We Slowed Down A Bacterium to One Billionth Of A Second | WORLD PREMIERE

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 448

  • @expensivetechnology9963
    @expensivetechnology9963 หลายเดือนก่อน +85

    There’s common TH-cam content…and then there’s extraordinary content like this. I feel smarter and uplifted.

  • @laurentspiess6557
    @laurentspiess6557 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

    I have dreamt of this video all my life and had tears in my eyes. Thank you.

  • @gloriaharbin1131
    @gloriaharbin1131 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    Beautiful, magnificent….the scale and complexity of life brings me to my knees in awe. Thank you very much for producing this.

  • @placiddocu
    @placiddocu หลายเดือนก่อน +93

    'then to think; this is the most simple lifeform' hit so nice.

    • @gabriellarsson9029
      @gabriellarsson9029 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yeah. Almost made me cry hearing that line.

    • @narrativeless404
      @narrativeless404 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Fr
      There's nothing really "simple" about it at all

    • @Ludifant
      @Ludifant หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, and then to think we try to medicate lifeforms based on VERY simplified models of these emergent complex structures. We don't understand anything and keep shoving it

    • @vivvpprof
      @vivvpprof หลายเดือนก่อน

      Also, that C Major prelude by Bach is the first of the cycle (Well-Tempered Clavier), and certainly the simplest.

    • @chichangwu
      @chichangwu หลายเดือนก่อน

      wow the sugar molecules look almost like seaweed or some underwater carpet plant, i wonder what makes them move like that, is it because of the spinning thing under the sugar molecule? or is it some microscopic wind?

  • @MykolaKindrat
    @MykolaKindrat หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Amazing work! Fascinating and jaw-dropping! Good luck with your future projects!

  • @0FAS1
    @0FAS1 หลายเดือนก่อน +54

    Awesome! Its continually mindblowing that time is scale relative in this manner, I once did the math on how long an "hour" is for a bacteria based on how long an hour is for a human relative to our lifespan. Of course it doesnt make much sense but its interesting to think about how quickly everything moves inside everything. Studying biochem at the moment so I've never been this excited for a youtube video. Talk about an early christmas present! Thank you!

    • @itsalldownhillfromhere7932
      @itsalldownhillfromhere7932 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Well what did you come up with please, it's like me saying once I did the maths on how long I could run my GTI at full throttle ( 200 hp) on 1 gram of matter , like a sugar cube for example which the answer is unbelievable.

    • @KaapoKallio
      @KaapoKallio หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      So, how long is a hour to a bacteria?

    • @juanitoviejo2121
      @juanitoviejo2121 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@itsalldownhillfromhere7932 ,,,,GTI, wait for it...

  • @austinpittman1599
    @austinpittman1599 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Fractality! I love it, man. I just watched a video from PBS Space Time on the "aesthetics" of the electron, and it delved into how the particle itself is virtually unviewable due to Heisenberg Uncertainty. We essentially see the same thing happen here. Stronger resolution to better understand the bacterium's structure effectively requires a lack of momentum, and better understandings of the momentum works to blur the bacterium's structure. The same principle applies at larger and larger scales because more complex structures are subject to the same laws that the fundamental components that make them up are subject to. Complexity just allows for emergent properties in grander systems that we don't see in the baser/individualistic components.

    • @cobalt4161
      @cobalt4161 หลายเดือนก่อน

      check out Joscha Bach if you haven't heard of him

    • @austinpittman1599
      @austinpittman1599 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@cobalt4161 Thanks for the tip, man. I'm heavily interested in the bridge between physics and metaphysics, and people like Michael Levin and the guy you just mentioned seem like great architects for that sort of platform.

    • @JC-nl3nh
      @JC-nl3nh หลายเดือนก่อน

      being able to zoom in is not fractality itself, self similarity on those zooming in and out scales are what makes something fractal.

    • @austinpittman1599
      @austinpittman1599 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @JC-nl3nh I know, the fact that it could be interpreted that we still see principles of Heisenberg Uncertainty at larger and larger scales would imply a self-similar set. Complex patterns arising from baser components combining in a sense of synthesis, and those complex patterns holding true to what the baser components do on individualistic levels, achieving a sense of self-similarity. That's what I was referring to. Bacteria don't "look" like electrons, but a good portion of the laws that govern their behaviors do.

    • @dudeatos
      @dudeatos 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Well, considering that quantum effects are, by definition, limited to the quantum scale, I don’t think what we’re seeing are macroscopic quantum events.

  • @lccsd2392
    @lccsd2392 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Wow, thankyou for putting this up. It is a brilliantly put together idea. I would've thought that pictures of cells and bacteria et al are realized by tiny medical cameras and electron-microscope. I'm happy all the suitable specialists found each other. Congratulations!

  • @joesauvage1165
    @joesauvage1165 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    Hans, as always, deepest thanks for your insights, curiosity, creativity, and passion for understanding and truth and for sharing it with the world.

  • @jamesskinnercouk
    @jamesskinnercouk หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I am in awe at this beautiful work, that people have put such time and effort in creating this and that I can now watch this. Thank you so much team.

  • @TheTurbobond
    @TheTurbobond หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I am grateful to have found this spectacular bit of science and enthusiasm

  • @willbephore3086
    @willbephore3086 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I saw the images he referenced some weeks ago and spent nearly a day being boggled by them, a true instance of Mind Blown. Very cool to know these images also captivated his imagination!

  • @electricshmoo
    @electricshmoo หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    the chart at 10:54 was excellent. well done.

  • @Guu3uu
    @Guu3uu หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    This Video should have 100Million views!

  • @lagopehoe
    @lagopehoe หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Much appreciation to the complexities of these imaging works. Patterns drives logic that drives software, and it is as best as could be

  • @jupol143
    @jupol143 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    So fascinating, gives you real perception of everything is connected

  • @avichlit
    @avichlit หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Fascinating stuff. Map of Territory, while may not be the territory, still incredibly powerful. Thanks for creating

  • @DamianGutierrez-x3g
    @DamianGutierrez-x3g หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank you - lovely to close this great paradox of the complexity and the simplex with Bach also prelude in c major - wow ! Thanks also for all your dialogues with Bernardo!

  • @vivianakani
    @vivianakani หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Truly amazing, thank you for the work that you do

  • @gentlesteps2476
    @gentlesteps2476 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    A wonderful film and so fascinating, thank you!!

  • @NathanaelNewton
    @NathanaelNewton หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is absolutely incredible.. I feel like I could have come to the conclusion that it had to be way slower with a few minutes of thought, but it never really occurred to me before. So nice to see the animations, that must have been so much work.

  • @PolyRocketMatt
    @PolyRocketMatt หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This was a really cool "break" video while learning cell biology. Still amazed at the time-scale differences... My book said lipid molecules in membranes change place with one another about 10^7 times per second, this video put a visual meaning behind it, so thank you!

  • @DamianGutierrez-x3g
    @DamianGutierrez-x3g หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you for topping this master piece of this paradox LIFE ( the pure simplex meeting the quintessential complexity) with prelude in C major -my favorite ever meditation. Love your dialogues with Bernardo !

  • @JP-xv6fr
    @JP-xv6fr หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I literally felt my mind blown !!!

    • @jambec144
      @jambec144 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Literally!? Did you get brain splatter on the ceiling?

  • @ProgressiveEconomicsSupporter
    @ProgressiveEconomicsSupporter หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    And not to forget: all this fast and complex biochemical processes run fully automatic and still perfectly responsive and adaptive to the environment.
    Just think of the vast amount of processes and time steps for a human being just waving a hand for good-bye 😅

  • @heinzgassner1057
    @heinzgassner1057 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Amazing. Humbling.

  • @rpals5412
    @rpals5412 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's not often that I learn something completely new that changes how I see the world. The last time was watching Breaking Taps' microscope, frame-by-frame video of cutting metal. This video is another eye-opener.
    I'm realizing more and more that to truly understand the world, I need to explore it on different scales-both in time and size.
    This animation completely breaks my brain! I can't fully grasp how these individual microscopic pieces can move so incredibly fast without friction tearing them apart or overheating. How do they have the energy to move so much? It's mesmerizing and raises so many questions about the unseen mechanics of life

  • @m.b.blenkoblanka4167
    @m.b.blenkoblanka4167 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Das ist worauf ich gewartet habe

  • @periurban
    @periurban หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Fred Hoyle was famously opposed to the Big Bang theory (even though he gave it its name), and as one piece of evidence for his (now largely discarded) Steady State alternative he carried out a calculation of the chances of a single protein occurring by the operation of random interactions. The number was what is known as an astronomical number, being one so large that the universe is unable to contain it. In other words, for a single protein to be created by random chance the universe would have to be infinitely old.
    That was for a single protein.
    His conclusion - either the universe is infinite, or something created the universe specifically to generate complexity in a finite time.

    • @jambec144
      @jambec144 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      So when eg. the Hindenburg exploded, all those quintrillions of hydrogen atoms united with all those oxygen atoms by pure chance? There aren't any laws of chemistry that actually govern these things? Molecules are never assembled by having atoms leap together randomly. Otherwise, synthesis of pretty much any polymer becomes impossible. If you want to know how a complex molecule came to be, you study the initial conditions. No chemist would assume that the constituent atoms just flew together by chance.
      Couple this with the fact that there is in essence no way of calculating the odds of whether a god put things together (unless you know something about the details of how supernatural beings can cause things to happen!). So even if we were to accept Hoyle's calculation, resorting to supernatural "explanations" simply amounts to sweeping the mystery under a rug.
      And almost nobody assumes that life started with proteins anyway.
      BTW, you should be wary of appealing to Hoyle's authority. He was something of a nutjob. For example, he believed that insects are intelligent(!?) More pertinent to your theological argument, he believed that organic life was created by aliens with a silicon-based chemistry, and not a god.

    • @periurban
      @periurban หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@jambec144
      Nice reply!
      Hoyle wasn't talking about molecules, which are governed by well understood mechanisms, even if the answers to the underlying "why is it like that" questions elude us (well, me anyway).
      When Hoyle was writing, the prevailing wisdom was that proteins had assembled over time by the application of random events. I'm not sure what the prevailing wisdom is, but I haven't heard a convincing explanation. Doesn't mean there isn't one!
      Hoyle believed many things over his incredibly successful life, including panspermia and the steady state. Some were right, some were not.
      I don't think the intelligence of insects is in dispute is it? They clearly have a kind of intelligence, don't they? Having said that, I don't remember Hoyle's argument on that one.
      But you make a good point, even the smartest people can occasionally be stupid!
      [To be clear, I wasn't using Hoyle as any kind of authority. I was simply trying to point out that the mechanisms described in the video are so incredibly complex and refined that they seem to defy everything we think we know about the nature of the universe. Hoyle's calculation seemed pretty robust, and even if it was off by orders of magnitude it would still be a useful and indicative result.]

    • @nycbearff
      @nycbearff 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Fred was smart, but wrong about some things. Proteins occur naturally, but they don't occur by the operation of random interactions, so that wrong assumption will always lead to ridiculous conclusions. There is no need for a creator of the universe - that's just a claim to fill in the gaps when people don't understand the natural processes that lead to things like proteins. Or rain, or conception, or microbes - all those were also attributed to divine intervention until science figured out how they actually work.

  • @Peter-42istheAnswer
    @Peter-42istheAnswer 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    That's insane! I had no idea so much was happening in a bacteria in just one second. This was the perfect way to show it - my mind was blown and will be forever.

  • @ChristianGonzalez-p8p
    @ChristianGonzalez-p8p 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Congratulations!! How we need concepts and statments like this!!

  • @scooterdoo.ily2
    @scooterdoo.ily2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Kind of a bittersweet one there. And then you mentioned meta physical and philosophical part i 😅😅 kinda blushed and tried to come to realize how i would resonate at an resonating level in order to keep my own balance in check. I love art and science!

  • @martinkaufmann4067
    @martinkaufmann4067 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Is it possible to get the picture of a cell at 8.00 minutes? It is amazing!

  • @Haplo-san
    @Haplo-san หลายเดือนก่อน

    I always loved to watch those complex inner cell work animations and I always wondered about how they do that; but more than that, I always wondered how they have learned the works of the mechanism down to electron level. I love the art of science.

  • @jasonshapiro9469
    @jasonshapiro9469 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Oh dang! Yall are like bacterium artist. 8:06 that would look great in black light

    • @TheParadoxDestroyer
      @TheParadoxDestroyer หลายเดือนก่อน

      I want a large print of that to frame as artwork. It's Klee on an acid trip.

  • @robertvandenberg2883
    @robertvandenberg2883 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Do not 'worship' the images you created, in other words:
    "All models are wrong, some are useful"
    "The map is not the territory"

  • @Meditation409
    @Meditation409 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    That was Massively Amazing! Talk about mind blowing!!! Wow 😮. It takes 30 years to see what normally takes maybe minutes to see at 1 billion times slowed down! 😱 I'm definitely going to watch the documentary when it airs in 5 days! ❤

    • @j.thomas1420
      @j.thomas1420 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Nowadays, the best slow motion can capture images at around 156.3 trillion frames per second. Imagine that.

    • @zzausel
      @zzausel หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@j.thomas1420 This is no real slow motion. SM depends on natural visibility.

    • @Littleprinceleon
      @Littleprinceleon หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The movie will be just a small excerpt: will last only 13 hours.

    • @Meditation409
      @Meditation409 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@j.thomas1420 Amazing!!! 😮

  • @DeyRADIANCE
    @DeyRADIANCE หลายเดือนก่อน

    A universal principle at beautiful display, timescales across spacescales. Relatively speaking, smaller(all a matter of our perception and perspective) move faster when observed from our paradigm, and larger objects move faster.
    We can also appreciate the ability of our consciousness to shape itself to shift time and space.
    From a practical sense, the larger the goal, the more time it takes to manifest.
    Thank you. ❤

  • @RichardHarlos
    @RichardHarlos หลายเดือนก่อน

    This absolutely blew my mind. First time to your channel. Liked and subscribed, and commenting for the algorithm :) Cheers!

  • @cridizarro
    @cridizarro หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for sharing this work!

  • @jb_
    @jb_ หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice one Hans! Was always gobsmacked by those crazy looking molecular animations, which show regimented machine-like behaviour -really trippy to watch. Didn't know the extent of the speed thing, that's nuts. Quite something that we humans have crafted, and finessed, the technology to uncover incredible details of biological complexity. Really looking forward to the documentary.

  • @nerdwhispererscottyj.3912
    @nerdwhispererscottyj.3912 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have long been awestruck by the complexity of cellular structures, especially ribosomes. Seeing how incredibly fast the molecular processes work within those structures is mind blowing. My metaphysical insight: Life is the thing that says, "Entropy? I ain't got time for that!"

  • @SyIe12
    @SyIe12 หลายเดือนก่อน

    EXCELLENT WORK I LOOK FORWARD TO NEW VIDEOS! THANK YOU!!!

  • @Highandidle81
    @Highandidle81 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You are, what they eat! This is awe inspiring and humbling in equal measures.

  • @pon1
    @pon1 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Didn't know the processes were that fast, to think that it would take 30 years for that second to pass was mind-boggling since the movement didn't look slow, it seemed like the natural timescale for those processes.

  • @williamcallahan5218
    @williamcallahan5218 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I was reading Chandrakirti this morning which really set the mood for this. Thank you so much, amazing.

  • @user-qs1xz2mx6f
    @user-qs1xz2mx6f หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How fascinating! Life is a miracle. We must be an entire Universe for these bacteria. I would not surprised if they are also host for even smaller life elements.

  • @davidnorman6348
    @davidnorman6348 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you! A gripping and wonder-full video. We humans are restricted by our need to analyse and comprehend the universe primarily through vision. Nearly all information we gather must be presented in the form of charts, graphs, photos, illustrations, films and so on. We cannot (yet) grasp the dimensions of chemical and physical communication going on in a cell or bacterium.

  • @stephen7774
    @stephen7774 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This video confirms the fractal nature of the universe and that the smaller things get the faster they move and rotate.

  • @rachmondhoward2125
    @rachmondhoward2125 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Mind blowing! Thanks

  • @alejandropflucker4857
    @alejandropflucker4857 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    THIS DISCOVERY SHOW CLEARLY HOW THE MICROCOSMOS IS SO COMPLEX AS A MACROCISMOS IN DIFFERENT SCALA....AND HOW MAGIC IS THE REALITY BEYOND OUR SIMPLE EXPERIENE.....THE INCREDIBLE RRALITY BEYOND REALITY THAT NEVER END....AS A GAME OF MIRRORS.....IN MOVEMENT .....REALLY BEYOND WORDS.....

  • @SparcBR
    @SparcBR หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    How do you know that each molecule meets each other molecule in one second?

    • @TSK0209
      @TSK0209 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      Because in the video they explain that as you visualize smaller and smaller physical scales down to a bacterium level, there’s the same time scale fold of things seeming faster and faster.
      Think of looking out at galaxy’s and how it takes millions of years to see changes in those. So the bigger things get the slower things move relative to size.

    • @Ahov
      @Ahov หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      We also have atoms
      from all historic figures.

    • @pixelpoet
      @pixelpoet หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Good question dude but you seem to have ‘experts’ weighing in with replies 😊

    • @cormorant4161
      @cormorant4161 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      It's a good question, and it exposes an assumption: that the motion of each molecule is random. Imagine vigourously shaking a jar half-filled with marbles. Eventually, on average, every marble will have collided with every other marble, and the bigger the jar of marbles, the more statistically certain can we be that this is true for, say, 99.9% of the marbles. In the bacterium, however, molecular movement is not necessarily random. There will be binding events, reactions, and directed motion due to, for example, charge separations.

    • @rvs1
      @rvs1 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I'd like to add to @cormorant4161 comment regarding statistics. It's not so much knowing that each molecule meets every other molecule in a second, it's more that its extremely unlikely that it will not meet every other molecule within that second. It's not explained as explicitly in the video but the main factor here is individual molecule velocity.
      If you look for "how fast do individual water molecules move at ambient temperature" will give you an average result of 590m/s.
      So if a small 'liquid" molecule moves at 590m/s in a space of 1 um without any obstacles it can traverse that distance if it were a vacuum about 590.000.000 times per second (590 [m/s] / 0.000001 [m] = 5.9*10^8 [1/s] i.e. 590.000.000 times per second).
      I don't know how to add collisions of millions of molecules at this time frame and present it in simple mathematical terms, so you'll just have to "imagine" that bit. For myself the imagining is made somewhat more easy given the extreme velocities of these little molecules and the small space of a bacterium.
      Context note: molecular velocity is directly related to it's temperature. Or rather, temperature is a "bulk unit" based on the total conserved kinetic energy (i.e. velocity) of individual molecules within a certain volume.
      I hope this helps understanding.

  • @chrisallard1819
    @chrisallard1819 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Astounding - love it - thank you!

  • @Yamazaki339
    @Yamazaki339 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amazing video! Thank you so much!

  • @TellMeWhereItHurts1977
    @TellMeWhereItHurts1977 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Mindblowing, well done. It would be interesting to relate the information about speed of those processes to speed of electric impulses (as in neural tissue, for example).

  • @naota3k
    @naota3k หลายเดือนก่อน

    Super cool, mate. Hard to believe the complexity in such a small part of what is usually a much more complex whole.

  • @ProgressiveEconomicsSupporter
    @ProgressiveEconomicsSupporter หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you so much for visualizing this crazy stuff.
    Being a Biochemist, I early realized how crazy all of this is.
    How on earth could transcription factor protein quickly find their bindings site, even on partly dens packed DNA?
    Could you imagine a single bacterium with its DNA as a single family house packed full with spaghetti?? 😎🙏🇩🇪

  • @benjaminbeard3736
    @benjaminbeard3736 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Holy shit man, this is so impressive and so insightful. The timescale difference is easy to overlook and not fully grasp. I'm sure I still don't grasp it, but thanks for the hard work and thought that goes into something like this. I'm sure I don't grasp that either.

  • @dieodd9866
    @dieodd9866 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is so wonderful!Thank you!

  • @TomWaldgeist
    @TomWaldgeist หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Can we see the video / image of the eukaryotic cell somewhere?

  • @francoislechampi2002
    @francoislechampi2002 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Plz do more of these

  • @FigmentHF
    @FigmentHF หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    incredible, thank you!

  • @UrantiaRevelationChannel
    @UrantiaRevelationChannel 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Extraordinary amazing thank you

  • @Dvpainter
    @Dvpainter หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I wonder if we will have (if we don't already?) supermaterials that can passively translate x-ray light into visible light and stare at things like this in realtime

    • @nycbearff
      @nycbearff 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      X-ray light is too powerful to use that way - it would kill the bacterium instantly. The biggest difficulty is finding a way to watch the interior of a cell at that level of detail without killing it - people are working on that problem, but so far with very little success.

  • @MixelKiemen
    @MixelKiemen หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Love the ending "It's not the territory it's the map", great work Hans !

    • @zzausel
      @zzausel หลายเดือนก่อน

      It is theoretically impossible for any map to carry as much information as the reality. And now imagine the realities behind.

    • @MixelKiemen
      @MixelKiemen หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@zzausel sure this is self-evident. So how come people often look at the map as if it is the territory? This failure to recognize is part of Don Hoffsman's case against reality.

    • @zzausel
      @zzausel หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@MixelKiemen It takes this little failure, may be in our amygdala, to destroy our wonderful scientific way of recognition.

  • @Ludifant
    @Ludifant หลายเดือนก่อน

    This reminds me of primordial particle animations.. very simple rules, forming cells spontaneously, more like conways life, but in free two D space without raster

  • @DieBieneFranz
    @DieBieneFranz หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is awesome!

  • @chrischen82
    @chrischen82 หลายเดือนก่อน

    WOW! 8-) That's amazing!!! I'm so curious what the whole movie will bring along.
    10^♾👍

  • @dominikamann1872
    @dominikamann1872 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Beautiful. Thank you. :)

  • @iambliscanna1592
    @iambliscanna1592 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This needs to be part of our new educational system, a true system of education.

  • @Leonardo_A1
    @Leonardo_A1 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video thanks a lot

  • @EngineerNick
    @EngineerNick หลายเดือนก่อน

    That was amazing. Sure its just a model but wow. Just wow

  • @2012Tomstar
    @2012Tomstar หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great! Thank you!! 👍👍

  • @someobscurename
    @someobscurename หลายเดือนก่อน

    I could be totally wrong on this because it's been many years since I've read it, but I believe Madeleine L'Engle explored this concept of microcosmic time in her book A Wind in the Door. Vaguely recall Meg being shrunk down to talk with her brother's cellular components to convince them to heal him from a deadly disease.

  • @LuigiCotocea
    @LuigiCotocea หลายเดือนก่อน

    You know what else vibrates fast, the air molecules in your room! Some bump to your body at speed of sound though the air is still!

  • @heartofinfinity
    @heartofinfinity หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great vid. Respect. And thank you.

  • @markeisley299
    @markeisley299 หลายเดือนก่อน

    4:00 we know how bacteria form these patterns. they have certain structural nodes that attract each otter. since molecules only bond in very specific angles, you will get distinct geometric shapes.

    • @nycbearff
      @nycbearff 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      That's a hypothesis, not yet a fact.

  • @jasonneugebauer5310
    @jasonneugebauer5310 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Awe inspiring look at the cosmic complexity of life at nano scale.

  • @markus4013
    @markus4013 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The dashboard sure is complicated.

    • @findingwisdomdotme
      @findingwisdomdotme หลายเดือนก่อน

      Right so let's discard it all and value a world of pure abstraction that you can never perceive.
      And no, your nondual awareness/consciousness ain't gonna help you with that, hippie.

    • @markus4013
      @markus4013 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @ No. But, you feel free to go right ahead. Have fun with that.

  • @patrickdegrijs11
    @patrickdegrijs11 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    There is no simple life. All life is soo complex. Just because a bacteria is "simpler" than a bigger animal does not say it's simple. Life is amazing.

  • @amirsa7140
    @amirsa7140 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    I'm a phd student in mechanical engineering, and also a huge nerd in everything, about 8 years ago i saw a video of dna replication from wehi, that was a huge moment for me, suddenly my perspective of the world has changed and i couldn't sleep well for a while and fell in a rabbit hole of biology, i saw most of ibiology seminars, suddenly cosmos and astronomy fell into second place in my favorite list, but today, after watching this video, i felt strongly that i should start researching biology academically, but I've a career in mechanical engineering, I don't know how i can fulfill this urgent need :((

    • @marksandford1522
      @marksandford1522 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How many hands have you got…..how many fingers after that. You were obviously made for more……take it.

    • @marksandford1522
      @marksandford1522 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Fab vid. Thanks!

    • @willbephore3086
      @willbephore3086 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I understand what you mean with life changing moments of witnessing something so profoundly moving.
      You're certainly a ways down the financial and time dedication path in mechanical engineering, but I wonder if there is some way to make the knowledge or skills overlap. Even if it hasn't been done before. Someone has to be the first person to do a thing, so why not you?

    • @fabienl4979
      @fabienl4979 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Sadly there’s not enough time in a life time to master such different subject. Micro biologist spend a lifetime to grasp really well the subject to publish and make maybe some advancement.
      But I understand this urge to try to understand all those subject each more passioning than the other. So much cool thing to learn and see the life differently

    • @myronplatte8354
      @myronplatte8354 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Apply mechanical engineering to biology. Or biology to mechanical engineering.

  • @mgillespiedesign
    @mgillespiedesign หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is simply sunning!

  • @versiop
    @versiop 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Beautiful!

  • @mnamnam6061
    @mnamnam6061 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow.👍 Do you also mention about what's unknown in that animation? Hope so.
    If YT reminds me, oh yes I gonna watch it.

  • @GEEKCONCEPT
    @GEEKCONCEPT หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very nice !

  • @truvelocity
    @truvelocity หลายเดือนก่อน

    I get that it’s a representation. But, I also can’t wait to get a representation of all of the functions slowed down like an interactive model to zoom in and out of. That would be a great educational tool of the future.

  • @billyranger2627
    @billyranger2627 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Brilliant. More.

  • @byram101
    @byram101 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In every way... life becons out that there is a designer and creator for each element and process of our infinitely complex world.

    • @atgtrading
      @atgtrading หลายเดือนก่อน

      To think all of this complexity at such a 'basic' cellular level came from nothing, by nothing from pure chance - I feel is more of stretch than believing a creator/designer is responsible. I am not religious either, but I do believe in some sort of higher power, it really is the only logical explanation for all of this.

    • @nycbearff
      @nycbearff 28 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      Researchers are close to figuring out how life could have evolved from inorganic chemistry. Just because we haven't figured out how this all evolved doesn't mean something created it - we understand more and more about how life evolved every day. Saying "It must have been created" because you don't understand something is unwarrented. Say "I don't understand this", instead - it's ok to not understand everything.

  • @leannaerickson9745
    @leannaerickson9745 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Do you think that this wonderful video was developed at the behest of (a) bacterium (a) that want(s) you to understand it (them)? This video was brilliant!

  • @we4selradio591
    @we4selradio591 หลายเดือนก่อน

    @12:25 "And it all just happened by chance...right?" The famous powerlifting Coach Nowicki

  • @aniksamiurrahman6365
    @aniksamiurrahman6365 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Where I can find the paper?

  • @mreese8764
    @mreese8764 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Does the title make sense? You can slow down something 1 billion times but to one billionth of a second?

  • @LaercioHenrique
    @LaercioHenrique หลายเดือนก่อน

    Que informações fascinantes. O aprendizado ao longo dessa produção é muito intenso.
    Muito obrigado por ensinar tanta coisa. Com a tradução IA eu pude ter acesso a esse conhecimento também. 🇧🇷

  • @awykus
    @awykus หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great content!

  • @earthhitterworldtripper
    @earthhitterworldtripper หลายเดือนก่อน

    I was making lunch and I simply froze in awe when the animation came at 12;00 🙃

  • @Merulius
    @Merulius หลายเดือนก่อน

    de landmeter
    Het is niet alleen onverschilligheid, in zekere zin
    is het misschien zelfs wel liefde die hem dwingt,
    er is geen paradijs zonder rentmeester.
    Hij is gelukkig met het landschap, maar gelukkig
    met het zoeken, coördinaten wijzen hem zijn onzichtbare
    plek, zijn utopie is de kaart, niet de wereld.
    Hij wil weten waar hij is, maar zijn troost is
    te weten dat de plek waar hij is niet anders bestaat
    dan in zijn eigen formule, hij is een gat in de vorm van
    een man in het landschap. Met de grenzen die hij
    trekt, scherper en duidelijker, vervagen het gras
    en de bomen en alles wat daar leeft, lijdt en sterft.
    Het is heel helder om hem heen, alles is waargenomen.
    Rutger Kopland 1982

  • @bemm6035
    @bemm6035 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    They are the powerhouse of the cell, and the reason we came to be.

  • @0ptimal
    @0ptimal หลายเดือนก่อน

    Scales of time and space are fascinating. There is a lot to be revealed. We see the bacterias lifespan happen quickly, but to that bacteria, if it were aware, you could assume it would experience a similarly eventful life as we do. Same things, different scales. To something, the happenings of the large scale universe could be occurring very quickly. Galaxy formation, a blink.

  • @familyacct3367
    @familyacct3367 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Where is the “program” that runs the bacteria?

    • @williammaxwell2239
      @williammaxwell2239 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Morphic Fields?

    • @bennomomsen5554
      @bennomomsen5554 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Try Gromacs, NAMD, ... There is plenty of molecular dynamics software packages from open source to commercial ones to do this kind of simulations.

    • @cthulhuhoops7538
      @cthulhuhoops7538 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@bennomomsen5554I don't think that's what he meant.

    • @nycbearff
      @nycbearff 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      It's not a computer. Different parts are governed by different mechanisms. There is no "program" the way computers have programs, but it has DNA, RNA, membrane inheritance, and the laws of physics, among other ways of coordinating itself.

  • @eion-stephenson
    @eion-stephenson หลายเดือนก่อน

    The impossibility of evolution, combined with the reality of creation, incorporated into alien technology, surrounded by gamification. How to interpret life. A pondering from the beginning to the next. Imagine, we haven't even discussed the impact of RF EMF on this delicate environment.

    • @eion-stephenson
      @eion-stephenson หลายเดือนก่อน

      May I add, what an amazing video. Such dedication we can all appreciate. The words do not exist to express your achievement. Thank you for showing us the fabric of existence.

    • @nycbearff
      @nycbearff 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Evolution is happening all around us, and a lot of that is well documented. So claiming that evolution is impossible is profoundly ignorant. Add to that the huge fossil record of thousands of intermediate transitional fossils leading to speciation, and the only way to deny that evolution is real is to put your fingers in your ears and close your eyes whenever you are presented with the evidence.