EU's New Pact on Migration and Asylum Explained
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 ต.ค. 2023
- The New Pact on Migration and Asylum marks a significant step in the European Union's ongoing efforts to address the challenges of rising immigration, now at its highest levels since 2016. This paper will explore the New Pact's five fundamental pillars, shedding light on their implications. Furthermore, we'll examine the persistent disagreements among member states, which have hindered the EU's ability to present a unified approach. Finally, we'll present a critical analysis of the New Pact, assessing its strengths and weaknesses within the current landscape of immigration in the European Union.
Support the Channel:
💁♂️ Patreon: / eumadesimple
☕ Buy me a Coffee: www.buymeacoffee.com/EUMadeSi...
📷 TH-cam: / theeumadesimple
Source 1: ZDF, Maybritt Illner, Abschreckung statt Aufnahme,
www.zdf.de/politik/maybrit-il...
Source 2: DW, EU's Mediterranean leaders meet as migrant numbers rise
www.dw.com/en/eus-mediterrane...
Source 3: Euronews, In new breakthrough, EU countries agree new rules to manage future migration crises
www.euronews.com/my-europe/20...
Source 4: Politico, What’s actually in the EU’s migration deal?
www.politico.eu/article/eu-mi....
Source 5: Relief Web, Data and trends - Arrivals and displaced populations
reliefweb.int/report/ukraine/...
Source 6: Reuters, Poland, Hungary stand alone in opposing EU migration reform
www.reuters.com/world/europe/...
Source 7: TVPWorld, Over 26,000 deportations, but 250,000 irregular arrivals in EU in 2023
tvpworld.com/73239010/over-26...
Source 8: Euronews, EU Migration Reform Enters Final Stretch
www.euronews.com/my-europe/20...
Source 9: European Parliament, Repatriation: how many migrants in the EU are sent back?
www.europarl.europa.eu/news/e...
0:30 “ILLEGAL” immigrants, not “irregular”
What is the difference?
I think you mean economic insurgents
Irregular can mean anything, it is downplaying it@@tomorrowneverdies567
@@tomorrowneverdies567 The difference is that they're trying to soften the term in the name of political correctness.
Illegal migrants clearly suggests that they're breaking the law and immigrate illegally.
@@tomorrowneverdies567 irregular sounds more like "my visa expired" after legal immigration, meanwhile illegal sounds more like "0 documents and smugled into the country"
The only solution is to tow every single boat back to North Africa.
And fine their governments for allowing this.
The EU might raise an intelligence service dedicated to finding and capturing the organizers of immigrant convoys?
What for? The EU knows very well who are the ones sending people from Africa and Middle East to Europe.
EU just don't care.
That would take too much balls and make too much sense. Not the EU's modus operandi.
@@Merle1987 and not national governments' modus operandi either.
i mean thats kind of what Frontex does
@@ebbeb9827 Frontex is useless
This situation was encouraged by Angela Merkel who, in 2015, 'invited' all to come to Germany. This was against EU rules, and against the wishes of some member states, but she did it anyway. Merkel opened the tap, and now it can't be turned off so easily.
It was even against her own paty's wishes but she pushed for it since she was the boss.
This is because Angela Merkel first made a Palestinian little girl cry on national TV because she was being sent back to Palestine.
@@CIutchX Interesting, thank you.
Sorry, but I do not see how Merkel was responsible for any other country outside of Germany. Hungary for example, has zero such illegal immigrants. Nobody forced Sweden, Netherlands, Austria, Belgium, France, the UK, to take them. The chancellor of Germany does not have such authority obviously. So please blame the respective governments and not Angela Merkel.
@@tomorrowneverdies567Hungary has plenty of such people and Orban literally gave them a free pass to go to Austria, while playing the racist card too. Then again, you’re racist, so y’all are horrible and you don’t care.
If all leaders of EU countries thought like Orban, we wouldn't have a crisis
We dont have a crisis!
Yes you do, the EU is a joke.
@@brunoheggli2888traitor
Completely agree
Truth is very few are returned when asylum application is rejected. Also those granted asylum will still move around Europe to where they intended to settle. They will still come unless they understand it’s a pointless journey.
Migration is still a competence belonging to the national states and not to the EU. So, Italy has all the right in the world to forbid any ship with migrants on board to dock an Italian harbour and to make the owners of that ship and the NGO's financially liable with fines, so big that if they break this rule they're bankrupt immediately.
Just sink the invasion boats already. Any country that doesnt is simply not a serious country.
But italy is forced to take victims of shipwreck by some other Agreement...
Those migrants pose as shipwrecked sailors
@@dave_sic1365 Two possible solutions. One: Italy withdraws from that agreement. Two: A ship that carries any migration candidate will be fined with fines big enough to make the shipowner bankrupt immediately and the NGO's that have helped this ship to reach Italy.
Two simple solutions for complicated problems. But you need the bravery to effictively do something about the abuses your country has to go through.
@@francoispignon7459 All you're saying is that I'm right. Migration is still a national competence and not a competence of the EU. Which gets proven daily by the refusal of a.o. Poland and Hungary to let migrants enter their territory. If the EU had anything to say about the matter, then also those Eastern countries would be obligated (forced) to take in migrants.
The problem with the ECJ is of a different nature. You should wonder why the Eastern countries (like Poland and Hungary, but not only these two) are permitted to not allow migrants on their territory. Except maybe as transient people. But such people can transit your territory in an accompanied way. Secondly, the ECJ has to monitor that every country of the EU follows the Human Rights. But nobody in the world can force you to follow the Human Rights. Sure, you'll get sued by the ECJ. But, taken into account how long a trial before the ECJ takes (included the appeal), several years can pass before you are effectively sentenced for that breach in Human Rights. In the meantime, you send a very clear signal. Next, you must face a choise: accepting your condamnation or not accepting it. Right, you put the EU in a crise if you don't accept it. But make no mistake: France (and Italy) are two major players in the EU and are too important to reject as a member. By the way, there exist no procedure to kick nations out of the EU (a fact where nations as Poland and Hungary took or are taking advantage of). In any case, to solve the problem within the EU you can demand measures hard as nails to prevent problems like Lampredusa for ever and ever. The only question you need to ask: is it worth for you to take this to the next level or not? France didn't. That's all I can say.
Concerning the ECHR, the same can be said.
Sure, the EU intervenes in migration. As it is her right. But so far the EU has made no EU-law concerning migration. Otherwise, there wouldn't be a problem. All the EU tries to do is to find common ground among its members. So far, this hasn't worked once. Proving that migration is still a competence that belongs to the different nations of the EU. And any nation can decide to bring the fight to the EU itself. The only thing you need to do, is to have the political courage to go for that fight. France clearly has opted NOT to go for that fight. But a next government can choose differently.
@@francoispignon7459 Migration remains a difficult subject for every politician. Probably because they all live miles away from any migrant. But the resuluts of their incapability to take a firm decision it this matter, have been desastrous.
As a Frenchman, I don't need to tell you that the parties, that invented these rules, are wiped out in elections. And the far right is coming up. Because they alone seem to understand the refusal of the people to have any more migrants from the Mahgreb nations and the African nations. Because they've proven on different occasions to be the hardest people to integrate.
Even in France, I expect, by the next presidential elections, we'll get a run off between the far right and the far left. Also in Flanders it is the far right that's about to win the next elections, carried by the popular demands of another migration policy and an independent Flanders.
This quest for independence is logical. Because no Francophone party wants to form a coalition with them. And a coalition is needed in Belgium. So, no Belgium, no more problems. And the Francophones are costing us much too much money - for 60 years, already - to keep them afloat, without the slightest improvement of their economy. Flanders just needs to pay and pay, with no end in sight. And, in the end, there's very little love left between Flemings and Francophones, mostly because the constant discrimination of the Frencophones against the Flemings in the past (and currently; there is still no political equality in this country).
Anything that takes 5 years to implement is at best a stalling tactic, not a solution. That aside, I don't think the subject of migration is an easy one. There needs to be an EU wide effort in processing migrants and integrating the ones we offer asylum to, islands with a local population of 6000 people cannot be expected to host 10000 migrants. But the EU also needs to do a better job of saying no to illegal migration, if it continues at the same rate, how long until people in The Netherlands, Estonia, Croatia and Romania become as anti-migrant as Italy, Spain, Greece and Germany?
We already are anti immigration in Romania my friend, the only reason we are not in the streets is because most illegal immigrants don't come here. But the moment we are forced to have them, we will start protesting
you don't know what you're talking about, those countries mentioned earlier are way more anti-migrant than italy, spain, greece & germany 😂
Germany anti-migrant. You must be joking? Maybe you looked too much into media coverage of the oppositional party AfD, they are only at ~20% in recent elections, much, but not much enough to change the current course as other parties refuse to cooperate with them (it is called the "Brandmauer" = "Fire wall" in the political discussion). Anyway, Germany has a very pro-migrant government right now.
States should act in the interrest of their own population. Therefore we need to take 0 migrants, and deport around 30 million people.
It is time for Europe to take serious measures against migrants, otherwise migrants and European leaders will destroy the civilized world. Islamists do not follow the laws of civilization, they bring their medieval rules and do terrible things. See what they are doing in their Muslim countries. How many prosperous Muslim countries do you know? Their mentality is very cruel, they hate Jews, they hate everyone, even each other. Does Europe really want such neighbors who kill the people who sheltered them?
In my view, yes, if Australia and Japan were able to do it, why can't the EU take similar measures? I mean, the European Union shares a geographical border with Africa, which could be utilized to manage and deter illegal migration effectively, employing prompt returns and a prohibition on assistance and rescue ships, so that individuals are aware they won't be directed to Europe."
yes
hi
I think the real problem is because there are 27 countries with their own ideas on what to do, so they end up pulling in different directions.
Also, the EU is boarded with a lot of poor countries, which makes it a lot more challenging compared to Australia which, let's be blunt, is in the middle of nowhere and much easier to protect its boarders, to get a bit of an idea on that, just look at the US with Mexico, the EU on the other hand has it much worse because of its geographic.
But personally, I think the real problem in the EU is that the EU has limited powers in what it can do in this situation, too much of it lies with the members and that for me is where the real problem is, EU countries will likely have to give the EU more powers in these areas if they really want an effective policy that works, otherwise, we're just going to keep seeing a patch up job that might work in the short term but doesn't in the long run.
It's also crazy that the EU union has open boarders among themselves and yet doesn't have a single policy at the EU level, if you have open boarders among yourselves, it's clear that the EU should have the powers in enforcing the boarders for its members.
So let's see how many more patch up jobs we'll get before reality kicks in and the members give the EU the powers to deal with these problems.
Because Europe has a large 5th column that demands bringing everyone who's poorer than us here.
Of course they can do it, it is not difficult. But that does not mean it will happen.
I do not understand
If I want to go to the USA
But my visa is rejected
Just trow out my id and pretend to be an asylum seeker and the must take me
Makes no sense
Just come legally 😅
Exactly!
You would have to be on the American land without any ID nor anything in that case this would require long legal procedures since they wouldn't know where to deport you. But again you would have to appear in us out of nowhere.
Do as the Aussies did. Turn the boats around! Its really not that complicated. You have to be hard about the decision until the message gets through.
Can? yes, ability is there. But for some reason there is no will among eu politicians.
We should do as australia you came illegaly fine, we will process you outside the eu and you are banned from entering for over 5 years.
Australia now looks like Asia.
@@SP95 it is inhabited by chinese, indian etc. people.
@@tomorrowneverdies567Two peoples who begged europeans to leave their countries.
@@SP95 so?
@@tomorrowneverdies567So that is called hypocrisy turned into a scam.
Right now I do not see how this deal will significantly reduce illegal emigration. And as non-EU citizen I think EU should find a way to throw back every illegal border crosser. They commit crime from the very first day by illegal crossing and they simply should not be allowed to stay. None of them.
If EU wants to build good society they should not allow criminals to enter.
I agree, there should be a legal mechanism for people to apply for asylum but for those who enter illegally they should not be allowed to stay, which would solve the problem of many people arriving in small boats
@@liamkitson4318let me surprise you... ThERE IS.
The problem is that the migrants don't care and unfortunatly tge leftist degenarates in Brussels and the white criminals on the NGO boats also don't care.
If you’re not an EU citizen, mind your business thank you.
@@hamzapetridis206if you dont have a fully developed brain then stop commenting
@@hamzapetridis206 who are you to criticize others. By the look of your face you are probably one of those human traficers thet is getting rich of others misery and you probably should be in a prison.
So if EU leaders cares so much about human rights then they should pay out of their own pocket, why are they pushing a whole continent into this?
true
Wrong!
@@brunoheggli2888 about what?
As a Swede, with more restrictive views of migration (due to the situation in Sweden), I would think the pact is ok, but mor focus should be on not receiving a single migrant (asylum seeker) as it is an open invitation and many go underground and can't be located again once they enter the EU. I do believe that we must help asylum seekers, I would personally opt for a solution whereby the EU has locations in third countries where asylum seekers should be transferred to and if they have right to asylum, stay there untill they aren't persecuted anymore. Furthermore, the EU should allow a max cap on the number of asylum seekers it can process and anyone else shouldn't be allowed. This is a pragmatic view, as we don't have infinite amounts of resources. I believe that it would be a system that all states could accept, especially from a financial perspective. I know that international public law can go against such a system, but the alternative can be that the entire system breaks, as it is in Sweden, i.e. that a very large proportion of people are totally sick of migrants and very radical proposals are seen as normal
When it comes to finances it probably is not that much of a problem. The EU is pretty good at not using up money mostly because no one can agree what to use it for. And it gets moved to the next budget.
The question is how much of our budget in % should this issue used on? 1% 0.5%?
That's already a billion or around 500 million a year if it was only the unused fund for innovation.
Then you can definitely make a calculus of if it's cheaper to pay another country or process them in the EU. If you can avoid one migrant that's 1 migrant.
How about paying for foreign nation building like local knowhow for construction and maintenance, for trades like plumbing or electrician or so. That would cost so much less in their local economy as well. These people live on less than 1 dollar a day paying someone to train them in a trade probably is 5k a year, at some point the local economy will support them, now paying for people to be trained can have knock on effects.
If they learn another language and do well on training they can actually just apply for a blue card in the EU so they can fill a spot on the list of currently sought after skilled workers.
It's a bit tricky since we are currently seeking a lot of people for solar and wind installation and just cheap IT personell for government.
It'd actually make sense to invest into using these countries as an external contractor for cheap skilled labor. We did that with Ukraine before they got attacked.
This investment only works if there's rule of law and peace...
Anyways long ramble
Thank god Swedes are waking up!
@@francoispignon7459Reverse migration is one of the side-effects of colonization. It's actually an expensive policy that has lasting effects for centuries.
@@francoispignon7459if it is about colonialism, then let them go to china, they are the new colonisers. Or Russia even, they like to shout hail Russia and down with the west, let them try the Russian hospitality. Europe is full, we took more than our share.
There is one simple solution to migration that many westerners (by westerners I mean weak peoples like Germanics, French, Brits) are oblivious to. Simply don’t accept anyone except possibly a small number of valuable specialists/scientists and don’t spend money on foreigners that don’t respect your culture and values. The money would be better spent preparing us for the inevitable demographic collapse, and the solution to this collapse is not replacing us with foreigners. Westerners became so soft and weak I’m not even shocked that migrants are using this moment of weakness to use and conquer you.
Of course they can. All they have to do is enforce their control over their borders, you know, that thing that every sovereign country has the right to do.
You probably don't know the law at all. Immigrants have the right to be given Asylum, it's a human right essential to Enlightment.
But then they wouldn't be able to cry about immigrants while benefiting from the cheap labour.
What i don’t understand in all this, what is EU’s policy on return of aslyum seekers? Because asylum means you are granted temporary stay until things calm down in your own country. Surely that means they will have to return at some point?
Чи не час українським біженцям повертатися?
@@amparogonzalezalvarez2295yea
In Russia, if you are stopped by a police officer and you are in the country illegally, you are gone immediately. I knew a Philippino lady who was stopped, found to be living illegally, and taken to jail for a deportation hearing.
That's, because Russia is a properly working country and not the free for all the EU has become.
@@AndreAndre-yd5gwHAHAHA, "properly working"
Yeah, not anymore. Abubandits are now part of this country, sadly@@radioreactivity3561
@@radioreactivity3561most nations have it except EU lol. But EU showing the world how to make your country more dangerous 😂😂😂. Quickly visit europe before they becomes a shit hole
The real problem with immigration to the EU is in a big part because we've got 27 EU countries all pulling in different directions with different policies.
If anywhere needs a clear EU mandate, this is it, basically, because EU countries have open boarders among themselves, it makes a lot more sense for the EU to have control over immigration, that would help to solve part of the problem where too many immigrants end up in too few countries like Italy, which is causing a problem, it would also be a more beefy policy in controlling who can come in if done at an EU level, because at the end of the day, the division is what is creating this mess, which just weakens us all in the EU.
In any case, it's crazy that we've got a union with freedom of movement in the union and yet we don't have a strong EU policy for controlling the boarders and immigration, which for the most part is left to the members in the EU, clearly, some major reforms are needed in that area, patch up jobs can work in the short term but it's not solving the underline issue and I feel there's only two ways to solve that, either we give the EU the powers to enforce these rules or EU members start putting boarders up, the second option is highly unlikely to happen, so lets see how long it takes before reality bites and we are willing to give the EU the powers to take control of this mess.
These migrants come here for social benefits. If there are countris with benefits and countries without, there is only 1 way for them. I wonder what exactly is EU expecting from let's say Slovakia to do with the migrant? Detain them? Because otherwise they will just leave and go to the place they want.
Why can't we have a freedom of movement (this has nothing to do with the EU, this is the Schengen treaty or zone - perhaps you meant that citizens of EU countries can work in another EU country without the necessity of the issue of a visa from that country) without having a common immigration policy? I did not quite understand this.
@@tomorrowneverdies567 What I mean is if they want to go to Germany, how to you keep them in let's say Poland? Detain them?
@@felo7474 but why even keep them in Poland?
If a person is recognized as a refugee in Poland, they can stayin Poland. But they cannot stay in Germany. Unless they are also recognized as a refugee in Germany as well.
If a person is an illegal immigrant in Poland, they must be deported (back to their country of origin).
If a person is a legal immigrant in Poland (obviously a person outside the EU), then they cannot work in Germany. Unless they obtain a work permit in Germany (visa) from Germany.
@@tomorrowneverdies567 well that's the thing! EU wants to "relocate" them within all Eu countries and how are they gonna enforce it? How are they gonna make them stay in that country?
Also refugees must only be taken in the "first safe country" no in a country on the other side of the world that they so happen to appear in somehow...
That's why this relocation is ridiculous IMO.
my city in the Netherlands has literally became a 3rd world city at this point, Im already old and do not fear anything at this point but do hope my childeren can create a safe nation once more
Things are amazing and getting way better!
dont vote leftists, greens and welcomers of migrants. Vote Nationalists and conservatives or anybody with common sense and survival instinct
The euphemisms used to obscure the fact that this is an invasion by fighting age men are staggering.
💃🕺
So if someone enter the EU with intention to go the Germany let's say. Are we suppose to keep him in a jail in any other country to prevent him from going to Germany?
The crisis will never end as long as the migrants are being "rescued" on a sea and delivered onto EU land. What they should do is take the migrants, let them go in the closest African country where they launched their boat, sink said boat and wave them goodbye.
They wioll just come again.
So send them back again, that's what border guards are for@@tomorrowneverdies567
they should just not let any illegal immigrant etc in im sorry but that is the reason for all the unsafety , unemployment etc we are seeing in western europe that you dont even seem to hear about in eastern europe its just a joke what the EU doing since 2015
The problem is Germany wants them and it’s government is facilitating the trafficking by funding NGOs which work with traffickers.
@@patrickmccutcheon9361 Stop spreading obvious bs. Germany feels a moral obligation to not let immigrants drown and lets NGOs act freely. But it's not like we yearn for immigrants. Foreigners might get that impression when they read German news (if they even do that) because most journalists in Germany are very left leaning and live in a dream world. They don't speak for the majority and they also don't speak for the government because our press is quite free. In reality it comes down to what most Germans and our government think is right: TO NOT LET HUMANS DIE
What if certain EU countries wouldn’t create any incentives to come in the first place
People without a single ID document - no ID card, no birth certificate, or anything of this sort, should be refused entry regardless of circumstances. Period.
Great video, thanks for the explanation. I full agree with the conclusion too
Thanks for watching!
EU must grow some balls and send the immigrants back to the countries that help their way into the EU, this would make those countries think twice before threatening the EU with pushing immigrants to them and demand money not to do so... At the same time EU should legally nationalize those immigrants who really want to come to EU and be a fanctional part of EU society, as long as this doesnt go uncontrolled and hurt a country...
Simplest solution is to not allow the boats to enter. Simplest solution is always the best. "No no no, its much more complex than that!"
I love how the video shows Lampedusa close to Italy when it is actually closer to Tunisia in Africa, omitted in the picture
Great summary of a very complex topic!
Why return them to country of origin? Just return them to the last African country they departed from (Tunisia or whatever). If Tunisia doesn't want them, send them there with warships, then Tunisia will change their mind. I hate Orban, but the guy is right, we are in midst of an invasion.
Tunisia returned them to Libya (where they came from) and the western media didn't shut up about it and Tunisians were attacked and westerners were calling for boycotting the country. If they let them pass, Tunisia is attacked, if they stop them at the border, Tunisia is also attacked.
@@Am_L1 I'm sorry western media are often braindead.
Good for Tunisia for sending them back.
But if they try to weaponise migrants against Europe we should have a right to defend ourselves.
For what?We need them!
@@brunoheggli2888 sure,they are invaluable. How would we organise riots in Paris or Berlin without them?
@@liva236muzikamaking a big thing about nothing!
Wait!?? We have to pay a fine now for not taking refugees??? WTF???
0:31 WTF IS AN IRREGULAR IMMIGRANT XDD IS IT THAT HARD TO CALL THEM ILLEGAL?
This is terrible! All of them should be returned back.
Great Video🙌!
I hope they stop them. Otherwise we are doomed...
stop being a drama queen, its a problem but Europe will be fine. People have migrated in and out of it for millennia
True. Europe is in real trouble due to mass illegal immigration. Ireland is in deep trouble due to migration too. Place has been altered massively for the worse.
Great video!!!! So much is covered. I think it would take me 2 hours of research to learn about this stuff. Looking forward to the next one :))
Glad you enjoyed it!
And it was all lies :))
@@EUMadeSimplesend them to Greenland🎉
EU should not allow anyone in
and deport anyone who doesnt fit in with the European values
100 %. This is OUR land.
What part of illegal immigration to EU countries is “irregular”.
Just sink the damn boats.
You have our fighter jets. SE
This will be Italy’s downfall. The EU and United Nations are thrilled the problem is solved.
The bureaucracy is too slow
there is already too many of them in West Europe and no politician ever have the balls to deport them it's just over
Before the 2011 Libyan war, immigration was not a big problem. Europe caused that war
Well... In a wide perspective for Europe, you can't colonize the world and expect them to live and die in the poverty you caused, right?
I am usually pro EU, but if Germany and Brussels keep trying to force laws on us, keep forcing to control our borders, keep forcing whatever they feel like onto us as they try now, I will honestly vote for RoExit, I will not allow the dissolution of my country in order to be ruled by Germany and Belgium
if we cant protect the EU external borders then Schengen will die. If member states refuse to help frontline countries like Italy and Greece the union will suffer. In a union you have to share benefits and costs together
The way to help is not by allowing more illegal immigration, it's by stopping them. We should all help Italy in STOPPING THE BOATS, not in getting more in Europe. @@ebbeb9827
I swear germany will become anti migrants, AFD (far right - anti migrant) is the second biggest party in germany now, i struggle seeing germsny staying migrant loving
@@ebbeb9827First get illegal migration under control, then ask to redistribute the migrants
You do realize that without the EU, the country wouldn't be where it is today right? You know, Romania, is the country with the highest immigration in Europe right? It's like being persuaded to vote against your own interests. Where did I hear that happening before, hmm? Is it maybe that island on the west coast of Europe that did the same and is regretting it in the present? It so happens that the same island that voted to leave the EU actually has more migrants entering the country than before leaving the EU.
My point. Please do your research and don't let politicians or Russian sponsored media persuade you to vote against your own interests.
Gosh, the issue that pushed the UK to leave the EU is suddenly getting attention as more and more members feel the strain. Something something after the horse has bolted...
The EU should fight against Migration, not Promote it!
stop lying, the EU does not promote illegal immigration
"Legally.... we are rAPed" my sides, I spat my coffee lmao
He should just have said we are forced. Veeeeeery poor choice of words😂😂
Orban es un mandao...
No relocation! What right does Germany have to tell the Central Europeans who must live in their communities?
Not sure why you point at Germany. It is an EU plan applicable to all states
@@EUMadeSimple Because not all EU states are truly equal in the EU. It's a political union which has only worked to undermine the sovereignty of former Communist nations.
@@EUMadeSimple Germany was the biggest advocate of letting them come. Why would other countries suffer the damage caused by Germany?
01:53 we all know they don’t look like that 😆
Cool video. Can you make one in cooperation with Kurzgesagt about Volt Party.
Anyone not making an application before travel, destroys their documents, travels across safe nations or enters illegally should be automatically denied. The UK Rwanda plan is a good idea that all irregular entrants be transferred to a safe country for processing. It acts as a disincentive to economic migrants. The EU should also consider a similar plan for war refugees, so they can he housed in countries with unused land that would welcome the financial support and influx of people where they do not wish to return following the war. There is no need to integrate and services can be aimed at people of similar cultures.
We should have stronger control rules like the U.S. has, and maintain the culture of Europe you can't let everything in without rules.🇪🇺
Have you been watching any news from the Mexican borders of the US lately? Dude, get real.
This is great. Under the 2022 voluntary solidarity mechanism, less than 1,000 refugees were relocated over the course of the year from mid-2022 to mid-2023. With the involuntary solidarity mechanism, not only would everything be more streamlined, efficient, and effective, but despite the "involuntary" part, countries wouldn't even need to take in a single refugee if they don't want to! They could instead provide financial support to the inundated frontline states. It's just that now they cannot shirk any responsibility, which was unsustainable from the perspective of the frontline states. Let's take a look at Hungary. Even if the EU did assign 30,000 to relocate in a year, Hungary only makes up 2% of the EU population and 3% of the non-frontline state EU population. That means taking in 900 people per year OR paying 18 million euros. Considering the EU funds are in the realm of billions annually, it's a small price to pay.
720p only?
I know. I only realized after I uploaded it. Sorry about that and other videos should be okay
I think all coutries ries have had enough
When all the EU countries will take equal care of the actual EU borders and the rich western counties will start actually acting instead of supporting human trafficing, and puting themselves in morally supirior position of being "open and tolerant" while they just enjoy their western position being surrounded by allied countries.
Unfortunatelly looking at the state of the western society and their need to show moral superiority plus they need cheap, uneducated labor to support their economy any solution is not likely.
Plus still many nothern and western counteris' societies are very closed and hermetic which only will increase the creations of ghettos and lack of integration. Sweden is the best example and this trend is likely to continue
That's not quite fair, a big complaint in that eastern EU members are not taking enough in, apart from with everything that's going on with Ukraine.
Besides, the western EU countries have more reason to be concerned because most migrants if given a choice would pick western countries over eastern countries, the irony is in all that, eastern countries need more migrants because of the declining population.
Besides, let's be honest, the real problem isn't that, the problem is that we've got a union of open boarders and yet we have different policies on immigrations over 27 countries, it's easy to see how that can be a mess, and I only see two solutions to that problem, either the EU is given more powers to deal with these things, or EU members close their boarders on each other.
Either way, it seems crazy to have open boarders in the EU, only then to have each EU member having its own policy for outside countries, it just creates a mess that we keep seeing.
@@paul1979uk2000 Basically every country in the EU needs migrants. Problem is we need LEGAL migrants that start their journey to the EU in an embassy of a momber state and not on a sea or in a forest.
You know that allowing ILLEGAL migrants in, only makes the legal migrants less likely to be allowed in because there is no space for them? How is that any fair to the people who actually want to come legally?
All countries should be allowed to choose who they let in or not.
Piss off ex soviet states already experience that during soviet time. Now we large Russian minorities that don’t want to be part off the state and culture. So no we don’t need them here to turn countries upside down even. We see it’s destroying our heritage and country from with in. So piss off !
Best they all come too the UK! No chance of being turned down or deported because the system has failed and the government is incompetent!
This is fixing a sticky door frame on the Titanic.... more people want to live in Europe than Europe can support and the existing laws regarding refugees and asylum seekers are not fit for purpose.
Every person let in encourages 10 more back home.
The EU laws are ridiculous and support illegal immigration. I moved to Sweden in legal ways. Have been working here for the last 6 years. I'm also highly educated. Still cannot get a permanent residency bec the government gives a hard time to the people seeking an honest way of living. On the other hand people arrive here, they destroy their id cards, give no info about their identity. Then they get all the benefits of asylum seeking. They get free education, are given jobs and get permanent residency in 3 years. Hard to understand.
"Process & Relocate" "Finger prints" "Applications" ? Is there something like BORDER PROTECTION ?
We should have a proper solution for this, the whole situation will get worse over time 😒
No thing gettimg better over time!
Also I want to add, it's just 140 years, that a million of our countrymen migrated to the US. The railway here is still named "Amerika line"
They migrated legally and were supported by US laws.
@@jboss1073 Define legality with autochthonous people of the American continent actually having no say in your laws. Please make a logical claim without using 20th century human civilization rankings and white superiority, thanks!
@@minzblatt Sure. Europeans won territorial wars against the Siberian-descendants and Siberian-speakers who were then living in America. This is Natural Law understood by all peoples in the world. Whoever wins a battle keeps the land.
I think what we have learned from Finland vs Sweden and Germany, we really have to spread migrants out among town and neighbourhoods. It gives the biggest incentive to integrate and get work if anything, due to lack of human contact.
It's very clear that after the last migrant crisis, most left leaning voters have gone hard right just to deal with this issue.
I've walked through heavy Agerian neighbourhoods in France and similar housing situations in Albania, where you would not see a woman at all, not to mention without an escort, while the men do what they want. Which absolutely is not in line with European freedoms. Sweeden is having a very similar hard time because they housed so many altogether and that just furthers clan mentality and therefore the disdain for Arab and Subsarharan Africans among locals.
In school we had members of the traveling community in our class and the teacher frequently mixed us up because of this (and this only happened in classes with multiple travelers).
If this was common sense for primary school teachers, surely our member states can figure out something similar.
That is straight up bs. Most left leaning people have not shifted to the far right. Besides that, those people live segregated because we keep failing to address the root-issues: systemic racism and capitalism (the exploitation of the poor world). Look at what France is doing in Africa, then look at how corrupt the Western corporations are and how they steal resources literally everywhere on this planet. Also, systemtic racism comes from the lack of education and exposure to the outside world. If kids grow up in racist households they will grow up with racist ideas and so the cycle will only continue. But this topic is much more complex than this and I’d have to get into other topics too, such as misinformation, discrimination on all grounds, the way our communities work, etc.
It is not about spreading them out, it is a question of controlling the influx. Why does the EU accept any and all who arrive on their shores? It does not even manage to deport those refused asylum including those illegals who they allow get their hands on weapons and kill football supporters as in Brussels the other day.
Spreading them out is nonsense. No people has any right to settle the lands of another people. We have fought countless wars for our homes, why should we surrender our land to people unwilling to fight for their own?
Yeah and Denmark too, with their strategy of demolishing ghettos and spreading out population to ease integration.
How to spread it out though? You cant simply force people to live where you want them to live. Besides, people start moving out after a certain degree of MENA neighbours. The problem is numbers, not the lack of stalinistic meassures in moving people against their will.
Does anyone remember Germany's Angela Merkel "Wir Schaffen das!" ? The perfect remedy for self made problems, Germany! Why ME paying ?!
This fixation on ''human rights'' is absurd, it is nobody's right to colonize another country.
It's simple. If you don't want immigration, then next year vote for parties to represent you.
no party represents the anti-immigration crowd. Meloni said she did, but she came to power and the situation is worse than ever before
They need to take the boats back to Africa and if the boats sinks, then take them onboard and sail them back and drop them off in shallow water
A Turkish student or businessman must prep dozens of documents, pay €75 and wait for months to get visa to attend a business fair or a university in EU, while all it takes is illegally crossing borders for an African migrant. Then, the illegal guy gets residency, pocket money, rent support, free language and integration classes.
It is legal for asylum seekers to enter a country whichever way they can provided that they contact the authorities to seek asylum at their earliest opportunity. Only their most basic needs will be met in terms of accommodation, food, healthcare, etc, until their asylum application has been processed, at which point they are either repatriated to their country of origin if they are unsuccesful, or they get granted protection in which case they are eligible for the same rights and benefits as other normal residents. We expect the Turkish businessman or student to apply for their visa in advance because it is safe for them to do so, whereas asylum seekers who are fleeing for their lives don't have that option.
@@MaxVliet It is true that it is legal for them to cross illegally as long as they approach the authorities to claim refugee and the given support by German state covers their basic needs only. However, it is a contradiction to offer right to seek refuge to someone who illegally crosses. I gain a legal leeway by being an illegal. A more sound way is processing these applications abroad or accepting refugee applications only for those come legally via visa.
Secondly, most don't come to save their lives; they come to improve their lives. I can empathise with seeking for better opportunities but EU countries are not charity nations. If they want to come to access better life standards, they must do it via applying a job visa, which require qualifications. If they don't, then sorry.
@@mocha_bear00 Asylum seekers are not illegals. Irregular border crossings are not illegal for asylum seekers, thus they did not cross the border illegally. The majority of asylum applications are approved because the majority of asylum seekers are genuinely fleeing violence and persecution. People generally don't risk their lives to such a degree over a better paying job.
Roughly 45% are granted protection at the initial stage, with a further 20% being granted protection on appeal after being initially denied. This means over 65% of asylum seekers are given the right to stay overall, so your claim that most of them are coming for higher living standards is false.
Do a significant proportion of asylum seekers come for a better life? Sure, though they will not be granted asylum unless they can prove that their lives would be in danger if they were to be sent back.
While we're talking about economic migrants it is worth keeping in mind that the economic inequality that drives this is caused by the continued exploitation of people and natural resources in the global south by nations and corporations in the global north. We owe our high living standards in no small part to this exploitation because it allows us to buy consumer goods that we could not afford if we had to pay a fair price for the raw materials and manual labor needed to extract them. As long as we keep exploiting them, they are going to keep coming. You should look up the concept of unequal exchange to get a better understanding of why we have this influx of economic migrants because it is important to understand why it is happening before we can do anything meaningful to address it.
What is irregular immigrant? Someone who immigrates only once? Are there regular immigrants?
I will vote for the far right parties regardless of their view of the EU, the mass migration is a problem that is not going to be solved by the current establishment. They keep giving money and trade with countries that do not care about reinforcing border rules while European population is getting replaced by cheap labor or future social cases.
Good. The EU will be Blacker and Browner and you can't do anything about it.
@@jasonhaven7170oh we will definitely do something about it you can trust me on that.
@@jasonhaven7170ver heard of the reconquista? Simple as that. Europeans are waking up.
Lol no they're not. They're voting for conservative parties that lead to more immigration. Y'all just d*mb.@@goncalodias6402
@@jasonhaven7170 and also poorer, more dangerous, and shittier.
Deals with third countries 5:49 is the best and most sustainable solution to mass refugee influx. If those countries had stable governing structures and some form of a decent economy, most people would not risk their lives to migrate to Europe at the first place.
However, deals shouldn't be done by one side throwing money at the other and hoping the other side will respect its agreements. The EU should personally involve itself in helping the other country of the contract prevent the refugees from entering, travelling freely and avoiding law-enforcement. Otherwise, you can consider the money lost without achieving anything the moment the deal is signed.
@@danielhalachev4714He seems to be talking about 🐂... unfortunate.
They are destroying Italy . Italians what their culture back and their religions respected . Italians need help instead those entering recieve all the help
Migrants from certain countries have worn out their welcome
Or just put a fleet in the med.......
Too expensive (you will become poor), I believe very low efficiency, and I can easily find a better solution: embargo all countries that refuse to accept citizens of theirs who they were illegal immigrants. Then you must solve legal immigration of people with too different phenotype too.
@@tomorrowneverdies567 estimated total costs of immigration in the Netherlands is already 25 to 30 billion euro a year....
@@julian5345 I am not surprised. By the way, do you believe that election results in the Netherlands are legitimate (valid)? Because if they are, then how can it be explained, that so many people vote for these parties, which do not want to solve this problem?
I am greek by the way.
@@tomorrowneverdies567No
That way we create jobs
@@yanipro3978 creating jobs is not necessarily good, because for example, in order to do so, you may need to take money (taxes) from economically more competitive sectors, to give them to the people that will do the job that you are going to create.
This is what the socialist (or communist) regimes did to keep unemployment at near 0%.
Example: my country has 10% unemploment. To make unemployment 0%, I increase taxation, particularly of wealthier people, and with this money I create jobs (that are not needed). Problem solved. 0% unemployment. My country's economic competitiveness was just murdered though, and there will be no economic growth because 60% of all incomes will be taken by the state. So people will have little incentive to invest.
Where do they play on deporting these people if they simply refuse to tell where they came from? Sounds like something they have no chance of actually executing.
Build blade fence along the border lol
Ok if Germany wants Idc
Take them all 😂
Deport them
I do not understand why do they take them in the first place
Wrong. Send them back
Just do the opposite of what germany thinks of doing and we should be good
5:00 Jabba the hutt
This kind of video needs chapters.
Will see how this will (not) work in reality.
They clearly don't want to deal seriously with that and becouse of ideological reasons I am going to vote the far right so maybe they'll realize that EU officials cannot disregard the will of an enormous percentage of the population of the EU to follow their own ideology.
meant to destabilize for a global takeover
The question is do they really want to 😏
I guess Ursula Von Der Leyen saying that she give Israel her full support, didn’t help with the Tunisian case huh. It’s almost like politicians forget that they are doing politics sometimes. The EU had more to be gained from being a voice of reason and appeasement. But hey let’s anger all our Arab neighbors that we really need in our migration policies.
Yeah that was stupid of her, Islamic terrorists and sionists fascists are both slaughtering civilians, EU should not support either side, only send humanitarian aid.
But EU shouldn't rely on it's Islamic neighbours but be able to protect our borders on our own.
First get rid of the stupid law thay if people are "stranded on the sea" we have to "save them".
They're trying to illegally cross borders, if they drown, it's their fault.
People should know that there are consequences to their actions.
It's not just that. Tunisian president already showed his disregard for the agreement, because he thought the amount the Euros wanted to pay was looking like alms. Turkiye as well, wont be part of another round of the agreement unless you give those bordering countries more privileges.
last time i was this early..... i wasn't
The video commentary was delivered at such bewildering speed that the claim "made simple" is farcical.
Please make a video or more in cooperation with Kurzkuzart.
We must help our brothers from Italy, only solidarity and optimal strategy can resolve this continental crisis. Pozdrawiam z Polski.
I got a better screening system: white in, blacks and Muslims out.
Also naval blockade. I guarantee that after the 5th ship is sunk there won’t be anymore coming.
Please don't let us in.
You are already brain draining these places dry anyways. If we come in we are in a couple of decades expected to take care how many old people (average Age of a native European is steadfastly raising higher).
Let the whites from Romania and Eastern Europe instead. Oh wait my bad, there is also a demographic decline in Eastern Europe. Maybe let the middle easterners in 🤣, they have plenty of kids after all and will be able to provide and they are white (I guess depends on how much you care). Oh wait nevermind most of them are muslim.
Goodluck I guess you could go for Central asians I guess.
We should welcome more people, with legal channels. And imprison all the ones coming from illegal channels
Come illegally, throw away your passport, say you're from a war torn country, get asylum. House, food, clothes, phone - paid for
I don't care about the human rights of criminals.
SIMPLY RIDICULOUS! Millions of potential Italian citizens, that have their rights denied, just because their ascendency is matrilinear, while millions of foreigners receive ample help from the Italian Republic! Eenough is enough!!
Not "possibly", but very likely.
in my opinion, it is the first step in the right direction. It needs to be implemented in the EU and Germany needs to do the homework and not point fingers at others. well explained.
How are Hungary and Poland still in the eu
no country should be force to have them either keep them or send them away