Gavin, first of all, thank you for another excelente video. I was kind of having a bad day and your video helped me to cheer up a little bit. I might not have the full theoretical background that you do, but your exploration of Cicero and nature resonates deeply with some themes I've been exploring on my blog. I approach this topic from the perspective of a fragmented universe theory, where just as individuals are fragmented, so too is the universe. Inspired by Carl Sagan’s notion that we are all star dust and the idea that we are the universe observing itself, I’ve crafted a meta-ironic worldview. This perspective sees us as inherently meta-ironic: we reflect the universe - cold, indifferent, and fractured, yet abundant in diversity. If you’re interested, I’d love to share three of my recent posts where I delve into these ideas in more depth. I’ll briefly explain each: 1. The Meta-Ironic Condition: Here, I discuss how major narratives have resurfaced in our meta-ironic age, particularly examining the belief that AI could "save" humanity. 2. In Defense of a Fragmented Theory of Knowledge (FTOK): Embracing the Rhizome of Knowledge: This piece advocates for a fragmented understanding of knowledge, inspired by the rhizomatic theory, which values multiplicity without requiring a unified structure. 3. Celebrating Chaos: A Philosophical and Scientific Critique of Bostrom’s Cosmic Order: Here, I critique Nick Bostrom's notion of cosmic order, arguing for an ethical embrace of chaos that recognizes the universe’s decentralized, diverse nature. I hope these texts can add another layer to our discussion on Cicero’s natural philosophy and the fragmented, multifaceted nature of existence. Let me know what you think! All 3 texts are available on my blog, The Brazilian Mutt (Brazilian Mutt Dot Wordpress Dot Com), or on my Medium Page for free. P.S. I’m honestly unsure what to think about this election-all I know is that Trump is nuts.
@@victoralfonssteuck This is very cool stuff, Victor! I resonate with your interests regarding fragmentation. That’s one reason I love James Joyce so much, as he explores the fragmented nature of the self and how our journey through the universe presents us with fragments of our own selves in miniature. I love the sort of transcendentalist love for nature reflected in humanity and vice versa. If Deleuze and Guattari are right, after all, ontology is fundamentally multiple and mobile and every difference is of infinite value and infinite consequence to the rest of the universe.
@@gavinyoung-philosophy Thanks, Gavin! I also believe everything is connected. Transcendency, for me, it’s a form of collective potential -- when we come together to do something, we can achieve incredible things. Just look at AI and all the advancements we’ve made. We have the power to transcend our differences for a common goal. Unfortunately, that goal has often been capitalism, extermination, and war, but it doesn’t have to be that way. Thanks again for your response-sending warm regards!
I would really suggest you read on some anarchist theory. Like Errico Malatesta (political theory) and Paul Feyerabend ( for a anarchist theory of knowledge). I like Cicero especially his work on Friendship but hard pass from his political views.
Should have known, you lost me at tyrant. I am a political, I see both sides- who has shown mroe control? Trump was in office, did he become a tyrant? Who is in office now-nough said.
Gavin, first of all, thank you for another excelente video. I was kind of having a bad day and your video helped me to cheer up a little bit. I might not have the full theoretical background that you do, but your exploration of Cicero and nature resonates deeply with some themes I've been exploring on my blog. I approach this topic from the perspective of a fragmented universe theory, where just as individuals are fragmented, so too is the universe. Inspired by Carl Sagan’s notion that we are all star dust and the idea that we are the universe observing itself, I’ve crafted a meta-ironic worldview. This perspective sees us as inherently meta-ironic: we reflect the universe - cold, indifferent, and fractured, yet abundant in diversity.
If you’re interested, I’d love to share three of my recent posts where I delve into these ideas in more depth. I’ll briefly explain each:
1. The Meta-Ironic Condition: Here, I discuss how major narratives have resurfaced in our meta-ironic age, particularly examining the belief that AI could "save" humanity.
2. In Defense of a Fragmented Theory of Knowledge (FTOK): Embracing the Rhizome of Knowledge: This piece advocates for a fragmented understanding of knowledge, inspired by the rhizomatic theory, which values multiplicity without requiring a unified structure.
3. Celebrating Chaos: A Philosophical and Scientific Critique of Bostrom’s Cosmic Order: Here, I critique Nick Bostrom's notion of cosmic order, arguing for an ethical embrace of chaos that recognizes the universe’s decentralized, diverse nature.
I hope these texts can add another layer to our discussion on Cicero’s natural philosophy and the fragmented, multifaceted nature of existence. Let me know what you think!
All 3 texts are available on my blog, The Brazilian Mutt (Brazilian Mutt Dot Wordpress Dot Com), or on my Medium Page for free.
P.S. I’m honestly unsure what to think about this election-all I know is that Trump is nuts.
@@victoralfonssteuck This is very cool stuff, Victor! I resonate with your interests regarding fragmentation. That’s one reason I love James Joyce so much, as he explores the fragmented nature of the self and how our journey through the universe presents us with fragments of our own selves in miniature. I love the sort of transcendentalist love for nature reflected in humanity and vice versa. If Deleuze and Guattari are right, after all, ontology is fundamentally multiple and mobile and every difference is of infinite value and infinite consequence to the rest of the universe.
@@gavinyoung-philosophy Thanks, Gavin! I also believe everything is connected. Transcendency, for me, it’s a form of collective potential -- when we come together to do something, we can achieve incredible things. Just look at AI and all the advancements we’ve made. We have the power to transcend our differences for a common goal. Unfortunately, that goal has often been capitalism, extermination, and war, but it doesn’t have to be that way.
Thanks again for your response-sending warm regards!
I would really suggest you read on some anarchist theory. Like Errico Malatesta (political theory) and Paul Feyerabend
( for a anarchist theory of knowledge). I like Cicero especially his work on Friendship but hard pass from his political views.
@@blankname5177 Totally agree. He’s extremely antiquated and problematic. I’m gonna read some Feyerabend soon!
Should have known, you lost me at tyrant. I am a political, I see both sides- who has shown mroe control? Trump was in office, did he become a tyrant? Who is in office now-nough said.