I've been thinking about trying out Vision 3 once I've got through my stash of film in the fridge (covid and mental health issues got in the way of shooting a lot) as colour film, well all film is getting so expensive now. I'm quite up for trying ENC2 at home, but it's really cool to see a side by side comparison with C41, really helpful. Thank you for sharing :)
Hello Myke...I'm happy that you found it useful and I really recommend you to try out some of the Vision 3 range, it is a really good quality filmstock. I hope you soon feel better again and start shooting more. Take care my man a nd keep moving forward :)
Hola Julián. Nada en particular, solo recuerda configurar el ISO correcto y si quieres estar seguro que las fotos no te salgan underexposed puedes colocar en la camera un ISO menor que del film que estés disparando (pushing)
Hello there. If you shoot mainly ECN2 then that makes complete sense. But if you shoot mainly c41, it is nice to know how this chemistry affects a film designed for ECN2 😎
The primary difference in results here is that the C-41 processed movie film has a distinct green color cast or color shift from its cross-processing. Whether that can be adequately compensated in digital processing depended on how picky you are, I suppose. Lab automatic scanning equipment is not programmed for this, so that result is likely to be inferior to scanning results at home. Printing in a darkroom on RA-4 color paper would yield even worse results, regardless of which process you use on the film. Vision 3 film uses a unique set of dyes designed to match those used in the film stock used to print movies. RA-4 paper uses a different dye set designed to match the dyes in C-41 compatible film, so printing any Vision 3 stock on RA-4 paper presents a noticeable mismatch of color which is not going to be corrected. That is not to say that some subjects may look fine in the result, but you will never achieve a faithful or accurate result in your print.
Hey Randall... Thanks for sharing your views. I agree with you that the suitability of the results would depend on someone's work flow and final intentions. I cannot argue that of course the very best results of vision 3 can only be obtained by using the ECN2 chemistry design for it. However for the casual shooter for non professional work I think c41 remains a nice more accessible option for processing. Thanks for watching and it is nice to have you here, welcome to the family 😊
Hello there... Thanks for watching my video. I'm not suggesting on the video that people should develop their ECN2 film on a C41 minilab. I'm just merely comparing the results by using different methods.
Oh this is awesome! Been wanting to experiment with ECN-2 and this made me so excited. Cheers for the video, mate!
Hello there.... Happy that you enjoyed the video and you should try some ECN2... Defenetly worth it 😎
Great video, just what I was looking for👋🏻
I'm very happy to hear that. If you would like to see any other comparison let me know 😎👍🏽
I've been thinking about trying out Vision 3 once I've got through my stash of film in the fridge (covid and mental health issues got in the way of shooting a lot) as colour film, well all film is getting so expensive now. I'm quite up for trying ENC2 at home, but it's really cool to see a side by side comparison with C41, really helpful. Thank you for sharing :)
Hello Myke...I'm happy that you found it useful and I really recommend you to try out some of the Vision 3 range, it is a really good quality filmstock. I hope you soon feel better again and start shooting more. Take care my man a nd keep moving forward :)
An interesting trial Armando. My next test is to use Vision 3 film but remove the remjet layer before developing in C41 chems!
Cool Nick... The remjet layer always has to be removed before doing C41 development 😉
¿Algún consejo para disparar el ECN2 en una point and shoot?
Hola Julián. Nada en particular, solo recuerda configurar el ISO correcto y si quieres estar seguro que las fotos no te salgan underexposed puedes colocar en la camera un ISO menor que del film que estés disparando (pushing)
@@ArmandoStreets ¡Gracias por el consejo!
You said you didn't make any adjustments to scans, but showed positive / inverted images.
Hey there Max... Thanks for watching... I'm not sure what you mean 😉
@@ArmandoStreets scan with no adjustments (raw TIFF/DNG) looks like negative.
What ISO did u select in ur camera? 200 ISO?
Hello my friend... Yes... Both rolls were shot at box speed of 200 ISO 😉
Why not process with ECN-2 at home and avoid the lab fees?
Hello there. If you shoot mainly ECN2 then that makes complete sense. But if you shoot mainly c41, it is nice to know how this chemistry affects a film designed for ECN2 😎
The primary difference in results here is that the C-41 processed movie film has a distinct green color cast or color shift from its cross-processing. Whether that can be adequately compensated in digital processing depended on how picky you are, I suppose. Lab automatic scanning equipment is not programmed for this, so that result is likely to be inferior to scanning results at home. Printing in a darkroom on RA-4 color paper would yield even worse results, regardless of which process you use on the film. Vision 3 film uses a unique set of dyes designed to match those used in the film stock used to print movies. RA-4 paper uses a different dye set designed to match the dyes in C-41 compatible film, so printing any Vision 3 stock on RA-4 paper presents a noticeable mismatch of color which is not going to be corrected. That is not to say that some subjects may look fine in the result, but you will never achieve a faithful or accurate result in your print.
Hey Randall... Thanks for sharing your views. I agree with you that the suitability of the results would depend on someone's work flow and final intentions. I cannot argue that of course the very best results of vision 3 can only be obtained by using the ECN2 chemistry design for it. However for the casual shooter for non professional work I think c41 remains a nice more accessible option for processing. Thanks for watching and it is nice to have you here, welcome to the family 😊
NOT A GOOD ADVICE. The ramjet from a vision film in a C41 lab can cause expansive damage. Add a disclaimer to the video
Hello there... Thanks for watching my video. I'm not suggesting on the video that people should develop their ECN2 film on a C41 minilab. I'm just merely comparing the results by using different methods.