2019 Chevrolet Colorado vs. Ford Ranger Comparison
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ส.ค. 2019
- Today, it’s time for another Ford vs. Chevy shootout, but rather than comparing half-ton pickups we’re looking at each brand’s midsize offering, comparably equipped versions of the 2019 Ford Ranger FX4 and 2019 Chevrolet Colorado Z71. We’ll take a look at the specs of both and then put them through some real-world tests to see what kind of fuel economy they get in our mileage test, how well they ride in our stability test, and what kind of acceleration they have both loaded and unloaded in our 0-60 test.
Read more at: www.autoguide.com/car-compari...
Get a free price quote: quotes.autoguide.com/
#FordRanger #ChevroletColorado #ComparisonAG
Please show your support and subscribe!
th-cam.com/users/subscription_c...
AutoGuide reviews the latest new cars with test drives, car comparisons and shootouts plus coverage of breaking auto industry news, auto shows, rumors, top 10 lists, and spy photos. Help shop for your new car with informative car buying tips and car recall news, and be entertained with feature stories, Top 10s and car review videos. - ยานยนต์และพาหนะ
The sarcastic "plug" for Sysco at the end was HILARIOUS!
And as a Sysco driver, what he said was all true. Whatever you need, wherever it goes, we get it done. No driveway, No problem. Lol
I really enjoyed you guys displaying the origin of the parts... I found it very interesting and hope you keep doing this. 👍
I have a 2019 Colorado and love it. Never had a problem with the brake pedal, great acceleration, handling, stopping.
agreed, do you have the variable v6? very rarely do I see it in 4 cylinder mode
Not mentioned: the Ranger's rear seat back folds down in a single piece, and doesn't fold flat. So no passengers if you need to fold it. The Colorado's is a 60-40 split, so you can carry cargo and passengers at the same time.
That’s what a truck bed is for
But the Colorado is shit with shit parts
@@TheOne_p shut up
@@TheOne_p 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@TheOne_p you must think never had one because they are good trucks
Amazes me how big these "Small" Trucks really are. The original Mini's were just that. MINI. Meant to be 3rd Vehicles for those who didn't need a Full size and priced accordingly. Damn shame there is nothing offered anymore.
True. But have you noticed how the midsized trucks are getting much bigger as well? They are trying to keep it to scale
The reason is do to the tec and safety that's stuffed under the fenders panels and dash to bad they didn't offer a single cab Colorado like the s10 version or the luv
@@mr.merica6048 I agree. I would like a single cab with 8 foot bed.
Smart fortwo
100% agree!
I don't understand why automakers do not make column mounted shifters on smaller cars and trucks to make more space in front anymore.
My 83 Malibu was a column shift and it had a massive front seat with the extra room.
Ben Covington
Didn’t know the Malibu ever had a column shifter. All I remember was the recent 2012 one was the last with it. Too bad Impala removed the option!
Ben Covington
That must be nice 👍🏻
It’s the primary reason I can’t fit in most cars anymore. At 6’3” my right knee is in agony, especially in the Colorado.
BigBossIvan
Do you think front bench seats will return? I remember my dad had a 04 Escape and I got to drive it too. It had a column shifter and open room for the knees. Got rid of it because of rust and my mom complaining. I wish we still had it. Now we have a new Escape. I like the first gen one better because of the column shifter.
I work at a Ford dealership and have driven many Rangers, and I just bought a new Colorado Z71 last fall. This comparison is pretty much spot on with what I think of them. The Ranger seats are way more comfortable, I like the torque from the EcoBoost and its nicely mated to the 10-speed, the SYNC 3 system is great to use, but man the ride/handling on that thing is so bad, it kind of reminds me of my bro's old Cutlass Ciera (which I hated). The Colorado rides/handles great for a truck, feels nimble and planted, I strongly prefer the interior layout, I kind of like the styling better, and honestly I do like the V6, I think it'll age better than the turbocharged EcoBoost. Glad I went with the Chevy overall. Also I took that ridiculous air dam off and installed some proper skid plates underneath the front, I'm consistently averaging 25-26 mpg driving mostly on 40-50 mph backroads.
Glad to hear your real-world experience matches up with mine! Despite being a few years older, the Colorado feels like a better truck.
- Craig
My Colorado also gets better gas mileage than the Ford around 23 average. I have the LT with the air dam which is cool with me. Just a city truck anyways. What you said is spot on.
@@AutoGuide love your videos keep it up!
Nah the ride thing here way overstated I think the Ranger is just so good overall ya gotta try find a major fault. Not happening fellas! Its leaps & bounds better than rest. Oh an minor reflash bring up MPGs a bit. I'm very happy with my '19 Ranger XLT FX4 crew..black on black ...& mean! Livernoismotorsports.com shipping me a tune w/80hp more. Try that in a taco or 'rado!
@@BrD4GOD the American midsize trucks are best an no surprise! The Colorado is a nice truck but next to this new Ranger its outclassed badly. I drove em all too & handling thing a few here saying way overstated. Ranger is phenom in its 1st yr! Wait till another 2! Till then loving my new black on black Ranger XLT FX4.
A $3000 price difference is pretty serious. Also, given your conclusion, it makes me curious how the little diesel in a Colorado would stack up in the same comparison.
Overall, I appreciate the balanced, fair review you gave. I'm interested in midsize trucks for my next ride, and reviews like these help give me insight to guide my purchase decision.
I have a 16' Colorado with about 51k on it same v6 engine. Life time fuel economy I have is 23.5 and that is prob a 60/40 highway to city driving.
Bought a 19 ranger xlt. Loving it so far! I loved that it came with a lot of standard safety features that the other mid size trucks charge extra for. And the 2.3 EcoBoost is awesome! It definitely does the job. Hopefully ford will somehow add the 2.7 EcoBoost down the road. It handles awesome too! Price wasn’t bad either. With rebates the dealer had it at $25,101. But my payoff is only more cause I owed money on my trade😅🤷♂️.
Lol same with me got me down to 28 grand my ranger is a 2wd
I want a 2020 one but idk if i shiuld chose a colorado or the ranger haha
@@mvally2714 I would just wait for the 2023 ranger honestly.
I’m looking to get a Ranger. How is your truck holding up?
@@patrickreynolds6861 I traded it in at 53,000 miles. It was a good truck! No issues when I had it. My only complaint is there are full size trucks that get better mpg and fuel range. The 18 gallon tank is too small. Traded it in for a 22 pathfinder
At 8 minutes in I could tell by your voice you we going to pick Colorado.
I could tell that by the first 30 seconds.
Test drove them both, purchased the Ranger because I generally buy Ford, well, 3,000mi later I'm disappointed ! Truck is getting 17mpg out of a 4-cylinder !!! In dash screen is 1/2 the size of the Canyon's and smaller than my cell phones. Did anyone mention changing oil ? You have to take it to the ford dealership EVERY time because they have to take 1/2 the fender off to remove the filter !!! Great engineering there !
@@daghostxxx1797 sold my ranger for a 2021 ram 1500 with the 5.7 hemi, since they get the same gas mileage somehow...
@@Xcarson123 it's because of the turbos on the ranger.
@@interceptingfist5682 agreed
I kind of question the fuel economy test. I get 20.x city and high 20’s on the highway. Is my FX4 Lariat a ringer?
As an employee at the Wentzville plant thank you for choosing our Colorado.
Also just chose a Z71 Trail Runner Edition from your plant. Love it so far.
The manual transmission on the Colorado solid bro?
@@netwak how much did you pay for it?
Since you work at the Wentzville plant, should I get the updated 2021 version or wait until the 2022 for a possible redesigned model?
@@ChrisBanks211 I'd rather not post in the comments, ha, ha. you can msg me?
Nobody noticed the iPhone he was trying to wirelessly charge didn’t support wireless charging???😂
You need to plug in to use Android Auto--not sure about Carplay. So what's the point of wireless?
@@karykrismer1448 Its just handy to charge your phone or a passengers. Most people dont use android auto or apple auto all the time so plugging in just to charge is an inconvenience compared to the wireless base. It's nice to have wireless charging but they should have made sure the popular phones were able to fit.
That must be quite an old phone unless Apple was that behind on wireless charging tech.
@@Wallriss Except that a passenger can use their phone while it's charging if using a cable, and it will charge much faster (assuming a Snapdragon Quickcharge system--which annoyingly the Chevy plug-ins are not! Not sure any Android Auto are.)
@@Wallriss I no longer follow iPhones, and never followed Wireless charging, but Apple has not been a leader in providing features since before the Samsung Galaxy S4. LTE, Bluetooth, NFC and even something as simple as larger screens they were well behind the pack (and in the case of Bluetooth and NFC crippled the technology to some extent).
I truly enjoyed your testing and review. Thanks
Well done. Really enjoyed the down to earth details and experience!
I have the 2021 Ranger and i can say without doubt, I prefer it over the Chevy. At 70 MPH I average 22 MPG both on the panel and hand checked. At 2K miles now, I am getting up to 24 in town. I do agree with your assessment of the Climate controls being small, but those controls are not primary, primary controls are on the screen. The wife commented how smooth the truck was and not bouncy. My F250 was bouncy without a load. The seats are much more comfortable than the Chevy. I also agree with the brakes sponginess, took me awhile to get used to it. I would have gone with the Chevy, but i have more respect for myself than that. I think at the end of the day , it all boils down to if you want a truck to carry stuff like tools and small farm equipment in the ford or you want to carry Flower bouquets in the back of the chevy.
Owned my Colorado since 2015.
Has 96k on it. Only had 1 sensor go bad. Chevy fixed it free. Runs like a top, and has gotten me out of crappy situations.My first new vehicle and I love it today like the first time I drove it. My little daughters love it. They call it "daddy's truck" :) my 6 year old already asked me if she can have it for her first vehicle lol.
Loyal Chevy fanboy for sure.
Old Chevy, s never die
All good till the frame rots out!
@@timcheek5134 hopefully not. But I've been working in fabrication for 10+ years. If so hopefully I can address it on the cheap.
150k miles now.
I am not in the market for either but this was a very thorough and enjoyable review!
I wanted to know if the Ranger had an awd option like the chev. Can it turn on pavement in 4 hi without binding. The Tacoma cant but the Chev can?
As far as I know they don't have an awd system. However, I have a '07 f150 4x4 with limited slip rearend and it will bind while trying to turn in 4wd so I know what you are talking about. I also have a '19 F250 4x4 and it doesn't seem to do it as much if at all. The difference is the newer truck has an electronic locker so under normal 4wd the rear is still an open differential. It only locks the rear when you engage it. I believe you will still have some binding from front to rear but its reduced because of that. Also another difference is if its slick out my F150 will slide the rear out on you even in 4wd because the rear locks up easy. I don't let my wife drive the truck because of this. However, with the selectable locker on the f250 and it being an open diff it will spin one of the tires but is less likely for the rear end to slide out to the side. The rangers are an open diff on base models and offer electronic rear locker. Safer option in my opinion.
I have gotten an average of 23.7 mpg over the last over 8,000 miles in my Colorado Z71! With the air dam removed and OEM ZR2 style skids installed. Not bad!
Wow, what a thorough review.
Good job mate loved your review. ...👍
Thanks for watching!
- Craig
I have a 2014 Ranger Wildtrack 4x4 here in Thailand and love it. It rides well, drives well, and runs very well. No complaints what so ever with the 3.2 L diesel.
I really enjoy his reviews
Went with the Chevy Z71. Very pleased with the look and performance.
I did too. And through on a Mallet stage 2 supercharger. Absolutely worth it. No way I'm paying $45k for a 4 cylinder even if it has a turbo.
@@wilsterone6689 I personally don't care. I won't use too much power. Worst thing I'll use my truck for is towing my travel trailer around but it's pretty lite so it won't take that much power. I also wanna offroad and 4 cylinders are better for offroading and gas mileage
Well done..better review than many So called Truck guys...keep up the good work.
So where’d you get all those ford flathead engine blocks (59ab & 8ba) you used for ballast? I could use an uncracked 8ba for my ‘51 ford f1 for a spare.
I have a GMC 2011Serria crew cab 5.3. My friend gets a new F-150 4 door every year. The 4.6 , 5.0 the 5.4 the 3.5 V6 the 2.7 V6 and the 3.7 V6. We go bass fishing in Canada every year. We have the same size bass boats mostly the same gear. So we're pulling about the same weight. We fill up before we leave and fill up before we reach the border. Every truck he gets say's the gas mileage should be better than mine. And every year he puts 3 to 5 gals more in than me. Ford has been overestimating their MPG for years!
I drove a Ranger, power but handles like a cement truck and sounds like your in a wind tunnel on the highway. I bought a Colorado and love it.
No reliability issues on the chevy?
@@cammac66 I have had extensive experience with both and the Colorado was far superior for reliability. The Rangers were constantly blowing their engines and gearboxes while the Colorados have been nothing short of reliable. I totalled the first one I had after 110k miles and now onto 150k miles in my second and haven't had an issue.
If you say Colorado is better I m getting one then . next year .
@@careywurdinger5238 you won't regret it, best mid size ute on the market IMO. The only thing holding it back is how ruthless GM can be to deal with
Well I grew up on Chevy my dad always drove a Chevy but I hear Ford pickup are not all great . I m with Chevy cause I can count on it and their better.
Craig...YOU.are HILARIOUS...! Loved this comparison! 🙃😃👣😁
Very good comparison , thank you.
I like both , but i prefer the Colorado with the D-Max . It gets awesome mileage and is great on trails !
I have a 2019 Chevy Colorado, and I’m in love with my truck! I got the base model so it’s nothing fancy, but even base model is pretty nice. My center console is huge! I have so much storage to put my wallet or phone anywhere. I would say the only thing that bugs me is the back seats. I feel like people don’t really enjoy being in the back, it’s small and looks uncomfortable. My truck didn’t come with a bed liner so I had to get one myself. I did get a base model so that’s my fault. But the engine is amazing!! It’s a v6 but feels like a v8 when I’m on the highway passing people. I would say overall I love my Colorado, and I wouldn’t trade it in for anything. Plus I got 7,000lbs of bitches I can haul😏
Goochrider oh ya man it’s much nicer! But my v6 has good pick up
Any random p0651 codes...
fishstick8888 not that I’m aware of
@@josephsicilia9013 i was getting random p0651 and going into limp mode. Truck would just shut off ... ended up being spark plug wires where arching against the block
fishstick8888 holy crap man hope everything goes well!
Great comparison well done....Sysco...lmao that was awesome and funny as hell,
It’s definitely odd when the Ranger is more expensive than the F150
especially when they are not.
Milky Sponge Cake. Like when the jeep pickup is more expensive then the full size Ram.
Milky SpongeCake cause ford don’t make the ranger
@@michaelrodriguez1567 Brand new ,I paid almost 40K for my F350XLT 1 ton dually, full crew cab (4dr) 8ft bed, auto 4spd overdrive, Diesal in 2004 ! (With a bunch of power options) LOL This is what happens when we let the pickup market become marketed to women and creature comforts. Also the federal govt mandated insane emissions equipment ! :) Now you cant even buy a stripped 1/2 ton for what my 1 ton dually costs with nearly 1000ft lbs tq and seating for 6!
highly inaccurate statement there
I have a 2019 Ranger and the only thing I agree with AutoGuide is the fuel economy. also disappointed that ford didn't gave us a manual transmission.
Me to
Just bought a 2019 Ford Ranger XLT Sport with Sync 3 technology. Did not purchase the FX4 off road package because the truck will not see any real off-road action, mostly hauling, towing and camping while still being my day to day city driving work truck. So far I love the turbo charged I4 engine very responsive and it has the start/stop technology which lends to decent city driving fuel economy. I'm a Ford guy but I did check out the Chevy Colorado and I just liked the Ranger in terms of looks, ride quality and the engine was a slam dunk for me. No doubt the Colorado is a nice mid-size truck but for me it's the Ford Ranger.
I prefer the looks and ride height of the Ranger too. I also like the turbo engine... if I need the extra power I will accept the poor fuel economy trade off. If I don't, I can stay out of the throttle and maybe do a little better than the epa numbers. I don't know what went on with this guy's fuel numbers... unless he was leaning on the thing way hard, there's no way it should have that high fuel consumption.
As ever, personal preferences make vehicle buying a hard choice... but I agree, for me it would be the Ranger supercab 4wd.
very good test,,, Thank You
This was brilliant test . Finaly its like how will the truck really work for me
Just bought a 2019 ranger, it comfortable, fast (for a 4 banger) and I love driving it. gas milage ain't great but it's not an issue for me. I would absolutely recommend this truck
Get the new Ford Performance tune, hugh gains.
This guy is a herb. He wouldn't buy these trucks, cause he's too busy putting around in his Toyota 86.
Not like these trucks are manly. They're luxury pieces of junk. Oh how the might have fallen.
Yes and I bet drive a Yugo. Review was well done. Take off the cowboy hat and just relax.
I bet people love how nice you are
Are you that low on Testosterone that you feel like you need a truck to feel “manly”?
I’m just saying, if I’m a mid-size truck buyer, this is not the guy I’m taking advice from on what truck to buy. Also, his postulation that he wouldn’t buy either is not useful for people in the market for a truck. They’re obviously machines that serve a specific purpose and if you have a need for that purpose you’ll probably buy one of them or a Tacoma. I’m guessing he doesn’t have a Tacoma either.
The Sysco commercial at the end was fantastic… I subscribed
Outstanding comparison!
I still go with the Colorado,more engine choices
You're ignorant
@@HaloDaycare why? Because he has a preference, that makes him ignorant for not agreeing with you?
I love the fucking turbo diesel in a compact truck
No, no, no. You don't go with the Colorado because of "more engine choices". You go for it because it has the best engine choice for you.
Although I do like the little cubby in the Colorado Cuz if you're going hunting it's a great place to put your bullets you can quickly grab your rifle and your ammo get out and go.
This truck review is better than the last truck review you did.
What midsized truck would you recommend
Colorado
With regards to driver assistance tech, the Colorado has a $690.00 safety package that includes forward collision, lane departure warning and rear park assist. This is available on the 4 x 4 LT models, but not with the Z71 trim.
Just wanted to point this out, I use that small cubby for a garage door opener
I use it too.
So cool the Colorado. Want one. ...ZR2.
John Grytbakk I have a 19. It’s a cool truck for sure
@@seadoo4life727 Lucky you. Have fun.
John Grytbakk thanks man. So far so good
These trucks are available in Australia but only in Deisel options, the Ranger has a 3.2l 5cyl option (not petrol versions available in AUS), and the models chosen on this are the "softer" models. My Ranger is 2019 XLT Supercab with suicide doors in the rear, all the lane monitoring systems and an Aluminium tray for $52k AUD, those ones you have covered are a mixed up batch of leftover parts from Australia!
Great video thanks.
Surprise surprise turbo engine is not the most tuel efficient, ppl gettting lied to
Actually, I was quite surprised by the Ranger's mileage. I figured it would do FAR BETTER because in our last truck-comparison test (here's a link in case you haven't seen it yet: th-cam.com/video/VhALwi9mOsQ/w-d-xo.html #ShamelessPlug, LOL) where we pitted the F-150 with the 2.7-liter twin-turbo V6 against a Silverado 1500, the Ford's fuel economy was quite good and right in line with what the onboard computer said the vehicle was delivering. Of course, towing a maxed-out trailer up a mountain might have been a different story. I think something was wrong with the gas pump or filler neck on the truck, which allowed it to take an extra half gallon of fuel. Something was up because the fuel-economy readout in the Ranger was nearly 20 percent off and I can't imagine they're THAT inaccurate. Anyway, thanks for watching and commenting!
- Craig
@@AutoGuide weren't there some whistle nlowersninside Ford talking about the rangers epa testing ?
Turbo engines are fuel efficient if you use cruise everywhere.
ze3bar problem is ppl like to feel the turbo kick in so they keep pushing on it therefore there goes the mpg
@@AutoGuide : I agree Craig, I think something went very wrong there. I've pedalled lots of turbo engines and I know that they do suck fuel badly when you lean on them... but your loop numbers were unusually high. The V6 Colorado could beat the turbo 4 on fuel economy under mid or high load circumstances, but the numbers should not have been that different for your "mixed use" test. Thanks.
The Colorado 2019 is the first truck I have owned, I love it, I got mine loaded with all the features I would ever need that weird compartment doesn't' have any use for me either...lol
I put my chap stick there.
is the Lariat the only 4x4 within the ranger trim levels?
Thank you for being honest man. Probably not a lot of car reviewers are gonna come out and say "these trucks suck" even though you sugar coated it under "I don't love these trucks" I respect it a lot.
I drove a Colorado about a year ago and was very impressed. I like to drive my trucks for a very long time and according to what I read, turbocharged engines tend to wear faster. So I would definitely go with a 6 cylinder naturally aspirated engine. On the flip side, the V6 Colorado is mated to the 8 speed that had issues. They say they “fixed” the problem by changing the fluid, but I need a better explanation than that. I haven’t been able to find info on 8 speed transmission issues on the 2020s so perhaps they have it under control. Perhaps the reason they haven’t announced a fix is because of the class action lawsuit. If they fixed it there must have been a problem... Wish they’d just sell it with the 6 speed. I hear the Chevys have a lot of electronics issues, but I can handle that. I just can’t purchase a vehicle if I have doubts about the transmission. Does anyone have info on the transmission issue? How about the 4 cylinder Colorado? It has the 6 speed.
Late but for anyone who sees this.
From what ive gathered online and asking a dealership, when the 8 speed was introduced for 2015, they used the wrong fluid from the factory. It absorbed moisture from the trans vent too fast and the change in viscosity caused issues. The TSB was to flush the fluid and replace it with a different one. They seem to have figured this out by 2017, as the complaints online fell off drastically, but the tsb still applies for all 2015+ years with the 8 speed. Ive read forums where people say you can walk into a gm dealer and say you have trans shudder (it has to be shudder cause thats what the tsb is for, not rough shifting) and theyll flush your trans no questions asked.
Did all this research before buying my 2019 colorado and havent had any trans issues yet at 42k miles.
The fix is confirmed in a TSB basically swaps the transmission fluid to a synthetic version. I've had it swapped no issues for the last 4 years.
Had a 2016 Camaro that had the torque converter shudder problem. They followed the TSB and triple flushed the system and installed the correct fluid and I never had any more problems. And that was with 91k miles. The only issue I had was that I had to pay 650 dollars to get it done, when it was their mistake from the factory. Why did I have to pay for their screw up?
@@danielsherrill7085 glad it worked out for you, and I hope GM is able too make it right for everyone. I went with the Tacoma. Nice truck, but pricy.
Full economy for mid sizes are about the same as the full sizes ? I’m confused
I've never understood this either
My Ranger gets 4mpg more than my brothers ecoboost F150. He drives like an old man and my truck is lifted with bigger tires and I spend way too much time in sport mode lol.
Great review!!
A bit late seeing this, but great review and comparison. Real world driving is more important than most of the off-road only comparison videos on you tube. Would love to hear your thoughts on a Tacoma TRD Off-Road.
7:45
My ‘01 Chevy S10 has the same problem with the gas and brake pedal spacing as the Colorado...
My 99 Tahoe has that set up too. Its fine for me, its really not that bad.
A four cylinder, automatic transmission equipped, pickup is garbage. What good are they besides for looks?
I'll keep my 99' reggie cab,long box 5spd manual,4x4 Ranger thank you very much.This is NOT a truck,it's a car in a trucks shell.
I rented a 2019 Colorado for a day and drove it 300 miles. My only complaint was that the screen would dim when I was backing up, rendering the backup camera useless. Otherwise I was quite impressed.
Thats IT...I am getting a Ranger. Thank you for video....👍
why would you buy a ford when the man said he preferred the chevy?
you heard what you wanted to hear
kenneth smith because it’s a preference, just because he likes the Colorado doesn’t mean your going to like it. What if you want the softer suspension because you will actually go over rough terrain? There’s a lot of other things people would consider over one of another and not only listening to some person giving his opinions.
Mistake
@@kennethsmith8968 Watch Scotty Kilmer.
I have the Colorado and I have basically the same interior as you test and I can say those are my biggest gripes about the interior. I should have really tested the wireless charger because it's absolutely to small to fit the majority of phones in and the seats aren't comfortable, even considering i have upgraded interior... All in all it's a nice looking interior with some big flaws. I should have just bought a base 4x4 model, I'd have been happier.
Good review except for the water test. I think you could drive down the road in the same vehicle multiple times and each time get a different result.
How do you compare z71 Colorado with those tires to rangers
The Sysco bit at the end was hilarious. I work for Ventura foods and I know all to well how much Sysco is sold worldwide. Lmao
I own a 2019 Base model Ford Ranger. My brakes are not spongy, my truck does not roll and it stops great. My 0-60 is 6.8 seconds. So something is wrong with your testing
The base model doesn’t have as many feature as the lariat which means the base model is lighter than the lariat
I wish they would have reviewed the diesel, I have a 2019 Colorado diesel and average 31 to 32 mpg highway, 26 around town, and it can tow 7700lbs, and the torque, my God! Also the suspension on the non Zr2, and midnight editions is less aggressive leading to a better overall ride. I would like a bit more room in the back seat.
I have 2.5l w/ 6spd and pulled a Tiburon
My neighbor, who is in construction, has a GMC Canyon and loves it. He only cruises in it, though, but says he loves it.
Videos like this makes me miss driving again
I've had my 2018 Colorado for 1.5 years and I smile every time I drive it and look at it when I get out. Drives as easy as a car, looks like a badass sporty truck, and the V6 can allow me to fly by whoever I want if I need to.
The Ranger's headlights are too small. Looks like a car someone rigged into a truck. It's still fairly attractive, but from many angles it looks funky as hell lol. I think Chevy's designs, while bizarre, have grown on my substantially. The new Silverado and HD were shocking at first, but I really like them now. The new Sierra though is my personal favorite new truck 😍.
Also, get that Colorado's air dam off lol. Chevy should be slapped for that dumb thing. And what a pain in the ass to get off...
Except the ranger will be flying by you the ranger is quite a bit quicker then the gm twins are
@@victorgirouard1543 Ranger will fly itself straight into the shop for repairs every month
I'm sure your Husband is proud of you there little lady.
I want a Ranger, but I want it with a 5.0L Coyote and a longer bed
then buy F-150
@@ib8954 no, it is too big
@@dole8001 not really, that much bigger then a new ranger.
The 2.7 ecoboost would be a rocket in this truck. Chevy did build a few previous generation Colorados with the 5.3 v8. If they offered that as an option people would buy it for sure.
I get mid 20's, on average (manually calculated) in my '19 Ranger. Last fill up was 25, mixed. I'm guessing something was wrong with your system, whether it was driver, gas pump or something else.
With a turbo, if you floor it from stop you kill the mpg. I used to have a TDI and if you kept the turbo whine down you could save a bunch. BTW, new '20 Ranger owner, loving it. Not sure where the Ride quality complaints come from...
I can relate to wireless charging pad. Most chevys are getting slight smaller pads now
The ranger engine has a break in period, that’s probably the reason for the lower gas mileage
the review vehicles should be broken in though
The whole Ford turbo thing is a way to scam the fuel economy ratings. It’s possible to achieve it, but not when driving normally.
My 2000 Ford Ranger never got the gas mileage it said on the sticker until I found gas stations that sell gas with no ethanol.
I have ta 2019 ZR2 and I like the Ford as well. Didn’t like the lack of non folding rear seat. Plus no Raptor model. Nice truck though.
Seadoo4life i have the LT Colorado and I love it man.Doesn’t the Eco boost have a cheaper body too? Yea in the US there’s not a Raptor option, which they need lol. But they do have them. Fords are nice trucks for sure. But at the time I got mine it wasn’t out yet.
I got a peak at a nicely taken care of 36 ford when he was getting those engine blocks. I'd like to see a video on that car
Very good comparison between the two.
Got the new Ranger right now it kicks ass! Wouldn’t trade it for any of these other trucks.
I have a 2019 Ford Ranger supercrew sport blue and I love it. I dont regret buying it.
I am buying one soon. Any advice or options to get?
@@tylerhenson9063 my advice buy a chevy
@@kennethsmith8968 they have way to many problems. Absolutely not
I own a 2005 Chevy Colorado Z71 with 190,000 miles, never seen the dealership, just bought a 2019 GMC Canyon 4x4, hopefully this truck will be just as reliable as my Chevy Colorado.
Greg Stine just bought an ‘06 Colorado with 70,000 miles in really great shape. Hopefully I get one as dependable as you had lol.
i thought that Sysco bit was way funnier than most considering i manage one of its facilities lol
What I basically got out of this is.. save more money and buy the F150
It's not quite true... if you load up either the Colorado or Ranger with options they get very pricey. I've priced the base and lower end models out where I live and you can still save thousands on buying the smaller truck. If you want a loaded Crew Cab lariat, then yes, the price difference will be small (or maybe nothing). The fuel economy difference between full sized half tons and midsized (!) trucks has never been significant. I got just as good mileage out of a 5.3 with cylinder deactivation & six speed auto on the highway as I could out of a 5cyl Canyon I borrowed years ago.
That just tells you just because it's a turbo does not mean it gets better gas mileage
It's economical when the turbo is not in use!
@@99-Zulu He did overall mileage. The turbo 4cyl is crap
@@koolkitties8552
Well I was trying to make fun of the Ecoboost.
It’s either eco or boost, not both.
Nice comparison. I hope GM & Ford improve their cons, though incremental improvements are not in their DNA. I like your slosh test - very creative.
Practically speaking, the "Slosh Test" is meaningless, though it is an interesting visual gag. Thanks for watching!
- Craig
I have a 2013 ford ranger manual transmission 3.2 turbo diesel. I absolutely love it
You must be down under.
Don Knotts is that you?
Joshua Singletary: Nope. It's a clone of a young Woody Allen!
@@AladdinSaneNYC With a touch of Pee Wee Herman. I expected "The stars at night are big and bright............" at any time.
Well it will be a game changer if GM equip it with the 2.7 inline 4 cylinder
Keith Collins it makes too much sense so GM decided to not do it. Instead they put the engine into CT4 sedan.
I think the Colorado more deserves the 4.3 V6.
Not if they keep that crap 8 speed transmission with an under sized torque converter. Major problem for these trucks.
So it would be a big game-changer for Ford if they put their 2.7 L V6 EcoBoost in the Ranger. Chevy Colorado would not even compete at that point.
@@erikhadinger7655 we have Rangers here in Australia with 3 engine variants,as far as im aware they were developed over here aswell,but they come with the 2.2litre turbo diesel, the 2.0litre bi-turbo diesel and a 3.2litre 5 cylinder turbo diesel...the chevy which is a rebadged holden only has the 2.8 litre turbo diesel over here and is considered to be an absolute bucket of shit...
How much different is the GMC Canyon/Denali than the Colorado?
"Fog horns & seagulls..." nice one👍🤙
I just don’t find this commentary to be true. I own a 2019 ranger and it’s ride is firm. Also the brake pedal feels fine. Just test drive one.
Then you got the only Ranger with a firm brake pedal. On mine and on others I have seen, the brake pedal is very soft with alot of travel before it engages the brakes. Pretty bad.
@@a11062726 true
6:50 "A POSSIBLE indicator of ride smoothness" *claps* OMG thats fantastically hilarious and Im honestly not sure how accurate your RSI is.
Accuracy? LOL, that's just about zero. Really, the "Ride-Smoothness Test" was more for an interesting visual than anything else. Thanks for watching!!! #WeTry
- Craig
I’m on my second Colorado, first was a 2016 Z71,4x4,V6, Ext Cab in Black. The new one is a W/T Crew Cab but as loaded as a W/T can get, with Appearance Package that gets body color door handles and Power Mirrors, dark tinted windows, Alloy Wheels and Bright Window Trim, the W/T Convenience Package that comes with Cruise Control, Locking an dampened Tailgate, 7” MyChevrolet Touch Screen with Apple CarPlay plus OnStar 4 G LTE WIFI, Towing Package with Hitch an wiring, Brake Control and Auto Locking Rear Differential, plus the three available Skid Plates made for Chevy by AEV, all for an out the door price of under 31k! The Ranger I drove did feel a little quicker off the line, but did not seem to want to rev as freely as the Chevy V6, plus the brakes felt soft, very soft and the fit an finish was disappointing.
Who's G8 is that in the driveway?
I have owned 2 Ford Rangers and currently the Chevy Colorado. The Chevy rides great and gets superb fuel mileage. However, I am one of many that have suffered the dreaded A8 Transmission Shudder problem. Have had the transmission fluid changed 3 times which is a temporary fix good for a couple of thousand miles. Chevy will not replace the Torque Converter Clutch. I am an unhappy owner and would advise others to use caution.
What year is your Colorado? And why won't Chevy replace the torque converter?
All these people saying they like the Colorado better but the Rangers selling better lol I got a 2019 XLT and I love it. Where my ranger homies at?!?!
Ry C Absolutely love mine
Just got a 2020 XLT today, awesome
The ranger is selling better? Show me proof.
@@andybub45 just google it, they show the yearly sales for this year, rangers winning
I really appreciate the integrated brake controller in my Colorado, which wasn't even an option on the Ranger. Even were it not for the computer integration (I've used aftermarket "dumb" controllers in other vehicles for many years without incident), which is nice, I'd still appreciate it for being contained within the dash. In a vehicle that isn't a full sized truck or van, it's hard to find a place to mount an aftermarket controller that won't cause me to bang my knee, or that obstructs access to/is obstructed by something else.
You should consider a RedArc Brake Controller. Just a small dial mounts anyplace on the dash and the rest is tucked up under the dash. Everything is out of the way, out of sight. It has worked for me without any issues on my 2018 GMC Canyon. It was a little more money but well worth it in my opion. It really does offer a clean unobstructing install.
I have an '18 Canyon and it's just okay. I like the mileage but the front seats leave something to be desired on longer trips and twisty back roads. They are hard and flat like you mentioned and also the seat bottoms are noticeably shorter than most other cars leaving very little thigh support especially for those of us with longer legs.