วีดีโอ

beautiful! you use light meter?

1962 camera th-cam.com/video/uGR-49gho1U/w-d-xo.htmlsi=3ylCwEHiKz-5C8-K

I would also mention with regards to speed the flatbed scanner automates multiple negatives or transparencies. You set up multiples by highlighting each slide or negative you want scanned then press scan, then walk away for the next 30 minutes. I have scanned numerous slides this way on my Epson D750 and the Epson software does a decent job with negative conversions too.

Amazing results, magical!!!

that horrible old man in the hot sausage he is so mean but his hot dogs are good 🌭

As a curiosity, the Bellini C41 kit is interesting, because it is based on C41 RANP, the process most often used in minilabs. It has much shorter times for bleaching and fixing, and it uses a superflo type final wash instead of water. This enables using minilabs without a connection to running water.

Thanks for this video.

Keep going I like yours movies. Good job 👍

We have very similar setups for camera and scanning. The C-220 is a great camera. Nice video!

Enjoyed your video very much. Thank you for sharing your photos, I bordered between loving some and really liking others. That's a good thing, but they were all great. Thank you so, much. God Bless. Rogeer

Great video. I love Tri x. Still love diafine for a classic look. You’ve earned a new subscriber.

I photograph and scan as a hobbyist / enthusiast. Micro / Macro is part of my work. So a macro Bellows and copy down is always up. I’m simply dismounting a body to use somewhere else. It is faster, but is it better quality? Idk yet. Still comparing. But it looks nice. Nikon D850 w/ Nikkor 60/2.8D macro. The battery of a large cop stand conserve other uses throughout. As far as lights. The exact same copy stand lights that just stay there. Or any TTL flash

A couple of reasons I chose a Pentax DSLR are the convenience and cost savings of not having to always develop film, but moreso for the simple, inexpensive metal adapter that lets me use any of the billions of lenses designed for Pentax cameras all the way back through the M42 screw mount version on hoth my digital and my MX. I also prefer the older glass on my DSLR because they give my digital photos that soft film like quality that the human eye naturally sees.

I have 5x7" glass plates/slides. Which flatbed scanner would you recommend?

Ever since DSLR "scanning" became a thing, I've always thought it was the most rediculours and moronic nuance to happen to photography. Dedicated 35mm scanner (or a flat bed scanner which is a compromise IMO) is by far the more superior method of scanning at home. I could talk for hours about it. I might do a video myself haha.

¿Algún consejo para disparar el ECN2 en una point and shoot?

what kind of tank is that you’re using to develop?

What a nice video ❤ Out with wife : Sweet sharing together ❤ Great video ☺

Flatbed isn't one of the main methods. Those would be a dedicated film scanner like Plustek 8300 or Prime Film XA vs camera scanning. I've an Epson V550 (same as V600 - digital ICE) and flatbed scanner sucks for 35mm. It does ok for 120.

I also love developing film, I love it so much that I spent over a month producing a three part youtube short series showing my process. I just released the finale in my 3 part youtube short series on developing film at home. It was a lot of work, yet alot of fun to produce, hope you have as much fun watching as I did making it! Happy Snapping!

I just ordered a Pentax spotmatic for its lens, so after the inevitable arista test roll it’ll probably end up with a roll of phoenix

Thanks for this man. I've been looking for fomapan results since I mainly use kentmere 400 to push film.

Subbed! Reel dawgies dev at home! I just posted a teaser for the finale in my three part youtube shorts series on developing film at home. I don't think the shots I developed compare to the nice street scenes you got man. But another day another reel. Keep it up I look forward to catching you on my scroll. Oh and btw be careful with that squeegee. It can wreck a weak emulsion

Have you noticed any issues with the focus not being perfectly aligned when you have a lens set to infinity? I have tried two different lenses and two different bodies and been seeing that issue on both. Just curious if anyone else has and if it's going to be an issue?

I really appreciate you sharing this with us. The therapeutic power of photography, or any other hobby, to help us get through difficult times, emotional distress and heal ourselves is incredible. My story with street photography is pretty similar to yours. I immigrated from Colombia to Canada three years ago and, despite many migration perks, I’ve experienced some difficulties and faced hard feelings such as frustration and loneliness. That’s why I started pursuing an older photography passion I had during my university years: film photography. I found an old Olympus Trip 35 in a flea market a couple of years ago and started taking pictures now and then, going on photo walks, exploring the city and experimenting with different films and filters. Later, I added some new film cameras to my collection (looking for a Ricoh 500G is how I found you and this video), took more pictures around Canada and have been feeling better and better every day. Now, I’m learning how to develop at home and thinking how can I build a strong street film photography enthusiasts community in my city and, why not, the world.

One of my favourite analog cameras!

I quite liked the muted look. I think there is a role for this film ( pun unintended) in documentary photography.

Bizarre. In 1992 many of us were using Fujichrome Velvia, the most clear and punchy 35mm film just about ever. Nice video though - but I would use any colour film before that Colour 92. Is it meant to remind us of terrible processing at Snappy Snaps? Nice video though - thanks :)

That film seems unresponsive to colour.

Back to the gym! I'm actually not a fan of Color 92, mostly because the tones and temp are easy to achieve in post on any less expensive color stock. I really treat Lightroom the same as one would have used the darkroom in the past, making color adjustments, dodging and burning as desired, on all my film scans. I would say Color 92 might be useful for anyone who avoids or disapproves of the post process altogether.

This is very good, but ilfosol wouldn't be my developer of choice pafticularly with HP5 Plus. Try the HP5 plus @ iso 250 in stock solution of Perceptol. Beautiful tonality and almost as fine grained as an FP4 Plus.

Why not process with ECN-2 at home and avoid the lab fees?

Man TH-cam is strange. I still havent found a video that considers the most expensive aspect: time. The real question is: what is the fastest option that gives me the best quality with minimal effort? All the time you spend scanning is not spent doing something else. The cost of the gear is irrelevant if you have 60 years, or more, of negatives to scan.

Excellent video and the Delta 3200 shots are really cool

I'm very curious as to how the 400 ISO turned out, when you get the chance to publish that video!

LoL I am actually from Kathmandu. The place mentioned in the song.

Great to see you at the show. Lovely little summary of the photography show 😊

Genio!

I really liked your video and street photo and camera philosophy. I have a Rolleiflex too, such beautiful and capable cameras. Inspiring, thanks

For 35mm Ultramax and for 120 some Ektar 100

7:40 good photo

No

I think i remember a video a year or so ago where they had this camera in development at a pre production level.

Gay 👎

Wow I loved this video. My story as being a dad with a 25 year old daughter 🥰 Now I´m a Leica M6 man since 1996. Had the MX - it disappeared - just bought a MX for her birthday. This video contained exactly my feeling with my old trusty MX. Bumped through most of the world. Thanks so much ❤

One of the main advantages that smaller formats are supposed to have and NEED to have to keep up with competition, is super bright fast lenses, since they're cheaper and technically more possible to design for smaller formats. A large format lens at 5.6 is "Fast" for that, it's about as well as they can do affordably. Medium format, 2.8 is "Fast", 35mm, 1.4 is about the equivalent. half frame needs to have lenses around 1.1 to compete at a serious level (being able to use lower ISO to combat the grain, being able to get similar depth of field, etc), or at most like f/2 even if embracing many shortcomings. F/8 is bonkers. No excuse for an F/8 lens on a several hundred dollar half frame camera, that's SO cheap-ed out/ripoff.

Interesting video again. 👍 If I had extra money laying around maybe I might buy their Premium model. But as Pentax announced their upcoming half-frame compact I'm saving my pennies for that. I would suggest you to try higher ISO film with Alfie camera. Maybe even ISO 1600. Of course there will be lots of grain in pictures but then again you could use faster shutterspeeds. And it would give you some range to take pictures in indoors as well.

Snaps closer to the horizon line make stronger images.

I have some problems with TMJ, it has been chronic and has gotten in the way of enjoying life for me. Luckily I have an appliance from my dentist that helps and I'm in way less pain now. I've found photography allows me to concentrate less on how I'm feeling on the inside and focus more on the beauty you can find in the outside world. Thank you for sharing your story, it's encouraging to hear someone else coped with chronic pain with the help of photography 🙏

With all these cameras you can pre focus and open up the front of viewfinder and look through the back for correct orientation or even get a prism finder if that's what you want.