"Bodily autonomy, a cornerstone of medical ethics, dictates that just as one cannot be compelled to donate organs or undergo medical procedures without consent, a pregnant individual should also have the right to choose whether to continue a pregnancy. This principle aligns with the ethical and legal standards of informed consent, respecting individual freedom and decision-making over one's own body. While abortion encompasses unique ethical complexities, the fundamental right to bodily autonomy remains a compelling argument for supporting reproductive choice, paralleling the established norms in healthcare where personal consent is paramount for any bodily intervention."
The baby within the woman is not her body, not her dna. If it was her body she would have two heads, four arms, four legs, etc. The Supreme Court in reaching their decision in Roe v. Wade actually called the baby in the womb a "non-person" the same name the Supreme Court gave to slaves about two centuries ago. This allowed owners to beat and kill slaves without any repercussions. Those in favor of killing non-persons also had society autonomy, cultural ethics, medical beliefs, etc. Your are advocating for the killing of an innocent human being. When you stand before God you can explain to Him your rationalization with this abhorrent evil. Have you ever seen an abortion? Have you seen how many nurses and abortion doctors are quitting this practice? They are admitting it is a great evil, and they can no longer be "pro-choice" in good conscience.
no one said it is her body, what I said and have many countless others is that no one has the right to use anyone else's blood, tissue or organs in order to survive without informed consent. Meaning that even if I had a 2 hour old baby needing a kidney transplant and I was the only match, I would still need to give consent before they could utilize it. Just so the baby within the womb wold by this very law require consent. you people are the ones stating these are indeed persons and so have the same rights as all persons, that too would mean they must also abide by the same laws. @@QuoVadisAmerica
@@QuoVadisAmerica I was birthed by a 14yr old girl after an older man raped her. I was given up for adoption and didn't meet her until i was 36 yrs old. It's incredibly sad to see the opportunities and life she missed out on because her religious community forced her to bring me to term. I truly wish she had been able to have an abortion and would have been able to live her life to the fullest. I personally dont find the evidence for God compelling enough to warrant a belief in one. However if there were a God and he was all powerfull and he meant for a person to be born then nothing would be able to stop that. Also I find it sad that you as I'm guessing a Christian by your immediate vile hatred and self righteousness, arent aware of the stories found in your own Book. For by the Bible's account, God himself could be called the first abortion doctor. Numbers 5 11-33 seem to come to mind. I'm guessing you dont know or dont remember the bitter water and the swelling of the womb resulting in barrenness upon suspecting your wife of infidelity do you ?
That's the point Coy, they are persons, actual humans. The killing of the child in the womb is against the law in many countries. Why legal here? Why will you go to jail if you destroy an Eagle egg (obviously in gestational stage) but not go to jail if you kill the human in the gestational stage? You agree with that law? @@CoyTheobalt
If she gave you up for adoption what activities did she miss out on because her religious community "forced" her to have an abortion? I read this and think your not grateful to be alive? @@CoyTheobalt
"Bodily autonomy, a cornerstone of medical ethics, dictates that just as one cannot be compelled to donate organs or undergo medical procedures without consent, a pregnant individual should also have the right to choose whether to continue a pregnancy. This principle aligns with the ethical and legal standards of informed consent, respecting individual freedom and decision-making over one's own body. While abortion encompasses unique ethical complexities, the fundamental right to bodily autonomy remains a compelling argument for supporting reproductive choice, paralleling the established norms in healthcare where personal consent is paramount for any bodily intervention."
The baby within the woman is not her body, not her dna. If it was her body she would have two heads, four arms, four legs, etc. The Supreme Court in reaching their decision in Roe v. Wade actually called the baby in the womb a "non-person" the same name the Supreme Court gave to slaves about two centuries ago. This allowed owners to beat and kill slaves without any repercussions. Those in favor of killing non-persons also had society autonomy, cultural ethics, medical beliefs, etc. Your are advocating for the killing of an innocent human being. When you stand before God you can explain to Him your rationalization with this abhorrent evil. Have you ever seen an abortion? Have you seen how many nurses and abortion doctors are quitting this practice? They are admitting it is a great evil, and they can no longer be "pro-choice" in good conscience.
no one said it is her body, what I said and have many countless others is that no one has the right to use anyone else's blood, tissue or organs in order to survive without informed consent. Meaning that even if I had a 2 hour old baby needing a kidney transplant and I was the only match, I would still need to give consent before they could utilize it. Just so the baby within the womb wold by this very law require consent. you people are the ones stating these are indeed persons and so have the same rights as all persons, that too would mean they must also abide by the same laws.
@@QuoVadisAmerica
@@QuoVadisAmerica I was birthed by a 14yr old girl after an older man raped her. I was given up for adoption and didn't meet her until i was 36 yrs old. It's incredibly sad to see the opportunities and life she missed out on because her religious community forced her to bring me to term. I truly wish she had been able to have an abortion and would have been able to live her life to the fullest. I personally dont find the evidence for God compelling enough to warrant a belief in one. However if there were a God and he was all powerfull and he meant for a person to be born then nothing would be able to stop that. Also I find it sad that you as I'm guessing a Christian by your immediate vile hatred and self righteousness, arent aware of the stories found in your own Book. For by the Bible's account, God himself could be called the first abortion doctor. Numbers 5 11-33 seem to come to mind. I'm guessing you dont know or dont remember the bitter water and the swelling of the womb resulting in barrenness upon suspecting your wife of infidelity do you ?
That's the point Coy, they are persons, actual humans. The killing of the child in the womb is against the law in many countries. Why legal here? Why will you go to jail if you destroy an Eagle egg (obviously in gestational stage) but not go to jail if you kill the human in the gestational stage? You agree with that law? @@CoyTheobalt
If she gave you up for adoption what activities did she miss out on because her religious community "forced" her to have an abortion? I read this and think your not grateful to be alive?
@@CoyTheobalt