us Germanics, Celts and Slavs
Corded mostly R1a, while Celts R1b, Germans R1b, I1
In my heritage typical Slavic classification is "Eastern European", Baltic is Baltic as it is represented by current day Baltic populations who maintain some remnants of old religions and oldest living Indo-European languages
@@danbaltic9678They Tend to overlap because Slavs are Balts + Carpathian_BA
And? Please don't say that you're planing to claim Indo-Iranians based on Corded Ware connection.
Oh fool they are not related to you they are ancestors of modern day Indo Iranians of Iran and north India and yes they were white people nobody deny that .They got mixed with native population which turns out to be a bad decision
Swastika City BABYYYYYY!
Swastikas and Wheels of Time.
Oh and the settlement is built like Atlantis.
Legends!
R1a is wide spread among Slavic people. The map given in video is misleading.
I think it's more frequent in India than to West Asia or Eastern Europe.
Not The subclade Z93.
@@Yasa5nar1a can be more in india because of crowded population. Not because of origin
@@postachamdi6286 lol describe R2/L/Q/T/K 🤓
@@Yasa5na R2 is special for indians. R2 is mostly founds in india. Q is brother of R long time ago. Yet it doesnt means R is india. Q mostly founds in siberia and american locals.
K is grandfather of R and Q.
3:03 the guy on the right looks a bit like Aragorn/King Elessar Telcontar 😃
Indoeuropeans. 😎
Aryans
On the steppe
When you ride your horse
You fear not death
(Sung to the rhythm of Aerials by System of a Down)
if you are satisfied with this answer😊
Actually it's indo-aryans. It was changed because of the stigma dipstick Hitler put on the word Aryan. These are all part of indo-aryan(European) language groups.
@@billstream1974 I’m going to assume you’re talking to me, and I’m going to tell you a secret; what the useless academics decide to “change” what they choose to call our ancestors doesn’t change the historical reality of what these people self identified as.
Oh how beautiful Indo-Aryans also come from the steppes, soon they will belong to the ancient Turkish people from Central Asia.
Very nice👌
Tajiks in the Pamir mountains have the highest frequency of R1a.
@@naturelover630 pamirians are scythians, like ossetians and pashtuns
In fact R1a - Z93 which is Scythian
Pamiris are not tajiks.
Study says something else👇🏼
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/c/c4/20160918032616%21R1a_origins_%28Underhill_2010%29_and_R1a1a_oldest_expansion_and_highest_frequency_%282014%29.jpg
Bro where are you? We need more videos 😢
This guy looks like ancient slavic priest 😊
name a sfamous slave who look like him
@@Yasa5na Name an Indian who look like him😂
@@barguttobedMost indians from central,east and South India are dravadians.Indians from northwest India are mixed Aryans and dravadians so not pure so yes definitely Indo Iranians were white people
@@IbrahimStanikzaiPastuns are white and we are dark? 😅 most people in North Central East are Indo-Aryan, while Pastuns are forgotten Israelites nothing Arya among them.
@@Yasa5na Pashtuns being Israelis is just a myth
They have about 50-70% haplogroup R1a
In general, the ratio of their sintashta reaches 25-40%
I love your channel so much
These are the ancient Slavs! There was no division of the Aryans within the steppe zone of Eurasia, it was one people!
Ancient Persians.
Slavs are a mix of many cultures and people like Sarmatians, Varangians, Thracians etc.
@@TobiasC-mg4zk
The population of the Sintashta culture migrated to Siberia from Eastern Europe. The Sintashta culture is part of the Andronovo cultural community of the Bronze Age. Modern Slavic genetic markers (R1a-Z283/280) were already present in these populations.
@@TobiasC-mg4zk ancient "persians"? ancient indo iranians more like
@@TobiasC-mg4zkslavs have the purest amount of r1a heritage though. Poland is the purest.
So it makes sense as to why the KALASH people of PAKISTAN are WHITE and look POLISH
They are all from the Scythian People.
Sintashtas are Indo Aryans
Please make video about Volga Tatars
Assimilate and Conquer Chinese guys
Based steppe culture whatever their ethnicity and today’s descendants 🏇
A truer comment has never been written 👍
Steppe people are unclean, backward savages. Thank God Indo-Europeans in Europe got civilized, created amazing civilizations and made humanity better.
btw indo-Europeans taught you mongoloids how to ride horses.
@@RichardEdwards40 Butthurt and false claim
@@AryaOghuz ofc they been doing cool metallurgy, constructed ancient cities and rode chariots while in Bronze Age. Based steppe as always.
Гаплогруппы R1a нет там, где её пока не искали.
The part you’re missing about the Sintashta of 2000 BCE is that their ancestors were the Yamnaya of 3500 BCE who invaded Europe on horseback around 2500 BCE. Yamnaya domesticated horses. Yamnaya mixed with Europeans and some of their descendants went back and became the Sintashta.
More like corded ware
@@JRANDALL93this. Corded ware has a different patrilineal descent that Yamnaya, that same patrilineal descent is shared in the Sintashta.
I don’t disagree about the horse domestication aspect, but because of how universally similar Proto-Eurasian dna was you have to analyze specific markers to find the differences. The Y-Chromosomal descent is a very telling factor because it’s passed directly from fathers to sons, regardless of where their mothers may have been from. A man can have many sons from different women and they’ll all share the same Y chromosome. This is how tribes started and grew.
Yamnaya were Europeans who were related to other European HG populations, men who mixed with Caucasian-area women
@@musicandothers7297 and vice versa, most likely. People DO like to fuck, you know?
It was a cwc and bac culture not yamnaya. Go to primary school if they allow you to join🤣 CWC and BAC is R1a as the video states. Yamnaya is R1b which originated in north africa. That's why spanish italians irish and welsh are dark
True Turks are mix of Mongolian, Chinese, Siberian, and Western Eurasian European looking people. They also mixed with Iranic and Middle Eastern peoples. Whatever land they settled they mixed. Those in Modern Turkey who are descended from true Turk invaders mixed heavey with the local greek,Iranic peoples and other middle eastern groups. The Turk rulers also often took European wives from the Balkins and Ossetian wives from the Caucasus. Today many in Turkey actually have very little genes from these original Turk invaders.
Today Turks in Turkey have always been the most powerful Turks in the entire history of Turks. They were always sovereign people. They were the ones who represent the real original Turks for that reason.
@@AlprtngakrcMuslim greeks represent proto Turks the most?
Cry more
@@xanshen9011 cry more :)
You are not known History. We are not similar iranian or arabs or armenians. :)
Thank you!
Hail aryavarta🙌🙌
These answers keep changing, Wait another decade and see who's right or not
Out Of Europe theory intensifies.
Its pretty much settled at this point when it comes to Indo-european languages.
if we tracing far back enough to Ancient North Eurasians from whom originally originated paternal ancestors of Indo-Europeans origins than it would be Out of Buryatia/Siberia th-cam.com/video/WjveAN70giU/w-d-xo.htmlsi=fc2XQUtcN8TBseDs
More like out of Iran. Read the Southern arc paper.
Cringe
@@atacama1000 That terrible paper that contradicts well established genetic, archeological, and linguistic evidence?
Couldn't some people from the Shintashta culture have crossed the Bering Straight too while they possessed technological advantage?
They only looked northern european
We don’t know for sure, and it would be anachronistic to state such thing
@@rostamyazata991 yes we do, you don't sound mature or conservative when you say something like that, it makes you look oblivious and not well versed in a subject, it's a very conservative thing to say, if you followed and dwelled into anthropology you'd know this by now, there's to many craniometric analysis that shows identicality with scandanvian skulls as well as pigmentation prediction that shows that they were relatively very blond and light eyed, also another thing to throw in, why do you think there are occasional north european looking people among modern isolated dardic tribes? It's not a coincidence, it's just factual at this point that sintashta and scandanvians had the same elements phenotypically
There are some Kurds who look Scandinavian
Нет.
The big nose guy was kind of like Himachali😂.
thank you!-very nice video
There's not even one İndo-İranian ethnic group in closest modern population list.
And this result shows how close Germanic-Russian-Finnish people are/were.Finnish-İngrian-Moksha-Erzya are the Finno-Uralic people and the rest is Germanic and Russian.
thats because indo Iranian groups got assimilated while having sintashta dna. into native populations of the area they settled in. Pashtuns and tajiks range from 26-32 % sintasha, Iranians between 12 and 16 %, indics in the north like jats at 25-30 % aswell, pamiris even at 45 % sintashta, etc.
Are you kidding us bro?! How can the people of Nordic bronze age speak Uralic, if they are related with Indo-Europeans, Is there a document, article, resource or something about this? Moreover Are you seriously convinced because of the affinity list that Sintashta can't be Indo-Iranian? Do you think it's weird that the Proto-Indo-Iranians who didn't mix with the Middle Easterners, the Indus valley and BMAC were close to their other Indo-European brothers?!
@@vitocorleone9456what are you talking about these people had spoken satem language, proto-indo-iranic with some relation with proto-balto-slavic
Modern Indo Iranians got Farmer DNA BMAC.
While Ancient one got more Andronovo and sintashta
Why they are not listed among closest modern populations then, What Uralics Finns doing there ?@@thelegendaryboy4939
Very cool :O on mothers side I am uzbek, tadzjik and tjerkess
Modern europeans are basically ancient gypsys.
What?
Haha gypsies are actually interesting since they took the opposite route of their ancestors. Corded Ware in Europe => Sintashta in Central Steppe of Eurasia => Indo-Aryan ancestors of Gypsies moved in South Asia => than Gypsies proceed return to Europe from South Asia 😂
@@barguttobedgypsies aren't Aryans.
they are thiefs and pidoras people.
they are not humans, nobody like them
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat But you miss the point that Pidoras and thiefs both terms used by Human beings counter other Human beings 😂 Did you ever saw pidoras and thief Martians or Jupiterians? Only Humans could be like that
@@barguttobed So you like gypsies
It was much older. Possibly about 6000 BC.
Nope, Sintashta is dated from 2200 to 1900 BC
@@Nastya_07 true but higher amerindian %%
The first functional war chariots were built by the Sumerians, who were taught how to build them by their leadership, just like how they were taught ALL of civilization, as opposed to figuring anything out on their own. They had 4 wheels. Later cultures modified them into two-wheeled vehicles.
Sumerians didn't have horses. They had wagons that were pulled by oxen or donkeys, though they were an inferior design to what Sintashta invented.
Those are typically called war wagons and they were slow. So slow soldiers abandoned them when they retreated on foot.
The spoked wheel is a massive leap forward, look at old Sumerian depictions of their wagons, it’s a solid wheel. Some of them even have two wheels. But they’re solid wheels.
The spoked wheel was so revolutionary it became a religious symbol, known as the “Wheel of Time” or the “Wheel of Light” or “The Wheel of Life.”
We have no evidence of spoked wheels before the Sintashta chariot burials in about 2100 bc.
@@Wowzersdude-k5ctypically oxen pulled the war wagons and donkeys were used for two wheel agriculture wagons.
Same type of wheel: two solid half circles kept together by two rectangles one on the top connecting the two halves and the other on the bottom connecting the two halves.
I am Persian and my Andronovo ancestry ranges at 25.6, Neolithic Iranian ancestry is 32.8, Anatolian ancestry is 24.4, and CHG is 17.2%.My Haplogroup is R1a.
My the Iranics that entered into history where heavily Chacolithic( Caucasian & Anatolian) balanced by Andronovan steppe derived. This genetic makeup constitutes the Iron Age Iranians which were largely unaffected by outside groups for over 3000 years.
Nice! Our ancestors
They are the ancestors of Proto Indo Iranians
@@Eyyubid_Kurdish amen, and indo iranians are apart of the ethnogenesis of the Huns and Turks mixing with the proto mongols and scytho siberians. The sogdians as well have a special relationship with the Turks shout out to the Tajiks
@@EzraBenKhazar so according to you Indo Iranians are Turkic who mixed with Mongols and Siberians
@@EzraBenKhazar😂 LoL amen?? Aryan worshiped Mithra Indra Zeus like gods not new borned Jesus Christ. Persian Vedic Hinduism Armenia Syria mittani is their people all of them
@@Truth.sparrow well my people the Khazars chose Judaism so amen it is 😆
Hello, could you make a similar video about the steppe eniolite of the Caucasus, I mean samples from progress and vonychka PG2001 PG2004 VJ1001😀
With beards the dude on the left looks like a young gandalf and with or without beards the dude on the right looks like Aragorn.
Plz Metei Pangal 😢😢😢
the original aryans
4.2%South asian are real aryan😂
@@azizyigido You know that bronze age people weren't completely isolated and there was minimal mixing even back then right? Ancient Turks were overwhelmingly East Eurasian in origin, but still had some West Eurasian ancestry but they're still Turks hun.
Finally, the Sintashta as other Steppe people had large North Eurasian origins which also can explain the "South Asian" in the calculator.
@@azizyigido only idiots think that
@@DigoronKavkaz nope the closest modern day populations to Sintashta people are north euros stop with the unnecessary kanging
@@User-zy5io I never claimed otherwise. Read my post again.
How about China's Diva Mummy?
Andronova insanınıda bekliyoruz 🖐️
Es curioso, tengo por ejemplo un 26,44% de adn sintashta y un 13,16% del Cáucaso, 1,46% Balochi y mi haplogrupo paterno es el G....... por cierto un 85% Ibero o sea de España. El resto del primer ejemplo en un K12 era un 42% granjero europeo, Asia occidental un 13%. No entiendo entonces tal proporción de sintashta y caucásico. ¿Qué opinión tienes sobre el motivo ya que hablas de una composición R1a, R1b y Q1 ?
horse driven chariot found in India which goes back to 4000 years ago
They are carts not chariots
@@sahilsingh6048 Only a fool can see a cart.... while experts say chariot....
And what does that have anything to do with this video?
wonder why british isles is closest genetic match
SRYDNEY stog 8000 years ago they took women from caususes hunter gatherers but gave none of his own women
They they got dividend as Celts Germans and Indo Iranians that's why they match
After caucuses hunter gatherers they went to Ukraine got women gave none, than Germany got women but gave none, than Sweden got women but gave none
England gave none of their women
In spain got women gave none
The indo iranian batch spread the similar way camouflaging as Indians, people of no nation but still conquerors.
They go everywhere just to Marry their women and swallowed the North hemisphere in 8000 years
That's our ancestors
INDO Iranians sintashtas
Their parents are SRYDNEY stog culture where Celts Germans and indo iranians came from, literally fighting everyday as in Hinduism
@@harammuhmdjeetsstolensaudiIDSYour Ancestors were Native Dravidians AASI And Neolithic Farmers Not Sintashta People 🤡
I am R1a1a z93 Staunchly Hindu Brahmin.
nothing fancy that's found in moderate to higher frequency all over Indo-Aryan speaking groups.
@@Yasa5na only Jats Rors Brahmans have higher Sinthasta ancestry. I score high on Y DNA haplotype r1a1a z93 😂😂
@@sigmahacker1 it's autosomal that is higher among North Western Indians, haplo isn't fancy I said. Jatts carry more L than R1a, R2 but autosomal genetics related steppe is very higher amon them. search r1a and see distribution in India.
@@sigmahacker1 Brahmins are different from Jatts, Jatts are outsider Scythian descendents they are considered lower caste. Gangetic Brahmins are highest autosomal ancestor of Sintashta Aryans among all Brahmin groups.
@@creeper-wm1ix It's Northern Brahmins who fled and became muslim not Gangetics
Don't modern populations' DNA matches say more about where the culture's DNA went & survived? Seems like the DNA of this individual mostly survived West & north and also ending up in India. This certainly supports t he conclusion this individual spoke some PIE descendant language.
Decimali !! Benim Türkçe hariç hiç bir dil bilmiyorum sizleri anlayabilmem için çeviri dilini kullanabilirmisiniz çünkü burda kim ne yorum yapıyor bilemiyorum. Birde ben Türkiye Cumhuriyeti topraklarında yaşayan Yörük Türkmen asıllı bir soydanım Orta Asya dan geldiğimize inanıyorum ve öyle biliyorum sekiz yüz yılı geçmiş atalarımız geleli onun için Orta Asya nın tam olarak neresinden geldik bilmiyorum unutulmuş gitmiş, biz Selçuk lu Oğuz ları olarak hangi kültürdeniz çünkü bizlerde moğolluk yok gibi, resimde görülen kişi benim İran' lıda değilim Avrupalı gibide değilim bilemiyorum Orta Asya nın hangi kültürü bizim atalarımız??
Sen türkmen ve yerel anadolulu karışımısın, tipine bakarak değil genel olarak türkler böyle. Yerel anadolulu atalarının çok ilginç bir yanı yok 3000-4000 yıldır burada yaşayan tarımla uğraşan insanlar.
Türkmenler ise oğuz türklerindendir, göktürk zamanlarında oğuz türkleri %30-40 veya çok daha fazla mongoloiddi. Oğuzlar diğer türklerin arasında atalarının geleneklerini en son bırakanlardan türklerdendir. Dna testi yaptırırsan %kaç türksün % kaç hunsun öğrenebilirsin
Eğer soruların olursa bana yaz bildiğim kadarıyla cevaplar, yardımcı olurum. Yörüklerin genel olarak orta asya yüzdesi az biraz daha fazla olur
@@postachamdi6286 merhaba arkadaşım!! Sizce Selçuk lu Oğuz ları yani biz Yörük Türkmenleri Orta Asya dan hangi kültürün devamıyız , Saka, massaget, Alan ve As lar gibi. Bence biz Yörük ler dokuz Oğuz ve dokuz Veyvur ların Orhun, selanga nehri civarında devlet kurmuş hakanlığının devamı değiliz içimizde Eymir, iğdir, bölükleri var ammaki daha büyük boylar yok ,Tongralar, Telengitler, Bayurkular, Sekizler, Edizler gibi bu büyük boyların hiç biri Seyhun nehri Oğuz Türkleri arasında yok, bende düşünüyorum ve diyorumki biz Yörük Türkmenleri nin atalarını Seyhun nehri boyları Karatav bölgesi mugocar tepeleri ve Turgay vadisinde taa 552 yıllarında adı geçen Çin kaynaklarında Tiele boylarının devamıyız diyorum daha eski yıllarda Massaget boylarının arta kalanları biz Yörük ler olmalıyız diyorum, siz ne dersiniz?
@@bahattincevik3168 dostum ben tarihçi değilim dna ile ilgili soruların varsa bildiğim kadarıyla cevaplayayım. Eren karakoç ve Ersen defence hocanın youtube kanalı var oralara sorabilirsin sorularını. Onlar bilir.
I would say by your face you had some Greek ancestry, also white slavic DNA and some Asiatic Kyrgyz from China but you arw Mediterranean looking generally like a Bulgarian or Hungarian hope that helps my Great grandmother was born in Turkey but she is of Greek descent.
Is that Rasputin I see?
R1az93 is the dominant among the Turkish people who have completely different language and culture. Your title is misleading and misinformed☹️
This can mean only one thing - these Turkish people didn't speak Turkic language at some earlier period of time .
Because this people were Indo-Iranic like Scythians, Sarmatians etc. and consumed inside north Chinese turko gangs.
Both replies are illogical and out of place and out-dated. If they are consumed in Chinese-Turkic peoples, how is R1az93 is dominant among the Turks? And throwing insults is the least human thing to do and openly racist.
@@ismailhakkisulucay4596 Which turk? Anatolian or Central Asian? Central Asia was vastly Indo-Iranic before the North Chinese Xiognu expension of Turk and other East Asiatic nomads.
@@Yasa5na All Anatolian Turks are decendents of Central Asian Turks. Check your info. Of course all nations have mixed through the ages but we identify as Turks thanks to our language and culture. Important part is not the history, it is to figure out how to build a better future. Look what is happening in Iran and India today in terms of human suffering. Racism is a dead end which was proved once again by Hitler and the people around him who believed in non-sensical Arian stories.
He is the most close to modern Irish and Scots and he is R1a? It seems that much of them are the most similar to the Irish and Scots ... LOL And how is that data on the end "the closest modern population" are not in accordance with that "Irish- Celtic" in the beginning? And what are implication of genetic relation of this Sintashta individual with modern-day Irish and scotish populations?
MyHeritage doesn't have reference populations like Sintashta. Even the closest populations aren't that close i.e. North Swedish @ 13.989. Also people need to get over the "Celtic" thing. Irish, Scots and Welsh are Insular Celts but not similar to Continental Celts. What would be interesting to see is an ancient Celtic genome uploaded and see what populations MyHeritage would give. Anyway it's obvious that even the Genetic Groups on MyHeritage are not using IBD like Ancestry does for their Genetic Communities.
Y DNA haplogroup Q, R1az93 and their most close group kurdish for their language. R1AZ93 is basic indo iranian but infact this subclade is a turkic derived genome. Askhenazi jew, conqourer magyars cemeteries full of this halogrup. Recent day krygyz and anarolian turks have this Y DNA and its subclade
Language is Turkic. In Kypchak branch they have common words like: Dank which means Glory in kipchak branch in German it is Danke. Baby is Böbök/bebek. A bit in English Bita in Uzbek and Bitana in Turkish. Even German mean in Turkic Her Man which means all man and the country has name Alemania which means all men. Coz Vizi Goths are Bash Kurt/ Kort
most turks have the J haplogroup like other hairy hooked nose middle easterners.
@@umhvdfjkczxcgjdryjndfjobff l will release a documentary about haplogroup R1AZ93
@@Ersen_abiniz let me know when I will provide u with altaic grammar. Bolmogun = Woll mögen in German and even they use our grammar for past perfect tense -d -t like Boldu be/ oldu mu/ Would be. Even word Get/Git in English Get. How can I get to Istanbul? Do u see bro. In German they add -Ge in past tense GeBraucht, in turkic we add it to the end GelGEn , TuuGAn (doGAn)
@@Ersen_abiniz please google "Saqsin" Turks. Those Saxen and Sachsen were turkic speakers that's why German and English has so many turkisms
#Steppegang 💪🏻
💪🏼
They were ancient Nordic Aryàns
Nordic were hunting and travelling naked living in caves, later they got conquered by this kind of people.
Oxymoron
Not Nordic
But Indo Iranians
Thanx.
Iranians have west asian (caucasian) dna and indians have south asian (dravidian) dna and both of them have native ancestry but their language are indo europian
Okay, we arya btw, not white people.
@@creeper-wm1ix ok , tell me why dravidian speakers in south india have 90~100 percent south asian but north indians have 60~70 percent ?
Ok man germans also have whg. greek and italian(mediterneian)hav anatolian neotlic farmer
The purest people are the Celts and some of the Balto-Slavs, and some of the Indo-Iranians, such as the Tajiks, Yaqnoubi and Nuristani.
But the main criterion is the language. In this way, Turks are not even 1% Turks.
Itanians are zagrosian not caucasian.
😂😂😂😂.
I query the accuracy of this. The sintashta would logically be closer to indo-Iranian peoples.
Very celtic
yes, I am like Purley celtic and got 69% Sintashta DNA
Yes in mythology we were carrying Danvas, in Hinduism danvas proto Celts
Indo Iranian
Name of song ?
And indians say that Aryans were dark as them🤣🤣
Ok now watch that Yamnaya dude 😂 Yes Aryans are dark like us not Nordic, Because our ancestors called themselves Aryans so we are free to call ourselves Aryans. Come on mlecchas don't be too dreamy.
@gatishayajan dargins are basically 41% yamnaya 56% kura araxes with a couple percent barcin _n and 1% east Asian and they are as light as Balkanites. It's a myth that all yamnayans were dark and their closest relatives are Finnish ppl for crying out loud😂😂😂 a couple bs reconstructions of yamnaya that were made with clear bias has unfortunately created this myth that is common amongst a good amount of ppl
@@Yasa5nahaha you arent aryan you are just an indian, %1-2 percent aryan not counts
@@postachamdi6286well aryans were not white and blonded,
@@sahilsingh6048 yes, aryans were tan skinned and with colorful eyes or dark eyes. But the point here they arent indians nor indians arent their descendands. Go take a dna test u will end up seeing you are %80 South asian %20 other such as %5 scandavian %3 chinese etc...
Tharacian DNA and Byzantine DNA Please
Uralic-altaic is more than indian wow, superior! This collapses "indoeuropean" theory... :D
I think all these movies are related to mtdna effect. H, J, K, T, U, V mtdna are european mtdna haplogroups, on the other hand P1, Q1a, Q1b, R1a, R2b ydna are altaian siberia originated ydna haplogroups. As we can understand, I think yamnaya, sintashta, andronovo, afanasievo etc are mixed cultures.
Not from Chinkoids but from Cro-Magnon like West Eurasian individuals, you've no idea about Ancient North Eurasians, They were not the same as modern Siberian Chinkoids, sorry. After the ice age they migrated down to Caucasus, Central Asia ( all extinct), South Asia and Eastern Europe. Outside these places there are some Native American and Siberian groups got ANE ancestry but highly mixed with Chinkoids.
We have no connection with Scandinavians but they have connection with ANE people that's why this common ancestry shows up. That's Aryans who conquered much of Europe and massacred lot of people.
@@Yasa5na All those P1, Q1a, Q1b, R1a, R1b, R2 ydna are originated from southeast asians genetically and these descendants were speaking agglutinative uralic-altaic, native american, dene-yeniseian, sumerian, north caucasian, tyrrhenian-vasconic, dravidian languages not indoeuropean... Indoeuropeans are F, G1, G2, H, I1, I2, J2, K1 ydna haplogroups who are located in europe, middle east, india namely in indoeurope.
North euroasians are modern uyghur turkic, altaic originated people who have ancestral P1, R* ydna even today. Myheritage looks mostly mtdna, so we dont see turkic origins because R, H, V, J, T, U, K mtdna are mostly european maternal linage. If we can see any C3, N2, N3, P1, Q1a, Q1b, R1a, R1b, R2 ydna + A, X, I, W, Y, C, Z, D, G mtdna in altaian siberia, I am sure that we can see enough turkic percentages like we see in Tagar Culture.
@@serkankinden5150 stop bullshit chinkoidism, there's no asiatic gene
There is nothing such as Uralic-Altaic
Yes Iranians are also Europeans initially it’s the same population with one language and similar traditions, they are called the pellazgo-illirians, nowadays Albanians, who have conserved the original language of humanity.
Max Planck Institute in Germany had attested that the roots of the language goes back to at least 9000 years. Of course I believe is more but it’s enough to cut the head of some speculations, manipulations and politisation of history that some moderns have made.
The earliest chariots were found in catacomb culture , not sintashta
Earliest found in Yamnaya
Sintashta is ancestor to all people of iran. Not just persians
Partially. Only 15-20% of your ancestors were Sintashtan.
@KomaD109 got a dna test, and it says 40%
@@Dashuyan88 40% what? And which test?
@@KomaD109 normal dna test
@@Dashuyan88 what's the name?
north euros are genetically the closest to sintashta
indians are iranians are heavily diluted aryans
north indians have highest Aryan DNA is just 23%
You other ancestors are Dravidians, and Iranians Farmers
They tried creating the caste system to keep themselves pure but it didnt work😂
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisboratWhat? where did you get that? IE people were patriarchal not other way around, same thing happened in Euro populations fuked native women killing their partners.
@@RichardEdwards40 But our culture and history 1000× times richer and older than you😂
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat There is no Aryan DNA. Aryans weren't blond and light eyed people. This is myth created by Nazi Germany.
The man is carrier of the R1a group, which today is most common among Slavs, and according to you, he is related to the Scots, Welsh and Irish who have the R1b group, without any sense!!
All the groups you mentioned genetically derive from the Corded Ware culture (which carried both haplogroups, with R1a being more prominent) and Y-DNA haplogroups do not correspond with autosomal DNA
Someone jumped the fence
Read my comments to a comment posted 3 days ago
Read Hinduism sintashtas are Adityas (aduetsch) cousins of Germans and Celts and thank me later
They are different than slavs and are fighting proto Celts and Germans everyday
Slavs are different or different nation
The genetic breakdown makes literally no sense
I am completely lost. Mortified even.
How so?
Why?
@@Quitumbe954why?
It said it in the video, it’s looking at modern populations that are close to the sample. It’s not going to be 100% accurate because the test is for modern people, but it is looking for similarities and those are the populations it sees as being the closest
Strange, your map puts the sintashta north of the Aral sea yet you insinuate that they were ancestral to the indo iranians. Did you consider the ydna data that places the origin of haplogroups p, q and r in south asia?
Mongols even have more sintashta in them than “Persians and Indians”😅
Mongols are Mongoloids, Complex different race . These are caucasians. These people were there 3000 years before mongols .
@@Thorfinn47. check out their autosomal gene
@@LogicaetRatio-r8z
bro Many Iranians in streets look like them
but I do not know about Indians
@@user_18789 Mongols have 16% Sintashta on average but Persians have around 10%
@@user_18789You should visit North India.
These are not the settlements, but the factories ... they lived in round half-dungeons around the factories ...
Yes there was a little smith workshop in EVERY house.
The chariot apparently originated in Mesopotamia in about 3000 bc; monuments from Ur and Tutub depict battle parades that include heavy vehicles with solid wheels, their bodywork framed with wood and covered with skins.
I guess those chariots were driven by bulls since horses were quite recently being domesticated at around that time.
@@spicysealion-et8kfdomesticated by Indo Europeans
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat iirc initially Botai and then mainly by IE
They are talking about horse chariot
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat *Indo Iranins.
Can you do a varangian warrior?
60%I1 and 25%R1a
Nuristani peoples are their real successors unlike Indics and Iranics.
Nuristanis are like 20% Sintashta
meanwhile Pamiris can be up to 45 Sintashta lmao
You should also note that Indo aryan related groups in east afg and northwest Pak have a high amount of light features due to selection and inbreeding (despite that the majority isn't even all light featured)
No, Pamiris are the closest to them.
@@historyandgenes9991 You mean Dardic groups
@@DigoronKavkaz Dardics yes, they actually have less Steppe than believed
I was thinking that these are a descendant culture of proto Indo European, ie Yamania people
If you are an aryan with R1a, the most aryan are the Central Asian Turks, not the Iranians or the Indians 🙂. Even the Huns or Göktürks have autosomal DNA and y dna affinity with Europeans incomparably with Indians and Iranians. Existing theories involve strictly unscientific and political stuff. More accurate and impartial studies should be carried out.
Not based on autosomal dna. Keep in mind that modern Turks absorbed the Caucasoid Indo-European people they conquered and Turkified them. Paternal haplogroup is one component. Autosomal is another
@robertolang9684 What do you mean? Southwestern Europeans have large Anatolian Neolithic Farmer ancestry not Steppe.
Everyone has their crazy take when it comes to genetics. Ancient Turks are ultimately an East Asian people regardless of the people who speak Turkic languages today.
Stop talking about those fu4%g Turks... whose women were once fu25ed by the Scythians just like in India.. These peoples are bastards who today autosomally are what they were before the Scythian invasion... Somewhere you'll find R1a.. "We are Aryans"... LOL... Healing complexes by being a mythomaniac
@@spicysealion-et8kfTurks are south siberian. South siberian and east asian is different.
Chariots existed in Egypt before the existence of these people
No, they didn’t.
Hyksos brought them to Egypt
@@acaydia2982 said who... those who said Colombus was the first who discovered America? Stop the propaganda and bring some facts
@@acaydia2982 said who... Christopher Columbus? Or an other Lier
@@WorldTimes-tm7zt Archeology and every paper I’ve ever read from people from around the world.
The horse was domesticated, and the oldest chariots have been found in Europe.
What did Christopher Columbus lie about?
I believe you are misinterpreting what he set out to do, and why.
We’d all be in burkas and hijabs if he hadn’t.
@@WorldTimes-tm7zt There are tons of papers like this .
faculty.uml.edu/ethan_spanier/Teaching/documents/CP3.5CarneyEgyptianchariot.pdf