The BRITS were crazy back in the day not like that now. Liam's behaviour the fact he insults fans and says we'll be bigger than Oasis, puts you off. Robbie Williams is a great performer, Blur and Oasis had some good songs, The Spice Girls were huge among children and teens, all had their place. Now Liam and Noel have made up (it's amazing) what money can do, when will the overhyping media stop talking about it? It will be back next year when the tour starts.
@@liamgallagher9803 xd I am guessing you are a oasis fan since your name and pfp is oasis-related. You being a groupie doesn't make facts untrue, fanboy.
@@1dorznot really, it mainly just children who think they were born in the 90s just cause they once listened to wonderwall and act like they’re proper hard from Manchester. Realistically, most people know 1 or 2 songs and think they need to go to the concert.
@@NoobMaster6988 by that rationale no one can be into a band if they weren't around at the time. Oasis were huge, and they're still huge. As I said, recent events prove that
Meanwhile in the middle of the Britpop explosion you had Radiohead making a masterpiece called The Bends in 1995 who became the best British band from then on.
@@MarcoGosatti42 No, definitely not, the classically over depressed rich college boy music was not as good as Oasis or Blur lol. Especially considering no album, yes not even Ok Computer, reached the level of success and consistency that What's The Story Morning Glory reached, and that's a fact, the numbers back it up. What did Radiohead ever "revolutionise", they didn't introduce depressing music, or are we forgetting about Nirvana earlier on in the 90's? They just brought back depressing music in a more futuristic way, which was ironically what Blur and Oasis were making fun of, was the at times overly depressing music (I love Nirvana) that could be heard during the rise of grunge
I have to say thoug, i dont think blur and oasis really hate eachother, i think it was just an act pushed by their labels to sell more records and see who could beat the other one.
The BRITS were crazy back in the day. Liam's behaviour the fact he insults fans and says we'll be bigger than Oasis, puts you off. Robbie Williams is a great performer, Blur and Oasis had some good songs, The Spice Girls were huge among children and teens, all had their place. Now Liam and Noel have made up (it's amazing) what money can do, when will the overhyping media stop talking about it? It will be back next year when the tour starts.
@@zulemacardoso1626 Except that isn't true, because Oasis stayed consistently the same from the start to the end of their career, their style ironically doesn't change much, it's the same format of Noel singing like 80% of the songs and Liam singing like 80% of the songs, in their own tones. This is the basic excuse for "Oasis found much more success and weren't one hit wonders", which some people refuse to accept for Blur, who got demolished in the long run, but I still like Blur as well, it's just the facts.
Oasis only boomed cause they were a beatles rip off, which was pretty popular at the time. Blur on the other hand explored different genres and also weren't that full of themselves. I love both bands, but blur wins.
Blur are musically miles ahead of Oasis and have put out consistently good Albums, but Oasis had the biggest peak 95-97.. they arrived just at the right time and their attitude, antics along with singalong drunken anthems just appealed to people after a decade of new romantic, sugary pop and then Euro Dance baggy stuff.
They left out the part where Liam came back a year later or so for some other awards and agreed to fight Robbie, who was among the guests there. Robbie said something like 'I'll just keep my mouth shut'. Liam isn't really some hard case, it's all bravado, but there's no chance he's scared of him!
The BRITS were crazy back in the day. Liam's behaviour the fact he insults fans and says we'll be bigger than Oasis, puts you off. Robbie Williams is a great performer, Blur and Oasis had some good songs, The Spice Girls were huge among children and teens, all had their place. Now Liam and Noel have made up (it's amazing) what money can do, when will the overhyping media stop talking about it? It will be back next year when the tour starts.
Oasis had 2 great albums followed by mediocre crap that sold because they normally had a fight or some drama before the launch of the album and it made the paper. Blur got better and better and well we can safely say have the far greater output not including their solo stuff which also wipes the floor with the Gallaghers... Gorillaz, TGTBTQ, Coxon solo etc.. Robbie would have smashed Liam also.
Guys like Damon Albarn and Thom Yorke took their musical path very seriously and always absorbing many influences under their sleeves, while the Gallagher brothers had their ego stuck up their arses and The Beatles worshipping.
They have multiple great albums afterwards, what lol? It's like it's just that you guys want to hate on the more popular and evidently significantly more successful band. I love how you have to factor in completely irrelevant crap when talking about Oasis vs Blur, Gorillaz have NOTHING to do with the two BANDS, that's a completely different band that Damon went to afterwards, AFTER Oasis factually won. Also, with bangers that were widely successful (more successful than Blur's second most popular song) like Stand By Me, Stop Crying Your Heart Out, etc, that appeared in their later albums, how could you say they were "bad"? They factually won, but why can't people like both?
Blur are the better band and more talented musicians/songwriters. Oasis had the biggest peak 95-97 they were everywhere. Robbie would most likely smash Liam...if it had ever happened then or now.
Me encanta oasis pero eso no les quita lo arrogantes que eran 😏, parecía que les hacían un favor al recoger los premios, cero humildad, pero creo que nos acostumbramos a verlos así, los hermanos gallagher eran sinónimo de soberbia, aunque eso no les quitaba que hacían buena música 👍
The BRITS were crazy back in the day. Liam's behaviour the fact he insults fans and says we'll be bigger than Oasis, puts you off. Robbie Williams is a great performer, Blur and Oasis had some good songs, The Spice Girls were huge among children and teens, all had their place. Now Liam and Noel have made up (it's amazing) what money can do, when will the overhyping media stop talking about it? It will be back next year when the tour starts.
Oasis won this Battle, but Blur won the war. Twenty-five years later, Blur's discography remains great, and they are mostly known for their music legacy; while Oasis' can only be really proud of their first two albums, and are better known for fights and insults. I keep loving all those times, and call myself a fan both of Oasis and Blur, but the truth is the truth. Oasis ganó esta batalla, pero Blur ganó la guerra. veinticinco años después, la discografía de Blur sigue siendo genial, y son conocidos sobre todo por su legado musical; Oasis sólo puede presumir realmente de sus dos primeros discos, y son conocidos más que nada por peleas e insultos. Sigo amando aquellos años, y me sigo declarando fan tanto de Oasis como de Blur, pero la verdad es la verdad.
Russia Is Number 1 How did Oasis win the war? In terms of popularity? Sure, but even Justin Bieber and Taylor Swift are popular, doesn’t mean their music is good. Oasis’ post-Morning Glory discography is relatively mediocre. Not a single good album. Whereas Blur proved everyone that their Britpop success was not just a fluke, evolving into true artists, releasing one good album after the other, never sounding the same, and always receiving the highest praise from both critics and fans. Albarn even outdid himself later on with Gorillaz. Whereas Coxon is still regarded as one of the best and most creative guitarists in the world nowadays. I really like Oasis, they have some great songs, but Blur are on a completely different level.
@@pringlescan1914 Do You really need the insult to defend your ideas. Pity for this. Maybe in England, or Russia, people's got this crystal clear. I don't think so. My feedback is Oasis made it greater on fame, but Blur did it on music. They are still respected artists. Oasis... well, the Gallagher Bross, are still recording good albums on their own, but not so good selling, and definitely outside the main stream. Are They respected as artist? I think not much. Always repeating themselves. And Noel being assailed by funny informal accusations of plagiarism. If not for their fans, they would be completely out of music media, while Damon Albarn had the balls to create something really new and exciting, sell millions, and keep critics mostly on his side. If Oasis come back someday, there would be great spectation, but not for their music. Bets would be on how many fights, or how much time until they asshamingly split again. And still I'd love it to happen, of course, because as I said before, I'm a fan.
José Francisco Solís Yes you spoon, and to start oasis and blur Brit pop and it was the battle of Brit pop not the battle of Spain or where ever the f*ck you’re from and in England Oasis are the clear winners. I’ll admit it blur have a few good songs but it’s only a few where as oasis first 3 albums almost Everysong is an instant classic even the b sides are. Oasis first 3 albums have the biggest cultural impact on British music since the Beatles and that’s a fact. It is true at first blur did sell more albums but that was at the beginning in the 90s oasis have overwhelmingly surpassed blur now. And I ain’t here comparing there other caress after there bands you numpty I’m talking about oasis and blur. There are many TH-cam videos on who won Brit pop and every video says Oasis so do your research and I know what I am talking about since I am from England ask any teenager or kid what do You think about blur , they will go who ? But ask them oasis they’ll go they’re amAzing class , there music has and will stand the testimony of time whereas blur has two popular British songs that have stayed park life and song 2
If you are talking specifically about Definitely Maybe and Morning Glory I cannot disagree, but when talking about the balance of an entire career including the members' solo or side projects, Blur ends up doing better.
@@murilosouza4369 But that makes zero sense, because we're clearly factoring how well each BAND does against each other, not what the individuals did beforehand, during or after the rock bands duration lmao. Bringing in irrelevant factors like Gorillaz just shows a hilarious level of cope, because that isn't Blur, that's Gorillaz, different band and not involved BETWEEN the discussion of Oasis vs Blur as BANDS, not individuals. When you compare and argue whose better between Nirvana and Pearl Jam, I don't go and say "well Nirvana are better anyway because Dave Grohl went and made Foo Fighters", it's a completely different topic that brings in an external factor. Gorillaz dictated the success of Damon, not the band of Blur. Oasis did significantly better, and whilst I also like Blur it's just the facts
@@hughsmith7489 But I'm not conditioning my analysis solely based on the members' solo careers and side projects, I've included the bands' discography themselves. Oasis may even have two masterpieces (Definitely Maybe and Morning Glory), but there are other albums that despite having high points, are merely ok. Meanwhile, Blur, despite having only one great work (Parklife), still has a discography which is very cohesive, has practically no bad material and ends up lasting longer. Solo careers and side projects are just the icing on the cake in this comparison.
@@sonicyouth7177 That joke would make sense if Oasis weren't the extremely influential and much more popular and successful band, with multiple songs (not just one) to actually solidify their fame. Their main song is actually known by its name, not as the "woo hoo" song
Their songs are very well crafted in my opinion. Graham uses the guitar in various types of creative ways and Alex inputs a lot of cool bass lines. Blur is the best band of the Blur category.
What makes someone great in the field of arts? I guess people really overrate a lot of stuff, but sometimes for the wrong reasons. It becomes more like a plastic discussion, sometimes nonsense, like some "apples are better than oranges" kind of debate. I think that Blur deserves their credit, their albums from 1993-1999 are full of great moments and creative music representation. Very original stuff. I guess the popularity brings some sort of distorted way of digesting art, mainly music. I used to listen The Auteurs, Pulp, Kula Shaker, Teenage Fanclub, and a lot, lot more of british things. My dad sometimes imported CD's for me. I'm from Brazil, and even though I've studied and respectfully and openly listened to lots of britpop era material, At least I was free of a pre-conceived notion of some bands, except knowing that some of them were popular in mid 90's. I remember listening to every second of Blur's 13 album in my Walkman under my blanket when I was a child and it was very special to me, it was just music, creative music. It wasn't overrated lads that girls screams to cause they're "beautiful" and put posters on the bedroom in a poser-way, y'know? It was just absorption of art, and cool sounds. Oasis is great, kind of a more direct Gibson-driven modern rock n' roll, which is something that I find very unique too, even when minimalistic, still it's Oasis, still it's very recognizable. Noel Gallagher usually play distorted full chords, while Graham usually creates some specific guitar inputs for the song. For example, observe the guitar line of "Charmless Man" by Blur and "Roll With It", by Oasis. When I was a teenager I didn't get why people were so fond of Oasis, I thought that were a lot of others complex bands to pay attention to, but now, at 24 yrs old, I see that this type of argument is bullshit. I have my small collection of Oasis albums, and I truly like and respect the music. About the Beatles, for me it's impossible to imagine that you are living in 1967, buying and listening to Sgt. Peppers, Revolver, White Album or any of these post 1965 albuns for the first time and not thinking that it was lots of groundbreaking, emotional, sometimes raw, sometimes aggressive and beautiful music in these albums. There's nothing like The Beatles. I guess some people hate it because it's to much "popular" even though those critics normally don't have knowledge of half of the Beatles catalog. Some people hate it because they have a preconception that the band only talk about love. Some people hate it cause they don't see what is special about songs that don't sound like Ariana Grande. I guess that in order to absorve music and music concepts, you first have to be open to it. I've first listened to The Doors when I was a child, but just when I was a teenager I really understand what was special about that tapestry of minimalistic blend of instruments together. Hammond Organs playing bass-parts, very creative guitar lines, and great compositions. Before that it was just a 'okay' band to me. By the way, thanks for the polite replies, sorry for my shitty english and pardon for the long text.
I have Blur CDs bought Leisure in 1991... I like Robbie Williams better than Oasis... Order CDs from estocks in Jersey (Guernsey ebay joke... Republic of Barclay card)
Suede are truly one of the great British bands at this point. Their first three records (and the B-side compilation 'Sci-Fi Lullabies') are seminal Britpop, and they have had a whole brilliant second act to their career since reforming in 2010. Meanwhile Oasis members are still arsing around trying to repeat what they were doing 30 years ago.
Wanker band 1 vs wanker band 2 Tbh ive only listened to blur and their best songs arent even britpop. Rock, bossa nova, whatever genre The Universal is. Oasis cant sing and they proved it. Wonderwall is kinda alright tbh, but i only know of it through Jay Z.
the gallagher brothers are tories? are you serious right now? the notoriously working class gallagher brothers are tories? is being a tory now synonymous with “someone i don’t like” ? the gallagher brothers grew up in a council estate in manchester. they grew up in a labor house and have endorsed labor candidates publicly. in fact noel endoresed fucking tony blair at the brits! (he later went on to regret that lmfao) but not middle class swanky blur? the obvious tory voter representatives?
blur: kissing and hugging people
oasis: look straight talk snob
The 90s were epic. Miss that decade so much
The Grammys: supportive with jokes
The Brits: Angry British people beefing with each other the whole night
Grammys are shit. Aimed at rnb, rap and black music
@@Kai-worldclass I like the Brit’s better, it’s just generally better music and people win the awards for actually being good
@@Kai-worldclass Why you being a racist shithead for lol?
@@Kai-worldclass Damn bro being fcking racist. lol Even the Brits today were hip-hop dominated too. Stfu
The BRITS were crazy back in the day not like that now. Liam's behaviour the fact he insults fans and says we'll be bigger than Oasis, puts you off. Robbie Williams is a great performer, Blur and Oasis had some good songs, The Spice Girls were huge among children and teens, all had their place. Now Liam and Noel have made up (it's amazing) what money can do, when will the overhyping media stop talking about it? It will be back next year when the tour starts.
Robbie starting the Celebrity boxing scene back then
I love how Liam just doesn't give a shit..best way to be
Two of the best Britpop bands ever. Idc who's the winner, they're made memorable albums. Damon and Noel are amazing songwriters.
Oasis was a huge thing in the 90s and their songs from that period were immaculate. But in a long run Blur and especially Damon Albarn eventually won
No way mate look at the popularities today oasis are popular with gen z and kids from the 10s blur are unheard of pretty much
@@liamgallagher9803 gorillaz are bigger than both
@@sarucanine6044 😂😂😂 deluded
@@liamgallagher9803 xd I am guessing you are a oasis fan since your name and pfp is oasis-related. You being a groupie doesn't make facts untrue, fanboy.
Looking at Gen Z, they are
It's funny how Oasis and it's fans, always sees the band as bigger than it really is...
Ikr? They songs are of course good but also just a beatles rip off.
It fits really well.
The last few weeks prove just how big the band was, and remains
@@1dorznot really, it mainly just children who think they were born in the 90s just cause they once listened to wonderwall and act like they’re proper hard from Manchester. Realistically, most people know 1 or 2 songs and think they need to go to the concert.
@@NoobMaster6988 by that rationale no one can be into a band if they weren't around at the time. Oasis were huge, and they're still huge. As I said, recent events prove that
Meanwhile in the middle of the Britpop explosion you had Radiohead making a masterpiece called The Bends in 1995 who became the best British band from then on.
No
@@mariol2116 Errr yes.
@@mariol2116 con la llorona en la espalda no me imagino una opinion decente.
@@MarcoGosatti42 No, definitely not, the classically over depressed rich college boy music was not as good as Oasis or Blur lol. Especially considering no album, yes not even Ok Computer, reached the level of success and consistency that What's The Story Morning Glory reached, and that's a fact, the numbers back it up. What did Radiohead ever "revolutionise", they didn't introduce depressing music, or are we forgetting about Nirvana earlier on in the 90's? They just brought back depressing music in a more futuristic way, which was ironically what Blur and Oasis were making fun of, was the at times overly depressing music (I love Nirvana) that could be heard during the rise of grunge
@@hughsmith7489I'd rather take depressed music over generic guitar pop music. Oasis is generic asf
I have to say thoug, i dont think blur and oasis really hate eachother, i think it was just an act pushed by their labels to sell more records and see who could beat the other one.
bingo, they sold like 500,000 singles each in one week or something because of it. Absolutely crazy numbers.
Yeah it seems like it
Liam, always worth watching
The BRITS were crazy back in the day. Liam's behaviour the fact he insults fans and says we'll be bigger than Oasis, puts you off. Robbie Williams is a great performer, Blur and Oasis had some good songs, The Spice Girls were huge among children and teens, all had their place. Now Liam and Noel have made up (it's amazing) what money can do, when will the overhyping media stop talking about it? It will be back next year when the tour starts.
That was epic and noostalgic.
That Blur scene man!
Liam would murder robbie in a ring
Kid Castle Music lol he wouldn’t. Robbie does boxing since his 20s
I doubt it
Robbie's gut can take a punch. Liam could mentally injure Robbie with swear words though.
Liam is thin and weak with no physical prowess in any way. Thats why he just stood on stage like a statue.
Voice Note King th-cam.com/video/a9PYuxO6LHU/w-d-xo.html lol look at this 😂 he has less movement than a playmobil toy
Who cares who was the better band? I love them both! Liam wasn’t scared of Robbie tho 😂😂
Oasis picked a fight with... well everyone
Even themselves lol
Liam is a legend but I love Robbie and Damon too
Liam is a bastard
Nobody:
NoEl:MaRmItE
There’s just not enough cocaine on display here.
I'm here just for 0:35 😂
Love this moment and Daimon's young chaotic energy sm. He's still like that after 30+ years, tho
BLUR >
I personally listen to both blur and oasis, but blur is my favourites since I was like 5 y.o lol
me when im delusional
Sales and hits says otherwise
@@ND-OPSOasis decidió vender y le dio igual el arte,Blur siempre tuvo más en claro sus convicciones
@@zulemacardoso1626 Except that isn't true, because Oasis stayed consistently the same from the start to the end of their career, their style ironically doesn't change much, it's the same format of Noel singing like 80% of the songs and Liam singing like 80% of the songs, in their own tones. This is the basic excuse for "Oasis found much more success and weren't one hit wonders", which some people refuse to accept for Blur, who got demolished in the long run, but I still like Blur as well, it's just the facts.
90% of the ppl who say oasis are better than blur have never actually listened to them or they just know song 2 or girls and boys
Because nobody cares about blur
babushka boi well they’re missing out a lot then
I like both but I prefer Oasis :)
Oasis only boomed cause they were a beatles rip off, which was pretty popular at the time. Blur on the other hand explored different genres and also weren't that full of themselves. I love both bands, but blur wins.
Blur are musically miles ahead of Oasis and have put out consistently good Albums, but Oasis had the biggest peak 95-97.. they arrived just at the right time and their attitude, antics along with singalong drunken anthems just appealed to people after a decade of new romantic, sugary pop and then Euro Dance baggy stuff.
I fucking love Oasis so much
Robbie Williams is what happens when nobody has punched you very hard in the face.
Brilliant 😂❤
Во были времена..🖤
everyone is beefing with everyone
They left out the part where Liam came back a year later or so for some other awards and agreed to fight Robbie, who was among the guests there. Robbie said something like 'I'll just keep my mouth shut'. Liam isn't really some hard case, it's all bravado, but there's no chance he's scared of him!
The BRITS were crazy back in the day. Liam's behaviour the fact he insults fans and says we'll be bigger than Oasis, puts you off. Robbie Williams is a great performer, Blur and Oasis had some good songs, The Spice Girls were huge among children and teens, all had their place. Now Liam and Noel have made up (it's amazing) what money can do, when will the overhyping media stop talking about it? It will be back next year when the tour starts.
I remember. We used to love it. School days...now I don't know who's who at Brits
Blur all day everyday (my opinion might be swayed by the fact that alex is a family friend)...😂
Ur deffo a posh boy then
James X Racing should be having words about that then
what the fuck youre so lucky! have you ever met him???
Nancy Dawson yeh...we first met him and his family at the pantomime in chipping norton a few years ago
did he gaves u a cheese? i'm curious
Blur.
Oasis sells waaaaaaaaaaaaay more records than blur could ever dream of
@@ND-OPS selling more refords doesn't mean you're better. look at taylor swift, harry styles etc.......
AAAALLLLLL THE PEOPLEEEE😂😂
Love Blur. LOVE Oasis!
리암 진짜ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅌㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
1:03 박아놔야 겠다
개미친놈ㅋㅋㅋㅋ존나 좋아
ㅏ아 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅜㅋㅋㅋ
liam is so funny i love him omg
*Damon.
I guess if you're 15 it must be funny
@@mainsmain i just want to hit idk
@@mainsmain its better to be fifteen and enjoying life rather than to be 30 and miserable like you
0:55 Michael Hutchence :'(
They cut out the "Has-beens shouldn't be presenting awards to gonna-be's" - Liam, pointing at Hutchence
All the people
So many people
And they all go hand-in-hand
Hand-in-hand through their marmite/shitelife.
- Noel and Liam Gallagher.
AHAHHA the Attitude of all these lads
OasisBlur
1:30 yeah some things I don’t miss from the 90s
Waittttt I never knew Bob Mortimer was on when blur won
omg ur alive!
Seriously what a stupid move by Robbie
In Robbie's defence, Liam hasn't taken him up on his offer. . .
Melissa Wright Because he’s a 50 year old father who isn’t going to fight someone who offered him out 20 years ago
He’d get his ass kicked back to stoke. Great guy, just too nice
This little fairy is kidding himself thinking he can stand a chance against Liam Gallagher lol
Liam starts fights for fun
Eddie Hearn seeing Robbie vs liam
Robbie Williams 🤦🏻♂️. Your down with the vale
Oasis forever
Robbie Williams would have had Liam Gallagher any day
James 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Of course...
James would he fuck
@@liamoconnor8811 sorry Liam I know that's you but Robbie is harder than you mate
Liam scared of Robbie? 😂 nice one
i dont like any of blurs songs to be honest, but oasis is from another world. I love OASIS
Idk who won but Gorillaz are doing so better! And whose hand was it on ? Yes the front man of blur 😂
Yeah but it's blur vs oasis, not oasis vs Damon Albarn
are they doing better? oasis have a sold out tour world tour performing to millions… could gorillaz do that?
@@aishah7730they only just reformed. They wouldn’t have stood the test of time otherwise
@@Hutchman98 they were still selling out stadiums in 2009. i think they would’ve been fine.
@@Hutchman98You're kidding right? Blur never broke America, but Oasis did.
Oasis. One of the greatest bands of 90s. Like Nirvana or Alice In chains.
Ноуп
Oasis es mi favorito musicalmente hablando, aunque también me gustan muchas canciones de blur y son mas carismáticos que los Gallagher
Why do I always think of Kevin and Perry, when I see Liam 😂
You may prefer Oasis, but you have to admit that Blur were better people.
Watch the interview with Nardwuar and say that again
But they dont give awards like that nobody cates which are better people
Alejandro Molina boring southern fairies are better people?
Next joke plz :D
@@Kelvinack my thoughts exactly
This was the uks biggie vs Tupac not quite as brutal and tragic. But still very fun lol.
The agenda against oasis is mad. No mention of how blur moved their single, made it a war, then took the piss on top of the pops
Lmao, it wasn't Blur's decision, it was all made by their labels to push both bands' sales.
I love robbie hes such a nob its just funny, for real tho I'm so up for the boxing Match, see robbie just MAULED
Robbie was defo the gay one in Take That.
blur 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
Oasis had 2 great albums followed by mediocre crap that sold because they normally had a fight or some drama before the launch of the album and it made the paper.
Blur got better and better and well we can safely say have the far greater output not including their solo stuff which also wipes the floor with the Gallaghers... Gorillaz, TGTBTQ, Coxon solo etc..
Robbie would have smashed Liam also.
Could not agree more. Damon is still serious about music, and Gorillaz are next level. The only thing the Gallaghers are serious about is their egos.
Guys like Damon Albarn and Thom Yorke took their musical path very seriously and always absorbing many influences under their sleeves, while the Gallagher brothers had their ego stuck up their arses and The Beatles worshipping.
They have multiple great albums afterwards, what lol? It's like it's just that you guys want to hate on the more popular and evidently significantly more successful band. I love how you have to factor in completely irrelevant crap when talking about Oasis vs Blur, Gorillaz have NOTHING to do with the two BANDS, that's a completely different band that Damon went to afterwards, AFTER Oasis factually won. Also, with bangers that were widely successful (more successful than Blur's second most popular song) like Stand By Me, Stop Crying Your Heart Out, etc, that appeared in their later albums, how could you say they were "bad"? They factually won, but why can't people like both?
@thesaltwastaken Amazing album, Waiting for the Rapture is great
Agree, oasis its great, have talent but they have only two good albums
Blur are the better band and more talented musicians/songwriters.
Oasis had the biggest peak 95-97 they were everywhere.
Robbie would most likely smash Liam...if it had ever happened then or now.
Even if he was a bit of a batty?
@@magg93 Hello 90s this is the next century calling.
Hello this is 2024 calling, what seems to be the issue my good lord?@@TheBearAndTheBull
@@magg93anyone using the term batty is clearly stuck in the past.
@@garethlawton5278 Anyone sucking cock while listening to Blur is clearly not gay..
Oasis ❤️
뽀뽀발사하는 데이먼 넘 좋다
I don't like bout of them.... So, Round one..... FIGHT
Me encanta oasis pero eso no les quita lo arrogantes que eran 😏, parecía que les hacían un favor al recoger los premios, cero humildad, pero creo que nos acostumbramos a verlos así, los hermanos gallagher eran sinónimo de soberbia, aunque eso no les quitaba que hacían buena música 👍
La música que hicieron es incomparable y eso es lo que importa.
Was Robbie always that soft??? 🙄
Robbie is a manchild using his dad's money. Even the nicest dude Jimmy Page can't stand his arse lol
@@zackzallie8735 Jimmy Page walks a very fine line between "nicest dude" and "nonce"
The BRITS were crazy back in the day. Liam's behaviour the fact he insults fans and says we'll be bigger than Oasis, puts you off. Robbie Williams is a great performer, Blur and Oasis had some good songs, The Spice Girls were huge among children and teens, all had their place. Now Liam and Noel have made up (it's amazing) what money can do, when will the overhyping media stop talking about it? It will be back next year when the tour starts.
BLUR>>>>OASIS
Oasis sells waaaaaaaaaaaaay more records than blur could ever dream of
Damon Albarn has more talent in his left toe than the Oasis brothers
Someones been on the wacky backy.
Still can't sellout knebworth
Shite life 👌😂
Robbies only relevant now talking about a band that broke up 11 years ago
Atleast Robbie can still sing. Liam can't. Sounded like a homeless alcoholic in the mic after the first couple of years.
como ke shit life >:(
Sporty spice was so sexy
nahhhh. It was:
Geri
Baby
Posh
Scary
Sporty
But as you grow older you realise that 'Scary' was the best. That rack!
I don't like Robbie😂
script plz... what is that spicy girls says??
"Liam, come and have a go if you think you're hard enough."
What’s the song called at 0:51
cigarettes and alcohol by oasis
épicooo
shitelife haha
Noel looks so hot
Wahahahaha
Liam is my man crush.
Jesus Robbie Williams 😮 Very strange 😳
Oasis won this Battle, but Blur won the war. Twenty-five years later, Blur's discography remains great, and they are mostly known for their music legacy; while Oasis' can only be really proud of their first two albums, and are better known for fights and insults.
I keep loving all those times, and call myself a fan both of Oasis and Blur, but the truth is the truth.
Oasis ganó esta batalla, pero Blur ganó la guerra. veinticinco años después, la discografía de Blur sigue siendo genial, y son conocidos sobre todo por su legado musical; Oasis sólo puede presumir realmente de sus dos primeros discos, y son conocidos más que nada por peleas e insultos.
Sigo amando aquellos años, y me sigo declarando fan tanto de Oasis como de Blur, pero la verdad es la verdad.
Are you a mong ? Mate its the other way around Blur won the battle Oasis won the war.Everyone knows it its very cleary, Very clear in england.
CPOCA yeah I agree with you oasis had more of a cultural impact then blur ever did
Russia Is Number 1 How did Oasis win the war? In terms of popularity? Sure, but even Justin Bieber and Taylor Swift are popular, doesn’t mean their music is good.
Oasis’ post-Morning Glory discography is relatively mediocre. Not a single good album. Whereas Blur proved everyone that their Britpop success was not just a fluke, evolving into true artists, releasing one good album after the other, never sounding the same, and always receiving the highest praise from both critics and fans.
Albarn even outdid himself later on with Gorillaz. Whereas Coxon is still regarded as one of the best and most creative guitarists in the world nowadays.
I really like Oasis, they have some great songs, but Blur are on a completely different level.
@@pringlescan1914 Do You really need the insult to defend your ideas. Pity for this.
Maybe in England, or Russia, people's got this crystal clear. I don't think so. My feedback is Oasis made it greater on fame, but Blur did it on music. They are still respected artists.
Oasis... well, the Gallagher Bross, are still recording good albums on their own, but not so good selling, and definitely outside the main stream. Are They respected as artist? I think not much. Always repeating themselves. And Noel being assailed by funny informal accusations of plagiarism. If not for their fans, they would be completely out of music media, while Damon Albarn had the balls to create something really new and exciting, sell millions, and keep critics mostly on his side.
If Oasis come back someday, there would be great spectation, but not for their music. Bets would be on how many fights, or how much time until they asshamingly split again. And still I'd love it to happen, of course, because as I said before, I'm a fan.
José Francisco Solís Yes you spoon, and to start oasis and blur Brit pop and it was the battle of Brit pop not the battle of Spain or where ever the f*ck you’re from and in England Oasis are the clear winners. I’ll admit it blur have a few good songs but it’s only a few where as oasis first 3 albums almost Everysong is an instant classic even the b sides are. Oasis first 3 albums have the biggest cultural impact on British music since the Beatles and that’s a fact. It is true at first blur did sell more albums but that was at the beginning in the 90s oasis have overwhelmingly surpassed blur now. And I ain’t here comparing there other caress after there bands you numpty I’m talking about oasis and blur. There are many TH-cam videos on who won Brit pop and every video says Oasis so do your research and I know what I am talking about since I am from England ask any teenager or kid what do
You think about blur , they will go who ? But ask them oasis they’ll go they’re amAzing class , there music has and will stand the testimony of time whereas blur has two popular British songs that have stayed park life and song 2
Blur are better that Oasis let’s face it
😂 no
Not even close
Their b side album 10x better than anything blur wrote
Facts
Facts
Oasis is just better overall..metalhead, hardcore punk rocker even scenes and pop listeners can enjoy any oasis song
If you are talking specifically about Definitely Maybe and Morning Glory I cannot disagree, but when talking about the balance of an entire career including the members' solo or side projects, Blur ends up doing better.
@@murilosouza4369 yas
@@murilosouza4369 But that makes zero sense, because we're clearly factoring how well each BAND does against each other, not what the individuals did beforehand, during or after the rock bands duration lmao. Bringing in irrelevant factors like Gorillaz just shows a hilarious level of cope, because that isn't Blur, that's Gorillaz, different band and not involved BETWEEN the discussion of Oasis vs Blur as BANDS, not individuals. When you compare and argue whose better between Nirvana and Pearl Jam, I don't go and say "well Nirvana are better anyway because Dave Grohl went and made Foo Fighters", it's a completely different topic that brings in an external factor. Gorillaz dictated the success of Damon, not the band of Blur. Oasis did significantly better, and whilst I also like Blur it's just the facts
@@hughsmith7489 But I'm not conditioning my analysis solely based on the members' solo careers and side projects, I've included the bands' discography themselves. Oasis may even have two masterpieces (Definitely Maybe and Morning Glory), but there are other albums that despite having high points, are merely ok. Meanwhile, Blur, despite having only one great work (Parklife), still has a discography which is very cohesive, has practically no bad material and ends up lasting longer. Solo careers and side projects are just the icing on the cake in this comparison.
@@hughsmith7489 Bloody hell mate you're triggered. Liam isn't going to fuck you so stop gargling on his bollocks
Liam would butcher Robbie Williams in a bare knuckle boxing match
oasis > blur
absolutely. blur was nice, but they never could be what oasis was at that moment. the things that oasis generate over the people are incomparable.
blur > oasis
Oasis sure won the Britpop battle but Blur has more than that: 13, s/t album, Think Tank
James Cook oasis had better music
@@spanishsplinters what the fuck? Blur is definitely better. Go listen to them
eso mi Robbieeeeeee
Oasis >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Blur > who is Oasis?
@@sonicyouth7177the more successful and influencial band
@@sonicyouth7177 That joke would make sense if Oasis weren't the extremely influential and much more popular and successful band, with multiple songs (not just one) to actually solidify their fame. Their main song is actually known by its name, not as the "woo hoo" song
That was embarrassing to watch 😂
Robbie called Liam out when Liam was touring overseas. Robbie is 100% gay as the day, no question, and would get killed in the ring by anyone.
I don't think Robbie would mind his "ring" getting killed 🍆
What is bluuuuuur?
Pulp is better
And suede, the two of them are unsung heroes! I do love blur as well, but suede is probably my favourite band of that genre with pulp in close second.
grow up robbie jeez.....
…mate. They’re all immature, self obsessed twats, especially back then.
@@maritime7776 cry bitch.
Blur have to be one of the most overrated British bands. I much prefer Damon's work with the Gorillaz.
Their songs are very well crafted in my opinion. Graham uses the guitar in various types of creative ways and Alex inputs a lot of cool bass lines. Blur is the best band of the Blur category.
@@peopletakepicturesofeachother, indeed, they were well-crafted, they were no amateurs. But that doesn't make them one of the greats.
I think The Beatles are the most overrated
@@Adam-vy6nl, I'd say they're adequately rated. Hard to dispute their achievements.
What makes someone great in the field of arts?
I guess people really overrate a lot of stuff, but sometimes for the wrong reasons. It becomes more like a plastic discussion, sometimes nonsense, like some "apples are better than oranges" kind of debate.
I think that Blur deserves their credit, their albums from 1993-1999 are full of great moments and creative music representation. Very original stuff. I guess the popularity brings some sort of distorted way of digesting art, mainly music.
I used to listen The Auteurs, Pulp, Kula Shaker, Teenage Fanclub, and a lot, lot more of british things. My dad sometimes imported CD's for me.
I'm from Brazil, and even though I've studied and respectfully and openly listened to lots of britpop era material, At least I was free of a pre-conceived notion of some bands, except knowing that some of them were popular in mid 90's. I remember listening to every second of Blur's 13 album in my Walkman under my blanket when I was a child and it was very special to me, it was just music, creative music. It wasn't overrated lads that girls screams to cause they're "beautiful" and put posters on the bedroom in a poser-way, y'know? It was just absorption of art, and cool sounds.
Oasis is great, kind of a more direct Gibson-driven modern rock n' roll, which is something that I find very unique too, even when minimalistic, still it's Oasis, still it's very recognizable.
Noel Gallagher usually play distorted full chords, while Graham usually creates some specific guitar inputs for the song. For example, observe the guitar line of "Charmless Man" by Blur and "Roll With It", by Oasis.
When I was a teenager I didn't get why people were so fond of Oasis, I thought that were a lot of others complex bands to pay attention to, but now, at 24 yrs old, I see that this type of argument is bullshit. I have my small collection of Oasis albums, and I truly like and respect the music.
About the Beatles, for me it's impossible to imagine that you are living in 1967, buying and listening to Sgt. Peppers, Revolver, White Album or any of these post 1965 albuns for the first time and not thinking that it was lots of groundbreaking, emotional, sometimes raw, sometimes aggressive and beautiful music in these albums. There's nothing like The Beatles. I guess some people hate it because it's to much "popular" even though those critics normally don't have knowledge of half of the Beatles catalog. Some people hate it because they have a preconception that the band only talk about love. Some people hate it cause they don't see what is special about songs that don't sound like Ariana Grande. I guess that in order to absorve music and music concepts, you first have to be open to it.
I've first listened to The Doors when I was a child, but just when I was a teenager I really understand what was special about that tapestry of minimalistic blend of instruments together. Hammond Organs playing bass-parts, very creative guitar lines, and great compositions. Before that it was just a 'okay' band to me.
By the way, thanks for the polite replies, sorry for my shitty english and pardon for the long text.
Blur is fuckin overrats.
I have Blur CDs bought Leisure in 1991... I like Robbie Williams better than Oasis... Order CDs from estocks in Jersey (Guernsey ebay joke... Republic of Barclay card)
Oasis>>>>
Suede/Pulp/SFA/SuperGrass>>>>>>>>>> aosis&brul
😂😂😂
Suede are truly one of the great British bands at this point. Their first three records (and the B-side compilation 'Sci-Fi Lullabies') are seminal Britpop, and they have had a whole brilliant second act to their career since reforming in 2010. Meanwhile Oasis members are still arsing around trying to repeat what they were doing 30 years ago.
Meh, The Verve and Radiohead beat all of em
I couldn't stand Blur. Not one single song
Each to their own
Gosto das suas bandas mais o oasis para mim e melhor
That's a you problem. Blur made a bad album and it's still better than any Oashit album.
Wanker band 1 vs wanker band 2
Tbh ive only listened to blur and their best songs arent even britpop. Rock, bossa nova, whatever genre The Universal is.
Oasis cant sing and they proved it. Wonderwall is kinda alright tbh, but i only know of it through Jay Z.
I seriously hope you're joking
@@lucafrancis5572 he must be american, they don't know shit about music
@@MrBackWolf oh 100%
Worst take I've heard in a long time. Its ur own opinion fella but its a bad one
the homies WOULD never gave you the aux lil bro😭
Liam and Noel a right pair of bell ends wouldn't be surprised if they are Tories
noel maybe but liam nah
the gallagher brothers are tories? are you serious right now? the notoriously working class gallagher brothers are tories? is being a tory now synonymous with “someone i don’t like” ? the gallagher brothers grew up in a council estate in manchester. they grew up in a labor house and have endorsed labor candidates publicly. in fact noel endoresed fucking tony blair at the brits! (he later went on to regret that lmfao)
but not middle class swanky blur? the obvious tory voter representatives?
Oasis ❤❤❤❤ a vita